Share
Email This Page
add comment

Giant Plumes of Oil Found Under Gulf

Print
Sunday, 16 May 2010 09:19
Globs of brown oil are moving onshore in the Gulf, but vast amounts are also collecting beneath the water's surface, 05/15/10. (photo: Lee Celano/Reuters)

Globs of brown oil are moving onshore in the Gulf, but vast amounts are also collecting beneath the water's surface, 05/15/10. (photo: Lee Celano/Reuters)

 

 

cientists are finding enormous oil plumes in the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico, including one as large as 10 miles long, 3 miles wide and 300 feet thick in spots. The discovery is fresh evidence that the leak from the broken undersea well could be substantially worse than estimates that the government and BP have given.

"There's a shocking amount of oil in the deep water, relative to what you see in the surface water," said Samantha Joye, a researcher at the University of Georgia who is involved in one of the first scientific missions to gather details about what is happening in the gulf. "There's a tremendous amount of oil in multiple layers, three or four or five layers deep in the water column."

The plumes are depleting the oxygen dissolved in the gulf, worrying scientists, who fear that the oxygen level could eventually fall so low as to kill off much of the sea life near the plumes.

Dr. Joye said the oxygen had already dropped 30 percent near some of the plumes in the month that the broken oil well had been flowing. "If you keep those kinds of rates up, you could draw the oxygen down to very low levels that are dangerous to animals in a couple of months," she said Saturday. "That is alarming."

The plumes were discovered by scientists from several universities working aboard the research vessel Pelican, which sailed from Cocodrie, La., on May 3 and has gathered extensive samples and information about the disaster in the gulf.

Scientists studying video of the gushing oil well have tentatively calculated that it could be flowing at a rate of 25,000 to 80,000 barrels of oil a day. The latter figure would be 3.4 million gallons a day. But the government, working from satellite images of the ocean surface, has calculated a flow rate of only 5,000 barrels a day.

BP has resisted entreaties from scientists that they be allowed to use sophisticated instruments at the ocean floor that would give a far more accurate picture of how much oil is really gushing from the well.

"The answer is no to that," a BP spokesman, Tom Mueller, said on Saturday. "We're not going to take any extra efforts now to calculate flow there at this point. It's not relevant to the response effort, and it might even detract from the response effort."

The undersea plumes may go a long way toward explaining the discrepancy between the flow estimates, suggesting that much of the oil emerging from the well could be lingering far below the sea surface.

The scientists on the Pelican mission, which is backed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the federal agency that monitors the health of the oceans, are not certain why that would be. They say they suspect the heavy use of chemical dispersants, which BP has injected into the stream of oil emerging from the well, may have broken the oil up into droplets too small to rise rapidly.

BP said Saturday at a briefing in Robert, La., that it had resumed undersea application of dispersants, after winning Environmental Protection Agency approval the day before.

"It appears that the application of the subsea dispersant is actually working," Doug Suttles, BP's chief operating officer for exploration and production, said Saturday. "The oil in the immediate vicinity of the well and the ships and rigs working in the area is diminished from previous observations."

Many scientists had hoped the dispersants would cause oil droplets to spread so widely that they would be less of a problem in any one place. If it turns out that is not happening, the strategy could come under greater scrutiny. Dispersants have never been used in an oil leak of this size a mile under the ocean, and their effects at such depth are largely unknown.

Much about the situation below the water is unclear, and the scientists stressed that their results were preliminary. After the April 20 explosion of the Deepwater Horizon, they altered a previously scheduled research mission to focus on the effects of the leak.

Interviewed on Saturday by satellite phone, one researcher aboard the Pelican, Vernon Asper of the University of Southern Mississippi, said the shallowest oil plume the group had detected was at about 2,300 feet, while the deepest was near the seafloor at about 4,200 feet.

"We're trying to map them, but it's a tedious process," Dr. Asper said. "Right now it looks like the oil is moving southwest, not all that rapidly."

He said they had taken water samples from areas that oil had not yet reached, and would compare those with later samples to judge the impact on the chemistry and biology of the ocean.

While they have detected the plumes and their effects with several types of instruments, the researchers are still not sure about their density, nor do they have a very good fix on the dimensions.

Given their size, the plumes cannot possibly be made of pure oil, but more likely consist of fine droplets of oil suspended in a far greater quantity of water, Dr. Joye said. She added that in places, at least, the plumes might be the consistency of a thin salad dressing.

Dr. Joye is serving as a coordinator of the mission from her laboratory in Athens, Ga. Researchers from the University of Mississippi and the University of Southern Mississippi are aboard the boat taking samples and running instruments.

Dr. Joye said the findings about declining oxygen levels were especially worrisome, since oxygen is so slow to move from the surface of the ocean to the bottom. She suspects that oil-eating bacteria are consuming the oxygen at a feverish clip as they work to break down the plumes.

While the oxygen depletion so far is not enough to kill off sea life, the possibility looms that oxygen levels could fall so low as to create large dead zones, especially at the seafloor. "That's the big worry," said Ray Highsmith, head of the Mississippi center that sponsored the mission, known as the National Institute for Undersea Science and Technology.

The Pelican mission is due to end Sunday, but the scientists are seeking federal support to resume it soon.

"This is a new type of event, and it's critically important that we really understand it, because of the incredible number of oil platforms not only in the Gulf of Mexico but all over the world now," Dr. Highsmith said. "We need to know what these events are like, and what their outcomes can be, and what can be done to deal with the next one."

Shaila Dewan contributed reporting from Robert, La.

Open Article On Originating Site

 

Comments  

 
+24 # Guest 2010-05-16 12:41
It seems abundantly clear that BP should NOT be allowed to make decisions about which scientists from wherever can come near their damn disaster and do anything!!!!
Forget about giving them "control" over ANY decisions that affect OUR/THE WORLD'S oceans...period.
They have been exposed as downright CRIMINAL and their intentions aren't even close to honorable, they should be hauled into court and hammered and hammered and SHUT THE HELL UP.
Get their asses out of the way and get someone who knows anything down there in huge numbers.
And where are all the siphoning boats that could be sucking up this crap wherever they find it??????
Ferchrissakes, gawdalmighty.
 
 
+19 # cabotool 2010-05-16 12:51
I believe that we have no choice but to stop ALL new offshore drilling for oil and to take all possible steps to reduce our consumption of oil based products. To do otherwise is to be participating in the destruction of our planet!

I pray that all sensible and responsible person will do all that they individually can to follow up on this. Themselves and to spread the idea to their family and friends.
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-05-16 20:52
I have purchased vegetables to grow in a garden in my yard. I also combine errands to use less gas. And, I am buying locally as much as possible. I also drive a gas efficient compact car.
 
 
+7 # Guest 2010-05-16 14:13
Remember the Gulf!
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-05-16 14:48
When, oh when, are we going to move into the 21st century??? We have extraterrestria l friends out there who have the technologies that we do not have and who are wanting to share them with us, but will not impose themselves upon us as we continue to shoot them out of the skies! Hello, planet Earth! Our ET friends could have had that oil leak sealed the very first day....they have materials and abilities that we do not have! The also have energy technologies that ELIMINATE the need for oil and all other fossil fuels. Oh, now, could that be the problem.....the oil companies and the power companies certainly could not allow that, even as they are sucking our planet dry. Time, friends, for us to take back our power and heal our earth!
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-05-16 16:11
I agree that the work to control this oil spill should be taken from BP and given to NOAH. They in turn could decide who is best able to work this problem. Maybe it is BP, but probably not. Perhaps the problem is not taking the fix from the people who will be paying for it, and who can then say they won't pay for any damage occurring after NOAH takes over.
 
 
+13 # Guest 2010-05-16 16:26
We know that corporations are people. Our Constitution tells us so. (It's hard for ordinary citizens to locate the passages declaring this, but Roberts, Alito, Scalia, Thomas, and Kennedy have the special vision to see these passages.) Further, we know that crimes of great consequence have been committed. What is really extraordinary is that the criminals are controlling the crime scene--as this article lets us know; and they are attempting to control the sentencing--as we are told in other articles addressing their efforts to limit liability. It's as though a bank robber, caught red-handed after bribing a guard and then shooting all the customers within range, were to say: "O.k.; I'll accept two years in jail, but anything beyond that is just out of the question."
 
 
+7 # Guest 2010-05-16 16:46
The following article indicates that the federal Minerals Management Service was not completely honest about the inspection schedule for the rig that blew up. Reference the following link:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_gulf_oil_spill_inspections
 
 
+6 # Guest 2010-05-16 18:22
Write to the White House at whitehouse.gov
and tell him to put expert environmentalis ts in charge of the remediation efforts!!!!
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-05-16 21:35
The oil that is drilled off our coasts goes into the world oil market, and is not earmarked for the United States. It may be purchased by any country. We are told that 30% of our production comes from off our shores, but production needs to be distinguished from consumption. We don't produce anywhere near as much as we use, so the oil drilled off our shores is only a small fraction of our consumption. It's sad that the Bush administration cancelled research on diesel hybrids that had been started under Clinton. And it's sad that we are decades behind Europe in the development of high speed trains. We need to do everything possible to end our addiction to oil.
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-05-17 00:28
Here we have an unprecedented ecological disaster of far and away greater potential threat to the worlds ecosystem than we have ever faced in the history of mankind...and BP is rejecting entreaties from scientific experts to evaluate the amount of petroleum being leaked into the ocean because "Its not relevent to the response effort and it might even detract from the response effort."? Just who the hell are these clowns any way and why do they have any say in this matter at all?
I am reading now that oil is in deep ocean currents now heading for the Florida Keys and on up the east coast.

Look, the stakes are so grave that a multinational effort is probably going to be needed and any say so that BP has should be taken away. The federal government needs to seize the reins in this matter with due haste and quit engaging in tit for tat with the corporations involved. And we'd best get to nationalizing energy once and for all.
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-05-17 07:49
Still more revelations as revealed in the "60 Minutes" piece on the spill (Sunday, May 16) now indicate that there is at least one other off-shore rig much larger than the Gulf rig that is even more dangerous due to violations and neglect, and at risk of a similar disaster. BP and others need to held accountable for killing 11 employees, as well as poisoning the Gulf for who knows how long, and with still to be determined long term consequences for the fishing industry and tourism, much less the devastating impact on wild life and the environment.

BP, et al, will never agree to pay the entire cost, nor be able to afford it, despite its current $6 billion quarterly profits. The US Government should seize and nationalize BP's holdings, and those responsible- both corporate and government need to be held fully accountable in criminal court.
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-05-17 12:29
How you stop the leak, I don't know but how to clean up the current mess floating in the Gulf I do know. No one seems interested though to interact with the party who can destroy the oil slick wihout polluting the water and without polluting the air. His process is patented and he is ready, willing and able to deal with the problem. All anybody has to do is ask.
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-05-17 13:07
It is so obvious what we must do. We must immediately stop off shore drilling. We must put all of our efforts into alternative energy.

The other larger issue is corporate America, which has clearly become so powerful in both energy and finance, that the bests interests of the people cannot be served by them. They are all "too big to not fail"....

Break them all up...start over...
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.