Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Ralph Vartabedian reports: "Small amounts of radioactive isotopes from the crippled Japanese nuclear power plant are being blown toward North America high in the atmosphere over the Pacific Ocean and will reach California as soon as Friday, according to experts."

A Radnet monitor on the roof of the Bay Area Air Quality Management building in San Francisco, 03/17/11. (photo: AP)
A Radnet monitor on the roof of the Bay Area Air Quality Management building in San Francisco, 03/17/11. (photo: AP)



Radiation Will Reach California on Friday

By Ralph Vartabedian, Los Angeles Times

17 March 11

 

RSN Special Coverage: Disaster in Japan


ery low levels of radioactive isotopes from the damaged Japanese nuclear plant are expected to reach California as soon as Friday, but experts say the amount will be well within safe limits. A network of radiation monitors is keeping close watch.

Small amounts of radioactive isotopes from the crippled Japanese nuclear power plant are being blown toward North America high in the atmosphere over the Pacific Ocean and will reach California as soon as Friday, according to experts.

A network of sensors in the US and around the world is watching for the first signs of that fallout, though experts said they were confident that the amount of radiation would be well within safe limits.

Operated by the Environmental Protection Agency, the US network known as Radnet is a system of 100 radiation monitors that work 24 hours a day, spread across the country in places such as Anaheim, Bakersfield and Eureka. In addition, a network of 63 sensors is operated by the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization, an international agency allied with the United Nations.

Atmospheric experts said the material should begin showing up on the West Coast as early as Friday, though it could take up to an additional week for the 5,000-mile trip from Japan to Southern California. Although the organization has told its member countries that the first indication of radiation would hit on Friday, the plume from a North Korean nuclear test in 2006 took about two weeks to travel to North America, UN officials said.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which oversees the US nuclear industry, said Wednesday that it did not expect dangerous levels of radioactivity to hit the West Coast, Hawaii, Alaska or US territories in the Pacific. But whatever levels reach the US initially are likely to increase in subsequent days, because radioactive emissions from the damaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant have grown since the disaster began Friday. The NRC sharply raised its warning to American citizens in Japan, urging them to evacuate an area within 50 miles of the Fukushima complex. Japanese authorities have ordered an evacuation within about 12 miles of the plant.

The NRC released computerized projections showing that within half a mile of the plant, radiation levels were so high that one could receive a fatal dose, and that even 50 miles away one could receive more than 16 times the average annual dose all people are exposed to from natural sources.

Those numbers were sharply higher than ones the NRC released days earlier. But although the Fukushima reactors are leaking more radiation now, experts continued to say that the particles would wash out of the atmosphere before they could reach the US.

So far, Tokyo Electric Power Co., which operates the Fukushima facility, and the Japanese government have not released any measurements or estimates of the total amount of radioactivity released by the accident. These numbers would be crucial to better project whether the material could affect other Asian nations, the Pacific islands or even the US.

Edwin Lyman, a specialist at the nuclear watchdog group Union of Concerned Scientists, said that although it was true that the more radioactivity released in Japan the more could migrate away from the region, he did not think the US was at serious risk.

"We can never say never," Lyman said. "My judgment is that there will probably be measurable radiation, but except for a few hot spots it is not something we should really worry about."

Lyman said that the NRC's warning Wednesday to Americans in Japan to evacuate 50 miles from the Fukushima reactors was a long-overdue admission that the agency's prior warnings of a 10-mile exclusion zone from US reactors during an emergency was inadequate.

Key federal officials involved in the Radnet monitoring program have so far not disclosed their predictions for US radioactive exposure. The projections are being developed by the National Atmospheric Release Advisory Center operated at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Northern California. The center, part of the Energy Department, uses sophisticated models on supercomputers to project the movement of radioactive particles and other toxic substances through the atmosphere.

However, a computer model of atmospheric movements developed by the Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy shows that the Fukushima plumes could travel across the Pacific, though the levels of radioactivity that could reach the West Coast of the US remain unclear.

It appears that all of the models, however, are not based on measurements of radioactivity at the source and a projection of actual radioactive fallout in the US, but rather project a relative scale of radioactivity. Since Japanese authorities have said little about the amount of the releases at Fukushima, nobody can say how much radioactivity will hit California.

The models show that even with prevailing easterly winds, the plumes whip back and forth over a wide area of Japan's east coast, Russia's Kamchatka peninsula and Alaska's Aleutian Islands. It is unknown whether nuclear fallout is hitting the vast wilderness of northeastern Asia.

Of particular concern, however, is radiation emanating from Fukushima's No. 3 reactor. That reactor uses plutonium fuel, which poses a special health risk even in small quantities if the fallout were to reach US shores.

A leading radiological health expert at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Wednesday that the CDC was still confident that there would be no serious health consequences here. But CDC officials are watching the situation carefully.

"We have a saying: 'Modeling is OK, but measurement is everything,'" he said.

The Environmental Protection Agency said that it was watching the situation closely, but that its Radnet system had not yet detected radioactivity. It has added seven additional portable radiation monitors: two in Guam, three in Alaska and two in Hawaii.

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+26 # Gayle Ruedi 2011-03-17 09:53
I'm surprised the Republicans haven't totally de-funded the EPA by now. Then we wouldn't have to be concerned about radiation--at least not until people started getting sick.
 
 
+5 # billy bob 2011-03-17 16:56
Who told you they aren't trying?
 
 
+57 # portiz 2011-03-17 09:54
Nuclear energy is NOT cheap - this disater proves that.

Petro energy is NOT cheap - two dumb wars costing thousands of lives and $1.5T proves that.

Build an infrastructure of wind turbines, solar collectors, tidal and wave energy - common sense proves that.
 
 
+11 # keep it simple 2011-03-17 10:25
My concern on the radiation coming to west coast of America or anywhere is what type and how long of exposure.

Could Plutonium be falling as soon as Friday the 18th? How long to hide inside, a day, week, month, year? We need more honest information from reputable sources.
 
 
+8 # Olde Edo 2011-03-17 12:45
Hello, "keep it simple".
I'm living in Tokyo, and fluent in Japanese. I found a Google Map annotated with locations of radiation monitors at varying distances from Fukushima (some privately owned, some govt).
link=
Radiation levels have gone down.
Also, one site in Tokyo monitors 2 isotopes each of iodine and cesium (sadly, no other elements are monitored), and the most recent data I have seen is cesium is negligible and iodine is measurable but quite low.
link=, refer to the dated PDF files.
Fallout containing plutonium is unlikely, but other decay
products are being released.
No idea how this will turn out, but water cannons were used to spray the overheated spent fuel pool last night and more will be sprayed this morning, so we hope the cooling and containing effect of the water will allow workers to make electrical and other repairs to contain the situation.

Tokyo Electric Power Co. is a bunch of chickens with their heads cut off. They should send the executives & their politician cronies into the damned reactors to clean them up.

Best wishes for all.
 
 
+2 # billy bob 2011-03-17 20:17
I just read that they've given up and it's only a matter of time now.
 
 
-18 # I. B. Marshall 2011-03-17 10:33
It sounds as if California will certainly be wiped out in the next couple of weeks. Now where will I get my Strawberrys. And I will be a goner for sure..... No more wine... Dam. I guess we must all move to Neveda or Arizona.
TED
 
 
+5 # aikidokurt 2011-03-17 16:28
Quoting
It sounds as if California will certainly be wiped out in the next couple of weeks. Now where will I get my Strawberrys. And I will be a goner for sure..... No more wine... Dam. I guess we must all move to Neveda or Arizona.
TED
hang in there, I.B.; your time is going to come
"stupid is as stupid does..." forrest gump
 
 
+17 # Morris Townson 2011-03-17 10:41
Do not rely on your government to tell you the truth about what's happening. Governments are in the business of "preventing panic" by withholding information you need to know.
 
 
+3 # bluescat48 2011-03-17 10:46
The radiation, when it gets here, would be measured in millcentigrays/hour (millirads/hour for those as old or older than me). Minuscule levels.
 
 
+3 # Jadhu 2011-03-17 13:43
Katrina, BP, Haiti, Tsunamis, and Earthquakes... Is the Earth trying to send us a message? God knows we have sent the Earth enough messages of hate and disregard. Christians call it "end of days," but don't believe in Global Warming. All religions acknowledge a day of reckoning. Could it be time to heed Rachel Carson's SILENT SPRING?
 
 
+11 # billy bob 2011-03-17 17:23
The Earth isn't sending us a message. It's just doing what it does - being the Earth.

The problem is that we can only go so far living on the Earth while acting as though we have a backup planet in case we make the Earth uninhabitable for ourselves. We are only hurting ourselves. Maybe the executives of big oil and big "nucular" will be raptured before the rest of us face the tribulations they're trying to cause.
 
 
+9 # oakes721 2011-03-17 13:46
The nuclear industry's early promise of, "Too cheap to meter" must have meant they were too cheap to meter radiation levels. Saying it will dissipate into the atmosphere ignores the fact that this thin layer of livable environment is the only atmosphere we've got to be concerned about. These things don't just disappear. Our background radiation level has been increasing every year due to the constant releases and foreseeable accidents of an irresponsibly deadly industry.
 
 
0 # billy bob 2011-03-17 16:57
42,000 years...
 
 
+7 # billy bob 2011-03-17 17:19
24,000 years half-life for Plutonium-239. In 24,000 years it will NOT be stable enough to safely enter the surrounding environment. It will have, afterall, only reached its HALF-LIFE.

Estimates I've read are that it would take c. 42,000 years for all leftover waste from most nuclear plants to become safe enough to re-enter the environment.

I can EASILY find the source for the 24,000 year half-life. The other source I've read isn't as easy to find. Do any repugs want to quibble?

I'm tired of the argument that "we can't just over-react and go 'anti-nuclear' now. Afterall, these reactors are 40 years old..."

REALLY? So how many buildings are there in existence that are several times as old as the pyramids? How many of those are what you'd call "stable" structures? Are we living in an era well known for making things to "last"? I'm sure it won't be a problem. Afterall, YOUR children will escape to the planet ZOLTAR, right?

Another great argument goes something like this: "Well, it's either that or coal..."

Also known as a FALSE DILEMMA.

A more complete response could be paraphrased: "well, it's either that, or something stable, safe, cheeper than fossil fuels, reliable and clean, but unfortunately, politically incorrect and more difficult to profit from due to its inherent cheapness to produce."
 
 
+2 # GTrout 2011-03-17 23:57
But, Billy Bob, every good Republican can tell you the earth is only 6,000 years old; your half-life warning will not be taken seriously. I mean, really - 42,000 years...that's just silly, 7 times the whole age of the world! ;-)
 
 
0 # billy bob 2011-03-19 13:13
Awesome reply. You certainly got me on the facts there.
 
 
+3 # Ca Dream 2011-03-17 17:21
Those of you that are complacent, thank you for the downplay; since I own my own Scintillator I'll be looking at my own numbers.

As I remember from the 50's, its best not to go out if it rains, until it has rained at least an hour.
 
 
+3 # KittatinyHawk 2011-03-17 19:11
You are all discussing air contamination. Does anyone remember News stating that a crack in base of plants. Means any Radiation that gets into ground will have effects on land and water. 'Core on the Floor"

old spent fuel rods are kept on site So this will affect us one way or another.
Why didn't all these geniuses on Nuke Power go there day one? Why were those really good suits waited until today St Patrick's Day to be sent to those Workers?
EPA re regulations is on a bill attachment Right now along with Wolf deactivate from endangered species in front of Congress right now. The GOP are using Strikes, This Disaster to pass NPR voting and more while you are all asleep at the wheel OBama better be Vetoing instead he is looking to allow the Grand Canton up for bids. Alaska is siding with Big Oil to open Refuge, I think they better think about Alaska having anything to offer anyone if a meltdown happens.

No one will tell the truth, but the Fish and Birds will. I get alerts daily, we have to hope they do not lie. Where is Cousteau when you need him? But do not know how long it will take. Just say prayers for those workers.
 
 
0 # outreach 2011-03-18 06:09
Now we are having trouble with our Crystal River nuke plant in Florida. They tell us not to worry, it's just a crack in the cement...
 
 
+1 # granny 2011-03-18 07:08
Is nuclear energy another of the Koch Heads' investments?
 
 
0 # billy bob 2011-03-19 13:17
I'm sure it isn't. If it were, the nuclear waste would be released INTENTIONALLY, and a form of radiation would have been created that specifically targets poor people, women, children, and union members.
 
 
0 # billy bob 2011-03-19 13:12
Don't worry. You can still eat your fish, so long as it doesn't come from the Atlantic Ocean, the Great Lakes, most of our rivers, fish farms, and now, the Pacific Ocean.

Enjoy your fish!!!
 
 
0 # kprugman 2011-03-20 00:21
Street price in San Diego for a bottle of potassium Iodide (KI) on Friday was $400. The panic that created the shortage and those who profited from it, should be a lesson for all of us.

The Egyptian self-proclaimed 'nobles' did precisely the same thing when they artificially created shortages of necessities, like sugar and flour. Its no wonder their own people turned against them - if we faced starvation, we would too!

And if our government doesn't start providing workable solutions, what will happen to us? Apologies and self-pity cost our politicians nothing while their arrogance and extreme bias toward the free-market are as destructive as any tsunami. Tsunamis are apparently more common than honest politicians.
 
 
0 # Bob C 2011-03-20 04:34
Improved containment structures have been cited as a reason for trust in the safety of nuclear power plants. However, evidence and research have shown that isotope molecules released from within the cores degrade structural materials, making steel and concrete more brittle over time.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.