Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "It is now virtually certain a child born in 1979 will not reach 50 years of age before the Arctic is ice-free in the summer. That is a rapid change on a planetary scale, with far-reaching consequences that scientists are just beginning to understand."

This data visualization from the Aqua satellite show the maximum sea ice extent for 2008-09. (photo: NASA Goddard's Scientific Visualization Studio)
This data visualization from the Aqua satellite show the maximum sea ice extent for 2008-09. (photo: NASA Goddard's Scientific Visualization Studio)




Record Arctic Ice Melt Threatens Global Security

By Stephen Leahy, Inter Press Service

15 September 11

 

ll the analysis and commentary about safety and security on the tenth anniversary of 9/11 ignored by far the biggest ongoing threat to global security: climate change.

Just days before Sunday's commemoration of the attacks, German scientists pointed to yet another smoking gun of climate change: the Arctic sea ice reached a new historic minimum ice extent.

The rapidity with which the planet is losing its northern ice cap continues to astonish experts. The defrosting northern pole is one of the prime drivers of Earth's climate system and is changing global weather patterns in unpredictable ways.

The Arctic ice melt is also accelerating the rate of climate change beyond what humanity is doing with every barrel of oil, tonne of coal or cubic meter of gas burned.

On Sept. 8, researchers at the University of Bremen in Germany reported that the Arctic ice melt bettered the previous minimum of 2007. Other research centers using different satellite and analysis tools say the extraordinary decline of ice in 2007 has not yet been exceeded this year and 2011 remains a close second.

"We think it will end up a little bit short of the record - not that it really matters," said Mark Serreze, director of the National Snow and Ice Data Center in the US city of Boulder, Colorado.

"What is extraordinary this year is that there was no weird weather pattern that created the perfect conditions for the record melt in 2007," Serreze told IPS.

This year, the summer weather was normal and yet it the ice vanished in similar amounts to 2007.

"That tells us the sea ice is too thin now to hold up under normal weather conditions," he said.

Both the Northwest Passage and the Northern Sea Route across the Arctic are wide open again, as has happened almost every year since 2007. An oil tanker recently crossed the Arctic Ocean in the record time of eight days traveling from Houston, Texas to Map Ta Phut, Thailand.

This summer's ice loss is double the summer ice melt of 30 to 40 years ago. A child born at the advent of the satellite era, when humanity had its first complete look at the frozen vastness, would be 32 years old today. Now they would see that more than three million square kilometers of ice - about the size of India - has vanished this summer compared to the summer they were born.

It is now virtually certain a child born in 1979 will not reach 50 years of age before the Arctic is ice-free in the summer. That is a rapid change on a planetary scale, with far-reaching consequences that scientists are just beginning to understand.

One consequence is the acceleration of global warming as the Arctic flips from all white to dark blue, with the ocean absorbing tremendous amounts of heat from the 24-hour summer sun. That shift in albedo - from white to dark - is expected to add an additional amount of heat energy of about 0.3 watts per square meter over the entire land and water surface of the planet, calculates Stephen Hudson of the Norwegian Polar Institute.

Hudson based his calculation on the Arctic having no ice for one month and decreased ice at all other times of the year.

That's enough additional energy to power an LED night light for each square meter of the 510 million square meters that comprise the Earth's surface. That will raise global temperatures about 0.25 C, John Abraham of the University of St. Thomas in Minnesota told IPS.

Of course, most of that tremendous amount of heat will reside first in the Arctic, where temperatures are already an average of three to five degrees C higher than 30 to 40 years ago. This winter parts of the Arctic were 21 C above normal for a month.

All that additional heat threatens to light the fuse of the world's biggest "carbon bomb", the vast permafrost region spanning 13 million square kilometers across Alaska, Canada, Siberia and parts of northern Europe.

Permafrost contains at least twice as much carbon as is currently present in the atmosphere. Even if a small percentage of this is released, catastrophic climate change is likely, experts believe. Permafrost has been slowly thawing for the last two decades and the rate of thaw is accelerating with rising temperatures, world expert on permafrost Vladimir Romanovsky of the University of Alaska in Fairbanks told IPS previously.

This will have profound impacts on human populations around the globe. According to figures from the Global Governance Project, by the year 2050, the world will have 200 million climate-displaced refugees on its hands, the majority of them from low-lying coastal areas, as a result of rising water levels.

While this climate change calamity gains momentum, the US and most of the industrialized world have been distracted by the relatively trivial threat of terrorism and have spent trillions of dollars on defense and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The US could generate 100 percent of its electricity from wind, solar, tidal and geothermal for much less than it has spent on defense and wars in the last decade, said Richard Heinberg, energy expert and senior fellow at the California-based Post Carbon Institute.

However, the US economy is in such poor shape, Heinberg, author of the new book "The End of Growth", told IPS, that the country is no longer financially capable of doing this. Nor can it afford to continue to burn fossil fuels.

"We're going to be forced to use a lot less energy sooner or later," he said.

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+53 # Jeff C 2011-09-15 16:55
Given the obvious role that deficit spending associated with the American WWII effort played in terms of ending The Great Depression, I’m beginning to think that - sadly - the United States is missing an incredible opportunity here. We certainly have the moral equivalent the Allied WWII effort in the global climate crisis. And that could well be an understatement, because global warming threatens the very ecosystem on which our species depends for life. I’d love to have someone try and explain to me why that’s not an imperative for action. So why haven’t our fearless leaders in Washington proposed a genuinely bold jobs plan for American workers focused on the development of non fossil fuel - base energy alternatives as well as development and construction of the associated infrastructure? It seems that there could be enormous collateral benefit in terms of jobs creation, technological advancement as well as elimination of dependence on foreign oil and peak oil concerns. Imagine what kind of future we could build. And imagine how a leader like FDR might have responded to these challenges…and these opportunities.
 
 
+38 # Barkingcarpet 2011-09-15 20:31
Ye Ha! Lets go for a drive and go shopping! Or, maybe, perhaps, we would all be better off to sacrifice a bit, and possible have a future for our children, or any other life?

We have a choice here folks. Selfish, and self serving into oblivion, or, start to behave as if life, nature, and being long term steward matter more than cheap junk, and $ profits which are based mostly on exploitation.

Whats say lets choose community, creativity, education, sharing, and taking care of this lil ol planet,and each other, eh?

Boot the bozos and war profiteers at the top.
 
 
+33 # DPM 2011-09-15 20:54
Just goes to show that the climate change deniers and their political hacks could care less for even their own children and grandchildren, let alone everyone else.
USA! SHORT TERM PROFITS! USA! SHORT TERM PROFITS!
 
 
+21 # giraffe 2011-09-15 22:02
Today Boner said he'd pass part of the Jobs act if we can have more "drill baby drill" --- I think the GOP/TP want us to go down! Monetarily, invironmentally , wars -- and in every which way.

Vote 2012 - for Obama and Dems -- no matter what. Even if the Dem is not totally clean -- we KNOW the GOP/TP will take us staight to hell.
 
 
+5 # Anarchist 23 2011-09-16 19:51
New Motto for the Tea Party :"The Greatest Evil For The Greatest Number"!
 
 
-26 # MidwestTom 2011-09-16 04:01
Just two months ago I read that the oceans had dropped approximately 1/4 inch. Where did the water from the melting ice go?
 
 
+20 # jon 2011-09-16 06:07
That's interesting, because a month ago I read that the US Navy had marked a new high water level at a couple of bases.

And, it is clear the ice is melting - just ask the drowned polar bears - therefore it defies logic to imagine that the water level is dropping.

You were probably reading a Rupert Murdoch owned rag.
 
 
+4 # RLF 2011-09-16 06:34
Into the sky...notice the record rainfalls and flooding around the country?
 
 
+3 # ABen 2011-09-16 08:33
I am relieved to see that you read??? Now you should work on what you read.
 
 
+5 # PGreen 2011-09-16 10:20
According to Carmen Boening, climate scientist quoted in the Washington Post, "the continents got an extra dose of rain, so much so that global sea levels actually fell..." The article goes on to say that "this water will eventually return to the ocean." Man caused "global warming" produces climate instability. This will mean more and less rain-- higher and lower temperatures-- at different intervals.
 
 
+4 # Anarchist 23 2011-09-16 19:50
Hi Tom-it's a very curious phenomena and I know that puzzled me as well but apparently, the melting ice won't raise sea levels-just as the melting ice does not raise the level in your glass-or so they tell me. However, with the white polar ice cap changing into a blue polar sea, the earth will absorb more heat rather than reflect it back into space, and melting glaciers sliding off Greenland into the sea and Antarctica will raise levels-and then there will be the torrential rain falls, flooding and probably drought. And them maybe an ice age. It's called global warming but the effects will vary. One thing I think we will definitely agree on-we won't like them!
 
 
0 # JohnMayer 2011-11-17 00:44
Ice already floating upon the ocean surface won’t raise sea levels when it melts as a direct result of the ice becoming water. It WILL raise ocean levels significantly by lowering the albedo and absorbing more solar energy, a process that will cause the seas to expand (warm water has greater volume than cold water, which is why a gallon of cold water weighs more than a gallon of warm water). Additionally, cubic miles of ice that are not floating, that are sitting upon Greenland or on solid land in the antarctic, WILL raise ocean levels directly when they melt or slide into the seas. Of course, warming and evaporating seas will put more moisture into the air, and clouds INCREASE albedo, but not enough, I fear to counter the negative impacts.
 
 
0 # JohnMayer 2011-11-17 00:30
Quoting
Just two months ago I read that the oceans had dropped approximately 1/4 inch. Where did the water from the melting ice go?

Was the article just too long to finish? It went inland. http://www.pressherald.com/news/nationworld/two-weather-cycles-drop-ocean-levels-a-quarter-inch_2011-08-26.html Also be aware when next you search for information to validate your erroneous beliefs, that there ARE temporary regional differences in ocean levels that might also cause you confusion. http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/07/regional-sea-rise/
 
 
+12 # ABen 2011-09-16 07:51
I am the Great and powerful FFFM (fossil fueled free market). Global warming is nothing more than a Liberal hoax designed to undercut the divine will of Market Forces. Put your faith and trust in Me and go shopping in your gas-guzzling SUV. (pay no attention to that man behind the curtain)
 
 
+5 # johnjb32 2011-09-16 10:08
The amount of methane hydrates about to be released from the melting of Tundra is very well described here as a carbon bomb. And yes, even in spite of all the horrific news we're seeing, climate change is what we all must see, acknowledge and prepare for as much as anything else. -- Michael C. Ruppert

http://goo.gl/jsFie
 
 
+1 # aitengri 2011-09-16 13:46
The first step is going to have to be a radical political tsunami, in which an almost instantaneous economic revolution preempts all investment decisions, capital funds are frozen, and the money flow is directed into two streams: STREAM #1 Cash for necessities, and the prioritization of necessity based production and distribution - and STREAM #2 enormous crash programs for the practically instantaneous installation of non-carbon energy systems, and population re-settlement programs, with attendant agricultural expansion, dike construction, etc. etc. Step two will be the legal and extra-legal uses of security to enforce disinvestment and wealth confiscation, while attempting to safeguard basic human rights by separating so-called "economic" rights from personal liberty - all the legal talent we possess will have to be marhalled into an intellectual endeavor to structure, even after the pragmatic events have unfolded, the general rationale of the programs. The overarching theme will be the those of "emergency" and "survival" for humanity.
 
 
+4 # Anarchist 23 2011-09-16 19:44
On Aug 2 1987 there was an article in my local newspaper that 600 scientists issued a report saying that if we don't lower pollution levels in 29 years the planet will be past saving and humankind will have 30 years at outside. I wrote that note down in my journal and just found it last night. Of course nobody listened! Give up on illusions and prepare to live and probably travel light; the Disney-fyed world they sold you is about to fall flat!
 
 
+1 # readerz 2011-09-16 20:54
Study of world geology is fairly new in world history, and remember those old "Mercator Projection" maps that cut off Antarctica? Look at the usgs dot gov maps of world earthquakes: there seem to be strings of little ones that coincide with the freezes. Ice that stays ice is fairly safe; ice that melts in summer then freezes every fall then melt every spring could shift tectonic plates.
 
 
0 # jadaharie 2011-09-18 18:25
The LIFE project at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, had a successful fusion experiment - for a billionth of a second. They expect to move form there to building a demo power plant by 2020, and rollout globally in 2030 . An observer there said "its like watching the Wright brothers first flight.!"
This is a non polluting endless energy source which is getting some funding - no doubt more would accelerate it - you can check it out at lasers.llnl.gov.
"(PhysOrg.com) -- Researchers at the U.S. National Ignition Facility (NIF) report that they are growing ever closer to reaching the ignition point with their laser generated nuclear fusion project. The facility, part of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has been doing research to find out if very high powered lasers could be used to create nuclear fusion that could then be used to drive steam turbines to make electricity. In related news, officials for UK companies AWE and the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory have announced that they are joining forces with the research team working on the NIF project, adding years of expertise in both nuclear fusion and laser technology."
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.