Dickinson writes: "Back when he was running for president in 2008, Barack Obama insisted that medical marijuana was an issue best left to state and local governments. But over the past year, the Obama administration has quietly unleashed a multiagency crackdown on medical cannabis that goes far beyond anything undertaken by George W. Bush."
I'm not going to be using Justice Department resources to try to circumvent state laws on this issue,' vowed presidential candidate Obama in 2008. (photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Obama's War on Pot
18 February 12
In a shocking about-face, the administration has launched a government-wide crackdown on medical marijuana.
ack when he was running for president in 2008, Barack Obama insisted that medical marijuana was an issue best left to state and local governments. "I'm not going to be using Justice Department resources to try to circumvent state laws on this issue," he vowed, promising an end to the Bush administration's high-profile raids on providers of medical pot, which is legal in 16 states and the District of Columbia.
But over the past year, the Obama administration has quietly unleashed a multiagency crackdown on medical cannabis that goes far beyond anything undertaken by George W. Bush. The feds are busting growers who operate in full compliance with state laws, vowing to seize the property of anyone who dares to even rent to legal pot dispensaries, and threatening to imprison state employees responsible for regulating medical marijuana. With more than 100 raids on pot dispensaries during his first three years, Obama is now on pace to exceed Bush's record for medical-marijuana busts. "There's no question that Obama's the worst president on medical marijuana," says Rob Kampia, executive director of the Marijuana Policy Project. "He's gone from first to worst."
The federal crackdown imperils the medical care of the estimated 730,000 patients nationwide - many of them seriously ill or dying - who rely on state-sanctioned marijuana recommended by their doctors. In addition, drug experts warn, the White House's war on law-abiding providers of medical marijuana will only drum up business for real criminals. "The administration is going after legal dispensaries and state and local authorities in ways that are going to push this stuff back underground again," says Ethan Nadelmann, director of the Drug Policy Alliance. Gov. Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island, a former Republican senator who has urged the DEA to legalize medical marijuana, pulls no punches in describing the state of affairs produced by Obama's efforts to circumvent state law: "Utter chaos."
In its first two years, the Obama administration took a refreshingly sane approach to medical marijuana. Shortly after Obama took office, a senior drug-enforcement official pledged to Rolling Stone that the question of whether marijuana is medicine would now be determined by science, "not ideology." In March 2009, Attorney General Eric Holder emphasized that the Justice Department would only target medical-marijuana providers "who violate both federal and state law." The next morning, a headline in The New York Times read OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO STOP RAIDS ON MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSERS. While all forms of marijuana would remain strictly illegal under federal law - the DEA ranks cannabis as a Schedule I drug, on par with heroin - the feds would respect state protections for providers of medical pot. Framing the Obama administration's new approach, drug czar Gil Kerlikowske famously declared, "We're not at war with people in this country."
That original hands-off policy was codified in a Justice Department memo written in October 2009 by Deputy Attorney General David Ogden. The so-called "Ogden memo" advised federal law-enforcement officials that the "rational use of its limited investigative and prosecutorial resources" meant that medical-marijuana patients and their "caregivers" who operate in "clear and unambiguous compliance with existing state law" could be left alone.
At the same time, Ogden was concerned that the feds not "be made a fool of" by illegal drug traffickers. In that vein, his memo advised U.S. attorneys to focus on going after pot dispensaries that posed as medicinal but were actively engaged in criminal acts, such as selling to minors, possession of illegal firearms or money-laundering. The idea, as Holder put it, was to raid only those hardcore traffickers who "use medical-marijuana laws as a shield."
The Ogden memo sent a clear message to the states: The feds will only intervene if you allow pot dispensaries to operate as a front for criminal activity. States from New Mexico to Maine moved quickly to license and regulate dispensaries through their state health departments - giving medical marijuana unprecedented legitimacy. In California, which had allowed "caregivers" to operate dispensaries, medical pot blossomed into a $1.3 billion enterprise - shielded from federal blowback by the Ogden memo.
The administration's recognition of medical cannabis reached its high-water mark in July 2010, when the Department of Veterans Affairs validated it as a legitimate course of treatment for soldiers returning from the front lines. But it didn't take long for the fragile federal detente to begin to collapse. The reversal began at the Drug Enforcement Agency with Michele Leonhart, a holdover from the Bush administration who was renominated by Obama to head the DEA. An anti-medical-marijuana hard-liner, Leonhart had been rebuked in 2008 by House Judiciary chairman John Conyers for targeting dispensaries with tactics "typically reserved for the worst drug traffickers and kingpins." Her views on the larger drug war are so perverse, in fact, that last year she cited the slaughter of nearly 1,000 Mexican children by the drug cartels as a counterintuitive "sign of success in the fight against drugs."
In January 2011, weeks after Leonhart was confirmed, her agency updated a paper called "The DEA Position on Marijuana." With subject headings like THE FALLACY OF MARIJUANA FOR MEDICINAL USE and SMOKED MARIJUANA IS NOT MEDICINE, the paper simply regurgitated the Bush administration's ideological stance, in an attempt to walk back the Ogden memo. Sounding like Glenn Beck, the DEA even blamed "George Soros" and "a few billionaires, not broad grassroots support" for sustaining the medical-marijuana movement - even though polls show that 70 percent of Americans approve of medical pot.
Almost immediately, federal prosecutors went on the attack. Their first target: the city of Oakland, where local officials had moved to raise millions in taxes by licensing high-tech indoor facilities for growing medical marijuana. A month after the DEA issued its hard-line position, U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag warned the city that the feds were weighing "criminal prosecution" against the proposed pot operations. Abandoning the Ogden memo's protections for state-sanctioned "caregivers," Haag effectively re-declared war on medical pot. "We will enforce the Controlled Substances Act vigorously against individuals and organizations that participate in unlawful manufacturing and distribution activity involving marijuana," she wrote, "even if such activities are permitted under state law." Haag's warning shot had the desired effect: Oakland quickly scuttled its plans, even though the taxes provided by the indoor grows could have single-handedly wiped out the city's $31 million deficit.
Two months later, federal prosecutors in Washington state went even further, threatening state employees responsible for implementing new regulations for pot dispensaries. U.S. attorneys sent a letter to Gov. Christine Gregoire, warning that state employees "would not be immune from liability under the Controlled Substances Act." Shocked by the threat - "It subjected Washington state employees to felony criminal prosecution!" - Gregoire vetoed the new rules. A similar federal threat in Rhode Island forced Chafee to follow suit, putting an indefinite hold on the planned opening of three state-licensed "compassion centers" to distribute marijuana to seriously ill patients.
In isolation, such moves might be seen as the work of overzealous U.S. attorneys, who operate with considerable autonomy. But last June, the Justice Department effectively declared that it was returning to the Bush administration's hard-line stance on medical marijuana. James Cole, who had replaced Ogden as deputy attorney general, wrote a memo revoking his predecessor's deference to states on the definition of "caregiver." The term, Cole insisted, applied only to "individuals providing care to individuals with cancer or other serious illnesses, not commercial operations cultivating, selling or distributing marijuana." Pot dispensaries, in short, were once again prime federal targets, even if they were following state law to the letter. "The Cole memo basically adopted the Bush policy," says Kampia, "which was only that the Justice Department will not go after individual patients."
In reality, however, the Obama administration has also put patients in the cross hairs. Last September, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms moved to deprive Americans who use medical marijuana of their gun rights. In an open letter to gun sellers, the ATF warned that it is unlawful to sell "any firearm or ammunition" to "any person who uses or is addicted to marijuana, regardless of whether his or her state has passed legislation authorizing marijuana use for me dicinal purposes." If your doctor advises you to use medicinal pot, in other words, you can no longer legally own a gun. Hunting advocates were outraged. Sen. Jon Tester, a Democrat from Montana, wrote a furious letter calling on the Justice Department to reassess its "chilling" policy, declaring it "unacceptable that law-abiding citizens would be stripped of their Second Amendment rights."
Since the federal crackdown began last year, the DEA has raided dozens of medical-cannabis dispensaries from Michigan to Montana. Haag, the U.S. attorney for Northern California, claims the federal action is necessary because the state's legalized pot dispensaries have been "hijacked by profiteers" who are nothing more than criminals.
It's true that California has no shortage of illegal pot dealers. Nonmedical marijuana is the state's largest cash crop, raking in an estimated $14 billion a year. And demand is growing, in part because former governor Arnold Schwarzenegger thwarted a ballot measure aimed at full legalization in 2010 by removing criminal penalties for possession of up to an ounce of pot. But instead of focusing limited federal resources on off-the-grid growers in places like Humboldt County, who are often armed and violent, Haag targeted Matthew Cohen, a medical-marijuana farmer in Mendocino who was growing 99 plants under the direct supervision of the county sheriff. As part of a pioneering collaboration with local law enforcement, Cohen marked each of his plants with county-supplied tags, had his secured facility inspected and distributed the marijuana he grew directly to patients in his nonprofit collective.
Cohen appeared to be precisely the kind of caregiver that the Ogden memo advised should be given safe harbor for operating in "clear and unambiguous compliance with existing state law." But last October, DEA agents stormed Cohen's farm in the middle of the night and cut down his crop. Sheriff Tom Allman, who learned of the raid on his turf only an hour before it was executed, was outraged. "Matt Cohen was not in violation of any state or local ordinances when federal agents arrived at his location," Allman says. In January, Haag took the fight to the next level, threatening county officials like Allman with federal sanctions. Three weeks later, county supervisors voted to abandon the program to license and monitor Mendocino's legal growers. "This is a huge step backward," says Allman.
Haag's treatment of urban dispensaries has been equally ham-handed. She recently shuttered one of the oldest dispensaries in the state, a nonprofit that serves a high percentage of female patients in Marin County, which has the nation's highest rate of breast cancer. She has threatened to seize the properties that landlords rent to legal pot dispensaries. And in San Francisco, she targeted Divinity Tree, a cooperative run by a quadriplegic who himself relies on prescribed cannabis for relief from near-constant muscle spasms. At a time of high unemployment and huge budget deficits, the move killed more than a dozen jobs and deprived the state of $180,000 in annual tax revenue. In San Diego alone, the feds have shut down nearly two-thirds of the county's dispensaries. Statewide, the United Food and Commercial Workers Union estimates, the federal crackdown has destroyed some 2,500 jobs in California. It also sent street prices soaring by at least 20 percent, putting more money in the hands of actual criminals.
In addition, the federal war on medical marijuana has locked pot dispensaries out of the banking system - especially in Colorado, home to the nation's second-largest market for medicinal cannabis. Top banks - including Chase, Wells Fargo and Bank of America - are refusing to do business with state-licensed dispensaries, for fear of federal prosecution for money-laundering and other federal drug crimes. In a House hearing in December, Rep. Jared Polis of Colorado warned Attorney General Holder that strong-arming banks will actually raise the likelihood of crime. If pot dispensaries have to work outside the normal financial system, Polis told Holder, "it makes the industry harder for the state to track, to tax, to regulate them, and in fact makes it prone to robberies, because it becomes a cash business."
The IRS has also joined in the administration's assault on pot dispensaries, seeking to deny them standard tax deductions enjoyed by all other businesses. Invoking an obscure provision of the tax code meant to trip up drug kingpins, the IRS now maintains that pot dispensaries can deduct only one expense - ironically, the cost of the marijuana itself. All other normal costs of doing business - including employee salaries and benefits, rent, equipment, electricity and water - have been denied.
The agency has used the provision to go after Harborside Health Center, one of the largest and most respected providers of medical cannabis in California. Its Oakland branch, serving 83,000 patients in conforming with state law, paid more than $1 million in city taxes last year - placing it in the top 10 percent of local businesses. "It's incredibly tightly run and very, very professional," says Nadelmann of the Drug Policy Alliance. "But it's also big - and it may be that big is bad as far as the feds are concerned." Slapped with an IRS bill for $2.5 million in back taxes, Harborside now faces bankruptcy. "It's profoundly inaccurate to characterize us as a 'drug-trafficking' organization," says Harborside president Steve DeAngelo. "We are a nonprofit community-service organization that helps sick and suffering people get the medicine they need to be well. This is not an attempt to tax us - it's an attempt to tax us out of existence."
Supporters of medical marijuana are baffled by Obama's abrupt about-face on the issue. Some blame the federal crackdown not on the president, but on career drug warriors determined to go after medical pot. "I don't think the federal onslaught is being driven by the highest levels of the White House," says Nadelmann. "What we need is a clear statement from the White House that federal authorities will defer to responsible local regulation."
The White House, for its part, insists that its position on medical pot has been "clear and consistent." Asked for comment, a senior administration official points out that the Ogden memo was never meant to protect "such things as large-scale, privately owned industrial marijuana cultivation centers" like the one in Oakland. But the official makes no attempt to explain why the administration has permitted a host of federal agencies to revive the Bush-era policy of targeting state-approved dispensaries. "Somewhere in the administration, a decision was made that it would be better to close down legal, regulated systems of access for patients and send them back to the street, back to criminals," says DeAngelo. "That's what's really at stake."
The administration's retreat on medical pot is certainly consistent with its broader election-year strategy of seeking to outflank Republicans on everything from free trade to offshore drilling. Obama's advisers may be betting that a tough-on-pot stance will shore up the president's support among seniors in November, as well as voters in Southern swing states like Virginia and North Carolina that are less favorable to drug reform. But the president could pay a steep price for his anti-pot crackdown this fall, particularly if it winds up alienating young voters in swing states like Colorado, where two-thirds of residents support medical marijuana. In November, Colorado voters will likely consider a referendum to legalize all pot use for adults - and undercutting enthusiasm for the issue will only dampen turnout that could benefit the president. "Medical marijuana is twice as popular as Obama," notes Kampia. "It doesn't make any political sense."
The sharpest and most surprising rebuke to the administration has come from centrist governors who are fed up with the war on medicinal pot. In November, Gregoire and Chafee issued a bipartisan petition to the DEA, asking the agency to reclassify marijuana as a Schedule II drug, the same as cocaine and meth - one with a recognized medicinal value, despite its high potential for abuse. "It's time to show compassion, and it's time to show common sense," says Gregoire. "We call on the federal government to end the confusion and the unsafe burden on patients."
A petition by two sitting governors is historic - but it's unlikely to shift federal policy. Last June, after a nine-year delay, the Obama administration denied a similar petition. An official at the Department of Health and Human Services left little hope for reclassification, reiterating the Bush-era position that there is "no accepted medical use for marijuana in the United States."
For law-enforcement officials who handle marijuana on the front lines, such attitudes highlight how out of touch the administration has become. "Whether you call it medical or recreational, the marijuana genie is out of the bottle, and there's no one who's going to put it back in," insists Sheriff Allman of Mendocino, whose department had been targeted by federal prosecutors for its attempts to regulate medical pot. "For federal officials who plug their ears and say, 'No, it's not true, it's not true,' I have some words for them: You need to get over it."
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |











Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
So, is there really any difference between booze (which is freely available now), and medical marijuana? It seems like they're pretty much the same to me. Now the government is taking it away from those who are seriously sick and who need it.
What a neat way to make sure that you're voted in!
Pot is a thousand times safer than booze, from any point of view you care to take. Booze also has no medical uses. Well, I guess you could disinfect a cut with vodka.
http://moneyedpoliticians.net/2009/03/18/the-drug-war/
Oops, I clicked the green instead of red. Using the term "gangster" here is "too cute." I'm tired of the sly racism.
It's cheaper, too, and could be even cheaper if it ever wins the "war." (It's done a pretty good job fighting back so far}
I agree totally. Check out the good work of Dr. Burzynski and how the FDA has destroyed his practice and the hope for cancer patients. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zBBfN5mQa8
Control, control, control. Follow the money. The major palyers in the drug in =dustry (CIA) need to insure all of this remains totally illegal so the funds never become "public" funds. They control it and the profits go into the few pockets and not the public coffers. When you look at the big picture would it do Tony Soprano any good to see any drug leagalized??
Meanwhile, two Schedule II amphetamines are handed out like candy to kids who ask too many questions in class (the U.S. uses 90-95% of the world's Ritalin and Adderall is illegal in most of the rest of the world). And both state and Federal governments are all to happy to collect taxes on legal tobacco and liquor, which kill hundreds of thousands of Americans every year.
What's wrong with this picture?
In fact, there are 599 "approved" chemical ingredients in each US-blended cigarette. Most are toxic ingredients that are individually classified as dangerous. In the minuscule amount of tobacco (.8 grams) in each cigarette, there is nicotine. Additional nicotine has been approved by the DEA to be added by these "tobacco-product manufacturers" to each cigarette. And what about this nicotine?
As of March 2011, "nicotine found in cigarettes, cigars, bidis, and smokeless tobacco (snuff, spit tobacco, chew)" IS NOT classified as a scheduled drug. SOURCE: http://www.drugabuse.gov/drugs-abuse/commonly-abused-drugs/commonly-abused-drugs-chart
(Continued below...)
If you do some research on those 599 approved additives to cigarettes, you will find that nicotine is not the only substance added to these "manufactured tobacco products" that contributes to this unquestionable addiction, sure illness, and with long use or exposure to second- and third-hand smoke, the death of nearly 500,000 Americans per year, that's 1,200 PER DAY.
I don't know about you, but if the DEA and the FDA are hell-bent to regulate something that is truly harmful, it should NOT be pot...it should be US-blended tobacco products one smokes, because they are KILLING at alarming rates.
Help people; listen to them. More than 70% approve of medical marijuana. Doctors prescribe it.
No one sees "tobacco" products as beneficial in any way, the way they are manufactured today! REGULATE WHAT GOES INTO THEM!!
all about greed, control and keeping the economy in decline and "the people" in their place; but how different is Obama?
Believe me, Capn, Santorum, et al, stand for everything I've fought against my whole life but racial, religious, gay & gender equality matter very little, if we are under the rule of an iron fisted government, & the NDAA.
We already tried this dumb stunt with alcohol. All we accomplished was to provide a black market for criminals. Now drugs are global. There are far more users, more suppliers and worse drugs than in 1970 when this "war" began. We even had to build private prisons to house all our druggies, many of whom would never have touched drugs had Nixon used his head.
There will always be stoners just as there will always be drunks. What you DON'T do is turn drugs into an unregulated and lucrative business for criminals. Now we're stuck, and legalizing all drugs won't happen anytime soon. Lives are being ruined both with drugs and with incarceration. Little effort is being made to help these people because help doesn't make the money that prison does.
Oh My gosh - he has lied to us again. like a typical politician he says Anything to get elected.. So ya obamabots happy now?
power over others.
he says anything to get it - He told us the War on drugs would be a state issue ... he lied.
He told us he would get us our of the wars..he lied (Why do we need yet another billion for Iraq if we aren't there? seriously think about that) he sent an additional 30,000 troops to afganistan, he bombed yet another country - Libya that was no threat to us,
he said the debt would be halved instead is has almost doubled.
"In the case of patent number 6630507, the particular item being patented is a special variety of marijuana: it has had its psychoactive characteristics removed. Same stuff, but no high."
What the Ruling Class fears about marijuana is the revolutionary nature of the consciousness it's use produces: direct experience of the absurdity of patriarchal religion and its father-god, especially his manifest hatred of Nature and Woman and thus of sensuality and sexuality. Indeed the marijuana smoker's consciousness is diametrically opposed to the theocratic dogma with which we are increasingly oppressed: wealth as proof of the father god's favor and managerial or political authority by his divine right.
Thus Barack the Betrayer's anti-pot escalation is of a kind with his cave-in on birth control, also with the GOPorkers' now-openly declared war against free women.
Why? Because decades of research prove Abrahamic fundamentalists (Jews, Christians, Muslims) make the most obedient, productive, dependably anti-union workers, also the most compulsive consumers. They see management edicts as divine law and sublimate forbidden sexuality in fanatical productivity and frantic materialism.
For a more detailed discussion of these issues, see "Dancer Resurrected: a Story of Love, Art, Sex and Revolution" (especially Part 2), on my blog at lorenbliss.typepad.com.
That's it in a nutshell. There is obviously some underlying reason that a non-lethal plant that has been used by humans around the globe for at 4,000 years with no known deaths/overdoses is illegal, and has been the target of such an expensive and ridiculous eradication campaign.
Yes, the profits that the incarceration and related industries reap from the illegality of cannabis is a factor. Additionally, I DO believe Obama is now trying to allow Big Pharma to patent its medicinal applications, but this gubmint "war" goes back decades - there HAS to be something else, something unique to cannabis that the PTB find so threatening. I believe that something is the expansion of consciousness and awareness that marijuana can facilitate.
One can only speculate on what he was offered to sign the NDAA law.
In fact 'they' will probably block the patent for Rx pot too. Well, maybe not since they own the drug companies too. If you've noticed, they've also been taking away the licenses of pain doctors all over the country for writing too many opiate scripts. Now that they have a grip on all that Afganistan opium, they'd rather the desperate patients go to the streets for their pain relief in the form of heroin. Why should regular old doctors get those juicy profits?
"There is no accepted medical use for marijuana in the United States."
WHO SAYS? The same brutal gang that wants to force Smart Meter radiation on you and mandate that children be used in anthrax vaccine studies.
I don't believe Obama is really all that responsible for the reversal in acceptance of medical marijuana, but why appoint a Bush era DFA head?
"Gov. Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island, a former Republican senator who has urged the DEA to legalize medical marijuana..."
The DEA can't legalize, or criminalize, anything. Only Congress can do that. So now we have one more question for congressional candidates and incumbents; "Will you support the decriminalizati on/legalization of marijuana by repealing all federal laws that apply to marijuana?"
It's all about Congress in 2012!
Nothing new! it's all about money and control...and one more thing: WS
By saying good things about Ron Paul on the Internet and having re-registered to the Green Party, I'm hoping to be part of a signal to the Democrats that they need to shape up or end up losing their base that aspires to peace, liberty, and justice for all. I can't "believe in" change that is promised, but not acted upon.
History proves the four prerequisites of revolution are (1)-ideology; (2)-organization and leadership; (3)-access to extant technologies; (4)-the support of a major foreign power.
U.S. dissent has no ideological foundation; that was stolen from us by the postwar purges (1945-1965), the victims not just Marxians but all socialists and indeed any intellectual capable of formulating ideology. Hence there is neither leadership not organization.
But the most crippling deficit is technological: the military -- the Ruling Class goon squad -- has weapons so alien we cannot imagine them, much less figure out how to use them. Hence the seizure of arsenals that fueled other revolutions -- France, Russia, China etc. -- would be an utter failure here: part of the intent behind prohibitively high-tech arms.
Lastly, since the death of the Soviet Union, there is no nation capable of providing the foreign support history proves is essential to revolutionary success.
Any "touch off" would lead directly to massacre of unimaginable proportions, undoubtedly including the neutron-bombing of any U.S. city in rebel hands.
Our only hope to compel change -- a very tiny hope -- is non-violence. Anything else gives the Ruling Class the excuse to enact the Final Solution for which they yearn: extermination of all slaves -- us -- rendered surplus by downsizing, outsourcing, disability and old age.
I would like to discuss the term "de trop" with you in two regards. 1) The objectifying of human beings, treating people as objects that can be thrown away if the government no longer has a need or space for them, which is the "too many" designation I used.
2)In "Le Nausea" Jean Paul Sartre speaks of "de trop" as a matter of contingency due to death being the inescapable fact in the human condition. This is particularly relevant today when we see our government leaders, politicians, & WS conglamorates using any means to acquire massive fortunes, unlimited power & authoritarian control. Sartre would say they're trying to deny/ protect themselves from the nausea he felt when he realized there is nothing in this world that can secure you in the face of death.
The greed and corruption which appears to have no limits, and lack of concern for the deleterious effect it is having on other human beings is very troubling.
The lack of integrity and morality is equally troubling. What happened to ethics, integrity, humanitarianism ? I see none of it in this presidential election fiasco.
No one can rebel in the US. Everyone is policed at just about every minute of their lives. Any opposition is quickly neutralized, most often even before it could get organized.
What will touch off the collapse of the Washington regime is the end of the dollar hegemony. When the rest of the world trades in local currencies rather than the dollar, no one will lend money to the USG. It won't be able to borrow and it cannot tax anymore. It will have to print money and that can only last for a little while.
Remember the Hypocrisy of the the Clintons' who could have legalized and didn't. Our first head feels he will somehow attract the Tea Party stalwarts by busting his fellow users as well as people using cannabis as a sensible medical procedure? How many users are going to hold their noses to vote for such a liar?
Legalization would pull the rug out from under the bloody drug war in Latin America free up jail space and at least the there would be an alternative to the most dangerous addictive drug: alcohol.
What year is this?
I wonder what his minister who was also given the shove ho status early on would say now about everyone's hopes being dashed by one who promised so much freedom. Marijuana has never been a dangerous drug, its just pharms haven't figured out a way to have it for their own but prisons have found a way to feed their addiction to federal (public funds) by lobbying for tougher drug laws so they can fill their prison beds and receive $$$ for every bed they fill.
If Obama wants the Youth Vote he should stop supporting the REAL Human Trafficing Trade through state and federal drug laws that send so many to private prisons!!!!
thing to crack down on Medical M.J. is looney, to say the least, other than to perhaps say, "Ja Vold, Mein Hehr!!!" and march in Lock-step following oahrders...
The force of law is ineffective as a front line tool. But suppose President Obama encouraged people--youth for starters--to stop buying dope. Then started an ongoing dialogue, then followed up 6 months later with a request to stop doing dope and continuing the dialogue.
If people aren't buying dope, the dope economy gets disrupted. If people stop doing dope, their minds are clearer.
You completely forgot about the BIG TOBACCO COMPANIES and their heavy lobby in DC and around the world. Now THERE'S abuse of power and influence, and a good reason why Marijuana is under threat.
And please don't lump the arts and craft of alcohol like fine wines, spirits and well-crafted beer, which are meant to be enjoyed deeply -not as a drug (but the fallibility of humans is always going to be a factor) with the "skid-row" side and the crappy faux-beer soapy water churned out and blanket-marketed by Coors and Budweiser with their huge advertising budgets.
I imagine that the "Underground" weed-economy is microscopic compared to the more devastating drugs pushed by big pharma' and tobacco on the owner-media.
Hell people become addicted to sugary soft drinks and junk food -all more harmful than "Pot".
Never mind.
Think of all the pharmaceuticals that would be no longer needed.Marijuana has little side assects compared to any priscription commercial you have ever seen Most Prescriptions are prescribed to counteract other drugs!!! INSURANCE COMPANIES MAKE MONEY OFF YOUR ILLNESSES! INSURANCE AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES HAVE ALOT OF LOBBYING POWER BECAUSE THEY HAVE BIG MONEY WITH THEM.
We need our sweet healthy grass to help us to survive the economic problems calmly. Too much stress causes more health problems... and more expense for health care. The BIG Pharm have been lying about pot for 100 years... Don't believe them.
Of those, do any of you know of the Bush/Amsterdam contract understand that the seeds once sold thru the Netherlands Neverland were sold out. An agreement signed that heirloom seeds would be abolished as their THC content were not acceptable by Bush/Cheney for a price to Amsterdam. Holland. They allowed genetical engineering of seeds you moron Yuppies went to find that de celerated the THC value. The 'Inbred hydro Koch Bros types just added more chemicals to their Hydri, Smells great for the idiot willing to spend a weeks salary per quarter ounce. The other who believed themslelves addicted to Pot as GOP would like go to nearest 7/10 and buy the cutesy Freeman get high quick.
ovc bs. cute for the Yuppies and other who care less about their kids, but I would rather see the kids smoking the sane crap as the cops then the killing bs they want your kids to buy at the nearest gas station. They can blame the eastern culture that owns the station rather than the lazy sobs that sit collecting a paycheck.
My friends who are living with Science Disease have the right after working, paying taxes, some medical on their own to smoke a pipe of pot,opium or hash. I hope when the others need it, they feel what others feel but of course they have the narc bust shit
Aske them how many die from side affects of THC. I know there are bs facts they use but we have European, Union of convcerned Scietnists, AMA (facts only state no one dies of, euphoric state can eleviaite pain, no anger disorders of employees tested on normal amount of normal THC) did not ask to go to Normal who has better scientific results. After all someone whose child dies of drug overdose will always blame pot, Bloomberg,GOP/TP will push for it.
If we could actually see how much Politicians make from Drugs Legal or non, versus Organic....Well, perhaps you Born Agains would get back to the 60's and see you sold yourselves out not me.
I have in 60 years never seen a terrorist, I am glad. I have also since 70 years here seen anyone on pot anything but nice, good parent. My friends I get out of hospitals from broken bones have spouses/friends who are on drugs or alcohol or both. Drugs are made from chemical powders, legal or not. Now alcohol and chemicals mean death, did before but these new drugs and doctors. Profits before Safety. where is Your Politician, Elected Official, State Regs, EMA//time you found out, eh. After all when is the last time you had a number one hit song??
I'm afraid BO is a lousy negotiator, on who gives way too much in exchange for concessions that evaporate in the morning sun.
Also, as my grandmother used to say, "too clever by half". In the health reform fiasco, he gave up three of the biggest fundamental needs- single-payer, medical marijuana/ending war on drugs, and 'allowing' the federal gov't to negotiate wholesale prices with Big Pharma; in order to get the health insurers to simply not commit their most irrational and egregious outrages (like canceling coverage if you are sick, etc). Plus he forced all americans to sign up for the fraudulent and exorbitant "services" of health-insurers, and if these folks couldn't afford the absurdly high premiums the insurers charge while they maneuver to avoid providing for health care, well then the difference is paid by the taxpayers. Nothing more than a bonanza for the very crooks that are destroying the health and finances of the middle class.
But you have to vote for him, because otherwise, THE BOGEYMAN WILL WIN!
What a crock!
paying a lot more for inferior HC in an inefficient system. We need a Single Payor program which is one more thing Obama betrayed the people on.
RSS feed for comments to this post.