Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Dickinson writes: "Back when he was running for president in 2008, Barack Obama insisted that medical marijuana was an issue best left to state and local governments. But over the past year, the Obama administration has quietly unleashed a multi­agency crackdown on medical cannabis that goes far beyond anything undertaken by George W. Bush."

I'm not going to be using Justice Department resources to try to circumvent state laws on this issue,' vowed presidential candidate Obama in 2008. (photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)
I'm not going to be using Justice Department resources to try to circumvent state laws on this issue,' vowed presidential candidate Obama in 2008. (photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)



Obama's War on Pot

By Tim Dickinson, Rolling Stone

18 February 12

 

In a shocking about-face, the administration has launched a government-wide crackdown on medical marijuana.

ack when he was running for president in 2008, Barack Obama insisted that medical marijuana was an issue best left to state and local governments. "I'm not going to be using Justice Department resources to try to circumvent state laws on this issue," he vowed, promising an end to the Bush administration's high-profile raids on providers of medical pot, which is legal in 16 states and the District of Columbia.

But over the past year, the Obama administration has quietly unleashed a multiagency crackdown on medical cannabis that goes far beyond anything undertaken by George W. Bush. The feds are busting growers who operate in full compliance with state laws, vowing to seize the property of anyone who dares to even rent to legal pot dispensaries, and threatening to imprison state employees responsible for regulating medical marijuana. With more than 100 raids on pot dispensaries during his first three years, Obama is now on pace to exceed Bush's record for medical-marijuana busts. "There's no question that Obama's the worst president on medical marijuana," says Rob Kampia, executive director of the Marijuana Policy Project. "He's gone from first to worst."

The federal crackdown imperils the medical care of the estimated 730,000 patients nationwide - many of them seriously ill or dying - who rely on state-sanctioned marijuana recommended by their doctors. In addition, drug experts warn, the White House's war on law-abiding providers of medical marijuana will only drum up business for real criminals. "The administration is going after legal dispensaries and state and local authorities in ways that are going to push this stuff back underground again," says Ethan Nadelmann, director of the Drug Policy Alliance. Gov. Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island, a former Republican senator who has urged the DEA to legalize medical marijuana, pulls no punches in describing the state of affairs produced by Obama's efforts to circumvent state law: "Utter chaos."

In its first two years, the Obama administration took a refreshingly sane approach to medical marijuana. Shortly after Obama took office, a senior drug-enforcement official pledged to Rolling Stone that the question of whether marijuana is medicine would now be determined by science, "not ideology." In March 2009, Attorney General Eric Holder emphasized that the Justice Department would only target medical-marijuana providers "who violate both federal and state law." The next morning, a headline in The New York Times read OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO STOP RAIDS ON MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSERS. While all forms of marijuana would remain strictly illegal under federal law - the DEA ranks cannabis as a Schedule I drug, on par with heroin - the feds would respect state protections for providers of medical pot. Framing the Obama administration's new approach, drug czar Gil Kerlikowske famously declared, "We're not at war with people in this country."

That original hands-off policy was codified in a Justice Department memo written in October 2009 by Deputy Attorney General David Ogden. The so-called "Ogden memo" advised federal law-enforcement officials that the "rational use of its limited investigative and prosecutorial resources" meant that medical-marijuana patients and their "caregivers" who operate in "clear and unambiguous compliance with existing state law" could be left alone.

At the same time, Ogden was concerned that the feds not "be made a fool of" by illegal drug traffickers. In that vein, his memo advised U.S. attorneys to focus on going after pot dispensaries that posed as medicinal but were actively engaged in criminal acts, such as selling to minors, possession of illegal firearms or money-laundering. The idea, as Holder put it, was to raid only those hardcore traffickers who "use medical-marijuana laws as a shield."

The Ogden memo sent a clear message to the states: The feds will only intervene if you allow pot dispensaries to operate as a front for criminal activity. States from New Mexico to Maine moved quickly to license and regulate dispensaries through their state health departments - giving medical marijuana unprecedented legitimacy. In California, which had allowed "caregivers" to operate dispensaries, medical pot blossomed into a $1.3 billion enterprise - shielded from federal blowback by the Ogden memo.

The administration's recognition of medical cannabis reached its high-water mark in July 2010, when the Department of Veterans Affairs validated it as a legitimate course of treatment for soldiers returning from the front lines. But it didn't take long for the fragile federal detente to begin to collapse. The reversal began at the Drug Enforcement Agency with Michele Leonhart, a holdover from the Bush administration who was renominated by Obama to head the DEA. An anti-medical-marijuana hard-liner, Leonhart had been rebuked in 2008 by House Judiciary chairman John Conyers for targeting dispensaries with tactics "typically reserved for the worst drug traffickers and kingpins." Her views on the larger drug war are so perverse, in fact, that last year she cited the slaughter of nearly 1,000 Mexican children by the drug cartels as a counterintuitive "sign of success in the fight against drugs."

In January 2011, weeks after Leonhart was confirmed, her agency updated a paper called "The DEA Position on Marijuana." With subject headings like THE FALLACY OF MARIJUANA FOR MEDICINAL USE and SMOKED MARIJUANA IS NOT MEDICINE, the paper simply regurgitated the Bush administration's ideological stance, in an attempt to walk back the Ogden memo. Sounding like Glenn Beck, the DEA even blamed "George Soros" and "a few billionaires, not broad grassroots support" for sustaining the medical-marijuana movement - even though polls show that 70 percent of Americans approve of medical pot.

Almost immediately, federal prosecutors went on the attack. Their first target: the city of Oakland, where local officials had moved to raise millions in taxes by licensing high-tech indoor facilities for growing medical marijuana. A month after the DEA issued its hard-line position, U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag warned the city that the feds were weighing "criminal prosecution" against the proposed pot operations. Abandoning the Ogden memo's protections for state-sanctioned "caregivers," Haag effectively re-declared war on medical pot. "We will enforce the Controlled Substances Act vigorously against individuals and organizations that participate in unlawful manufacturing and distribution activity involving marijuana," she wrote, "even if such activities are permitted under state law." Haag's warning shot had the desired effect: Oakland quickly scuttled its plans, even though the taxes provided by the indoor grows could have single-handedly wiped out the city's $31 million deficit.

Two months later, federal prosecutors in Washington state went even further, threatening state employees responsible for implementing new regulations for pot dispensaries. U.S. attorneys sent a letter to Gov. Christine Gregoire, warning that state employees "would not be immune from liability under the Controlled Substances Act." Shocked by the threat - "It subjected Washington state employees to felony criminal prosecution!" - Gregoire vetoed the new rules. A similar federal threat in Rhode Island forced Chafee to follow suit, putting an indefinite hold on the planned opening of three state-licensed "compassion centers" to distribute marijuana to seriously ill patients.

In isolation, such moves might be seen as the work of overzealous U.S. attorneys, who operate with considerable autonomy. But last June, the Justice Department effectively declared that it was returning to the Bush administration's hard-line stance on medical marijuana. James Cole, who had replaced Ogden as deputy attorney general, wrote a memo revoking his predecessor's deference to states on the definition of "caregiver." The term, Cole insisted, applied only to "individuals providing care to individuals with cancer or other serious illnesses, not commercial operations cultivating, selling or distributing marijuana." Pot dispensaries, in short, were once again prime federal targets, even if they were following state law to the letter. "The Cole memo basically adopted the Bush policy," says Kampia, "which was only that the Justice Department will not go after individual patients."

In reality, however, the Obama administration has also put patients in the cross hairs. Last September, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms moved to deprive Americans who use medical marijuana of their gun rights. In an open letter to gun sellers, the ATF warned that it is unlawful to sell "any firearm or ammunition" to "any person who uses or is addicted to marijuana, regardless of whether his or her state has passed legislation authorizing marijuana use for me dicinal purposes." If your doctor advises you to use medicinal pot, in other words, you can no longer legally own a gun. Hunting advocates were outraged. Sen. Jon Tester, a Democrat from Montana, wrote a furious letter calling on the Justice Department to reassess its "chilling" policy, declaring it "unacceptable that law-abiding citizens would be stripped of their Second Amendment rights."

Since the federal crackdown began last year, the DEA has raided dozens of medical-cannabis dispensaries from Michigan to Montana. Haag, the U.S. attorney for Northern California, claims the federal action is necessary because the state's legalized pot dispensaries have been "hijacked by profiteers" who are nothing more than criminals.

It's true that California has no shortage of illegal pot dealers. Nonmedical marijuana is the state's largest cash crop, raking in an estimated $14 billion a year. And demand is growing, in part because former governor Arnold Schwarzenegger thwarted a ballot measure aimed at full legalization in 2010 by removing criminal penalties for possession of up to an ounce of pot. But instead of focusing limited federal resources on off-the-grid growers in places like Humboldt County, who are often armed and violent, Haag targeted Matthew Cohen, a medical-marijuana farmer in Mendocino who was growing 99 plants under the direct supervision of the county sheriff. As part of a pioneering collaboration with local law enforcement, Cohen marked each of his plants with county-supplied tags, had his secured facility inspected and distributed the marijuana he grew directly to patients in his nonprofit collective.

Cohen appeared to be precisely the kind of caregiver that the Ogden memo advised should be given safe harbor for operating in "clear and unambiguous compliance with existing state law." But last October, DEA agents stormed Cohen's farm in the middle of the night and cut down his crop. Sheriff Tom Allman, who learned of the raid on his turf only an hour before it was executed, was outraged. "Matt Cohen was not in violation of any state or local ordinances when federal agents arrived at his location," Allman says. In January, Haag took the fight to the next level, threatening county officials like Allman with federal sanctions. Three weeks later, county supervisors voted to abandon the program to license and monitor Mendocino's legal growers. "This is a huge step backward," says Allman.

Haag's treatment of urban dispensaries has been equally ham-handed. She recently shuttered one of the oldest dispensaries in the state, a nonprofit that serves a high percentage of female patients in Marin County, which has the nation's highest rate of breast cancer. She has threatened to seize the properties that landlords rent to legal pot dispensaries. And in San Francisco, she targeted Divinity Tree, a cooperative run by a quadriplegic who himself relies on prescribed cannabis for relief from near-constant muscle spasms. At a time of high unemployment and huge budget deficits, the move killed more than a dozen jobs and deprived the state of $180,000 in annual tax revenue. In San Diego alone, the feds have shut down nearly two-thirds of the county's dispensaries. Statewide, the United Food and Commercial Workers Union estimates, the federal crackdown has destroyed some 2,500 jobs in California. It also sent street prices soaring by at least 20 percent, putting more money in the hands of actual criminals.

In addition, the federal war on medical marijuana has locked pot dispensaries out of the banking system - especially in Colorado, home to the nation's second-largest market for medicinal cannabis. Top banks - including Chase, Wells Fargo and Bank of America - are refusing to do business with state-licensed dispensaries, for fear of federal prosecution for money-laundering and other federal drug crimes. In a House hearing in December, Rep. Jared Polis of Colorado warned Attorney General Holder that strong-arming banks will actually raise the likelihood of crime. If pot dispensaries have to work outside the normal financial system, Polis told Holder, "it makes the industry harder for the state to track, to tax, to regulate them, and in fact makes it prone to robberies, because it becomes a cash business."

The IRS has also joined in the administration's assault on pot dispensaries, seeking to deny them standard tax deductions enjoyed by all other businesses. Invoking an obscure provision of the tax code meant to trip up drug kingpins, the IRS now maintains that pot dispensaries can deduct only one expense - ironically, the cost of the marijuana itself. All other normal costs of doing business - including employee salaries and benefits, rent, equipment, electricity and water - have been denied.

The agency has used the provision to go after Harborside Health Center, one of the largest and most respected providers of medical cannabis in California. Its Oakland branch, serving 83,000 patients in conforming with state law, paid more than $1 million in city taxes last year - placing it in the top 10 percent of local businesses. "It's incredibly tightly run and very, very professional," says Nadelmann of the Drug Policy Alliance. "But it's also big - and it may be that big is bad as far as the feds are concerned." Slapped with an IRS bill for $2.5 million in back taxes, Harborside now faces bankruptcy. "It's profoundly inaccurate to characterize us as a 'drug-trafficking' organization," says Harborside president Steve DeAngelo. "We are a nonprofit community-service organization that helps sick and suffering people get the medicine they need to be well. This is not an attempt to tax us - it's an attempt to tax us out of existence."

Supporters of medical marijuana are baffled by Obama's abrupt about-face on the issue. Some blame the federal crackdown not on the president, but on career drug warriors determined to go after medical pot. "I don't think the federal onslaught is being driven by the highest levels of the White House," says Nadelmann. "What we need is a clear statement from the White House that federal authorities will defer to responsible local regulation."

The White House, for its part, insists that its position on medical pot has been "clear and consistent." Asked for comment, a senior administration official points out that the Ogden memo was never meant to protect "such things as large-scale, privately owned industrial marijuana cultivation centers" like the one in Oakland. But the official makes no attempt to explain why the administration has permitted a host of federal agencies to revive the Bush-era policy of targeting state-approved dispensaries. "Somewhere in the administration, a decision was made that it would be better to close down legal, regulated systems of access for patients and send them back to the street, back to criminals," says DeAngelo. "That's what's really at stake."

The administration's retreat on medical pot is certainly consistent with its broader election-year strategy of seeking to outflank Republicans on everything from free trade to offshore drilling. Obama's advisers may be betting that a tough-on-pot stance will shore up the president's support among seniors in November, as well as voters in Southern swing states like Virginia and North Carolina that are less favorable to drug reform. But the president could pay a steep price for his anti-pot crackdown this fall, particularly if it winds up alienating young voters in swing states like Colorado, where two-thirds of residents support medical marijuana. In November, Colorado voters will likely consider a referendum to legalize all pot use for adults - and undercutting enthusiasm for the issue will only dampen turnout that could benefit the president. "Medical marijuana is twice as popular as Obama," notes Kampia. "It doesn't make any political sense."

The sharpest and most surprising rebuke to the administration has come from centrist governors who are fed up with the war on medicinal pot. In November, Gregoire and Chafee issued a bipartisan petition to the DEA, asking the agency to reclassify marijuana as a Schedule II drug, the same as cocaine and meth - one with a recognized medicinal value, despite its high potential for abuse. "It's time to show compassion, and it's time to show common sense," says Gregoire. "We call on the federal government to end the confusion and the unsafe burden on patients."

A petition by two sitting governors is historic - but it's unlikely to shift federal policy. Last June, after a nine-year delay, the Obama administration denied a similar petition. An official at the Department of Health and Human Services left little hope for reclassification, reiterating the Bush-era position that there is "no accepted medical use for marijuana in the United States."

For law-enforcement officials who handle marijuana on the front lines, such attitudes highlight how out of touch the administration has become. "Whether you call it medical or recreational, the marijuana genie is out of the bottle, and there's no one who's going to put it back in," insists Sheriff Allman of Mendocino, whose department had been targeted by federal prosecutors for its attempts to regulate medical pot. "For federal officials who plug their ears and say, 'No, it's not true, it's not true,' I have some words for them: You need to get over it."

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+53 # papabob 2012-02-18 14:49
This is another of the examples that started with the Volstead Act, (which was pretty successful as I remember). Oh, a few criminals ran the whole affair, and got fairly rich doing it, but only a few, right? I remember that it required a complicated government machinery to stop the criminals who supplied the booze. (And of course, they still exist, and we're still paying for them).
So, is there really any difference between booze (which is freely available now), and medical marijuana? It seems like they're pretty much the same to me. Now the government is taking it away from those who are seriously sick and who need it.
What a neat way to make sure that you're voted in!
 
 
+47 # Ralph Averill 2012-02-19 03:39
"It seems like they're pretty much the same to me."
Pot is a thousand times safer than booze, from any point of view you care to take. Booze also has no medical uses. Well, I guess you could disinfect a cut with vodka.
 
 
+30 # Capn Canard 2012-02-19 08:07
Obama's war against pot is why nearly everything that the USA stands for is dangerous to the people. A small minority of people use pot(10% to 30%) therefore it is very easy to abuse the users who truly need it. With the intent of getting such people on narcotics instead, narcotics sold by huge political campaign contributors: Big Pharma. This isn't about justice, it is about money, and that is what will bring an end to the USA. Obama is just doing exactly what the Plutocratic Corporate Whores have wanted to do for nearly 200 years! No GOP candidate will do the opposite... I would say that someone like Ron Paul would be immediately assassinated if he were elected president, i.e. the game is rigged and always has been.
 
 
+32 # jlohman 2012-02-19 08:58
We have to get real about the real problem, political corruption. Corrections Corporation of America and other privatized prisons give campaign cash to keep the system broken with 3-strikes laws, minimum sentencing and etc, all to keep our prisons filled. See...

http://moneyedpoliticians.net/2009/03/18/the-drug-war/
 
 
+47 # WFO 2012-02-18 15:02
Just another lie about another war. War is the health of the state.
 
 
+20 # Richard Raznikov 2012-02-18 19:25
For one possible answer for the otherwise inexplicable, check out http://lookingglass.blog.co.uk/2012/02/19/the-curious-case-of-patent-number-12825157/
 
 
+10 # CandH 2012-02-18 19:25
So, that exclusive and almost all white senior citizens housing area called LWorld (look it up,) in Southern CA that had the MM dispensary right in the park--that still going strong? What and how does that survive in this supposed war$ on MM climate that is taking place?
 
 
+74 # Richard Raznikov 2012-02-18 19:29
"No acceptable medical use" for marijuana, at the same time the federal government is applying for patents on it. In the government's patent application, it cites 28 medical and scientific studies which show positive benefits to cannabinoids. Check out the patent application, number 6630507; it's online. Here's the only difference: the government doesn't want anyone obtaining help without a fat profit for the pharmaceutical companies. This is really an ugly story and this President is a fraud.
 
 
+16 # albertchampion 2012-02-18 21:10
fraud? he is a gangster.
 
 
+2 # wwwes 2012-02-18 22:10
Quoting
fraud? he is a gangster.

Oops, I clicked the green instead of red. Using the term "gangster" here is "too cute." I'm tired of the sly racism.
 
 
+26 # Doubter 2012-02-18 22:55
Pot must be hurting the liquor BUSINESS.
It's cheaper, too, and could be even cheaper if it ever wins the "war." (It's done a pretty good job fighting back so far}
 
 
+19 # joestecher 2012-02-19 12:10
No, not the alchol business. However, it is hurting the big pharma. instead of big pills, folks using mj don't put $ in the pockets of the big pharma. I suggest younotice the timing: ab0ut the time the admin started talking with big pharma re the health care reform is the time when they started going after mary jane.
 
 
+18 # Peace Anonymous 2012-02-19 10:00
Quoting
"No acceptable medical use" for marijuana, at the same time the federal government is applying for patents on it. In the government's patent application, it cites 28 medical and scientific studies which show positive benefits to cannabinoids. Check out the patent application, number 6630507; it's online. Here's the only difference: the government doesn't want anyone obtaining help without a fat profit for the pharmaceutical companies. This is really an ugly story and this President is a fraud.

I agree totally. Check out the good work of Dr. Burzynski and how the FDA has destroyed his practice and the hope for cancer patients. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zBBfN5mQa8
Control, control, control. Follow the money. The major palyers in the drug in =dustry (CIA) need to insure all of this remains totally illegal so the funds never become "public" funds. They control it and the profits go into the few pockets and not the public coffers. When you look at the big picture would it do Tony Soprano any good to see any drug leagalized??
 
 
+6 # dorianb@fuse.net 2012-02-19 15:58
Richard Raznikov: "This really is an ugly story and this President is a fraud". You said it and could not be more right! Santorum is totally unacceptable. Obama is a fraud and corrupt. A third party is highly unlikely to win. How do we know who to support and vote for. What do you think?
 
 
+1 # Larkrise 2012-02-27 00:17
I have been saying that Obama is a fraud, when he put in a cabinet of corporate flunkies. I find him totally disingenuous.I will vote for state candidates; but not for Obama.Let the Obamaphiles support him. I could list all of his failures and lies, but I am weary of doing so. He is just another corrupt politician.
 
 
+70 # DaveM 2012-02-18 21:01
I cannot help but wonder how much it has cost the government to pursue this "war" against a drug which has almost certainly never killed anybody (apart from those who got stoned and went for a drive or the like). And how many who truly do benefit from the medicinal use of marijuana are being deprived of an essential medicine.

Meanwhile, two Schedule II amphetamines are handed out like candy to kids who ask too many questions in class (the U.S. uses 90-95% of the world's Ritalin and Adderall is illegal in most of the rest of the world). And both state and Federal governments are all to happy to collect taxes on legal tobacco and liquor, which kill hundreds of thousands of Americans every year.

What's wrong with this picture?
 
 
+30 # NanFan 2012-02-19 03:08
And what's wrong with the picture when you factor in the fact that US-blended tobacco products one LEGALLY can smoke kills...did you get that KILLS...440,000 Americans per year? NO benefit to the smoker, the person exposed to smoke from the products, or to the environment. AND they are highly addictive and are not classified as a drug, overall...did you get that? Something you may legally ingest or be exposed to and can die from is NOT regulated as a harmful product AT ALL! Yet, medical marijuana, prescribed to help those who are ill kills NO ONE and it is NOT addictive, yet classified at the most powerfully harmful drug level.

In fact, there are 599 "approved" chemical ingredients in each US-blended cigarette. Most are toxic ingredients that are individually classified as dangerous. In the minuscule amount of tobacco (.8 grams) in each cigarette, there is nicotine. Additional nicotine has been approved by the DEA to be added by these "tobacco-product manufacturers" to each cigarette. And what about this nicotine?

As of March 2011, "nicotine found in cigarettes, cigars, bidis, and smokeless tobacco (snuff, spit tobacco, chew)" IS NOT classified as a scheduled drug. SOURCE: http://www.drugabuse.gov/drugs-abuse/commonly-abused-drugs/commonly-abused-drugs-chart

(Continued below...)
 
 
+22 # NanFan 2012-02-19 03:17
(Continued from my post above...)

If you do some research on those 599 approved additives to cigarettes, you will find that nicotine is not the only substance added to these "manufactured tobacco products" that contributes to this unquestionable addiction, sure illness, and with long use or exposure to second- and third-hand smoke, the death of nearly 500,000 Americans per year, that's 1,200 PER DAY.

I don't know about you, but if the DEA and the FDA are hell-bent to regulate something that is truly harmful, it should NOT be pot...it should be US-blended tobacco products one smokes, because they are KILLING at alarming rates.

Help people; listen to them. More than 70% approve of medical marijuana. Doctors prescribe it.

No one sees "tobacco" products as beneficial in any way, the way they are manufactured today! REGULATE WHAT GOES INTO THEM!!
 
 
+15 # Capn Canard 2012-02-19 08:12
NanFan, ABSOLUTELY! Damn, this is all about money and wealth and who actually holds that money and wealth. It has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the health and safety of users. And keep in mind that ALCOHOL is a poison. People can easily drink themselves to death in one evening. It is far more difficult to commit suicide with cigarettes in one day or evening.
 
 
+5 # dorianb@fuse.net 2012-02-19 16:30
Capn Canard: You said it! "This is all about money and wealth and who actually holds that money and wealth". This entire election is all about money, fraud and corruption. The Republicans are
all about greed, control and keeping the economy in decline and "the people" in their place; but how different is Obama?
Believe me, Capn, Santorum, et al, stand for everything I've fought against my whole life but racial, religious, gay & gender equality matter very little, if we are under the rule of an iron fisted government, & the NDAA.
 
 
+4 # dorianb@fuse.net 2012-02-19 16:07
Dave M: What's wrong with this picture is the corruption and manipulation of our economy by our government. Obama is no friend of the people. In the words of Richard R, "This President is a fraud".
 
 
+65 # Joan Manning 2012-02-18 21:46
Pot should be in Schedule 3. It's in Sched 1 only because of Richard Nixon who ran for office on public fear of hippies, pot, and LSD.
We already tried this dumb stunt with alcohol. All we accomplished was to provide a black market for criminals. Now drugs are global. There are far more users, more suppliers and worse drugs than in 1970 when this "war" began. We even had to build private prisons to house all our druggies, many of whom would never have touched drugs had Nixon used his head.
There will always be stoners just as there will always be drunks. What you DON'T do is turn drugs into an unregulated and lucrative business for criminals. Now we're stuck, and legalizing all drugs won't happen anytime soon. Lives are being ruined both with drugs and with incarceration. Little effort is being made to help these people because help doesn't make the money that prison does.
 
 
+25 # Ralph Averill 2012-02-19 03:43
A little history. marijuana was made a schedule 1 drug during prohibition. The liquor industry wanted to make sure nobody found a replacement for booze. It was the liquor lobby that created "Killer Weed" myth.
 
 
+24 # rradiof 2012-02-18 22:30
Obama is a pathological liar. His corporate handlers in "Big Pharma", have made informed him that biotech companies have cracked the genome of cannabis sativa (Medicinal Genomics) and will soon breed marijuana with very little THC (that's what gets you high), and like Monsanto with GMOs running traditional farmers out of business, will run traditional growers out of the marijuana business. What would be the IPO of this new corporate pot which will be patented and no doubt will be much more expensive than organic marijuana, and will available only through prescription? "Big Pharma" wins again with the cooperation of their lackey, Barack Obama. Which level of the Inferno has the presidential suite that awaits this pathological prevaricator?
 
 
+19 # grouchy 2012-02-18 22:41
1. Take the total cost of maintaining our stupid policies on the "drug problem" (police, jails, courts,etc) and divide by the number of citizens paying taxes to maintain the system. This will give you the figure for what each of us is paying for the luxury of maintaining such expensive nonsense which will give you what EACH citizen pays. THIS FIGURE SHOULD BE BROADCAST ACROSS THE NATION SO CITIZENS CAN START TO REALIZE WHAT THIS NONSENSE IS COSTING EACH OF US! The figures that typically are given out that are always large are impossible for most citizens to comprehend. They don't typically have to evaluate such large numbers--In comparison to exactly what?
 
 
+14 # Martintfre 2012-02-18 23:08
"I'm not going to be using Justice Department resources to try to circumvent state laws on this issue," he vowed, promising an end "

Oh My gosh - he has lied to us again. like a typical politician he says Anything to get elected.. So ya obamabots happy now?
 
 
+12 # Martintfre 2012-02-18 23:13
Obama is addicted to the most potent narcotic known to man -

power over others.

he says anything to get it - He told us the War on drugs would be a state issue ... he lied.

He told us he would get us our of the wars..he lied (Why do we need yet another billion for Iraq if we aren't there? seriously think about that) he sent an additional 30,000 troops to afganistan, he bombed yet another country - Libya that was no threat to us,

he said the debt would be halved instead is has almost doubled.
 
 
+5 # Doubter 2012-02-20 13:44
I've been wondering why your hate for politicians is so fixated on Obama. To me; a politician is a politician is a politician.
 
 
+24 # vitobonespur 2012-02-18 23:20
I certainly am glad I took the time to read this article because I had actually gotten to a point where I thought things were beginning to look up for a change.
 
 
+26 # wwway 2012-02-18 23:46
Marijuana has been an easy project for law enforcement. More people in CA are encarcerated for Marijuana than any other drug. I say legalize it and let folks grow it like an herb with their tomatoes in the garden. The only regulation that needs to be made is making it illegal to be grown and distributed like tobacco. Just let folks grow it in their home garden like they always did before Nixon made a war on it.
 
 
+36 # lorenbliss 2012-02-18 23:53
The key revelation in Mr. Raznikov's research is this:

"In the case of patent number 6630507, the particular item being patented is a special variety of marijuana: it has had its psychoactive characteristics removed. Same stuff, but no high."

What the Ruling Class fears about marijuana is the revolutionary nature of the consciousness it's use produces: direct experience of the absurdity of patriarchal religion and its father-god, especially his manifest hatred of Nature and Woman and thus of sensuality and sexuality. Indeed the marijuana smoker's consciousness is diametrically opposed to the theocratic dogma with which we are increasingly oppressed: wealth as proof of the father god's favor and managerial or political authority by his divine right.

Thus Barack the Betrayer's anti-pot escalation is of a kind with his cave-in on birth control, also with the GOPorkers' now-openly declared war against free women.

Why? Because decades of research prove Abrahamic fundamentalists (Jews, Christians, Muslims) make the most obedient, productive, dependably anti-union workers, also the most compulsive consumers. They see management edicts as divine law and sublimate forbidden sexuality in fanatical productivity and frantic materialism.

For a more detailed discussion of these issues, see "Dancer Resurrected: a Story of Love, Art, Sex and Revolution" (especially Part 2), on my blog at lorenbliss.typepad.com.
 
 
+13 # AnnaVanZ 2012-02-19 13:34
"What the Ruling Class fears about marijuana is the revolutionary nature of the consciousness its use produces.."

That's it in a nutshell. There is obviously some underlying reason that a non-lethal plant that has been used by humans around the globe for at 4,000 years with no known deaths/overdoses is illegal, and has been the target of such an expensive and ridiculous eradication campaign.

Yes, the profits that the incarceration and related industries reap from the illegality of cannabis is a factor. Additionally, I DO believe Obama is now trying to allow Big Pharma to patent its medicinal applications, but this gubmint "war" goes back decades - there HAS to be something else, something unique to cannabis that the PTB find so threatening. I believe that something is the expansion of consciousness and awareness that marijuana can facilitate.
 
 
+2 # dorianb@fuse.net 2012-02-19 16:48
Obama's HC plan will benefit Big Pharma and Insurance companies and we will be paying for it. I think you are right when you (& lorenbliss) talk about the threat of expanded consciousness & awareness but do not underestimate Obama's association with & indebtedness to WS! In this case as in his HC plan the beneficiaries are Pharma & Insurance
One can only speculate on what he was offered to sign the NDAA law.
 
 
+2 # dorianb@fuse.net 2012-02-19 16:40
Lorenbliss: Soulmate, thank you for the information. I'm going to visit your blog. I said it before & I'll say it again. You are One Smart Woman! If you email me, I'll give you my blog, also.
 
 
+30 # Miss American 2012-02-19 01:18
Someone needs to write this article: "How the 100 broken promises of Obama hurts YOU". The same predatory entity that has hijacked the country and our government is the one keeping the country amply supplied with illegal drugs. One critic's statement that the White House's new stance will "only drum up business for criminals" is spot on. Do you get it yet?? Since you can find any drug, in any town, at any time, ask yourself; could the risky business of smuggling ever be so consistant, for so many years? And the drug used most is what? They simply can't have mom and pop competing with them! Notice that after the bust, pot went up 20%? Profit for "the criminals"! Pot stays a class 1 'narcotic', privately owned prisons stay full! Mr. Cheney and friends thank you.

In fact 'they' will probably block the patent for Rx pot too. Well, maybe not since they own the drug companies too. If you've noticed, they've also been taking away the licenses of pain doctors all over the country for writing too many opiate scripts. Now that they have a grip on all that Afganistan opium, they'd rather the desperate patients go to the streets for their pain relief in the form of heroin. Why should regular old doctors get those juicy profits?

"There is no accepted medical use for marijuana in the United States."

WHO SAYS? The same brutal gang that wants to force Smart Meter radiation on you and mandate that children be used in anthrax vaccine studies.
 
 
+25 # E-Mon 2012-02-19 01:25
Looks like the government runs our lives..... Wait a minute.... I thought we were the government? Didn't I just read that 70% of the people are FOR decriminalizati on, or pro medical pot? Yup! Then, doing the math, something's not adding up here. In a real democracy 51% should be enough tip the scales... Majority rules. Obama smoked pot. He knows what it's all about. It's not addictive, at least not physically like speed or opiates, and it obviously didn't harm his intelligence. The guy's not stupid I'll give him that much. But WOW! This SUCKS in so many ways I lost count. It's becoming blatantly clear that presidents are just puppets being told what to say and do. Sadly, I think JFK was our last hope. He was the last one that actually gave a sh*t about the country and the people, and had the balls to go up against the "machine". Try googleing "Executive Order 11110" He tried to circumvent the power of the (privately owned) Federal Reserve by authorizing the printing of interest free REAL US currency backed by silver. And look what happened to him. His assassination was essentially a coup. I couldn't say for a fact but I'd guess when a new president is elected they're told on day one, you'll be fine if you play by our rules. But if you step out of line you'll be joining JFK in Arlington Cemetery. Obama is being smart. Too bad being smart is soooo ridiculously stupid.
 
 
+20 # unitedwestand 2012-02-19 02:06
It should be pretty clear to every one that keeping marijuana illegal as well as other drugs, is the way the real criminals want it. So the jails stay full and private prisons will profit, the drug enforcement departments and people who work at it including the jail guards will have sure jobs, and the guns can be sold across the border. Some people are real happy with the present situation.

I don't believe Obama is really all that responsible for the reversal in acceptance of medical marijuana, but why appoint a Bush era DFA head?
 
 
+20 # futhark 2012-02-19 02:56
I don't use pot, have never used pot, think it literally stinks, and, as a retired teacher from a high school in California's fabled Greenbud Empire, witnessed firsthand its debilitating effects on adolescent academic achievement. That said, I think the Federal Government has no justifiable role in its regulation. Check the 10th Amendment to the United States Constitution.
 
 
+31 # Ralph Averill 2012-02-19 03:59
I think Big Pharma is leaning on the administration to suppress medical marijuana. The pharmaceutical companies have a lot to loose should marijuana become de-criminalized since pot is a safe and effective alternative to many of their big money makers.
"Gov. Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island, a former Republican senator who has urged the DEA to legalize medical marijuana..."
The DEA can't legalize, or criminalize, anything. Only Congress can do that. So now we have one more question for congressional candidates and incumbents; "Will you support the decriminalizati on/legalization of marijuana by repealing all federal laws that apply to marijuana?"
It's all about Congress in 2012!
 
 
+5 # Kootenay Coyote 2012-02-19 07:29
The Feds have obviously been inhaling something that’s good for nothing.
 
 
+15 # Todd Williams 2012-02-19 07:46
There are several ways to stop this assault on pot: everybody should smoke more pot, refuse drug testing, support your local head shop, grow your own, join NORML and buy High Times Magazine. This is the dumbest non-issue ever. Pot should never have been made illegal and now it should be legalized. Obama is a fool to crack down on weed. It's not even an issue with rednecks, many of whom smoke pot. Silly, silly, silly.
 
 
+1 # dorianb@fuse.net 2012-02-19 16:55
Todd: Obama is not a fool to crack down on weed. He has an agenda and knows exactly what and why he's doing it!
Nothing new! it's all about money and control...and one more thing: WS
 
 
+5 # futhark 2012-02-19 18:30
Find a candidate with positions you really like and support him/her. Don't be caught up in this mind game of not wanting to weaken the chances of the lesser of two evils getting elected. In almost 50 years of voting, I've only voted for the presidential winner twice (both times for Clinton) and have regretted these votes far more than the "wasted" votes I cast for minor party candidates. Let your conscience be your guide, not mainstream media pundits.
 
 
+12 # RMDC 2012-02-19 07:47
Just more proof for one of two things -- either Obama is not in control of his administration and the FBI, Pentagon, CIA, DEA, and the rest do just as they like. Or, he really is behind the enhanced surveillance, prosecution of whistle blowers, rise in the use of drones, mercenaries, special operations terrorists, police at all levels and thus he is the worst president we've ever had so far. This does not mean that a president Gingrich, Romney, or Santorum won't be lots worse. Maybe we can hold off the final and total collapse into fully blown fascism by keeping Obama for another four years. But why bothers. What is another four years of really bad government when the next asshole to sit in the whorehouse might just touch off the fuse that implodes the whole corrupt system.
 
 
+7 # futhark 2012-02-19 12:44
I suspect your second hypothesis is correct: that Mr. Obama actually has his brain conditioned to produce "reward" neurotransmitte rs as he boasts about the successes of his surveillance programs and his drone assassinations. Gingrich, Romney, or Santorum would even worse. All addictions, including addictions to violence and militarism, are ultimately self-destructive.

By saying good things about Ron Paul on the Internet and having re-registered to the Green Party, I'm hoping to be part of a signal to the Democrats that they need to shape up or end up losing their base that aspires to peace, liberty, and justice for all. I can't "believe in" change that is promised, but not acted upon.
 
 
+4 # lorenbliss 2012-02-19 13:29
RMDC, please get real.

History proves the four prerequisites of revolution are (1)-ideology; (2)-organization and leadership; (3)-access to extant technologies; (4)-the support of a major foreign power.

U.S. dissent has no ideological foundation; that was stolen from us by the postwar purges (1945-1965), the victims not just Marxians but all socialists and indeed any intellectual capable of formulating ideology. Hence there is neither leadership not organization.

But the most crippling deficit is technological: the military -- the Ruling Class goon squad -- has weapons so alien we cannot imagine them, much less figure out how to use them. Hence the seizure of arsenals that fueled other revolutions -- France, Russia, China etc. -- would be an utter failure here: part of the intent behind prohibitively high-tech arms.

Lastly, since the death of the Soviet Union, there is no nation capable of providing the foreign support history proves is essential to revolutionary success.

Any "touch off" would lead directly to massacre of unimaginable proportions, undoubtedly including the neutron-bombing of any U.S. city in rebel hands.

Our only hope to compel change -- a very tiny hope -- is non-violence. Anything else gives the Ruling Class the excuse to enact the Final Solution for which they yearn: extermination of all slaves -- us -- rendered surplus by downsizing, outsourcing, disability and old age.
 
 
+1 # dorianb@fuse.net 2012-02-19 17:20
Lorenbliss: What you are saying is "we" the people are "de trop". I said some-thing similar in another Post. If the wealth & control of production is being aggregated at the top amongst the 1%. A large group of people are no longer needed to produce goods. Those in control have banned together & come up with more efficient & less costly means of production than "people", such as tech. equipment, computers, robotics, & cheap, global labor. The people who depended on laboring to make a living wage will no longer be able to find work or make a living. What becomes of them? They're "de trop".
 
 
+4 # lorenbliss 2012-02-19 23:25
dorianb: how appropriate you use a term from pre-Revolutionary French ("too many") to describe the plight of today's sans culottes. The real irony though is how the United States -- brought into being by pre-Revolutionary France (another example of how a revolution cannot succeed without help from a foreign power) -- has indeed become today's equivalent of (you guessed it!) -- pre-Revolutionary France.
 
 
+1 # dorianb@fuse.net 2012-02-20 13:27
Lorenbliss: Thank you for sharing your brilliant comments which never cease to amaze me. I am in the process of going over your Website readings but would like to dialogue with you on specific subjects. You can contact me by email, if you have the time and interest.

I would like to discuss the term "de trop" with you in two regards. 1) The objectifying of human beings, treating people as objects that can be thrown away if the government no longer has a need or space for them, which is the "too many" designation I used.
2)In "Le Nausea" Jean Paul Sartre speaks of "de trop" as a matter of contingency due to death being the inescapable fact in the human condition. This is particularly relevant today when we see our government leaders, politicians, & WS conglamorates using any means to acquire massive fortunes, unlimited power & authoritarian control. Sartre would say they're trying to deny/ protect themselves from the nausea he felt when he realized there is nothing in this world that can secure you in the face of death.

The greed and corruption which appears to have no limits, and lack of concern for the deleterious effect it is having on other human beings is very troubling.
The lack of integrity and morality is equally troubling. What happened to ethics, integrity, humanitarianism ? I see none of it in this presidential election fiasco.
 
 
+1 # RMDC 2012-02-20 16:41
lorenbliss -- you are right. Revolution in the US is impossible for all the reasons you cite. All I said was that the USG will collapse under the weight of its own corruption. The US will disintegrate somewhat like the USSR did -- although it is important to note that Yeltsin had a lot of help from the CIA. The US will break up into many smaller states and the Washington regime will be only a bad memory of a fascist and imperialist monster that choked to death on its own gorge.

No one can rebel in the US. Everyone is policed at just about every minute of their lives. Any opposition is quickly neutralized, most often even before it could get organized.

What will touch off the collapse of the Washington regime is the end of the dollar hegemony. When the rest of the world trades in local currencies rather than the dollar, no one will lend money to the USG. It won't be able to borrow and it cannot tax anymore. It will have to print money and that can only last for a little while.
 
 
0 # dorianb@fuse.net 2012-02-19 16:57
RMDC: Your answer is in your second Sentence.
 
 
+8 # cordleycoit 2012-02-19 07:48
Remember that Feds are heads. Which means they profit from enforcement and would become unemployable if they lost their job hauling weed around the globe.
Remember the Hypocrisy of the the Clintons' who could have legalized and didn't. Our first head feels he will somehow attract the Tea Party stalwarts by busting his fellow users as well as people using cannabis as a sensible medical procedure? How many users are going to hold their noses to vote for such a liar?
Legalization would pull the rug out from under the bloody drug war in Latin America free up jail space and at least the there would be an alternative to the most dangerous addictive drug: alcohol.
 
 
+16 # angelfish 2012-02-19 08:43
Medical Marijuana is just that, MEDICAL! The Feds have no business meddling into the health care decisions of SOME Patients who can and do benefit from it's use. If an M.D. prescribes it for a viable MEDICAL reason, the Feds should sit down and SHUT UP!
 
 
+17 # chinaski 2012-02-19 08:51
What country is this?
What year is this?
 
 
+4 # Nick Reynolds 2012-02-19 11:16
What a worthless president! I will not be voting for him under any circumstances I can, right now, imagine. I hate to vote for the nitwit Republicans. I'll probably just write in Ron Paul. Obama's failed miserably. He's as bad as Bush. Forget him.
 
 
+3 # Nick Reynolds 2012-02-19 11:17
It's twenty-twelve, the year, not of doom, but of cataclysmic change.
 
 
+16 # Lgagliano 2012-02-19 09:04
I'm sick of Obama selling out on the American people. As excited as I was at what it would mean to elect a president of color, he was never my first choice because of his track record. When I cast my vote for him by default I hoped he would prove my skeptiicism wrong. Unfortunately all my concerns have come to pass and then some. As predicted, now that it's more politically advantageous to go after MMJ than not- he's playing that card. It also wouldn't surprise me at all if he's rolling over for his guys in big pharma- he's already done that, why not stay in bed with them?. Yep- he doesn't have the strength or skills to stand up for the people and it's just f'in sad.
 
 
+14 # Jumpstart 2012-02-19 10:32
If Obama really wants to win reelection and get out the youth vote, his number one priority should be the decriminalizati on of the felony status assigned to marijuana arrests, (this is not the hardline cocaine or other drugs) which states like Florida have found a boom of free labor for private prisons creating again "economic slavery of youth (he should watch the pbs special on young blacks being rounded up in the south and put in prison on small charges to have a free cheap labor in the 1800s after the civil war) now being revived through small drug arrests. Its unimaginable the things the President now seems to be approving towards a prison and military state.
I wonder what his minister who was also given the shove ho status early on would say now about everyone's hopes being dashed by one who promised so much freedom. Marijuana has never been a dangerous drug, its just pharms haven't figured out a way to have it for their own but prisons have found a way to feed their addiction to federal (public funds) by lobbying for tougher drug laws so they can fill their prison beds and receive $$$ for every bed they fill.

If Obama wants the Youth Vote he should stop supporting the REAL Human Trafficing Trade through state and federal drug laws that send so many to private prisons!!!!
 
 
+7 # chuckw38 2012-02-19 10:51
I also voted for the guy to some now proven, by Barack, disappointment.... This latest
thing to crack down on Medical M.J. is looney, to say the least, other than to perhaps say, "Ja Vold, Mein Hehr!!!" and march in Lock-step following oahrders...
 
 
-15 # The Voice of Reason 2012-02-19 11:25
The problem with pot and alcohol is that people profit from these substances. Alcohol is a drug, pot affects consciousness. People do not need alcohol or pot, but the use them is prevalent.

The force of law is ineffective as a front line tool. But suppose President Obama encouraged people--youth for starters--to stop buying dope. Then started an ongoing dialogue, then followed up 6 months later with a request to stop doing dope and continuing the dialogue.

If people aren't buying dope, the dope economy gets disrupted. If people stop doing dope, their minds are clearer.
 
 
+13 # vitobonespur 2012-02-19 13:27
Gee, what a great idea! I think your message should be delivered to all American households by the Easter Bunny, along with the colorful eggs and candy he brings.
 
 
+13 # SOF 2012-02-19 20:01
Your voice is not informed. Have you cared for a cancer patient who is literally wasting away from malnutrition because she can't keep anything down due the nausea from the pharmaceutical drugs.? Doctors would say there was nothing they could do. Marijuana helps people feel better and have an appetite. Patients with other severe diseases are helped, as well as painful problems that come with age. I don't wish that on you. Unless you really don't care about others. If you trust pharma to come up with something as good, you're a fool. And NO ONE wants youth smoking pot.
 
 
+3 # reiverpacific 2012-02-20 09:12
Quoting
The problem with pot and alcohol is that people profit from these substances. Alcohol is a drug, pot affects consciousness. People do not need alcohol or pot, but the use them is prevalent.

The force of law is ineffective as a front line tool. But suppose President Obama encouraged people--youth for starters--to stop buying dope. Then started an ongoing dialogue, then followed up 6 months later with a request to stop doing dope and continuing the dialogue.

If people aren't buying dope, the dope economy gets disrupted. If people stop doing dope, their minds are clearer.

You completely forgot about the BIG TOBACCO COMPANIES and their heavy lobby in DC and around the world. Now THERE'S abuse of power and influence, and a good reason why Marijuana is under threat.
And please don't lump the arts and craft of alcohol like fine wines, spirits and well-crafted beer, which are meant to be enjoyed deeply -not as a drug (but the fallibility of humans is always going to be a factor) with the "skid-row" side and the crappy faux-beer soapy water churned out and blanket-marketed by Coors and Budweiser with their huge advertising budgets.
I imagine that the "Underground" weed-economy is microscopic compared to the more devastating drugs pushed by big pharma' and tobacco on the owner-media.
Hell people become addicted to sugary soft drinks and junk food -all more harmful than "Pot".
 
 
+14 # davehaze 2012-02-19 11:58
This wouldn't be happening if the Democrats were in the White House. What?
Never mind.
 
 
+13 # dazme2u2 2012-02-19 12:06
PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES DO NOT WANT MARIJUANA MADE LEGAL!
Think of all the pharmaceuticals that would be no longer needed.Marijuana has little side assects compared to any priscription commercial you have ever seen Most Prescriptions are prescribed to counteract other drugs!!! INSURANCE COMPANIES MAKE MONEY OFF YOUR ILLNESSES! INSURANCE AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES HAVE ALOT OF LOBBYING POWER BECAUSE THEY HAVE BIG MONEY WITH THEM.
 
 
+7 # jmillay 2012-02-19 12:50
For all the things we need Obama to do to combat the Republican clowns debating birth control around the country, he could lose the election over this one issue. WAKE UP Obama!
We need our sweet healthy grass to help us to survive the economic problems calmly. Too much stress causes more health problems... and more expense for health care. The BIG Pharm have been lying about pot for 100 years... Don't believe them.
 
 
+7 # E-Mon 2012-02-19 14:21
Ron Paul for president. He wants to end the drug war and free all prisoners arrested for non-violent drug related "crimes" like possession.
 
 
0 # Nick Reynolds 2012-02-19 16:16
He must have just received a large contribution for the alcohol industry. What a disappointment.
 
 
-2 # SOF 2012-02-19 20:11
Actually he's been consistent on that -and on ending wars, Tho he's still scary. After NDAA, he's becoming the lesser evil.
 
 
0 # KittatinyHawk 2012-02-19 19:48
Of all of you who have posted, have one of you a disease that could benefit from the use of Medical? Probably less than 1% here at all know what I mean about the actual usage of medical mj.
Of those, do any of you know of the Bush/Amsterdam contract understand that the seeds once sold thru the Netherlands Neverland were sold out. An agreement signed that heirloom seeds would be abolished as their THC content were not acceptable by Bush/Cheney for a price to Amsterdam. Holland. They allowed genetical engineering of seeds you moron Yuppies went to find that de celerated the THC value. The 'Inbred hydro Koch Bros types just added more chemicals to their Hydri, Smells great for the idiot willing to spend a weeks salary per quarter ounce. The other who believed themslelves addicted to Pot as GOP would like go to nearest 7/10 and buy the cutesy Freeman get high quick.
ovc bs. cute for the Yuppies and other who care less about their kids, but I would rather see the kids smoking the sane crap as the cops then the killing bs they want your kids to buy at the nearest gas station. They can blame the eastern culture that owns the station rather than the lazy sobs that sit collecting a paycheck.
My friends who are living with Science Disease have the right after working, paying taxes, some medical on their own to smoke a pipe of pot,opium or hash. I hope when the others need it, they feel what others feel but of course they have the narc bust shit
 
 
+1 # KittatinyHawk 2012-02-19 20:00
Added,,ask your Local Rep, Local Senator what they would do if they would do if they had a disease. Have a handy list of drugs, side affects, and % of those who are affected or die from side affects.

Aske them how many die from side affects of THC. I know there are bs facts they use but we have European, Union of convcerned Scietnists, AMA (facts only state no one dies of, euphoric state can eleviaite pain, no anger disorders of employees tested on normal amount of normal THC) did not ask to go to Normal who has better scientific results. After all someone whose child dies of drug overdose will always blame pot, Bloomberg,GOP/TP will push for it.
If we could actually see how much Politicians make from Drugs Legal or non, versus Organic....Well, perhaps you Born Agains would get back to the 60's and see you sold yourselves out not me.

I have in 60 years never seen a terrorist, I am glad. I have also since 70 years here seen anyone on pot anything but nice, good parent. My friends I get out of hospitals from broken bones have spouses/friends who are on drugs or alcohol or both. Drugs are made from chemical powders, legal or not. Now alcohol and chemicals mean death, did before but these new drugs and doctors. Profits before Safety. where is Your Politician, Elected Official, State Regs, EMA//time you found out, eh. After all when is the last time you had a number one hit song??
 
 
+6 # Stephen 2012-02-20 10:51
I think one of the comments probably got it right- the assault on medical marijuana began after he cut the deal with Big Pharma to support the health-insurance 'reform'.

I'm afraid BO is a lousy negotiator, on who gives way too much in exchange for concessions that evaporate in the morning sun.

Also, as my grandmother used to say, "too clever by half". In the health reform fiasco, he gave up three of the biggest fundamental needs- single-payer, medical marijuana/ending war on drugs, and 'allowing' the federal gov't to negotiate wholesale prices with Big Pharma; in order to get the health insurers to simply not commit their most irrational and egregious outrages (like canceling coverage if you are sick, etc). Plus he forced all americans to sign up for the fraudulent and exorbitant "services" of health-insurers, and if these folks couldn't afford the absurdly high premiums the insurers charge while they maneuver to avoid providing for health care, well then the difference is paid by the taxpayers. Nothing more than a bonanza for the very crooks that are destroying the health and finances of the middle class.

But you have to vote for him, because otherwise, THE BOGEYMAN WILL WIN!

What a crock!
 
 
+4 # dorianb@fuse.net 2012-02-20 13:35
You said it, Stephen. His health care program will benefit the Big Pharm and Insurance companies and WS. We will be
paying a lot more for inferior HC in an inefficient system. We need a Single Payor program which is one more thing Obama betrayed the people on.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.