Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "By using scanners such as the Terahertz Imagining detectors, New Yorkers will be forced to endure more than just an unknown number of eyes prying under their clothes. The consequences could be biologically catastrophic, with the scanning technique tied to problems with the human body's ability to operate."

NYPD and the Department of Defense are using infrared technology to scan citizens. NYPD Commissioner Ray Kelly says the gadget will be mounted on NYPD vans with 'the infrared rays shooting up the street at the person.' (photo: public domain)
NYPD and the Department of Defense are using infrared technology to scan citizens. NYPD Commissioner Ray Kelly says the gadget will be mounted on NYPD vans with 'the infrared rays shooting up the street at the person.' (photo: public domain)



NYPD, Pentagon to Place Mobile Scanners on Streets of NYC

By RT.com

20 January 12

 

ew York City’s war on freedom could be adding a new weapon to its arsenal, especially if NYPD Commissioner Ray Kelly has his say.

The head of the New York Police Department is working with the Pentagon to secure body scanners to be used throughout the Big Apple.

If Kelly gets his wish, the city will be receiving a whole slew of Terahertz Imagining Detection scanners, a high-tech radiation detector that measures the energy that is emitted from a persons’ body. As CBS News reports, "It measures the energy radiating from a body up to 16 feet away, and can detect anything blocking it, like a gun."

What it can also do, however, is allow the NYPD to conduct illegal searches by means of scanning anyone walking the streets of New York. Any object on your person could be privy to the eyes of the detector, and any suspicious screens can prompt police officers to search someone on suspicion of having a gun, or anything else under their clothes.

According to Commissioner Kelly, the scanners would only be used in "reasonably suspicious circumstances," but what constitutes "suspicious" in the eyes of the NYPD could greatly differ from what the 8 million residents of the five boroughs have in mind.

The American Civil Liberties Union has already questioned the NYPD over what they say is an unnecessary precaution that raises more issues than it solves.

"It’s worrisome. It implicates privacy, the right to walk down the street without being subjected to a virtual pat-down by the Police Department when you’re doing nothing wrong," Donna Lieberman of the NYCLU says to CBS.

The scanners also raise the question of whether such searches would even be legal under the US Constitution. Under the Fourth Amendment, Americans are protected from unreasonable searches and seizures. Does scoping out what’s on someone’s person fall under the same category as a hands-on frisk, though?

To the NYPD, it might not matter. In the first quarter of 2011, more than 161,000 innocent New Yorkers were stopped and interrogated on the streets of the city. Figures released by the NYPD in May of last year revealed that of the over 180,000 stop-and-frisk encounters reported by the police department, 88 percent of them ended in neither an arrest nor a summons, leading many to assume that New York cops are already going above and beyond the law by searching seemingly anyone they chose. Additionally, of those 161,000-plus victims, around 84 percent were either black or Latino. At the time, the ACLU’s Lieberman wrote, "The NYPD is turning black and brown neighborhoods across New York City into Constitution-free zones."

Given the alarming statistics, many already feel that officers within the ranks of the NYPD are overzealous with their monitoring of New Yorkers, regularly stopping them for unknown suspicions that nearly nine-out-of-ten times prove false. With the installation of the Terahertz Imagining Detection scanners though, those invasive physical searches wouldn’t just be replaced with a touchless, more intrusive monitoring, but will only allow New Yorkers one more reason to fear walking the streets.

"If they search you, you’re not giving consent, so they can do what they want, meaning they can use that as an excuse to search you for other means. I don’t think that’s constitutional at all," New Yorker Devan Thomas tells CBS.

"There are a lot of cameras already here, so as people walk they’re being filmed. And most of the time they don’t know it," adds Jennifer Bailly.

A lot is somewhat of an understatement. In Manhattan alone there are over 2,000 surveillance cameras, public and private, aimed at every passerby. That number is the same as the tally of both McDonalds and Starbucks on the island, combined, multiplied by a factor of eight.

CBS News adds that the plan puts the NYPD in direct cooperation with the Department of Defense, who is working on testing the scanners to find a way to bring them to the streets. Such a joint effort opens up questions about other endeavors the Pentagon could have planned out with the NYPD in the past, and certainly doesn’t mark the first time that New York’s boys in blue have worked hand-in-hand with federal agencies. Last year a report surfaced linking the NYPD to the CIA, as documents became available showing a connection between the local police department and government spies installing secret agents into Muslim majority communities in New York.

By using scanners such as the Terahertz Imagining detectors, however, New Yorkers will be forced to endure more than just an unknown number of eyes prying under their clothes. The consequences could be biologically catastrophic, with the scanning technique tied to problems with the human body’s ability to operate. According to MIT’s Technology Review, the THz waves used by the scanners "unzip double-stranded DNA, creating bubbles in the double strand that could significantly interfere with processes such as gene expression and DNA replication."

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+20 # azrealazitgetz 2012-01-20 07:55
Just the governments way if trying new things out on the people of the united states. Sucks, but what ya gonna do..? Can't fight em, can't hide from em... There probably gonna see this and start watching me for all I know... But one thing I do know is, one day it's gonna come down to where there is no government, I'll be dead... But it's gonna happen, then sianara ya money hungry people pushing no good people...
 
 
+17 # John Locke 2012-01-20 11:21
azrealazitgetz: This can and will be stopped if we still have a 4th Amendment, and I do think the Supreme Court would go against this on several fronts, first the 4th Amendment, then the 5th Amendment: Not forgetting the Federal Government overstepping its role...I wonder if the people of New York will resist this, or if they are really in favor of it to protect those who work on Wall Street,
 
 
+40 # tedrey 2012-01-20 08:18
This is like those children's puzzles where you're told to find ten things wrong with this picture. Illegalities, immoralities, and stupidities throughout. I'll add an eleventh; police shootings of the type, "I thought it was a gun," will go way up.
 
 
+27 # Granny Weatherwax 2012-01-20 09:29
The only reason I could find for the NYPD or the DoD to deploy these kinds of tools is that they gear up ahead of a coming revolution.
 
 
+30 # in deo veritas 2012-01-20 09:31
Is anybody surprised by this? These fascist bastards have no concern for the health or survival of the people they are supposed to serve and protect. No doubt the bean counters figure a large majority of the people at risk are disposable (homeless, welfare recipients,the elderly, potential perps, etc.).
 
 
+32 # Valleyboy 2012-01-20 09:32
America continues it's steady slide into fascism...
 
 
+14 # DaveM 2012-01-20 10:22
Anyone else out there remember "Escape From New York"? It's getting closer....
 
 
+15 # reiverpacific 2012-01-20 10:35
As Billy Connoly (Scotland's George Carlin) once said "Aye, my mother used tae insist that we wear wear nice clean underwear in case ye are in an accident and end up in hospital"! heh-heh!
I hope that they enjoy everybody's skid-marks and covert transvestite revelations. Imagine J. Edgar Hoover approving this one!
I laff in their faces and fart in their cameras and scanners!
 
 
+8 # MylesJ 2012-01-20 11:31
We used to go to NYC for an art museum fix. I guess this means next time it will be a trip to the Getty instead.
 
 
+7 # sandyboy 2012-01-20 12:07
Reiverpacific: and as Billy Connolly once sang, 'Last Train To Glasgow Central' (to the tune of 'Last Train To San Fernando') - you can all move to Scotland. Plenty of space in the Highlands and the Scots government won't be having scanners I'm sure! Run, don't walk, to Loch Lomond if you value your double strand DNA!!!!
 
 
+4 # reiverpacific 2012-01-20 15:19
Quoting
Reiverpacific: and as Billy Connolly once sang, 'Last Train To Glasgow Central' (to the tune of 'Last Train To San Fernando') - you can all move to Scotland. Plenty of space in the Highlands and the Scots government won't be having scanners I'm sure! Run, don't walk, to Loch Lomond if you value your double strand DNA!!!!

Heh-heh!
I intend to go back but when it's my idea -I like a bit o' a scrap with the reactionaries here betimes. For fun, I might just wear my kilt and the wee badger handbag (now called "Fanny packs) to tease them a bit (Imagine them scannin' my sporran for "Terrorist materials?).
Old Scottish saying: "Is anything worn under the kilt?" answer: "Nah, it's all in perfect workin' order!"
 
 
+11 # earnestjax 2012-01-20 13:10
Remember when we Americans used to feel genuine concern and even amusement at the fate of other countries for the sad ways they had to live, like armed guards at the airport, being subject to whimsical search and seizure, being bugged/tapped in private conversations...we have gone from the sublime to the ridiculous! What's even "funnier" is if I decided to walk down the NYC street naked to save them the trouble of scanning my butt, I'd still get arrested...well, as the guy said in the video I watched about SOPA and PIPA, perhaps we are NOT only passive couch potatoes and will participate in our being corralled like sheep to rise up against the insidious attacks on our morale and liberties.
 
 
+6 # Rick Levy 2012-01-20 17:33
This is a terrible idea. What's next, stop and body cavity searches?
 
 
+5 # sandyboy 2012-01-20 17:56
Reiverpacific: heh-heh indeed. To paraphrase another old song, 'We take the high road, and government takes the low road'! Sad that it always seems to be that way. That's not a gun in my sporran, officer, I'm just glad to see you!
 
 
+1 # reiverpacific 2012-01-21 04:29
Quoting
Reiverpacific: heh-heh indeed. To paraphrase another old song, 'We take the high road, and government takes the low road'! Sad that it always seems to be that way. That's not a gun in my sporran, officer, I'm just glad to see you!

Good one (evil chuckle)!
 
 
+3 # RMDC 2012-01-21 09:27
This country is so weird. In some states it is legal to carry concealed weapons. What good would the Police/Pentagon scanners do in Phoeniz, AZ, where lots of people carry guns. Is there any more or less reason to carry a gun in Phoenix than in NYC? In the states that permit carrying guns, the presumption is that gun carriers are not criminals. They are against the criminals. So in NYC the presumption is that gun carriers are criminals? And if you are visiting from a gun state, do you convert from being a non-criminal to a criminal.

It used to be thought that using the military to police cities was a hallmark of fascism or dictatorship. That's how it worked in third world dictatorships. Now is it common here in the US. And yet we have idiots in the media and government who still criticize other nations. They should open their eyes.
 
 
+1 # ericlipps 2012-01-21 13:11
Something's not right here. If the scanners merely "measure" the radiations naturally emitted by the body, there should be no health issues, any more than there are from such things as thermal imaging, which "sees" by infrared. If they're bouncing artificial radiations off the body, radar style, that's more than mere "measurement." If he government wants people to support its use of scanners on public streets, it needs to at least be honest about how they work.
 
 
+4 # RMDC 2012-01-21 17:37
It is not very likely that the government who plans something like this would be honest about its health hazards. Fascists are not known for being honest.
 
 
+1 # Andrew Hansen 2012-01-21 17:44
It will be tested and soon. The indicator (of the gov) will be the outcome. There is no doubt it is unconstitutiona l. The question is how the court will [be told to] rule.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.