Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Intro: "News International announced on Thursday that it is closing the News of the World after this Sunday's edition, with no end in sight to the political and commercial fallout from the phone-hacking scandal after 72 hours of mounting crisis."

Rupert Murdoch's tabloid has been forced to close in the aftermath of political and commercial fallout from a phone-hacking scandal, 07/07/11. (photo: Guardian UK)
Rupert Murdoch's tabloid has been forced to close in the aftermath of political and commercial fallout from a phone-hacking scandal, 07/07/11. (photo: Guardian UK)




Murdoch Forced to Close UK Paper as Scandal Rages

By James Robinson, Kirsty Scott and Mark Sweney, Guardian UK

07 July 11

 

News of the World axed by News International. Sunday edition of Murdoch's tabloid to be last in the aftermath of political and commercial fallout from phone-hacking scandal.

ews International announced on Thursday that it is closing the News of the World after this Sunday's edition, with no end in sight to the political and commercial fallout from the phone-hacking scandal after 72 hours of mounting crisis.

Sunday's edition of the paper will be the last, News International chairman James Murdoch told News of the World staff on Thursday afternoon.

Murdoch told employees at the 167-year-old title: "The News of the World is in the business of holding others to account. But it failed to when it came to itself."

Murdoch said in a statement: "Wrongdoers turned a good newsroom bad and this was not fully understood or adequately pursued."

Murdoch also conceded the company had "made statements to parliament without being in full possession of the facts. This was wrong."

He said "the News of the World and News International wrongly maintained that these issues were confined to one reporter" and that the company had passed information to the police which would demonstrate this.

"Those who acted wrongly will have to face the consequences," he said.

Murdoch also said in his statement to staff that he had authorised out-of-court payments to victims of hacking: "I now know that I did not have a complete picture when I did so."

He added: "That was wrong and is a matter of serious regret."

It is the first national newspaper to close since Rupert Murdoch shut News International mid-market tabloid Today in 1995.

The News of the World was Rupert Murdoch's first UK newspaper acquisition in 1968 and its profits helped him build his publishing and broadcasting empire in this country and the US.

The title remains the UK's biggest-selling Sunday paper, with a circulation of 2.66m in May this year. In 1962, when the Audit Bureau of Circulations began publishing regular newspaper sales figures, the News of the World was selling 6.66m.

A spokesman for the company would not comment on whether News International will continue to publish a tabloid title on a Sunday.

The News of the World has been NI's most profitable title for many years.

There are already industry rumours that the News of the World's stablemate the Sun could be turned into a seven-day operation. News International has already announced plans to move to seven-day working across its four titles - the Sun, News of the World, the Times and Sunday Times - and the internet domain name thesunonsunday.co.uk was registered two days ago, although the purchaser's identity is unclear.

Murdoch told staff some of them would be leaving the company and said that was a matter of regret. He paid tribute to their "good work."

There will be no adverts in Sunday's edition and any money already received will be donated to good causes.

The closure of the paper is a dramatic move designed to assuage public anger at shocking revelations about the behaviour of its journalists, but it is unlikely that NI's printing presses will be left idle on a Sunday.

Sky News reported that NI chief executive Rebekah Brooks was in tears as she told staff the title is to close.

Labour MP Tom Watson, who has been highlighting the phone-hacking scandal at the paper for two years, said: "Rupert Murdoch did not close the News of the World. It is the revulsion of families up and down the land as to what they got up to. It was going to lose all its readers and it had no advertisers left. They had no choice."

The News of the World, which has averaged about £660,000 in advertising income each weekend so far this year according to industry estimates, was already facing a widespread advertiser boycott on Sunday.

A revolt by advertisers gathered pace in the past 24 hours as Prime Minister David Cameron announced public inquiries into phone hacking and criticism of the paper's activities mounted from politicians and the general public.

There were also the first signs of a possible boycott by readers, with one independent convenience chain admitting on Thursday that it would not be stocking the title in its five stores across Essex and Cambridgeshire. The owner said he took the decision because one of his shops, at Ely station, is close to Soham where Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman were murdered.

Earlier this week it was alleged that Glenn Mulcaire, the private detective formerly employed by the paper, may have hacked into the phones of Wells and Chapman's parents.

The number of alleged phone-hacking incidents perpetrated by the paper in years gone by had also continued to grow, with the latest involving families of members of the armed forces killed in Iraq and Afghanistan. More details were also emerging about alleged payments by News of the World journalists to Metropolitan police officers.

Most NoW advertisers, including Sainsbury's, Asda, Dixons, Boots, Specsavers, Ford, Halifax, Co-op and Npower had already pulled their campaigns. It is understood News International only had four left - BSkyB, British Gas, Mars and Tesco.

The decision to close the paper is understood to have come following a meeting on Thursday between executives including Murdoch, who is also the deputy chief operating officer of NI-owner News Corp and oversees the UK business, Brooks, and the publisher's commercial managing director, Paul Hayes.

Rival publishers were said by media buying agency sources to be descending on advertisers like "ambulance chasers" looking to snap up potentially millions in ad revenue from the "toxic" News of the World, with companies responsible for more than £8m in annual spend pulling campaigns in the past 24 hours.

A number of media buying agency executives said they had been inundated with calls from rival publishers querying what the advertisers they represent might be looking to do with their budget.

"It is like ambulance chasing, calls are coming from rivals [newspapers], smaller publishers, radio and outdoor - you name it," said one senior industry source. "The NoW brand is now so toxic that by association clients definitely want out this weekend at least."


News Corporation Deputy Chief Operating Officer and News International Chairman James Murdoch's statement to staff announcing the closure of the 168-year-old Sunday paper:

"I have important things to say about the News of the World and the steps we are taking to address the very serious problems that have occurred.

It is only right that you as colleagues at News International are first to hear what I have to say and that you hear it directly from me. So thank you very much for coming here and listening.

You do not need to be told that The News of the World is 168 years old. That it is read by more people than any other English language newspaper. That it has enjoyed support from Britain's largest advertisers. And that it has a proud history of fighting crime, exposing wrong-doing and regularly setting the news agenda for the nation.

When I tell people why I am proud to be part of News Corporation, I say that our commitment to journalism and a free press is one of the things that sets us apart. Your work is a credit to this.

The good things the News of the World does, however, have been sullied by behaviour that was wrong. Indeed, if recent allegations are true, it was inhuman and has no place in our Company.

The News of the World is in the business of holding others to account. But it failed when it came to itself.

In 2006, the police focused their investigations on two men. Both went to jail. But the News of the World and News International failed to get to the bottom of repeated wrongdoing that occurred without conscience or legitimate purpose.

Wrongdoers turned a good newsroom bad and this was not fully understood or adequately pursued.

As a result, the News of the World and News International wrongly maintained that these issues were confined to one reporter. We now have voluntarily given evidence to the police that I believe will prove that this was untrue and those who acted wrongly will have to face the consequences.

This was not the only fault.

The paper made statements to Parliament without being in the full possession of the facts.

The Company paid out-of-court settlements approved by me. I now know that I did not have a complete picture when I did so. This was wrong and is a matter of serious regret.

Currently, there are two major and ongoing police investigations. We are cooperating fully and actively with both. You know that it was News International who voluntarily brought evidence that led to opening Operation Weeting and Operation Elveden. This full cooperation will continue until the Police's work is done.

We have also admitted liability in civil cases. Already, we have settled a number of prominent cases and set up a Compensation Scheme, with cases to be adjudicated by former High Court judge Sir Charles Gray. Apologising and making amends is the right thing to do.

Inside the Company, we set up a Management and Standards Committee that is working on these issues and that has hired Olswang to examine past failings and recommend systems and practices that over time should become standards for the industry. We have committed to publishing Olswang's terms of reference and eventual recommendations in a way that is open and transparent.

We have welcomed broad public inquiries into press standards and police practices and will cooperate with them fully.

So, just as I acknowledge we have made mistakes, I hope you and everyone inside and outside the Company will acknowledge that we are doing our utmost to fix them, atone for them, and make sure they never happen again.

Having consulted senior colleagues, I have decided that we must take further decisive action with respect to the paper.

This Sunday will be the last issue of the News of the World.

Colin Myler will edit the final edition of the paper.

In addition, I have decided that all of the News of the World's revenue this weekend will go to good causes.

While we may never be able to make up for distress that has been caused, the right thing to do is for every penny of the circulation revenue we receive this weekend to go to organisations – many of whom are long-term friends and partners – that improve life in Britain and are devoted to treating others with dignity.

We will run no commercial advertisements this weekend. Any advertising space in this last edition will be donated to causes and charities that wish to expose their good works to our millions of readers.

These are strong measures. They are made humbly and out of respect. I am convinced they are the right thing to do.

Many of you, if not the vast majority of you, are either new to the Company or have had no connection to the News of the World during the years when egregious behaviour occurred.

I can understand how unfair these decisions may feel. Particularly, for colleagues who will leave the Company. Of course, we will communicate next steps in detail and begin appropriate consultations.

You may see these changes as a price loyal staff at the News of the World are paying for the transgressions of others. So please hear me when I say that your good work is a credit to journalism. I do not want the legitimacy of what you do to be compromised by acts of others. I want all journalism at News International to be beyond reproach. I insist that this organisation lives up to the standard of behaviour we expect of others. And, finally, I want you all to know that it is critical that the integrity of every journalist who has played fairly is restored.

Thank you for listening."

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+50 # rm 2011-07-07 16:26
Hooooooray!!!! Hey Ruppert, why stop here. Close down Faux News and the Wall Street Urinal. Clean up the place.

This is really ironic. Everything that the News of the World has done is done by all of Murdoch's other yellow press. He have to close down his media empire if he is in the mood to come clean.
 
 
0 # RobinHood 2011-07-10 19:54
Ok, 'they' have found a 'rat' for our consumption. We citizens can all go back to sleep now. Nothing behind the facade; nothing underneath those other shells in the shell game of (early) modernity.

Just keep on 'consumin' & votin' fer the 'coolest' party celebs. they throw up there.

Still 90% stupididity outside?
 
 
+34 # Palli 2011-07-07 19:37
Or is he closing down the newspaper to confuse the lawsuits that will be coming?
 
 
+9 # marind 2011-07-08 11:51
That's my bet.

Murdoch doesn't take a shit without figuring out what's in it for him.

Ethics? In a pig's eye.
 
 
+3 # AML 2011-07-08 18:11
Quoting
Or is he closing down the newspaper to confuse the lawsuits that will be coming?

Remember when Murdoch was asked whether a news program should have a political agenda? He answered, "Certainly not". The man has nothing but contempt for humanity.
 
 
+23 # Palli 2011-07-07 19:39
Or is he just preparing for the upcoming lawsuits?
 
 
+27 # Writ 2011-07-07 20:30
Finally, someone addressing Rupert Murdoch's racist and dirty empire of printed rags, including the NY Post, and his haven for the lowest political hacks, scandal mongers and sociopaths, Fox 5 and his European scandal sheet, which includes The News of the World. Everything Murdock touches is tainted since he himself supports spreading hate, bigotry, misinformation and propaganda. Bring his entire enterprise down, no matter what side of the ocean. No one will miss him or his brand of filthy journalism.
 
 
+30 # DaveM 2011-07-07 20:56
Looks like Goliath just took a solid hit. Any more Davids around to bring this demented giant tumbling down?

Note that all it took was for enough people to hold NoW personnel responsible for their actions and to get advertisers to pull out of the publication. It does not have to--and should not--end here.
 
 
+4 # LeeBlack 2011-07-08 11:09
We also need an effective FCC so these organizations don't become so big and such a big (controlling) part of the media.
 
 
+20 # wwway 2011-07-07 21:22
So hackers destroyed the phone messages of a murdered girl and replaced them with new ones. That means everything we say, text, or tweet is saved and looked at by God knows who? What are the implications for how far anyone or group will go to manipulate any circumstance? Are any communications safe?
 
 
+4 # Virginia 2011-07-07 22:37
Nope
 
 
+6 # Ralph Averill 2011-07-08 01:57
In a word, no.
 
 
+15 # DPM 2011-07-07 21:33
I doubt that he is doing it out of the goodness of his heart. It all has to do with money, just as was the case with Glenn Beck. And, once again, the people most hurt, besides the people News of the World hacked and their families, the "little guys", at the paper, that are now out of work. Still...at least the "rag" is done.
 
 
+7 # Ralph Averill 2011-07-08 02:03
The soon-to-be-former employees of NoW can take the opportunity to do something useful for a living. The optimist in me hopes that employees of the NY Post and Fox News will soon have the same opportunity.
 
 
+16 # Virginia 2011-07-07 22:00
Too frickin' bad. Don't stop there investigate the entire family... Where's Wikileaks when ya need them?
 
 
+8 # Ralph Averill 2011-07-08 02:27
Be patient. There could be those at FOX and the NY Post with an ax to grind coming out of the woodwork soon.
 
 
+8 # Progressive Patriot 2011-07-07 22:38
Let's create a scandal a Fox News. Maybe he'll shut that lying network down, too.

At least he got rid of Glenn Beck. Now we need to work on O'Really, and Sanitty.
 
 
+8 # m 2011-07-08 00:00
Now if only Murdoch could be forced to dry up and blow away in the intergalactic wind... along with what Ailes us all...
 
 
+9 # trufflehunt 2011-07-08 00:07
Re:.. "..Sky News reported that NI chief executive Rebekah Brooks was in tears as she told staff the title is to close..."

Yes I heard this referred to on BBC Radio 4 news last night. The BBC person was speaking to someone who was present at the News of The World when Rebekah Brooks made the announcement.

Apparently the truth is that she arrived, surrounded by security people, made the announcement, then left. She didn't cry. She was in the building barely more than a couple of minutes.

The crying was done by those receiving the news.
 
 
+4 # Oged Orekyeh 2011-07-08 00:19
I HAV FOLLOWED MURDOCH SINCE A STUDENT IN ENGLAND.WE PRAY HE WILL BE COMPASSIONATE TO SETTLE THOSE STAFF WHOSE CAREERS HAS BEEN WRECKED BY HIS OVERSIGHT AS C.E.O.MAY GOD SUCCOR THE INNOCENT.AMEN.
 
 
+10 # Ralph Averill 2011-07-08 02:25
Let the hungry lawyers seeking punitive damages descend on the Murdoch empire like a plague of locusts! The same for young prosecutors with career ambitions! This is not about a few isolated incidents by a few "rogue" employees. According to all accounts, it has been going on "for years". This is about an ongoing criminal conspiracy to deny people their civil rights for profit. If the people in charge, including and especially Rupert, didn't know, they should have, and are therefore just as culpable as those who actually did the hacking.
"And the walls came a tumblin' down!"
 
 
+4 # rf 2011-07-08 03:12
THis is a win win for Murdoch. He will bust the unions at the paper, reopen with a new name, be the new kid on the block...popular as hell, and have his TV deal go through...it is evil genius!
 
 
+3 # SouthBrun 2011-07-08 03:14
The world is better off without Murdock's Clowney Gazzette. May he be discovered to be just another Wizard of Oz.
 
 
+4 # humanmancalvin 2011-07-08 04:02
One piece of yellow journalism down, plenty more to go. When is Fox-Non_News finally going to cross the decency line (well, anymore than they already have) before enough, or the right people scream FOUL!
Murdochs rags have nothing on old Prada or any news-carriers of North Korea or Red China. Their news is fed to them by the controlling wealthy GOP elites to further their agenda of stealing this country one dime at a time.
 
 
+6 # fredboy 2011-07-08 04:39
Makes one wonder about its US operations.
 
 
+3 # StPete 2011-07-08 04:40
Phooey, they're not "closing" anything.
The Murdochs and staff have planned a make-over of News of the World for a long time. They'll fold much of the paper into another UK rag he owns- and there are several. At NewsCorp they're calling it "repositioning."
 
 
+6 # minmouse 2011-07-08 04:50
This is the reason why Canada said a big NO to Fox news when they wanted to come into their country.
 
 
+5 # flevin 2011-07-08 05:46
All Murdoch & News corp entities should be boycotted out of existence.
 
 
+6 # foxtrottango 2011-07-08 06:40
First, Canada told Murdoch to stay out of Canada and now the UK is saying the same thing. What about the USA, where everything goes, from bigotry, racism, lying, deception, finger pointing and accusation generated mostly from the Republicans and GOP. Those two groups are benefiting from the Murdock Foxnewskkkrap!

Have we become the only indecent nation when it comes to news coverage and where money matters more than morals, family values and truth?

Our politicians, those that have the cojones and who consider moral obligations are much more important to the nation than a pack of news media who relies on the money coming from all the lying, deception, hatred that is generated by Murdoch's newskkkrap employees?

Are too many Americans really that stupid or too intimidated to put up with the Murdoch FOXnewsmedia? Are we a nation of fear mongers and cowards? Our elected officials must be held to a higher standard of representation of the people and stop protecting the rich, the corporations from robbing the taxpaying public and and it's people. They have placed themselves above the law and really couldn't care less once the votes are counted.

There is no need for impeachments, Just send the police to arrest them for betraying the people's trust. That is what the police is for, isn't it? Or are they above the law too?
 
 
+9 # Texas Aggie 2011-07-08 06:48
"we set up a Management and Standards Committee that is working on these issues and that has hired Olswang to examine past failings and recommend systems and practices that over time should become standards for the industry."

He talks about building a system of ethical reporting, but the whole Murdoch empire is built on lies, fabrications, distortions, and advocacy for the extreme right wing. How can they act ethically and continue doing what they made their money by doing?

"as I acknowledge we have made mistakes, I hope you and everyone inside and outside the Company will acknowledge that we are doing our utmost to fix them, atone for them, and make sure they never happen again."

This has become a broken record. How many times have they said this when Fox was found lying about something or showing videos of something other than what they were purported to be? Nothing has changed at Fox, so why should anyone expect anything to change anywhere in the Murdoch empire?
 
 
+2 # Activista 2011-07-08 07:18
Murdoch's propaganda - New York Post
Strauss-Kahn accuser slaps NY Post with libel lawsuit - CNN.com
www.cnn.com/2011/CRIME/07/05/new.york.libel.dsk.../index.html - CachedJul 5, 2011 – The alleged victim in the Dominique Strauss-Kahn sexual assault case has filed a libel lawsuit against the New York Post and five of its ...
And the truth is marching ON
 
 
+3 # kalpal 2011-07-08 07:30
Can anyone else smell the fear emanating from the Murdochs.

This massive loss of income was undertaken in the hope that more investigations will not be started.

I would wager that documents are being shredded at a furious pace in the paper's offices and and the hard drives of their servers are being crushed and thrown away. Evidence must be eliminated and management must be protected.
 
 
+7 # Margaret Morris 2011-07-08 07:39
Of note that the Cameron Administration has close ties with Murdoch and were tardy in condemning the News for their bad deeds. Then the public spoke up and targeted the advertisers with enormous effectiveness. Brits believed Murdoch had too much power and that the politicos were afraid to cross him.

We could do that here i.e.target advertisers while complaining about the Faux in Fox. Something like that has already happened with Beck, remember?
 
 
+1 # reiverpacific 2011-07-08 16:25
One of the differences in the UK is that, OK, there are tabloids and paparazzi out front, including Murdoch's rags which are not by any means the worst. Most of their readership, which is overwhelmingly working-class, buy them for the horse-racing pages and topless-of-the-day on page ?? (they are always "outraged" or "Shocked" by this and that) but there IS STILL a good and in-depth paper press like The Guardian and The Independent, and non-commercial BBC TV, as a balance.
This can hardly be said of the US, whose major media are generally rubbish and the tabloids downright comic-cuts.
The balance here is way over-weighted in favor of the corporate dumbers-down of the many-headed. The GREAT thing here is that there is probably the best "Alternative" press in the world, like RSN, Mother Jones, Democracy Now and many community radio stations spread across the land BECAUSE THEY ARE SO BADLY NEEDED!
Indeed they don't by any means restore the balance but at least they are here for those who care to seek them out and seem to be surviving and even flourishing in some cases, so fed-up are so many people of the shallow-end of news and public affairs so predominant in the most powerful and wantonly ignorant nation on earth.
 
 
0 # MainStreetMentor 2011-07-09 08:59
“News of the World” became truly egregious only AFTER the slime of Murdoch influence touched it. The influx of cancerous Gestapo tactics, fueled by the malignant tyrannical views of a mind twisted by monumental greed and insatiable avarice, mutated a theretofore historically significant media milepost. That same malevolent influence is evident in the broadcasted rhetoric of Fox News and printed within the editorials of the Wall Street Journal. Americans: Your ethical house has been set on fire by the likes of a Rupert Murdoch, and if you don’t work on putting out that fire, there won’t be such a house any more – not for you, nor any of your following generations.
 
 
0 # MainStreetMentor 2011-07-09 09:19
The only way I can understand the lack of aggressive, horrendous outrage and a grass-roots movement by American citizens to censor and curtail the antics and repugnant methods of Rupert Murdoch as they relate to the news industry is: The interests of the general public seem to be centered on what they believe are important, high priority issues such as watching “Dancing With The Stars” and “American Idol”. To allow a commercial entity controlled by the apparent unethical business conduct and procedures of a Rupert Murdoch to continue in business under any name or “front” is an insult to acceptable standards of moral and business ethics and a slur against American citizens sense of right versus wrong. If unethical actions such as displayed in Great Brittan are being conducted by that entity in the USA – it needs to be stopped now.
 
 
+1 # Paul Scott 2011-07-09 13:10
If we had a DOJ in this nation Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld and others would be in jail, for torture, and the old boy from downunder and his son would be spending large sums of money trying to keep themselves out of jail here.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.