Excerpt: "'I don't mind - I'm used to being an underdog,' the president said in an interview with ABC News. 'And I think that at the end of the day, though, what people are going to say is, who's got a vision for the future that can actually help ordinary families recapture that American dream.'"
President Obama speaks in favor of his $447 billion jobs plan while addressing Coloradans in front of Abraham Lincoln High School, 09/27/11. (photo: John Moore/Getty Images)
Obama to GOP: Bring It On
04 October 11
aybe even more than the Republicans, President Barack Obama is looking forward to the GOP picking a candidate to challenge him.
For now and months to come, Obama is an incumbent with no specific rival, a campaigner against various forces but not one in particular.
He is running against a staggering economy. And Congress. And himself - that history-making version of Obama that many voters remember from 2008.
The longer it takes for Republicans to rally around a nominee, the more the election remains a referendum on Obama and jobs. That's not what the White House and his campaign eagerly want: a clear choice between the president and another candidate who holds starkly different views about how to improve the economy.
With polls showing his approval rating in the low 40s, Obama even contended on Monday that he's the underdog.
"I don't mind - I'm used to being an underdog," the president said in an interview with ABC News. "And I think that at the end of the day, though, what people are going to say is, who's got a vision for the future that can actually help ordinary families recapture that American dream."
With no control over when he gets an opponent, Obama is now waging what amounts to a proxy campaign against the eventual Republican nominee.
Every time he presents his jobs bill as a choice between helping the middle class or protecting the ultra-rich, every time he tells Democratic donors that his opponents' approach to governing "will fundamentally cripple America," he is previewing a campaign argument that he will apply against whoever his opponent is.
"What the president is saying now compared to what he's going to be saying in May - I think there's going to be a great symmetry between the two," said David Plouffe, an Obama senior adviser in the White House and the manager of Obama's campaign in 2008.
"We don't sit around here saying, 'We wish we had an opponent.' We know that's going to come," Plouffe said. "When that day comes, we'll be ready for it."
The Republican electoral calendar is fluid and accelerating, with Florida's decision to hold a late-January primary likely to prompt other states to move up their voting, too. Still, newly adopted Republican rules on how delegates are awarded will make it harder for any candidate to quickly clinch the nomination.
Republican insiders say their party's battle could extend into May - meaning Obama would not have a specific challenger for more than seven months.
In the end, Plouffe said he expects Obama will face Texas Gov. Rick Perry or former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney: "It's hard to imagine another scenario," he said.
Obama's campaign wing is already singling out Perry and Romney by name, saying they support policies the American people oppose. In a memo released Monday, the campaign criticized Perry's assertion that Social Security is a "Ponzi scheme" and said Romney supports turning the program over to Wall Street.
But neither party expects most voters to start really paying attention to the race until it is down to Obama and an opponent.
In the meantime, the absence of someone for Obama to post up against presents him with both troubles and openings.
Running against alleged Republican intransigence in Congress isn't exactly the kind of vision that voters can see and feel, or that inspires volunteers.
"Right now, understandably, totally legitimate, this is a referendum on Obama and Biden, and the nature of the state of the economy," Vice President Joe Biden told a South Florida radio station last week. "It's soon going to be a choice."
Obama's strategy is to use the fall and winter to outline a broad vision of how his ideas for the country differ from those of Republicans, and then fill in the details when a competitor emerges.
His themes are already there.
Obama's policy speeches and his high-dollar fundraisers often center on a need for the wealthy to pay a bigger share to shrink the federal deficit and pay for education, research and the basic infrastructure of the country. He has been talking about opportunity for all and calling anew for a "big, generous vision of what America has been and can be."
"In this phase, the president can soften the ground, no matter who the candidate is," said Doug Hattaway, a Democratic strategist. "I see it as an opportunity. He has an opportunity to draw a very clear line between his vision and the Republican ideology, and let the Republican candidates do a hatchet job on each other."
Karen Finney, a Democratic operative who served in the Clinton White House, said Obama's effort to contrast what he is trying to do with the way congressional Republicans are standing in the way "reminds people what they like about him, which could also help his poll numbers."
Most major polls suggest that Obama faces a challenging environment, at best.
The latest Gallup data show Obama's national approval rating now is below that of all two-term presidents at the same point in their first terms, since Gallup began testing presidential approval regularly during the Eisenhower years. His overall approval rating is at 41 percent in Gallup polling.
Recent polling in swing states such as Ohio and Pennsylvania shows Obama competitive with Romney and Perry, a result that's open to interpretation.
The White House insists that bodes well for Obama, because he already is carrying the weight of his troubles as the familiar incumbent, while his competitors have not gone through the scrutiny of the primary process or a full media vetting of their views. To Republicans, Obama's current standing shows a weak incumbent who has blended governing and campaigning into one message.
"I don't think people believe that he's running on two tracks right now. He's running on one track: Total attacks on Republicans," said Ed Gillespie, a former White House counselor to President George W. Bush and one-time chairman of the Republican National Committee.
For all the debate about whether the election is a referendum on Obama's leadership or a choice between candidates, Obama himself has leaned in public toward the former.
In an interview with a Kansas City, Mo. television station in July, he was asked who in the Republican field could beat him.
He never answered directly, but said if Americans feel he has been moving the country in the right direction, "I'll win. If they don't, I'll lose."
"That's not to say the other candidate is irrelevant," Obama added. "But it does mean I'll probably win or lose based on their assessment of my stewardship."
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |











Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
VOTE STRAIGHT DEMOCRATIC, save SS, Medicare, Medicaid and our rights and get enough to stop the hate the citizens people out of there.
Our once democratic republic is in need of a Progressive Patriot who will stand up to the corporate powers which unethically control our governance, as well as their TP puppets. Obama would only repeat his derelection of obligations to his electorate. We need an FDR personality who will amalgamate the diversity of our nation's people and give the repugnicants one hell of a run for their money ... Wall Street money
I am an FDR Democrat who will vote for any independent Progressive Patriot in opposition to both the repugnicants and any demo-Rat of the Obama persuasion. .
So you see, they're all sea pirates, they're just on different ships in the ocean that is the Land of the Free, the Home of the Brave. Seems we need to sink both ships and build a new boat. That would be if we had some power...or representation. Anyone out there that isn't a sea pirate?
For many years they destroyed the country, and NOW YOU EXPECT that in a couple of years Obama would be able to reverse what the republicans have been working on since before Regan??????? GET REAL
For much too long democrats didn't realize what was happening. REMEMBER when Hillary said: "THAT THERE WAS A WAS a WAST RIGHT WING CONSPIRACY"???? some laughed and thought she was paranoid. The republican didn't they KNEW she was right.
You all SHOULD KNOW BY NOW that NO politician can run without money, which is why we are in this mess.
So for the sake of us all get off your self righteous horses and do and SAY something positive.
Also get involved with : "Get the money out.com" Dylan Rattigan is working on an ammendment. Be positive and FIGHT FOR WHAT YOU AND WE ALL WANT.
And stop playing into the hands of the teabag devils.
I want to see our President Obama DO something big, like tax the rich, pull an executive order to get his jobs bill passed BEFORE he opposes a Republi-religious-bagger!
He's president, for heaven's sake! Do it while you have the power, Mr. Obama! DO something, please. Don't just talk.
N.
But he's got to start kicking ass, taking names, and being presidential.
We've got to get behind a person, man or woman, of principled drive to lead a "Progressive Patriot Party".
Mr. JIVE, aka, President Obama, has been blowing smoke up our behinds about his "progressive" agenda for 3 years.
Where's the progress?
Oh wait, it's election time -- which means it's time to once again remember the "little people" who rallied to put his butt in the White House.
We're done. We're gone.
We've seen that there really wasn't any of the promised "light."
Mr. Obama can continue to kiss Wall Street's royal ass, but all of us who once believed his promises know better.
The prom is over.
We know he just wanted to get under our dress to continue the rape and pillage of the middle class and America's natural resources.
Bye-bye, Mr. Obama...go teach "Constitutional" law after you kill American citizens from Predator drones with no trial, no accusation, no witnesses.
We're gone.
There are really some deaf, dumb and blind people on site today...
A primary conquest over Obama would be preferable to his certain defeat in the general elections. Obama's "compromising" has broken the hearts of too many of us who worked our butts off for him in the '08 campaign; too heart-broken to risk another assault via Obama's Wall Street connections. If we are to be economically assaulted again, it would be totally unbearable to experience that at the hands of a known
betrayer to the middle class.
If he is to win this coming election -- whoever (whatever) the GOP opponent is -- he's got work to do. He's got to turn and face the American people who elected him and look us in the eye and say, "I AM one of you -- and for you. I am forsaking the Richest, turning down Big Oil in its determination to run this government and those in Latin America and the Middle East as well; I am closing the noxious hopeless Bush prisons, and indicting torturers and treasonists (including Bush and Cheney!); I will remember Palestinians are human, and quit bowing to Israel at every move; I will halt polluters and environmental murderers in their tracks; I will enforce decent tax laws and make the "Lions" pay the lion's share -- as of course they SHOULD; I will quit raining bombs on countries with whom we are NOT at war, and I will Bring Home Our Troops -- and our money -- from places where they had no business in the first place, and put them to work on rebuilding THIS country."
In short, he might move seriously to do those things he promised us, first time around. Then the whole world would be brighter -- for him and the rest of us.
If he hasn't figured out by now that he is going to get nothing but obfuscation, smoke and mirrors, no ideas and "NO!" after "NO!" from the other side he doesn't deserve the support of the rest of the country.
What he really needs to do to give some hope and trust to what should be his "base", is to go to Wall Street and get in behind these folks and their peers all over the country, go to public schools, struggling small businesses, people who have no health care and to small clinics with sliding scales as where I live, and VA facilities which are trying to cope with the returning war-crippled, both physically and mentally.
In other words GO TO THE STREETS and listen to people who have been hurt, even destroyed by the greedy pigs at the national trough.
And while he's at it, scrap the "Super-rich Committee" which has no credibility at the grassroots, and replace it with a truly meaningful working collective.
This is still a rich country; we just need somebody to wield the mallet that hits the sweet spot to release these pent-up funds in the national Piñata FOR ALL.
"Bring it on" was uttered in another way by Bush the twit and is a good sign but political only so far and needs to have a social context beyond that!
America has turned into a s**it house and I will be the first of my family line in perhaps 10 generations to leave America. Russia may be bad... but America is worse!
Here I am the piss ant that challenges, speaks out and works for change. In Russia I will be the quiet mouse who works with technology for a better future, respects his neighbors and helps whoever needs help.
This is more than just talk. I now have a formal invitation for a one year, multiple entry business visa to Russia.
Some people are harmed and they just sit there and take it. Some people are harmed and they fight back. I have done enough of the fighting.... I am just ready to leave.
Пака Пака, Питер
Here-here and well said.
I too have begun a plan to move back (but to Scotland, France or Spain) mostly because of the rotten health no-care structure.
how does he figure?
He has the full resources of the US Government and US tax payers to buy his re-election
RSS feed for comments to this post.