Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Intro: "A ThinkProgress examination of Mitt Romney's presidential personal financial disclosures from May 2011 reveal that the former Massachusetts governor and his wife own or owned millions of dollars worth of a Goldman Sachs investment fund invested heavily in mortgage-backed obligations."

GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney holds a discussion on housing and foreclosure in Tampa, Florida, 01/23/12. (photo: Charles Dharapak/AP)
GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney holds a discussion on housing and foreclosure in Tampa, Florida, 01/23/12. (photo: Charles Dharapak/AP)



Romney Profited From Mortgage Foreclosures in Florida

By Josh Israel, ThinkProgress

25 January 12

 

ThinkProgress examination of Mitt Romney's presidential personal financial disclosures from May 2011 reveal that the former Massachusetts governor and his wife own or owned millions of dollars worth of a Goldman Sachs investment fund invested heavily in mortgage-backed obligations. And the current owners of those mortgage debts began foreclosure proceedings against thousands of Floridians.

Along with his investments in Bain Capital funds linked to offshore tax havens, the Romneys have large investments in the Goldman Sachs Strategic Income Fund (institutional class). The firm's March 2011 annual report for the fund notes that about 8 percent of the fund is invested in banks and 24.5 percent is invested in mortgage-backed obligations. Romney's form says he has invested between $1,000,001 and $5,000,000 in the fund and his wife Ann has invested an additional $1 million-plus. Since the 2008 economic meltdown and the enactment of the Troubled Asset Relief Fund, this fund has done quite well, growing 7.88 percent between April 2010 and March 2011.

The mortgage-backed securities in the fund include adjustable rate mortgages from Bear Stearns, Countrywide, IndyMac, and Washington Mutual. A 2009 Center for Public Integrity report identified all four of those companies as among the top-25 subprime lenders in the lead-up to the market's collapse. Countrywide ranked first in that report and Washington Mutual ranked second. While the remnants of those companies have been purchased by major financial institutions, an array of mortgage loan service companies bought up the individual mortgages.

An examination of civil cases filed in Miami-Dade county alone, by just the current owners of the mortgage obligations for now-defunct Washington Mutual and Countrywide, suggests more than 5,000 foreclosure cases were filed in 2010.

And Miami-Dade makes up only about 13 percent of the Florida population, suggesting that these and the other owners mortgage-backed securities included in this fund likely have attempted to foreclose on tens of thousands of Floridians.

A review of Romney's August 2007 financial disclosure for his 2008 campaign reveals no mention of the Goldman Sachs Strategic Income Fund, suggesting the investment was made at some point between the two campaigns.

The funds are identified on the disclosure form as technically being in a "blind trust," but now that he has publicly disclosed these assets, the trust is no longer functionally "blind." The trustee for the trust, R. Bradlford Malt, said this week that he dropped some other Romney investments that conflicted with the Republican Party's values.

In October, Romney suggested that the solution to the foreclosure crisis was "don’t try and stop the foreclosure process. Let it run its course and hit the bottom." While that process is bad for Florida homeowners, these investments show it may have been good for the Romneys.

 

Comments  

 
+9 # MizKatz 2012-01-25 21:51
Why does this come as a surprise to anyone? Scratch the surfaces of Mitt or Newt, find dirty money. You can scratch on both sides of the Aisle and find dirty money. That's politics. We can only hope that the American people aren't blinded by the well-financed GOP lies and distortions, and that maybe this time around the DNC and their candidates will expose and prove these lies and in so doing, wake up more of the 99% who seem, at this point, hell-bent on voting against their own best interests.
 
 
-7 # lnason@umassd.edu 2012-01-25 23:52
How can a lender or investor "profit" from a foreclosure? A foreclosure can only be obtained if the loan/mortgage was not paid back. And if the loan/mortgage was not paid back, the investor has lost his investment money.

In addition, this connection between Romney and the managers making foreclosure decisions seems rather attenuated.

I'm not going to vote for Romney since I do not agree with many of his positions but this piece seems to simply be an inept attempt at a smear or, perhaps, just jealousy and greed getting out of hand.

Lee Nason
New Bedford, Massachusetts
 
 
+2 # gentle 2012-01-26 11:36
It's called a short, the more a stock goes down, the more the profit. You need to understand b 4 rant
 
 
+1 # John Locke 2012-01-27 07:28
lnason@umassd.edu: I am surprised you even ask the question...where were you when the Credit Default Swap Scam was exposed... The banks are made whole by a foreclosure because every loan carries some form of Default insurance. Think AIG and the $180 Billion the US Government put in their accounts so they could continue paying banks like GS and JP and BoA to continue to foreclose...
 
 
+7 # Todd Williams 2012-01-26 05:23
Mitt, you're truely a capitalist pig in every sense of the term. No wonder you want to see the mortgage market bottom out. Piggy, piggy, piggy!
 
 
+4 # panhead49 2012-01-26 08:42
Mr/Ms Nason - wouldn't that be where the insurance monies (bets?) that these mortgages would indeed fail comes in? I'm not well versed in finance although I will admit I've never bounced a check and paid off the mortgage early.
 
 
+2 # Terrapin 2012-01-26 08:58
Mitt Romney ... CORPORATE BOY ... posterchild for Wall Street®
 
 
+1 # ponythecomic 2012-01-26 10:18
I thought I would compare this fund to the S&P 500, especially since it seemed odd to say it has done well since the 2008 meltdown, then select only the period of April 2010 to March 2011 to show how well it has done. And discovered what appear to be some errors in this story. First, this fund came into being June 30, 2010, so I don't know how you could show results dating back to April 2010. Also, the price of shares has gone down fairly steadily since its inception. There have been upward spurts, but it was first offered at $10 per share and closed yesterday at $9.60 per share; the 1-year total return, as of today, is -1.91 percent, and it is way underperforming compared to the benchmark BarCap US Agg Bond TR USD fund. During that same period the S&P has risen about 20 percent. Maybe there were other earnings, but I thought those usually get put back into the fund. I think Mitt is a greedy jerk, but this seems like a bit of a stretch. And I can't find anywhere that says this fund made the kind of returns mentioned in this story. Perhaps the writer can shed some light on this.
 
 
+2 # Buddha 2012-01-26 11:52
What a candidate for the times, the rich dude from the Monopoly game. All he is missing is the top hat.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.