Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

McIntire and Luo report: "Mr. Adelson is hardly a household name. He avoids the limelight and rarely speaks to the press, remaining something of an enigma. He declined to be interviewed for this article, but he and his wife issued a statement saying friendship and loyalty are 'our motivation for helping Newt.'"

File photo: Las Vegas casino magnate and conservative political donor, Sheldon Adelson. (photo: Kim Cheung/AP)
File photo: Las Vegas casino magnate and conservative political donor, Sheldon Adelson. (photo: Kim Cheung/AP)



The Man Behind Gingrich's Money

By Mike McIntire and Michael Luo, The New York Times

29 January 12

 

he trip to Jordan by a group of United States congressmen was supposed to be a chance for them to meet the newly crowned King Abdullah II. But their tour guide had a more complicated agenda.

The guide was Sheldon Adelson, a Las Vegas casino magnate who helped underwrite trips to the Middle East to win support for Israel in Congress. On this occasion in 1999, as the lawmakers enjoyed a reception at the Royal Palace in Amman, Mr. Adelson and an aide retreated to a private room with the king.

There, the king listened politely as Mr. Adelson sat on a sofa and paged through his proposal for a gambling resort on the Jordan-Israel border to be called the Red Sea Kingdom.

"This was shortly after his father, King Hussein, died, and he was grateful to me," Mr. Adelson explained later in court testimony, recalling that he had lent his plane when the ailing monarch sought treatment in the United States. "So they remembered."

The proposal never went anywhere - Mr. Adelson later said he had feared that a Jewish-owned casino on Arab land "would have been blown to smithereens." But his impromptu pitch to the Jordanian king highlights the boldness, if not audacity, that has propelled Mr. Adelson into the ranks of the world's richest men and transformed him into a powerful behind-the-scenes player in American and international politics.

Those qualities may also help explain why Mr. Adelson, 78, has decided to throw his wealth behind what had once seemed to be the unlikely presidential aspirations of Newt Gingrich. Now, in no small measure because of Mr. Adelson's deep pockets, Mr. Gingrich is locked in a struggle with Mitt Romney heading into Florida's Republican primary on Tuesday.

Mr. Adelson, by some estimates worth as much as $22 billion, presides over a global empire of casinos, hotels and convention centers whose centerpiece is the Venetian in Las Vegas, an exuberant monument to excess with canals, singing gondoliers and acres of slot machines. That fortune is a wellspring of financial support for Mr. Gingrich, who has benefited from $17 million in political contributions from Mr. Adelson and his wife, Miriam, in recent years, including $10 million in the last few weeks that went to a "super PAC" supporting him.

The question of what motivates Mr. Adelson's singular generosity toward the former House speaker has emerged front and center in the campaign. People who know him say his affinity for Mr. Gingrich stems from a devotion to Israel as well as loyalty to a friend. A fervent Zionist who opposes any territorial compromise to make way for a Palestinian state, Mr. Adelson has long been enamored of Mr. Gingrich's full-throated defense of Israel.

In December at an event in Israel for a charity he supports, Mr. Adelson made a point of endorsing Mr. Gingrich's assertion that the Palestinians have no historic claim to a homeland.

"Read the history of those who call themselves Palestinians and you will hear why Gingrich said recently that the Palestinians are an invented people," Mr. Adelson said at the event for Birthright Israel, which takes young Jews on trips there.

Mr. Adelson is hardly a household name. He avoids the limelight and rarely speaks to the press, remaining something of an enigma. He declined to be interviewed for this article, but he and his wife issued a statement saying friendship and loyalty are "our motivation for helping Newt."

Through interviews and a review of Mr. Adelson's testimony in legal disputes with former associates, a portrait emerges of a formidable and determined striver who lifted himself out of childhood penury in working-class Boston. He has a sentimental streak - on one of his first trips to Israel, he wore the shoes of his late father, a cabdriver from Lithuania who was never able to visit there - and he has given hundreds of millions of dollars to Jewish causes, medical research and injured veterans.

But his rise has not been without controversy. The Justice Department is investigating accusations by a former casino executive that Mr. Adelson's operations in Macao may have violated federal laws banning corrupt payments to foreign officials. Also, a Chinese businessman accused Mr. Adelson of reneging on an agreement to share profits from the Macao project.

Mr. Adelson also has a reputation for irascibility and has left a trail of angry former business associates. Even his two sons sued him at one point, accusing him of cheating them, though they lost. He filed a libel suit against a Las Vegas newspaper columnist, John L. Smith, who eventually had to declare bankruptcy, and he waged a bitter court battle with a former employee whom he accused of spreading lies about him.

Nevertheless, his concern for his image was apparent in a deposition he gave in a court case, which also hints at the risk for Mr. Gingrich in accepting so much financial help from Mr. Adelson.

Complaining that negative things said about him were winding up in news articles, Mr. Adelson said his charitable donations had "been rejected a couple of times" because of the bad publicity: "Nobody ever says in such an article: ‘Oh, he's a very nice guy. He helps old ladies across the street. He pets dogs behind the ears. He's a hugely charitable person. He gives away hundreds of millions of dollars.' "

Early Ambition

Mr. Adelson likes to recount how his first business breakthrough came when, at age 12, he bought a newsstand in downtown Boston, eventually parlaying his earnings into a brief teenage career operating candy machines.

After high school, he had stints working as a mortgage banker, running a business packaging toiletries for hotels and operating a charter travel company. But he hit the jackpot with a computer trade show, Comdex, which he started in Las Vegas in 1979. Comdex became the signature annual event for the computer industry, attracting more than 200,000 visitors at its peak.

Jason Chudnofsky, who knew Mr. Adelson growing up in Dorchester, Mass., and became chief executive at Comdex, said his friend always had outsize ambition. He recalled Mr. Adelson's telling him decades ago that one day they would be "talking to ministers" and heads of state.

"He was thinking big even back then," Mr. Chudnofsky said.

Big thinking led Mr. Adelson to set his sights on a project that would transform both the Las Vegas casino trade and his own life in ways that seem to have surprised everybody but him.

In 1988, Mr. Adelson and his partners bought the historic Sands Hotel and Casino and built a convention center to accommodate their thriving trade show. Eight years later, after they sold Comdex for $862 million, Mr. Adelson used his profits on a risky new venture: tearing down the aging Sands and spending $1.5 billion to develop a lavish hotel and casino modeled after Venice.

Accepted wisdom had it that building both a hotel-casino and a convention center was a money loser. Mr. Adelson proved otherwise. As his reputation as a successful developer grew, he explored opportunities for overseas expansion. But his attempts to build a casino in Israel met resistance despite his connections, according to court records.

"I went to see the chief rabbi," Mr. Adelson testified in 2009 in a lawsuit he brought against a former employee. "There was no chance the religious bodies were going to allow a casino in Israel."

He turned his attention to Asia. China in 1999 reclaimed the former Portuguese colony of Macao, and a few years later ended a casino monopoly that had existed for many years. Mr. Adelson's company, the Las Vegas Sands Corporation, bid for one of the licenses offered by the Chinese and won, leading to the opening of the $240 million Macao Sands in 2004.

The resort was so successful that its first-year profits exceeded the cost of the project, according to industry analysts. Mr. Adelson, who was also building a casino in Singapore, was riding high. But with so much money on the line, disputes arose with former associates looking for a share of the profits.

He was sued by a Hong Kong businessman, Richard Suen, who said he had been promised a "success fee" for introducing Mr. Adelson and his team to Chinese officials. A jury awarded Mr. Suen $44 million, but the award was overturned on appeal and the case sent back for a retrial, which is still pending.

In his suit, Mr. Suen asserted that while visiting Beijing in 2001, Mr. Adelson had been asked to use his influence in Congress to derail a human rights resolution that Chinese officials feared could complicate their bid to host the Olympic Games. Mr. Adelson acknowledged calling several congressmen, including Tom DeLay, who was the House majority whip at the time, but he and Mr. DeLay denied undermining the bill, which died in committee.

Still, a Sands executive testified that he had relayed a message to the Chinese taking credit for it.

The most damaging accusations have been made by a former Sands executive, Steve Jacobs, who sued after being fired in 2010. He alleges that he was pressed to exert "improper leverage" with Macao government officials to get approvals needed by the company, which Sands officials have denied. His assertions are now the subject of the federal investigation.

Passion for Israel

When Mr. Adelson appeared at the Birthright event in December and spoke approvingly of Mr. Gingrich, he had earned his place on the stage by virtue of his donations to the organization - more than $100 million in all.

He is also the single largest donor to Yad Vashem, Israel's Holocaust memorial and museum, with gifts totaling $50 million. Mr. Adelson's generosity to Jewish causes is especially striking given that for most of his life he was relatively uninvolved in that world.

Mr. Adelson's business partners in his early days at Comdex were all much more active in Jewish affairs. But friends say Mr. Adelson experienced something of an awakening after his first visit to Israel in 1988, when he was in his mid-50s.

"He fell in love with the country," said Ted Cutler, an early business partner.

This coincided with his divorce from his first wife, Sandra. Not long after his trip, he encountered a friend, Sara Aronson, at a Boston restaurant. Mr. Adelson talked excitedly of Israel and mentioned that he was interested in meeting Israeli women, Ms. Aronson recalled.

Ms. Aronson introduced him to her best friend, Dr. Miriam Ochshorn, a divorced physician from Israel in her 40s who was completing a fellowship in addiction medicine at Rockefeller University in New York. As it turned out, Mr. Adelson's two sons from his previous marriage both struggled with drugs. One would die in 2005.

After the couple married in 1991, Mr. Adelson's visits to Israel became so frequent that he told friends he was contemplating settling there. His increasing wealth gave him the means to make a lasting imprint on causes important to him and his wife, including the establishment of drug treatment centers in the United States and Israel.

He also became one of the biggest donors to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the powerful pro-Israel lobby, and joined its executive committee.

Friends point out that his staunch Zionist beliefs are consistent with his take-no-prisoners personality. They also said the views of his wife, who had lived through so much tumult in Israel, including the 1967 war, undoubtedly helped shape his.

Over time, Mr. Adelson made his conservative views felt not only within the committee, but also in Israel. He started a free daily newspaper in 2007, Israel Hayom, that is widely viewed as supportive of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a close friend who shares his hawkish outlook.

Ehud Olmert, who was prime minister from 2006 to 2009, got a taste of the newspaper's treatment of politicians who fall short of Mr. Adelson's expectations. He and Mr. Adelson had been friendly, he said, but grew distant after Mr. Olmert tried to negotiate a two-state solution with Mahmoud Abbas, the president of the Palestinian Authority.

"Once, after I was already prime minister, he asked to come see me with his wife, Miri," Mr. Olmert recalled in a telephone interview. "He already had his newspaper, and every day it attacked me viciously.

"Toward the end of our meeting, I asked him, ‘Aren't you ashamed of what your paper is doing to the prime minister?' " Mr. Olmert said, referring to himself. "He said, ‘I don't read Hebrew.' And Miri said, ‘I do, and I must tell you that we are very aggressive against him.' "

Mr. Olmert added that he had heard from senior American officials that Mr. Adelson had advocated firing Condoleezza Rice as secretary of state and getting rid of Mr. Olmert because both were "betraying Israel."

Shared Conservatism

As Mr. Adelson was experiencing his awakening on Israel, Mr. Gingrich was ascending the Republican ranks. He was also endearing himself to stalwart supporters of Israel.

In early 1995, newly elected as speaker of the House, Mr. Gingrich caused a stir when he called for moving the United States Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. He later backed legislation endorsing the move. It was at a reception celebrating the measure that Mr. Gingrich first met Mr. Adelson, according to an associate of Mr. Adelson.

From then on, Mr. Adelson was among a cadre of pro-Israel advocates with whom Mr. Gingrich had regular interactions. The casino magnate also frequently lent his Gulfstream jet to Mr. Gingrich for cross-country trips, a former Gingrich adviser recalled.

Beyond Israel, the two men shared a conservative philosophy on matters important to Mr. Adelson's businesses, including limiting the ability of labor unions to deduct money from members' paychecks for political activities.

Mr. Gingrich also backed legislation sought by casino owners in 1998 to preserve tax deductions beneficial to the industry. That same year, Mr. Adelson hosted a Republican fund-raiser at one of his Las Vegas venues, headlined by Mr. Gingrich, and donated $300,000 to the party for the midterm elections.

Getting Involved

In 2006, when Mr. Gingrich began laying the groundwork for a possible run for the presidency, Mr. Adelson provided $1 million in seed money for his political committee, American Solutions for Winning the Future. Mr. Adelson donated an additional $2 million the next year; his contributions to the group have totaled more than $7 million.

During the 2008 election cycle, Mr. Adelson became recognized as a top-tier donor to the right and a moneyed villain to the left. He was the primary financier of a conservative nonprofit group, Freedom's Watch, which trumpeted plans to spend as much as $200 million on the presidential election. Those plans, however, fizzled as internal problems paralyzed the organization, with Mr. Adelson micromanaging the group's efforts, Republican operatives familiar with the organization said at the time. The group still spent about $30 million through early 2008, almost all of which came from Mr. Adelson, according to the operatives.

Today, the Venetian and the adjoining Sands Convention Center have become default destinations for Republican events in Las Vegas.

"I call it the Republican headquarters on the Strip," said Jon Ralston, the political columnist for The Las Vegas Sun.

The Venetian will also be the official headquarters hotel for Saturday's Nevada presidential caucuses. And in deference to observant Jews, the Clark County Republican Committee has scheduled a special caucus on Saturday night at the Adelson Educational Campus, a Jewish school financed by the Adelsons, six hours after the rest of the state is done caucusing.

When it came time to picking sides for this year's Republican presidential nomination, Mr. Adelson made clear to friends early on that if Mr. Gingrich decided to run, he would back him. When Mr. Gingrich's campaign faltered, friends who supported other candidates put pressure on Mr. Adelson to stay out of the race.

Nevertheless, Mr. Adelson made an initial $5 million contribution to Winning Our Future, a pro-Gingrich super PAC, before the South Carolina primary, which proved pivotal in Mr. Gingrich's victory there.

Fred Zeidman, a Texas energy executive active in Jewish and Republican circles, said he talked to Mr. Adelson early last week, before it became public that Mrs. Adelson, 66, had also donated $5 million to the super PAC. Mr. Adelson told his friend that he was going to give more money and seemed to signal that he was willing to keep it flowing.

"I think what he's trying to say is, ‘Newt ain't going away, and I'm going to make sure of it,' " Mr. Zeidman said.

Reporting was contributed by Adam Nagourney from Las Vegas, Ethan Bronner and Isabel Kershner from Israel, and Keith Bradsher from Hong Kong.

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
-33 # globalcitizen 2012-01-29 11:13
When Fascist Zionism links up with fascist appeasing liberals, they put on their jackboots and become Fascist, themselves. All class ideologues have morphed through endless class compromises, false centrist arguments towards degeneration of the center into totalitarianism and Fascism.

When Liberals sign off on a police state, like Obama and democrats they cannot call themselves democrats or liberals, but must be called Fascists, class tyrants, who embrace fascist U.S. empire foreign policies, Fascist NATO militarism linked to Fascist Israel and Zionism.

Western Fascism has found a new home within Amerikan Empire and extended it into a global Fascist Matrix. Only the complete dismantling, dissolving of all class hierarchies, world wide will end Wars and Fascism, class tyranny and class history itself.
 
 
+1 # humanmancalvin 2012-01-29 15:27
haha..
 
 
-3 # Todd Williams 2012-01-30 06:52
Bullshit! Just a bunch of buzz words. Meaningless and a waste of my time reading it.
 
 
+83 # maddave 2012-01-29 11:34
Can anyone think of a more urgent reason for reversing Citizen's United and bannig all private funding from all national elections?

( We CAN do both, but only if we elect Progressive President, House -majority and Senate-super-majority in 2012.)
 
 
+9 # Ralph Averill 2012-01-30 01:59
"We CAN do both, but only if we elect Progressive President, House -majority and Senate-super-majority in 2012."
Spot on! Especially Congress!
It's all about Congress in 2012!
 
 
+43 # anarchteacher 2012-01-29 12:23
The top donor to former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney's presidential campaign, investment banking and securities firm Goldman Sachs, received over $10 billion in emergency lending and bailouts from the Federal Reserve after the 2008 financial meltdown, according to public sources and published reports.

Goldman backed Obama for election in 2008, and the firm, like many Wall Street institutions, is now backing Mitt Romney for president.

Romney has long had a close relationship with Goldman Sachs. In 1999 Romney purchased initial IPO shares in Goldman that netted him $1.1 million in profits when he sold them in 2010. And The New York Times recently reported that "many of the assets in Romney's blind trust" are managed by Goldman.

Today, Goldman is Romney's largest donor. And nine of Romney's top 20 campaign contributors are big Wall Street Banks like Goldman. But Goldman leads all Romney contributors, having donated $357,200 to his campaign, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. And six of those nine top contributors received over $161 billion in taxpayer bailouts, reports Romney's ties to Goldman have already become a campaign issue.
 
 
+25 # tomo 2012-01-29 12:36
When I heard Gingrich pontificate that "Palestinians are an invented people," I thought he was off his rocker. What in heaven's name are an "invented people"?
I guess the reason Americans of European descent could trample American Indians all through the nineteenth century is because Sioux, etc, were nowhere annotated in some BLUE BOOK OF REAL PEOPLE; and Gingrich feels that as a GREAT HISTORIAN (he told us so himself), he has a perfect right to discover that Palestinians are not included in such a book either.

But Gingrich is crazy like a fox. Discovering that Palestinians are an invented people has paid off big time.

(I should add, Obama is not one whit better than Gingrich--just more stylish.
On the day he won the nomination from Hillary, Barack pontificated that "An
undivided Jerusalem will always be the capital of Israel." He was trawling for the same votes Gingrich is trawling for. But Obama is much better at despicable behavior than Gingrich is. Obama made himself look like he was GIVING something to Israelis. Gingrich made it transparently clear he was trying to TAKE SOMETHING from Palestinians. (Both of them are actually FALSE friends of Israel--playing to the instincts that keep the Israelis from becoming the great state they could if they would resolutely recognize their need to reach an accommodation with their fellow Semites.)
 
 
+29 # SouthBrun 2012-01-29 13:11
Adelson says; "friendship and loyalty are "our motivation for helping Newt."
Possibly he would like to donate huge sums of money to a serpentarium. Those housed ther have Newt's qualites that he so admires.
 
 
+1 # Doubter 2012-02-01 15:59
"Snakes of a feather slither together."
 
 
+25 # PCCHEMIST 2012-01-29 13:23
I had a worrisome thought about the election. Newt could win. Here is how: Israelis are worried about Iran and also would like to get Obama out and Gingrich in. They will bomb Iran's nuclear facilities. Iran will retaliate by closing the straights causing a world wide recession. Unemployment will rise hurting Obama's election chances. Newt, as the most pro war will capitalize and possibly win. Humanity will suffer.
 
 
+10 # Ray Kondrasuk 2012-01-29 15:42
Front page WSJ Saturday/Sunday, January 28-29, 2012:

"Pentagon Seeks Mightier Bomb Vs. Iran"

Evidently the $330M spent so far for 20 of the 30,000-pound "Massive Ordinance Penetrators" hasn't delivered the punch the Department of Defense is seeking.
 
 
-1 # Todd Williams 2012-01-30 06:57
One thing wrong with that scenario is that the major users of the Straights would NEVER allow the closure. It would disrupt worldwide trade. Besides Iran's navy consists of mainly small gunboats and destroyer-class ships, certainly not capable of taking on our fleet.
 
 
+68 # Mike Farrace 2012-01-29 13:23
I started to compose an Adelman/Gingrich diatribe, but one is so clearly corrupt and the other so corruptible and craven there's really no need. There are a lot of arguable perspectives here. But there is one that is undeniable: when one man has the power to manipulate world events and history and therefore the lives of millions of people he does not know or necessarily understand, simply because he has enough wealth to spare, it is more clear evidence that we need to replace money as the mother's milk of politics. There is no inequity that needs fixing more urgently than that.
 
 
+26 # Misterioso 2012-01-29 14:23
Hi Mike
Well and truly stated!!!
 
 
+16 # ABen 2012-01-29 17:43
Well said Mike! Adam Smith repeatedly warned about the danger of letting economic and political power fall into the same hands. I think he would be very worried about now.
 
 
+40 # lin96 2012-01-29 13:53
People throwing 10 million here and 10 million there. If they're willing to throw money around for friendship and loyalty, why not to save the national debt and the country? I guess we know who will be running the country if any of these people actually get into office. What a sham.



Personally, Gingrich shouldn't have been allowed to run because he was found guilty of a crime. The Congress "censures" their own, but had he been someone like Martha Stewart he'd have gone to jail. The Congress ruling over itself is not part of our Constitution.
 
 
-14 # MidwestTom 2012-01-29 13:56
I do not know how much he donated, but Warren Buffett is a big supporter of Obama; and ir paid off when Obama cancelled the Keystone Pipeline, so Buffett's Burlington Northern Railroad can continue hauling the Tar Sands oil to Houston. i wonder what Newt will do for the $10 ,million.
 
 
+18 # maddave 2012-01-29 17:05
The big mystery, Tom, is "What WOULDN'T Newt Gingrich do for ten mil?"
 
 
+16 # jwb110 2012-01-29 17:46
Quoting
I do not know how much he donated, but Warren Buffett is a big supporter of Obama; and ir paid off when Obama cancelled the Keystone Pipeline, so Buffett's Burlington Northern Railroad can continue hauling the Tar Sands oil to Houston. i wonder what Newt will do for the $10 ,million.


I think the Keystone Pipeline is stopped because of questions by the citizens of Nebraska as to the wisdom of running the pipeline thru the main aquifer for the state. The state of Nebraska made the decision not the Federal Gov't.
 
 
+7 # Todd Williams 2012-01-30 07:00
Yes, that is true. Also, it's worth noting that the first objections to the pipeline were voiced by a group of REPUBLICAN ranchers and farmers in that region.
 
 
+5 # Todd Williams 2012-01-30 07:07
And I forgot to add that it's quite ironic that rethugs in that region wanted to stop a pipeline. However, even they are aware of the possible consequences of a failure of that pipe, Remember the recent pipeline breech on the Yellowstone River? That was quite a big mess. Hate to see another one.
 
 
+28 # X Dane 2012-01-29 13:57
Reading about all the shady dealings of Adelson and his string pulling. I would not put it past him to promote the killing of President Obama.

As you may have read in another article on RSN,a Jewish newspaper..editor?... wanted to get Mosad to kill the president because "he was bad for Israel"
I would call that a TERRORIST threat? Should he no be arrested?

These millionares BUYING their own president...or at least trying to, is destroying the country. Adelson and the Koch monsters we KNOW about. HOW MANY foreign entities,.... people or countries
are also pouring in money, to ensure that they get "THEIR" man in charge??

Thank you Supreme Court. It seems obvious that the five of you want to bring the president down, and the Citizens United, is one furtive way of doing it.

I do NOT understand that more people are NOT alarmed at the destinct possibility that some other country is influencing our elections.

Where are the people worried about our NATIONAL SECURITY??? The apathy is incredible!!
 
 
+15 # maddave 2012-01-29 17:38
X DANE:
With the Addlson-Gingrich trist in full bloom, what we have is one man with a $22 billion bankroll - acting as an agent for a foreign country - who is flagrantly spending huge amounts of cash (from unknown origin) in order to affect the election of the next president of the United United of America. . . . all for the benefit of a foreign country & its government.

The rule is "One man, one vote!" It is NOT not "One man (w/unlimited cash) gets to out-vote the other 310,999,999 of us!"

This whole situation is an outage, a travesty and an insult to all good American voters. In the large context of American government & elections, this egregious power-play is more threatening to WE THE PEOPLE than was Timothy McVeigh's terrorism and arguably, even 9-11.

Think about THAT!
 
 
+6 # X Dane 2012-01-29 20:40
Maddave, I DO all the time, as you can see, and I am appaled that more people are not concerned, angry, taking action, regarding all the SECRET money.

I DO think SOME countries are interfering in our elections, and so are a number of very rich people, who prefer to remain in the shadow. Citizen United is SICK, SICK, SICK. And making our country MUCH LESS SAFE
 
 
+2 # X Dane 2012-01-30 11:17
Maddave, you didn't comment on the editor calling for Mossad to assassinate Obama? I DO think that is an act of TERRORISM. What do you think?
 
 
+10 # KittatinyHawk 2012-01-29 14:06
I still find it hard for people to scream out Holocaust Victim, pass down stories of how they were hated...kill or pay others to kill for them.
Luckily there are good People in that culture. Any people off the deep end are just that.
Goldman, Adelson, Koch prove only one thing they like to buy people, things. Good people cannot be bought, in the long run who do they own?

I believe in my Heritage, I understand the Pride in doing so but I harbor no Hatred. Those who pretend to Love their Heritage, Harbor Hatred are Phonies, nothing more, nothing less. Remember People with money who have to buy people, have no friends. They have no Loyalty to anyone just themselves. Lies is what their lives, businesses, friendships even relationships are built on. This man goes to Israel, gets rid of his wife, mother of his children. Then some wanna be tells him everything he wants to hear, probably for money. That in itself has a name.
Shameless behavior. That he is successful, well at what price, whose cost. For all the pretense, he is reminding Newt as does all buyers, that He is a bought person.
Remember too, they will continue to buy, put their needs before others.
They have proven that already with friends, family and partners.employees. Republicans, you will suck up all this, allow these Puppets to dole out more favors to anyone, everyone but Americans? You are as foolish believing that America will ever again be for America.
 
 
+23 # Misterioso 2012-01-29 14:07
Surely, any informed person understands that since the time of President Truman (with a brief interruption under Dwight Eisenhower), the pro-Israel lobby has played a determining role in shaping U.S. Middle East policy. However, America has now reached the point of "diminishing returns," indeed negative returns, in its unquestioning support of Israel. Such support includes “no strings attached” taxpayer funded aid to the tune of nearly $10 million per day (i.e., money a bankrupt US has to borrow from China et al.) along with $1 billion per year in tax-deductible contributions from American individuals and organizations and interest paid on aid set aside in a special account before it is due (neither perk available to any other recipient of foreign aid).

Day by day, it is becoming more and more evident that exclusionary/expansionary/occupier/oppressor Israel is having an increasingly detrimental effect on the economic and geopolitical interests of the U.S. In his Farewell Address, George Washington admonished his fellow citizens to steer clear of a “passionate attachment” to another nation, as it could create “the illusion of a common interest...where no common interest exists.” America will inevitably act upon the wisdom of its founding father. It will soon have no choice.
 
 
+24 # Archie1954 2012-01-29 14:35
I would suggest that the Adelsons' support for Gingrich is based on much more than friendship. these wealthy casino owners are Israeli firsters. They have more patriotism towards Israel than to the country that helped make them rich. They know that Gingrich like them will accomplish for Israel anything it wants if he were to become president even when such accomplishments would not be in the interests of America. He like they are simply Americans of convenience.
 
 
+7 # Ray Kondrasuk 2012-01-29 14:45
While speaking at a book signing in New York for his 2010 "The punishment of Gaza", author Gideon Levy confided in his audience a quip he said was doing the rounds in the inner circles of Israeli society.

In a wry nod to the incomparable Jewish sense of humor, Levy offered "An anti-Semite is someone who hates Jews... more than they deserve."
 
 
+5 # bobby t. 2012-01-29 15:51
When Israel won partition from the United Nations, they were not supposed to make it. The Jews were supposed to lose to the surrounding Arab countries and to the British who were helping them to destroy the new country. They didn't have a chance. As a child I thought it was a crazy idea to put all those displaced people from the holocaust in one place so that Hitler would finally win. The Arabs lost, Hitler lost but Israel did not win. Over sixty years of war has been the spoils of that first war. Nobody can really call that a win. Golda said we have no place else to go. It is their last stand. Like in Poland, they will fight to the death. It is their homeland, and they have been driven partly crazy over the years. Too many suicide bombers, too many constant arguements. But they are surviving and some say thriving. It is amazing. You can understand a man like Adelson, and his tough wife. Religion has never been rational.
 
 
0 # bobby t. 2012-01-29 15:58
We have been reduced to our basic instinct, which is to adapt or die. Mankind has a thin layer of civilization covering our base atativistic tendencies.
We are still apes that will survive again by living next to the surf on all the continental shelves of the World. It will be the only cool place unless we move underground. And even then, Israel will find a way to make the dessert bloom again. And they will survive.
 
 
+7 # X Dane 2012-01-29 21:29
Bobby, I am afraid, they may not, for sadly they are becoming, what they hated, and fled. Netanyahu has NO intention of working for a two state solution.
Since Palestinians have larger families, they will soon be the majority, and SECOND CLASS citizens. How do you think that will work out?

I am worried that by the way Israel is treating the Paletstinians, and building more and more on Palestinian land, they are turning the world against themselves.

That could end very badly.
I could be, we are the only friend Israel has left. That is bad both for them and us.
 
 
+2 # jcdav 2012-01-30 07:55
And the oppressed becomes the oppressor...only this time we take turns playing "lets you and him fight"...
We the people have this last chance to get the $ out of politics...peaceably in this election...congress and progressives are the key...actually involvement is the key OWS is a start (btw speaking of the oppressed- did you see the video of one NPS cop tasing an ALREADY HELD by two cops Occupy DC protester IN THE BACK?)
Time is short...we must hit the streets in peace while we can..if this goes any farther it will get bloody.
 
 
+3 # X Dane 2012-01-30 11:12
jcdav, I am fervently for getting the money OUT of elections, and politics period. Did you know that this election willl cost.... 6 BILLION DOLLARS....That is obscene! THINK what that money could do to actually WORK FOR the country.

I am very much FOR publicly funded elections, but unfortunately it seems to be way out in the future. Hard to understand that congress would not want to be for it, since it would make their job easier.
They would NOT have to BEG for money about half the time they are in office?? They would be able to actually WORK on issues we sent them there to deal with? Imagine THAT
 
 
+5 # bugbuster 2012-01-29 17:19
Starting Comdex was a brilliant thing to do, no doubt about it. So the guy has talent. It also seems that he runs with the big dogs who sometimes bite and do things like sue him for $44 million. Who knows what that's about? Maybe they are sharks like he is.

Anyway, he shouldn't whine because of what gets written about him. If he gives away money, he should do it quietly and not go around like the Pharisees and evangelists trumpeting his piety and goodness.

And if he wants to get involved in politics with the likes of Newt Gingrich, he will, and I think he should prepare for a lot of people saying a lot of bad things about him. He's not doing anybody any favors. Newt could turn on him like a rattlesnake with no warning.
 
 
+3 # X Dane 2012-01-29 22:05
bugbuster, you jest I am sure!! If Newt
were stupid enough to bite the hand that feeds him...which he won't...Adelson would squash him, like the nasty little bug he is. He doesn't have the money to defend himself either.

No, there will be no turning.
 
 
+8 # DoHickey 2012-01-29 18:05
This article explains why corporations are people & why there will never be peace in the Middle East. Money runs us.
 
 
+2 # X Dane 2012-01-30 10:59
DoHickey, Yes it RUNS and add an i RUINS us!!
 
 
+5 # Valleyboy 2012-01-30 06:05
It's terrifying the mindset that describes Palestinians as "an invented people".
The palestinian people live on one of the areas that were created by the Allies, mainly Britian, from the dissolved Ottoman Empire after WWI. So if you're gonna call the Palestinians invented then you'd better call the Syrians, Lebanese, Israelis, Jordanians & Iraqis that too!
 
 
+1 # lionsdenmother 2012-01-30 10:07
And i am sure Gingrinch's friendship and loyalty to mr adleson will make newt want to do everything in the office of the president he can do to pay mr aldeson back for his friendship and loyalty.. how bout some freaking loyalty to the country you live in.
 
 
+5 # lilpat126 2012-01-30 10:59
Palestine was there in the time of Christ.Israelites are the invented people.
Iran may not be the best country in the middle east but we have no business telling them how to live. And we certainly have no business attacking them to please the Israelis.
As I see it the only way we can start to get our country back is to start with the Congress. Turn off or mute all political ads on TV read and research for yourself who you think would be best. Forget about parties. If you vote just for a party not the candidate don't complain about whop you get. You could have a Gringrich at the local level too. Educate, educate, educate everyone you can about what is going on.
You have a voice and a computer, you can do great things with them. Write to your local paper. Send comments to TV programs. Keep writing in here. We can do it if we try.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.