Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Fisk writes: "Iran announced late last month that its foreign currency reserves would henceforth be held in euros rather than dollars. Bankers remember, of course, what happened to the last Middle East oil producer to sell its oil in euros rather than dollars. A few months after Saddam Hussein trumpeted his decision, the Americans and British invaded Iraq."

'Hostile Takeover of BP' by performance artist Ruppe Koselleck, Sept. 23, 2011. (photo: Ruppe Koselleck)
'Hostile Takeover of BP' by performance artist Ruppe Koselleck, Sept. 23, 2011. (photo: Ruppe Koselleck)



The Demise of the Dollar

By Robert Fisk, Independent UK

26 January 12

 

n the most profound financial change in recent Middle East history, Gulf Arabs are planning - along with China, Russia, Japan and France - to end dollar dealings for oil, moving instead to a basket of currencies including the Japanese yen and Chinese yuan, the euro, gold and a new, unified currency planned for nations in the Gulf Co-operation Council, including Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi, Kuwait and Qatar.

Secret meetings have already been held by finance ministers and central bank governors in Russia, China, Japan and Brazil to work on the scheme, which will mean that oil will no longer be priced in dollars.

The plans, confirmed to The Independent by both Gulf Arab and Chinese banking sources in Hong Kong, may help to explain the sudden rise in gold prices, but it also augurs an extraordinary transition from dollar markets within nine years.

The Americans, who are aware the meetings have taken place - although they have not discovered the details - are sure to fight this international cabal which will include hitherto loyal allies Japan and the Gulf Arabs. Against the background to these currency meetings, Sun Bigan, China's former special envoy to the Middle East, has warned there is a risk of deepening divisions between China and the US over influence and oil in the Middle East. "Bilateral quarrels and clashes are unavoidable," he told the Asia and Africa Review. "We cannot lower vigilance against hostility in the Middle East over energy interests and security."

This sounds like a dangerous prediction of a future economic war between the US and China over Middle East oil - yet again turning the region's conflicts into a battle for great power supremacy. China uses more oil incrementally than the US because its growth is less energy efficient. The transitional currency in the move away from dollars, according to Chinese banking sources, may well be gold. An indication of the huge amounts involved can be gained from the wealth of Abu Dhabi, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Qatar who together hold an estimated $2.1 trillion in dollar reserves.

The decline of American economic power linked to the current global recession was implicitly acknowledged by the World Bank president Robert Zoellick. "One of the legacies of this crisis may be a recognition of changed economic power relations," he said in Istanbul ahead of meetings this week of the IMF and World Bank. But it is China's extraordinary new financial power - along with past anger among oil-producing and oil-consuming nations at America's power to interfere in the international financial system - which has prompted the latest discussions involving the Gulf states.

Brazil has shown interest in collaborating in non-dollar oil payments, along with India. Indeed, China appears to be the most enthusiastic of all the financial powers involved, not least because of its enormous trade with the Middle East.

China imports 60 per cent of its oil, much of it from the Middle East and Russia. The Chinese have oil production concessions in Iraq - blocked by the US until this year - and since 2008 have held an $8bn agreement with Iran to develop refining capacity and gas resources. China has oil deals in Sudan (where it has substituted for US interests) and has been negotiating for oil concessions with Libya, where all such contracts are joint ventures.

Furthermore, Chinese exports to the region now account for no fewer than 10 per cent of the imports of every country in the Middle East, including a huge range of products from cars to weapon systems, food, clothes, even dolls. In a clear sign of China's growing financial muscle, the president of the European Central Bank, Jean-Claude Trichet, yesterday pleaded with Beijing to let the yuan appreciate against a sliding dollar and, by extension, loosen China's reliance on US monetary policy, to help rebalance the world economy and ease upward pressure on the euro.

Ever since the Bretton Woods agreements - the accords after the Second World War which bequeathed the architecture for the modern international financial system - America's trading partners have been left to cope with the impact of Washington's control and, in more recent years, the hegemony of the dollar as the dominant global reserve currency.

The Chinese believe, for example, that the Americans persuaded Britain to stay out of the euro in order to prevent an earlier move away from the dollar. But Chinese banking sources say their discussions have gone too far to be blocked now. "The Russians will eventually bring in the rouble to the basket of currencies," a prominent Hong Kong broker told The Independent. "The Brits are stuck in the middle and will come into the euro. They have no choice because they won't be able to use the US dollar."

Chinese financial sources believe President Barack Obama is too busy fixing the US economy to concentrate on the extraordinary implications of the transition from the dollar in nine years' time. The current deadline for the currency transition is 2018.

The US discussed the trend briefly at the G20 summit in Pittsburgh; the Chinese Central Bank governor and other officials have been worrying aloud about the dollar for years. Their problem is that much of their national wealth is tied up in dollar assets.

"These plans will change the face of international financial transactions," one Chinese banker said. "America and Britain must be very worried. You will know how worried by the thunder of denials this news will generate."

Iran announced late last month that its foreign currency reserves would henceforth be held in euros rather than dollars. Bankers remember, of course, what happened to the last Middle East oil producer to sell its oil in euros rather than dollars. A few months after Saddam Hussein trumpeted his decision, the Americans and British invaded Iraq.

 

Comments  

 
+53 # artful 2012-01-26 12:20
Thank you George Bush
 
 
+35 # John Locke 2012-01-26 14:20
artful: Thank you also Obama, and corporations like GE and all the others that sent American jobs to China and India...Like JP Morgan and every bank did...if Obama had paid attention to the needs of the middle class and not Wall Street, the economy would have sustained growth, but his interests went in the direction of his handlers, and Now America is truely the third world country they all wanted...here comes lower wages...and inflation...To fix this now, we MUST bring manufacturing back to America, and stop relying on other countries...develop an alternative fuel from hemp or some other form...But Wall street will never allow us to escape the Oil Trap...
 
 
+36 # John Locke 2012-01-26 14:23
Lets be real, we all knew this was coming, or we should have. We did invade Iraq directly after they pulled away from the dollar...Will our military be so belligerent as to believe we can take on the entire world to stop this?...I don't think they are that stupid, But!
 
 
+24 # bugbuster 2012-01-26 12:46
In a way it will be nice not to be the biggest kid on the block any more. The job of the biggest kid on the block is to be hated by everyone else. Now China can take over that honor, and I'm sure they will handle it with all the grace and finesse that the US did.
 
 
+23 # jedson 2012-01-26 12:52
"remember, of course, what happened to the last Middle East oil producer to sell its oil in euros rather than dollars"

Yes, but this time the US might find itself in a military confrontation with both Russia and China -- which could lead to anything, including a full scale nuclear war. That is not in anybody's interest. Even the power hungry leaders in the US can see this. That, I think, is why Obama seems to be backing off from a military confrontation with Iran. Its military power won't pull the US out of this, and its effort to control this situation through economic power will fail. Too many countries are weary of US "hegemony". So this marks the end of the US Empire. That is at least a step in the right direction. Good article.
 
 
+9 # cadan 2012-01-26 22:28
This is indeed a step in the right direction.

We will not be able to fix our economy, or our health care system, or our declining science and technology, or anything else until we shed our empire and our foreign bases.

We probably have to hit rock bottom before we can start back up again. And hopefully this time we will not burden ourselves (or make a bunch of victims) with military adventures.
 
 
+18 # MidwestTom 2012-01-26 12:55
According to the following news item both India and China have announced plans to start buying Iranian oil for Gold. A war with Iran could cost us a lot if those two decide to enter on the side of their major,oil supplier.
http://vestnikkavkaza.net/news/economy/22325.html
 
 
+11 # cordleycoit 2012-01-26 13:17
Again capitalism tries to save it's dead ass with the Euro like ideas. The Amero was supposed to be the suppository of choice before the multinationals crashed the system. If the Arab-o is the solution by the best minds in capitalism time, time for a a mind change. What happens when the oil runs out?
 
 
+11 # Progressive Patriot 2012-01-26 13:25
Is that what it's all about.

So, does that mean that when China decides to stop using the US Dollar as an exchange media that we are going to invade China?
 
 
+13 # colvictoria 2012-01-26 13:33
So the U.S. is in a quandry. Powerful nations have met and have decided the dollar is useless. Will the U.S. continue to drop bombs and assassinate scientists and murder leaders whom they consider an enemy? Will they detain the 99% when the dollar collapses and there is a run on the banks and people won't have access to their money and chaos ensues?
Why did Obama not mention this in his State of the Union address? He said it was getting stronger. I think he lied!
 
 
+11 # Activista 2012-01-26 13:38
"what happened to the last Middle East oil producer to sell its oil in euros rather than dollar"
or Libya/Africa
-- so much for FREE MARKET ....
 
 
+9 # DemocracyNeedsDefenders 2012-01-26 13:44
All those trillions of unwanted dollars coming back to the U.S. would collapse the U.S. economy into hyperinflation. The politicians will go to war to try to head this off. Time to dig a bomb shelter.
 
 
-66 # Robt Eagle 2012-01-26 13:47
GW did well to keep us safe from further attacks on our soil. Obama is screwing the pooch big time here. Thankfully the Navy SEALs and the rest of our Spec Ops warriors will come to the rescue!
 
 
+26 # William Bjornson 2012-01-26 15:48
Um, this is not a computer game or action movie, Bob, it's what is passing for reality lately. GW was the reason we had 9/11. Had Gore been elected, there would have been no reason to carry out such an operation, no "Pearl Harbor" necessary, because we would not have already been planning how to attack Iraq.

One thing some of you might want to consider. When this reserve currency change comes to pass, the sources I see say that it will completely change the American lifestyle. Certainly hostility will be high and almost certainly a universal military draft will be enacted probably up to age 40 or older. The rest of us will just be collateral damage waiting to happen. If we were to expunge our current elite as soon as possible and drastically change the direction of American foreign and domestic policy, we might swing the world back. But, we won't.
 
 
+16 # John Locke 2012-01-26 15:53
Robt Eagle are you really that simple minded...The trade center was an inside job, and Bush didn't keep us safe, he made us less safe...do you believe the US is going to take on the world. If you do you are an idiot? The Dollar has seen its day, now expect it to be devalued while we also see higher prices ...
 
 
+18 # soularddave 2012-01-26 16:30
Robt, please! Have you dismissed any idea that GWB was supposed to keep us safe from ALL attcks on our soil? Now tell us again, who screwed the pooch!

I don't know if you're being facetious, or delusional, but you sure seem to have facts and relationships bacwards.

According to the official History, GWB was in when 911 happened, and Obama was in when OBL was dispatched' by the seal team.

Check it out!
 
 
+12 # Ken Hall 2012-01-26 18:01
RE: So you believe Bushco's line that "Nobody could've seen it coming." I've got a bridge in NYC that I'd be happy to sell you.
 
 
+15 # Klanders 2012-01-26 13:53
Saving the best news for the last! The punchline being...we're in trouble!
 
 
+26 # Buddha 2012-01-26 13:55
Meanwhile we've been TALKING about energy independance and getting off the Oil Economy since 1970, and have done nothing about it. It is so crazy that Reagan removed the solar panels on the White House that Carter installed, because apparently the idea of using alternative energy development to give us energy independance is anathema to the GOP. And you can't get it through the GOP's head that "drill, baby, drill" isn't going to help when we have only about 2% of the worlds oil reserves...
 
 
+19 # panhead49 2012-01-26 14:02
Gee, we sure could shit in a LOT of folks wheaties if we got real serious real quick about alternative energy. Too bad we misplaced that government of, by and for the people a very long time ago.
 
 
-3 # uglysexy 2012-01-26 14:02
no more trade with china
 
 
+8 # economicminor 2012-01-26 17:10
Apple just came in with record earnings making a lot of pension and hedge funds very happy all because they are able to use virtually slave Chinese laborers to build their products.

What are you thinking... where will my new IPad come from? I can't afford US labor costs....
 
 
+12 # X Dane 2012-01-26 18:52
economicminor. people have bocome slaves of their stupid cell-phones. So many are constantly glued to it. What the devil did they do before??

I do have a cell-phone but it is mainly for emergency and short messages. I dont send scads of text messages...I TALK with people. And I certainly don't sit and yack on it, when I am having lunch with friends, or when I am being checked out in the supermarket!!

Not so long ago I was reading, that APPLE has billions and billions and billions of dollars. Obviously they are doing incredibly well, so why in the world do they EXPLOIT CHINESE SLAVE LABOR?? to the point that many of the workers commit suicide?

Why are they not bringing the production back home to America?? I would think they could do with a few million less.
and give work to the people who are buying their prodcts??

Why do Americans not boycot Apple??
I would not have an I-phone if you gave it to me.

STOP BEING SO DAMNED GREEDY, AND BRING JOBS BACK TO AMERICA. Americans need the work. It would also be good, for transportation would cost less and there would be less polution.

Lets occupy APPLE, or at least send them a message...get signatures.
 
 
+5 # economicminor 2012-01-26 20:38
X Dane > People are really easily led. Few think for themselves. It is the go along to get along herd mentality. Few can endure the pressure of being a social pariah. So if Madison Avenue tells them that they have to have an IPad to fit in, then it doesn't matter where they are made or by whom. People can sound so socially moral except few are.

The best psychologists in the world work for big business. They know how to use emotions and social engineering to sell what ever they want.

This is why the American crisis isn't solvable. Feeling IN is more important than patriotism or ethics or anything. Human herd/tribal instincts are strong. That is why mobs are so dangerous. This is why everyone on Wall Street who could was involved in the financial fraud and corruption. Everyone was doing it. That made it alright. I'll bet that most still see nothing wrong in what they did.

You may not be susceptible in falling for the well placed pressure points contrived by the super sales techniques but the majority of Americans aren't so strong minded. Like I said, it is easier to go along to get along than to stand up to the tide flowing past.
 
 
+3 # X Dane 2012-01-26 18:56
Sounds smart uglysexy, but that is not possible, and it would be stupid. We can not be isolationists. That doesn't work.
 
 
0 # noitall 2012-01-26 22:58
Now there's a cliche. If you're an isolationist, does that mean you have to keep your bombs to yourself? China has us over a barrel in a lot of ways. Maybe its not as easy as just not buying from them, who else would buy that shit?
 
 
+5 # RLF 2012-01-27 05:34
We are the biggest market in the world...and everyone wants to sell here. There is absolutely no reason we shouldn't control imports...every other country does. This is what the US gets for being asleep for the last thirty years. We knew this was coming and instead of working on conservation and new energy sources...we talked Christian values and such BS in our government. We will continue to decline until we get a functional government. PS. How much food do you think gets grown with no oil? Hint: not enough!
 
 
+11 # animas 2012-01-26 14:07
The beginning of survival!
 
 
+20 # Chick Dante 2012-01-26 14:17
In reality, the last country to announce a transition away from Oil dollars was Lybia. So, that's two invasions for two two announcements.

America is (and has been) at war to protect the dollar as the world's reserve currency for some time now. And, we may be losing that war.
 
 
+19 # colvictoria 2012-01-26 15:08
Chick Dante Qaddafi was assassinated because he wanted to sell oil in gold not dollars and he wanted to establish an African currency. Nope said the U.S. and we all know what happened to that elderly man who ruled for 42 years.
It's nauseating to hear how our government decides who lives and who dies. Nobody deserves the kind of death Qaddafi experienced. Let's not forget that about 50,000 or more Libyans died as a result of the 7 month NATO bombardment.
Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan and now possibly Iran. We don't see the carnage and we are not shown the blood that spills through the streets. If we did there would be more outrage like during the Vietnam War.
 
 
+3 # lincolnimp 2012-01-27 11:09
We don't see the carnage and we are not shown the blood that spills through the streets. If we did there would be more outrage like during the Vietnam War.
Well put. During the Viet Nam war, footage of combat along with the bodies from both sides was a graphic reminder of the horrors of war. The protests became more and more fueled by what we were seeing on TV. During Dubya's tenure, these images were "verboten" and it seems that this dictate is still in effect. "You don't see it, it ain't there." I'm beginning, finally, to agree that Obama is not the man I voted for.
 
 
+29 # Charles3000 2012-01-26 14:17
Yes, we do have G. Bush to thank for the loss of the Middle East. We can also thank Israel for making a settlement of the Palestinian refugee problem an impossibility.
 
 
+5 # disgusted American 2012-01-26 23:45
And you can thank Bush III a/k/a Barack Obama b/c he's ready to go to war with Iran for the same reason Bush & Co. went into Iraq.

The fact that Iran was going to use euros instead of dollars was known several years ago - just before Bush illegally invaded Iraq. It was written about in an Australian publication and slated to happen a bit sooner than now.

So it's happening a bit later than projected is all.

Anyone who makes a comment only about Bush regarding other countries moving aways from the dollar hasn't been paying attention.

You're all just too quick to blame Bush and refuse to see what Obama has done to the 99 percent along with Democrats AND Republicans on the Hill.
 
 
+13 # shortonfaith 2012-01-26 15:03
A better measure of value would seem to be bushel of wheat or gallon of water? Soon, food & drink may be more valuable than gold. Bankers will again be taking a back seat to farmers & builders. The value of Markets will be in the strength of your consumers, not in the depth of your gold reserves? Soon, those that trade in shiny objects will only have each other to trade with. None of these bean counters actually produce anything anyway? Their objects of value may soon be worthless? In a world of over-population & pollution, what good are bankers? It's time to go back to just being ourselves. I don't believe these last 50 years fighting for more wealth/gold has made us happy, maybe just the opposite? Vast banks of knowledge, cars & computers, oil & war, haven't made us happier? Now that the Fed has just flooded the world with $14 trillion extra dollars to prop things up, this seems like a great time to exchange out it's value? After all, the Fed is not the US.

I'm very close to believing in closing the borders & allowing the world to chase money on its own. As a country we can easily live within our borders. We have great diversity in North America. It is only giant Global Corporations that drag us along trying to convince us that what we want is what they want. Do we really need world domination to have value? I think the glory days of Bankers will soon be over. Allow them to strap as much gold to their bodies as they'd like & set out.
 
 
+6 # economicminor 2012-01-26 17:17
you may be right but not for the reasons you think.. We all may be in real serious trouble and there is little being said about this anywhere.

read this

http://organicjar.com/2008/529/

http://www.infowars.com/monsanto%E2%80%99s-infertility-linked-roundup-found-in-all-urine-samples-tested/




watch this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIN32bYC_sU
 
 
+3 # RLF 2012-01-27 05:41
THis Roundup is just what the world needs...less babies...it may be the savior of us all!
 
 
+4 # Helgaofthemountains 2012-01-26 19:10
[Do we really need world domination to have value?]
Unfortunately, people suck the world over, and if we aren't the dominators, we're the dominated. Sad but true. I'm not condoning our illgotten dominance. Imagine a world where we change that dog-eat-dog attitude to a wiser, more compassionate one!
 
 
0 # twnzach 2012-01-26 15:28
Ok...i gotta do it. Ron Paul told us so. He has been warning us about this sort of thing from happening for decades. He has talked about it over and over and over again. Now can we elect him President? Please?
 
 
+8 # rom120 2012-01-26 15:32
America is run by AIPAC (Jews), Wall street (mostly Jews)and the Pentagon (warmongers)plu s it takes it's orders from Israel. It's not just Obama or Bush it started before them. America is frantically building drones and bunker busters while other concentrate on their economy, forgetting history which teaches us that all waring countries fail sooner or later.
 
 
+28 # rom120 2012-01-26 15:36
What most of you forget, China did not take jobs away from Americans. Big business stopped manufacturing here! China or India is not to blame, put the blame where it belongs.
 
 
+18 # Activista 2012-01-26 16:56
EXACTLY - it was US capitalists MAXIMIZING profit - minimizing manufacturing cost - greed of Steve Job and other hero of US capitalism.
 
 
+8 # punk 2012-01-26 17:20
i dont understand the date on this article. this same story is in Independent UK, and it is dated oct, 2009.
 
 
+3 # Helgaofthemountains 2012-01-26 19:16
Iran chose to shun the dollar as an oil trade in 2005. I read that in Ellen Brown's "Web of Debt". This is old news. The USA is making excuses of WMD's to war with Iran, but the oil/dollar connection is the real reason for war.
Maybe we will develop our vast renewable resources because of all this. I read an MIT report that claimed there is enough geothermal power in Nevada to power the entire country.
 
 
+5 # punk 2012-01-26 17:25
note the date-
The demise of the dollar
BY ROBERT FISK TUESDAY 06 OCTOBER 2009
HTTP://WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK/NEWS/BUSINESS/NEWS/THE-DEMISE-OF-THE-DOLLAR-1798175.HTML
 
 
+3 # jwb110 2012-01-26 17:42
In a John Arlidge, Newsweek,articl e seen on this site this week George Soros referred to GOLD as the ultimate bubble and said he would not get into that market at this time. Just thought you might like to know......
 
 
+2 # ojkelly 2012-01-26 18:03
ah punk, i'd though Bob Fisk had lost it, since the dollar is immensely popular these days, 0 interest rate and still every one is buying it.
Someone has a bit of explaining to do.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/the-demise-of-the-dollar-1798175.html
 
 
-4 # Jazzbo 2012-01-26 18:49
rom120: AIPAC is a powerful lobby, but it does not run America. That's a pretty silly (and anti-Semitic) idea! As Activista notes, the problem here is capitalism. "Antisemitism is the socialism of fools." (Isaac Babel)
 
 
+1 # BellBuoy 2012-01-26 18:57
There you go: paying attention
 
 
+5 # Billy Bob 2012-01-26 19:42
I have an obviously stupid question to ask. I appear to be the only one who doesn't understand. I've asked it before and no one responded. Please educate me and anyone else out there who might be wondering the same thing:

Why does it matter? Is this about changing the exchange rate? If so, why would it do that? What's the process involved that makes the dollar more valuable if people use it to trade oil than it would be if it were one of many currencies used to do that?
 
 
+1 # noitall 2012-01-29 14:46
"Dumb all over; a little ugly on the side" Frank Zappa
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.