Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Intro: "The European Union on Monday prohibited the use of X-ray body scanners in European airports, parting ways with the US Transportation Security Administration, which has deployed hundreds of the scanners as a way to screen millions of airline passengers for explosives hidden under clothing. The European Commission, which enforces common policies of the EU's 27 member countries, adopted the rule 'in order not to risk jeopardizing citizens' health and safety.'"

The European Union now prohibits the use of X-ray body scanners at airports. (photo: Michael Nagle/Getty Images)
The European Union now prohibits the use of X-ray body scanners at airports. (photo: Michael Nagle/Getty Images)



Europe Bans X-Ray Body Scanners Used at US Airports

By Michael Grabell, ProPublica

16 November 11

 

he European Union on Monday prohibited the use of X-ray body scanners in European airports, parting ways with the US Transportation Security Administration, which has deployed hundreds of the scanners as a way to screen millions of airline passengers for explosives hidden under clothing.

The European Commission, which enforces common policies of the EU's 27 member countries, adopted the rule "in order not to risk jeopardizing citizens" health and safety."

As a ProPublica/PBS NewsHour investigation detailed earlier this month, X-ray body scanners use ionizing radiation, a form of energy that has been shown to damage DNA and cause cancer. Although the amount of radiation is extremely low, equivalent to the radiation a person would receive in a few minutes of flying, several research studies have concluded that a small number of cancer cases would result from scanning hundreds of millions of passengers a year.

European countries will be allowed to use an alternative body scanner, on that relies on radio frequency waves, which have not been linked to cancer. The TSA has also deployed hundreds of those machines - known as millimeter-wave scanners - in US airports. But unlike Europe, it has decided to deploy both types of scanners.

The TSA would not comment specifically on the EU"s decision. But in a statement, TSA spokesman Mike McCarthy said, "As one of our many layers of security, TSA deploys the most advanced technology available to provide the best opportunity to detect dangerous items, such as explosives.

"We rigorously test our technology to ensure it meets our high detection and safety standards before it is placed in airports," he continued. "Since January 2010, advanced imaging technology has detected more than 300 dangerous or illegal items on passengers in US airports nationwide."

Body scanners have been controversial in the United States since they were first deployed in prisons in the late 1990s and then in airports for tests after 9/11. Most of the controversy has focused on privacy because the machines can produce graphic images. But the manufacturers have since installed privacy filters.

As the TSA began deploying hundreds of body scanners after the failed underwear bombing on Christmas Day 2009, several scientists began to raise concerns about the health risks of the X-ray scanner, noting that even low levels of radiation would increase the risk of cancer.

As part of our investigation, ProPublica surveyed foreign countries" security policies and found that only a few nations used the X-ray scanner. The United Kingdom uses them but only for secondary screening, such as when a passenger triggers the metal detector or raises suspicion.

Under the new European Commission policy, the U.K. will be allowed to complete a trial of the X-ray scanners but not to deploy them on a permanent basis when the trial ends, said Helen Kearns, spokeswoman for the European transport commissioner, Siim Kallas.

"These new rules ensure that where this technology is used it will be covered by EU-wide standards on detection capability as well as strict safeguards to protect health and fundamental rights," Kallas said.

Five-hundred body scanners, split about evenly between the two technologies, are deployed in US airports. The X-ray scanner, or backscatter, which looks like two large blue boxes, is used at major airports, including Los Angeles International Airport, John F. Kennedy in New York and Chicago's O"Hare. The millimeter-wave scanner, which looks like a round glass booth, is used in San Francisco, Atlanta and Dallas.

Within three years, the TSA plans to deploy 1,800 backscatter and millimeter-wave scanners, covering nearly every domestic airport security lane. The TSA has not yet released details on the exact breakdown.

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+18 # Adoregon 2011-11-16 10:13
"We rigorously test our technology to ensure it meets our high detection and safety standards before it is placed in airports,"

The government and the TSA is saying, "trust us."
Consider what U.S. citizens were told about nuclear testing and ask yourself if any trust extended to the government is warranted:

http://www.darkgovernment.com/humanexp.html

http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Tests/

http://www.rmiembassyus.org/Nuclear%20Issues.htm

Stand up and resist or bend over and be compliant.

Your choice.
 
 
+16 # AndreM5 2011-11-16 10:58
Get this straight. The health concerns for backscatter imaging is badly reported and misleading. The issue is not so much the amount of radiation absorbed as if it were a whole-body dose, like comparing it to cosmic rays while flying (article above). The issue is that the absorbed dose is desposited in the first millimeter or two of the skin. As an organ-specific dose, it can be argued that this is very high, far different from a chest x-ray or cosmic rays any of the other silly comparisons made in the press. The TSA continues its shameful, silly, grotesquely expensive, even harmful Kabuki show in airports near you. And they perform their dance every day.
 
 
+7 # Glen 2011-11-16 14:11
This information, Andre, is important. Most of us are not aware of those deposits. Hell, I had a melanoma removed that was 1.9 millimeters deep. Wonder how many skin issues these machines are causing.
 
 
+8 # Kayjay 2011-11-16 14:25
I opt for the "pat downs" and avoid those scanners. I do feel sorry for those TSA agents who spend their work days adjacent to these radiation spewing machines. Dentists have always had the right idea when they hid out elsewhere when x-raying choppers.
 
 
+1 # Regina 2011-11-17 15:07
And they park lead aprons on the patient's body -- only the tooth gets the dose.
 
 
+8 # papabob 2011-11-16 14:31
As a young girl, my wife received radiation treatment to the sinus area - three times a week. The doctor said it was the "latest" thing for allergic problems. Years later her thyroid glands became cancerous and had to be removed. The diagnosis, which included going over old radiation records, was that the radiation treatments were the cause. The doctor was not held legally responsible.
The solution this problem is a no-brainer.
Get the top guy who approves the use X-rays (or any other type of scanner used) to be legally responsible for any ill effects it causes - for years afterwards. If nothing happens, he did his job and deserves a pat on the back. But if something does happen, haul his ass into court, where he'll be liable for the damage he caused.
It may make him think twice before subjecting the public to the imaging that is, or might be used.
 
 
+1 # Regina 2011-11-17 15:09
And maybe -- just maybe -- admit that the pols don't know beans about medicine, so that maybe they ought to consult the proper variety of medical specialists. Don't wait for medical catastrophes before calling in the legal beagles.
 
 
+10 # futhark 2011-11-16 14:54
Europeans have had their first-hand experience with fascism and it is no wonder that they are more on their guard than Americans against the dangers inherent in centralized authoritarian political systems.

Personally, I'm doing all my traveling by automobile and rail as long as the TSA continues to harass and jeopardize the health of the public.
 
 
-8 # KittatinyHawk 2011-11-16 16:37
There are safer way to do these scans and save people's lives. Europe knows this.

I guess no one from Europe and other places should be allowed in USA that is if the plane even makes it here!

Bit stupid, because soon they will say we will only check every other person, or every 5 because it is too expensive, we cannot afford it. Wait. Population Control comes with ways to do away with us.

I believe scanning with safer techs is possible and far safer for Population.
But then maybe you would prefer actual Terrorists in the Planes with you or others?

How many xrays do you get? How much are you on Cell Phones? How much are you around equipment that run on electricity. Do live near cell towers? Then there is the food imported into the Country esp from Japan. Are you eating irradiated food? Pretty soon if you do not pay attention the companies will not label your food so you will be eating GMO's Want to talk Cancer...keep eating

A Scan once in a while is a small price to pay for world security ...but you eat all day night long!
 
 
+3 # Glen 2011-11-17 09:49
There are thousands of folks who must travel due to their jobs. I myself used to travel a great deal - for pleasure, yes, but was flying a lot.

BUT, that is not the point here, totally. The point is the invasive techniques that have been brought to bear due to the paranoia and then controls put in place over citizens. Citizens have been subjected to these controls far more than terrorists. If there were equal surveillance at every port, on every bus, on every train, on every import and carton - you get the drift - then you might consider the U.S. safe. But there isn't.

Europeans are far more willing to do the research on what good the scanners actually do. The U.S. is into controls and profits for those providing the scanners.
 
 
+5 # Dion Giles 2011-11-16 17:33
This invasive scanning of travellers is not to ensure security, it is to create an atmosphere of incessant paranoia, a war footing. A bit like the pointless air raid drills done for the same purpose when the Communists were the bogeymen of convenience. Same goal, same beneficiaries, same victims.

Good to see the EU doing something useful with its supranational powers for a change.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.