Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

The situation in Japan is as critical as it is dire. Entire towns and villages have been swept away by the sea. The death toll in one area alone could top 10,000. At least two nuclear power plants are in imminent danger of meltdown. -- ma/RSN

A Japanese rescue worker checks for signs of radiation, 03/12/11. (photo: Kim Kyung-Hoon/Reuters)
A Japanese rescue worker checks for signs of radiation, 03/12/11. (photo: Kim Kyung-Hoon/Reuters)



Japan Death Toll Tops 10,000, Multiple Nuclear Meltdowns Loom

By Eric Talmadge and Mari Yamaguchi, Associated Press

13 March 11

 

apan's nuclear crisis intensified Sunday as authorities raced to combat the threat of multiple reactor meltdowns and more than 170,000 people evacuated the quake- and tsunami-savaged northeastern coast where fears spread over possible radioactive contamination.

Nuclear plant operators were frantically trying to keep temperatures down in a series of nuclear reactors - including one where officials feared a partial meltdown could be happening Sunday - to prevent the disaster from growing worse.

Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano also said Sunday that a hydrogen explosion could occur at Unit 3 of the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear complex, the latest reactor to face a possible meltdown. That follows a blast the day before in the power plant's Unit 1, and operators attempted to prevent a meltdown there by injecting sea water into it.

"At the risk of raising further public concern, we cannot rule out the possibility of an explosion," Edano said. "If there is an explosion, however, there would be no significant impact on human health."

More than 170,000 people had been evacuated as a precaution, though Edano said the radioactivity released into the environment so far was so small it didn't pose any health threats.

"First I was worried about the quake," Kenji Koshiba, a construction worker who lives near the plant. "Now I'm worried about radiation." He spoke at an emergency center in Koriyama town near the power plant in Fukushima.

The French Embassy urged its citizens Sunday to leave the area around Tokyo - 170 miles (270 kilometers) from Fukushima Dai-ichi - in case the crisis deepened and a "radioactive plume" headed for the area around the capital. The statement acknowledged that the possibility was looking unlikely.

Edano said none of the Fukushima Dai-ichi reactors was near the point of complete meltdown, and he was confident of escaping the worst scenarios.

A complete meltdown - the collapse of a power plant's ability to keep temperatures under control - could release uranium and dangerous contaminants into the environment and pose major, widespread health risks.

Up to 160 people, including 60 elderly patients and medical staff who had been waiting for evacuation in the nearby town of Futabe, and 100 others evacuating by bus, might have been exposed to radiation, said Ryo Miyake, a spokesman from Japan's nuclear agency. The severity of their exposure, or if it had reached dangerous levels, was not clear. They were being taken to hospitals.

Edano said operators were trying to cool and decrease the pressure in the Unit 3 reactor, just as they had the day before at Unit 1.

"We're taking measures on Unit 3 based on a similar possibility" of a partial meltdown, Edano said.

Japan struggled with the nuclear crisis as it tried to determine the scale of the Friday disasters, when an 8.9-magnitude earthquake, the most powerful in the country's recorded history, was followed by a tsunami that savaged its northeastern coast with breathtaking speed and power.

More than 1,400 people were killed and hundreds more were missing, according to officials, but police in one of the worst-hit areas estimated the toll there alone could eventually top 10,000.

The scale of the multiple disasters appeared to be outpacing the efforts of Japanese authorities to bring the situation under control more than two days after the initial quake.

Rescue teams were struggling to search hundreds of miles (kilometers) of devastated coastline, and hundreds of thousands of hungry survivors huddled in darkened emergency centers cut off from rescuers and aid. At least 1.4 million households had gone without water since the quake, and food and gasoline were quickly running out across the region. Large areas of the countryside were surrounded by water and unreachable. Some 2 million households were without electricity.

Japanese Trade Minister Banri Kaieda warned that the region was likely to face further blackouts, and power would be rationed to ensure supplies to essential facilities.

The government doubled the number of troops pressed into rescue and recovery operations to about 100,000 from 51,000, as powerful aftershocks continued to rock the country. Hundreds have hit since the initial temblor.

Unit 3 at the Fukushima plant is one of three reactors there that had automatically shut down and lost cooling functions necessary to keep fuel rods working properly due to a power outage from the quake. The facility's Unit 1 is also in trouble, but Unit 2 has been less affected.

On Saturday, an explosion destroyed the walls of Unit 1 as operators desperately tried to prevent it from overheating and melting down.

Without power, and with its valves and pumps damaged by the tsunami, authorities resorted to drawing sea water mixed with boron in an attempt to cool the unit's overheated uranium fuel rods. Boron disrupts nuclear chain reactions.

The move likely renders the 40-year-old reactor unusable, said a foreign ministry official briefing reporters. Officials said the sea water will remain inside the unit, possibly for several months.

Robert Alvarez, senior scholar at the Institute for Policy Studies and former senior policy adviser to the U.S. secretary of energy, told reporters that the sea water was a desperate measure.

"It's a Hail Mary pass," he said.

He said that the success of using sea water and boron to cool the reactor will depend on the volume and rate of their distribution. He said the dousing would need to continue nonstop for days.

Another key, he said, was the restoration of electrical power, so that normal cooling systems can operate.

Edano said the cooling operation at Unit 1 was going smoothly after the sea water was pumped in.

Operators released slightly radioactive air from Unit 3 on Sunday, while injecting water into it hoping to reduce pressure and temperature to prevent a possible meltdown, Edano said.

He said radiation levels just outside the plant briefly rose above legal limits, but since had declined significantly. Also, fuel rods were exposed briefly, he said, indicating that coolant water didn't cover the rods for some time. That would have contributed further to raising the temperature in the reactor vessel.

At an evacuation center in Koriyama, about 40 miles (60 kilometers) from the troubled reactors and 125 miles (190 kilometers) north of Tokyo, medical experts had checked about 1,500 people for radiation exposure in an emergency testing center, an official said.

On Sunday, a few dozen people waited to be checked in a collection of blue tents set up in a parking lot outside a local gymnasium. Fire engines surrounded the scene, with their lights flashing.

Many of the gym's windows were shattered by the quake, and glass shards littered the ground.

A steady flow of people - the elderly, schoolchildren and families with babies - arrived at the center, where they were checked by officials wearing helmets, surgical masks and goggles.

Officials placed five reactors, including Units 1 and 3 at Dai-ichi, under states of emergency Friday after operators lost the ability to cool the reactors using usual procedures.

An additional reactor was added to the list early Sunday, for a total of six - three at the Dai-ichi complex and three at another nearby complex. Local evacuations have been ordered at each location. Japan has a total of 55 reactors spread across 17 complexes nationwide.

Officials began venting radioactive steam at Fukushima Dai-ichi's Unit 1 to relieve pressure inside the reactor vessel, which houses the overheated uranium fuel.

Concerns escalated dramatically Saturday when that unit's containment building exploded.

Officials were aware that the steam contained hydrogen and were risking an explosion by venting it, acknowledged Shinji Kinjo, spokesman for the government's Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency, but chose to do so because they needed to keep circulating cool water on the fuel rods to prevent a meltdown.

Officials insisted there was no significant radioactive leak after the explosion.

If a full-scale meltdown were to occur, experts interviewed by The Associated Press said melted fuel would eat through the bottom of the reactor vessel, then through the floor of the containment building. At that point, the uranium and dangerous byproducts would start escaping into the environment.

Eventually, the walls of the reactor vessel - six inches (15 centimeters) of stainless steel - would melt into a lava-like pile, slump into any remaining water on the floor, and potentially cause an explosion that would enhance the spread of radioactive contaminants.

If the reactor core became exposed to the outside, officials would likely began pouring cement and sand over the entire facility, as was done at the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear accident in the Ukraine, Peter Bradford, a former commissioner of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, told reporters.

Another expert, physicist Ken Bergeron, told reporters that as a result of such a meltdown the surrounding land would be off-limits for a long time and "a lot of first responders would die."


Yamaguchi reported from Tokyo. Associated Press writers Tomoko A. Hosaka in Tokyo, Jeff Donn in Boston and Jamey Keaten in Paris contributed to this report.

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+15 # Leslie Helm 2011-03-13 10:19
Japan has been arrogant and irresponsible in insisting that it could take care of any contingency in the case of a nuclear accident. The central government has built many nuclear power plants right on top of faults. The rest of the world should learn from this example. We have been far too quick to embrace nuclear power again.
This article discusses how Japan manipulated villagers in a northeastern town to build nuclear facilities in a clearly dangerous area.
http://articles.latimes.com/1993-03-14/magazine/tm-555_1_nuclear-power-plant
 
 
+2 # Elin 2011-03-13 18:28
Quoting
Japan has been arrogant and irresponsible in insisting that it could take care of any contingency in the case of a nuclear accident. The central government has built many nuclear power plants right on top of faults. The rest of the world should learn from this example. We have been far too quick to embrace nuclear power again.
This article discusses how Japan manipulated villagers in a northeastern town to build nuclear facilities in a clearly dangerous area.
http://articles.latimes.com/1993-03-14/magazine/tm-555_1_nuclear-power-plant


I disagree that they have been arrogant, but the rest of what you've said may be true.
 
 
+6 # granny 2011-03-13 18:44
At least Japan has taken care to build homes and factories in responsible ways, instead of letting corporations to dictate that building should be done in the cheapest ways most profitable to the corporations. Shame on people, goaded by corporations, who would rejoice in Japan's suffering instead of looking at our own infrastructure and asking how it would withstand such disasters.
 
 
0 # Fern Walters 2011-03-14 18:12
Remember it wasn't easy adopting the new technology of fire according to Prometheus. Now we are taking on a newer platform of development. Nuclear obviously shouldn't be built on fault lines, has to have water, will benefit from the new steel alloys being developed now in Russia, and would be a candidate for energy when the North America Water and Power Alliance starts with its 6 million new productive jobs, meg-lev rail, etc. The NAWAPA project will be the science driver for a prosperity we have mostly forgotten when we find the will to cooperate with sovereign nation states in global community.
 
 
+8 # propsguy 2011-03-13 10:39
isn't it pathetic that a country needs to spend it's resources repairing technology run amuck when it's people have just been devastated by an act of nature?

you'd think japan would know better than to have 55 nuclear power plants. after all, they have first hand experience with the damage such a force can unleash
 
 
+12 # Ralph Averill 2011-03-13 12:28
The reason they attacked the US (WW II) in the first place was because we cut them off from their sources of oil. At one point during the oil crisis of the 1970's, Japan was down to three weeks oil supply on hand or on the way in tankers. Japan has absolutely no domestic fossil fuel resources. You can't blame a nation so utterly dependent on imported, undependable energy to roll the dice on nuclear power. My bet is they re-build the damaged plants, put them back on line, and retro-fit all the others to make them safer.
 
 
+1 # Elin 2011-03-13 18:30
Well said Ralph.
 
 
0 # Fern Walters 2011-03-14 18:15
ditto
 
 
-1 # Fern Walters 2011-03-14 18:14
Dare I ask, act of nature?
 
 
+28 # Sheila Cook 2011-03-13 10:56
Knowing how officials tend to lie about environmental disasters (we were told that it was safe to be in the area around the WTC - we now know to have been a lie) I doubt that the area surrounding Japan's damaged nuclear reactors is safe. The nuclear industry would not want it known how dangerous nuclear reactors can become in an earthquake.

We must oppose the construction of more nuclear reactors in this country and not listen to the lies we are told about the safety of nuclear energy.
 
 
-6 # Moon 2011-03-13 12:35
Yes it is unfortunate. I future years we should all sit around fires of twigs and trash to keep warm and cook our food.
 
 
+7 # KittatinyHawk 2011-03-13 15:22
Problem with this is? I have done the wood for 35 years.
Nice thing about the campfires, less chance of having accumulated lots of trash.
No appliances.
 
 
0 # Heather Stone 2011-03-13 16:33
Very nice, seeing that the fuel grows on trees....which are a renewable resource with plenty for everyone. Even New Yorkers can strip Central Park, and when you have to import wood from South America or Tasmania, you will have loads of spare fossil oil to do so.
 
 
+1 # Ralph Averill 2011-03-14 00:34
The other great thing about burning wood is that it puts lots and lots of carbon and soot into the air. Wait! That's not good!
The solution to our energy problems isn't technology, advanced or primitive. It's birth control.
 
 
+1 # Fern Walters 2011-03-14 18:19
Birth control is for the dismal Malthusian economists. Think high energy flux density production to provide for high density populations. Think about living abundantly.
 
 
+1 # Ralph Averill 2011-03-14 00:42
Nuclear industry? What nuclear industry? There hasn't been a new nuclear power plant built in the US in almost 30 yrs. Given recent events in Japan, and the abundance of "clean" coal, (there's an oxymoron!) and natural gas, you won't see a new nuclear plant built for another 30 yrs.
 
 
+17 # billy bob 2011-03-13 11:11
Imagine! A 40 year old reactor!

I wonder what the implications are of the fact that nuclear waste must be stored safely away from the environment for 42,000 years. How old are the pyramids, by the way?

It's a good thing we built these facilites to last! Otherwise, this whole idea of nuclear energy being safe would be unbelievably stupid.
 
 
+13 # cmbaja 2011-03-13 11:56
This is a tragedy any way you look at it. We can all people arrogant, etc., but to what avail? What we as a world need to do is to use less, demand less. By using less we will need less. Nuclear plants can never be guaranteed to be safe. Embracing the use of them is like embracing cancer as a long-awaited friend.
 
 
-17 # El Doktor 2011-03-13 11:56
This response to the reactor possible meltdown will be misunderstood with the forty year old technology.
The modern nuclear reactors have an entirely separate cooling system and steam generation technique.
The public and media must not judge the Japan disaster as to what could happen or might happen in present or future facilities in the United States
 
 
-9 # El Doktor 2011-03-13 12:12
The forty year old facilities in Japan have the older single unit steam/cooling system that is failing .
The newer reactors have a separate steam production and cooling addressing this type of failure.
The public and media should not compare this disaster to the American nuclear technology or be against future nuclear power in the United States as most of our systems, since three-mile island, have the separate dual cooling.
 
 
-6 # ProfT 2011-03-13 12:42
Let's not get anti-nuclear here. This is a tragedy, but nobody can prefer a coal plant.
 
 
+31 # sir edmund the green 2011-03-13 14:20
Nuclear, coal, oil, and most recently hydrofacking for (un)natural gas are all obsolete greed driven technologies.
JAN 2008 Scientific American and a more recent article in Science Daily showed how we could meet all our energy needs with common sense conservation, efficiency, solar, wind and other renewables. The earth receives 100 watts per square meter from the sun, enough solar energy lands on the u.s. in an hour to meet all our energy needs for a year.

The technology is there. We need to get rid of a system that always requires the same filthy palms be greased to solve any problem. Global capitalism is killing us.
 
 
+5 # Cynthia Burke 2011-03-13 14:40
Amen.
 
 
+5 # jchere 2011-03-13 16:41
Sir edmund
You must be living on a different planet than I am. Here on earth, as we call it, our sun delivers 1000 watts per square meter, a much more useable amount.
 
 
+1 # Ida L Tino 2011-03-14 08:46
Sir Edmund the Green, thank you for the only rational comment on the page!
 
 
0 # billy bob 2011-03-17 05:33
Thank you for speaking up against the same old repugnican FALSE DILEMMA.
 
 
+7 # Jayne Milner 2011-03-13 17:12
Massive amounts of diesel are used by machinery in the uranium mining industry. The uranium ore is then crushed ( diesel crushers ) and then milled and refined ( coal generated electricity ). The uranium yellow cake must then be enriched ( massive amounts of coal generated electricity used for this ). By the time they have produced one pellet of uranium fuel they have invested massive amounts of coal and oil power in it. Depending on the ore, which is becoming less and less concentrated as the best deposits are used up, there are often many times the amount of fossil fuel invested in uranium fuel as they get out in "nuclear" power. Nuclear power is really a storage medium like hydrogen - it is not an energy source. So your comment "nobody can prefer a coal plant" - makes no sense.
 
 
0 # billy bob 2011-03-17 05:35
BEAUTJFUL ARGUMENT.
 
 
+4 # KittatinyHawk 2011-03-13 15:18
If this hit Northeastern coast...tsunami would affect every Powerhouse with water coming in from Atlantic Ocean. It would take down TMI which was already had its problems and lives with.
Indian Point in NY which is one of the worst would be hit,
Believe new England has approx 26 Power Plants, some of which are closed due to funds.
Tsunami was not the worry, plates of the Earth shifting is the problem.
Many have said no earthquakes on East Coast...still not in writing, however.
Wind, Solar, Water are the gifts given to us.
No Equipment comes without Maintenance...Corporations do not maintenance their equipment. I know.
 
 
+8 # barbaparee 2011-03-13 16:03
It is about time we quit saying « they should have done this ... », or”we should have learned this ...»,or « how could they do that? … » and simply agree with Sir Edmund’s comment “Global capitalism is killing us!” and get on with finding alternate solutions! Please hurry!!
 
 
+4 # Forenna 2011-03-13 17:03
I don't quite understand who the Japanese government did not look ahead for fault lines and prepare their reactors for other hazards. They seem to be "nuclear prone", as they have a history of being fascinated with this form of electric power supposedly to help their people, but now they have also harmed them. If that meltdown happens, there will be far-reaching consequences, perhaps as far as the Tsunami--which means we could very well receive their "fall out" in the shores of California! Are we prepared for this possibility? Of course not!
 
 
+4 # Jayne Milner 2011-03-13 17:03
Have any arrangements been made where we could send donations to help the people effected by this disaster? I would donate.

I am sure that the radioactive contamination is far worse than they are letting on. Nuclear nations, including the U.S., always cover-up the actual ill effects of these hell machines.

The sooner humanity dumps fossil fuels and nuclear ( which by the way runs on the oil and coal used to mine, mill, refine and enrich uranium ) the better.

The world must radiply deploy solar, wind, geopthermal, tidal, wave, biomass and other clean, safe renewables.
 
 
0 # sakaitena 2011-03-13 22:09
Before opine, please read the LA times article by Leslie Helm. It is well researched and well written piece. If nothing else, it should teach you how plutocracy works.

Tena
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.