Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Intro: "The doctor group questions the medical value of pot and acknowledges some health risk from its use but urges it be regulated like alcohol. A law enforcement official harshly criticizes the new stance."

File photo: premium marijuana buds, 06/15/09. (photo: Big Book Of Buds)
File photo: premium marijuana buds, 06/15/09. (photo: Big Book Of Buds)



California Medical Assn. Calls for Legalization of Marijuana

By Anthony York, Los Angeles Times

16 October 11



he state's largest doctor group is calling for legalization of marijuana, even as it pronounces cannabis to be of questionable medical value.

Trustees of the California Medical Assn., which represents more than 35,000 physicians statewide, adopted the position at their annual meeting in Anaheim late Friday. It is the first major medical association in the nation to urge legalization of the drug, according to a group spokeswoman, who said the larger membership was notified Saturday.

Dr. Donald Lyman, the Sacramento physician who wrote the group's new policy, attributed the shift to growing frustration over California's medical marijuana law, which permits cannabis use with a doctor's recommendation. That, he said, has created an untenable situation for physicians: deciding whether to give patients a substance that is illegal under federal law.

"It's an uncomfortable position for doctors," he said. "It is an open question whether cannabis is useful or not. That question can only be answered once it is legalized and more research is done. Then, and only then, can we know what it is useful for."

The CMA's new stance appears to have as much to do with politics as science. The group has rejected one of the main arguments of medical marijuana advocates, declaring that the substance has few proven health benefits and comparing it to a "folk remedy."

The group acknowledges some health risk associated with marijuana use and proposes that it be regulated along the lines of alcohol and tobacco. But it says the consequences of criminalization outweigh the hazards.

Lyman says current laws have "proven to be a failed public health policy." He cited increased prison costs, the effect on families when marijuana users are imprisoned and racial inequalities in drug-sentencing cases.

The organization's announcement provoked some angry response.

"I wonder what they're smoking," said John Lovell, spokesman for the California Police Chiefs Assn. "Given everything that we know about the physiological impacts of marijuana — how it affects young brains, the number of accidents associated with driving under the influence — it's just an unbelievably irresponsible position."

The CMA's view is also controversial in the medical community.

Dr. Robert DuPont, an M.D. and professor of psychiatry at Georgetown Medical School, said the association's call for legalization showed "a reckless disregard of the public health. I think it's going to lead to more use, and that, to me, is a public health concern. I'm not sure they've thought through what the implications of legalization would be."

Dr. Igor Grant, head of the Center for Medicinal Cannabis at UC San Diego, defended the drug's therapeutic use.

"There's good evidence that it has medicinal value," he said. "Can you say it's 100% bulletproof? No. But the research we've done at the center shows it's helpful with certain types of pain."

The federal government views cannabis as a substance with no medical use, on a par with heroin and LSD. The CMA wants the Obama administration to reclassify it to help promote further research on its medical potential.

But Washington appears to be moving in the other direction. As recently as July, the federal government turned down a request to reclassify marijuana. That decision is being appealed in federal court by legalization advocates.

In recent weeks, the Obama administration has begun cracking down on California's medical marijuana industry, threatening to prosecute landlords who rent buildings to pot dispensaries.

California's marijuana laws have eased over the last 15 years. State voters passed Proposition 215 in 1996, decriminalizing it for medicinal purposes. Federal law still prohibits the sale or possession of the drug for any reason.

The CMA opposed Proposition 215, and it argues that doctors have been placed unwillingly in the center of the feud over the drug.

"When the proposition passed, we as an organized medical community got thrown into the middle of this issue, because the posture of the proposition and its proponents found that cannabis is a medicinal product that is useful for a long list of specific ailments," Lyman said.

The state has since softened its laws on even recreational use of the drug. In 2010, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a bill that reclassified possession of less than an ounce from a misdemeanor to an infraction.

At the same time, the number of marijuana dispensaries was skyrocketing, to between 1,000 and 2,000 statewide, according to estimates by law enforcement officials. In January, the Los Angeles City Council set strict limits on pot outlets, ordering the closure of hundreds of them.

Opinion polls show that state voters continue to be in favor of medical marijuana but are divided on the question of total legalization. A recent survey by the Public Policy Institute of California found 51% opposed to complete legalization and 46% in favor.

Last November, California voters rejected Proposition 19, which would have legalized the possession and cultivation of limited amounts of cannabis and permitted local governments to regulate it and tax sales. The CMA took no public position on the measure, its leaders said.

Across the country, physicians have called for more cannabis-related research. The CMA's parent organization, the American Medical Assn., has said the federal government should consider easing research restrictions.

Meanwhile, Lyman said, "there is considerable harm being done."

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+16 # wantrealdemocracy 2011-10-16 09:39
We need to rein in our federal government. Their insane 'war on drugs' is costly and not in agreement with the policies of the States. Our federal government is out of control of the people of this nation. I resent all the funds that I send to the IRS that are used for the endless wars, the bailout of the banking criminals, and the destruction of our civil rights by the Patriot Act and the Homeland Security thugs.

If we can not get control of the federal government we should consider returning to the Articles of Confederation or state by state we secede from the union.
 
 
+22 # Adoregon 2011-10-16 10:13
Yes!!! Yes!!! Kudos to the California Medical Association, whose members are probably somewhat brighter than John Lovell and Dr. Robert DuPont, corporate shill.

Here's a thought: Alcohol, a substance able to kill in one sitting, is legal and ubiquitous, while cannabis, with no lethal dose is prohibited. If either Mr. Lovell or Dr. DuPont think alcohol is LESS dangerous than cannabis, I make this challenge:
Let us meet at a public place. Let this meeting be televised. Every 5 minutes I will consume a bong hit of potent cannabis flowers. Every 5 minutes they will consume an ounce of distilled alcohol (minimum 90 proof). We will continue in this way for 6 hours.
I believe at the end of 6 hours or less, the relative dangers of the two substances will be clear for all to see.

So, Mr. Lovell and Dr. DuPont put your mouths where you money is or STFU.
 
 
+3 # maveet 2011-10-16 15:40
Yes! I'll smoke to that! dogbless these Cali MD's.
 
 
+10 # reiverpacific 2011-10-16 10:17
Gawd, these people who oppose legalizing weed seem to forget how prohibition INCREASED BY MANY TIMES alcohol consumption and turned the major cities into rule by the mobs.
Oregon is getting close and it's now legal in many European countries, including my own homeland of Scotland.
And guess where the biggest demand is for the heavier drugs which make the murderous Mexican Cartels so wealthy and who pretty much rule the country? ¡Pués, mirén al norte compadres!
 
 
+5 # revtravel 2011-10-16 11:25
Actually, as I understand it, the real cash cow for the cartels is marijuana. Imagine if that was eliminated from their income stream.
 
 
+5 # wolf8888 2011-10-16 11:14
Lyman said, "there is considerable harm being done." Thats pure insanity,I'd say that is, We could earn those: Countless millions pocketed by viciuos Mexican Drug Cartels, that are only supplying the current demand, but who, along the way keep syphoning needed resources from the USA. Don't we need the additional tax base? We should control it the way we control Alcohol,we have the network in place with our LCB.The Cartels ..to get exlusive distribuition rights, they managed to kill a few thousand of their own countrymen, quite a few by decapitation. WHY Politicians can not see the writting on the wall?
It boggles my mind
 
 
+3 # NOMINAE 2011-10-17 00:26
wolf8888 What the politicians "see", as they did during Prohibition, is whatever comes into view while looking the other way and accepting kickbacks from the "businessmen" of the drug trade.
 
 
+7 # Lloyd Wagner 2011-10-16 17:03
""I wonder what they're smoking," said John Lovell, spokesman for the California Police Chiefs Assn. "Given everything that we know about the physiological impacts of marijuana — how it affects young brains, the number of accidents associated with driving under the influence — it's just an unbelievably irresponsible position.""

As usual, the cop is lying. None of those things are true about marijuana, though they ARE true about alcohol.
The criminalization of normal and harmless human behavior means big money, though, for the law enforcement and prison industries.
 
 
+6 # NOMINAE 2011-10-17 00:21
Quoting
""I wonder what they're smoking," said John Lovell, spokesman for the California Police Chiefs Assn. "Given everything that we know about the physiological impacts of marijuana — how it affects young brains, the number of accidents associated with driving under the influence — it's just an unbelievably irresponsible position."
Quoting
""I wonder what they're smoking," said John Lovell, spokesman for the California Police Chiefs Assn. "Given everything that we know about the physiological impacts of marijuana — how it affects young brains, the number of accidents associated with driving under the influence — it's just an unbelievably irresponsible position.""

As usual, the cop is lying. None of those things are true about marijuana, though they ARE true about alcohol.
The criminalization of normal and harmless human behavior means big money, though, for the law enforcement and prison industries.


Not only is the cop lying, but how about the cojones on a COP to be "schooling" a State Organization of Practicing Physicians on "the effects on young brains" of *any* substance ? Is it the cop, or the doctors who are most likely to be reading and best able to interpret the lab work out there?
No shortage of unmitigated gall there !
 
 
+4 # Rick Levy 2011-10-16 17:34
I wonder whether police officials who oppose legalization of marijuana are on the take from the drug cartels. Keeping pot illegal = big bucks for illegal growers.
 
 
+4 # Wyntergreen 2011-10-16 19:54
Nobody ever died from smoking weed. The effect of an overdose? You go to sleep.
 
 
+4 # Texan 4 Peace 2011-10-16 22:16
Alcohol and cigarrettes are legal -- does that not represent "a reckless disregard for the public health"?
You don't have to be a smoker to see that prohibition doesn't make sense. The logical disconnect for many people is thinking that making something illegal is the most effective way to control it. Today, pot is more accessible to middle school kids than alcohol is. Meanwhile, a few miles from my city of El Paso, TX, thousands are being killed over drug profits. The quickest way to end the drug war is to legalize it.
 
 
+2 # ABen 2011-10-17 09:31
Legalize marijuana and destroy the cash flow of drug cartels. Now that would be a socially responsible, intellectually enlightened, and economically beneficial political move.
 
 
0 # Califa 2011-10-17 10:28
From what I've read, pretty soon the feds will be coming after grandma and grandpa who are smoking pot for trivial aliments like cancer....

Love the pretty PINK marijuana picture!! How cool it that? Where do I get some? :-)
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.