Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "The federal government has filed a lawsuit to force anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan to provide her financial records to the Internal Revenue Service."

Anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan in front of the White House. (photo: OutofCentralAsiaNow/WordPress.com)
Anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan in front of the White House. (photo: OutofCentralAsiaNow/WordPress.com)



Feds Sue Activist Cindy Sheehan Over Back Taxes

By George Warren, Cornell Barnard, ABC News10/KXTV

22 February 12

 

he federal government has filed a lawsuit to force anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan to provide her financial records to the Internal Revenue Service.

An IRS revenue officer said Sheehan refused to answer any questions about her finances after receiving a summons at her Vacaville home.

The U.S. Attorney's office on Tuesday filed a petition to enforce the IRS summons.

The summons ordered Sheehan to produce bank account statements for the period from August through early November 2011.

According to IRS revenue officer Jose Arteaga, the financial information may be relevant to the collection of Sheehan's federal income tax liabilities for tax years 2005 and 2006.

Arteaga said Sheehan first met with him on Nov. 22 and sought an extension to Jan. 17. It was during the January meeting that she refused to answer any questions or produce the requested documents.

Sheehan said she's always been up front with the IRS and has no intention of paying her taxes. She says the government has already taken enough from her.

"If they (federal government), can give me my son back, I'll pay my taxes, but that's not going to happen," Sheehan said.

Sheehan became an anti-war activist after her son, U.S. Army Specialist Casey Sheehan, was killed in Iraq in 2004. She attracted national attention by setting up a camp in 2005 near President George W. Bush's ranch in Texas.

More recently, Sheehan has been involved in the Occupy movement and was arrested during an October demonstration in Sacramento.

The IRS lists Sheehan as self-employed.

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
-54 # Martintfre 2012-02-22 12:44
DUh, Quick reminder for you liberals

Government is force, it is not reason it is not eloquence. Like Fire it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.

GW
 
 
+135 # aurum79 2012-02-22 14:21
Its the coservatives on Wall St. who won't pay, not as a matter of conscience but through unconscionable greed.
 
 
-23 # Martintfre 2012-02-23 19:57
Quoting
Its the coservatives on Wall St. who won't pay, not as a matter of conscience but through unconscionable greed.


And the Liberals who won't pay? Does Michael Moore, Nancy Pelosi, John Kerry, Harry Reid, Chuck Schummer, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Jimmy Carter ... Do they live at the poverty line and send back all the rest of their money to the government? yea ...suuuure.

It amazes me how easily duped smug liberals are getting scammed by political hucksters they refuse to see in plain sight before them but in every back woods place where must be republicans lurking there traveling preacher's in their revival tents robbing the poor masses.
 
 
+14 # Capn Canard 2012-02-24 08:25
Martinfre, more crocodiles tears again, marty? You are so naive... all people resent paying taxes but it seems that people such as yourself take it personally. And YES Cindy Sheehan seems to take it personally that her son was killed in an illegal war. The difference between that personal loss and yours selfish fixation approaches infinity. Shame on you.
 
 
+31 # mebemo 2012-02-22 15:12
[quote name="Martintfre"]DUh, Quick reminder for you liberals

Government is force, it is not reason it is not eloquence. Like Fire it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.

Fire is dangerous only when used unwisely. Just like money.
 
 
+53 # ericlipps 2012-02-22 15:38
Quoting
DUh, Quick reminder for you liberals

Government is force, it is not reason it is not eloquence. Like Fire it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.

GW

Quidk reminder for you right-wingers: Government that's only "force" isn't government, it's tyranny, and it's doomed to fail.

Certainly the framers of our Constitution meant to establish a government. It's only recent GOP occupants of the White House and Congress who've meant to turn it into a tyranny.
 
 
+16 # disgusted American 2012-02-22 21:17
ericlipps,

it's also democrats who have turned it into tyraany. For starters, Obama signed an excutive order giving Himself the right to assassinate Americans without reason, right to due process, etc.

Then Carl Levin - a D and John McCain - an R (as in bipartisan) wrote the NDAA which Obama was more than happy to sign into law on Dec. 31, 2011 AFTER nearly ALL Democrats voted in favor of it.

Wake up! You have tunnel vision.
 
 
-4 # Martintfre 2012-02-25 07:53
Sorry disgusted - it is all George Bushe's fault and those damned right wingers.
 
 
+17 # GabbyHayes 2012-02-23 05:35
Quoting
DUh, Quick reminder for you liberals

Government is force, it is not reason it is not eloquence. Like Fire it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.

GW

Duh, quick reminder for MartinTFre: The supreme court has ruled that money is speech. withholding taxes is protected by the first amendment.
 
 
+5 # Innocent Victim 2012-02-24 21:14
I think that should be a very cogent defense, if Ms Sheehan needs one. Good point, GabbyHayes!
 
 
-4 # Martintfre 2012-02-25 07:52
//Duh, quick reminder for MartinTFre: The supreme court has ruled that money is speech. withholding taxes is protected by the first amendment.//

I would love to see that case.
 
 
+10 # bluepilgrim 2012-02-23 11:47
This is correct. This goes beyond the right wing arguments for 'small government', but accurately portrays the danger of investing power in any limited group -- and is exactly why it is so important for the people to have the power to hold government accountable, through delegates, not mere representatives who can do what they want subject to checks only every few years, and that assuming the electoral process is working properly.

Government, sometimes even big government, is necessary, but it is always dangerous. Power DOES tend to corrupt. That doesn't mean we do away with government, but that people need to be informed, aware of the dangers, and vigilant, and insist on participatory democracy with enough power directly in the hands of the people to hold the government in check, and to know what the government is actually doing instead of operating secretly.

A car is dangerous, even while useful, and the trick os for the driver to be in control of it. What we have now is government which is out of control, and the people, the 'drivers', have to wrest control back from the rich and those who lust for power.
 
 
0 # Martintfre 2012-02-23 15:26
-45 and falling
So the fact that government is force, the fact that the government took her son and he died in an undeclared war apparently has offended a bunch of people.

So you nay sayers:: are you happy that that same government does not think Cindy has paid a high enough price already?
Do you think that same government should force jail upon her for not supporting their unconstitutiona l actions?
 
 
+155 # bugbuster 2012-02-22 13:11
Her position seems reasonable. A parent who loses a son or daughter in a war has given enough, whether the war is legitimate or not.
 
 
+132 # tomo 2012-02-22 13:22
That Cindy is getting in the government's face is, I think, wonderful. My excuse for not following her example is "I have all kinds of important things I'm doing that would, no doubt, become complicated and compromised were I to go down that road;" but even as I write my excuse, it sounds like a hollow rationalization . She reminds me of Thoreau. Go, Cindy, go!
 
 
+19 # GabbyHayes 2012-02-23 05:38
Veterans and Gold Star families (families who have lost a child or other family member on the battlefield) should not be required to pay taxes. A rule like that would make people hesitate to declare war that requires putting millions of armed troops in the field.
 
 
+2 # Innocent Victim 2012-02-24 21:21
The problem is that "people" no longer declare war, at least not our congresspeople. That would be fine if they did not let the President go to war by providing him with funds. Also, the US no longer puts a troop of "millions" in the field. The latest strategy, by the way, is Gen. Vickers': small, special force units, crossing international borders freely and descending on targets like Al Capone's hit-squads coming around a Chicago corner, machine guns blazing.
 
 
+198 # billybookworm 2012-02-22 13:27
I propose the Sheehan amendment to the IRC. Any parent who loses a child in a pointless, phony war ginned up by an incompetent lying dry drunk president appointed by the republican majority on the supreme court, does not have to pay taxes again, ever.
 
 
+51 # unclewags 2012-02-22 14:34
I would endorse that.

Those who did not speak out and object to BUSH'immoral instrusion on Iraq'soil would be enabled to salve their conscienes, if they have any, by endorsing any proposed legislation which would absolve surviving mothers of killed uniformed military personnel of federal tax obligations.
 
 
+168 # nancyw 2012-02-22 13:39
I think losing a son in an illegal war is enough payment to our government.

You go girl!!
 
 
+139 # tedrey 2012-02-22 13:57
A brave lady whom I have long respected. I wish my mother had lived long enough to know her. Neither of them would any sooner pay tax money for aggressive wars than pay protection money to the Mafia . . . which are actually two fairly equivalent propositions these days.
 
 
+59 # fightback 2012-02-22 15:07
Screw the feds, Good for Cindy for not funding these piece of garbage wars that we are all sick of!! To hell with the feds and their corrupt system.
 
 
+6 # disgusted American 2012-02-22 21:25
One difference between the U.S. gov't and the Mafia:

The Mafia has a code of honor.

btw, Timothy Geithner didn't pay his taxes either, did he? And some others in Obama's cabinet. Did he get harassed by the IRS?

John Kerry tried to get away with not paying taxes on his new yacht about one or two years ago. He docked it in Rhode Island. Nice try, ya crook.

But the MA Dept. of Revenue went after him, so he had to pay up.
 
 
+3 # Observer 47 2012-02-23 06:47
BRAVO!! GREAT post!!
 
 
+88 # svaldez724 2012-02-22 14:14
we need to raise funds for her legal defense. how do we go about this?
 
 
+8 # Carolyn 2012-02-22 15:25
Quoting
we need to raise funds for her legal defense. how do we go about this?

Yes. Thank you for writing that. Cindy needs our support. For that, we need to know some facts. Did her son voluntarily join the armed forces? Can we know that/
 
 
+10 # itchyvet 2012-02-22 22:03
Carolyn,
Ref your question;
Did her son voluntarily join the armed forces? Can we know that ?
As far as I'm aware, he did join voluntarily.
In fact way back when he first became a causalty, I emailed Cindy myself, in those days many of her writtings were SUPPORTIVE of the U.S. foreign policy and the military. I found many of her utterances naive and ill informed.
However, in fairness, these changed dramaticaly over time, when she finaly realised everything she ever believed was a lie.
 
 
+13 # unitedwestand 2012-02-22 22:47
"Did her son voluntarily join the armed forces? Can we know that/"
Even if he volunteered it doesn't mean he should have been sent into a dangerous, unnecessary war for corporatists profits which continue to this day.
Cindy's son was no more than fodder for the Military Industrial Complex machine.

I marvel (and bow some) at Cindy, she never will forgive or forget and I think in turn she represents all the mothers and fathers and loved ones everywhere who lost someone, as the hero of the people. Con's think she is now all happy that there is no Bush to bash, but she is no sycophant of one party or another.
 
 
+15 # lark3650 2012-02-23 05:23
It doesn't matter whether her son voluntarily joined....emotions were on high at the time....we were all suckered in with lies...I'm sure he acted out of love of country..
 
 
+27 # KittatinyHawk 2012-02-22 17:41
Any Good Lawyer would do it pro buono...I said good lawyer.
 
 
+58 # badbenski 2012-02-22 14:15
The Feds will send her old ass to the joint, just to make an example out of her. She needs a crackerjack tax attorney.
 
 
+25 # in deo veritas 2012-02-22 15:06
They used to say that the inmates were running the asylym-now it's the criminals running the prison. And we the victims put them in charge. We are the damned.
 
 
+8 # Observer 47 2012-02-23 06:51
Speak for yourself, in deo. I have universally voted against, marched against, petitioned against, and protested the criminals in charge of this country, no matter which side of the aisle they claim.
 
 
+61 # mrbadexample 2012-02-22 14:24
As pacifists have noted over the years, the government ignores protests, letters to congresscreatur es and voting patterns, but gets pretty energized when people don't pay taxes. If this is a protest action, I hope Ms. Sheehan is ready for a long battle. OTOH, if this HAS been planned out, it could be a game-changer.
 
 
+20 # tedrey 2012-02-22 16:22
The government doesn't usually put you in jail for not paying taxes. They just take your bank accouotnt, your car, your house, or whatever else they can get their hands on. Keeping your income below taxable level is the only sure way. Of course, if you have a job, they get the money before you ever see it.
 
 
-26 # panhead49 2012-02-22 15:06
I like to think that the taxes we pay go to the VA system, both the health care end of it and educational benefit end of it. Or to local schools.

If she doesn't want to give the IRS any money then she should donate whatever it takes to the myriad of tax deductible organizations that help out vets & their families. Or any other type of organizations she may choose. Thumbing her nose at the IRS in protest of war is akin to not paying your electric bill because you don't like how your water company does business.
 
 
+5 # KittatinyHawk 2012-02-22 17:43
They would not accept that as tender paid but great suggestion, Knowing her, she does already give, gave to the Military
 
 
+23 # seefeellove 2012-02-22 18:46
Your argument assumes that the system is accessible and fair to everyone. You also seem to assume the military is a service for the people, many who are economically and educationally disadvantaged. It seems to me that system is rigged by people in power who are desperately addicted to materialism and neglect the basic needs of the majority. I work with vets who distrust their own Government and are not receiving proper care. If Cindy Sheehan were to pay her taxes, she would primarily be feeding a military monster that causes more harm than good.
 
 
-27 # Buddha 2012-02-22 15:38
Actually, while I honor and agree strongly with her anti-war stance, I disagree with her not paying her taxes. Where is the difference between this and a conservative not paying taxes because they disagree with funding Welfare or education or food stamps? I don't agree with our Military Industrial Complex and Global War either...but we end that by fighting to get politicians of like mind elected who can stand up to the MIC and do what is right. If she doesn't like that, she shouldn't live in a representative democracy. She is actually taking AWAY her moral high-ground on her anti-war stance by acting like some anti-tax 1%'er who hates social spending...
 
 
+10 # Observer 47 2012-02-23 07:03
On the face of it, Buddha, you have a reasoned argument. However, I would counter by pointing out that the war Ms. Sheehan is protesting was illegal from the beginning, and has been waged purely for American imperialist motives. In other words, the war is not a legitimate use of taxpayer money. Moreover, that money is being used to kill people. Whereas the money levied for welfare, education, and food stamps HELPS the common good. In addition, it is legally allocated. It's not a question of beliefs being equally valid, but rather, of end results being equally valid. In your scenario, those results are definitely NOT equally valid.
 
 
-2 # Buddha 2012-02-24 21:31
But that could be said for almost any war, they DO tend to be by choice, our entire Global Empire is a choice, and occupying hundreds of nations across the globe makes us a target and enemy, all at the cost of $1T/yr. All your points are certainly valid, and I agree with them...but I still don't see it as a rationalization for not paying one's taxes. Again, many on the loony Right can make the same kind of rationalization s against paying THEIR taxes because of our Social Spending (ie, "it creates dependency on the dole", etc). I'm not saying I agree with that Randian hogwash, but if they can rationalize not paying their taxes in because of personal disagreement with that aspect of our spending, how is Ms Sheehan's stance taking any high ground?
 
 
+3 # reiverpacific 2012-02-23 08:49
Quoting
Actually, while I honor and agree strongly with her anti-war stance, I disagree with her not paying her taxes. Where is the difference between this and a conservative not paying taxes because they disagree with funding Welfare or education or food stamps? I don't agree with our Military Industrial Complex and Global War either...but we end that by fighting to get politicians of like mind elected who can stand up to the MIC and do what is right. If she doesn't like that, she shouldn't live in a representative democracy. She is actually taking AWAY her moral high-ground on her anti-war stance by acting like some anti-tax 1%'er who hates social spending...

We need SELECTIVE tax or a say in where our taxes go and should work for that through Occupy -and there are other tax rebellion movements out there.
If you think that current "Fragmented States" is a representative democracy, suggest you begin y'r re-education with Greg Palast's "The Best Democracy Money Can Buy".
It has been a proto-Fascist plutocracy since the appalling Dulles brothers gave free passage to many Nazi Scientists and Doctors who should have been in the dock at Nuremberg with Gøering and Co. but who had a founding hand in the current bloated MIC and it's long series of blowbacks which in a large part account for the current state of the middle east, Indonesia and formerly the domination of S. & C. Americas (thankfully no longer).
 
 
+38 # Eliza D 2012-02-22 15:39
In pre-Enlightenment Days(ironic phrase) kings and nobles went out on the battlefield and fought their own battles. Sometimes, they lost their lives, and when they did, as Richard III did, their cause was lost. Now we send the poorest, most expendable (to the government) members of society to fight wars these naifs barely understand. Ms. Sheehan has paid a price she never negotiated or agreed to, and I salute her for demanding recompense. Bravo, Ms. Sheehan. You are fighting the good fight and my hopes and prayers are with you.
 
 
+28 # reiverpacific 2012-02-22 15:59
I don't know if she is setting a precedent for an anti-war and military tax revolt but perhaps dimwits Bush, no-heart Cheyney and Romulus Rumsfeld could be asked to chip in a bit for her back taxes (if any) as they killed her son and so many others for a lie. And maybe born-again holy of nouveau-catholic-holies Blair could chip in a few quid as well!
This is going to test her fortitude as it does all those that the true face of Bigger-and-Bigger-Brother will when they gang up on on small individual who is just trying to live and do something positive for the rest of the oppressed in her bereavement. -And she won't be the last.
We need to get behind her en masse!
Occupy the IRS!
 
 
-7 # KittatinyHawk 2012-02-22 17:47
Catholics are not born again. We do it right the first time. Jesus founded Our Church not these phony money scams.

Most of us Catholics who actually love our Faith do not necessarily love Religion so if you have an argument on Faith go to another referendum. This is about Loss, woman who is doing her thing.
 
 
+18 # RJB 2012-02-22 17:17
Big Brother is essentially pathological. He hasn't recruited the best and the brightest much less the wisest. He's recruited the most dogmatic, the most arrogant and the most obsequious. They will incarcerate Cindy if they can and make her a martyr. Remember our prison/industrial complex needs inmates. I

Put Cindy in jail and that will embolden the Occupy movement even further
 
 
+36 # DLT888 2012-02-22 17:20
Bless you Cindy! Hey how come these dirtbag super-rich tax evaders aren't being investigated???!!! No, gotta pick on people like dirt-poor Cindy Sheehan whose son was killed in their rich bloody war. We GOTTA take this country back. The corrupt are in charge. If you're decent, expect to wear handcuffs.
 
 
+32 # L mac 2012-02-22 17:37
Cindy Sheehan you have my utmost respect. It seems when a citizen exersizes thier rights in a way that is contrary to the powers that be you open yourself up for all kinds of legal harrassments.
 
 
+19 # MalleusMaleficarum 2012-02-22 17:50
Bravo for Cindy Sheehan! America needs more heroes and heroines like her! People willing to deny the government taxes because they do not approve of war, torture and targeted assassinations! Tax Revolt!!
 
 
0 # KittatinyHawk 2012-02-22 18:01
Number one Media says, Media knows shit.
Two if self employed, she may not have worked those years. If she owes a couple hundred, they will spend Your money to take her on at cost of thousands to Prove a Point?
Now look at your statements, figure what is wrong with this picture.
First, I do not have facts.
Second, she does not owe us the facts.
Third government probably lying again
Fourth I hope she stands her ground as it will cost them more
Fifth I do hope the properties are not in her name, if anything is in her name than she is dumb to take a stance until such time as it was turned over as most Republicans do.
Remember you are paying for any action that happens, Not her. Her intelligence and her lawyers should have been to put her owe into escrow, then this is different playing field. They might have.You do not know.

You are looking at writers that are writing stories for tabloids, they sensationalize not necessarily tell all the facts. Paper depends on them to do so. Take what writers write very lightly, question authority, then get involved by writing, calling, Get your Local Media involved.
If she needs funding there are Good sites on Web that raise money.But set it up legally with her lawyers knowing or You will be serving time as well.
Get the Facts, she is playin them! Unfortunately at our Expense.
Writer, write me a story on how many Politicians owe Taxes and College Loans for a good story
 
 
+13 # futhark 2012-02-22 18:07
Income taxes on people earning less than $100 000 a years is more for purposes of intimidation than for raising revenue.
 
 
+4 # Regina 2012-02-22 23:13
Income taxes on people earning millions a year are a big fat joke, for purposes of enriching them further. With few exceptions, they contribute megabucks to the election of a congress that will do their bidding and enrich them further, at everyone else's expense.
 
 
-2 # Martintfre 2012-02-23 19:41
Quoting
Income taxes on people earning less than $100 000 a years is more for purposes of intimidation than for raising revenue.


and doing it to people making more then $100,000 is different because ... ?
 
 
+6 # Bev 2012-02-22 20:11
Well the IRS is illegal to begin with. The 16th Amendment was only signed by the state of Alabama. Eager to join in the profits of war by joining WWI, the government lied saying it had indeed passed.
A few people with money to go to court, have challenged the IRS apparently by asking to be shown the law. They can't. And when pressed, say that it is a voluntary contribution.
 
 
+5 # disgusted American 2012-02-22 21:32
Aaron Russo (sp) went after the IRS asking to see the law that says we have to pay taxes. No one would produce it.

See his documentary: America: From Freedom to Fascism.

Some say he died from cancer. Others say the gov't offed him b/c he wouldn't shut up. Speaking of gov't offing people here's a very relevant movie for the times were are in and headed toward:

V for Vendetta

Movie about war lies: Lambs to Lions (or Lions to Lambs - a journalist, a senator and a political science prof.

And one about fed gov't coverup and what was done to whistleblowers: Edge of Darkness.
 
 
+5 # carioca 2012-02-23 01:35
Good for you Cindy. I hope millions of Americans follow suit
 
 
+9 # Auralee 2012-02-23 05:39
From a speech she gave just before she set up camp outside Bush's ranch:

"Another thing that I’m doing is -- my son was killed in 2004, so I’m not paying my taxes for 2004. If I get a letter from the IRS, I’m gonna say, you know what, this war is illegal; this is why this war is illegal. This war is immoral; this is why this war is immoral. You killed my son for this. I don’t owe you anything. And if I live to be a million, I won’t owe you a penny.

"And I want them to come after me, because unlike what you’ve been doing with the war resistance, I want to put this frickin’ war on trial. And I want to say, “You give me my son, and I’ll pay your taxes.”

" . . . . And Henry David Thoreau he went to prison, he refused to pay his poll tax, and Emerson, I call them HT and RW, and RW came to visit HT and said what are you doing here, buddy? And HT said, why aren’t you here? This is the only place for a moral person in an immoral world.

"It’s up to us, the people, to break immoral laws, and resist. As soon as the leaders of a country lie to you, they have no authority over you. These maniacs have no authority over us. And they might be able to put our bodies in prison, but they can’t put our spirits in prison. . . .

* * * * *

"The opposite of good is not evil, it’s apathy."
 
 
+5 # Bill Clements 2012-02-23 09:43
Thank you for sharing this! She's an inspiration to me.
 
 
+5 # chinaski 2012-02-23 05:47
What is the annual depreciation on the government killing of your son for a lie? And what is the maximum deduction for a dead son? What schedule would that be under? How do we amortize the dead?
 
 
+8 # RMDC 2012-02-23 06:18
A tax protest is really the only effective form of protest. If someone refuses to pay taxes because the government spends the money on illegal or immoral programs, the argument should be acceptable in court.

Really the only control people have over their governments is to cut off the funding, to stop paying taxes. Governments know this and do all they can to intimidate people into paying.

Most of the IRS laws use the phrase "system of voluntary compliance" because when income tax was originally debated in congress it was felt that taxes should be paid voluntarily by a citizenry which wants the services government provides. Very few people now would voluntarily pay. Corporations don't voluntarily pay and they have for the most part opted out of paying taxes. The system is falling apart and will collapse soon. The US regime simply cannot collect enough tax to cover its expenses. It fills the deficit by borrowing, but soon it will not be able to borrow. No one will lend to it. So it prints money. That will fail too. The US regime is terminal. It cannot survive for many more years unless there is radical change.
 
 
+6 # Bill Clements 2012-02-23 09:26
Of course, this is complete bullshit. How much do you think this woman owes in back taxes? Do you think someone was paying her a hefty salary for all the hours, weeks, months, and years she has committed herself to being (and living the life of) an activist?

So, this is ALL about sending a message to those like her who are sincere and determined to make change in our society. This is about taking someone with a high profile and very consciously targeting them in order to intimidate and dissuade others from this sort of protest involving the nonpayment of one's taxes.

Of course, Obama is going to lose votes over this. The administration should have let this one go. People are generally sympathetic to a mother who lost her son because a few corrupt and contemptible men in power chose to send U.S. troops (our fathers, mothers, son, and daughters) into a completely illegal, unjustified, and unnecessary war.

If anyone should be targeted for criminal activity, it should be the likes of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, etc., not Cindy Sheehan.
 
 
+4 # futhark 2012-02-23 23:35
Survivors (parents and spouses) of those killed in illegal wars of aggression ought at least to be able to claim an additional exemption on their taxes for their sacrifice.
 
 
+2 # Innocent Victim 2012-02-24 21:29
A tax strike would shut down the government more effectively than the Republicans trying to keep the debt limit fixed. It would end the wars, bring home the troop, block the B-35, and overturn Citizens United faster than Superman. Cindy Sheehan cannot call for it because she would be locked up.
 
 
0 # infohiway 2012-04-01 19:26
A TAX STRIKE WORK?
Maybe 'once upon a time', but not now.
Withholding tax and deficit spending (AKA - DEBT-SLAVERY FOREVER), killed ancient 'tax protests' ... stone dead.
IN ESSENCE: Around 1900 AD unconstitutiona l Federal Income Tax was adopted for federal employees only.
In 1913 Federal (NOT!) Reserve (NONE!) Bank(STERS PONZINOMICS GANG was created from nothing - just like their paper FRNs 'money' - out-of-thin-air.

Then, after engineering W.W.I, the Roaring 20s, The CRASH, The Great Depression' and massive VOLUNTARY income tax 'compliance' during W.W.II - with DONALD DUCK no less.

Then the PRIVATE FED/FRN (FIAT = paper money) gang assumed forced (unratified) 14th Amendment 'equality' applied to ALL employees to pay unconstitutiona l income tax enforced in unconstitutiona l PRIVATE TAX TRIBUNALS - and their 'up to 90% income tax cut' in the fabulous 1950s.

By 1984 income tax failed to 'service (pay the interest on) the U$ DEBT' - thus a tax protest or strike would not change a thing.
HINT #1: The government kept printing DEBT (AKA money) anyway - even though WITHHELD 'income tax' failed and
HINT #2: EMPLOYERS pay income tax on the labor (for using the labor) of the employed 'wage earning' debt slaves.

The only peaceful tool left is THE GENERAL STRIKE.
 
 
+2 # infohiway 2012-02-25 03:02
Ah yes.
The Infernal Revenge Service: a rabid private collection crew for the rancid and private Federal (NOT!) Reserve (NONE!) Bank(STERS PONZINOMICS GANG issuing paper FRNs backed by ... paper and un-repayable debt) harassing bereaved moms, veterans and war protesters; using unconstitutiona l tax tribunal 'courts' on behalf of one seriously embarrassed, bankrupt and exposed gubbermint?

Naah. Couldn't happen in 'Murrika, land of the fee and home of the slave - could it?
 
 
+3 # Windy126 2012-02-25 06:41
I have supported Cindy Sheehan from the start. If they send her to jail, like Martha Stewart she will come out smelling like a rose and stronger than ever. Also with more supporters. The only reason the Gential Obcessed Party is anti- birth control is they will need more cannon fodder for the plqnned future wars.
When GE and other corporations pay taxes then they can go after the average person.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.