Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "Mr. Assange remained in custody pending a hearing on an appeal by the prosecutor, which would take place within the next 48 hours."

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange arrived at court inside a prison van with heavily tinted windows on Tuesday in London, 12/14/10. (photo: Oli Scarff/Getty Images)
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange arrived at court inside a prison van with heavily tinted windows on Tuesday in London, 12/14/10. (photo: Oli Scarff/Getty Images)




Assange Remains in Jail as Sweden Appeals

By Ravi Somaiya and Alan Cowell, The New York Times

14 December 10



Petition in Support of Julian Assange

Also See:
WikiLeaks' Twitter Page: http://twitter.com/wikileaks
WikiLeaks' Support Page: http://wikileaks.ch/support.html
Lieberman Attacks New York Times Over WikiLeaks Documents: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/07/wikileaks-joe-lieberman-new-york-times-investigated



fter a week in detention facing possible extradition, Julian Assange, the founder of the WikiLeaks antisecrecy group, was ordered released on $310,000 bail by a court on Tuesday as he challenges a Swedish prosecutor's demand that he return to Stockholm for questioning about alleged sex offenses.

However, Mr. Assange remained in custody pending a hearing on an appeal by the prosecutor, which would take place within the next 48 hours.

In granting bail, Judge Howard Riddle ordered that Mr. Assange appear again in court on Jan. 11. He also said that between then and now he must reside at Ellingham Hall, a Georgian mansion in Bungay, in eastern England, owned by Vaughan Smith, the founder of a club for journalists. Mr. Assange must spend every night at the mansion and will be electronically tagged so the police can track his movements, the judge said.

Additionally, Mr. Assange will be under curfew every day from 10 p.m. to 2 a.m. and from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. and will be required to report daily to the police from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. His passport is already with the police and, under the terms of his bail, he is not permitted to travel abroad.

Judge Riddle said he granted bail on Tuesday, after denying it a week ago, because Mr. Assange was now able to provide an address where he would be staying. The judge described his earlier decision as "marginal" and said that Mr. Assange had now met that condition of his bail "handsomely."

Mr. Assange was wearing a dark blue suit and a white shirt open at the collar. Reporters said he seemed paler and more fatigued than at the first hearing on Dec. 7 when bail was denied. When the judge announced that bail would be granted on Tuesday, Mr. Assange gave a thumbs-up sign to the packed courthouse.

The case has generated enormous international interest, with figures in the Obama administration weighing whether to prosecute him, critics vilifying him and supporters depicting him as a hero and martyr. Crowds of media crews and reporters built up around the court near Parliament early on Tuesday, mingling with Mr. Assange's followers.

An Australian newspaper, the Sunshine Coast News, reported on Tuesday that his mother, Christine Assange, had flown to London to be with him.

In a 10-minute telephone conversation with his mother, the newspaper said, Mr. Assange declared: "My convictions are unfaltering. I remain true to the ideals I have always expressed. These circumstances shall not shake them. If anything, this process has increased my determination that they are true and correct."

Mrs. Assange was among around 100 people - mainly lawyers and journalists - crammed into Court No. 1 at City of Westminster Magistrates Court for her son's arrival. Mr. Assange arrived in the court building several hours before the afternoon hearing, according to reporters at the court house.

The legal wrangle over Mr. Assange's future erupted after WikiLeaks posted troves of classified American documents on the Internet, the most recent of them drawn from some 250,000 diplomatic cables between the State Department in Washington and American missions abroad.

While Mr. Assange has ascribed the sex offense charges - which he denies - to "dirty tricks" related to his antisecrecy operations, Swedish prosecutors insist there is no link. A week ago, Mr. Assange surrendered to British authorities and was jailed after a judge reviewing the extradition request found him to be a flight risk and denied bail.

Despite his release Tuesday, a final decision on whether he is to be extradited could take weeks or longer.

Speaking about the case in recent weeks, Mr. Assange has said that he had consensual relations with two young Swedish women. He said he met them during a trip to Sweden in August that he made in a bid to establish a haven for himself and WikiLeaks under Sweden's broad laws protecting press freedoms.

The charges relate to the question of whether these encounters ceased to be consensual when a condom was no longer being used. Sweden's request for extradition is designed to enable prosecutors to question Mr. Assange about charges of "rape, sexual molestation and unlawful coercion."

The latest twist in the drama began a week ago when officers from Scotland Yard arrested Mr. Assange after he went to a central London police station by agreement with the authorities.

In a packed courtroom hearing lasting nearly an hour a week ago, Gemma Lindfield, a lawyer acting for the Swedish government, outlined some of the detailed allegations against Mr. Assange made by the Swedish women, both WikiLeaks volunteers. They involved three incidents, including one in which Mr. Assange was alleged to have had unprotected sex with one of his accusers while she was asleep.

In court last week, Mr. Assange refused to give a current address, giving first a post office box, then an address in Parkville in the Australian state of Victoria, where he lived before adopting a peripatetic lifestyle since founding WikiLeaks in 2006.

The exchange appeared to have weighed against his request for bail, which was supported by financial guarantees of more than $150,000 from a cast of well-known supporters present in court, including the filmmaker Ken Loach and Jemima Khan, a socialite and political activist.

The judge, Howard Riddle, agreed with Ms. Lindfield that there were "significant grounds" for thinking Mr. Assange posed a flight risk, because of his "nomadic lifestyle," his lack of ties in Britain, his network of international contacts and his access to substantial sums donated by WikiLeaks supporters.

His week of imprisonment has had little evident impact on the flow of leaked documents from an archive that was made available to five news organizations, including The New York Times. In the telephone conversation with his mother, Mr. Assange said: "I am calling on the world to protect my work and my people from these illegal and immoral acts."

Many of the communications between the State Department and 274 overseas embassies and missions remain to be released.

According to WikiLeaks, only 1,344 of a total 251,287 documents have so far been published on its Web site since it began releasing the latest batch of documents on Nov. 28. Previously the organization had publicized confidential material about the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Ravi Somaiya reported from London, and Alan Cowell from Berlin.

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+7 # B, 2010-12-14 20:00
I'm glad he will be released, but I still say RUN like wind.
 
 
+2 # Paul Nicholson 2010-12-14 22:32
Yes... if he can get free again... RUN! and don't look back...
 
 
-28 # Jim Schaefer 2010-12-14 23:39
Assange and his associates should be prosecuted, as should his supporters who did malicious damage on his behalf. This is not an issue of free speech but of the misuse of top-secret documents.
 
 
+12 # Heartbeatt 2010-12-15 03:24
Punish punish punish? They were obviously not top-secret when at least two million people had clearance to access the documents and they reveal information we have a right to know sbout. The damage done by the US government to US citizens and other countries, which is revealed in some documents, are the real crimes. Or do you think the US has the right to interfere and exert considerable pressure on foreign governments to do US bidding and trample on the rights of their own citizens. That is criminal. The US promises freedom, democracy and transparency and it is evident that they are lying.
And, just wait and see what does happen. Truth has a way of bringing enormous good and why posecute anyone before the effects of their actions can be proven?
It is so tiresome that many cannot move past their superficial thinking on the subject and see that we have moved into a new period of history where we must prevent our governments secretly doing evil in our names and bringing the wrath of those harmed upon us. We are sick of dealing with our governments' contorted policies and the 'deadly damage control' that we have to suffer and pay for afterwards.
 
 
+1 # genierae 2010-12-16 08:04
Heartbeatt: I don't think that most people understand just how bad things are. They are still dreaming democracy while our government is becoming our worst nightmare. Bradley Manning is being kept in solitary confinement for 23 hours a day, with no human stimulation, no exercise, and at the same time he is being pressured, using the death penalty as blackmail, to turn on WikiLeaks and Assange. So far, he is not cooperating, but he is very young, and who knows what they will do next? Bradley Manning has not been convicted of anything, and yet he is being subjected to severe punishment, and all this under a Democratic administration. What a giant farce this country has become, and the laughing-stock of the world! Bradley Manning and Julian Assange are truly heroic, and I thank them for their self-sacrifice!
 
 
+10 # genierae 2010-12-15 06:58
Mr. Schaefer, if this were a true democracy, you might have a point. However, there are many government crimes that have been classified as secret, so that the public would not find out. Those criminals Cheney and Bush Jr., have gotten away with mass murder, wars of aggression, and torture. This is just a short list of their perfidy, and you think that its okay to keep these things secret? Yes there may be some harm done, but the benefits will far outweigh that harm. The parts must be sacrificed for the good of the whole. The world's biggest superpower is now facing the bad karma that it has accumulated for decades. It is not going to enjoy reaping the whirlwind.
 
 
+6 # burglar 2010-12-15 07:37
Firstly, not top secret and secondly, please tell me what law Assange broke. He did no more than the New York Times, why do you not go after them?
 
 
+5 # Nota Gasbag 2010-12-15 09:06
Quoting
Assange and his associates should be prosecuted, as should his supporters who did malicious damage on his behalf. This is not an issue of free speech but of the misuse of top-secret documents.


Spoken like a true government kool-aid drinker.
 
 
+2 # B. 2010-12-15 16:05
Nota Gasbag, you've given me the best laugh I've had all day. Thanks.
 
 
+3 # Pikewich 2010-12-15 14:50
Jim,

Please give us some concrete real examples of this alleged malicious damage wikileaks has caused.

So far it appears the damage has been caused by our government which is heavily documented in the public record.
 
 
+1 # vitobonespur 2010-12-15 21:11
Quoting
Assange and his associates should be prosecuted, as should his supporters who did malicious damage on his behalf. This is not an issue of free speech but of the misuse of top-secret documents.


Prosecute him? OK. Right after we prosecute Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, et al.

Since it appears we're letting the war criminals slide, perhaps give Assange and his cadre a slap on the ass, then send them home.
 
 
+3 # maddy 2010-12-15 00:38
The revenge perhaps of the United States ???--Do as told or else??
Are other countries being put under pressure to follow???
 
 
+4 # Progressive_Patriot 2010-12-15 01:07
As far as the US prosecuting him, I think he is the front man, and is intended to be out there as a target of our government. Prosecuting him focuses the attention there, and leaves the rest of the organization more able to continue operating. (Does our government even know where the documents are, or who has them?) Then it will be up to the American government to prove that he actually has had any direct contact with the documents being released. If they can't prove that the documents have ever been in his possession, they have no case.
 
 
+2 # Merschrod 2010-12-15 04:42
Progressive has a point - there is more to all of this than meets the eye. The media circus is Assange, but the real problem is poor security in the State and Military Department information systems, plus, possible international conspiracy to leak using Mannning and Wikileaks as the means. Whoe aside from Assange would gain from these leaks? What other government would gain from the distraction? Who are these women that Assange was involved with?

When these things happen try to imagione that they could be a distraction from the real action.
 
 
+6 # Shea Brown 2010-12-15 02:26
If the U.S. has any chance to get him in custody, he will never see the light of day. I hope he gets a jet to Iceland or some other place where he will not be extradited.
He has been the transparency Obama promised, but forgot to deliver. He should realize now that he should never surrender his freedom. It could mean a lifetime in a U.S. prison. The case can be tried with him absent from the courtroom,, and he can have his statement read to the court,, or even possibly have a video conference hook up,, but he would be foolish to allow himself to be arrested again. The Swedish Government should realize all this, and allow a trial to take place, if they truly feel one is justified, without him running the risk of being carted off by the U.S. government. Yeah,, I say run, and stay free.
 
 
+2 # Scott Griffith 2010-12-15 03:59
Hope he's wise wanting out of his English jail cell. Could be it's the safest place for him just now. Outside, with the routine visits required by his bail terms, he'll be a bigger target than ever. Cross fingers for him, everyone.
 
 
+3 # bk 2010-12-15 05:33
Assange didn't steal any documents. His organization just made them available to other news organizations, e.g. NY Times, the Guardian, which also published them. The only thief is the person/s who actually provided them to Wikileaks - another hero imo.
 
 
+2 # Pat Ferrara 2010-12-15 05:51
He has surely "kicked the hornets' nest"!
 
 
+2 # Tracy 2010-12-15 10:53
Truth is stranger than fiction. The whole ordeal reminds me of the Larsson trilogy.

Thank you Assange, and Wikileaks, you've given the world's ordinary citizens a tremendous gift.
 
 
+7 # donna 2010-12-15 06:27
Now that we all know what a filthy cheater the US is, we have no idea what will happen because the US is a bad sport and does not play by its own rules. The one thing that this case has done for me is to make me see that republicans and democrats are all a bunch of useless money chasing criminals. I live in this greedy ass country wishing there were somewhere else to go, then you see how long the arm of the aggression is of this country and realize there is no where to go. The world is a slave to a country that puts profits before truth and democracy. The United States is a fucking bully and has nothing to give the world but weapons and twisted lies. Greatest democracy my foot!
 
 
0 # Homer 2010-12-16 06:32
donna, you said it better than I could have....thank you. btw, in the reading I've done online I've yet to see where/how contributions to Assange (or Manning) could be made.
 
 
+1 # aajer 2010-12-15 08:18
If the state dept. wanted Assange/WikiLeaks out of the way I think they would have dispatched them by now.
It almost seems like they want this dust up.. as a diversion..? Distraction?..Decoy?
To draw attention away from something else..Rolling back health care provisions? Extending tax cuts for the wealthy..all going on in the colder than normal temperatures of the pre holiday Rush. In orchestration, Timeing is everything.
Just a guess.
 
 
+2 # Harold R. Mencher 2010-12-15 09:22
Anyone interested in hearing what's going on with Assange & the British courts & his jail environment, if you have Dish Network or Direct TV, I would watch Democracy Now today, Wednesday, Dec 12th. Amy Goodman has an extensive live interview with Assange's atty in London. I promise you that it might raise your blood pressure somewhat. If you could, I would record today's program.

I realize that Assange's atty is somewhat helpless in doing anything about Assange's situation, but it's hard for me not to get a little bit angry at him for not speaking truth to power, that is at least telling the judge in this case that his decision to hold Assange in jail without any official charges against him is not a decision based on law, but one based on politics.

In the interview with Amy Goodman, I kept on asking the atty (I know it sounds crazy) as he was describing Assanges situation & his jail conditions & that, if let out on bail, Assange has to wear a foot collar & be held under house arrest when no official charges have been submitted by Sweden, "What in hell are you doing about it?"

Why isn't he taking this to the European high court?
 
 
+1 # Pikewich 2010-12-15 14:56
Perhaps they can take it to the high court. It is an obvious abuse of his civil rights. Being placed in solitary confinement without even being charged with a crime is beyond belief.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.