Excerpt: "Bob Graham, a former US Senator who, in addition to co-chairing the Congressional inquiry into 9/11, was chairman of the US Senate Intelligence Committee at the time, disputes the FBI denials. He has long believed that there was Saudi support for the 19 terrorists, 15 of whom were subjects of the kingdom."
Former Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee Bob Graham has spent years trying to expose the links between Saudi officials and the 9/11 hijackers. (photo: Hyungwon Kang/Reuters)
Saudi Oil Executive Linked to 9/11 Hijackers
21 February 12
A Saudi Arabian accused of associating with several of the September 11 hijackers and who disappeared from his home in the United States a few weeks before the attacks on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon, is in London working for his country's state oil company.
bdulaziz al-Hijji and his wife Anoud left three cars at their luxurious home in a gated community in Sarasota, Florida - one of them new - and flew to Saudi Arabia in August 2001. The refrigerator was full of food; furniture and clothing were left behind; and the swimming pool water was still circulating.
Security records of cars passing through a checkpoint at the Prestancia gated community indicated that Mr al-Hijji's home, 4224 Escondito Circle, had been visited a number of times by Mohamed Atta, the leader of the 19-strong hijack team, who piloted American Airlines Flight 11 into the North Tower of the World Trade Centre in 2001.
The logs also indicated that Marwan Al-Shehhi, who crashed United Airlines Flight 175 into the South Tower, and Ziad Jarrah, who was at the controls of United Airlines Flight 93 when it crashed in a field in Pennsylvania, had visited the house.
All three men had trained to fly at Venice Airport, which is 19 miles from Sarasota.
A US counter-terrorist agent told The Daily Telegraph: "The registration numbers of vehicles that had passed through the Prestancia community's north gate in the months before 9/11, coupled with the identification documents shown by incoming drivers on request, showed that Mohamed Atta and several of his fellow hijackers, and another Saudi suspect still at large, had visited 4224 Escondito Circle."
The suspect was Adnan Shukrijumah, an al-Qaeda operative who is on the FBI's Most Wanted list, with a $5million bounty on his head.A decade after the world's worst terrorist attack, which claimed the lives of 3,000 people, Mr al-Hijji is resident in London, working for the European subsidiary of Saudi Aramco, Saudi Arabia's state oil company. Described as a career counsellor, he is based in the offices of Aramco Overseas Company UK Limited and lives in an expensive flat in central London.
In email correspondence with the Telegraph, Mr al-Hijji strongly denied any involvement in the plot, writing: "I have neither relation nor association with any of those bad people/criminals and the awful crime they did. 9/11 is a crime against the USA and all humankind and I'm very saddened and oppressed by these false allegations.
"I love the USA. My kids were born there, I went to college and university there, I spent a good portion of my life there and I love it."
Mr al-Hijji's account is supported by the FBI, which has stated: "At no time did the FBI develop evidence that connected the family members to any of the 9/11 hijackers … and there was no connection found to the 9/11 plot.''
Bob Graham, a former US senator who, in addition to co-chairing the congressional inquiry into 9/11, was chairman of the US senate intelligence committee at the time, disputes the FBI denials. He has long believed that there was Saudi support for the 19 terrorists, 15 of whom were subjects of the kingdom. He cites two secret documents to which he has recently had access.
The first document, Graham says, is "not consistent with the public statements of the FBI that there was no connection between the 9/11 hijackers and the Saudis at the Sarasota home. Both documents indicate that the investigation was not the robust inquiry claimed by the FBI."
Mr al-Hijji, 38, moved with his family to Britain in 2003, setting up home in a rented four-bedroom detached house in the Southampton suburb of Totton. His stay there appears to have been uneventful.
The al-Hijjis' abrupt departure from Sarasota aroused the suspicion of their next-door neighbour, Patrick Gallagher. He emailed the FBI within two days of 9/11 to report the disappearance of the couple and their young children.
Reports released recently by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement refer to the "suspicious manner and timing" of the family's departure.
One document states: "In mid-August 2001 the above subjects purchased a new vehicle and renewed the registration on several other vehicles. On Aug 27 2001 a moving truck appeared and moved the subjects out of the house. Left behind were the vehicles and numerous personal belongings, including food, medicine, bills, baby clothing etc."
The document goes on to state that Mr al-Hijji and Esam Ghazzawi, his father-in-law and the owner of the Escondito Circle house, had been "on the FBI watch list" prior to 9/11.
Mr al-Hijji described the allegations against him as "just cheap talk" and denied having abandoned his home in undue haste, explaining: "No, no, no. Absolutely not true. We were trying to secure the [Aramco] job. It was a good opportunity."
He said his wife and children followed him out to Saudi Arabia a few weeks after he left. She and his American-born mother-in-law had been questioned by the FBI when they returned to the United States to settle the family's affairs.
But he was not questioned when he returned to America for a two-month period in 2005.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |











Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
"In a very brief space we neared our victim, a large merchantman, whose appearance promised at once an easy conquest and a rich booty. At a signal from Stamar, a shot was fired across her bows to bring her to. She immediately hoisted a white flag." http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/16900.html
Huh?
There's no doubt that the Saudi government was up to its nose in the 9-11 plot. So was the Pakistani intelligence agency. But both intelligence agencies are really subsidiaries of the CIA. If they did something like transfer cash to Atta and others, they did it on orders from the CIA.
Any sane person by now knows that 9-11 was an inside job, a false flag operation. The proof keeps trickling in. But there will never be a competent investigation by any agency of the US regime. In fact, there will be just the opposite -- continued cover ups.
You are absolutely correct, DaveM. The commenters on any RSN thread rarely have a passing acquaintance with the Laws of Formal Logic. How else to explain the negatives on your observation ?
They actually amount to "thumbs down" on the Laws of Formal Logic itself. Thinking from emotion, rather than from intellect.
The "thumbs down" don't "LIKE" the Laws of Formal Logic. Sorry Kids, nobody cares whether you "Like" the Laws of Formal Logic or the Laws of Gravity either. The laws simply are what they are, immune to petulant opinion.
You are suggesting the logical fallacy of category error by suggesting that anyone could present a fact based argument in the RSN response boxes.
Thinking from a premise to a logical conclusion takes no more time or space than an emotional rant based upon uninformed opinion.
What used to be known as "common sense" is simply not that "common" anymore.
Common sense, and the methods of formal logic go hand in hand if allowed to do so, and they represent the difference between trained critical thinking and knee-jerk emotionally-driven opinion.
This is not a matter of space.
And, to your last point, any argument that is not based upon the facts that make up a valid premise is automatically logically invalid. It's always refreshing to brush up on a little Plato from time to time.
"Argument" does not mean bickering. It means the logical process from premise to conclusion, and it was developed to help the human being discover "holes" that gather in all of our intellectual processes.
It was also developed as a weapon against fast-talkers and shysters.
A logical conclusion can be stated in one sentence.
Even so called "demonstrable facts" are subject to interpretation! Perhaps real logic is interpretation free from the drama and ego in interpretation?
There's a big difference between a call to similar minded people and an argument.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/1559151.stm
This, of course, makes the whole issue even more complex, but there are endless reasons for rejecting the official 9/11 story as an absurd fantasy.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/1559151.stm
This, of course, makes the whole issue even more complex, but there are endless reasons for rejecting the official 9/11 story as an absurd fantasy.
Who is culpable: long story short those who control the US Gov't: i.e. OIL WEALTH. To what lengths would they go? Well they have a mandate to create profit... any losses of life are merely externalities, costs the corporation doesn't have to pay for so the cost is literally passed on to your gov't and it's people, you.
And the appalling record of both the FBI and CIA in covering up everything from the Warren Report and before, to the truth about East Timor and far beyond and to this day.
I would tend to venture that ANYTHING they put out on the owner-media public airwaves (including PBS these days) should be disbelieved and in fact reversed in message and intent to arrive at an approximation of the truth.
This is no different and you just have to be possessed of a little common-sense to see the Saudi connection -and why they were screened out of all culpability.
And to "Dave M"; I don't have room to post all the links, as usual too torturous for us and the space we have on RSN. Do y'r own digging like I did and am still doing, if you care enough and are not amnesiac like most of the US consumers of the owner-media.
It has always amazed me how many Americans are content to swallow whole the fiction provided by the 9/11 Commission, to simply deny all the bald inconsistencies , scientific anomalies, unanswered questions and political doublespeak. This kind of willful ignorance was equally true toward the Warren Commission report 50 years ago, not to mention the investigations into the murders of MLK and RFK.
I'm always reminded of Jack Nicholson's arrogant but blunt diatribe in "A Few Good Men", "You want the truth?! You can't handle the truth!". Our shadow government relies on this American trait in general, and especially in the case of major catastrophes, with 9/11 at the top of the list. Perhaps this revelation, and Bob Graham's gutsy opposition to the FBI, may crack open the crypt on this one, finally. As long as we need Saudi oil, however, I would bet heavily against it.
I have long felt that the FBI was our own secret police. So, why are we shielding the Saudi Govenment? MONEY & OIL. The day will come when oil and gas are no longer needed in our country, and watch the Saudi's run for cover then.
A lot of people have figured this out some time back, while the media keeps reporting these little gems as if they were surprising, and politicians continue to prevaracate, continuing to work on fooling the American people.
Our government picks up innocent people off the street and incarcerates them but leaves this Mr. Hijji scott free?
Top Secret America, and then we'll see how you think.
It is quite a read. 824,000 human beings with "top secret" clearance. Didn't Ben Franklin say that three people can keep a secret if two of them are dead.
Good Luck.
makes sense, if you use novocaine as a recreational drug...
and why would this great saudi conspirator who allegedly ran away to avoid detection (?) be so easy to find now, out in the open wherever he is working at present?
logic and critical thinking are not the friends of fantasy, as will be explained by one of the chosen, special mentalities who seem to understand these things better than most of us but not understand that they help keep us a divided and horribly negative force in the world by seeking fantasy ego gratification instead of material social change...
As the Romans asked: "Qui bono?"
Who else profited? Halliburton did OK, and the rest of US oil interests. The military, and the congressmen from military-heavy states. The great Federal power grab of the PATRIOT Act, etc.
Think for a minute and you can think of a few more who stood to gain from our "pro-life" govenment bombing innocent Iraqi women and children.
RSS feed for comments to this post.