Intro: "The Pentagon doesn't know what happened to more than $100 million in cash held at Saddam Hussein's palace in Baghdad during the Iraq war, according to a new report by the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction."
Pallets stacked with shrink-wrapped US $100 bills arriving in Iraq in May of 2004. (photo: Scott Applewhite/AP)
Pentagon Unable to Account for Missing Iraqi Millions
31 January 12
he Pentagon doesn't know what happened to more than $100 million in cash held at Saddam Hussein's palace in Baghdad during the Iraq war, according to a new report by the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction.
What's more, the Pentagon can't find documents to explain what it spent as much as $1.7 billion on from funds held on behalf of the Iraqi government by the New York Federal Reserve, the report says.
The missing records raise new questions about how the US government handled billions of dollars in Iraqi funds during the war.
The new report, the latest in a multi-year investigation by the inspector general into missing money in Iraq, paints a picture of Pentagon officials digging through boxes of hard copy records looking for missing paper copies of Excel spreadsheets, monthly reports and other paper documents that should have been kept detailing what the money was spent on and why those expenditures were necessary. Apparently, there are no electronic records to back up the spending.
The Inspector General's report concludes that the problem is simply one of "records management." But the report explains the missing records make it impossible to conduct a complete accounting of what happened to the funds.
The missing money came from the Development Fund for Iraq, a cache of billions of dollars in frozen Saddam Hussein regime assets that was held at the New York Federal Reserve on behalf of the Iraqi people.
After the Coalition Provisional Authority turned over sovereignty to the new government of Iraq in 2004 after the US invasion, the government of Iraq turned over about $3 billion of the money to the Pentagon to help pay for contracts the CPA had authorized before it ceased operations. Of that money, most was held in an account worth about $2.8 billion at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and the remainder, $217.7 million, was held in cash in Saddam's palace.
While the New York Federal Reserve was able to provide the Inspector General with some information on electronic payments made from the funds it held, the Department of Defense was unable to provide documentation to explain why it had authorized that expenditure of $1.7 billion of the funds held at the New York Fed. And although the Pentagon spent $193.3 million of the cash at the presidential palace, officials there told the Inspector General that they could not find documents to support $119.4 million of that spending.
The Federal Reserve Board of New York told the inspector General that all it needed to make payments from the DFI account was authorization of certain officials at the Central Bank of Iraq. And the New York Fed also said it had written authorization for $2.7 billion that was spent from the DFI account. Much of that money may have been spent on US Army Corps of Engineers projects.
But the Department of Defense, (DoD) can't say specifically because it can't locate the records, the Inspector General said. According to the report, "DoD officials have Excel spreadsheets supporting about $1 billion of the $2.7 billion, or 37%, it used from the sub-account. These spreadsheets cover the first four months of payments from the sub-account following the CPA's dissolution. DoD is looking for documentation supporting the remaining $1.7 billion in payments."
The Defense Department told the Inspector General it had conducted an exhaustive search for the paperwork. "Comptroller officials told us they reviewed more than 100 boxes of hard copy files and conducted multiple electronic database searches of DFI documents in their attempt to locate the missing spreadsheets," the report said. It added that Defense Department officials said there were no backup records.
In written comments responding to the new report, the Pentagon's Deputy Chief Financial Officer Mark Easton wrote that the Defense Department acknowledges "the difficulty in locating DFI documents for the entire period (2004-2007) is due to a records management issue."
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |











Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
But fail to pay your hundreds or thousands of tax dollars and it will be tax-payer funded privatized prisons for you. How else could they lose, misappropriate or steal tax dollars if people don't pay? And won't their tax-funded criminal enterprises be jeopardized if they actually catch culprits and bring them down?
It's all a house of cards and the glue that holds it together is tax dollars. With their infinite money they do as they please. If it's gone, they didn't steal it, they simply moved it secretly toward covert operations. So don't worry your pretty heads over it, peasants.
And national security, well, that's a relative term. In that, they are the nation, so if it's toward their ends, it's national security. And who should know better than they, what threats are? They are the causes and the solutions. The merely rhetorically important citizens are really only pawns and tools, populations and feet on the ground, assets for government intelligence.
And if the people, the right people or many, many, many people, get really hissy -- and if it suits their agenda, as a distraction -- they may stage an entertaining investigation and trial -- for some lesser charge ... all the way up to Presidential pardon, if necessary.
Don't expect too much. Now that they have pushed back and quelled the OWS surge, they are again, untouchable.
You know why I can be bought? Because I don't have enough faith in the American people to do anything about this. They talk a good game, but they are like the law-abiding NRA folks with their "cold, dead fingers" bumper stickers; when it gets down to the nut and SOCOM, or a Predator Drone comes calling, they'll roll over like little bitches. The best you'll get out of them is a vote and some rant like this on the internet. Maybe some bar talk.
When I see a constituency with the courage of it's convictions, or a real leader worth his/her salt, then I'll turn down the money and fight. Until then, it's back on the couch with the rest of them. Hmmm, wonder what's on "Friends" tonight. (Did I just date myself? LOL!)
In other words, this money is gone. Some one took it. And I don't fucking blame them. More power to them. They saw their chance and they had the balls to take it. Go Halliburton!
'cause that's how he roll. Knockin' heads and sh!t.
Just like he stepped in and cleaned up the Minerals Management Service and averted a catastrophe.
Just like he strengthened and righted the EPA, the FDA, the SEC, the FCC, the OMB, the OSP, the DOD, the CIA, the FBI, and the White House.
He da man.
Actually, this seems like not much of an article - considering the BILLIONS lost a few years ago by a few "private contractors".
""More money for the Pentagon, CBS News Correspondent Vince Gonzales reports, while its own auditors admit the military cannot account for 25 percent of what it spends. According to some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions," Rumsfeld admitted." http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/01/29/eveningnews/main325985.shtml
Boy, I could sure use just a fraction of that lucre (they were bringing in boxes of $1,000 bills by the truckload remember), so freely-dispensed and unaccounted-for and allegedly SO-O-O despised-by-the-right's Military-Industrial Socialism, to help out my patheic li'l ol' small business here -but then I don't want to kill or have power over anybody -just make a decent living and be a community asset: shame on me for my lack of griping ambition!
Fingers to lips and Wilma Flintstone giggle -"Tee-heheheheh!
As it is, if there was enough outcry, the military would do some BS whitewash and you know they'd find a couple of Lance Corporals took a few bundles and their heads would roll; but the real culprits are sunning themselves on some beach somewhere; friends of Dick Cheney.
RSS feed for comments to this post.