Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Intro: "The Pentagon doesn't know what happened to more than $100 million in cash held at Saddam Hussein's palace in Baghdad during the Iraq war, according to a new report by the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction."

Pallets stacked with shrink-wrapped US $100 bills arriving in Iraq in May of 2004. (photo: Scott Applewhite/AP)
Pallets stacked with shrink-wrapped US $100 bills arriving in Iraq in May of 2004. (photo: Scott Applewhite/AP)



Pentagon Unable to Account for Missing Iraqi Millions

By Eamon Javers, CNBC News

31 January 12

 

he Pentagon doesn't know what happened to more than $100 million in cash held at Saddam Hussein's palace in Baghdad during the Iraq war, according to a new report by the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction.

What's more, the Pentagon can't find documents to explain what it spent as much as $1.7 billion on from funds held on behalf of the Iraqi government by the New York Federal Reserve, the report says.

The missing records raise new questions about how the US government handled billions of dollars in Iraqi funds during the war.

The new report, the latest in a multi-year investigation by the inspector general into missing money in Iraq, paints a picture of Pentagon officials digging through boxes of hard copy records looking for missing paper copies of Excel spreadsheets, monthly reports and other paper documents that should have been kept detailing what the money was spent on and why those expenditures were necessary. Apparently, there are no electronic records to back up the spending.

The Inspector General's report concludes that the problem is simply one of "records management." But the report explains the missing records make it impossible to conduct a complete accounting of what happened to the funds.

The missing money came from the Development Fund for Iraq, a cache of billions of dollars in frozen Saddam Hussein regime assets that was held at the New York Federal Reserve on behalf of the Iraqi people.

After the Coalition Provisional Authority turned over sovereignty to the new government of Iraq in 2004 after the US invasion, the government of Iraq turned over about $3 billion of the money to the Pentagon to help pay for contracts the CPA had authorized before it ceased operations. Of that money, most was held in an account worth about $2.8 billion at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and the remainder, $217.7 million, was held in cash in Saddam's palace.

While the New York Federal Reserve was able to provide the Inspector General with some information on electronic payments made from the funds it held, the Department of Defense was unable to provide documentation to explain why it had authorized that expenditure of $1.7 billion of the funds held at the New York Fed. And although the Pentagon spent $193.3 million of the cash at the presidential palace, officials there told the Inspector General that they could not find documents to support $119.4 million of that spending.

The Federal Reserve Board of New York told the inspector General that all it needed to make payments from the DFI account was authorization of certain officials at the Central Bank of Iraq. And the New York Fed also said it had written authorization for $2.7 billion that was spent from the DFI account. Much of that money may have been spent on US Army Corps of Engineers projects.

But the Department of Defense, (DoD) can't say specifically because it can't locate the records, the Inspector General said. According to the report, "DoD officials have Excel spreadsheets supporting about $1 billion of the $2.7 billion, or 37%, it used from the sub-account. These spreadsheets cover the first four months of payments from the sub-account following the CPA's dissolution. DoD is looking for documentation supporting the remaining $1.7 billion in payments."

The Defense Department told the Inspector General it had conducted an exhaustive search for the paperwork. "Comptroller officials told us they reviewed more than 100 boxes of hard copy files and conducted multiple electronic database searches of DFI documents in their attempt to locate the missing spreadsheets," the report said. It added that Defense Department officials said there were no backup records.

In written comments responding to the new report, the Pentagon's Deputy Chief Financial Officer Mark Easton wrote that the Defense Department acknowledges "the difficulty in locating DFI documents for the entire period (2004-2007) is due to a records management issue."

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+20 # nice2blucky 2012-01-31 16:14
First it's billions, then it's millions. What will it be next? My guess, billions again.

But fail to pay your hundreds or thousands of tax dollars and it will be tax-payer funded privatized prisons for you. How else could they lose, misappropriate or steal tax dollars if people don't pay? And won't their tax-funded criminal enterprises be jeopardized if they actually catch culprits and bring them down?

It's all a house of cards and the glue that holds it together is tax dollars. With their infinite money they do as they please. If it's gone, they didn't steal it, they simply moved it secretly toward covert operations. So don't worry your pretty heads over it, peasants.

And national security, well, that's a relative term. In that, they are the nation, so if it's toward their ends, it's national security. And who should know better than they, what threats are? They are the causes and the solutions. The merely rhetorically important citizens are really only pawns and tools, populations and feet on the ground, assets for government intelligence.

And if the people, the right people or many, many, many people, get really hissy -- and if it suits their agenda, as a distraction -- they may stage an entertaining investigation and trial -- for some lesser charge ... all the way up to Presidential pardon, if necessary.

Don't expect too much. Now that they have pushed back and quelled the OWS surge, they are again, untouchable.
 
 
+10 # Willman 2012-01-31 17:13
Maybe wiki leaks has them.
 
 
+7 # Huck Mucus 2012-01-31 18:00
I could be bought. Give me some of that. I'll take $35 million and shut up.

You know why I can be bought? Because I don't have enough faith in the American people to do anything about this. They talk a good game, but they are like the law-abiding NRA folks with their "cold, dead fingers" bumper stickers; when it gets down to the nut and SOCOM, or a Predator Drone comes calling, they'll roll over like little bitches. The best you'll get out of them is a vote and some rant like this on the internet. Maybe some bar talk.

When I see a constituency with the courage of it's convictions, or a real leader worth his/her salt, then I'll turn down the money and fight. Until then, it's back on the couch with the rest of them. Hmmm, wonder what's on "Friends" tonight. (Did I just date myself? LOL!)

In other words, this money is gone. Some one took it. And I don't fucking blame them. More power to them. They saw their chance and they had the balls to take it. Go Halliburton!
 
 
+5 # CandH 2012-01-31 20:05
Bravo! The sentiment you have just eloquently yet vividly described is very palpable. We all feel a belligerence and terseness when confronted with this kind of the blatant in-your-face grift of years and years of hard-earned taxes just "disappearing" into the seminally gangster abyss. You nailed it.
 
 
+12 # Dave45 2012-01-31 20:03
There go those zany fellows at the Defense Department again--a billion here, a billion there. Pretty soon we're going to be talking about real money.
 
 
+2 # John Gill 2012-01-31 21:59
Not from Mitt's point of view! ;)
 
 
+3 # Billy Bob 2012-02-01 09:14
Yeah, they're pretty wacky alright! It's like watching a bad juggler throwing puppies in the air, except that instead of a bad juggler, it's an overtly corrupt military/police state and instead of puppies, it's an untold amount of American tax dollars.
 
 
+3 # motamanx 2012-01-31 22:31
There are no dates mentioned in the article. I assume that the responsibility for the missing funds belongs to the Bush/Cheney administration and not that of President Obama.
 
 
+2 # nice2blucky 2012-02-01 06:55
And surely Obama has the ship in order by now.

'cause that's how he roll. Knockin' heads and sh!t.

Just like he stepped in and cleaned up the Minerals Management Service and averted a catastrophe.

Just like he strengthened and righted the EPA, the FDA, the SEC, the FCC, the OMB, the OSP, the DOD, the CIA, the FBI, and the White House.

He da man.
 
 
+3 # ericlipps 2012-02-01 06:37
Where did the money go? An audit of the books of the Republican National Committee covering the relevant period might be interesting . . . !
 
 
+6 # michelle 2012-02-01 07:31
How about getting a list of names of the incompetent, untrained, young Republican types that were sent to "govern" Iraq under Paul Bremmer's regency? Drive by their houses and see if they are living especially well. Check Bremmer's place, too, while you're at it. That cash has to be somewhere.
 
 
+1 # Kootenay Coyote 2012-02-01 08:47
So let the Pentagon pay the Iraqis back, right, & then patch up their books? Whose money was it, anyway?
 
 
+2 # Billy Bob 2012-02-01 09:12
Hey if it's missing I wonder if they've checked under one of the couch cushions. When I lose track of millions of dollars, that's usually where it is.

Actually, this seems like not much of an article - considering the BILLIONS lost a few years ago by a few "private contractors".
 
 
+3 # CandH 2012-02-01 09:37
The money is gone, and that's the ongoing tip-o-iceberg in that five-starred building (how DID the MIC get so powerful?!:)

""More money for the Pentagon, CBS News Correspondent Vince Gonzales reports, while its own auditors admit the military cannot account for 25 percent of what it spends. According to some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions," Rumsfeld admitted." http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/01/29/eveningnews/main325985.shtml
 
 
+6 # reiverpacific 2012-02-01 11:36
Try looking under the "Biggest Embassy in the World", which can be seen from space- and the bribery of the warlords unleashed from Saddam's shackles by "Shock and Awe" to allow the US to operate in the country, the open-ended no-bid contracts given to KBR, Haliburton and it's other subsidiaries, Bechtel (for sub-standard work at that) and the former Blackwater's private murderers (sorry -"Contractors), now Xe in self-imposed x-ile in nearby Bahrain for the funds. Oh aye, and in the C.I.A.'s seemingly bottomless Black Budget! And yet many regular boots-on-the-ground troops had to find their own armor for themselves and their so-vulnerable Humvees!
Boy, I could sure use just a fraction of that lucre (they were bringing in boxes of $1,000 bills by the truckload remember), so freely-dispensed and unaccounted-for and allegedly SO-O-O despised-by-the-right's Military-Industrial Socialism, to help out my patheic li'l ol' small business here -but then I don't want to kill or have power over anybody -just make a decent living and be a community asset: shame on me for my lack of griping ambition!
 
 
0 # Billy Bob 2012-02-01 15:47
I LOVE YOUR COMMENTS!
 
 
+1 # reiverpacific 2012-02-01 21:00
Quoting
I LOVE YOUR COMMENTS!

Fingers to lips and Wilma Flintstone giggle -"Tee-heheheheh!
 
 
0 # Michael Lee Bugg 2012-02-02 12:12
I remember that under Paul Bremmer's expert care $8,000,000,000 of Iraqi oil money was lost in late 2003 or early 2004 with no explanation. Then in late 2004 I remember reading about (in more than one place) $9 Billion in shrink rapped hundred dollar biils on pallets carried by our C-130 transports that disappeared without a trace and no outrage by Bush or any other Republican! No investigation was ever mentioned by Bush or the lame-stream news media! Then there was the Billion dollars in American cash found in the wall of a Baghdad house that never was followed to see where it went but some low ranking soldiers were convicted of pocketing a couple thousand after they found it! Then there were numerous reports about contractors getting paid millions of dollars for work partially done, poorly done, or not done at all! In early 2011 a report came out that for the year 2009 almost $9 billion tax dollars could not be accounted for and it was not the first year it happened! Defense contractors have been ripping us off for billions with cost-plus contracts and poorly made weapons since WW2 if not sooner. And the hypocrite Republicans are now trying to create a scandal out of the $500 million Obama approved for Solyndra! Of course they can count on ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC, PBS, NPR, Fox News and a host of other news outlets to AVOID pointing out their lies and hypocrisy!!!
 
 
+4 # ABen 2012-02-01 11:50
I suspect an independent audit of Haliburton and KBR might shed some light in this area. The Bush era crew told us they were the 'professionals' stepping in to save us from the Lefty Clintons. What they meant was 'professional liars, thieves and con-men stepping in to fleece the taxpayer for their own benefit.
 
 
+2 # Huck Mucus 2012-02-01 17:29
If Obama had any sack there would be a full-fledged, independent *F.B.I.* investigation with some boyscout heading it up.

As it is, if there was enough outcry, the military would do some BS whitewash and you know they'd find a couple of Lance Corporals took a few bundles and their heads would roll; but the real culprits are sunning themselves on some beach somewhere; friends of Dick Cheney.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.