Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Intro: "The Massachusetts attorney general has filed a lawsuit against five large US banks accusing them of deceptive foreclosure practices, a signal of ebbing confidence that a multi-state agreement can be worked out. Attorney General Martha Coakley said on Thursday she filed the lawsuit partly because it has been taking too long to hammer out a nationwide settlement."

Multiple versions of a signature by Linda Green on foreclosure documents for several banks. (photo: The Washington Post)
Multiple versions of a signature by Linda Green on foreclosure documents for several banks. (photo: The Washington Post)



Massachusetts Files Major Foreclosure-Abuse Lawsuit

By Tim McLaughlin and Aruna Viswanatha, Reuters

02 December 11

 

he Massachusetts attorney general has filed a lawsuit against five large U.S. banks accusing them of deceptive foreclosure practices, a signal of ebbing confidence that a multi-state agreement can be worked out.

Attorney General Martha Coakley said on Thursday she filed the lawsuit partly because it has been taking too long to hammer out a nationwide settlement.

For more than a year, state and federal officials have been negotiating a deal in which banks would pay billions of dollars in fines - to go toward housing relief - in exchange for legal protection against future suits.

The Massachusetts lawsuit, filed in state court in Boston, accuses Bank of America Corp, JPMorgan Chase & Co Inc, Citigroup Inc, Wells Fargo & Co and GMAC of deceptive foreclosure practices, such as using robo-signers and false documents.

"Our suit alleges that the banks have charted a destructive path by cutting corners and rushing to foreclose on homeowners without following the rule of law," Coakley said in a statement.

The attorney general in Iowa, Tom Miller, who is leading the negotiations for the states, said in a statement they hope to reach a settlement "soon." He also said Coakley had indicated she is still open to joining the settlement.

"We're optimistic that we'll settle on terms that will be in the interests of Massachusetts," Miller said.

However, analysts said Coakley's lawsuit is a bad sign for banks, which hope a deal with states and federal authorities could help the industry move beyond the legal fallout that has dogged it since the peak of the financial crisis.

"I can't say anything is dead, but it sure looks like this is a negative. The banks are going to have these suits out there for years." said Paul Miller, a bank analyst with FBR Capital Markets.

The mortgage servicing units of the five banks are accused of taking shortcuts as a way to deal with a deluge of foreclosures in the wake of the 2008 credit crisis.

State attorneys general, the Justice Department, and other federal officials have been talking with the banks for more than a year.

The discussions have been bogged down by states concerned the deal was either too lenient or provided the wrong kinds of relief, and by the banks who sought release from mortgage-related claims beyond the original conduct at issue.

Going It Alone?

The Massachusetts complaint accuses the banks of using fraudulent documents when processing foreclosures; of foreclosing on properties without holding the actual mortgage; and of failing to uphold promises to modify loans for the state's homeowners.

It also names the banks' private mortgage registry, MERS, as a defendant, accusing it of dodging fees and corrupting the state's land recording system.

On Thursday, Coakley was firm that she would not sign a mortgage settlement that included "broad liability release regarding MERS and other issues."

A person familiar with the talks said Massachusetts has sought to protect its ability to pursue certain claims against the banks for their use of MERS. Those liability issues are still being hashed out in negotiations, the person said.

The banks targeted in the suit said Coakley's move imperils chances for broader relief.

Bank of America said in a statement that a collaborative resolution, rather than continued litigation, would more quickly heal the housing market and help drive an economic recovery.

Chase said in a statement that it is disappointed Massachusetts filed a lawsuit when negotiations are ongoing on a broader settlement that it said could bring immediate relief to borrowers.

GMAC said it was unhappy that Massachusetts "elected not to continue a more constructive path that could help borrowers in the state, but rather has chosen to use the court process."

Wells Fargo disagreed with Coakley that it has not kept a promise to modify loans.

Citi said it had not yet reviewed the lawsuit, but the bank believes it has operated appropriately and in compliance with existing laws.

Coakley, who took office in 2007, has been aggressive in moving against Wall Street firms and U.S. banks. Her office said it has secured more than $600 million in relief for investors and borrowers, while keeping more than 24,000 people in their homes.

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+16 # LessSaid 2011-12-02 09:03
I am glad somebody is finally realizing that you can't rely on the one's who created the crisis/problem, aren't the one's to fix the problem.
 
 
+5 # LiberalLibertarian 2011-12-02 09:05
Dear Ms. Coakley,

I shot the sheriff. When the sate sent in a deputy to arrest me, I explained that I was in the middle of negotiating a deal with the judge. In return for not hanging me, I would plead guilty to owning the gun that shot the sheriff. He took me to jail anyways. When went to trail, the judge shot the deputy.

Deputy Coakley watch your back. I won't shoot you but the banks have already got a deal with the federal judges. Neither feds or the banks care a tiny bit for the law; and we are not too sure about you.

Sincerely,
The Banks
 
 
+22 # MainStreetMentor 2011-12-02 09:26
It would appear that the State of Massachusetts has MORE people in it with backbones and intelligence than just Elizabeth Warren. Way to go! Keep the miscreants' feet to the fire!
 
 
+6 # LiberalLibertarian 2011-12-02 10:16
Martha Coakley was the person that lost to Scot Brown.

She owes the people of America big time. This lawsuit may pay off that debt.
 
 
+11 # mwd870 2011-12-02 10:01
The multi-state agreement amounts to little more than a slap on the wrist for the U.S. Banks.

Attorney General Martha Coakley should be commended for filing this lawsuit accusing the banks of deceptive foreclosure practices.

I hope others follow her example and that ethical judges impose appropriate penalties.
 
 
+11 # John Locke 2011-12-02 10:52
There should be NO settlement with the Banks that lets them off the hook for trillions in fradulent foreclosures for a mere few billion, think about the people that have been ripped off by these banks, and keep pursuing these criminals until they do the right thing, if ever...if not through them in jail
 
 
+10 # Tippitc 2011-12-02 11:11
Way to go Attorney General Coakley!!!!! The banks and their henchmen are dragging their feet and now it is time for action!!! They should pay mega-billions in fines AND be subject to additional law suits. These are peoples lives they are destroying - let's not let them buy their way out of this mess with no admission of wrong doing - enough of that BS!!! When did banks become another word for casino?!?!
 
 
+7 # daveapostles 2011-12-02 11:22
Those bank people just seem to be so corrupt without an ounce of empathy.
 
 
+6 # 666 2011-12-02 14:18
Give the banks a choice:
A) Fix ALL the problems and pay total restitution
B) do it our way:
1) Nationalize the banks (since we paid the bailout for them anyway)
2) Fire all those overpaid execs
3) Cancel debts for all making less than $1 million per year
4) use the surplus to fund a national insurance program (health, disability, mortgage, the whole 9 yards)
5) And while we're being radical, institute a 90% tax for those making over $1 million/year
 
 
+6 # Buddha 2011-12-02 16:07
Even better was that federal judge that threw out the SEC-Citibank settlement, which like them all absolves the bank of any admission of guilt and prevents them from being civilly sued further. If only there were more honest AG's and judges who could fix this mess. As Jon Stewart put it yesterday, "And they sent Martha Stewart to jail for this?"
 
 
+2 # RLF 2011-12-03 07:48
Problem is the states sue, get a big settlement, and then do nothing to help home owners that got screwed. The next lawsuit should be against the states by smaller businesses that don't get special tax breaks to keep them in that state...unequal protection and application of the law. I should not be taxed extra to keep the exchange on Wall St. It should be a Federal law that no company can be given special consideration in ANY state and that will keep things a little fairer.
 
 
+2 # AMLLLLL 2011-12-04 13:39
This is a lot more important than any one state. If the banks are allowed to get away with paying even hefty fines, it doesn't change their behavior. Kamala Harris in CA has also sided with Eric Schneiderman and Coakley to whoop their a$$es. It's about time!
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.