Email This Page
add comment
read more of todays top articles

David E. Sanger and Thom Shanker report: "Nearly three weeks after Libya erupted in what may now turn into a protracted civil war, the politics of military intervention to speed the ouster of Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi grow more complicated by the day - for both the White House and Republicans. President Obama, appearing Monday morning with Australia's prime minister, tried to raise the pressure on Colonel Qaddafi further by talking about 'a range of potential options, including potential military options' against the embattled Libyan leader."

A man who recently crossed into Tunisia from Libya waits for friends at a United Nations displacement camp in Ras Jdir, Tunisia, 03/08/11. (photo: Getty Images)
A man who recently crossed into Tunisia from Libya waits for friends at a United Nations displacement camp in Ras Jdir, Tunisia, 03/08/11. (photo: Getty Images)

Washington Divided Over the Politics of Intervention

By David E. Sanger and Thom Shanker, The New York Times

08 March 11

Nearly three weeks after Libya erupted in what may now turn into a protracted civil war, the politics of military intervention to speed the ouster of Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi grow more complicated by the day - for both the White House and Republicans.

President Obama, appearing Monday morning with Australia's prime minister, tried to raise the pressure on Colonel Qaddafi further by talking about "a range of potential options, including potential military options" against the embattled Libyan leader.

Despite Mr. Obama's statement, interviews with military officials and other administration officials describe a number of risks, some tactical and others political, to American intervention in Libya.

go to original article

RSN Special Coverage: Egypt's Struggle for Democracy

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+2 # Activista 2011-03-08 08:52
It is ugly civil war - tribal war - like in Iraq - US+GB are responsible ..

"Sophistication" of US foreign policy - state department is shocking - NOT one decision for LONG term US interest was made - continuing the BS NEOCON real-politics.
NeoCons present more of a danger to the US than any external enemy ...
 
 
+3 # Jim Klimaski 2011-03-08 11:08
Oh good, another war we can't afford. This is not our fight. It is the UN that should be taking the lead on this. That is what it is for. And not NATO.
 
 
+2 # Jim Klimaski 2011-03-08 11:17
Oh great, just what we don't need, another war we can't afford. This is the UN's problem. And not NATO's.

When the Congress gets though with its budget cuts - with the acquiescence of Obama - the Country will be in tatters, but we will have our 2,500 F-35 Fighters. War, war, war. Just makes me sick.
 
 
+2 # Activista 2011-03-08 12:46
UN is pretty much tool of U$rael - with US single vote veto controlling.
Now US, GB got UN scheme that UN will control Libya oil revenue.
Even BOF is more "ethical" than these robbers.
BP has to control oil - NOT a people/nation.
Never liked the Kaddafi - but US foreign policy is making him a martyr in Africa.

Are there any demonstration in Egypt, Tunisia supporting "revolutionaries " in Libya?
 
 
+2 # Activista 2011-03-08 12:58
"We should be very cautious before we give 100% support to what passes for an opposition in Libya and we certainly should vigorously oppose any UK or USA intervention in that country. Revolutionaries in Tunisia and Egypt have been very firm on this. Believing as all true revolutionaries should, it is for the Libyan people to drive their government from office."
where are the young people ...
www.organizedrage.com/2011/03/what-is-happening-in-libya-may-not-be.html
 
 
0 # CommonSense 2011-03-10 04:48
Who knows what they're talking about here?
Whose stuck their neck out and taken the risk?
Revolutionaries in Tunisia and Egypt.
 
 
+1 # don emilio 2011-03-08 15:48
Funny how the US can intervene when it "knows the players", but is afraid to when it doesn't.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.