Email This Page
add comment
read more of todays top articles

But Thomas is no ordinary activist. She is the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, and she has launched a tea-party-linked group that could test the traditional notions of political impartiality for the court.

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas with his wife Virginia, 11/15/07. (photo: Newscom)
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas with his wife Virginia, 11/15/07. (photo: Newscom)

 

Comments  

 
+3 # Guest 2010-03-16 10:44
Read all about it in the L.A. Times because as of today, March 16, the nation's so-called "newspaper of record" is completely ignoring this news.
 
 
+6 # Guest 2010-03-16 12:06
Hiring staff for a George W. Bush presidency when he has Not YET Been Selected ( 2000 election ) and she expects us to believe that she is Non-Partisan ? What a joke ! She should at least keep silent rather than tell an out-and-out Lie. ( How did she know that Bush was going to be Selected ?)

I really could care less whether she is a Member of the so-called tea drinkers group or if it is a hard liquor group. That is fine with me. But at least she could at least try to be Honest. Separate professional lives, My Foot. After 23 years of being married to Clarence Thomas, how could that be possible ? Not even if she were married to Donald Duck !
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-03-16 12:12
Is there any movement underway to impeach Clarence Thomas?
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-03-16 13:07
CityRat @ 3/16/10 11:31 does not speak for this L.A. "gurl," or L.A. in general, this is happily one of the bluest areas in the country. There should be a different standard for U.S. Supreme Court Justices and whom they choose to affiliate with. How can her husband adjudicate impartially when obviously his wife is affiliated with organizations that are encouraging people of seditious acts and treason. That's right I forgot, when they swear to uphold the Constitution when they get sworn in they only have to uphold the sections they like, like the 2nd amendment. Her husband should be impeached for many reasons especially his impartiality.
 
 
-3 # Guest 2010-03-16 13:11
I love it, she has an opinion too, just like other Americans!
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-03-16 14:20
I hope the conservative judge will do us a favor to recuse himself whenever such matters involving his wife's organization, or any other like it gets to the supreme court.
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-03-16 14:58
Just hearing she's a fan of Limbaugh and Beck tells me enough about Miss Ginni!!! She must be a real intellectual.
 
 
-1 # Guest 2010-03-16 18:43
And SO many politicians are married to journalists or lobbyists
and just about EVERY journalist is married to someone in office
Imagine that... a Supreme Court Justice, who swears on the Bible to uphold the constitution is married to a woman who actively supports bringing the constitution back to America and more specifcially convincing schools to actually TEACH it !!!
WOW that is sooooo evil of her !!!
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-03-16 21:12
Virginia Thomas is just what the "tea party" people need. How can the movement be called racist if its disciples can point to her saying, "See, we're not racist--Virginia Thomas is married to a black man!"
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-03-16 22:18
WAKE UP PEOPLE she actually said she would like to "to preserve what made America great" by being partisan and playing for the team that really screams by the corporation for the corporation...
Bought and paid for political positions...Awesome exactly what made America great for sure!
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-03-17 01:16
I think Virginia will have a bit of a surprise as a white woman married to a black man when she sees the level of racism that is sure to be driving the tea baggers. Surprise, Virginia! How do you feel about the darling "citizen patriots" now?
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-03-17 08:20
Who cares what organization Clarence's spouse heads up! He's so incredibly and absolutely predictably far right, so intellectually lacking, so in lock-step with the worst forces of reaction, I can't imagine Ginni's little tea bag group really having any influence on him anyway.
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-03-17 14:15
Thomas votes consistently with the most reactionary elements of the Court and hasn't made a comment or asked a question during amy hearings held by the Court for so many years that he's a non-entity except for his predictable vote.
What a disgrace to have him "serving" on our Supreme Court.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.