Email This Page
add comment
read more of todays top articles

Abby Phillip begins: "As President Barack Obama marks the end of the US combat mission in Iraq with a major address to the nation Tuesday evening, what should be a triumphant, 'Yes, I did' moment for him will be overshadowed by continued violence in Baghdad, the bad economy, the war in Afghanistan and the president's fading popularity."

President Obama at Arlington, 11/11/09. (photo: Kevin Dietsch/UPI)
President Obama at Arlington, 11/11/09. (photo: Kevin Dietsch/UPI)

 

Comments  

 
+10 # Guest 2010-08-30 20:36
50,000 US troops remain in Iraq, and they are still receiving combat pay. One soldier was killed in Basra just last Sunday, after the supposed end of combat operations, and the same day 5,000 men and women of the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment at Fort Hood were deployed to Iraq. Their mission will be anything but desk duty. Among other things they will accompany the Iraqi military on dangerous patrols, continue to be involved in the hunt for terrorists, and provide air support for the Iraqi military. They should be receiving combat pay, because they will be serving a combat role!

Of course the number of private contractors - who perform many of the same roles as troops, but for a lot more money - is expected to double. So this is a funny way of ending combat operations in Iraq. We are still meddling in their affairs and we are still putting our men and women in danger, and we are still spending money we don’t have. This looks more like an escalation than a draw-down to me!
 
 
-1 # Guest 2010-08-30 20:46
Well, we should be pleased that Obama kept to the official agreement to remove troops, that Bush made with Iraq prior to leaving office.
 
 
+9 # Stephanie Remington 2010-08-30 20:49
Obama didn't keep his promise. He just renamed combat troops "advisers" and added a lot more private armed contractors to replace the troops he withdrew. Will any of Obama's knee-jerk supporters notice?
 
 
+13 # Guest 2010-08-30 21:23
Everyone will notice what Global Corporate Media wants them to notice.

After 30 years of relentless Conservative efforts to bring Americans 'Less Government' through less and Less Regulation of everything Corporate, one of the many tragic outcomes of all that was the deregulation of Media Ownership Rules and the subsequent consolidation of almost all Media Enterprises in America from hundreds of separate, different and diverse entities down to where now, a very few Global Corporations own almost all Media.

97% of Americans don't stand a chance against the 3% Global Corporate Conservative Wealthy Class and their Conservative Media effort to transfer as much wealth and power unto themselves through their snake oil sales pitch to millions that '''Less Government' Means Freedom and Liberty and Prosperity For All''.., just as if its the Will of God..!

BREAK the grip a few Corporations have on Media and bring back a strong Fairness Doctrine in Media..!
 
 
-3 # angelfish 2010-08-31 00:03
The President's popularity is NOT fading. All you talking heads have jumped on the Beck/Palin bandwagon to bash him and echo their particular brand of propaganda. This man has accomplished MORE in less than TWO (2) years than the "shrub" (Thank-you, Mollie Ivins!) ever imagined in his puny little walnut of a brain. Imagine how much more Mr. Obama could have done if he had a WILLING Congress behind him. I'm sick to death of Politics and talking heads and opinionated naysayers who second guess his every move. ENOUGH already! Considering what he was left to contend with, I think he's doing a GREAT job. We need to rally 'round this man and stature we enjoyed BEFORE the "Me Firsters" almost ran us into the ground. He CERTAINLY can't do it alone. Remember, the phrase is, "Yes, WE can!".
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-08-31 01:00
While, I agree with your article. i disagree slightly with your last paragraph, when you state that: "Aside from those by President Dwight D. Eisenhower, a five-star general, speeches like Obama’s “almost never have much impact. People forget about them.” I'd say that aside from one of his final speeches before his successor took over, I don't think his speeches are remembered by many. Given the fact that the President can and does speak powerfully, let us not rush to judgment as to the impact his speech will have later tonight, You sir, might just be surprised!
 
 
+6 # Guest 2010-08-31 02:53
I don't think people notice Obama because he continued to keep the old time friend Gates, remembered him and the contra affair, and with Bush in the previous Regime, and continued to follow Bush. Iraq will always be controlled by the US, and troops kept there. The only reason some are being released is to fool the people because of the brewing war in Iran,--- thanks to the Zionist in Israel. Iran's oil pipe lines have already been struck, blamed on the Kurds and we know who is behind that.
 
 
+6 # Merschrod 2010-08-31 05:25
The problem is that it is not a dramatic moment or is there a rite of transition - no peace accord, no surrender, no lowering of the flag - nada.

Plus, the smoke and screens of "Advisors and contractors" makes it a less than transparent moment.

What the people need to be told is that unless there is a long haul of nurturturing and reconstruction, then we will have only destroyed infrastructure, made more enemies, and not gained an allie. "Success" in these "adventures" must be defined by a rebuilt country where people and government ecome our allies and able to govern themselves.

It is too bad that we are a bankrupt country and do not have the funds to rebuild Iraq. Of course the bill will be coming due in Afghanistan shortly.

How could Pres. Obama raise his popularity when being a messenger of this bad news?

I doubt that he could even frame it by showing cost reductions for Iraq expenditures - go deficit hawks go!
 
 
+6 # Guest 2010-08-31 05:38
Pakistan is destabilizing, thanks to our semi-covert war there (Obama's 'Cambodia'. Yemen and Somalia have been added to the covert side of our wars in the Muslim world. We're deeper into Afghanistan than ever before. He repackaged the role of 50,000 combat troops by call them 'advisors', and his administration cleaned up Blackwater's notorious record of gouging their no-bid contracts - and ignored their war crimes - so he could replace our troops with mercenaries.

And he did absolutely nothing about joblessness, except pour money into Wall Street and the banks.

"mission accomplished", yeah, right.

We learned nothing from Vietnam, except to upgrade our propaganda and stop counting the enemy dead. We learned nothing from this decade of war, except to outsource our wars to the private sector and call our combat troops something else.

I voted for peace and jobs and all I got were these bloody wars.
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-08-31 05:38
Mark Pirtle got it right. It's all words and spin. Semantics is Obama's forte: Changing "combat" to "advisers" (remember our "advisers" in Vietnam?); keeping upwards of 100,000 mercenaries (contractors who have committed egregious crimes against Iraqis and their own employees) there; closing Guantanamo (NOT) while building Bagram (bigger); closing his eyes to torture and those that permitted and perpetrated that horror; expanding a hopeless war in Afganistan (hence changing the name of the theater from Iraq to Afganistan); conducting unauthorized acts of war against Pakistan; calling a looming Depression a recovery by throwing fiat currency at it It appears his agenda is
to do whatever he wants (or is told to do), lawful or unlawful, because he says, "Yes, we can."
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-08-31 05:47
If this is the best that RSN can come up with, I think the premise of the website should be reconsidered.

Phil Bowler had it right on the Eisenhower citation. That was absurd. The ONLY speech that is remembered is the farewell address.

The rest of the article is dreadful. "A triumphal, 'yes I did' moment." !!! Are you serious. 50,000 troops—addition al mercenaries, a country looking more and more like a client state of Iran, violence, a continuing drain on terrible US economy. A parallel horror in Afghanistan, rumblings in Yemen and Pakistan. A triumphal moment.....Yes...in the tradition of "Mission Accomplished."

Please find better articles...
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-08-31 05:47
Obama is the best friend the Republicans have in Washington.

http://readersupportednews.org/pm-section/21-21/2652-privatizing-war

He betrayed everyone who voted for him. Politico should not be cheerleading for him. Admit it, we backed a bad guy.
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-08-31 06:01
It was more like a "cut and run" thing.
The US military was a spent force in Iraq and the war in Afghanistan will be even worse.

Imagine, a rag tag army of insurgents bringing the end of a stupid military adventure in Iraq and a rag tag army of goat herders in Afghanistan about to do the same. President Omama should have kept to his word in Afghanistan but his advisers and the military frightened him into continuing the war and that will be his downfall.
 
 
+6 # Guest 2010-08-31 06:37
I would not consider this a promise kept. The war in Iraq, a complete invention of the US, rages on with most of the nation still without even basic services and reliable electricity. Obama is not ending combat operations. He is merely substituting US government forces for private mercenaries. The authors of this illegal war have not been held to account for war crimed and crimes against humanity. Obamas is Bush's bus boy clearing the tables as the plundering of Iraq's natural wealth by a cabal of global thugs and criminals continues.
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-08-31 07:32
This will be the old "Peace with Honor" speech, compiled and re-edited from Nixon's files and now dusted off and presented to an American public that is more polarized and less informed (which hardly seems possible since the inception of the internet).We are NEVER LEAVING IRAQ! This was an investment, paid for with American tax dollars and designed to benefit a handful of wealthy corporations. Remove the oil from under the ground in Iraq and we NEVER would have been there. Afghanistan likewise has precious oil pipelines running through it from the Caspian Sea and must not be allowed to fall into other hands. This is EMPIRE doing what it does best and has always done. Entering foreign lands,killing or buying off its people and leaders,command eering the resources of value that came to its attention in the first place,leaving a puppet government to do its bidding and then leaving the country in a state of flux, and more often chaos before declaring "victory" whilst never really leaving at all.
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-08-31 11:13
A little more on Eisenhower. As a president his public statements were weak and spineless. He was not viewed as a 5 star general during his presidency. He took no stand on McCarthy, was terrible on school integration. Check out Jules Feiffer's strips from the VIllage Voice of that era.
In one of them, a typically vacant looking Ike says, "I am opposed to extremists on both sides: those that bomb the schools, and those that want to keep them open."
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-08-31 16:51
Nothing like the old carnival hand and shell game to convince an increasing war-weary public that the Iraq War is at last ending. Military officials confirm we are committed to intervention in that country for years to come, and our operations have in fact, changed minimally, if really at all.
50,000 US troops remain in Iraq, and they are still receiving combat pay. One soldier was killed in Basra just last Sunday, after the supposed end of combat operations, and the same day 5,000 men and women of the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment at Fort Hood were deployed to Iraq. Their mission will be anything but desk duty.

Of course, the number of private contractors-who perform many of the same roles as troops, but for a lot more money-, is expected to double. Then the State Department is laying plans to field their own army in an unprecedented experiment. Where do you think those monies are coming from?
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-09-02 16:19
The Obama administration has not "ended" the war / occupation of Iraq. 8,000 + U.S. Special Forces, 56,000 + U.S. military personal, 75,000 + private mercenaries and "contractors", while propping up the theocracy put in power in Iraq, are continuing the war / occupation of Iraq. This is mostly a wimpy and dishonest propaganda stunt aimed at the U.S. public (being paid for with our tax monies), and for anyone who pays attention the propaganda stunt doesn't even match statements made out of the U.S. military:

Gen. David Petraeus: "First of all we are not leaving," Petraeus insisted, adding that "there are 50,000 US troops that are remaining in Iraq" and that they retain an "enormous capability" [ http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/08/19/eveningnews/main6788279.shtml ]. Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell: "I don't think anybody has declared the end of the war as far as I know" [
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100819/ts_alt_afp/iraqunrestmilitarytroops ].
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-09-05 02:54
First I learned the "W" questions - not questions re. George W. Bush, the low I.Q. puppet whore a.k.a. WORST PRESIDENT EVER, but rather the who, what, where, when questions that constitute good reporting. Then came an education on the hardest "W" question of all: WHY.

Avoid the 'why' question in civil matters, but know that it vital and often difficult to answer in criminal matters. That was the advice I received from my dear legal mentor. And today, in the U.S. of (greed and power) A.(ddiction), we the sheeple have an immense need to ask why: why all the spin, manipulation, distraction.

I fully expected another "balloon with child inside" incident as Pres. Obama's speech began, but none was apparently needed insofar as the pres. was obviously scripted - approved by our M.I.C.T.'ed (military/industrial/corporate/terror billionaire (a.k.a.villianaire)rul ers.

Why/when did Obama sell out? What now? Surely not a return to the Bushwhacked years! UNDO THE COUP!
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-09-06 05:06
If no one has realized it as yet, I will repeat what I have contended in the beginning when GW Bush invaded Afghanistan and then Iraq. He OPENED A PANDORA'S BOX THAT WILL NOT GO AWAY FOR YEARS AND YEARS TO COME. Unless President Obama suddenly decides that enough is enough and as Commander in Chief, makes a decision to pull up stakes, no what the present situation is, and get the Hell out of All of these Mid/East countries where we have bases tha most of the people in the US Don't know about, we are in for some bad times in that part of the World, and it will be because of the decision that GW Bush made when he became Our Decider In Chief in 2000.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.