Email This Page
add comment
read more of todays top articles

Brian Beutler writes: "The first will dramatically clamp down on insurance industry waste, abuse, and excesses. Starting on New Year's Day, insurance companies will have to spend at least 80 percent of the revenues they receive from premiums on actual health care. Not on salaries or overhead."

President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and White House staff react as the final healthcare votes are counted, 03/21/10. (photo: Pete Souza/The White House)
President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and White House staff react as the final healthcare votes are counted, 03/21/10. (photo: Pete Souza/The White House)

 

Comments  

 
+14 # kalpal 2011-01-01 10:56
The only way to provide realistic universal healthcare is via a single payer system. Such a system would deeply cut into the profits of private insurers who are in the business to make money not improve national health. The presence of a massive bureaucracy whose sole reason for existing is to shift costs or deny healthcare is ample proof that "for profit" corporations are there to produce large salaries for management and to keep investors happy. The health of their primium payers has never even been as high as second on their primary goals list.
 
 
+7 # diane johnson 2011-01-01 11:34
too bad they dont have to limit how much they can spend to defeat honest medical and disability claims.
I speak of second third fourth etc. insurance company defense doctors opinions...contradicting diagnosis or recomendations of regular treating doctor, teams of lawyers, detectives, and delays in the legal system that kill...or leave them destitute. It may take decades to get a work related injury treated. Iris
 
 
+14 # Wolfchen 2011-01-01 14:24
Health Care for All…a Single Payer System...Part I:
As a former executive of an insurance company, before going into private practice, it's obvious to me and those who really want a healthy and vigorous society capable of competing in an every competitive world must demand further health care reform from our bought-and-paid-for-politicians...regardless of political party affiliation. Health care for all...single payer plan is the most cost effective means of delivering universal health care to all citizens. There is no sanely justifiable reason for keeping the insurance industry involved in health care delivery. They are unnecessary middlemen who add to overall costs. Those who proclaim otherwise either are not logically thinking through the issues...or, worse, they are lobbyists for the insurance industry.
 
 
+11 # Wolfchen 2011-01-01 14:25
Part 2:
Just think of all the forms in which Americans are being gouged by the health industries:

***Pharmaceutic al companies are overpricing their products, thereby inflicting disproportionat e economic pain on Americans. Other nations do not tolerate this nonsense, and their citizens pay much less for their medications. While Americans are being duped by these companies, those who champion such price gouging call themselves patriots, pound themselves on the back and proclaim that we Yankees are ever so clever. In their manner of convoluted thinking, hell’s bells should accompany such notions as fair play and the importance of universal health care as relates to our means of production and society at large. For them, such niceties should not deter corporate greed as exemplified by their CEOs...especially when so many frightened and uninformed camp followers stand ready to support them in their assaults on our national viability.
 
 
+10 # Wolfchen 2011-01-01 14:25
Part 3:
***CEOs are rewarding themselves with obscenely excessive compensation packages, while they stick it to the gullible citizens who view Fox “news” and the Beck-Limbaugh shock-troops as their champions. They are no longer even subtle about their using the corporations as their private piggy-banks, since they’re convinced that they can continue to fool their supporters all the time.

***Health care costs have components that factor into many forms of insurance policies: Health Care insurance, Home Owners and Liability Insurance, Workers’ Compensation Insurance, etc. The all have a health care cost provisions, thus costing Americans additional expenses via duplicative coverage provisions.
 
 
+10 # Wolfchen 2011-01-01 14:26
CONCLUSION:
Under a Health Care for All, Single payer system, most of these cost duplication components can largely be eliminated. In other words, such a system should result in lower costs of coverage from these various forms of insurance.

Mind you, when Americans finally wake up and start using their intelligence so as to demand such a form of universal health care coverage, the insurance companies and their supporters will shout that such a system is socialism. When they do, and they will...forcefully and tenaciously confront them with facts so obviously truthful that even their supporters will realized how they’ve been played for fools and demand change to a single payer universal health care system for all American citizens.
 
 
-14 # aznative 2011-01-01 15:27
socialism has NEVER worked....look at EU! Spain, Ireland, Greece...etc, all trying to keep their heads above water. Even Canada is cutting spending and taxes, b/c they're running out of money!
 
 
+8 # Suavane 2011-01-01 17:37
The Health Care Act is NOT socialism. Under socialism the government provides the Doctors, runs the hospitals, and runs the Insurance industry.

Last I checked, the Insurance and Hospital industry are still running us!

This act is but a step forward toward single payer Insurance.

Under the President's desired plan, the government would not run the hospitals, hire and fire physicians, or run the Insurance Industry.

This is NOT Socialism.

Take a closer look at the EU's Socialized medical system and you'll see the significant difference.
 
 
+4 # Lariokie 2011-01-01 23:49
aznative, you might want to look around you before you look overseas at Spain, Ireland, and Greece. The reason the world is "running out" of money is because the rich guys now have it all! Our Treasury gave it to them--some $13 trillion--and did they reinvest it in productive ways in this country? Did they take that virtually free money from the Treasury and Fed and FDIC and loan it back to American businesses and families at a reasonable and profitable rate? NO! They charge merchants 4% on every credit card transaction and more for certain transactions, then they charge the credit card holder between 12% and 20% for carrying a credit balance. It wasn't too long ago that such robbery was called usury and it was illegal.

You mistake corporate welfare with "free enterprise", of which we have plenty of the former and very little of the latter. You also mistake social democracy for Socialism, and you might be surprised how well social democracy has worked since FDR put it in place here some 65 years ago.
 
 
+3 # Wolfchen 2011-01-01 18:01
Well now...as I predicted, it didn't take long for insurance company advocates to cry "socialism". Yes, and as for socialism, a course or two would also be helpful toward realizing that there are many forms of socialism, just as there are various forms of capitalism. Of course, that would require some information input that goes beyond the Coulter and Beck types.

In fact, Health Care for All, Single Payer system has nothing to do with socialism. Of course, the realization of this fact would require not sucking in all the misinformation proffered by those who get their news from Fox types of media disseminators.

Then ironically, I’d let all of those who want cost effective universal health insurance obtain such a single payer plan so as to receive all the benefits stemming from the pooling of resources by such supporters. Then let those advocates for the insurance industry twirl slowly on the pinheads of corporate greed, denial of coverage via policy cancellations and then the ever increasing premiums...all to the detriment of even the most ardent supporters of the insurance companies. Ah yes, that would be divine justice and holy intervention.
 
 
+2 # miriamac 2011-01-02 13:22
So of the $ that the insurance companies are "forced" to accept from us they get to keep 20% for profits, executive salaries, etc.
This is reform?
 
 
+1 # Gary in Midwest 2011-01-03 09:42
Anytime the government grants and caps twenty percent profit on expenses to a corporation, it guarantees that the corporation will always want to pay more, the doctors will be encouraged to charge more, the drug and hospital costs will be encouraged to be more, and the insurance industry will beg for more costs because twenty percent of more is always greater than twenty percent of less. This is a classic example of how the government in trying to fix things just makes it worse.
 
 
+2 # JustMe 2011-01-04 00:12
Grants what? And the cap is on insurance co. profits. Hospitals and pharmaceutical firms will always charge all they can, regardless of who is paying. As will the insurance companies. So if there's any element of truth to your claim, you've made the case that it is private enterprise that is the problem, and not government. And that instead of allowing the insurers a percentage of the gross, we should allow them a flat fee per insured. Better yet, a fee that rises or drops in proportion to the ratio between outcomes and charges. Still better yet, require them to all be non-profit (like they used to have to be).
 
 
+2 # JustMe 2011-01-04 00:16
You just made the case that private enterprise is the problem. Let's require them all to be non-profit, just like the hospitals and insurers used to have to be, and like they have to be in the rest of the Western world. Better yet, let's go to single payer universal health care. I've experienced it first hand, and it works.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.