Email This Page
add comment
read more of todays top articles

John Bresnahan and Jonathon Allen report: "A hard-core group of liberal House Democrats is questioning the constitutionality of US missile strikes against Libya, with one lawmaker raising the prospect of impeachment during a Democratic Caucus conference call on Saturday."

A man carries his son as they stand near the wreckage of a US Air Force F-15E fighter jet after it crashed near the eastern city of Benghazi, 03/22/11. (photo: Suhaib Salem/Reuters)
A man carries his son as they stand near the wreckage of a US Air Force F-15E fighter jet after it crashed near the eastern city of Benghazi, 03/22/11. (photo: Suhaib Salem/Reuters)

go to original article

This article refers to "liberal House Democrats." In fact, those Representatives named are members of the House Progressive Caucus. -- ma/RSN

RSN Special Coverage: Egypt's Struggle for Democracy

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
-4 # banichi 2011-03-22 09:37
I want us out of Iraq. I want us out of Afghanistan. Neither of those wars are worthy of American lives when all we accomplish is to further the agenda of big business, enlarge the military-industrial-congressional complex.

Libya is not the same. For once, we have the chance to very carefully support people and keep them from being slaughtered by a ruthless, mad dictator who cares only for maintaining his own power and nothing for the lives of the Libyan people. Kucinich and the 'liberal democrats' have been utterly ineffective at supporting any kind of progressive agenda for the people of the United States, so now they try to undermine a president on an issue that won't lose them any re-election donations from big corporations and banks. They make me sick.

I don't like Obama, though I voted for him. He is a major disappointment for having hired the foxes to guard the henhouse of American citizens' financial well-being, and for quite apparently lying about what he was going to do once he became president versus his campaign promises.

To Mr. Kucinich and the rest of the 'liberal Democrats' who think it is more important to get their approval before going out to save lives, you should be ashamed. If America still has any honor left, it is in saving the lives of those who can't defend themselves against overwhelming odds.
 
 
0 # Yachtsman 2011-03-22 12:21
I don't disagree with you about the need to "support people and keep them from being slaughtered" by a ruthless dictator, but the same can certainly be said about stopping Saddam Husseim from killing his citizens. Libya IS the same in that regard -- plus most knowledgeable people thought Husseim was a threat to the West.
 
 
-1 # judgment 2011-03-22 19:37
fully agree in most positions. That group of Lefty you mention are the same that sunk Obama original Health Plan and left us with???? Now. on Libya, for all complaining about the money I offer a fact and an opinion.
Fact: we have been spending more money supporting the like of Mubarak and Gaddafi oppress their people that we are to help those people break free"
Opinion and questions: "would you prefer a world where millions of people trust and respect the USA (there was such time) or a world where we pay dictators to do our bidding and protect us from the consequences" Think about it is a complex question.
 
 
+7 # NCMike 2011-03-22 09:54
Anyone who thinks that we don't have troops on the ground doesn't understand how smart bombs work. The government can claim that there are no ground troops all they want, but that doesn't make it true.
 
 
+3 # Activista 2011-03-22 10:03
Defense Secretary Robert Gates led administration opponents of any U.S. role in the anti-Qadhafi operation, Secretary of State AIPAC Clinton backed calls from the French and British governments for a NATO-led effort to assist the Libyan rebels. The Clinton clique eventually prevailed in the debate, and Clinton then worked with U.S. allies to craft a U.N. Security Council resolution authorizing the mission.
Impeach Obama/Clinton
 
 
+7 # DaveW 2011-03-22 10:44
The House vote on the Afghanistan war and the reaction in the Senate to Sen.Boxer's move makes clear there will be NO impeachment. Face it folks: In November of 2008 we elected a "moderate Republican."

Bush started one war, then he made it two
Obama got elected saying what am I to do
In the land of the financier,home of the theif
The new President provided Wall St. relief
Spineless health care reform applied to the body
Had a beer, oh dear!, a kind of "race soothing tottie"
Concessions and conciliations over gays,
guns and taxes
Koch brothers profits reach historic maxes
The folks in Libya ruin our cozy little set-up
Phone call to the White House tells the President to get up
"A call for you sir, I believe its the MIC
Bush got his two wars, now I can make it three
All across the Middle East burns freedom's fire
Stoked by a renegade, red white and blue empire
 
 
+10 # Stephen Beals 2011-03-22 10:34
Congress is the entity that should be scrutinized for possible impeachment. They promised to preserve protect and defend the constitution of the United States when they were sworn into office, but have allowed presidents of both parties to usurp their role for decades. The president only has the power to fight undeclared wars because the Congress does not have the will to defend the constitution.
 
 
+15 # Ann Ferguson 2011-03-22 10:44
The problem with the mission of "saving innocent civilian lives" is that it is impossible to draw the line between doing that and fighting a war as long as one is dropping bombs. It is a mistake for the US government to have supported this action and I agree with the progressive Dems who want to hold Obama and Clinton to account here. There is also the problem of world perception of a deeper interest for getting involved: Lybian oil. Why aren't we bombing Bahrain or Yemen security forces which have been killing innocent civilians there? Because they are our allies and we need our bases there. So we have a double standard that doesn't come down to defending civilians!!
 
 
+1 # Loup-Bouc 2011-03-22 20:34
Bahrain and Yemen are not our allies. Yemen uses us when it suits Yemen. We impose our interests on Yemen when it suits us. Bahrain is our supplicant more than is Yemen, but, still, it uses us as we use it.

But the true matter is that Bahrain and Yemen are not oil rich, but Libya holds great oil resources. We have invaded Lybia not to save its citizenryt, but because our oil-profits greed is threatened by Gadhafi's and his government's instability and Gadhafi's allying with Chavez of Venezuela.

Obama does not give a damn for how many foreign nation civilians (or US troops) he kills. Witness Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan.
 
 
+8 # Ann Ferguson 2011-03-22 10:52
To Banichi
The problem with supporting the idea that the US should be protecting innocent civilians in Libya is that it is impossible to draw a clear line between that and starting a war, as has already been made clear by the bombing of Gadhafi's house and other targets that are not the airforce that have killed innocent civilians. Also, we have not opted to support innocent civilians in Yemen or Bahrain by bombing their security forces, obviously because they are military allies. So clearly we have a double standard, and it is easy to argue that the deeper motive to single out Libya from the other oppressive dictators we support is that we want to allow our corporations to control the oil there. So I support the group of progressive Dems who think the President should be challenged, even impeached on his illegal use of force in this case, without consulting Congress.
 
 
+1 # Loup-Bouc 2011-03-22 20:31
Bahrain and Yemen are not our allies. Yemen uses us when it suits Yemen. We impose our interests on Yemen when it suits us. Bahrain is our supplicant more than is Yemen, but, still, it uses us as we use it.

But the true matter is that Bahrain and Yemen are not oil rich, but Libya holds great oil resources. We have invaded Lybia not to save its citizenryt, but because our oil-profits greed is threatened by Gadhafi's and his government's instability and Gadhafi's allying with Chavez of Venezuela.

Your line-drawing is not an issue, because Obama does not give a damn for how many civilians he kills. Se Afgahanistan and Pakistan. See also Iraq, which still we are invading, despite Obama's farcical "withdrawal."
 
 
+2 # KittatinyHawk 2011-03-22 11:45
UN, NATO called us to help back them. I believe that if we expect help in future we have to help.
No one put sanctions upon Yemen, or Bahrain or Israel for that matter. Innocent people die daily.

it is time we get BinLaden or remove ourselves fro Afghanistan. Binny is at the Bush Compound very comfortable as he was during 9/11 attacks.

I believe that we see GOP not stopping President so I believe between the Nuclear oath, The New OffShore Drilling allowance the Democrats handed us another GOP. This President didnot clean up Washington when he walked into town and that has been an undoing of US Citizens. The President is not helping the Citizens of USA in the States where Jobs are going down the tubes.

If the Democrats impeach the President, they are playing GOP Song. I think it is time for Citizens of USA to stand up and be counted, We need a strong Leadership for USA which means the Rethuglicans and the Demoscraps must go.
This is not a good look with Elections in the near future.

Mr President, Ms Clinton should have been in Japan showing concern there. NRC and all Nuclear Liars should have been there the first day but they were too scared of their Safe Energy

Republican Arms Dealers could have donated some Weapons for oil, wouldnot have been first time!
 
 
+1 # Activista 2011-03-22 12:01
War on Libya is war on Africa - this is a NATO scheme.
That Libya has a dictator and he has socialist leaning - his children are reasonable and more intelligent than
Bush II - if we had dynasty - why not Libya?
 
 
+4 # aikidokurt 2011-03-22 12:03
based on 2007 dollars and published DOD logistics, it cost $36,000,000 + for the us military-industrial apperatus to kill a single iraqi insurgent; the insurgency averaged a cost of $100 per us serviceman killed. get the picture? the disaster capitalists are trying to bankrupt this nation and pick up some vassal states in the process!
 
 
+3 # motamanx 2011-03-22 12:58
Has it occurred to anyone that we have WON all the wars that Congress was advised about (and legally declared) and we have LOST (or stalemated) all the others?
 
 
0 # Loup-Bouc 2011-03-22 18:09
Obama is an arch criminal, like Bush & Cheney. He has prosecuted, even heightened, the ILLEGAL invasions Bush & Cheney started in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan, where every death, injury, displacement, and property damage is a felony and an international law crime.

Now Obama has added an illegal invasion of Libya. He has not merely helped create a no-fly zone, but attacked Libyan territory. The UN Resolution did not authorize such an attack, which also violates the US constitution, for not being authorized by Congress.

Obama has committed many other crimes, domestic ones, not only international offenses.

The House ought impeach Obama, and the Senate convict him. The D of J ought prosecute him. The federal judiciary ought convict and imprison him.
 
 
0 # motamanx 2011-03-23 07:38
Obama didn't lie to Congress in order to do it. Cheney, however, did. I am disappointed Cheney wasn't impeached. Now Obama has lost that option. It was a bad move by Obama; although not as bad as his predecessors.
 
 
+1 # Activista 2011-03-23 07:41
readersupported news.org/off-site-opinion-section/133-133/5368-us-bombs-libya-helps-jihadists
look at the map and history before you bomb (hard concept for Pentagon and State Department).
And congratulation to Bill and AIPAC Hillary Clinton scheme - Obama 2012 is caput.
 
 
0 # Realist 2011-03-23 10:52
We have already lost one fighter plane in Libya. I don't know how much a fighter plane costs, but it is in the millions of dollars. We were fortunate the pilot bailed out. The constitution clearly states that war can be declared only by the House of Representatives . Not after the war is started, but before a war can be started. Violators include Bush and Obama. They declared the war and then sought the permission of Congress. Both of them should be impeached. It is not too late for either.
 
 
-1 # Activista 2011-03-23 11:38
the same people - NEOCONS - who invaded Iraq under the false pretension cooked this schema - the next war - again all lies.
To list them - Clinton, Lieberman. McCain ...While applauding Barack Obama’s involvement of U.S. forces in air strikes, influential neo-con Bill "Kristol told Fox News that America should go further than merely bombarding Libya and send in ground troops as “peacekeepers,” embroiling the bankrupt United States in yet another foreign occupation while enabling Muslim extremists fighting Gaddafi to rise to power." and Fox News leads -
 
 
+1 # Yachtsman 2011-03-23 18:52
I do believe you must watch FOX News more than the conservatives do.
 
 
0 # Activista 2011-03-23 12:16
how the NATO propaganda is made -
www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xss0Ep1MJM
when we will learn?
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.