Coleen Rowley, a FBI special agent for more than 20 years, was legal counsel to the FBI field office in Minneapolis from 1990 to 2003. They begin: "If WikiLeaks had been around in 2001, could the events of 9/11 have been prevented? The idea is worth considering."
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange speaks at a news conference at the Frontline Club in central London, 07/26/10. (photo: Andrew Winning/Reuters)
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |







Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
FBI officials in Washington inexplicably turned down Samit's request Unquote.
Every one of these officials need to be closely investigated for treason.
IMHO,that's why it needed to be nipped in the budd, as 911 was not ready to be revealed to the public just then.
Again QUOTE;
we were ordered not to write up our reports vulnerabilities .... Finally, the FAA started providing advance notification of when we would be conducting our 'undercover' tests and what we would be checking."
Unquote.
In each case,such officials stood in the way of anyone discovering 911 and the dots leading to same, this is NOT Coincidence.
The question that should be on every American's lips today, is WHY, and from whence did these officials get their instructions ?
IMHO, these officials ARE the loose threads that will unravel 911 for all Americans to see, who/what exactly was the offender/s behind this atrocity.
Wikileaks most likely depends upon officially sanctioned leaks, rather than the real whistle blowers.
He admits this in a recent documentary and based on it recommends others to leak sooner than he did.
Rowley wrote articles and a book. She ran for office. She went over her boss's head with her concerns. Fix was in.
How about any human being with an IQ over 80, plus some small modicum of free brain space....
Hmm. That might even still be a *majority* of the currently Frankenfood-poisoned and corporate media cartel-abused American PEOPLE.
Why don't the "Democra"..., er, Faction-B politicians seem willing to connect the dots?
A little *fear* goes a long way?
Together, over 1300 licensed architects and engineers have assembled more than enough evidence for a real investigation.
Why won't someone come forward and post to wikileaks? PLEASE?
Unless you are all dead. If that is the case I forgive you.
You Guys on the left actually believe that all of this was orchestrated by Bush, and Chaney. You need to move to Iran where Government doesn't deceive, and lie to their citizenry!!!
Bud Olesen
"criminal negligence," "superiors seeming indifference," "warnings against talking to the media," "frowned on whistle blowing," "serious vulnerabilities being ignored," etc. etc.
MAYBE an innocent babe could interpret these and other items as coming from typical stupid bureaucrats, but it doesn't take a professional conspiracy theorist to see the writing on the wall.
They did 9/11. They used bin Laden's name and name of his al Quieda group as a cover story so they could get by without taking responsibility; a bit like what happened to Lee Harvey Oswald.
The 911 story is WAY stupider, my friend.
Just google 'world trade center 7'
Q: You know how stupid the 911 story is?
A: Stupid enough that Everyone is supposed to see through it; and not 500, 100, or 50 years later... (if there are presumably still "Freedom of Information" Act document to come out then)
...but just as soon as they can stop being *completely brainwashed* by the (bought & paid for) corporate media cartel.
As is we have a generation of Americans who have at least heard a bit about this evidence of high treason. That's why there hasn't been a recurrence of 9/11; enough citizens wouldn't buy it.
& the kids (at least) already know the corporate media is full of paid liars.
Quoting
Quoting
Another thing is that 9/11 was a sucker punch good for one time only. The Havana model of hostage behavior only worked 3 of 4 times on the day and will never work again.
Sunday, 23 September, 2001, 12:30 GMT 13:30 UK
Hijack 'suspects' alive and well
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/1559151.stm
At Least 7 of the 9/11
Hijackers are Still Alive
National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States
The muscle hijackers 'picked by bin Ladin':
Satam al Suqami, Wail and Waleed al Shehri (two brothers) Both Alive, Abdul Aziz al Omari Alive, Fayez Banihammad (from the UAE), Ahmed al Ghamdi, Hamza al Ghamdi, Mohand al Shehri Alive, Saeed al Ghamdi Alive, Ahmad al Haznawi, Ahmed al Nami Alive, Majed Moqed, and Salem al Hazmi Alive (the brother of Nawaf al Hazmi).
How can the 9/11 Commission be taken seriously when they refer to alive 'hijackers'?
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/hijackers.html
The United States government and accomplices pulled off the biggest damn killing maneuver and lie that far surpasses all past lies, and as always, they got away with it.
For instance, JFK's head snapped backwards, therefore Oswald did not act alone. WTC towers 1, 2 and 7 fell at free-fall acceleration, therefore they did not pancake. These in turn imply that the official stories in both cases are not true.
The truth remains unknown, though that fact itself is a clue of sorts; as is the old Roman motto: qui bono? Who benefits?
They say without hesitation, citing facts both aeronautical and the physics of it, that much of what was reported was not possible in such planes, most especially by the amateurs who couldn't even fly a small plane. Their investigations are exhaustive and available to anyone.
Thousands of people around the globe have investigated the events of that day initially due to the demolition type fall of the buildings, then went on to discover many more aspects that revealed the nonsense of the reports.
Had I not researched this site and those posted above, I might not believe in an inside job myself.
I do believe we all know who is/was capable of coordinating a job this enormous and evil, and it wasn't Osama bin Laden.
There are so many suspicious aspects of 9/11 but just try convincing ordinary Americans, who pride themselves on their "common sense and moderation", of that. You'll get two words in response: "conspiracy theorist" and that's about the extent of the intellectual curiosity. Behind those words lies a sea of smugness in which the commenter is really saying: "I'm not a radical, I don't want to hear it and please quit disturbing my sleep."
The above comments are also straight to the point, and worse, folks actually take pride in NOT researching anything, as though citizens are much too aware of reality through mass media to have to do anything further. A good example is the glaring lack of airplane debris at the Pentagon and a hole and damage similar to a rocket attack. Right there in photos and television coverage.
The events of September are, in truth, a conspiracy - against U.S. citizens and the rest of the world.
RSS feed for comments to this post.