Hendrik Hertzberg begins: "Speaking from the Oval Office last Tuesday evening to mark what he called, with more hope than precision, 'the end of our combat mission in Iraq,' President Obama had occasion to mention the previous occupant. 'This afternoon,' he said ..."
President Barack Obama listens intently at the Nobel Peace Prize award ceremony in Oslo, Norway, 12/10/09. (photo: Susan Walsh/AP)
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |







Comments
"No one can say whether the suffering of the Iraqi people would have been greater or lesser if Washington had not made its choice for war."
You're hurting my brain with this. Please stop! Oh, and please...to avenge his daddy?!!! Please, dude, you're killing me here.
three branches, Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, wanted a Military solution, which would have created WWIII. But JFK
stuck to his guns and solved it with Non/Military decisions. So, a Civilian did the job as COC....Lets Let Obama alone....
So, to each component of HH's statement above, I say nay. I do in fact assert the opposite.
This article is a whitewash of the real situation. The Bush regime had all the intelligence and actual facts about Iraq prior to the invasion and chose to lie to the American people and the world about them. Tony Blair and George Bush should be in jail, not enjoying the "fruits" of their ill-gotten gains. These men are criminals as are those who assisted them in their lies and atrocities. Until justice is done and the real truth is told much of America will go on believing the myths that are continually passed off as "truth" by the media.
RSS feed for comments to this post.