Email This Page
add comment
read more of todays top articles

"A senior White House official has admitted that it was their intention to kill him. It wasn't a dead or alive situation, it was to go and kill him.... As we know, President Bush shut down the CIA station that was set up for the express purpose of finding bin Laden. He didn't even care about finding him anymore."

Michael Moore's interview on Piers Morgan Tonight, 05/06/11. (image: Piers Morgan Tonight)
Michael Moore's interview on Piers Morgan Tonight, 05/06/11. (image: Piers Morgan Tonight)

go to original article

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
-4 # Brenda 2011-05-06 20:46
Well, on one hand I can acree with Mi8chael, but on the other hand, both New York City and Washington D.C. had been under attack on 9/11/2001. Everyone there shared a deep hurt about the terorist strike in their city, and to them Osama was the modern day Adolf Hitler. There were more than just the deaths that ocurred but the turmoil for all the living remail=ning in those cities. I was apparent that G.W. Bush was uninterested in getting the man because to get the man meant his wars might stop. I see all the Republigoons getting rich from the bundle of money thrown into the Al Quaeda quagmire, Bush and Cheny included. It was Obama that should get the credit in the death of Osama bin Ladin, that sadistic bastard had it coming to him for a long time. On 5/02/2011 that came to pass. It says volumes about who ever wants to think they can get away with terrist attacks, there is a price that they will have to pay. Osama was in my book an anti-christ to the world. Now he goes to see God and reap his just rewards, along with every other deranged terorist that has died.
 
 
-8 # Leo 2011-05-07 12:07
Obama deserves some (not the) credit - for not stopping this operation during his 16 hours presidential "thinking". And evil republicans - for waterboarding included. But most of credits should go to other people:
http://socyberty.com/issues/white-house-insider-obama-hesitated-panetta-issued-order-to-kill-osama-bin-laden/
 
 
-2 # George D 2011-05-09 07:54
There is definitely "credit" deserved to Obama here.

I must admit that, as I listened to this interview, I had to think of my own answers to Piers Morgan's questions. It forced me to really think about how I would respond.

I was happy when I heard of Bin Laden's death. It wasn't because I felt a deep hatred for him. I probably feel as much actual hatred (or even more) for GWB and Cheney. It was because America needed this. America needed a "win" and a big one in this "war on terrrrrerrr" that the buffoons of the last decade create for us all.
I was finally sorta "proud" of America again. I felt that the right decision was made for the right mission and as dangerous and daring as it was, it succeeded.

While I have no beliefs of any kind, it does give one pause to see astounding success for somthing that seemed so right in the face of so many failures for things that seemed wrong.
 
 
+15 # Archie1954 2011-05-07 12:51
I'll agree with your comment about Osama deserving what he got when you also agree that an American sadistic bastard, Bush also get what he deserves, a nice quiet cell for the rest of his life.
 
 
+3 # khidr786 2011-05-08 03:52
tell us, simply, and exctly, what evidence You know of linking obl to the 9/11 crimes
 
 
0 # George D 2011-05-09 07:57
How about HIS OWN WORDS?
What; You think everything you don't hear first hand is a lie?
Sad to go through life with that mindset but I do understand why you might feel that way. A decade of GWB and Cheney and Republican rule in general can make anyone more than a little nuts.
 
 
+6 # Dave W. 2011-05-08 09:43
Brenda, I neither mourn nor celebrate the death of Bin Laden.He killed or orchestrated killings indiscriminatel y. His involvement in the 9/11 attacks will NEVER be 100% conclusive.Dead men tell no tales.I,for one,would have been interested in what he had to say in a public trial.Same for the Guantanamo prisoners.In any event I have a hypothetical question for you. You end your post stating: "Now he goes to see God and reap his just rewards,along with every other deranged terrorist that has died." At the wars continue in both Iraq and Afghanistan,occ asionally spilling over into Pakistan,many "innocent" lives have been lost.Estimates,depen ding on where you obtain information,ran ge from over 150,000 to perhaps a million or more. Millions more have been forced to flee their respective homelands.In the eyes of say,an Iraqi woman who has just watched the horrific death of members of her family at the hands of "coalition forces", the U.S.,Great Britain,etc. may be the "terrorist." If that definition is correct will "Bush" reap his "just rewards" from a vengeful God? Will Obama face the wrath of an angry God for killing innocents with errant Predator drone attacks? I believe if you study the "imperialistic interventions" of Western powers for the last 500+ years you'll find many potential clients suitable for your "sadistic bastard" list.Terrorism is in the eye of the beholder.
 
 
+19 # jbell94521 2011-05-06 22:42
It is not surprising that the Executive Office had killing Osama as their real intent. I don't think it would serve their interests to risk giving him a chance to testify in an open courtroom. It is too bad that more Americans do not see this as a true danger to what is left of our democracy. From reading the comments here I not am encouraged. Most assume that Osama was the architect of 911. He was NEVER even charged with that crime, let alone tried for it. There has never been an official investigation that evaluated the evidence. What little evidence against Osama has been made public could be countered by a reasonably bright first-year law student. Our government running around the world and assassinating people without any legal justification is a far bigger threat to world security than Al Quaeda could ever be. What hope can there be for us as a democratic nation and supposed leader of the free world when we so easily and thoroughly abandon the rule of law? It is disheartening that so few ask that question. I am all for impeaching Obama for taking this action. He is a political opportunist and no hero for perpetrating this Mafioso-style extrajudicial murder. I am sure that hardly anyone reading this will agree with me. Most Germans at the beginning of WWII did not agree with the few who questioned Hitler, either. We all know the outcome of that mass denial, don’t we?
 
 
+36 # Richard Spisak 2011-05-07 05:13
Either we are a nation of laws or we are not. EIther we support international law or we do not. You cannot pick and choose, "let's not look backward..." when it comes to the crimes for Bush, Cheney or Yoo... And Decide that silencing a complicit ally, Sadam, Osama, because if they did testify it would be "complicated.

A nation that occaissionally observes the rule of law, is a lawless nation. A nation that only enforces law, on the poor, that only enforces the rules that don't disadvantage the comfortable, is a lawless nation. Pvt. Manning suffers "ENHANCED Imprisonment" with no conviction, no trial and goes beyond the rule of law to punish an un-convicted man.
Yet, destroy evidence, kill, torture, make a policy of extra-judicial killing. These are not crimes that interest MIC (Military Industrial Complex)

When I watch my country revel in the extra-judicial murder, of a human being, it makes me sad, for how readily we turn away from law and civilized values.

Are we at war with Oceana or Eurasia, I should find Winston Smith and ask him if he remembers. (If he and we are allowed to remember.

solidarnosc
 
 
+17 # louis burner 2011-05-07 08:25
I agree completely with you. I don't know for certain what did happen on 911 and I don't know for certain what happened on May 1 (very well thought out dates), but there were/are too many inconsistencies and lack of proof; too many loopholes but everyone conveniently ignores this. I don't like what is happening today and I think that worse things are yet to come. All of this will prove to be used as an excuse to go in and take over the middle east. Really, what gives them the right?
 
 
+6 # Lestrad 2011-05-07 22:43
I definitely agree that Obama is using this (and by extension the deaths of all those innocent people) for political ends. When I saw he was going to lay a wreath at "Ground Zero" I was convinced.
You could argue that if it will get him re-elected to do good, then so be it. But what good has he done? He's continued playing the game. He's continued defending the empire at the cost of innocent lives and domestic deterioration. He's a good team player. So, okay, Boy - go ahead and spike the football.
 
 
+2 # khidr786 2011-05-08 03:54
thank You for Your uncommon common sense...
 
 
+24 # valerid 2011-05-06 22:56
Obama came in as a speaker of hope- forget about the law- it's just about blood and death- war everywhere, killing by drones, bombs, depleted uranium- Nobel peace prize- what a joke- this is such a travesty- I am so ashamed of the people who are running this country into the ground- a nation of sheep, ruled by wolves, run by pigs.
 
 
+6 # terre 2011-05-07 19:48
As opposed to bush/cheney invading a country that had nothing to do with 911
because the lie was hussein had WMDs?
Then bush states that bin laden isn't important and he doesn't think about him?


Quoting
Obama came in as a speaker of hope- forget about the law- it's just about blood and death- war everywhere, killing by drones, bombs, depleted uranium- Nobel peace prize- what a joke- this is such a travesty- I am so ashamed of the people who are running this country into the ground- a nation of sheep, ruled by wolves, run by pigs.
 
 
+17 # Imtiaz 2011-05-07 00:05
Just think of it, would you throw your hard earned prize into the sea with no traceable evidence after spending billions of dollars and going through death and destruction for almost a decade?!!

Until now, bin Laden’s name was being used by the US as an excuse to stay in Afghanistan. As the campaign was not going anywhere, an excuse was needed to show victory and to take the ‘victorious’ army out of the region.

Just as bin Laden’s life was necessary to keep going; his death is seen to be necessary to declare a victory and to move on the next goal. The real goal of course is never the topic of discussion, which is to hang around Central Asia and the Caspian Sea region for the upcoming new sources of oil and gas.

Similarly, the US never shared any proof that bin Laden was in fact the mastermind of 9/11 or was it Khalid Shiekh, who went through 150 sessions of waterboarding to own his part in 9/11! Who was behind 9/11 then – we do not know but we certainly know that the story told by the US government is full of holes, just like the pathetic story of bin Laden in Abbottabad.
 
 
+21 # rm 2011-05-07 06:16
Imtiaz writes, "Just think of it, would you throw your hard earned prize into the sea with no traceable evidence after spending billions of dollars"

Yes, this is the oddest part and no one is talking about it. It is more like destroying evidence. The right thing to do would have been to give the body to relatives, return it family. That is what the Geneva Conventions require for enemies killed in war when at all possible. You can also give it to a neutral organization like the Red Crescent or Red Cross. Ditching the body in the ocean was a war crime, in addition to being an action that will raise speculations forever that it was not bin Laden. But let's face it, the US military just does not want any more discussion of bin Laden. A trial would have been unthinkable. What evidence do they have that bin Laden was involved wiht 9-11. Zero. Absolutely nothing other than allegations from politicians who lie for a living. We are turning to a new phase in the "Long War" and we will need new poster boys and new propaganda campaigns. I suspect that the new phase will be the Arab Spring.
 
 
-5 # Texas Aggie 2011-05-07 09:04
This is an example of not being able to comprehend subtle, but important, differences. His body was not DITCHED in the ocean. It was treated the same as would occur with any Moslem burial at sea with the same religious observances. The videos make that clear.
 
 
+16 # rm 2011-05-07 06:38
Bin Laden was a casualty in a war. I would guess that there have been at least 5 million such casualties on the side of Muslim peoples spread across about a dozen nations. He wasn't the leader of anything big or important. His movement actually ended in the 90s. He was expelled from Saudi Arabia, Yeman, and finally Sudan in 1996. He went to Afghanistan because he had no other place to go. The Taliban did not like him. Bin Laden wrote open letters and made some audio/video tapes calling for revolt against the American presence in Muslim countries and he inspired some terrorist acts. But that's all. He was no mastermind of anything but his own writings.

The bin Laden most Americans think they know is a creature of our propaganda system. I don't believe he had anything to do with 9-11. All the cheering is just part of the propaganda, cheering for oneself -- USA, USA, USA. The war goes on just as it did before bin Laden's death. Nothing changes -- the US is still murdering people in poor nations who have darker skins. That's what Euro/Americans have done for 500 years. They murder people in order to steal their natural resources. That's what Euro/Americans do and always have done. They are plundering cultures. They loot and terrorize as a way of life.

The best on the settling of America is "Since Predator Came." Euro/Americans are predatory cultures.
 
 
+13 # sebouhian 2011-05-07 02:34
I was saddened too about the hilarity of crowds around the country, because for those who mourn there is no closure; and for those who, like me, respect the role of justice above the act of vengeance, regret that the assassination of Osama Ben Laden was ordered by the one man whose office represents the ideal of justice over such acts of vengeance. That violation of office sets a precedent for our Presidents and other leaders around the world while besmirching our honorable role in the Nuremberg Trials.
 
 
+22 # Activista 2011-05-07 03:07
I agree with Moore - it was premeditated execution/assassination - in front of his 12 year old daughter (13 children)- not very moral.
And dancing on the grave of anybody is SICK.
Also we forget who made Bin Ladin - who taught him how to terrorize/bomb Kabul market (CIA) and who made him freedom fighter (Reagan).
Bin Ladin (more likely his disciples) attacked USA because USA - Christian Fanatics -(FOREIGN) troops were in Saudi Arabia/Meca. What would Americans do if the shoe was on the other foot?
 
 
+11 # Ralph Averill 2011-05-07 05:08
Agreed! OBL/al Qaeda published their justification for 9/11, through al Jazeera, that was 1) the occupation of Saudi Arabia by US troops, and 2) US absolute support of Israel and subjugation of the Palestinians. There has not been a peep about those two items since. OBL was killed to keep it that way.
 
 
-26 # Yachtsman 2011-05-07 05:13
How did "Christian" fanatics get into this senario??? Oh, I forgot, Christians are fair game anytime we need to find someone to blame for the inhuman behavior of Muslims. What is a Christian "fanatic" anyway? -- Someone who knocks on your door to offer you a Bible? I shutter to think of it!!
 
 
+15 # propsguy 2011-05-07 08:18
sorry, but the "inhuman behavior of muslims" is payback for our domination of their countries to take their oil reserves without paying them. they want us out- let's get out! the only reason we stay and meddle is because we want their resources
 
 
+23 # Texas Aggie 2011-05-07 08:58
A "christian" fanatic is anyone who lets his particular dogma get in the way of human decency and well-being. It pretty much encompasses most of the right wing christianists.
 
 
+10 # Activista 2011-05-07 09:31
What is a Christian "fanatic" anyway?:
"he Centennial Institute conservative think tank at Colorado Christian University is hosting a "Tribute to the Troops" Monday, where the featured speakers will be Sarah Palin and General William "Jerry" Boykin. Although both figures in the past have been associated with an aggressive Christian politics known as Dominionism, Boykin is one of the people at the heart of post-9/11 US religious militarism."
 
 
+11 # Michael C 2011-05-08 09:54
A Christian fanatic: some examples -
Americans who bombed a gay bar in Atlanta
American who murdered people at an abortion clinic in Brookline
Americans who invent a fake history that America was founded as a Christian nation and that their book trumps the constitution
Africans who make homosexuality a crime punishable by death in Uganda
Americans who fund and advise the Ugandans to institute the death penalty for homosexuality
American Mormons who encourage young gay Mormons to commit suicide (see 8: The Mormon Proposition)
- Those are the first thoughts that come to mind.
 
 
+7 # Dave W. 2011-05-08 10:04
Yachtsman, I suggest, whilst you're "yachting" of course, that before your next cruise, you pick up and take along a copy of author Jeff Sharlett's book
"The Family." Pour yourself a glass of wine,properly chilled naturally, arrange your deck chair and read. In less time than it takes to update your stock portfolio the answer to your question, "what is a Christian fanatic anyway?" will come, if I may be so bold as to say, as in a "revelation." While you're at it you might consider catching up on some history of Western(Christi an) nations, and their activities. Start in 1492 and work forward.May the currents of truth and wisdom guide your journey.
 
 
0 # Lestrad 2011-05-12 05:41
The only Christian fanatic is one who says that Muslims (or all the members of any other religion) are inhuman.
 
 
+14 # GTrout 2011-05-07 08:00
We also forget who made Saddam Hussein and most of the other despots in the Middle East and elsewhere - yep, the CIA and Reagan again. They're our guys and all Mr. Wonderful until they get the big head, do something publicly stupid and make the news. Then they're an embarrassment and have to be taken out. Bin Laden was a bad man, but he was our bad man until he turned on us and had to be put down like any rabid dog. As others have said here, there's no way he could have been allowed to testify in open court. If defense were allowed to do due diligence on his background the results would make Wikileaks look like a comic book.

Oh, and the Christian fanatics comment isn't far off; check out these links on the Jesus scopes and the efforts to crowd out other religions from the military academies:

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/us-military-weapons-inscribed-secret-jesus-bible-codes/story?id=9575794

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4772331
 
 
-8 # glen 2011-05-07 04:00
I am, and will always be an admirer and supporter Of all of Mr. Moores' activism, he has enlightened us to many injustices that no one else was concerned with or too afraid to take on. On the subject of bin Laden tho', he has jumped the shark. I don't care how he was killed, it's still not good enough for me. I wish he had suffered much more like his victims did in the Twin Towers or on thos airplanes.
 
 
+9 # Glen 2011-05-07 06:03
Your comments are one of the problems in maintaining civilized discourse on this subject. Personally, I don't think it was bin Laden in that house, but if it was why not capture him. It would have been easy as has been shown, even by our own government reports. As has been reported in various threads on RSN, had bin Laden been captured citizens might have at least had the opportunity to see charges actually brought and proven. PROVEN.

Prior to Bush getting into office, as I have said, true terrorist criminals (not put up jobs) were hunted and either killed or captured. No country was attacked on the excuse of there being terrorists camping there. In this case, camping where the U.S. provided monies and munitions.

Consider how many ex-puppets of the U.S. have died or had their countries attacked. Saddam Hussein is a prime example, his sons executed in the same way as bin Laden. They had done nothing to the U.S. Very uncivilized, especially in the light of how many thousands and thousands of folks have died for the "sins" of bin Laden at the hands of the U.S.

Rejoicing in this recent event is, considering all the ongoing death is beyond the dignity of U.S. citizens.
 
 
+7 # propsguy 2011-05-07 08:21
i agree. i think they paid some poor guy to take a hit, promised to support his family forever. it was too staged, too pat, too convenient and oops! no body. i think someone needs a ratings boost and the justifiably angry americans needed to be distracted from the real issues
 
 
-5 # Texas Aggie 2011-05-07 08:50
al Qaeda seems to disagree with you. They are sure that it really was bin Laden who was killed, and have promised revenge. So who should I believe, a tin foil hat conspiracist or the people actually involved in the case?
 
 
0 # Lestrad 2011-05-12 05:45
"They are sure that it really was bin Laden who was killed, and have promised revenge." What tinfoil-hat conspiracist did you get that information from? Or is Al-Qaeda doing op-eds now? Let's see the source.
 
 
-5 # Texas Aggie 2011-05-07 08:56
al Qaeda seems to think that it was bin Laden who was killed. So much for your conspiracy.

But think about what would happen if he were taken alive. How many Westerners would be kidnapped to be held as exchange? How would he ever be given a fair trial considering how the wingnuts soiled their underwear over some minor terrorist being given a fair trial in NYC?

As you said, Prior to Bush ... true terrorist criminals ... were hunted and either killed or captured." This one was killed.
 
 
+4 # Dave W. 2011-05-08 10:15
Glen, Well spoken and presented comment. My one minor complaint: "considering all the ongoing death is beyond the dignity of U.S. citizens". I'm afraid we both know that "dignity" is an attribute a fair sized number of U.S. citizens have either abandoned or never possessed.
 
 
+13 # john mortl 2011-05-07 04:16
By killing Osama Ben Laden the US authorities have eliminated the one person that could have corroberated their version of 9/11. As itnow stands we are left with just another Conspiracy Theory.
 
 
+6 # fredboy 2011-05-07 05:18
It was either an ordered hit or the team, despite the fact that he was unarmed, was afraid that he might hurt them. Don't forget, they were facing the Bogeyman!
 
 
+12 # ritaague 2011-05-07 06:16
St. Michael deserves the Nobel Peace Prize, and a pres. I now call Oh Bomb Ah, deserves to have that prize rescinded. It was given upon his election in 2008, evidently as a way to prompt and encourage him to seek peace and justice (it hasn't worked). Hardly peace or justice to add to our crippling MSD (manipulation, spin, distraction). Ben Ladin was slaughtered in front of his family (his son also killed) without any impartial, international court establishing guilt.

We were MSD'd on weapons of mass destruction. What if we were MSD'd on Ben Ladin being the culprit? We've been given plenty of notice that the greed and power addicted villainaires will stop at nothing to keep their war, war, war for oil, oil, oil up and running. Only the dumbest of the dumb among us would fall for what could easily be more karlroving. No wonder the rest of the world holds us in such contempt.

As my Irish cousins say: "You Yanks have had a coup d'etat, and you're too naive to recognize it." Now that's a fact.
 
 
+5 # GUSSIE 2011-05-07 06:18
Bin Laden will be just as dangerous a dead martyr was one of the masterminds who may in fact have brought down the United States as we knew it before 9/11 for good. And this not so much for the destructive airplane missiles but for our reaction to those deaths. How costly have these wars been for the United States -- we'll know in ten or twenty years. Bin Laden understood the political psyche of our leaders well. He knew that we would find a hundred ways in our need to maintain the mask of being the most powerful nation in the world to turn most Arabs in the world against us and find ourselves without any truly involved and powerful allies sharing in our burden of revenge.
 
 
+16 # Texas Aggie 2011-05-07 08:46
To find the other masterminds who "brought down the United States as we knew it before 9/11" run a check on the members of the Bush Administration and on the signers of the PNAC documents.
 
 
+1 # fredboy 2011-05-07 06:33
They may have gotten the sea burial idea from the first Transformers movie. You'll recall they even used an aircraft carrier, just like the flick.
 
 
+8 # Texas Aggie 2011-05-07 08:44
For our system to work, people need to be given a fair trial before they are punished, and their punishment should be in accordance with the verdict. Granted there are problems with capturing someone like bin Laden and giving him a trial. Al Qaeda running a slew of kidnappings to be exchanged for bin Laden would be only one of them.

The solution to the problem would be to hold a series of in absentia trials for different people suspected of international terrorism. This type of trial has a precedent in the US, the murderer who fled to France, Einhorn (sp?), being just one. Then those who are convicted could be sought out and punished in accordance with the verdict of the jury.
 
 
+10 # Donald Conroy 2011-05-07 08:46
Moore's distinction between deception/lies and intentions that have not been accomplished, like closing Guantanimo, is very important. Moore is not a spin master like so many others. He seems to have a conscience and tries to act within his religious tradition.
 
 
+9 # lin96 2011-05-07 10:15
There is one issue that I think is relevent. On 911 it was reported that Bush Sr. was in New York and had met with a member of the Bin Laden family. President Bush stopped all flights in and out of the US, however, a flight was arranged to get the Bin Laden family out of the US. President Bush stopped looking for Bin Laden, he declined to be part of a ceremony at ground zero. Doesn't anyone see that this could be a conflict of interest if his family our friends with the Bin Laden's? Also, since Bin Laden had family, no one is mentioning his family's reaction. Would they have anything to say about how he was buried or how the body was dispossed of as next of kin? Michael Moore is right. Al Queda shows pictures of beheadings and murder. To show photos would be to stoop to their level.
 
 
-25 # Lee Coleman 2011-05-07 10:49
Moore's appearance on CNN, weeping crockadile tears and wringing his hands over the execution/extermination of bin Laden, was pathetic. I've agreed with Moore for years but this one is way too far beyond the pale for me to stomach. Moore has finally managed to discredit himself completely. Obama is our warrior president and I'm proud and happy that he reached out and touched bin Laden in the best way possible -- an act of war against the vile, filthy leader of the death cult known as al Qaida.
 
 
+12 # Adoregon 2011-05-07 12:44
Arrgh, mateys... dead men tell no tales.

If Osama was tried rather than executed, one can only imagine the tales he could have told.
 
 
-14 # cherylpetro 2011-05-07 15:13
You are making judgments on a situation you did not participate in, plus you have facts wrong! You have lost a LOT of credibility with me, Mr Moore! You sound like you have lost it, and are having a late mid-life crisis! Get real, and stop blaming people who should not be blamed! You sound more sympathetic to Bin Laden! He is a MASS MURDERER! If he had gone to prison, would you have wanted to be his friend? What is going on with you? Just get a job with FOX and be done with it!
 
 
+11 # futhark 2011-05-07 16:01
Barack "Drone Attack" O'Bomber has once again demon-strated his unwavering allegiance to the plutocratic military-industrial oligarchy that calls the political shots in this country. Imperialism and militarism have once again emerged triumphant.

If you want to check out what a really loser political strategy looks like, find the 1900 Democratic Party Platform. Something like half the text is explicitly devoted to opposition to post Spanish-American War imperialism. Imperialist Republican William McKinley, with unapologeticall y arch-imperialist Theodore Roosevelt as running mate, trounced Democrat William Jennings Bryan 51.6% to 45.5% in the popular vote.

The glorification of all things military keeps certain industries humming, certain politicians in office, and makes Americans feel good about themselves.

So "justice has been served", ... just like it was in 1963 when Jack Ruby shot Lee Harvey Oswald and set to rest any doubts about who killed President Kennedy and how it was done.
 
 
+2 # Dave W. 2011-05-08 10:23
futhark, You pretty much called it concerning "O'Bomber." You're reference to McKinley/T.Roosevelt/Bryan was interesting. Through in Taft and you'd have quite a foursome. If you haven't already, read James Bradford's "The Imperial Cruise." Believe me, when you're through you'll want to go and lob a few rocks at Mt.Rushmore.
 
 
+4 # wfalco 2011-05-07 17:17
The bottom line is the man who was admittedly responsible for numerous terrorist acts was killed. Isn't this better than the policy we have endured for the past 10 years?-Endless wars (one of which was strictly diversionary and meaningless, with the exception of all those innocents who were slaughtered.Certainly wasn't meaningless for their survivors.

This shows what should have been- a "special ops" operation committed by our trained assassins against the Al Quada trained assassins. I do not believe Obama and his "ops" people are finished. Expect further actions against the "second" and "third" in the command structure of Al Quada.
This is going to be proof to the world of what appropriate action should have been after 9/11/2001. Not the millions dead and billions of dollars wasted.
 
 
+3 # Dave W. 2011-05-08 10:32
wfalco, We both know Bin Laden's death WILL NOT stop the wars. I used to drive an old bomber back in the seventies that had a bad oil leak. Used to pour in 40 wt. "sludge" to slow it down. That's about how long it will be before we leave Middle East. A "40 YEAR" wait. My leak got so bad I junked the car. Once the oil has all "leaked" from the Middle East we'll junk that too.
 
 
+2 # wfalco 2011-05-09 05:14
Perhaps you are right, Dave W. But, Obama did not get us into either Iraq or Afghanistan.He was left this mess of wars and financial ruin. My point is that we,unfortunatel y, reside in a country of cowboys. People may extol liberal values as some polls indicate(but this is only when those polled perceive a particular program as helping them-not "those other people.")-Thus...my point continued...it is a center-right country philosophically -which is more important than what polls show regarding what people want domestically.
Obama had no choice in these recent events-he had to prove his manhood and xenophobic patriotism to the yahoos(who are not just Tea Party members)but average Joe blue collar/lower white collar worker. They think through their guts and emotions.My hope is that these recent turn of events will help expedite withdrawal as we can actually point to a "success story." Why not use this as "'victory" and get the hell out?
 
 
+3 # Dave W. 2011-05-09 08:54
wfalco, You certainly have my "get the hell out" endorsement. I don't believe the "success story" of a dead Bin Laden will do much to alleviate the voracious appetite of a MIC that is out of control. Perhaps you're correct that the "recent turn of events" will convince the "guts and emotions" thinkers to reassess the lunacy of watching our ship of state sink whilst still firing our cannons.
 
 
+14 # fbelcast 2011-05-07 18:39
How many of us know that Osama bin Laden’s role in the events of September 11, 2001 is not mentioned on the FBI’s “Ten Most Wanted notice (http://www/fbi.gov/wanted.htm). In 2006, Rex Tomb, chief of investigative publicity for the FBI explains, “The reason 9/11 is not mentioned on Osama bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11. . . . He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 . . . . .”

The Ithaca Journal asks, “If the U.S. government does not have enough hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11, how is it possible that it had enough evidence to invade Afghanistan?” Indeed.
 
 
-1 # d hart 2011-05-11 06:05
Michael Moore does not know everything
Bin Laden died in 2001, he had kidney
disease.
But, someone made this story up and that
is what it is, that he was assassinated.
So how does anyone find out or believe
anything anymore because they all lie.
 
 
0 # Tango South Africa 2011-05-12 14:31
I'm South Africa. when i saw Michael on CNN i immediately tought "he's gone to the other side" - otherwise wouldn't we be watching him on Infowars with alex Jones?
unfortunately i believe the otherside has gotten hold of your Presindent too.
when he was running for election we all had high hopes for him... not just you Americans. we, too, believed he was a hero - a Nelson Mandela. he has been very dissapointing but i believe it's because he has a beutiful family... and the otherside uses this to keep him in line. sorry guys... we were really hoping he was your hero.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.