Email This Page
add comment
read more of todays top articles

Intro: "We need to rebuild the kind of mass movement that marked 1970: bodies, passion, and creativity are the currencies we can compete in. It's not impossible."

Peter Hallerman, a college student in New York City, reflected both the gravity and zaniness of the first Earth Day protest, 04/09/70. (photo: AP)
Peter Hallerman, a college student in New York City, reflected both the gravity and zaniness of the first Earth Day protest, 04/09/70. (photo: AP)

go to original article

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+17 # Mary Wentworth 2011-04-09 08:19
Klein and McKibben have left out one extremely important point: Every revolutionary movement in the world except here recognizes that you need a political party to solidify any gains that are made. Since we have a winner-take-all in our elections, we have two-party system. The party we have that could be our vehicle is the Democratic party. We need to take it back! This party already has an enormous base, has a history of being for the ordinary American, and has a structure that allows us to effectively take it over.

A movement is not enough as Klein and McKibben have demonstrated in their article.
 
 
-27 # in deo veritas 2011-04-09 12:02
The only way we can get the Demo party back is to get rid of George Soros. Put the bastard who collaborated with the Nazis in prison. He confessed to this on Larry King's show.
 
 
-21 # in deo veritas 2011-04-09 14:30
As long as Soros is involved in the Democratic party his role is the same as that of the Koches for the Republicans and that gives no moral ground to use against them. Six of one and hald dozen of the other.
 
 
+17 # Activista 2011-04-09 14:56
in deo? veritas brainwashed by - Glenn Beck On George Soros & Obama- "Put the bastard who collaborated with the Nazis in prison" ?
Soros was protected - when nazism/war ended he was 14 - at 16 he left for London ... great immigrant story -
 
 
+17 # sark 2011-04-09 15:37
Soros, the man that funds organizations working for social, economic and environmental justice, I vote to keep him.
For those that like to have the whole story and not just a snippet pulled to try and undermine Soros, I would recommend the following links as well as going to PBS and searching NOW archive for the Soros interview.

http://veracitystew.com/2011/02/22/reality-check-why-george-soros-is-no-koch-brother-pic/

http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2010/09/opensecrets-battle---koch-brothers.html

Peace
 
 
+12 # Activista 2011-04-09 18:10
After CCCP bankrupted (military spending)
George Soros paid ex-Soviet nuclear scientists to stay home and do NOT sell their services to terrorists.
World could look very different without this man right now.
Soros is funding protection of Gypsies/Romes in Eastern Europe very racist society - great man.
 
 
+30 # Christine 2011-04-09 08:22
All Progressive Groups First Need to Focus on Ending Corporate Influence
All organizations working on societal and environmental problems need to get briefly on the same page. A single focus of dollars and energy spent on ending corporate influence would greatly diminish the problems various organizations are fighting. We need to call on MoveOn to get the word out to their members to call for all groups from the Sierra Club to the Small Business Alliance to focus energy and dollars on this one issue...END CORPORATE INFLUENCE ONCE AND FOR ALL!. We are too diffuse in our efforts. "THEY" are winning. Wake up! Fix the roof (eliminate corporate influence) quit running around putting buckets under leaks (issues)!
If interested in working on this as a solution please reply.
 
 
+12 # Rena Grasso 2011-04-09 09:18
Absolutely. Without cohering all the fragmented progressive effort, we are all exhausting ourselves.
I have tried to contact Move.On simply to get their assistance in helping me to pull together move-on groups in MA. They were unresponsive despite my several attmepts. I also think that our focused action( should we manage to create that organization) need to be very strategically planned to resonate onb many levels and to be parwt of a long term vision. Finally, it seems to me that the single most important thing we should be focusing on is building an organization to impact on the next election.
 
 
+6 # Mary Miller 2011-04-09 12:23
What I don't understand, I have tried for the last year to get green people UNITED into one single group, without success. Why? I just don't get it! We need a SINGLE focus, getting our needs met by ONE party not each agenda. As long as we are singular in our affects; (solar fighting non solar, Monsanto fighters fighting GMO seeds) our power is divided and weakened. If we harness the power of each groups passions (solar, recycyling, non gmo, clean oceans, non off shore drilling, sustainable living) we actually HAVE a strong base ALREADY.
 
 
+16 # shelteringwing 2011-04-09 09:31
Union Union Union Union. Coalesce, Prioritize. Get a job done. Succeed with one big idea and move on. I think Bitartsy is right. Citizens United (orwellian lie) is killing the ability to break through. It must be repealed.
 
 
+12 # tomb215 2011-04-09 10:03
Well Bitartsy, what group do you sponsor/support that is making this effort? Do you really think we are able to control what the industrial, medical, military and financial institutions have built their enities into today? Here’s a comment made by someone who was associated with the American's Banker Association in 1927, over eight decades ago, *** "Capital must protect itself in every possible way, both by combination and legislation. Debts must be collected, mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible. When, through the process of law, the common people lose their homes, they will become more docile and more easily governed through the strong arm of government applied by a central power of wealth under leading financiers. These truths are well known among our principal men who are now engaged in forming an imperialism to govern the world. By dividing the voter through the political party system, we can get them to expend their energies in fighting for questions of no importance. It is thus by discreet action we can secure for ourselves that which has been so well planned and so successfully accomplished."
 
 
+6 # in deo veritas 2011-04-09 12:22
And the same kind of greedy bastards are doing it again. Their rendezvous with justice will come not in the courts but at the hands of the people they have ruined. The government will have to lead, follow, or get the hell out of the way. So far all it has done is follow the dictates of traitors like the one you described. It is small consolation that none of them will make it to heaven. They are too stupid to realize this or even care.
 
 
0 # racetoinfinity 2011-04-10 22:31
The corporate plutocratic reactionaries are well aware that they are turning back the clock - they've been waiting since at least 1933. These fanatics (like Paul Ryan) want to turn it back to 1890, as far as deregulating business, decimating labor, and letting the robber-baron rich rule again.
 
 
0 # racetoinfinity 2011-04-10 22:28
The National Initiative for Democracy - http://ni4d.us/
 
 
+14 # sark 2011-04-09 08:45
I think we would have a lot better chance if we voted using paper ballots with a hand count. As long as we vote using machines manufactured, programmed and serviced by hard-right Republican supporting corporations with an agenda, corporate powers will be able to maintain the balance of power in their favor. We can march, protest, write and call but the action that will move us forward is having real election integrity and that can only come about if we demand that the voting machines go, please!
 
 
+9 # Activista 2011-04-09 10:22
I work with computers and do NOT fear machines - it is possible for programmer to bias the machine - but also easy to discover the bug.
In Florida 2000 technocrats and then Bush PAPA's supreme court biased elections to BABY Bush.
We need informed electorate - media NOT propaganda.
 
 
+4 # sark 2011-04-09 16:44
Activista, I'd like to recommend that you search for information concerning voting machines hacked without leaving a trace. Here is one place to start but I think it is better if you search and look at what you find.
http://www.technologyreview.com/Infotech/17508/?a=f
I'd also recommend Election Defense Alliance as an election integrity resource.
Having worked with a security expert professional hacker on election integrity issues, I have seen it demonstrated/explained when we did the 51capital demonstration/march. I don't fear machines but I also do not trust electronic voting machines manufactured, programmed and serviced by hard-right Republican supporting corporations with an agenda. I would not even trust the machines if they were demonstrated to work just fine because I know that they can always be reprogrammed.
Peace
 
 
+2 # CTPatriot 2011-04-09 23:19
Baloney. I spent 14 years as a software programmer and I don't fear machines either. But I DO know how easily they can be covertly manipulated, and I've spent enough time studying the flaws in today's computerized voting systems to know that your blind trust in them is entirely misplaced.

For anyone wishing to learn more about these flaws, please take a gander at www.bradblog.com and www.blackboxvoting.org.
 
 
0 # sark 2011-04-10 18:20
Thank You! Bradblog is a favorite of mine. I think that is how I found Mark Crispin Miller. Again, thank you for you post.
 
 
+13 # frank 2011-04-09 09:00
The same people (including BIG Business and the Koch Brothers) who are trying to crush environmental programs and regulations are also trying to cut education, social programs and many others, plus crush unions and other usually liberal causes.
Someone needs to unite the political arms of all liberal groups. At least a BIG UMBRELLA coordinating committee. There are far too many environmental and other liberal organizations to have much impact individually with their splintered efforts, individual messages, multiple bureaucracies, competitiveness and many other inefficiencies. Liberals need to take lessons from the handlers of the Tea Party, and in previous political cycles, the Evangelicals. (Tea Party organizers did a lot of research to find the most exploitable people and attitudes of the time.)
We need to unite with labor, political, and even “good corporations” to make a change. There is far more strength in unity.
 
 
0 # racetoinfinity 2011-04-10 22:33
You're right. I don't know why the Green party, which encompasses almost all of this, has never caught fire among progressives. ?
 
 
+6 # economagic 2011-04-09 09:23
The points about closer collaboration among the fragmented leftist organizations, if not actual unification (dream on!) are well taken. It is very difficult to deal rationally and constructively with daily solicitations from 10-20 groups all doing significant work, some overlapping, some partly at odds with each other, all focused on their little piece of the elephant.

The smart people I talk with -- from heterodox economists (Yes, Virginia, . . .) to thoughtful and informed people from many walks of life -- are increasingly of a mind that one or another of the dozen or more related but distinct crises facing the planetary system will break suddenly, within perhaps 5 years at the outside. When that occurs, collapse in all of the other over-stressed areas will follow rapidly.

We focus on development of local infrastructure, and the communities to utilize it, for food, water, shelter, communication, and other necessities.

One could consider electoral politics, in the U.S. and elsewhere, to be the sub-system that has already failed, and that will soon precipitate major failures elsewhere.
 
 
+4 # in deo veritas 2011-04-09 13:01
Let's stop this leftist b.s. regardless of the source. Call it what it is-antifascism! Capitalism in its last stage becomes fascism of the type Mussolini attempted to create- a corporate state and that's where we are on the brink of.
 
 
0 # genierae 2011-04-11 05:54
I agree, economagic, working in our communities in support of the common good is the best way to overturn corporate dominance. We have a much louder voice in our towns than we do on a national level, and much more control of who gets elected to local office. Each community could be a cooperative, with everyone working together for the good of the whole. If this became a nationwide movement we would have real clout. We could take back our country one community at a time.
 
 
+9 # Activista 2011-04-09 09:27
McKibbibben (Age of Missing Information) - with Klein - are very bright and INFORMED people. Hope for USA and World.
We have the leaders - let's unite behind them let's make the revolution.
We have Internet - where is a MANIFESTO?
STOP military and WARS, make CIVIL SOCIETY (Soros), save the environment/earth.
Egypt students can fight generals -
US students can do better. We saw it in Wisconsin - JUST DO IT.
 
 
-11 # in deo veritas 2011-04-09 13:04
Nothing good can happen unless Soros is gone. FYI he is a self-confessed collaborator with the Nazis in Hungary in WWII. He admitted this on the Larry King show. Therefore he is a fascist and every bit as rotten than the other Wall Street criminals.
 
 
+8 # sark 2011-04-09 18:24
If you are going to keep on posting this about Soros, how about being complete with your information and tell the whole story. I think I am in agreement with you about fascism in that I think that is where the US corporate state is headed. I am not asking that you like the man but if you are going to attack him, please do so in a fair and just way. I continue to stand by my previous response to your earlier anti Soros post.
 
 
+1 # in deo veritas 2011-04-09 13:11
Faux News tells us an asteroid encounter will happen in November! Instead of it being the end of life as we know it if it hit, it could very well be a way out of this downward spiral into hell that we are a part of. Maybe it would hit Wall Street! Would that be a sign from God or what? If we the sheeple don't have what it takes to get government to lead (which it isn't), follow (somebody other than the teabaggers and banksters), then what is the alternative?
 
 
+4 # Activista 2011-04-09 18:42
Faux News tells us:
Beck forwarded Malaysian official's anti-Semitic smear of Soros. On the October 5 edition of his Fox News show, Beck stated that "many, including the Malaysian prime minister, believe it was billionaire speculator George Soros who helped trigger ...
 
 
+5 # fredboy 2011-04-09 09:44
Naomi and Bill,

I so appreciate your intent, but fear the absence of backbones and other essentials--so many these days appear to have been gelded--spell the opposite outcome. American courage is shallow at best, most often displayed in the arrogat, faux macho swagger we see among the tailgaters and haters but almost never when confronted by workplace and governmental bullying.

Some studies have questioned why slaves so often submitted for several hundred years. There were occasional uprisings, but most accepted the dominance. Today we need more Nat Turners, more souls willing to stand up, to leave foul corporate enslavement, and to speak out.

Unless, of course, one enjoys the sense of "poor me" roll-over-and-take-it martyrdom they envision. That, my friends, is but a myth: you are just too lazy, frightened, and dependent to leave or argue with your masters. Admit it and shut up, or stand up and do something about it.
 
 
+7 # carolina599 2011-04-09 09:53
God...I love you Naomi Klein
 
 
+8 # m 2011-04-09 13:24
LET'S CALL IT WHAT IT REALLY IS:

Its an attempted 'Legalized' Secession now underway and driving forward towards a National Coup d'etat by the extreme Ideological Fringe with the help of Conservative Global Corporate Media and financing from Global Corporations.
They effort to 'secede' group by ideological group, first by District, then by State, then by seeking Federal Dominion over the entire country and the hundreds of millions of AMERICANS these people openly despise.
Their process is by way of 'Legal' Economic, Financial, De-Regulatory, De-Taxation and Budgetary Warfare.
Their agenda is to dismiss hundreds of millions of Americans as somehow 'unworthy'.. 'inferior'.. 'un-American'.., etc.., or just as out right 'Wastes-of-Space' they want nothing to do with as they seek control of everything in an America free of Corporate Regulation and Taxation and any kind of Government Funded Social Access to Anything which benefits ALL, including any kind of EPA, FDA, Social Security, Medicare, Universal Basic Education. You name it.
They seek Government by Corporate Contract, where Corporations Contract to perform ALL Government functions.
This is 'CLASS Warfare' being waged in earnest with EVERYTHING on the line.
Its the Corporate sponsored fringe TEA-PLE CLASS + the 2% Wealthy Global Corporate Class Vs. ALL OTHER AMERICANS.
 
 
+3 # in deo veritas 2011-04-09 14:33
Great post. Everything you have descibed comes down to one word-fascism.
 
 
0 # racetoinfinity 2011-04-10 22:36
I agree.
 
 
+5 # Realist 2011-04-09 16:15
To regain the election process, we must remove the need for excessive amounts of money. I have been proposing the following for some time, but no-one seems to respond to it. it is one way to reclaim our elections:
All television and radio stations and networks must give an equal amount of time to all candidates. If one candidate buys any additional time, the television and radio stations and networks selling that time must donate an equal amount of time to all the other candidates. This will be done on an area or national basis, depending on each initial purchase. If a station or network gives free coverage to any candidate, through interviews, talk shows, etc., that station must give all other candidates an equal amount of time. All equal time provisions are interpreted to mean at equivalent time slots.
Remember, the airwaves are owned by the people, and licensed to various networks. If these networks or individual stations do not agree to this public service (as required by FCC licensing agreements), they must lose their license(s).
 
 
0 # Robert Uttaro 2011-04-10 10:56
I'm reading this a day late so I don't know if anyone is still reading these comments especially this far down. Anyways, although most everyone is right as to uniting to combat the corporatocracy/plutocracy that owns our government, the solution is in what you say. We own the airwaves; not business. We need to get control of our elections and not just the media "rules" during elections. In fact, as the law now stands, we can't get there from here. To get to the remedy you propose, we need to have a Constitutional amendment that makes all public campaigns publicly funded. As the people, we have the right to put anything into the Constitution that does not violate the Bill of Rights and I would argue that demanding public financing of all public elections does just the opposite: it ensures the enshrinement of the Bill of Rights. How to do that? This is where liberals and progressives need to organize and elect members to the Congress who pledge to introduce and support the Amendment. One way to help accomplish that, might be to introduce referendums on state ballots that express the will of the people. Or we could demand convening a Constitutional Convention (never tried). Sure it won't be easy, but until we get money out of politics, Citizens United will leave us as neither citizens nor united. And the path we are on has a catastrophic outcome.
 
 
0 # racetoinfinity 2011-04-10 22:40
Unfortunately, this will take an amendment to the Constitution, the only way (correct me if I'm wrong) to undo The Supreme Court's corporatist "Citizens United" decision.
 
 
+2 # racejim 2011-04-09 18:36
Bipartsy's end the corporate rule is where we need to unite first and foremost. The "We Are One" banner says it all,& if we all start there and make corporations subordinate to we the people, start to rebuild the middle class,with a job that pays enough to raise a family .The politicians are elected with corporate funds,& Citizens United gave corporations cover and unlimited use of their wealth .The largest banks are 20% bigger now then before we bailed them out .The 1927 comment is so true today ,as they foreclose on millions of American's .Last week 60 minutes aired a piece on how the foreclosure documents are all fraudulent and they do not have standing to foreclose .The Mortgage Backed Security lacks the mortgage .They did not record the transfer of the note required by law, 1 to prove wnership,and 2 to stiff every county in the country the fee's, saving banks billions .Our individual issue ,global warming,ending the wars,gay rights are all important , but first we need to end corporate rule .We need to come out in huge numbers supporting each other and demanding the taxes these huge company's do not pay,in GE's case they received a 2 billion tax refund .This solidarity requires people power replacing corporate power,we are 98% of power. Under We Are One its time to storm the Capital,& move in like Wisconsin & keep the lobbyist out .The military & police are on our side!
 
 
+2 # Activista 2011-04-09 18:36
Sark - thank you for references - YES the present system is very primitive and flawed - main issue is that it does not provide any feedback to the voter/receipt.
In age of networking each vote should be recorded 2x - in the network age. And the machines should be independent SW/HW. and then reconciled.
Most of the vote fraud is political scheming - usually by "ruling class". The biggest issue are brainwashed masses. And they are being brainwashed more and more - NPR not being founded, limitless corporate money in elections/propaganda (supreme court decisions).
I would agree just opposite - after 2000 Florida fraud/recount - how it was manipulated and then stopped be supreme court.
Many errors - like voting 2x can machine catch and ask for correction - vote is NOT rejected.
It would be nice to have a Google search and be able to search right there for the answers not on the voter pamphlet. Voting record, etc.
 
 
+1 # sark 2011-04-10 04:55
Activista, sure the vote should be recorded 2x but even then, how can you be certain the vote is recorded as cast. You can't. There is a major difference between recording the vote and counting the vote. There is no way to know that any feedback provided to the voter will be the reality of how the vote is counted.
You have excellent points about voter fraud and I also work on all of those issues as well as how the polls are gamed. I would like the answers on pamphlets and truth also, because most will never do a Google search. That is what they are hoping for in the design. I agree about all the problems with voter and voter education fraud but think we must first have the foundation of our votes really being counted as cast for real positive change to happen. I still get a sick feeling thinking about 2000 and what the court did stopping the count that in the end showed Gore winning. However, there has been testimony and demonstrations over and over showing problems with the Florida voting machines.
I think that until we have hand counted paper ballots, those that count the vote laugh at all our efforts if they even think of us at all.
 
 
0 # Activista 2011-04-10 09:56
We need informed voter - not brainwashed herd by FOX. Then transparent voting process - as objective as possible.
The issue in Florida were rejected ballots - voted 2x ?, did not punch 100% - all being challenged.
Well programmed computer should eliminate all above - plus add additional checks.
Would always question military vote overseas - military should be apolitical.
Would question "organized" vote in churches, retirement homes. Dead people receiving ballots - Mrtve duše, roman Nikolaja Vasiljeviča Gogolja
 
 
+1 # sark 2011-04-10 17:01
The machines are well programmed,as I have said before, by hard-right Republican supporting corporations with an agenda. You keep gong back to Florida in 2000. There is also Ohio in 2000. What about Florida, Ohio and other states in 2002, 04, 06, 08 and 10? For me the continued reference to Florida in 2000 (but not beyond) is like smoke and mirrors to keep the voters from getting to the very real problem of the voting machines. Also, getting rid of electronic voting machines does not take anything away from the need for informed voters, it just greatly increases the probability that their votes will be counted as cast and intended.
I see FOX propaganda as toxic and wish we had a law like Canada's that would stop some of their "brainwashing".
 
 
+1 # sark 2011-04-10 19:01
Apologies for the typos above, it has been a long day/week.
 
 
0 # Activista 2011-04-10 20:28
Let's close it - I see more chances for transparent voting using machines - than traditional paper ballots using boxes - basic programming eliminates invalid ballots.
It is so easy to validate (checksum) that the vote was NOT tampered.
There are lot of conspiracy theories - that the machine was reprogrammed. So far no proof - and with parties changing hands in 2008 - it would be hit.
Machines - as they are now are primitive - with no feedback/ticket to the voter - it is black box - not to be trusted/no user feedback. The firm that designed them should not get a penny for this junk and sent to prison for extortion.
Government contracted software is so primitive - waste of money - NOT USABLE. Also black box - money drain -nobody is responsible.
 
 
+1 # sark 2011-04-11 04:30
Interesting, I wondered when you'd throw out "conspiracy theories". Since you like FL so much, there has been a lot of testimony about the machines there. And, if you want to hold on to the "no proof", exactly! The machines can be compromised and it never discovered. Based on research by computer scientist and experts and actual happenings in elections, I disagree with your position about the use of voting machines. Transparent means little to nothing when it comes to the machines. It has been proven that the machines can be compromised and leave no trace. It is in no way easy to prove that the vote was NOT tampered with unless you have a hand count of paper ballots. Running ballots back thought the same machines that did the count in the first place does nothing to assure that the vote is counted as cast. Feedback/ticket to the voter does nothing to assure the vote is counted as cast. If the voters were honestly educated about the truths of voting machines at all points in the election system, then they would demand that the machines go. The way you want to close it assures that those that count the vote will always have the power and ability to determine election outcomes.
 
 
+3 # Activista 2011-04-09 19:21
McKibben/Klein: "any chance requires people power (power of powerless) replacing corporate power. In the year of Tunisia and Egypt and Wisconsin, it's worth a try."
Let's do IT - there is no other option NOW.
 
 
+1 # lkach 2011-04-11 14:07
"Koch Brothers spend huge sums" is the reality-based observation here. In the early 1970's this and Rupert Murdoch's form of money in politics were both illegal. This changed in 1976 when the Supreme Court alchemists turned democracy-corroding money into constitutionall y protected speech. Going back to demonstrations and techniques that worked before 1976 is to miss the point that everything changed in 1976. We have to unite to get money out of politics before any other democratic political strategies can succeed. Here two of our best describers of our predicament fail to propose a viable solution, and thereby perform a disservice.
Something far more contemporary and strategic is required http://moneyouttapolitics.org/
 
 
+2 # jon 2011-04-11 16:51
The fairness in broadcasting act's demise at the hands of Reagan put the nation's media in the hand's of the corporatists - most notably, Rupert Murdoch.

The result has been a major portion of our population voting against their own interests. How those people are so easily propagandized should be the cause of a major study.

The Internet alone, is not going to counter the weight of TV and AM radio. If a means of leveling this playing field can be found, the final positive result would be greatly enhanced.

This is where the revolution must start.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.