Email This Page
add comment
read more of todays top articles

Tim Rutten says of Glenn Beck: "The Fox News personality is strangely bent on linking the president - and race - to liberation theology, evidence to the contrary be damned."

Reciting the national anthem at Glen Becks's honor restoration rally in Washington, 08/28/10. (photo: Getty Images)
Reciting the national anthem at Glen Becks's honor restoration rally in Washington, 08/28/10. (photo: Getty Images)

 

Comments  

 
+21 # Guest 2010-09-03 21:36
Poor America. It has more than its share of nuts like Glen Beck. God indeed needs to take care of America. The Republicans can't and they won't let Obama do it either.
 
 
+10 # Guest 2010-09-04 08:09
I am not sure 'nut' is the right word for Beck. How much is an act and how much does he believe in the perverted history and theology he's churning out and getting rich from. What's the difference between doing it as entertainment where his audience knows it a joke and doing it like a TV evangelist or professional wrestler? He makes more money this way and gets to be his bad boy self while doing it. He gets both those audiences plus those whose patriotism is limited to symbols and mottoes. How hard is it to convince people that its evil to help others but righteous to take what you can get by hook or crook? What Beck is exploiting is the dark side of human nature. Christ understood this and how hard it was to convince people of the opposite. In every time, there is this same tension for the soul of a tribe or nation or an individual. Our division is an ancient one and it's not about left and right. It's about ethics and morality. Our charismatic leader has been eclipsed. Will he emerge in time?
 
 
+26 # Guest 2010-09-03 22:01
You might have mentioned the priests who advocated liberation theology and were then excommunicated due to the actions of the present pope. People like Dom Helder come to mind ("When I give food to the poor, people call me a saint. When I ask why the poor have no food, people call me a Marxist.")
 
 
+6 # Guest 2010-09-04 08:36
I think you will find that observation well expressed in The Age of Reason by Thomas Paine. For Beck, an inconvenient book, as he misappropriates Common Sense.
 
 
+15 # Guest 2010-09-03 22:49
Demagogues frequently have a certain amount of truth in their rants. I believe there is an oppressor-victim theme in history. Frantz Fanon's book WRETCHED OF THE EARTH, described it well. Howard Zinn in A PEOPLE'S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES is only one source for the a clear picture of our genocide of Native Americans and our enslavement of blacks.

How on earth anyone connects that to Barack Obama is anyone's guess?
 
 
-8 # andresorges1960s 2010-09-05 11:16
Indeed, B Obama has nothing to do with these books except that when he was a college student (and to the present day) many professors railroad these books into reading lists. If you are raised on Fanon and Zinn, your worldview will be shaped in a certain way and you will be viewing the entire world through the victim-oppressor prism. This is my guess. Unfortunately, I still do not know what college courses Obama took and what papers he wrote while in college. Do you?
How about two more books to supplement your Fanon/Zinn perspective: Thomas Sowell's BLACK RED NECKS AND WHITE LIBERALS and Friedrich Hayek, ROAD TO SERFDOM?
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-09-05 12:35
Quoting
Indeed, B Obama has nothing to do with these books except that when he was a college student (and to the present day) many professors railroad these books into reading lists. If you are raised on Fanon and Zinn, your worldview will be shaped in a certain way and you will be viewing the entire world through the victim-oppressor prism. This is my guess. Unfortunately, I still do not know what college courses Obama took and what papers he wrote while in college. Do you?
How about two more books to supplement your Fanon/Zinn perspective: Thomas Sowell's BLACK RED NECKS AND WHITE LIBERALS and Friedrich Hayek, ROAD TO SERFDOM?


You do realize, don't you, that many responsible academics pride themselves in being extremely well acquainted with the many sides of an issue and numerous world views? Do you really think that Obama or any scholar would base his or her thinking solely on one school of thought? A single range of inquiry? As for Sowell...pullleeezz.
 
 
-1 # andresorges1960s 2010-09-07 11:49
You do realize, don't you, that many responsible academics pride themselves in being extremely well acquainted with the many sides of an issue and numerous world views?

I do realize this, and that is why I assign in my classes both Marx's Comm. Manisfesto and Hayek's Road to Serfdom. Let them decide on their own. Unfortunately, this is not a case with the majority of academics who have been clearly leaning toward the "Left" perspective. This is, as you said on another occasion, an "imminent FACT," empowered by aged tenured adminsitrators who were saturated with Fanon/Zinn-like ideas. Why and how it happened is another issue, which we have no room to cover here. Obama learned from these people. Remember President himself admitted in his Dreams of My Father: "I chose my friends carefully... Marxists professors, radical feminiists." Yet, I have to give him credit. Trying not to polarize the country, he did attempt to dissociate himself from this religious ganster named Rev Wright.
 
 
+35 # Guest 2010-09-03 23:45
What I would like to know is when did philosophical discourse become so unChristian as to become ammunition for damnation? These days one has to defend one's patriotism, religious beliefs, sexual preference, and genetic origins. If they don't stack up against a particular form of Christianity, one is immediately and harshly labeled as the enemy. Is this the America our ancestors fought to found and maintain? Is this the future we want for our children?
 
 
+10 # Guest 2010-09-04 00:36
Excellent article Tim. Glenn Beck rides a theory of rationality that can't demonstrate itself as being true. He attempts to pile on a series of random and isolated items to connect the dots that he believes justify his theories. The only problem is that he's applying inductive reasoning to try and prove his nonsense. Why is it that nobody asks him to demonstrate the truth of his claims? Induction never proves a theory. However deductive reasoning can disprove one assuming that the premises are true. Ahhh so many mysteries surrounding our first black president. No coincidence there. Nope. None at all.
 
 
+22 # Guest 2010-09-04 00:46
Oh when will this stupid as a door knob dolt shut up? Sure, I find him annoying to the nth, but worse...that so many lap his pablum up like it actually amounted to anything! And why, oh why, does he so own the media eye? His comments and ridiculous posturing somehow rises to the level of news. In what universe could he ever pass for newsworthy? Oh yeah, right. The good old USA. Makes ya' proud don't it?
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-09-04 08:33
He will probably never shut up, but when no one will pay him to pollute the broadcast media and he must resort to vanity publishing to get into print, he will be much easier to ignore.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-09-04 09:32
He is not a dolt. He is much worse than that. However, he is fallible, he can miscalculate and blunder on the terms of the game he and the others are playing. Most glaring example is his "Obama is a racist" move that backfired on him. This new thing is just an attempt to re-attack to divert attention from that error and get back to business as usual with his sponsors. There was never a problem with his audience, they agreed with him for the most part.
 
 
+19 # Guest 2010-09-04 05:28
I'm guessing that beck just recently heard of liberation theology, and he's the sort of bully that grabs up any likely-looking tool to use as a club.
 
 
+6 # Guest 2010-09-04 08:51
Beck was raised Catholic and would have heard of liberation theology long ago.

Helping others is evil. Greed is good. Vice is virtue. Virtue is vice. Humans have both inclinations...but all want to think of themselves as 'righteous.' So, they have to redefine what is evil and what is good. If it is evil to help others, then greed is good. You can't change human nature, but you can get wealth and power by exploiting its dark side. The straight and narrow, the ethical and moral has always been a hard sell. It requires sacrifice and being subjected to ridicule, mockery, persecution and sometimes martyrdom. Those are the laws of human nature. So, where are those willing to make the sacrifices and how are they portrayed in the media? We have been spoiled and have not made the sacrifices needed to counter the Rovian dark side and are waiting for the other guy to do it. That will not work.
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-09-05 17:52
bjw, I heard that Beck was a Mormon??
Otherwise I agree with what you said
 
 
+13 # Guest 2010-09-04 05:53
Asserting something over and over until it is believed has been a time-tested tactic of the Right Wing for a generation. Why are we surprised that Beck uses the tactic?! So how 'bout a counter movement: Glen Beck is a crazed demagogue and his pal Palin aspires to be an Evita clone.
 
 
+9 # Guest 2010-09-04 07:31
Quoting
Asserting something over and over until it is believed has been a time-tested tactic of the Right Wing for a generation. Why are we surprised that Beck uses the tactic?! So how 'bout a counter movement: Glen Beck is a crazed demagogue and his pal Palin aspires to be an Evita clone.


I cannot think of anyone so unlike Evita than Sarah Palin. Eva Peron was a successful actress and personality before she met Juan and was immersed in politics and as a genuine populist who efforts were on behalf of the poor and oppressed. She used her fame and her position to improve the lives of the lowest classes much to the disapproval of the wealthy and military classes. She worked herself into exhaustion running a charity to help workers, the sick and helpless overcome the effects of institutionaliz ed poverty. She used government channels to do it.

Palin prevented her state from aiding the Inuits when they were freezing and hungry. Palin is the anti-Peron.
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-09-04 07:37
Glenn Beck seems to get a thrill out of up ending patriotic and religious symbols and turning them into their opposites. How does he really feel about his gullible audience. I half expect him to come out one day and tell them what fools they are to fall for his bs. Or will he just Pied Piper them off a cliff and move to Aruba or the Emirates.
 
 
-1 # andresorges1960s 2010-09-07 11:52
Quoting
Asserting something over and over until it is believed has been a time-tested tactic of the Right Wing for a generation.


And Left Wing too.
 
 
+17 # Guest 2010-09-04 07:15
The U.S. has entered one more era of social and political change and serious confusion and misinformation. Beck is not necessarily the cause of it but he is definitely a symptom. Of course, with far more people in the U.S. with so many different religious beliefs, non-beliefs, demands, disappointments , suffering, and less and less education, those citizens are far easier to manipulate.

Beck and others are experts at that manipulation. These high profile people are not the only source of confusion and misinformation, either. It is happening on a state and local level and businesses and agencies are being infected in their personal lives, using the same techniques to manipulate those around them.

Corruption and bad entertainment definitely are infectious. Let's just hope citizens gain some strength and resist the urge to react with violence against the "enemies" the Beck types are offering up.
 
 
+8 # Guest 2010-09-04 08:23
Simply put Beck is a delusional misfit who has found a way to be someone while deep down feels he is a nothing. He is riding on the high of being noticed, made important and influential. He is now a megalomaniac with dangerous ideas... Hmmm... sounds familiar, eh mein freund & freundin? Watch out sane Americans...
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-09-04 09:10
I am not sure he is delusional. I think he knows exactly what he is doing. He's very good at what he does...shocking his audience, entertaining them with his act. One of these days, we might find out what he thinks of the fools who have made him rich. He is not harmless. He is as dangerous as we let him be.
 
 
+11 # Guest 2010-09-04 08:28
Just another diversionary tactic. Beck stepped into a major dog pile with his "Obama is a racist" remark.(Very costly to him personally in loss of sponsors, leaving him with shady gold dealers in place of blue chip corporations) This is his "offense is the best defense" re-attack in typical demagogue style. He is hoping that by branding Obama with a new bucket of tar made of both religious (bad commie religion but at least abandoning the "Obama is a muslim" bit this time) and cold war ingredients that will resonate well with his audience, all will conveniently ignore the dog poop still stuck to his shoe and his sponsors will get back to business as usual.

I think it is an error to speak of what Beck believes. It is mostly show, for the money, and Beck is a great actor by pundit standards at least. There is little knowing what he believes other that he believes that whatever he does will make him money.
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-09-04 09:04
Beck started out radio as shock jock type. He was fired many times for doing what he was paid to do and went over the line enough to learn where the line was. How is he different from any other shock jock? He has fine-tuned his style for TV for a wider audience. Now, he's so big, he can't be fired.
 
 
-11 # Guest 2010-09-04 10:26
Being an atheist, I do not totally buy much of Beck's religous stuff. Yet I totally agree with his message, and that is the most important. What is the message? The message is simple: move away from big state toward small state, get rid of PC/affirmative action cancer, put stress on self-reliance and free enterprise, reduce federal spendings. Essentially, the fundamental division line between people like Beck and people who do postings on this site is individualism (capitalism) versus collectivism (socilismsm/welfare state). Liberation Theology that caught up with some Africa-Ameircan preachers here in US is definitely on the side of forces of collectivism/Marxism (to look at the gospels from the poor's perspective). To argue that Obama personally advocates this stuff is absurd. Yet the fact that he matured (college, church ect) surrounded and affected by these ideas is true. Now, your minuses for my posting, or better ignore it - "zero." Like mlns who listen to Beck, I am just a zero red neck.
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-09-04 11:18
beck is selling the big corporate state. he is no populist, merely a wave-riding smoke-blower.
 
 
+8 # Guest 2010-09-04 14:23
The message is TOO simple. A nation of over 300 million people will never function with "small government". Thinking like a grown-up is hard work and most people would just rather go with the simple message. It never ends well.

This is as simple as I can make it: Capitalism is our economic system. Democracy is our political system. They are two different things. The rub is that one has to be the boss. It used to be democracy and Beck and all far-righters are trying to switch it to Wall street. It never ends well.

PS. Just how much did Jesus charge for the loaves and fishes?
 
 
+7 # Guest 2010-09-04 23:20
That may explain why there are so many prosperous right wing hate jocks and no progressive counterpart of any real magnitude. The simple message of fear and blame is easy to sell. The other side has no simple message because it insists on dealing with reality not an imaginary free market utopia waiting for Armageddon as its final bail out.
 
 
-4 # Guest 2010-09-04 15:39
Then, let's get rid of the Republic and divide into small nations just as the USSR did. Let the States print their own money, raise their own military, set up customs at their borders, restrict immigration from other States, and let's see how each fares under their own Constitution and economic choices. Why this divided house stand now that it has become impossible to govern as one nation. Let Texas be Texas! Let Alaska be Alaska! Let the lines be redrawn along the lines of blue, red and purple.

No reason to stay in this bad marriage. Let's file for a no-fault divorce based on irreconcilable differences.
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-09-04 23:10
The difference is that the Soviet Union was a colonial empire disguised by the fact that its colonies were adjoining land rather than distant territories. Those were separate nations in the first place. It was amusing to hear them rant about Imperialism when the USSR was the last big colonial empire standing. Alaska is not the same as Sarah Palin. Let her become her own country, after she colonizes Little Diomede.
 
 
+9 # Guest 2010-09-04 16:12
Having been raised with the Bible and having sat through countless sermons, I have to ask about these different perspectives to the gospels....one for the poor and one for the wealthy. I really don't see why one cannot be self-reliant and compassionate. One can believe in individual worth and also the value of collective action and interdependence . Certainly, that's what enabled our forefathers to endure so many hardships. It wasn't one or the other, but the combination of responsibilitie s and duties. There was the duty to do as much for oneself as possible and another duty to help one's neighbor as much as possible without expecting anything in return. It was doing your Christian duty. They had never heard of Marx or socialism or liberation theology. There was no such split as you describe. Some wealthy landowners recognized their duty to those who toiled for them and some didn't. Some factory owners were cruel and heartless, some weren't. The difference was the amount of unnecessary suffering.
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-09-04 16:39
Moving away from big state to little state: Impossible. The USA is an empire now and the military industrial corporate congressional complex will not allow this..ever. Get rid of PC/affirmative action cancer: Why? Affirmative action is working pretty well over all. Sure there are problems in equitable application but overall, it is fine. As for PC - sorry, that is permanent no matter who is in power. Put stress on self reliance: at what time in American history was this not highly valued? Responsible social welfare programs are not a contradiction of self reliance development. It can enhance the possibility when done well.

Free enterprise? Doesn't exist anymore given corporate monopoly over the market. Reduce federal spending: Yes! Cut corporate welfare and military spending by half. Problem solved.

As for your final comment, you may be quite correct. That you believe that any public figure of substance is Marxist assures this. As for welfare states: there is no other kind of state.
 
 
-1 # andresorges1960s 2010-09-07 12:15
Dear Daniel,
I do strongly agree with one part of your message. Yes, yes, of course, cut corporate welfare and military. No doubt. And that is the major problems with many conservatives, who do not want to touch this. Just like Dems guard their welfare programs for the "wretched of the earth," Reps have their own sacred cows. See, here is the problem that disturbs many people today, who cannot stand this situation anymore. Several generations of corporate leaders and, yes, folks down below grew up with a sense of entitlement. I cannot forget how disgusted I was when some of my Polish/Russian/Hungarian friends played a "Jewish card" in 1990-1991, pretending they were persecuted Jews. The goal was to get US residency permits and "sit on welfare," as some of them put it. If welfare was so easy to "sit on," there would have been less waste. The same with corporations: I honestly do not understand why we need to bail out GM, Goldman Sachs, ect. Let the bastards fail.
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-09-04 21:56
It's not that simple. Was the $800B handout to Wall St. collectivist? The idea that anything that limits the finance sector's ability to further concentrate wealth must be Marxist is absurd.

When wealth inequality becomes extreme, redistributive economic policies (primarily high top tier taxes) act to encourage competition by breaking up monopoly and preventing further entrenchment of elite power. You should read someone other than Ayn Rand.
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-09-05 20:22
If you say so!
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-09-04 08:49
lIBERATION THEOLOGY???

Is Beck even a Catholic??

Hasn't he heard of "Thou shalt not lie"??
 
 
+6 # Guest 2010-09-04 16:30
Not only was Beck raised Catholic, he attended Catholic schools until his mother's death (suicide according to Beck) soon after his parents divorce. He started working in radio at age 13 and got radio jobs right out of high school. He did not have the benefit of a stable home life or of a college education. Much of his adulthood was spent under the influence of drugs and alcohol. He converted to Mormonism and became a success as a showman. Is an actor lying when he's playing a role? He has found a way to act out and be as bad as he wants to be and make a fortune at it. It's one version of the American dream.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-09-04 09:09
Beck' simple grasp of his new marketing tact is good enough for some. Beck and successful right wing people appeal to instinct not reason. Instinct repeats what we thought we knew, reason refines it. His people cultivate instinctual regression. We will never change these people. Being a dualistic nation of either or, the majority on the left will tolerate and be taken advantage of due to their willingness to co exist. If we split the nation,let Beck/Palin have things their way in their own version of the US, and quit dragging them into the future. Let them settle into their regressive fog as they wish. We don't have to fight about it as it won't solve anything anyway. Just let them go,loose the ball and chain.
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-09-04 16:36
I agree. Let's take a marker to a map of the United States and divide the whole country into Red, Blue, Lilac Magenta. Forget the historical boundaries. Divide it into political divisions based on voting patterns.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-09-04 09:49
Beck is half right. James Cone is not one of the founders of Liberation Theology. He is one of the founders, however, of Black Liberation Theology - which borrows heavily from the Liberation Theology developed by Catholic clerics in Latin American countries in the 60's and 70's.

That being said, so what?

Beck is demonizing Liberation Theology because it differs from the brand of Christianity that he grew up with. Another example of Right-Wing Conservatives wanting to make the world in their image.
 
 
-7 # Guest 2010-09-04 11:18
Beck demonized Lib Theology because it blends Marxism and religion. By the way, Marxists and socialists in Latin America groups always treated LT as their ally that would help them to find a key to the heart of laboring masses and eventually to convert them to the gospel of Marxism (do not forget that Marxism/socialism have strong religious component, a vision of a paradise on the earth where all people would live like brothers and sisters). Personally, I do not think that you need to play god stuff (like Beck does) to debunk the bankrupt ideas of socialism/welfare state, but a lot of people in US (unlike Europe) have strong religious convictions. Hence, Beck's own version of "Liberation Theology" based on individualism, capitalism, charity, founding fathers, ect. If it helps us to at least partially dismantle the welfare state and debunk socialism, I am all for it. After all, as I wrote in another posting, I do not want to go Greek or French. Do you?
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-09-04 16:48
There is no other kind of state than a welfare state. By definition and design, all states are a convergence of people for a variety of purposes universal to the human condition. The ONLY variation is whose welfare receives priority. Socialism is not mutually exclusive of self reliance in that it simply affirms that the common good trumps individual greed, and yes, even an individual good. It posits that the good of everyone is in fact synonymous with the good of every single person. There are successful socialist states and others in trouble. Chine is a communist capitalist state that is becoming the number two power in the world. The USA is a failing capitalist state. It cannibalizes it's own market rather than develops it. It's consumer base is eroding rapidly very much due to the neglect of mafia capitalism and our standing in the world is plunging. The standard of living is higher in at least 8 other countries, most of whom are socialist. Bankrupt capitalism stinks.
 
 
+2 # andresorges1960s 2010-09-05 11:47
Quoting
Chine is a communist capitalist state that is becoming the number two power in the world.


A communist capitalist state!? Hmm...Sounds interesting, and in fact, exactly describes the situation where current China lingers on. For how long? I am wondering if you can be a little bit pregnant? Eventually, I think they (Chinese) will have to decide which way they will be going. If they unleash the forces of economic freedom more and more, it will at some point require political freedoms (freedom of speech, freedom of press, freedom to vote etc), which will eventually undermine their soft communist dictatorship unless their comm. elite decides to turn the clock back (like in 1989). As for China becoming the number two power, who knows - miracles happen. So far, as I see, Chinese folks use each opportunity and all their ingenuity to sneak into here(US) or at least into Canada to live right in the "belly of the beast" (stinking capitalism)
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-09-05 12:31
Quoting
You might have mentioned the priests who advocated liberation theology and were then excommunicated due to the actions of the present pope. People like Dom Helder come to mind ("When I give food to the poor, people call me a saint. When I ask why the poor have no food, people call me a Marxist.")


Yes, it is interesting that communism is not necessarily a contradiction of capitalist economic practice, any more that socialism would contradict democracy. I mean, political ideology and economic systems don't necessarily seem to always match. Rest assured, a majority of people in socialist states prefer socialism and also like a robust capitalist economic structure.

Oh, and China becoming the number two economic power on this planet is an imminent FACT, empowered by it's capitalistic economic behaviors, and you can be sure it will remain a quasi-communist/socialist state, perhaps for the long distant future. As "freely" as our way of life happens to be.
 
 
-1 # Guest 2010-09-04 16:53
Go Greek or French? Does that have something to do with cooking or kissing? It sounds a bit sexy and risque.
 
 
+6 # Guest 2010-09-04 16:45
Liberation Theology is not so different than regular Catholic theology except less accepting of oppression and encouraging throwing off the yokes. Beck would have certainly heard all sides of the controversy while he was attending Catholic schools. He seems to be in a delayed teen-age rebellion stage. He reminds me of the adolescent cooking up new ways to shock his parents and teachers. Most of us grew out of that stage.
 
 
+7 # Guest 2010-09-04 10:35
When Beck says we need to drop any church we belong to if that church preaches what we generally call the social gospel, he is showing strong anti-religious bias! His religion is not Christianity (or Mormonism) but materialism. He needs to read Matt:25. What God commands individuals to do, groups, even the government, must do if the individuals are not capable as individuals. And to reform society, we need the force of law.
Is this American? It sure is. See works of Jefferson, Paine, Franklin, and other "Founders." The needs of the community must not be ignored.
 
 
+9 # Guest 2010-09-04 13:10
Glenn Beck's "liberation theology" comments don't bother me as much as the fact that no one - ABSOLUTELY NO ONE - has President Obama's back. And the more the Right Wing attacks him, the more others feel that they can jump on the bandwagon. As the leader of the Free World, it's not his place to fend off these attacks by a group of 2-bit hustlers. To a great extent, I blame the mainstream media, his administration, and congressional Democrats, etc. for not setting the record straight.

For example, there's a woman by the name of Orly Taitz, a Russian-born naturalized American citizen (since 1992), who started the "birther" movement. She got headlines when she created not one but TWO obviously phony Obama birth certificates, yet she still commands the stage whenever she chooses to speak. This obvious lie has been propagated not only by extreme right-wingers, but by Fox News and Republican members of Congress (Can anyone say the Senate Minority Leader?). Just outrageous!
 
 
+6 # Guest 2010-09-04 14:53
Don, you stated nicely what I much too informally attempted. The system has changed dramatically, in spite of there being much corruption and misdirection in the past. The increasingly obvious takeover of the country and the government by the conniving wealthy, such as the much discussed Koch brothers, has broken down the system of respect for the office(s) in each form of government.

The need for news in every 24 hour television and radio program and the liberty to flaunt even the most twisted player, such as Taitz, is rendering the U.S. a tottering, overweight, slobbering laughing stock.
 
 
+6 # Guest 2010-09-04 17:08
I think you are right about everything except Orly's role in the birther hoax. She did not start it, but became its queen. She did not create the phony birth certificates, but promoted them while saying the official one produced from the State of Hawaii was phony. Most of the stuff she promotes is from some of the same people who made up stuff about Kerry and gave us the term 'swiftboaters.' Orly just repeats the stuff breathlessly on TV and just as breathlessly in court pleadings. So far, it has gotten her a $20,000 fine which was recently backed by the Supreme Court. Then, she ran for secretary of state of California. She resembles Palin in her inability to tell the truth on any occasion. Some people find that fascinating and even attractive.
 
 
+6 # Guest 2010-09-04 17:35
Beck is stuck in an adolescent stage of rebellion due to traumatic events during that stage of his life. Liberation Theology was a controversy of the period he was in Catholic schools and he's now taking sides that do not exist any longer. He reacting about 40 years after the fact. The current pope made determinations about which part of LT was valid and which part had to be tossed. Fighting for social justice was alright. Saying history is about nothing but class struggle and rewriting church teachings in Marxist language had to go. It would have included the church hierarchy as part of the oppressors class to be struggled against. It is a rare hierarchical figure that would accept have his authority challenged.

The Catholic Church has moved on but Glenn Beck is stuck back in high school acting out against perceived commies in the priesthood.
 
 
+7 # Guest 2010-09-04 14:49
Agree with you 100% Don E.!! There is no way that the President of the US should have to even acknowledge that these right-wing(nuts) even exist. But exactly who is counter-punching their ridiculous statements, pronouncements and accusations all in an attempt to "take down" President Obama. It is truly a shame that in a great country like the United States, clowns such as Beck and Palin (and others too numerous to name) get so much air-time! Incredible!
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-09-04 16:53
Maybe we aren't taking the Democratic Party sufficiently to task for failing to support their President. If they don't believe in him enough to run interference for him, maybe it is the Party rank and file that needs to be deposed and replaced, not the president. Okay. I'm going to vote for sure coming up but I'm taking my representatives to task for failing to support the President.
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-09-04 17:14
Glenn Beck is the male money whore and Sarah Palin the female money whore!! When can we never hear from either one of these idiots!!!!
 
 
+8 # Guest 2010-09-04 20:10
As America's first african american president Obama has tried too ardently to prove himself as 'the good negro".
His disavowal of Rev Jeremiah Wright bears this out.
Wright speaks from experience and truth.

Obama's pathological quest for bipartisan support should have educated him enough to realize it would never occur.
He wants to be the "pragmatist" and hopes history will record him as such.

Look at Jimmy Carter.
A decent man who was more a humanitarian than Obama but whose legacy was buried or ultimately ridiculed by the rightwing corporate media.

Beck is no academic.
At best, he's a two bit demagogue with absolutely no handle on sociology, history or political science.
He's a lazy thinker ... with the exception of his sense of showmanship.... which to an intelligent person would appear cheesy at best.

This is the state of the struggle.
As americans we can only hope and wait til' a better show comes to town.
 
 
+1 # andresorges1960s 2010-09-05 12:25
[quote name="David R Velasquez"] Obama has tried too ardently to prove himself as 'the good negro". His disavowal of Rev Jeremiah Wright bears this out.
Wright speaks from experience and truth.

Are you serious of joking, writing this stuff about Obama and Wright? Although not a fan of Obama, I have to jump to defend the guy. What did you want President do to? To publicly endorse Rev. Wright's "wisdom" and "truth" of Afro-centric views?
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-09-05 14:22
It borders on the hilarious that this hate-filled, sobbing egomaniac fear monger with a disgraceful personal track record is now a "faith leader." Like so many before, and unfortunately ahead, of him, he is but another false and selfish phony. The problem is he has put our nation, America, in his bulls eye. I hope karma catches up to him and his disgraceful lot soon.
 
 
-2 # Guest 2010-09-08 06:22
The evidence that Obama is a "liberation theologist" is his decades-long attendance at a church that was a leading proponent of liberation theology and his explicit advocacy of liberation theology sprinkled throughout his speeches.

Lee Nason
New Bedford, Massachusetts
 
 
-1 # Shella 2010-11-09 08:50
Glen Beck is right and the writer of this article is an uninformed idiot.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.