Email This Page
add comment
read more of todays top articles

Robert Scheer: "Some guys have all the luck, particularly when they supply the dice. There would be no housing crisis were it not for radical financial deregulation legislation that Weill and other Wall Street hotshots got Clinton to approve."

Sandy Weill, the former CEO and chairman of Citigroup Inc, 10/01/09. (photo: Business Insider)
Sandy Weill, the former CEO and chairman of Citigroup Inc, 10/01/09. (photo: Business Insider)

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+50 # James Cremin Jr 2010-11-17 09:40
I guess we're in big trouble because all the "new" folks in congress will support the Sandy Weills of the USA. MONEY talks. MONEY is power. Us normal folks are just peasants. Long live the powerful.
Sadly and Pessimistically ,

Jim "Baldy" Cremin
 
 
+47 # Jonathan Back 2010-11-17 10:41
Again, F. Scott Fitzgerald almost a century ago, stood on a crate in his classic Hyde Park oratory style and the crowd leaned forward and he said with dramatic pause,” Let me tell you Brethren, the Rich and the Super Rich are different from you and I". I have shared that I was born in to a super rich family and was disenfranchised (kicked out) when I joined the military and volunteered to serve in Nam. The family thought I had betrayed them by joining the ranks of "expandable fodder". That was the term my Grandpa used to describe the 98% of folks who are poor. To join the ranks of the 2% you need a minimum net worth of 10 million. When I made my own fortune I realized I was becoming as numb as the rest of the 2% towards the plight of the poor – so I gave all my money away and I am much happier. Money does corrupt the soul. Beware!
 
 
+2 # Antonia Myss 2010-11-20 10:53
Don't you mean "exPENDable" fodder?
 
 
-50 # TommyD1of11 2010-11-17 12:28
Jim,

Rejoice! Rejoice!

Those "new" folks in Congress just voted to ban the corrupt bribery driven practice of Earmarks.

BTW

9 of 10 Top Donors in 2004 gave exclusively to Dems; the 10th gave to both.

Wall St generally gives 3:1 in favor of Dems

In 2010, Tea Party backed candidates were funded primarily via grassroots, small donors. Their opponents (i.e. "old" Congress) was funded primarily by special interests.
 
 
+46 # Jonathan Back 2010-11-17 15:49
Hello TommyD10d11 - You must have done some research unfortunately your information sources are incorrect. Almost makes me think you work for the KOCH brothers who bank rolled the TEA party persons. But this is our democracy and one can distribute misinformation. But some of us do very diligent research also and we are not buying your posting here.
 
 
+31 # Fred Sokolow 2010-11-18 01:58
Quoting
Jim,

Rejoice! Rejoice!

Those "new" folks in Congress just voted to ban the corrupt bribery driven practice of Earmarks.

BTW

9 of 10 Top Donors in 2004 gave exclusively to Dems; the 10th gave to both.

Wall St generally gives 3:1 in favor of Dems

In 2010, Tea Party backed candidates were funded primarily via grassroots, small donors. Their opponents (i.e. "old" Congress) was funded primarily by special interests.


The "facts" above are total fantasy. Billionaires like the Koch brothers are as far as you can get from 'grass roots" support. Also big oil, pharma and other major capitalists back the tea party. Check it out, these lies cannot stand.
 
 
+22 # judy b-w 2010-11-18 12:24
The Tea Party was started by David Koch, a billionaire whose father started the John Birch Society. Koch Industries, a conglomerate run by the Koch brothers, owns both oil and coal companies that are very polluting, more so than most energy companies.
 
 
+14 # CarrieLK 2010-11-19 10:30
Tommy, none of what you say is true. Every single one of your statements can be refuted by facts that are so easily available, I'm surprised you didn't check. There's a whole world of facts out there beyond Fox News' lies.

And banning earmarks, a) is such a small amount it means little to our economy and, b) will end up giving more spending authority to the president. Congratulations , your ignorance is doing exactly the opposite of your intentions.
 
 
+5 # Annette Smith 2010-11-20 12:40
What planet are you living on?
The new folks in congress haven't voted on ANYTHING yet! Your stat on Wall St. giving is totally concocted, and everyone knows by now that the Tea Parties have been largely funded by Dick Armey and the Koch brothers.
 
 
+2 # Matt Matthews 2010-11-21 22:29
I'm not sure sbout this, but I believe that the Tea Baggers were actually bankrolled by some rather wealthy special interests - think Fox "News" personalities Glenn Beck and some of those he promotes in his rants. The Koch family? Probably. In any case, they could not have collected enough truly grass roots contributions to mount the campaigns they did. It is not physically possible at a few dollars a pop, which is what most of the small donors can afford.
 
 
+14 # Gary S 2010-11-17 21:23
"will support the Sandy Weills"?
Shhh! In TommyD10d11's world, the "new" folks took office on November 5th.
 
 
+7 # CarrieLK 2010-11-19 10:31
Good point.
 
 
+61 # Kingbirdone 2010-11-17 10:00
This guy gets away with destroying the world's economy with no penalty; Sarah Palin is seriously considered a presidential contender. The USA is quickly becoming the "buggy whip" society of the 21st century
 
 
+3 # Steve H 2010-11-21 15:09
Quoting
This guy gets away with destroying the world's economy with no penalty; Sarah Palin is seriously considered a presidential contender. The USA is quickly becoming the "buggy whip" society of the 21st century


Kingbird: No disrespect but the use of the phrase "quickly becoming" doesn't bear witness to the facts. I don't know about the "buggy" but the Powers That Be have been whipping our own downtrodden, many of whom were willing whipping boys, along with anyone in the world who gets in our way ever since our nation's western expansion. Zinn's book ("A People's History of the United States") pretty much separates fact from fiction and truth from propaganda. So this really shouldn't be anything new to those paying attention.

If we want to stop this nation's Machines of Mass Destruction, the people will have to see that the system needs radical alteration and that means each of us, until we become a super majority, has to radically alter our lifestyles and consumption patterns.
 
 
+34 # Nan 2010-11-17 10:21
Welcome to the Gilded Age redux!
 
 
+53 # Lola 2010-11-17 10:26
Quite frankly the USA is becoming the 'laughing stock' of the 21st century.
 
 
+9 # jcmilazzo 2010-11-17 10:44
Try FactCheck.org
http://www.factcheck.org/2008/10/who-caused-the-economic-crisis/
 
 
+28 # steve 2010-11-17 11:47
That FactCheck article is two years old. It underestimates the problems with the banks and barely touches on the enormous derivative con game that's threatening to sink the economy. It sees the economic crisis solely as the puncturing of the housing bubble, which seems to me to be a fraction of the derivative liability.
 
 
+10 # karenvista 2010-11-18 19:00
Quoting
It underestimates the problems with the banks and barely touches on the enormous derivative con game that's threatening to sink the economy.


Absolutely correct Steve. The derivatives liability is multiples of the world's GDP. No one could possibly think that it won't come crashing down again soon because nothing has been done to curb it and the "too big to fail" companies are only bigger now that they have done some more M&A business. Also, the mortgage disaster wasn't a problem of personal responsibility. This happened from the top down, not the bottom up. 60% of borrowers were "guided" into subprime loans even though they qualified for prime rates and no one knows who actually owns a large percentage of their mortgages because the companies set-up a tax dodge they named MERS to record ownership because they didn't want to pay the counties' title registration taxes every time they bundled and sold mortgages in various derivatives. They have created a gigantic, criminal mess and should all go to prison.
 
 
0 # lariokie 2010-11-21 11:13
Indeed they need to all be in prison--maybe in Guantanamo. But it won't happen until we have a champion in the White House. This guy is definitely NOT the champion of the poor and middle class. It is difficult to see a path out of this since the mainstream media, including NPR, are all part of the plan to impoverish the 99%.
 
 
+4 # lariokie 2010-11-21 10:40
That is one perspective, and certainly part of the problem. But to say that the destruction of Glass-Steagal was not a factor is not credible. Indeed, there were many reasons for the collapse, but the deregulation of the banks was among the most prominent reasons.
 
 
+52 # Lee Black 2010-11-17 10:52
The last few days Republicans have been saying they want Obama to be more like Bill Clinton was - this is exactly what they are talking about - deregulation. Free enterprise to these people means being free to do anything they want to make lots of money. No regard for the people, the country, ecology.
 
 
+18 # SOF 2010-11-17 12:19
Yeah, they really liked Clinton. Do they think we have no memory of that time. They are rewriting history -again.
 
 
+29 # bjw 2010-11-17 12:26
No doubt Obama will become more like Bill Clinton when the new House holds up funding for any good legislation that got passed last session and they shut down the government like happened under Newt the Newt. Obama is over the same kind of barrel and lives in the same kind of bubble. Let's pray they do not come up with a Monica-type scandal or distraction. They tried the birther thing, the Muslim thing, and a whole lot more will be coming. I shudder to think of all the crap we are going to be subjected to.
 
 
+10 # Lee Black 2010-11-18 13:16
I'm very concerned with the Republican House attempts to derail health care. You're right about the way they'll try to come up with a distraction. It's hard to imagine what else they can come up with but a Rove type can always come up with something.
 
 
+3 # FH 2010-11-17 10:56
So can we scapegoat this guy already?
 
 
+13 # bjw 2010-11-17 13:17
To scapegoat him would imply that he is innocent and does not merit any of the punishment he is singled out for.

The whole point was that he was at the center of the banking cabal that brought down the economy while he and his cohorts profited.

Scapegoat? Hardly. Even if he were indicted, Eric Holder would make sure he is not punished in the same we he pushed the Marc Rich pardon through with the help of Scooter Libby (Rich's lawyer).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scapegoating
 
 
+39 # Richard Cummings 2010-11-17 11:04
Be assured, the worst is yet to come. As Lenin said, "Give the capitalists enough rope and they will hang themselves.'
 
 
-50 # TommyD1of11 2010-11-17 12:37
Nice qoute, except it was the Commie's who ultimately hanged themselves. Our 2007 financial melt down was caused not by too little regulation but rather by too much government intervention by Fannie, Freddie, FHA, FHLB and CRA. The "worst yet to come" will be entirely of the government's making ($110 TRILLION in unfunded liabilities for SocSec, Medicare and Medicaid.
 
 
+12 # Tony44 2010-11-17 16:14
SS? There is NO impact there - by law SS cannot borrow, in fact it currently has a S2.6 TRILLON surplus, all collected from
 
 
+28 # Dr. K 2010-11-17 17:27
Cheesus, Tommy: Enough with the stale Fannie, Freddie, FHA lies. The problem was deregulation bought/brought about by the banking cartel with the able assistance of Dick Armey and Phil Gramm, two of Newt's boys. Clinton the corporatist bought into it, and the rest is (a sad) history!
 
 
+9 # CarrieLK 2010-11-19 10:37
This is why democracy is its own worst enemy. You can tell any lies you want. People who are not very bright or too lazy to check facts will believe them. And they will vote. You must have an educated electorate in order for democracy to work. Tommy, sadly, proves that democracy is in big trouble in the U.S.
 
 
+2 # lariokie 2010-11-21 11:27
Whoa, Tommy, you have had waaaaay too much Kool Aid, dude. Come back down to earth before you try to join an intelligent conversation. You are spending too much time on the Hypnosis Channel (FAUX News). Did you get those numbers from a right wing porn site?

What do you have to say about the criminal enterprises that were in the middle of this crisis: Goldman Sachs, Citi, Wells Fargo, BofA, AIG, the ratings companies, et al.?
 
 
+39 # Phillip 2010-11-17 11:05
The rich get richer, while the poor get poorer.

Welcome to America - the world's newest third world country.
 
 
+17 # bjw 2010-11-17 13:05
Obviously there has been a re-ordering. I was never sure what the second world countries were. Did we miss that category on the way down? Are China and India now among the first world countries? What about Chile? They reacted in a very first world sort of way to the mine disaster and their /tsunami disaster while we have flubbed most of ours.

I do agree that our government and leaders are acting more like third world corrupt nations as well as the widening gulf between the wealthiest and other 98%.

Let them talk about class warfare. Class warfare is how we got our independence and a new form of democracy that we seem to have given up on. It will take some kind of popular resistance to bring it back and it just is not happening. This acquiescence is what is so dispiriting.
 
 
+6 # karenvista 2010-11-18 19:33
Quoting
Obviously there has been a re-ordering. I was never sure what the second world countries were. Did we miss that category on the way down?


bjw, we missed a couple of rungs on the way, way, way, down. Third world countries at least export raw materials to the first/second world manufacturing countries. If you saw the pictures that went around recently of the gigantic Maersk trans-pacific container ships-they come here filled with Chinese junk that Americans buy at Wal-Mart and go back to China empty! Apparently the only thing we have exported to China recently are the steel beams from the World Trade Center after the 9/11 attack. We must be a fourth world temporary borrower/consumer country 'cause borrowing and consuming without selling or producing anything other than fraudulent securities can't last too long.
 
 
+26 # backyard farmer 2010-11-17 11:05
Actually, we are becoming the laughing stock of the 21st century.
 
 
+1 # Activista 2010-11-17 11:07
Clintons are controlled by rich - they are pawns of AIPAC/Israel. And Obama is controlled by Clintons.
We will start Iran war - financed by Chineese credit cards.
Banana Republic of USrael
 
 
-26 # Monique Koller 2010-11-17 11:48
This is anti-Jewish.
 
 
+12 # Wm. ONeil 2010-11-17 14:17
No, Monique, it's anti-radical-Zionism.
Big difference between those two; there are more Jews opposed to the Bibi/Avigdor gang than not. IMHO, of course...
 
 
+5 # NoOneYouKnow 2010-11-17 15:14
AIPAC/Israel are "the rich"? Ah, no. The real rich don't have much to do with Israel; they have the US to play with.
 
 
+14 # hasapiko 2010-11-17 11:13
Since its founding bankers have almost always controlled the US government. This was Hamilton's grand strategy. Read the history. Schlesinger's "Age of Jackson" for starters.
 
 
+48 # maxx 2010-11-17 11:19
As long as idiot Americans refuse to believe that class warfare is from above and denigrate anything sensible as "Socialist" they will get the $hit that deserve and like it.

The idiots actually discuss nitwits like Palin and the Bush crime family as sensible "leaders". Our Grandparents would be rightly ashamed of us for electing such people and espousing their old ideas that have NEVER worked.
 
 
+7 # forparity 2010-11-17 19:22
Like progressive economist Dean Baker and Conova, etc., you'll notice that Bush is not mentioned in the piece - rather it's Clinton. Get it?
 
 
+24 # giraffe 2010-11-17 11:21
My question is: Knowing what the mixture of banking with Wall Street is, has been and will continue to do in the future, how do we get the Supreme United States Supreme Court to determine the mix is unconstitutiona l? Surely, the middle class will continue to trickle down to the lower class. The Supreme Court has to find in the constitution THAT which preserves our democracy. WHY? Without a middle class - there is no democracy.
 
 
+18 # SOF 2010-11-17 12:25
Impeach the Supreme Court 'justices' who have taken on the corporate agenda. These people think their money will save them from the future they helped create. Probably their children are also 'artificial persons' so they don't have to worry, or maybe their hearts are just black and shriveled. Like their patriotism. Oh wait, they want plutocracy! We're so screwed it doesn't matter if we get arrested for demonstrating against them.!
 
 
+46 # Terry 2010-11-17 11:23
Surely by now you Americans realize that the endless "debate" between the Republicans and Democrats is a total farce and encouraged by those that are the ultimate winners in the debacle that has taken place in your country.

The government is controlled by and run for the continued enrichment of the bankers. The corrupt "Federal" Reserve to the slime at Goldman Sachs, have bought the country, control the legislation and systematically work to undermine the gains made by working people over the past century.

Some of these people have never worked an honest day in their life. They are high stakes gamblers who have only their personal gain in mind and will and have destroyed much of what America was.

It is time to put aside the partisan politics and address the real issues and causes of your present decline. It is not too late but if the wealthy continue to keep the partisan fight alive you are surely doomed.

Where is the old spirit of '76?
 
 
+7 # genierae 2010-11-17 13:53
Terry: What are you suggesting? Do you really think that a revolution, such as we had in the beginning, could work? This country is too big, and too populous for that kind of rebellion to succeed. There's no way that the American people could organize in sufficient numbers to take over. The rich elites own the government, the media, the politicians, and the military, and they will do any dirty, lowdown thing to stay in power. The only bright spot is that their way of life is unsustainable. It is destined to break down, sooner rather than later, and when it does, we the people, will be waiting to take our country back. And once we take it back, we will keep it. While we wait, we need to strengthen our local positions, organize with like-minded people, and create self-sustaining communities that serve the common good. Good people, working locally, across this country, can build a strong network of support that we will need in difficult times. That needs to be the new spirit of 2010.
 
 
+2 # Dan Fletcher 2010-11-18 22:16
Your version for change is correct and the one I prefer but I think you need to reconsider that a revolution such as we had in the begining could not or would not work because this country is too big, and too populous for that kind of rebellion to succeed. Your words sound like the phrase "too big to fail" in describing the Wall Street and bank bail out. There has never been a country too big and too populous for a revolution to not succeed. In reality, our population has everything but the will for revolution right now. And I do mean everything but. Numerically...at a ratio of 9 to 1, the "9" could wipe out to the last man, woman and child that of the "1". Not without horrific loss of life all around, but when I calculate what I've read referred to as "the devil's arithmatic", with sufficient motivation, it is impossible to conclude that violent revolution can ever be ruled out as a possibility, no matter how awful such would be. And yes, the way things are going, the possibility of it grows daily. We should pray it never happens, but then we're only a sufficient degree of near universal suffering away from that happening and would do well to realize this.
 
 
+25 # Marian Blanton 2010-11-17 11:43
"Those who ignore the lessons of history are condemned to repeat it." Both the Civil Rights movement and a forced end to the Viet Nam War came from organized resistance. Until enough Americans are energized to protest, our Congress will continue to be "the best that money can buy." Only mass pressure finally brought down the Soviet Union. Who is today's Watch Dog?
 
 
+3 # CarrieLK 2010-11-19 10:47
It used to the the press, Marian. But they got co-opted a couple of decades ago. There are new news organizations out there, but they're a bit scattered. Until someone of prominence--say a Warren Buffet--stands up and speaks truth, these ideas will linger in the chatrooms of liberal, alternative news organizations.
 
 
0 # Activista 2010-11-19 17:15
"Only mass pressure finally brought down the Soviet Union"
more like wars and military spending - it is military stupid - and US is on the same track ..
 
 
+14 # Kelly 2010-11-17 11:43
Welcome to the plutocracy
 
 
+18 # iamericanperson 2010-11-17 11:48
FocUS: Amend the re-constructionist 's US Constitution so a corporation does not have rights as a "person". Take back what was to be the power of sovereign responsibilitie s from corporate sociopath recklessness.
 
 
+8 # James Marcus 2010-11-17 11:50
'THE' man? Hardly.
Part of THE Insidious Team? Yes.
High Level Patsy.
'THE Man' (Men) are rarely seen, or heard from.
 
 
+9 # Alturn 2010-11-17 12:17
The best thing that can happen is that people digest the lies such as this one that we have been fed since the early 1980s about what makes for a good life. It isn't about who has the most toys wins. Life is about something far more beautiful and inspiring. When we search for that all those obsessed with making life about nothing more than making money will lose their power.

"All the changes taking place in the world are creating awareness in people, who have decided that enough is enough; they have a right to be free and to enjoy life. They no longer want to be conditioned by politics, religion or commercializati on.
Life has to be balanced, and we have to be aware of the Self in the heart."
- World Teacher Maitreya, from April 1990 Share International magazine
 
 
-11 # genierae 2010-11-17 14:03
"Seek ye first the Kingdom of Heaven; all else will be added to you."
 
 
+4 # banichi 2010-11-18 19:20
Amen and well said. When life is about what is in your heart, not what is or could be in your pocket - beyond what will sustain you - there is a richness to life that no new toy can compare to. It can't be bought or sold.
 
 
-24 # TommyD1of11 2010-11-17 12:18
You're ignoring $8+ TRILLION gorillas in the room (Fannie, Freddie, FHA, VA, FHLB) as well as the massive role of the CRA (Community Reinvestment Act) in distorting otherwise reational markets.

Collectively, they are responsible for 26.7 million Subprime and Alt-A mortgages. These are the very loans at the heart of the financial meltdown yet somehow you manage to completely ignore the role played by these GSE's, governtmant agencies and pro-active goventment legislation.

For those readers who are intellectually more honest and want to better understand this complex subject, I suggest you

SLAUGHTER OF THE INNOCENTS
Who Was Taking the Risks That Caused the Financial Crisis?
by Peter Wallison

www.aei.org/outlook/101004

It's relatively short but thorough and will significantly up your I.Q. on this subject.

Wallison has been writing about the housing bubble since the early 1990's.
 
 
+14 # barbara ginns 2010-11-17 15:09
Quoting
You're ignoring $8+ TRILLION gorillas in the room (Fannie, Freddie, FHA, VA, FHLB) as well as the massive role of the CRA (Community Reinvestment Act) in distorting otherwise reational markets.

Collectively, they are responsible for 26.7 million Subprime and Alt-A mortgages. These are the very loans at the heart of the financial meltdown yet somehow .

Your are not very well informed if you believe that Fannie, Freddie VA and CRA have anything to do with the fraud that the banks committed when they made their PREDATORY loans, then securitized the loans, but didn't put the loans into the pools. THE BANKS KEPT THE LOANS IN THEIR PORTFOLIOS, THAT IS WHY THEY WANT THE PROPERTIES NOW. THE LOANS WERE ALREADY PAID OFF BY INSURANCE ON THE POOLS OF LOANS (AIG, PMI, MI, ETC., tarp funds, etc.) YOU REALLY NEED TO EDUCATE YOURSELF.
 
 
+13 # Dr. K 2010-11-17 17:30
Tommy, they couldn't DO the loans until they changed the law. And that was done by a republican congress with the aid of the Clinton corporitists. so rail all you want about Fannie and Freddy, but that is after the fact. Sorry dude.
 
 
+9 # Dr. K 2010-11-17 17:38
By the way, Peter Wallison has been writing about Fannie & freddie for a long time, on behalf of the conservative Hoover Institute. He has wanted to privatize the two. And given the history of the whole sub-prime fiasco, we just would have been on the hook to bail them out while the bosses walked away with millions.
 
 
+3 # karenvista 2010-11-18 20:01
The entities that you named can't be responsible for creating Alt-A and Subprime Mortgages sold to homeowners because they are not originators. They don't create loans they only underwrite them (back them as they are written and agreed to.)

Remember G.W. Bush's "Ownership Society?" He's the president who pushed the highest level of low income home ownership so you should save some of your anger for him.

Also, try to get information somewhere other than the American Enterprise Institute if you want a somewhat more realistic view.
 
 
+14 # Tom Sawyer 2010-11-17 13:11
A good place to start nibbling on the super rich would be to require that all common stock must be held a minimum of 24 hours (attacking the flash trading world where big blocks of stock are only held for seconds if the price moves). The next step would be to mandate that one can only buy insurance on ones actual exposure to lose, thus eliminating a major part of the derivative world. Both are hard to do with most of congress owned by wall street. Our only hope is the election of the those who are brave enough to attack the establishment.
 
 
+4 # DJ Watson 2010-11-18 08:50
Tom, you are right on!!!!
 
 
-16 # elsa Lewin 2010-11-17 13:48
Wow! Another anti-Israel post. You guys are relentless--and WRONG! I am surprised you don't blame Katrina on Israel.
I would like to know if there is a reason my comments are never posted. Am I doing something wrong? Please let me know.
 
 
+12 # muriel schnierow 2010-11-17 14:08
This exchange exhibits much intelligence, much truth, and
energy. I think there are more of us than there are of them. i have never seen so much energy and justified anger. Good sign.
 
 
+2 # CarrieLK 2010-11-19 10:51
OK, Muriel, but how do we get together and make a movement?
 
 
+10 # genierae 2010-11-17 14:09
Why is Robert Scheer so easy on Bill Clinton? He is equally responsible for what happened, and I find it hard to believe that such an intelligent man could have been duped so easily. It is very puzzling to me that President Obama is judged much more harshly than is President Clinton.
 
 
+20 # granny 2010-11-17 14:16
Wake up, Monique! This is not anti-Jewish. It is anti-filth and anti-filthy rich. Any man who would engineer the collapse of the economy and walk away guffawing to himself and his friends while he buys up properties and sits fat and happy as everyone else suffers is a BAD MAN, regardless of his heritage and parentage.
 
 
+11 # fredboy 2010-11-17 14:54
Weill, Rubin, Greenspan--they destroyed our economy, our future, and did their best to destroy our souls.

Such creatures believe they own us. They certainly own our government.

May the wolves of Karma feast.
 
 
-1 # Ilya Shambat 2010-11-19 02:21
Rubin and Greenspan gave America its greatest-ever peacetime expansion.

It was destroyed by the corrupt Bush regime that was put into place through fraud and corruption and left America in the worst mess it's been since the Great Depression.

Your souls are dirtier than ever. And it has nothing to do with the Democrats.
 
 
+9 # Thomas Daulton 2010-11-17 15:24
Wasn't some joker in the comments section of this site running back and forth to every article about the upper-class tax cut and asking, "Who are these super-rich we keep hearing about? Name names, please."

Well dude, here ya go. There are a lot of super-rich people who are not gaming the system and buying up democracy at the expense of everybody else's misery. But those people are generally on board with the progressive taxation system. People like Sandy Weill are the ones whose lavish political donations and paid media mouthpieces keep "tax cuts for the super-rich" alive in the face of 150 million citizens opposing it.
 
 
-2 # rob 2010-11-17 15:52
What a joke! Weill, Rubin, and All the big shot banksters are merely lackeys for Rothschild!!! It is Rothschild who has Everyone "in his pocket", even Rockefeller.
 
 
+8 # ksw sma 2010-11-17 16:08
People who are commenting that we are becoming the laughing stock of the world are coming to this realization about 9 yearas too late. But it's not funny; it is too sad. Such a great country, which did try and succeed, to some degree, sometimes, in being true to its foundng principles-- once. Now no one even gives them lip-service, and when the President attempts to he is reviled.
 
 
+2 # Austin Loomis 2010-11-18 11:00
Quoting
People who are commenting that we are becoming the laughing stock of the world are coming to this realization about 9 yearas too late. But it's not funny; it is too sad. Such a great country, which did try and succeed, to some degree, sometimes, in being true to its foundng principles-- once. Now no one even gives them lip-service, and when the President attempts to he is reviled.


This. This, in its entirety.
 
 
+6 # Cynibunny 2010-11-17 16:17
.. we're still Fxxxxxxing peasants as far as I can see.

A Working-Class hero is something to be!

NOT!
 
 
+9 # Don Easley 2010-11-17 17:10
So what else is new? These guys have brought America to it's knees. They - along with wealthy industrialists, our elected politicians, and our Supreme Court - have stolen so much of our wealth while we sit by and do nothing - absolutely nothing! Their greed has put a serious dent in the prosperity of America's middle class, and there is nothing in place right now that can stop them.

Their Golden Rule: He who has the gold, rules!
 
 
+8 # Phil Klein 2010-11-17 17:28
Someday a book will be written about our times. The title will be:


MALICE IN BLUNDERLAND
 
 
+6 # Sharp Shooter 2010-11-17 18:29
One can only hope that there is a god. Hope he has trouble slleping at night. What was that noise?
 
 
+7 # jean beek 2010-11-17 20:23
Thank you Robert Scheer for reminding us of that history. when the flood gates were opened so that greedy people could rob us...and do it legally.
Jean
 
 
+3 # Nicholas Bodley 2010-11-18 03:54
We live with an exaltation of greed.
 
 
+3 # hasapiko 2010-11-18 15:22
Since its founding bankers have almost always controlled the US government. This was Hamilton's grand strategy. Read the history. Schlesinger's "Age of Jackson" for starters. The method today as always is simple: lend heavily to the government and donate heavily to elected officials. Doesn't matter if they're Dems or Repubs - all the same, as the past two years have abundantly shown. The government will grovel before its creditors and government officials will grovel before their big donors.
 
 
+2 # Ina Zec 2010-11-19 18:43
Something to think about. We have to be informed about it.
 
 
-1 # david rohn 2010-11-20 09:48
I m continually fascinated to hear press people and politiciansalik e blame corrupt bankers like Weill, and the head of Golden Sacks among many others, for ruining our economy and enriching themselves .
I guess I m just old fashioned: when I hear our current president and others blame 'lobbyists' for the mess, I instead think it s the fault of our elected officials, who take the bribes called 'campaign contributions' from any and all comers, and then serve them instead of the voters and taxpayers who are footing the bill.
In bribery, I believe the person who accepts the bribe (going against the public trust and their mandate as elected representatives ), is the guilty one, not the one who proffers the bribe: that s to be expected.
As long as we have third rate ethics and third rate standards we will have third rate govt, education and (in terms of those served and eligible)health care.
And of course it s led ups to a third rate economy too, hasn t it.
 
 
+2 # SchoonerScotty 2010-11-20 12:30
Don't forget, it was former Congressman Phil Gramm of Texas who created and pushed through the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act in 1999, which eliminated Depression-era laws from the Franklin Roosevelt era that separated banking, insurance and brokerage. He was also a cosponsor of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 that allowed the likes of Enron. Finally, he pushed the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000, which did not allowed for government oversight of derivative transactions.

I am sure that he must have lost some of the millions in "gifts" that came his way, due to the financial meltdown of which he was a critical part.

I have great concern for America - no one will pay more taxes, everyone wants something. The rich just want an exponentially larger amount than the rest of us.

The Republican Party deals in lies, and mistruths, and plays on peoples fears. What goes around comes around!

Obama, do what you and our Senate need! Damn the torpedoes!

We as a nation are running out of time - either we collectively wake up, and develop and follow an action plan, or think about moving to Australia or New Zealand!
 
 
+1 # elizabeth Barry 2010-11-21 06:17
We need a better press; we need them to give up on the excitement of ruining people through their personal peccadilloes and "man up" and focus on the systematic eradication of our economic infrastructure; to pursue through the courts the greedy destroyers of regulatory controls.
 
 
+1 # socrates 2010-11-22 13:52
And if you want to read the rest of this travesty of a tale of greed and corruption I suggest you pick up a copy of Matt Tiabbi's Griftopia.
In a more just, better, and honorable (almost perfect) world these folks would be prosecuted for out-right fraud.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.