Share
Email This Page
add comment

Goodbye Redneck Riviera

Print
Friday, 04 June 2010 09:20
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)

Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)

 

 

ust before his daily briefing Wednesday, Admiral Thad Allen, the President's military point man in the Gulf, had the BP logo removed from the podium. The White House apparently wants to distance itself from Bad Petroleum.

But confusion over who's in charge - BP or the White House - continues to reign. Questioned about whether BP can successfully shear off the well pipe in order to fit a cap over it, Allen answered "I don't think the issue is whether or not we can make the second cut. It's about how fine we can make it, how smooth we can make it."

As Tonto asked the Lone Ranger, "who's we kemosabe?"

"We" - that is, the American people and its representatives - are not in control of this. BP is in control. Yet BP has a long record of negligence, and it was BP's negligence that probably caused this disaster. So why is it in control?

If BP's attempt to cap the well fails again, BP says America will have to wait until August to stop the surge of oil into the Gulf, when BP says it will complete a relief well.

August is way too late. Since the explosion on April 20, the gusher has leaked anywhere from 21 million to 45 million gallons of oil into the Gulf. At that rate, the Gulf will be filled with more than twice that amount by August.

How do we know BP is using every possible resource to stop this? How do we know it's providing accurate information? How do we know it's properly weighing risks and benefits to America?

Politics is about to take over from policy in any event. Forecasters say the oil will probably start washing up on Florida's coast this Friday - not only threatening its fragile system of bays and islands, but also rendering miles of white-sand beaches unusable. The tourist destination that's been called the "Redneck Riviera" will be coated with thick black ooze.

If you think there's been a political firestorm so far, you ain't seen nothin' yet. Florida's beaches are crucial to its economy. In 2008, at least 60 percent of vacation spending in Florida occurred in beachfront cities. Florida's economy is central to its politics. And Florida's politics is - well, think back on the last several presidential elections.

The President is proposing to roll back billions of dollars in tax breaks for the oil companies. He's appointed a commission to find out why BP's well blew.

But unless or until he takes charge - putting BP's U.S. subsidiary under temporary receivership, forcing BP to use all its available resources and submit itself to full federal oversight and control - his own presidency is in danger of being tarred by the same thick gunk that's about to wash up on the Redneck Riviera.

 

Open Article On Originating Site

Robert Reich is Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written twelve books, including "The Work of Nations," "Locked in the Cabinet," and his most recent book, "Supercapitalism." His "Marketplace" commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.

 

Comments  

 
+18 # Guest 2010-06-04 09:30
The current administration just doesn't get it. But they will. If Obama does not get re-elected, it will be almost solely due to failure of taking control of the gulf oil pouring into the ocean. This is not an incident, it is not crisis -- it is the worse ecological disaster in the history of the civilized world.
No other choice. You cannot ride the fence on this. To issue new oil drilling permit(s) in light of current circumstance is unforgivable. No one is going to care that it was for shallow water oil drilling. There is no nuance here. No shades of gray. President Obama!!! take charge or start packing.
 
 
+50 # Guest 2010-06-04 09:45
It seems to me they could stop the leak outright with an expandable metal plug lowered into the pipe they just put this cap on. Could it be they are more interested in making money off of this than actually stopping the leak?

And a question for you all: Just what is Obama supposed to do? Did the government have contingency plans for this type of disaster? Is there some agency in place that was designed to jump in and save the day in the event of a worst case scenario? Thanks to the republicans we have underfunded government agencies while kissing up to the corporations and NOW everyone is screaming for the government to act. Well the reason it is unprepared is because we never put funding into being prepared in the first place which is pretty sad if you ask me.
 
 
+17 # cpolaw 2010-06-04 10:23
Obama is supposed to take charge. Finger pointing does not matter. This is not an issue of fault. It is a policy matter, therefore only politics matters.

I agree Obama is not at fault. It does not matter. This oil is going to stick to him. The sooner he acts unilaterally and without hesitation, the sooner he will save his presidency.

Nothing else matters.
 
 
-6 # Guest 2010-06-05 01:39
"Obama"- without question the most compromised President in US history.
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-06-06 20:39
Oh you bet! Compared to who, if I may ask?
 
 
+6 # Guest 2010-06-04 16:42
To answer your question; if i'm president, after 2 weeks of bp failures, it's time to realize that bp doesn't have a clue how to solve the problem. since several states are involved, Obama should have taken over then, and put All the scientists and other resources to work on this. not only has bp been clueless, but they have tried to shroud the whole thing in secrecy, and not allowing outside help to be involved. the more brains the better. bp is acting criminally, while Obama is acting stupidly!
 
 
-3 # Guest 2010-06-04 19:54
Pathetically, Obamaniacs keep asking "What do people expect Obama to do?" about the horrible gulf tragedy.

Let give you all one example of Obama-Salazar at-al failure to act: The San Antonio's zoo staff have offered to use their vast experience (tanker Valdez, etc.) and natural habitats to go to the gulf, help clean up pelicans and other birds and house them temporarily in our zoo's natural habitats. Yet, no one has contact them. Salazar puts on denim jeans and cowboy hat and walks around the gulf like a dummy saying BP is doing "everything possible." Obama tells the gulf families that he feels their pain.

Next we'll see Obama tell Salazar, "You're doing a great job, Sali!" (Remember Bush?)

Sad and pathetic.

I voted for Obama. Lately I really, really regret it.

Rodolfo Quijano
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-06-05 12:02
Before BP was allowed to drill, it should have had to prove and document that it had the technology and was prepared to prevent and if necessary, correct and clean up what is happening right now.
 
 
+6 # Guest 2010-06-05 12:39
And the agencies were REALLY gutted by the Republican Gingrich '94 Congress devolution. See Ralph Nader's very pertinent post here - http://digg.com/d31SXXp. Of course the whole ball got rolling with the Regan Devolution and Clinton's neoliberal assent and continuation-then the assault ("disembowelment" of many reg. agencies esp. oil&gas] by Cheney/Bush).
 
 
+12 # Guest 2010-06-04 10:08
Robert Reich for President!
 
 
+12 # Guest 2010-06-04 10:11
Immediately after the Cosco Busan spill when the ship hit the Bay Bridge and spilled a large amount of toxic goo into the Bay and onto the shores, thousands of people volunteered for clean up until the job was done. At first, we were turned away by the State agency in charge, but the volunteers persisted and got emergency training and certification to be on the beaches picking up gobs of tar every time the tide brought it in.

Why aren't we seeing the same thing in the Gulf Area. We see a lot of hand-wringing and wailing. We see tourists lolling and waiting for the great tide of oil. What I haven't seen are the efforts to set up volunteer training for clean up and reporting oiled wildlife to get rescued. Why? Why are those tourists helping out while they are there? Why are the fishing and pleasure boats all ready to put out booms to keep the gunk away from the shores?
 
 
+13 # Guest 2010-06-04 13:21
BJ Wilkinson, you are referring to a "spill". This latest event is an ongoing gusher. A gusher in the Gulf of Mexico, with much greater shoreline, currents, more varied coastline, and there isn't just a tide - there is a massive weather, tide, and current influence on the oil, not to mention the chemicals being poured into that Gulf.

You cannot just charge into the wetlands and marshes, soaking up oil and further trampling a damaged environment. How would you send volunteers out into the current attempting to scrape the oil off animals and the surface of the water, fully knowing the chemical dumped on the oil have caused it to sink and the toxins from the chemicals are being spread throughout the area?

There ARE volunteers, fishing boats, and "pleasure boats" out there trying to pull booms into place, dump sand to protect beaches, and all else that might be possible.

What makes you think there are all that many tourists?
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-06-04 23:01
BJ i'm a little skewed by the syntax but for sure i'd expect anyone who was planning to vacation there still go and get involved some how.
We are the Government and the pressure brought to bear by the people at the Bay Bridge eco-disaster is taking our country back in a meta sense.
The complexity of the situation would be best handled by having Gov ppl organize the public efforts - doing something even if it's wrong would not be propitious.
 
 
+7 # Guest 2010-06-04 19:32
Volunteers to clean up the shore are lined up from Louisiana to Florida. People are eager to help any way they can. BP is not allowing these people on the shores--though the shores don't belong to BP. They are also hindering reporters and news agencies.

Many people are cleaning--just without the resources required.
 
 
+15 # Guest 2010-06-04 10:48
Agree with Mr. Moore (his second paragraph). Interesting how those with no responsibility or authority to intervene have all of the answers. To paraphrase Mr. Moore's question: what is the President suppose to do: personally mop up the oil spill?
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-06-04 13:28
For starters, how about stopping the misuse of police and coast guard resources to prevent the press from accessing the area and reporting on the tragedy? We'd have expected this from W & Cheney, but from Obama?
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-06-04 19:36
It is BP--not Obama, who is preventing resources and access to the area.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-06-05 12:05
Maybe BP is too big to fail, too big to regulate. Simply because its bottom line is profit, and not regard for life, it has literally become a cancer on the planet.

Just like the financial crisis precipitated by Goldman Sachs, etc. (a cancer on our economy), this is a much bigger attack on the USA than 9-11, but do you think Obama should send troops to bomb BP's UK headquarters?!

Fundamental structural change is needed for the long term - who has the authority to outlaw multinational corporations and eradicate these cancers?

In the short term, perhaps Obama can rally the international community of scientists/engineers/environmental activists to find and implement a solution and (like Apollo 13) this will be "our finest hour" and not our biggest disease/disaster.
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-06-07 13:41
Reports indicate the police and coast guard have also been involved in denying access. Who do they work for?
 
 
+6 # Guest 2010-06-04 17:56
Quoting
Agree with Mr. Moore (his second paragraph). Interesting how those with no responsibility or authority to intervene have all of the answers. To paraphrase Mr. Moore's question: what is the President suppose to do: personally mop up the oil spill?


WELL! Maybe this is the opportunity to get BP to put millions of Americans back to work- creating various ways to handle the present problem and all those that are bound to follow. Build plants near the Gulf coast and make EVERYTHING imaginable to use in the water and along the coast.
 
 
-4 # Guest 2010-06-04 21:30
If necessary, yes, he should roll up his sleeves and start personally mopping it up himself...as if the argument against his failing to put BP into receivership and forcing them to put ALL of their assets into handling this matter had anything what so ever to do with your silly little comment.
 
 
+43 # Guest 2010-06-04 10:51
The Cheney-Bush administration place the wheels in motion for this debacle to happen during the Obama administration.

The CARLISLE GROUP & the Cheney-Bush OILMEN knew this was bound to occur, just like everything else that has happened under the cheney-bush cabal.

Lets not forget that republicans candidates & their
mouth-pieces frenetically chanted "DRILL BABY DRILL" during their attent to remain in office. It didn't matter where; inland, off-shore or way deep 25.000 feet in the ocean.

Forget not their failed wars' secrets! Even before that, that same bunch wanted to LEASE our ports to the arabs...IMAGINE these terrorists' producing countries managing the store?

BP stands for "bad politics, bad politicians, bad policies
& bed politicians.

Drastic Measures are needed NOW to create energy alternatives for Americans brfore we are forced to change the red, white & blue for gunk, sunlight, fire & candles.
 
 
+7 # Guest 2010-06-04 15:34
Response to Tom Moore, Dorothy H, Joseph Q.
It does not matter who caused this. The only thing that matters is what happens now. The general impression is that Obama has not acted soon enough or decisive enough. Obama is opening himself up to criticism that he will not be able to defend.
To Dorothy H. Yes, it would help immensely if Obama would put on some work trousers and start personally mopping up that mess. Symbolism and the right words are everything. Read what Churchill and Roosevelt did. It would also help if he would declare this a disaster; mobilize the USGS, he should be mobilizing a national guard unit to help, he should begin receivership or seizure of BP assets, he should already have arranged for thousands at the shores of Florida's west coast (and of course other places). There is much to do. I could print a laundry list of things he should do. They do not each have to succeed. It is action that these communities cry for. I will say more in a few minutes.
 
 
+11 # Guest 2010-06-04 23:16
I agree Clayton, BUT Justice protects Liberty...
It does matter who's at fault... what are you saying ... "move along folks - there's no story here just keep looking forward" ...
Without Accountability, all is lost.
The rule of Law must be primary and it must prevail in this critical catastrophe.
Capitalism is at fault first and foremost; Then comes the 'Dirty Cops' known as MMS Mineral Management Services. Dirty Cops are worse than the filth they succor and sleep with.
Nationalize the Energy Industry/Cartel NOW.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-06-04 23:07
Well said Joseph Q. And we can't let 'them' forget the Dubai Port Inspections or Social Sec privatized ...
...but when you get into the Mix of Carlisle or British Petroleum or Bilderbergs these slime balls all sleep together. Neo-Liberals and Neo-Cons - Neo Libs are so much more insidious.
And BP is short for Chernobyl.
 
 
+39 # Guest 2010-06-04 11:02
What's stopping the Republican rugged individualist Gulf coast Governors from using their own funds or taxing their own citizens to protect their own shores? I was made to understand that they all decry the big bad Federal Government. They don't want their Federal tax dollars used for updating my Grant Administration sewer system, they can pony up for the preservation of their own coast lines.
 
 
+16 # Guest 2010-06-04 11:07
"Too Big To Fail" and banking was a breakthrough acknowledgment, an inevitable result of globalization and mega-corporations. BP is too big to seize in the present situation. Government has become too feeble a mechanism to control this complex and unprecedented catastrophe. We are facing a new paradigm wherein global consumers and the corporations that feed their appetites obviate the idea of nation and the supreme power of the state. In my opinion, a worldwide boycott of BP is the solution and something humanity needs to consider as globalization develops further.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-06-05 12:38
BP is the "third largest energy company and the fourth largest company IN THE WORLD" (emphasis added) Interesting to check out some background:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BP

Truly a new paradigm...making the idea of the US as a nation of the people, by the people, for the people kind of quaint and ineffective. However, what we've moved into is direct access, as with the internet. With worldwide recognition that oil is killing us, massive boycott - not just as a temporary protest, but a permanent abandonment of oil dependency - seems to be the best solution.

Thank Obama for recognizing this and championing the move to develop non-petroleum sources of energy.
 
 
+4 # racetoinfinity 2010-06-05 15:24
Not bad, but why not try to stop globalizaton further and put back in place responsible parties that look after the public and private good? Start with undoing NAFTA.
 
 
+17 # Guest 2010-06-04 11:26
NJobody is happier than the Republicans and The Teabag Party...oops...I'm being redundant....because they are sure this will end the Obama administration with one term.....their goal all along...and so stated by them!

Of course some of them HAVE suggested using a bomb on the oilwell to cap it!!!

Imagine!
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-06-04 11:26
I agree that this current oil crisis could sink the Obama presidency; but what known republican would do any more than this president? Seems to me that the greatest threat to Mr. Obama's re-election would have to come from a muscular primary challenge by an energized democrat.
 
 
+25 # Guest 2010-06-04 11:33
I am baffled that BP controls the cameras and the site. From the first day teams of scientists and drilling experts should have had access to learn from this experience and to constructively contribute. BP is focused on reducing their liability and embarrassment and therefore should not be in control.
 
 
+8 # Guest 2010-06-04 11:36
The Gulf Coast oil disaster is probably the best thing to happen with respect to the development and acceleration of alternative energy sources. If this is not a wakeup call for the Obama administration than I'm not sure what else can happen to change conventional pro oil wisdom.
 
 
-23 # Guest 2010-06-04 14:16
Eric S,
Your attitude, expressed "oil disaster is ... best thing to happen", is no doubt shared by many of the radical staff within the Obama administration. How many of those in charge have made your same calculation and decided to let this catastrophe grow in the mis-guided belief that Americans will suddenly reject oil. Maybe the Obama Administration’ s failure to respond is not incompetence but instead Machiavellian calculation. I won’t put it pass them to employ such eco-terrorism.
 
 
+12 # Guest 2010-06-04 21:37
Quoting
Eric S,
Your attitude, expressed "oil disaster is ... best thing to happen", is no doubt shared by many of the radical staff within the Obama administration. How many of those in charge have made your same calculation and decided to let this catastrophe grow in the mis-guided belief that Americans will suddenly reject oil. Maybe the Obama Administration’ s failure to respond is not incompetence but instead Machiavellian calculation. I won’t put it pass them to employ such eco-terrorism.


Good grief. People like you will say anything to avoid having to confess that the Republican drive to deregulate everything and the persistently irresponsible attitude that conservatives have toward the environment might have more to do with this crisis than anything Obama could have done. Obama's biggest mistake so far is that he keeps acting like a Republican plant than a Democratic President.
 
 
+40 # Guest 2010-06-04 11:41
And while Anderson Cooper is calling on more accountability on the part of BP, how about accountability from the other contractors involved, i.e. Halliburton?
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-06-04 13:31
What matters most is summarized by Linda Zoblotsky.
 
 
+20 # Guest 2010-06-04 13:33
mentioning accountability and Halliburton in the same sentence is an oxymoron.
 
 
+14 # Guest 2010-06-04 12:09
Where are the empty tankers necessary to suck up the spilled oil and haul it off where it can be separated from the water ?
 
 
+19 # Guest 2010-06-04 12:09
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com

BP paid workers $12-per-hour to show up for Obama visit, be props for the photo ops

By: Mark Tapscott
Editorial Page Editor
05/29/10 7:05 AM EDT

Has it really come to this? Yahoo News' Brett Michael Dykes reports that BP paid busloads of temporary cleanup workers to show up as stage props for President Obama's visit to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill cleanup operations on Grand Isle.

Dykes quoted Jefferson Parish councilman Chris Roberts who said "the overnight contingent of workers was there mainly to furnish a Potemkin-style backdrop for the event - while also making it appear that BP was firmly in command of spill cleanup efforts. New Orleans NBC affiliate WDSU reports that the workers were paid $12 an hour and came mostly from neighboring Terrebonne and Lafourche parishes."

HT: Examiner contributor Glenn Reynolds at Instapundit.com.

--
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-06-05 12:19
It's heartbreaking to see what a circus of ignorance is going on. How can people stand there and watch birds dying, covered with oil and simply take photos and walk away? How can people stage a show for the TV news, talking with gulf area residents whose livelihood/careers are right now being destroyed without brainstorming real solutions on the spot? How can the CEO of BP joke that he's got a Kevlar jacket so he's willing to be the lightening rod for all the outrage - instead of jumping into action to correct the horrors his company has created?
 
 
-30 # Guest 2010-06-04 12:17
10 Biggest Oil Spills in History. Surprise, it is not the end of the world. This BP spill didn't make the list. So don't go overboard and cease drilling, especially where it is closer on the Shelf. In your hysteria any significant increase in gasoline prices will wreck what is left of our socialist headed economy.

Here's a fresh article from Pop mechanics on the spills. And they forgot to mention Torpedo Alley, right off the NC coast during WWII. 452 tankers sunk in 4 months.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/energy/coal-oil-gas/biggest-oil-spills-in-history?click=main_sr
 
 
+23 # Guest 2010-06-04 21:44
How ridiculous can you get Flash. This oil leak hasn't ended and, guess what, it may not be on the top 10 yet, at this rate it's bound to become number 1! You seem to like contests. Would we, who are concerned about this disaster, be the winners if this one becomes the almighty number one?!!
And you worry about our so called "socialist headed economy"? You should get on your knees right now and pray that this becomes the case...though of course, it is not...because what our corporate capitalist system has done and is doing is killing us all, literally. This crisis and the economic melt down didn't happen because of a bunch of wacked out socialists. It happened because of the reckless runaway corporate greed machine that is determined to squeeze the life out of us, as long as that will bring a profit.
 
 
+24 # Guest 2010-06-04 12:21
Note that a lot of what BP has done so far involves protecting it's own ass for the future--and not trying to solve the problem itself; spraying detergent to break up the slicks which can be photographed from the air (making a lot of it form smaller globs), not letting the press get in close to record the mess, etc. Essentially wiping their fingerprints off the crime scene. Thinking ahead toward the court settlement cases.

They are aiming for cutting down their dollar amount for accountability as this thing goes off the publics' radar--as was done with the exxon disaster--and eventually politically limit (bribe) their liability via the courts (check up on how much the "settlement" on the Alaska mess was actually whittled down to!).
 
 
+10 # Guest 2010-06-04 12:29
I am not a fan of Obama but I don't get why he is getting blamed for this. He should have let BP try to stop the leak. They have the expertise that does exist and they are doing at least as much as the Feds would have been able to do. Okay, I understand perhaps Obama was not on top of the clean up in a hurry and I also understand frustration and the tragic cost here, but let's try to be fair
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-06-04 21:47
Quoting
I am not a fan of Obama but I don't get why he is getting blamed for this. He should have let BP try to stop the leak. They have the expertise that does exist and they are doing at least as much as the Feds would have been able to do. Okay, I understand perhaps Obama was not on top of the clean up in a hurry and I also understand frustration and the tragic cost here, but let's try to be fair


Your missing the whole point. The criticism on Obama is based on his not putting BP into receivership or seizing their assets in order to make sure they were doing the job...using those assets to bring the brightest and best minds in the world into this. BP has stood in the way of enormous expertise simply because they are more concerned about covering up their liabilities than they are in solving the problem. Don't think so? Well how can anyone really know if the government remains ignorant of exactly what BP is up to?
 
 
+27 # Guest 2010-06-04 13:00
The last sentence of the NY Times' feature story this morning said it all, "A BP official said the relief wells could be used later to produce oil from the reservoir." And THAT's why the oil continues to gush. BP won't do anything that would mean destroying their chances of access to this vast oil supply.
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-06-04 13:02
If Mr. Reich truly loves the gulf and southeastern coasts, and feels any anguish for either the people or animals whose lives and livelihoods are being wiped out by the oil disaster, he should refrain from referring to these areas as the "Redneck Riviera." This use of words distances him from real American people. Will Mr. Reich be donning a hazmat suit to help save the "Redneck Riviera"? Usually I applaud and enjoy Mr. Reich's comments, and I totally agree with the heart of his message in this article. However, we need every bit of unity we can get, to draw people together and force our country to make BP and the other moneyed interests whose behavior led to this spill really clean up their act. We need a paradigm shift, and that will not be effected by divisive language. Please, Mr. Reich, remember that this is our country, and it is owned by all of us; just because it is not in the backyard of an Ivy League school does not make it any less valuable, desirable, or worthy of respect.
 
 
-2 # Guest 2010-06-04 14:18
I agree. If Mr. Reich chose the headline for this, and he may not have, it was a very poor choice of wording.
 
 
+13 # Guest 2010-06-04 16:11
Red Neck Rivera is such a popular name for the Emerald Coast you can find many references to it if you Google it. Robert
didn't make that name up. Where have you been?
 
 
+12 # Guest 2010-06-04 17:06
Maryinst.louis
We here on the Redneck Riviera call it that. It's a term of endearment.
 
 
+10 # Guest 2010-06-04 17:24
Ahem, excuse me, I consider myself redneck bred (from Florida no less), "real American people" and see no insult whatsoever in calling that area the Redneck Riviera. True rednecks take great pride in this designation. Why would it be considered an insult? Our skins are a heck of a lot thicker than that! lol
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-06-04 21:52
Mary, you are entirely over-reacting. I've lived on the Redneck Riviera in the past, though I am a northerner, and heck, most folks I know in my neighborhood there would laughingly agree! If you're aware of Jeff Foxworthy, you'll learn that being a Redneck is no big thing. Self deprecating humor never is and though Reich, who is not a Redneck, uses the term "Redneck Riviera", he didn't invent the phrase I'm quite positive.
So ask a redneck sometime if he or she is offended. If so, maybe I'm wrong myself. Me, I'm a Yank and you can call me that all you want.
 
 
+10 # Guest 2010-06-04 13:25
President Obama take charge?
What do you suggest that he do?
What resources does he have at hand to better deal with the problem than BP?
Someone tell me how you would suggest that Obama stop the flow of oil within the next two weeks!
 
 
+8 # Guest 2010-06-04 21:59
Quoting
President Obama take charge?
What do you suggest that he do?
What resources does he have at hand to better deal with the problem than BP?
Someone tell me how you would suggest that Obama stop the flow of oil within the next two weeks!


Well glad you asked. You should read the article by the way because a remedy IS suggested, although I don't recall a 2 week deadline being mentioned.

First, by Executive Decree he can direct that BP be placed in a receivership or have their assets seized and sold to pay for repairs.

Second, by putting BP in receivership, he can force BP to permit the vast wealth of expertise that BP is locking out, in, so that the problem can also be involving the best and brightest globally.

We should NOT have to take BP's word for it that they are doing everything they can to protect the best interests of the public. They, as a corporate entity, are not made for this purpose and probably wouldn't know how.
 
 
-5 # Guest 2010-06-04 13:42
As a progressive & life long resident of the Gulf Coast, I have to register my disappointment with Mr. Reich's "redneck riviera" phrasing, "known as" notwithstanding . "Known" by whom? My Italian American family went for weekend getaways on the beach at Biloxi, MS, yearly, and none of us are rednecks.

Even now, I use sunscreen.
 
 
-3 # Guest 2010-06-04 13:50
agree that the term the author uses to describe this beautiful stretch of coastland is, well, ignorant. It also distracts from the issue at hand; cleaning up this mess. Where is the Navy? Isn't our Homeland Security being threatened? A retired Shell exec said we should be out there with supertankers, surrounding the spill and sucking it up. What gives?
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-06-04 19:53
It was reported earlier that Thad Allen said our military didn't have the knowledge or manpower to handle this--

I'm not sure I believe this. But, that was the news report
 
 
+13 # Guest 2010-06-04 14:09
From what I understand, after the Exxon Valdez disaster, Congress passed a law saying that in the future, all responsibility was placed on the oil company. In the opening days of the spill, that directive was followed, until it became obvious that BP was not doing it, and the administration had to step in. It took twenty years for the Exxon people to pay for the damage they caused, I hope it doesn't taken that long for BP to pay what they owe.
 
 
+18 # Guest 2010-06-04 15:01
Tom Moore asked, what can the president do? Chris Mathews is a blowhard; but he made a suggestion worth considering. Roosevelt started the public work corps.
Obama could appeal to a lot of the younger people out of work to sign up for working in the golf region. He can inspire people. Why not make it a national cause. It IS for it will certainly affect all of us in many ways.


It is too easy to get people worked up against something or somebody. We should try to be FOR SOMETHING and get together about rescuing our precious resources, our people, land and ocean. Let's do it
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-06-04 16:46
I don't understand why, in the midst of this disaster, and loss of oil and oil by-products, the price of gasoline at the pumps is decreasing.
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-06-04 23:43
It's the Capitalists convention to manipulate the market or Capitalism = the ZERO SUM GAME -
ab, they were CAPPING this well. Drill Baby Drill is an oxymoron. Oil, no matter where it's pumped from is the same price per barrel. Drill Baby Drill is the epithet of power not of necessity.
There is much more OIl in the Bakken and Willetson basins of Eastern Montana and Western North Dakota than all of discoveries in the US... Enuff Oil by some analysts to last 100 years at current consumption... Even if that view is 1/2 right - why aren't the Oil companies on the Red Neck high plains 'Doing the Drill Baby'? Where the land is not nearly as fragile as all the worlds Sea Water?
 
 
+6 # Guest 2010-06-04 16:47
What I posted earlier elsewhere re comments on the miserable oiled-bird photo:

Enough already! Do exit your car and stop pointing fingers at everyone else. As it stands, thanks to our plasticized, gas-guzzling all-American lifestyle, the oil industry is fresh out of "easy oil" worldwide. Now it's untested technology boldly going where consumers demand and Government enables (what politician doesn't know you'll get your cheap gasoline "fix" or run him/her out of office?) If you still want to throw punches at the White House, though, aim at the "DRILL, BABY, DRILL" de-regulating Republicans from Reagan through the Bushes. Fellow Americans, YOU are the the oil-a-holic champions of the globe. You're #1. China, at #2, uses one fourth the oil we do per capita. USING LESS CAN BE DONE. And why should you "suffer" such a drastic change? To save one bird. One earth. Overconsumption of oil products is the real story here, isn't it.
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-06-04 22:07
Way too great an oversimplificat ion Chrislange. The energy market is dominated by corporate forces that work tirelessly to influence the public perception of what is available, what is desirable and what is best. I too want to blame the public at times for drinking the koolaide, but the problem is that humans are hungry for energy and they are grasping for what is put out there for them to have. The fact is, the public has a hard time acting responsibly when they are so poorly informed of vastly superior alternatives that our corporate owned media does everything it can to lie about. I shouldn't have to be an energy engineer to figure out what forms of energy technology are actually best so I rely on information from the experts, experts who for the most part, are on someone's corporate payroll.

The shame of it all is that we could consume energy just as much as we do with only a fraction of it coming from oil, and more, but you won't get this truth in the media.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-06-04 16:56
If they can't stop the leak why not form an old-fashioned bucket brigade from the site to shore using super tankers and siphons instead of buckets? Then sort out the sea water and oil on land. Won't get it all but should capture a good deal.
 
 
+16 # Guest 2010-06-04 16:57
Obama???
Look folks, it was Bush, Clinton, Bush and drill baby drill. The fact is that NOBODY KNOWS WTF TO DO! Three simple rules for life on earth for all citizens:
1. Don't "do" what you can't "undo".
2. If you violate rule one, get out of the way.
3. If you violate rules 1 and 2 then you should go to JAIL CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY!

Let's face it folks, it's one big system and if you screw it up here, it's gonna be screwed up everywhere! Where are the other countries? March BP to the world court and try them with the rest of the human beings that act with callous disregard for their fellow humans.
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-06-04 18:09
Read the Law of the Sea Convention and tell me if it applies?
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-06-04 18:07
It would be helpful if someone could tell me what can be done about an incident that happened 50 miles from the nearest American shore. I can not understand fully what the Law of the Sea Convention means in relation to our government. What can we do, PULL OUT OUR BIG GUNS AND TALL SHIP AND START A WAR? That, of course, is what America know how to do.
 
 
+7 # Guest 2010-06-04 19:39
We need renewables NOW, we needed them YESTERDAY.

The sooner we start boycotting oil in every way, shape or form that our resources permit, the sooner we stop being part of this ongoing murder of our peoples and our planet.
All those hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of thousands of human beings killed just this decade, for oil, haven't woken us up. So will this?

But what can we do? ...take the bus...eat and buy locally produced items...conserve energy...but it is hopeless, we are so dependent on our vehicles...what can we do to really get away from oil? I'm sure joe six pack still wants to drive his hummer, but I'M READY! NO MORE ENSLAVEMENT TO OIL!

We are desperately in need of leadership.
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-06-04 19:44
IMHO, the crude oil should be allowed to float to the surface (undispersed), and cordoned off with recovery ships sucking it in and transporting to a refinery. Grab it wherever it appears.

I'm not sure we want college kids from wherever out there "volunteering', even at $12/hr. That goo is TOXIC, and kills life forms. Its already made many very sick. There are lots of boats out there already, Skimmers and recovery boats from around the world should be asked to converge in the Gulf, as should scientists and free journalists.

This has become an event of international proportions - so any "control" becomes spotty.

It does go back to BP exec's over ruling the drill crew and insisting that they press forward when the bad incident (explosion) occurred. From there the liability began. Read the reports from a month ago.
 
 
+7 # Guest 2010-06-04 19:51
We've got to boycott oil.

How many innocent lives lost this decade...for oil?

Our system is set up so that we are literally enslaved to oil. Most of us have no way to take mass transit to work, or to boycott oil in any way.

But we must. We must find a way to boycott oil. We need renewables now, but even more than that, we need to stop the wars and killing, stop the madness.
 
 
-8 # Guest 2010-06-05 05:54
Robert Reich reveals his bigotry just with the title of this article. And if you have ever met him, you'd know what a
holier-than-thou condescending little man
he typically tends to be. Like the very
people in government he now critiques, he
believes himself to be better than other people, and sets himself upon a pedestal.
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-06-05 06:29
I feel offended by the term "Redneck Riviera." Perhaps so, to those who live in luxury in the South of France and Monaco, but it seems too unkind a reference, which might be far too easily misconstrued.
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-06-05 11:40
The point that the Obama administration should take over BP American operations is well taken, perhaps just in the Gulf would suffice.

There is precedence for this. In the summer of 1950 Harry Truman had the Army take over the railroads threatened with a crippling strike, and later that year did as much for the Steel Industry, in order to protect National Interests, most particularly the "police action" in Korea. This took guts, especially as he was close to labor, and helped cement his reputation as a "near" great President.

I am afraid gut check time for the Obama Administration has come and gone. Unfortunately our Emperor has no clothes.
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-06-05 12:08
Our beaches and wetlands are world treasures, and big oil, the industry that owns Congress and the White House, is about to kill them. And the president I supported sits on his well-spoken ass for a month and does little. I wrote to him when he came out for drilling, warning that any future spill would be an Obama spill. I had no idea it would happen so quickly. I also suggested early that he summon the nation's and world's best scientific and engineering minds to solve the problem--he finally did, after several weeks of political hesitance. In crisis a president has to set aside political thinking for best strategic thinking and action. In this case, the president and government failed us, and we will never forget it. And in failing us, they have fed the anti-government hatred of the radical right.
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-06-05 12:47
Right, and the anti-government hatred (some irrationality mixed in) is used by the corporate plutocracy to gut government regulations further and further and suck money out of the world's resources/economy for themselves (the corporacratic "elite") and leave an elite wealthy class and a lower-middle to lower class very large, just getting by, and polluted.
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-06-05 14:14
Why is BP being allowed to handle this at all? Why would they want the added liability? Wouldn't it make sense to ban them from the region. Order them, by court order, Congressional mandate or whatever to cover the costs and contract one of the major oil production companies with experience to cap it and perform the cleanup. Heck, I hear that Exxon and Citgo are both available in the area.
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-06-05 14:19
Obama is doing as well as anybody could do.

There is no way that anybody other than BP can deal with the actual leak. The government does not have the equipment or the experience with leaks in oil drilling equipment a mile deep in water.

We do know that Steven Chu and some of the best engineers in this country are trying to figure out how to stop the oil. If it can be done, they will figure out how.

In the meantime, STOP BEATING UP ON OBAMA! He's doing the best anybody could do.
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-06-05 20:23
Apparently this is the biggest containment/cleanup effort in history. I have never heard in an impartial authoritative summary, a listing of the number of ships, personnel, miles of boons, etc. now in operation, and planned. I know it's in the many thousands already. It's probably not enough but let's give credit where credit is due.
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-06-06 07:00
"How do we know BP is using every possible resource to stop this? How do we know it's providing accurate information? How do we know it's properly weighing risks and benefits to America?"

This is a horrible state of affairs. However, as a journalist, I would hope RR could find the answers to these questions by interviewing people who have this knowledge, instead of spreading fear and frustration. Go to the chairman of a university's petroleum engineering department and find out the answers and help to education the American people and the world to the difficulties, dangers and time lines involved in drilling deep water oil wells.
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-06-06 08:37
Isn't it pathetic that BP spends at least $50 Million on a media campaign and $50 billion dividend issuance to minimize the affects of its careless acts, it lobbies government to under-report the daily flow of oil from the spill so the fines will be lower and the results of years of deregulation and laissez faire heap misery on wild life and entrepreneurs from TX to FL and potentially the shores of the Atlantic..............................................

So many reactions........................................................................................................how should we react, how should we feel, have we no indignation?
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-06-06 18:11
Criminal charges should be filed against those responsible at B.P.

This disaster has global consequences. Geologists have known since at least the 70's that fluid displacements under the earth's surface have the potential to create shifts of soil and rock and even tectonic plates, contributing to increased earthquake and volcanic activity.
We have technologies that can be used both in the capping the well and cleanup; however the will to use them is either lacking or thwarted. When I asked a friend, (retired military) why the oil eating microbes weren't being used for the clean up, he suggested that although proven effective, there is fear they would invade and destroy our oil reserves stored in the salt mines in LA. But all that oil would only last about 45 days. That seems a paltry amount compared to the unending Gulf gusher
This catastrophe is a wake up call to each of us to do whatever we can to work for the good of the planet and all creatures living on it.
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-06-07 15:23
Thank you, quite fervently, for finally pointing out what Obama or the government could do to "force" BP not just to behave but to pay attention. I am so weary of writing to otherwise intelligent writers (Frank Rich, et al.) who want to berate the president for "not taking over" - taking over what? Especially since BP has stopped just short of refusing to appear before Congress (a la Bush-Cheney - no appearance without holding hands). My heart broke when they forbade scientists or naturalists from saving more wildlife (and by extension all of us) and refused to let anybody else (except "our" subcontractors) to either appraise the damage or to act more precipitously to do something. I am happy (kinda) to know what legal means are available. I am also tired of hearing about FDR (my parents' idol) - after the past few years, I could take over the banks or the Supreme Court!! But taking over oil cleanup, uh-uh - is there really enough force in government depts. to force BP to do what they should?
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.