Share
Email This Page
add comment

Obama Starting to Assert Himself in the Gulf

Print
Sunday, 13 June 2010 20:04
Portrait of a pensive President Barack Obama in the oval office, 06/10/10. (photo: John Shinkle/Politico)

Portrait of a pensive President Barack Obama in the oval office, 06/10/10. (photo: John Shinkle/Politico)

 

 

Reader Supported News | Perspective

t's not clear if BP has run out of gas, or if the Obama administration has run out of patience, or both, but one thing is clear, the White House is showing a much more hands-on approach to managing the oil spill disaster in the Gulf of Mexico.

As worst-case-scenario estimates for oil leaked into the Gulf of Mexico from the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill approach 100 million gallons (5 to 10 time the size of the Exxon Valdez spill), there now appears to be a growing sense of resolve on the part of the White House and the Coast Guard that saving the Gulf may be up to them.

Nonetheless, one problem for which there is no current solution is that the United States of America has no capacity to repair a broken pipe a mile beneath the sea. BP has better equipment than the US government, but thus far, not good enough. Worthy of note is that none of this was adequately taken into consideration at the time the decision to drill for oil at such depths was made. Oil dependence having reached addictive proportions, we have relegated good judgment to the back burner.

Evidence of the depth of our dependence on corporate energy is on full display with politicians like Louisiana Senator Mary Landrieu calling for renewed drilling even as the worst environmental disaster in US history rages with no end in sight. It is an abject lesson in how far the concept of "live for today" can be taken.

There are three signs of life from the Obama administration that may signal a greater willingness to take control of the situation in the Gulf.

Obama has proposed that BP would set aside billions of dollars in a trust fund to address the claims of those affected by the disaster. It's a bold move, and if Obama succeeds Gulf residents will fare far better than the victims of the Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska.

Coast Guard Admiral Thad Allen, who has appeared up until now only nominally in command of the situation, has now at least a drawn a line - however faint - in the sand of the Gulf beaches. On Friday, Allen issued a 48-hour deadline for BP to come up with another, more aggressive plan, for stopping the flow of oil into the Gulf. At least we will have the opportunity to see what Admiral Allen will do on Monday morning if a plan is not in place.

Obama appears to have experienced a personal moment of transcendency on America's energy future. In three short months he has gone from a seeming acceptance of the drilling status quo with his approval of new drilling along the Atlantic seaboard, to a somber rededication of his presidency to finding a "new way of doing business when it comes to energy."

This week Obama will travel for the third time to the Gulf of Mexico. If he is ever going to, as Spike Lee suggested, "Go off," this may be the moment.


Marc Ash was formerly the founder and Executive Director of Truthout, and is now founder and Editor of Reader Supported News.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

 

Comments  

 
+7 # Guest 2010-06-13 21:31
The BP catastrophe seems destined to kill the Gulf of Mexico. If we do not learn something from this we deserve what comes afterwards.
 
 
+8 # Guest 2010-06-13 22:08
IT CAN BE EXPECTED THAT MEXICO AND ITS AFFECTED BUSINESSES AND CITIZENS WILL PUT FORTH THEIR RIGHTFUL CLAIMS FOR RESTITUTION AS WELL. THE "STRONG ARM" OF THE U.S. ADMINISTRATION SHOULD TAKE THIS INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN DELIBERATING HOW MUCH B.P. SHOULD COUGH UP NOW AND ULTIMATELY FOR ITS CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE.
 
 
-3 # MitchelCohen 2010-06-13 23:20
Unfortunately, Obama seems more concerned about shutting down the flow of information than the flow of oil.

A number of new regulations and laws are in the works that would criminalize the use of satellite photos, for example, of the extent of the "spill".

Mitchel Cohen
Brooklyn Greens / Green Party
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-06-14 10:57
Can you post a link to information online about this? I'd be interested in details. Thanks
 
 
+1 # Bob-Investigates 2010-06-14 01:16
I have proposed to Transocean and some politicans, plus 1,000's of former members of the U.S. Navy a "fix" for this wellhead leak: take an appropriately sized old ship and place it in drydock. Cut a hole in the bottom of the hull and weld a rim around it. Create a passage (pipe) from the hole up to the top of the ship. Weld a plate with multiple pipe fittings at the top of this pipe and connect pipes that will carry the oil / gas mixture to surface ships. Seal off all other compartments in the hull, but attach pipes so that concrete can be poured into those parts of the hull after the ship reaches the bottom. That will weigh down the hull to keep it on the floor of the Gulf. I-beams could be welded to the hull to provide added stability. This idea came to me after reading that the "containment dome" they tried, failed. It was too small and too light in weigh to do the job. The ship (hull) for this fix only needs to be big enough to stay on the bottom and capture the oil/gas. Leak stops!
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-06-14 04:38
Let's see: if BP can do this it would take us somewhere into 2015 accomplising
this sci-fi solution.

You been watching too many blockbuster movies where to save the City or the world they destroy it.

ya betcha
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-06-14 10:53
Why is everyone assuming that BP actually WANTS to plug the gusher? This is THEIR gusher--and they intend to harvest whatever they can. Proof should be that they were willing to INCREASE the size of the blowhole so they could insert a pipe to salvage any drops of this man-made eruption--in spite of the fact that this move greatly worsened the catastrophe to all BUT BP. This has been their strategy from Day 1.
Yes, the "fix" proposed by Bob -Investigates sounds worthy. But it assumes that BP's goal is the same as ours . . .

.
 
 
+13 # Guest 2010-06-14 03:07
It has been pointed out, we got what we asked for by electing politicians who oppose regulation of businesses, letting them do whatever they want to make more money. Now we have the economy disrupted by Wall Street greed and the Gulf being killed by an oil well blow out. Will we ever learn?
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-06-14 03:28
Good idea, Bob! I hope that the Obama Administration has not "filtered" themselves so far away from ordinary Americans that an idea such as yours will be able to make it up to the officials who seem to be likely to take over this disaster.
 
 
+14 # Guest 2010-06-14 03:54
Why do we expect Obama to be a perfect human being? I think that we are seeing his potential for greatness, and taking that as who he presently is. It is unrealistic for us to want him to blow his top. That is not something that he does, and if he would try to fake it, he would only look silly. Why don't we accept Obama as he is, and work to push him in the right direction. He has the potential to be a great president, but all these attacks on him is weakening his ability to function. He is not Superman, he is a human being who has a very good heart. Give him a break!
 
 
+12 # Guest 2010-06-14 05:12
Brava, genierae! Your heart and head are in the correct place. We need and have a president who thinks before he acts, and sometimes that takes time proportionate to the problem.
 
 
-4 # Guest 2010-06-14 05:31
I don't know why the media is dancing around this matter. BP should be put in receivership and then criminally charged for environmental damage. There are several laws on the books under which this can be done. Not only is Obama a fraud, he is supported by the media, including RSN.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-06-14 06:04
I think BP does not WANT to plug its gusher. ("Leak" is a bad joke, at 30-50,000 barrels/day) ,but to CAPTURE it and pump the oil into its bank account, global poisoning be damned! A simple, old-fashioned way to plug the gusher: Using one of the U.S. government's two deep-sea drilling ships: Glomar Challenger (NSF & the Moho project), or Glomar Explorer (CIA), and commandeered technical personnel from BP, the following could be done:
1) Yank off the sieve cap now in place (capturing ~10%??-- ridiculous); 2) Run a drill shaft down, tipped with a small bit and backed by a large toggle bolt. Aim it into the well-head (the teeth of the gusher) and cut through the non-functional blowout-preventer (BP joke). 3) When deep enough into the existing pipe or rock below, open the toggle. 4) Using the toggle as an anchor, push graduated plugs down the shaft, centering, then plugging the well-head. 5) Bury the stump under thousands of tons of rock.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-06-14 06:29
In some parts of the world, massive damage to a nation's territory by a foreign institution would be treated as a act of war. Obama is doing very well.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-06-14 06:36
genierae: I'm with you (and Obama) on this. One big reason we elected him is that he doesn't blow up and get emotional and run off in all directions. He thinks. He considers options. I want him to stay cool.
Give him credit for all he has accomplished, including the health care reform bill--not enough, but a beginning--and with several other measures. He inherited a mess created over 8 years; he and his staff need time to fix gigantic issues.
 
 
+3 # cabotool 2010-06-14 06:55
America and Americans are headed for their graves in gas guzzlers and a "damn the consequences" attitude towards getting what they want. We are ruled by a majority of fools.
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-06-14 07:05
MItchel Cohen, What new regulations are you referring to and who is planning to introduce them in congress or what department is going to intstitute these regulations.
Please don't make general comments without backing up your statement.
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-06-14 07:37
The President will address the nation on Tuesday.Here's what he should say: "Unless you've been to busy watching Dancing With the Stars",Kim Kardashian or the NBA finals,you know we're in the midst of the worst environmental disaster in U.S. history.The Gulf of Mexico is rapidly approaching the time when we will designate it as a toxic waste dump.The underlying problem is one of "crude" addiction.Simply put,we're petroleum junkies,we send troops thousands of miles away to score our stash in some cases leading to death and injury amongst our our own people and grave casualties amongst the indigenous inhabitants of where we "choose" to go to war.The "dope" we do have in our own country is increasingly hard to get to and incurs risks to the environment that we are clearly not ready to deal with. I'm here today asking for sacrifice on the part of all Americans.We mobilized during WW11 in a matter of months.Don;t tell me we can't do it again.Are we gonna stay junkies,Oil flunkies or are we Americans?
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-06-14 08:07
Selma, are you actively getting those "laws" in the public eye so that congresspeople can act on them should they want to? My understanding is that Holder is doing some of the investigation into criminal acts that you are alluding to. Until these acts are deemed "criminal" we won't slap BP with much. I agree that we should throw the books at BP but we have to use the laws to do it.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-06-14 08:34
Sorry, but I'm with Spike on this one. Obama needs to let his Harvard training in the closet, and to let all of us who are sick of this crime know that he is just as angry. I think this kind of expression would defuse many of his detractors while showing the great majority of this country that he is HUMAN, and that HE IS NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE.
BP is a rouge, a shining example of corporate greed, that needs to be taken to the tool shed, then force it to use its huge reserves to take care of the victims of this preventable catastrophe. So, Mr President, LET IT RIP!
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-06-14 08:57
The total toxic effect of the MMS/BP concordant is catastophic. The effects of ruining the ocean bottom as well as oil fumes in the air ( and why aren't the clean-up people wearing masks) are terrible in the extreme. Are we all going to eventually pay for this with our lives?
 
 
+8 # Guest 2010-06-14 09:28
We don't need Obama to "Go off." We need him to Get the US off Oil (& other fossil fuels). Stop distracting the public with media-hyped irrelevancies.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.