The Big Lie: The Rise of the Extreme Right
A protester reflected in a store window, Broadway, Los Angeles, 05/01/10. (photo: Brian van der Brug/Los Angeles Times)
Reader Supported News | Perspective
rizona Gov. Jan Brewer recently said, "I believe today ... that the majority of the illegal trespassers that are coming into the state of Arizona are under the direction and control of organized drug cartels ... There's strong information to us that they come as illegal people wanting to come to work. Then they are accosted and they become subjects of the drug cartel." Brewer hedged her statement with phrases such as "I believe" and "There's strong information." However, she does not offer an iota of evidence - making it the most irresponsible statement that I have heard in my fifty-five years as a political activist.
The fact that Brewer equates an undocumented immigrant to organized criminals and members of the violent drug cartels is disturbing. With this type of misinformation by a public official, it is no wonder that over 70 percent of Americans support the repression of undocumented immigrants, believing that laws similar to those of Arizona will keep them safe.
History informs us that the Third Reich came to power as a consequence of half-truths and blatant lies that gradually made most Germans passively receptive to Nazi racial theories. The parallels between Germany in the 1920s and Arizona in 2010 are striking. Then, and now, intentional lies have that spread fear and hatred of the other.
Who is behind this mass hysteria in Arizona?
A connection exists between white supremacists and the proponents of SB 1070, targeting of immigrants, and the passing of HB 2281, the assault on ethnic studies. Support has been built for these measures based on big lies and money that have formed the Arizona paranoia - further nurtured by four decades of immigrant bashing. A leading protagonist is Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce, who has taken credit for SB 1070.
In 2004, under Pearce's stewardship, Proposition 200 passed with 56 percent of the vote. The campaign was spearheaded by "Protect Arizona Now" (PAN) and sought to limit undocumented immigrants' access to public benefits and voting - requiring proof of citizenship when voting and applying for public benefits. Public employees were ordered to deny services to undocumented immigrants and turn them over to authorities. A failure to comply with the law could result in jail terms and fines. Arizona successfully defended Proposition 200 in the courts.
Emboldened by its victory over a coalition of prominent Democrats and Republicans, the cabal moved to intimidate legislators. Then, in taking over the Republican Party PAN made overtures to extreme right groups, and in 2006 Pearce sent his associates an article on immigration published by the neo-Nazi National Alliance to its base. The article accused "the Jewish controlled media" of creating a bias against whites and favoring minorities and Israelis.
Meanwhile, the core group strengthened its ties with white-supremacist groups, among which was FAIR (Federation for American Immigration Reform) - founded by John Tanton, a leader in the anti-immigration and "official English" movements. Tanton had close ties with the Pioneer Fund, a proponent of "improving the character of the American people" through selective breeding. PAN received $305,000 from FAIR and the American Immigration Control Foundation (AICF). In turn, the latter groups have received over $1.2 million dollars from the Pioneer Fund. In 2007, the Southern Poverty Law Center labeled FAIR a hate group.
According to Tanton: "To govern is to populate," prophetically asking, "Will the present majority peaceably hand over its political power to a group that is simply more fertile? As whites see their power and control over their lives declining, will they simply go quietly into the night or will there be an explosion?"
The Arizona groups' allies include self-described "ethnic separatist" Virginia Abernethy, who serves on the advisory board of the Council of Conservative Citizens (CCC), an organization with ties to former Ku Klux Klan Grand Dragon David Duke, and white supremacist and anti-Semite writers.
Pearce is also associated with Jason "J.T." Ready, who fronts United for a Sovereign America (USA). Pearce and Ready are allies of Sheriff Joe Arpaio. In turn, Ready is a friend of neo-Nazi Ernst Rohm.
Ready openly invites militias, motorcycle clubs, the National Guard, constitutional groups and the National Socialist Movement (NSM) to his events. The NSM is the largest neo-Nazi hate organization in the United States with 61 chapters in 35 states. Pearce has acknowledged his relationship with Ready.
To round off the equation, FAIR's attorney Kris Kobach wrote SB 1070. As for Pearce, he openly consorts with neo-Nazis who he has been caught on film embracing.
Where is Brewer in this quagmire? Actually, she has gravitated rapidly to the right, attempting to fend off the challenge of state treasurer Dean Martin, an Arpaio friend and clone. The signing of 1070 and 2281 paid her dues to the extreme right of the Republican Party that since 2004 has controlled Republican Party primaries.
Similarly, Senator John McCain has returned to the fold of the far right. In the early 1980s, McCain served on the board of the US Council for World Freedom, which supported the Contras' efforts to overthrow the Nicaraguan government. McCain alleges that he resigned from the council, which he said in 1986 "got some good people involved." McCain had opposed Proposition 200 in 2004.
Enter the almost all white Tea Party movement. They have given a shot of adrenaline to the right, and ironically, respectability to the nativist movement through the creation of mass hysteria. A mob without a center, they are easily manipulated by the zealots who have been stoking these fires for four decades. Minute Men, vigilantes, Tea Partiers, all stem from the same root.
Yet another player is Tom Horne, the state superintendent for public instruction, who is running for attorney general. Facing the rabid right-wing Andy Thomas in the primary, he decided to Mexican bash and court neo-Nazis, which is surprising because Horne is of Jewish ancestry. Horne, in order to make himself viable, has aligned himself with Ready, Pearce and the cabal of neo-Nazis. In order to attract attention, he is given to wild accusations about the highly successful La Raza program in the Tucson Unified School District, seeking to abolish it and all ethnic studies programs. Horne advocates censorship of books that he deems as un-American.
Adolph Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf (1925), "In the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods."
While history does not repeat itself, situations and tactics do. Undocumented workers are not drug dealers, criminals or a drag on society. La Raza Studies is not about hate, it is about pride, learning, and staying in school. Brewer and Horne know better, but it is easier to sell a big lie.
Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |










Comments
What our neonazis are doing is against basics human rights - see UN Charter.
And drugs? - go to cocaine Wall Street - and start arresting
Add the xenophobia newsmedia like FOX news garbage and bingo, it's ignorant arrogant brainwash racist American all over again.
Let's face it. With Republicans on board, the nation has sunk to a new level of disintregation.
It's going to take a miracle to return to a civilized nation again. The scare of their shadow (the Democratic Party) is waiting and sitting for the outcome. With the exception of a few yellow dog democrats, most of which are not in chairmen/women positions, can't do anything about it!
The Demos must insist of replacing the weak ones and replace those high postions with man and women of convictions and courage to confront the ignorance and arrogance that has become America!
1. they are a cheap labor source
2. they keep wages low for the American labor force
You are absolutely right. Big business has been behind illegal immigration for more than 30 years. Big business was preparing the American consumer for this for years. Remember they first started asking when you called them: "Do you want to continue in English? If so press 1." That is when they also started printing instructions for products purchased in two languages - Spanish and English.
But that traditional in US history, isn't it? When everything else fails, blame everyone else but youselves. Especially on election time, when these governors of these fail states are running for their political lives.
The majority of the U.S. citizens want the borders controlled and want illegal immigrants deported. Calling them names is not likely to accomplish anything other than offending people.
A reasonable solution to the problem would probably be a better approach. What is reasonable? I would say amnesty for long-term residents; biometrics ID cards and steep penalties for employers who hire illegal immigrants; and tough reinforcement of the border to stop this flow of people.
Or just keep calling Americans racists, and see if that works.
In Missouri several communities attempted to point out the employers of illegals but some of the right winged thinkers thought it was destroying jobs for others. Dah! You can't have it both ways. If you are serious about solving the problem you must take action and it has to be a lot better than profiling dark skinned people. I can't believe the blindness many use.
I think it's very foolish to dismiss Brewer's signature of this legislation as nothing. She had the power to stop it and didn't - instead she aligned herself with those of openly racist intent - that is NOT a small thing for a state governor to do.
The AZ law itself requires too much vigilance on the part of the police to vet citizens of a specific ethnicity. And the further laws being pushed as an attack on ethnic studies... basically all add up to a cultural attack on AZ's mexican or latino population. You can argue that it's about controlling the borders, but it's not. It's about creating a climate of eurocentric primacy and forcing others back to a second class status.
And that is indeed racism.
History informs us ...
The parallels between ...
A connection exists
... taking over the Republican Party ...
... made overtures to ...
... strengthened its ties with ...
... had close ties with ...
... with ties to ...
... all stem from the same root.
This essay is filled with unsupported claims. My only question is who edited / approved this prior to publication?
However, immigration and the changes it inevitably makes in our neighborhoods, in our government services, and, arguably, our crime rates, is not always good for those of us who live here now.
I believe that Arizona, unless subsuming federal powers not its own, has a right to control its borders. That is a fundamental right of any government and its existing citizens.
Should that control be exercised by prosecution of employers of those here illegally? A legitimate effort to control borders should not be at the expense of our civil rights.
Rodolfo Acuna's reply to demonizers of "illegals" itself demonizes all advocates of border control as "nativists" and "racists".
It has now come to haunt us for sitting our asses and watching these sorry individuals tear up our constitutions, democracy and justice. Hell, we even got five of them as Supreme Court Justices and the people of the United States can't do anything about it!
I think America's just catching up. Obama DID want America to be more like Europe, right? France is boasting about their computerized citizenship system that automatically determines who's supposed to be there and who's not. America has WAY better computers, we should have something like that!
Remember, the Arizona law doesn't just target illegal scum, it targets the corrupt employers who HIRE them, and the crooked landlords who SHELTER them. THAT puts the COMPREHENSIVE into COMPREHENSIVE immigration reform.
Besides, we have to present our IDs when we get stopped in traffic anyways, what's the difference?
We give our SoSec to BlockBuster all the time, and they never DID say why they needed it!
Same with hotels, airlines, car-rental, etc.
rac·ism (rszm)
n.
1. The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others.
2. Discrimination or prejudice based on race.
So, yes you are.
Germany, in it's mad drive for reform after WWI, put Hitler and Nazis in power with the promise that they were going to clean up the nation of anything that didn't look, spoke or sang like a German. After he succeeded in murdering not only it's very ill or deformed, he started to murder it's generals who didn't agree with the "Master" race, killed off the political oppositions, unions and end up murdering it's jews, gypies, slavs.
After he was done with the blood bath and Germans were on their knees with the Red Army destroying everything they stood for, the Nazis began asking for "papers" from the very people who put them in power in the first place!
In end, the Germans became subservients of the West and the east, Russia in particular, and a piece of poor old Adolfo Hitler's skull ended up as a paper weight on Joe Stalin's desk!
Arizona, are you listening?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsHi6_l1XzA
http://www.economicrefugee.net/tag/neo-nazi/
Only when you add the above factor, we begin the reason behind the boycotts, and lawsuits.
Basically, job-thieves in their OWN country at least drain SLIGHTLY less.
But seriously, we need some way to force Corporations to hire American, rather than paying wages to other countries JUST BARELY higher than their norm, causing inflation and basically FORCING them to leech off us.
BTW, when did America become the world's designated job-market?
What about the AMERICANS' better life? Or does that no longer apply, in our desire to be "equal"?
2000 Presidential election of Bush-Cheney by a Partisan Supreme Court, ignoring the August memo by Rice, Bush, and Cheney, the tragedy of the 9/11 attacks, destruction of the Able Danger Records- Afghanistan and Iraq policies of "Preemptive War", the continuing paranoia of the pandering political politicians and pundits of the Republican right and its "grassroots" arms' Tea Party Candidates and hate groups.
First of all, if they were "legal" they still would be working here, "hurting the U.S." The argument about taxes is spurious, since the wages are so low that the income tax would be miniscule.
Meanwhile, immigrant workers in the U.S. spend money in the U.S. Far from draining the economy, they contribute to it.
"Protecting the borders" is another political tool, scapegoating the "other" to distract from the real problem faced by working people here: the takeover of the country by the oligopoly.
Keeping working people divided against each other is just what they want. When you bash "illegals," you're bashing your allies.
After every Amnesty, though, 5 things have happened:
1.) Newly legalized ILLEGALS--not to be conflated with IMMIGRANTS--demand American-normal wages.
2.) The businesses fire them so fast they get Warp Disorientation.
3.) The NEW "citizens" are out of jobs too, so we have MORE unemployed.
4.) The new "citizens" finally admit that illegals steal jobs from citizens--Converts make the best zealots?
5.) The NEW illegals demand Amnesty too, since we gave it to the previous batch!
Also, you contradicted yourself:
If their wages are so low, how can they spend money here--AND send it "home"? They ARE contributing to the economy--just MEXICO'S economy, not our own! Worse, the money seems to fund the next wave of invaders, rather than foment reform!
It's not all about racism.
For most of us it's about economics and a reasonable resistance to having what we've earned taken from us and given to someone else. As soon as they loose their temporary jobs, they get on unemployment or welfare, and still send most of their checks back to Mexico. Ask your legal neighbors how much they send to Mexico every month, they'll usually proudly tell you.
RSS feed for comments to this post.