VIDEO: Michael Moore With Olbermann Blasts Gibbs
Michael Moore, appearing on Countdown With Keith Olbermann, 08/10/10. (image: MSNBC)
White House Unloads Anger Over Criticism From 'Professional Left'
By Sam Youngman, The Hill
he White House is simmering with anger at criticism from liberals who say President Obama is more concerned with deal-making than ideological purity.
During an interview with The Hill in his West Wing office, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs blasted liberal naysayers, whom he said would never regard anything the president did as good enough.
"I hear these people saying he's like George Bush. Those people ought to be drug tested," Gibbs said. "I mean, it's crazy."
The press secretary dismissed the "professional left" in terms very similar to those used by their opponents on the ideological right, saying, "They will be satisfied when we have Canadian healthcare and we've eliminated the Pentagon. That's not reality."
Of those who complain that Obama caved to centrists on issues such as healthcare reform, Gibbs said: "They wouldn't be satisfied if Dennis Kucinich was president."
The White House, constantly under fire from expected enemies on the right, has been frustrated by nightly attacks on cable news shows catering to the left, where Obama and top lieutenants like Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel have been excoriated for abandoning the public option in healthcare reform; for not moving faster to close the prison at Guantánamo Bay; and for failing, so far, to end the ban on gays serving openly in the military.
Liberals have criticized Obama and his staff for moving to the middle and bargaining on healthcare reform, as well as the financial regulatory overhaul and even the $787 billion economic stimulus package, which some liberals said should have been larger.
Just last week, MSNBC host Rachel Maddow described Obama political adviser David Axelrod as a "human pretzel" for his explanation of the administration's position on gay marriage. Axelrod had explained that Obama opposes same-sex marriage but favors equal benefits for partners in gay relationships.
Attacks from liberal political groups like the Progressive Change Campaign Committee (PCCC), which raises money for liberal candidates and causes, are also frustrating to the White House.
Adam Green, one of PCCC's founders, repeatedly blasted Obama for a "loser mentality" during the healthcare debate, criticizing the president and Emanuel for not trying harder to include the public option in the final healthcare legislation. The group even ran ads accusing Obama of ignoring the will of the millions who voted for him by courting the support of Republican Maine Sen. Olympia Snowe.
PCCC is now pressing Obama to nominate Elizabeth Warren, a hero to the left, as the first head of the new consumer protection office created by the Wall Street reform bill.
While visibly frustrated, Gibbs did not specifically name any of the White Houses's liberal detractors by name.
Green said in an e-mailed statement Monday afternoon, "When Republicans opposed the stimulus and when Joe Lieberman opposed the overwhelmingly popular public option, the president could have barnstormed across their states and demanded they support policies that their constituents wanted - but instead he caved without a fight," Green said.
Gibbs's tough comments reflect frustration and some bafflement from the White House, which believes it has done a lot for the left.
In just over 18 months in office, Obama has passed healthcare reform, financial regulatory reform and fair-pay legislation for women, among other bills near and dear to liberals.
Obama is also overseeing the end of the Iraq war, with the U.S. on schedule to end its combat operations by the end of this month.
He's also added diversity to the Supreme Court by nominating two female justices, including the court's first Hispanic. Yet some liberal groups have criticized his nominees for not being liberal enough.
"There's 101 things we've done," said Gibbs, who then mentioned both Iraq and healthcare.
Gibbs said the professional left is not representative of the progressives who organized, campaigned, raised money and ultimately voted for Obama.
Progressives, Gibbs said, are the liberals outside of Washington "in America," and they are grateful for what Obama has accomplished in a shattered economy with uniform Republican opposition and a short amount of time.
Obama reached out to the left - including through a private lunch with Maddow and other liberal commentators - earlier this summer.
In late July, Obama made a surprise video appearance, with an assist from Maddow, at the NetRoots Nation convention in Las Vegas, where the professional left had gathered to grouse about its disappointment in the president.
"I hope you take a moment to consider all we've accomplished so far," Obama said, telling the impatient audience, "We're not done."
The lack of appreciation or recognition for what Obama has accomplished has left Gibbs and others in furious disbelief.
Larry Berman, an expert on the presidency and a political science professor at the University of California-Davis, said he has been surprised that liberals aren't more cognizant of the pragmatism Obama has had to employ to pass landmark reforms.
"The irony, of course, is that Gibbs's frustration reflects the fact that the conservative opposition has been so effective at undermining the president's popular approval," Berman said.
"And from Gibbs's perspective, and the White House perspective, they ought to be able to catch a break from people who, in their view, should be grateful and appreciative."
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |










Comments
Joblessness? Timothy Geithner? DADT? Deep water drilling? No climate bill? Expansion of gov't spying on its own citizens? Joblessness? (I know I already said that.)
Ditto Jackie Mac
What Obama missed is that his political decision to "move forward" and ignore the crimes and errors of the Bush/Cheney administration was a GRAND MISTAKE. By not putting blame on Bush/Cheney et al. for crimes and failures, he allowed everything they did to end up in HIS lap.
Yes, the economic collapse was Bush/Cheney's but since they weren't blamed or held accountable, it is now OBAMA'S.
Yes, the failures (and crimes) of deregulation are 30 years in the making, but since Bush/Cheney and co were not indicted and tried, they are all now OBAMA's problem.
Gitmo, Afghanastan, Rendition, Iraq, DADT -- Obama could change those with the stroke of a pen. He didn't. He owns them now.
We can do this by saying "NO" on election day to the members of Congress who have been saying "NO" to the President's reforms.
The fact that he has bent over backwards to appeal to those in opposition should be our cue to action!
We should be joining with and thus, helping our President, NOT joining with his opposition!
The Rethuglicans only negotiate and then vote NO after you've compromised.
The first time they did that, he should have said, OK, if you're not going to vote for it, then I'm going to pull it back and make it something my people really like, and not something that was compromised FOR YOU, since you're still not voting for it.
He WANTED the compromises that the NO-voting Rethuglicans demanded, or they would have been out.
Without accountability, criminals and their agenda remain "reasonable" rather than discredited.
If Bush/Cheney and 1000 others had been indicted, tried, and jailed (when convicted) without any pardons or clemency, then each time one of their policies was mentioned, the Democrats could simply say... "You mean the one that convicted felon xxx put in place? Yeah, we're working on fixing that."
But no, it was all about NON-ACCOUNTABILITY for acts that were beyond the pale of politics.
Spot on. I am not sufficiently convinced that the Democratic Party stands for anything at all when it won't even consider prosecuting the most egregious historical crimes in our country's lifetime. They don't have the decency to be ashamed and are willing to overlook everything in favor of promoting an agenda that they are willing to compromise before even taking on the opposition who will vote no anyhow. I'm not voting. The argument for anarchy is obvious and compelling.
Not even remotely good enough. I'm sorry that you are unwilling to call him a coward so I'll do it for you. Obama is a coward and the Democrats are sissies. I'm not going to vote for sissies just like I won't vote for Rethugliecons. If he only had some stones I'd reconsider, but heck, the fact that he's an ideological eunich makes that rather unlikely.
I know, he only "UHS" between each sentence.
A responsible decision is not to humor the beast by voting for it at all. I'm tired of choosing the lesser of stupendous evils. Give me someone worth voting for or I won't vote at all. NO ONE currently in power is anything but a bought and paid for toady. I won't play games in a place where the tables are rigged. Plain and simple. Stop voting.
Yeah, that's the ticket. Drop out all together. Quit.
It's the Patriotic thing to do.
What drivel. This is exactly the reaction the financial "Wizards of OZ" (aka money, the corporate banksters) pulling the levers behind the scenes want us all to do. They want us so frustrated that we let those who DO SHOW UP at the polls determine the fate of all of the rest of us. Non-voters already outnumber voters by 3-to-1 so I fail to see how increasing the ratio of non-voters makes anything better. It sounds like a recipe for defeat and more frustration to me.
I'm with you 100%. Obama and the Dems are not going to change. To heck with them.
What a bunch of unappreciative ungratefuls, they there "entertained while vilified" under bush and now they dare to snarl and conspire against the only one who helped them, more than they deserve?
DE-FACTO FORMER PRESIDENT CHENEY'S daughter was a frequent Air Force One passenger parlaying to the cheney-bush cabal lots of manure and they keep their mouths shoot and their comments underground.
What else can President Obama do, that he has not already done for this bunch?
God save America SHOULD MORE OF THEM be elected to any influential position on this or any other administration.
As much as most decent law-abiding citizens hated the cheney-bush dictatorship, it SHOULD be resurrected to see where these malcontents are going to go with their BARKING woof, hoof, woof!
He's talking about the Ariana Huffingtons and others who make a living claiming to be progressives...and NEVER do anything but slam our president. LOOK...it's one thing to not always agree with the man but this lack of respect and distorted messages that they send out there week after week...just to create traffic on their sites....they're click whores.
Please....do some research ....before you go off...please
Gibbs speak of liberals ?....he refereed to professional progressives.
HUGE difference.
What have we become? Oh my!!
GO GREEN!!!
RSS feed for comments to this post.