Share
Email This Page
add comment

VIDEO: Michael Moore With Olbermann Blasts Gibbs

Print
Thursday, 12 August 2010 17:16
Michael Moore, appearing on Countdown With Keith Olbermann, 08/10/10. (image: MSNBC)

Michael Moore, appearing on Countdown With Keith Olbermann, 08/10/10. (image: MSNBC)

 

 

 

White House Unloads Anger Over Criticism From 'Professional Left'

By Sam Youngman, The Hill

he White House is simmering with anger at criticism from liberals who say President Obama is more concerned with deal-making than ideological purity.

During an interview with The Hill in his West Wing office, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs blasted liberal naysayers, whom he said would never regard anything the president did as good enough.

"I hear these people saying he's like George Bush. Those people ought to be drug tested," Gibbs said. "I mean, it's crazy."

The press secretary dismissed the "professional left" in terms very similar to those used by their opponents on the ideological right, saying, "They will be satisfied when we have Canadian healthcare and we've eliminated the Pentagon. That's not reality."

Of those who complain that Obama caved to centrists on issues such as healthcare reform, Gibbs said: "They wouldn't be satisfied if Dennis Kucinich was president."

The White House, constantly under fire from expected enemies on the right, has been frustrated by nightly attacks on cable news shows catering to the left, where Obama and top lieutenants like Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel have been excoriated for abandoning the public option in healthcare reform; for not moving faster to close the prison at Guantánamo Bay; and for failing, so far, to end the ban on gays serving openly in the military.

Liberals have criticized Obama and his staff for moving to the middle and bargaining on healthcare reform, as well as the financial regulatory overhaul and even the $787 billion economic stimulus package, which some liberals said should have been larger.

Just last week, MSNBC host Rachel Maddow described Obama political adviser David Axelrod as a "human pretzel" for his explanation of the administration's position on gay marriage. Axelrod had explained that Obama opposes same-sex marriage but favors equal benefits for partners in gay relationships.

Attacks from liberal political groups like the Progressive Change Campaign Committee (PCCC), which raises money for liberal candidates and causes, are also frustrating to the White House.

Adam Green, one of PCCC's founders, repeatedly blasted Obama for a "loser mentality" during the healthcare debate, criticizing the president and Emanuel for not trying harder to include the public option in the final healthcare legislation. The group even ran ads accusing Obama of ignoring the will of the millions who voted for him by courting the support of Republican Maine Sen. Olympia Snowe.

PCCC is now pressing Obama to nominate Elizabeth Warren, a hero to the left, as the first head of the new consumer protection office created by the Wall Street reform bill.

While visibly frustrated, Gibbs did not specifically name any of the White Houses's liberal detractors by name.

Green said in an e-mailed statement Monday afternoon, "When Republicans opposed the stimulus and when Joe Lieberman opposed the overwhelmingly popular public option, the president could have barnstormed across their states and demanded they support policies that their constituents wanted - but instead he caved without a fight," Green said.

Gibbs's tough comments reflect frustration and some bafflement from the White House, which believes it has done a lot for the left.

In just over 18 months in office, Obama has passed healthcare reform, financial regulatory reform and fair-pay legislation for women, among other bills near and dear to liberals.

Obama is also overseeing the end of the Iraq war, with the U.S. on schedule to end its combat operations by the end of this month.

He's also added diversity to the Supreme Court by nominating two female justices, including the court's first Hispanic. Yet some liberal groups have criticized his nominees for not being liberal enough.

"There's 101 things we've done," said Gibbs, who then mentioned both Iraq and healthcare.

Gibbs said the professional left is not representative of the progressives who organized, campaigned, raised money and ultimately voted for Obama.

Progressives, Gibbs said, are the liberals outside of Washington "in America," and they are grateful for what Obama has accomplished in a shattered economy with uniform Republican opposition and a short amount of time.

Obama reached out to the left - including through a private lunch with Maddow and other liberal commentators - earlier this summer.

In late July, Obama made a surprise video appearance, with an assist from Maddow, at the NetRoots Nation convention in Las Vegas, where the professional left had gathered to grouse about its disappointment in the president.

"I hope you take a moment to consider all we've accomplished so far," Obama said, telling the impatient audience, "We're not done."

The lack of appreciation or recognition for what Obama has accomplished has left Gibbs and others in furious disbelief.

Larry Berman, an expert on the presidency and a political science professor at the University of California-Davis, said he has been surprised that liberals aren't more cognizant of the pragmatism Obama has had to employ to pass landmark reforms.

"The irony, of course, is that Gibbs's frustration reflects the fact that the conservative opposition has been so effective at undermining the president's popular approval," Berman said.

"And from Gibbs's perspective, and the White House perspective, they ought to be able to catch a break from people who, in their view, should be grateful and appreciative."

 

Open Article On Originating Site

 

Comments  

 
+21 # Guest 2010-08-12 17:30
I'm sorry, we should be appreciative for what exactly? Gitmo? Rendition? Afghanistan?
Joblessness? Timothy Geithner? DADT? Deep water drilling? No climate bill? Expansion of gov't spying on its own citizens? Joblessness? (I know I already said that.)
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-08-12 21:43
Quoting
I'm sorry, we should be appreciative for what exactly? Gitmo? Rendition? Afghanistan?
Joblessness? Timothy Geithner? DADT? Deep water drilling? No climate bill? Expansion of gov't spying on its own citizens? Joblessness? (I know I already said that.)



Ditto Jackie Mac
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-08-12 21:47
Exactly.
 
 
+20 # Guest 2010-08-12 22:29
At least 90% of what you are complaining about did not start under this administration. It is laughable that you would blame Obama for the joblessness. The Bush administration did not create a single job and in fact were losing 750,000 jobs a year by 2008. Bush left every facet of the government in shambles and I think only God could fix the mess they left in this short a time. Yes, things could be better, but we don't know all the details and pressure put on the president behind our back. The NeoCons and religious nut-bags/Teabaggers are still there, and Republicans in Congress should return every penny of their salaries, because they have not helped to run an efficient government, and that is because they do not give a flying fig about the people of this country, they only care about lining their pockets and their friends in the military industrial complex gang and the banksters.
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-08-13 05:49
It is good to hear a rational voice, I agree with you completely. It is fine to criticize the president, but let's do it in a constructive way. I think that Obama's amazing persona, and his obvious potential, during the campaign, led many people to have heightened expectations of what he would accomplish. He hasn't yet risen to the heights that we thought he would, but we must be patient, and stop bashing him because of unrealistic expectations. Let's stand behind him, where we can push him in the right direction. And we should also expand our focus from only the negative, to include the positive things that he has done.
 
 
+15 # Guest 2010-08-13 10:35
What Obama CAN do is TALK a mean game. He can FRAME the arguments. He can POSITION the battles.

What Obama missed is that his political decision to "move forward" and ignore the crimes and errors of the Bush/Cheney administration was a GRAND MISTAKE. By not putting blame on Bush/Cheney et al. for crimes and failures, he allowed everything they did to end up in HIS lap.

Yes, the economic collapse was Bush/Cheney's but since they weren't blamed or held accountable, it is now OBAMA'S.

Yes, the failures (and crimes) of deregulation are 30 years in the making, but since Bush/Cheney and co were not indicted and tried, they are all now OBAMA's problem.

Gitmo, Afghanastan, Rendition, Iraq, DADT -- Obama could change those with the stroke of a pen. He didn't. He owns them now.
 
 
+11 # Guest 2010-08-13 06:12
Insurance industry bailout parading as "health care reform".
 
 
+7 # Guest 2010-08-12 20:31
The sound and fury-you'd almost think that the deafening noise level around the president is unbearable: airplanes, helicopters, Rahm, Gibbs, bankers, oil companies, missiles. Noise pollution is really injurious to reflective thinking!
 
 
-17 # Guest 2010-08-12 22:27
Don't you liberals worry your pretty little heads, Obama is going to take care of everything (the Pentagon, Wall Street, and Big Pharma/Health wants).
 
 
+24 # Guest 2010-08-12 22:33
I support the President, however, I think he has bent over backwards trying to woo the un-wooable. The recalcitrant, regressive, Republi-won't Party of NO! has no intention of doing ANYTHING in Washington unless they are dragged kicking and screaming every step of the way. I appreciate the progress made but it is a far cry from the CHANGE we voted for to repair the devastation done to us by "dubya" and Co. Wake up, Mr. President, your supporters are running out of patience. I'm curious to know how the 'shrub" was able to ram-rod his twisted agenda down Congress's throat but the Democrats are like deer in the headlights when the Republi-won'ts clear theirs. We wanted CHANGE, we STILL want CHANGE. Let's get rid of DADT, Tax Relief for the Mega-Wealthy and "VooDoo Economics put in place by the "me firsters". God help us if the Angles, Bachmanns and Boehners defeat us in November. Bring sanity and reason back to Washington before they succeed in sinking the ship altogether.
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-08-13 20:58
Dear billnbillieskid , to answer your statement: " Wake up, Mr. President," I say it is you who needs to wake up. The president said back on election night in 2008, that although change has come to America, he needed us to further help complete this change.

We can do this by saying "NO" on election day to the members of Congress who have been saying "NO" to the President's reforms.

The fact that he has bent over backwards to appeal to those in opposition should be our cue to action!

We should be joining with and thus, helping our President, NOT joining with his opposition!
 
 
+10 # Guest 2010-08-12 23:15
I am on the side of the President Obama. Trying to get anything done with the other side blocking EVERYTHING he has tried to get done is very sad. Where is anger toward that tribe of those who want our president to fail. The President is almost super human in getting what we need. What a list he had to do coming into such a mess left by Bush. Just maybe there in some misguided criticism Let's give credit where credit is due.
 
 
+9 # Guest 2010-08-12 23:43
Gibbs is that useless hopeless waste of space that shouts inane nonsense the loudest at the very core vote that placed Obama in office. If he continues with this nonsense he will alienate that core vote and we will have the evil suckers that caused the global financial crisis in in power again.
 
 
-6 # Guest 2010-08-13 06:02
Robert Gibbs is very good at his job almost all of the time. However, he is NOT superhuman, and he simply lost his temper. He had a horrible cold that day, and he, like me, was sick and tired of liberals who focus only on the negative. Obama deserves better than to be dumped on by those who are supposed to be intelligent enough to know that perfection is not possible in this present time. Obama must deal with reality, not some pie-in-the-sky illusion. Yes, he should be more forceful sometimes, but his whole persona is focused on bringing people together and so he keeps trying to enlist Republicans in his agenda to help this country recover. Its a flaw, I agree, but it comes from being a good person who knows that cooperation is the only thing that will save us. Give him a break!
 
 
+7 # Guest 2010-08-13 10:37
Total BS.

The Rethuglicans only negotiate and then vote NO after you've compromised.

The first time they did that, he should have said, OK, if you're not going to vote for it, then I'm going to pull it back and make it something my people really like, and not something that was compromised FOR YOU, since you're still not voting for it.

He WANTED the compromises that the NO-voting Rethuglicans demanded, or they would have been out.
 
 
+7 # Guest 2010-08-13 02:11
I really can't imagine why Gibbs and the Obama administration should expect anything resembling a rousing endorsement by the liberal majority that elected them to office. At this juncture, all of the so called landmark legislation enacted by the Democrats is so dismally watered down, compromised and insipid again and again, the real question is why we should even think of voting at all at the next elections. We are not actually represented AT ALL. But the Democrats do have one thing going for them: the Republicans will, as a matter of fact, make things even worse because that is all they do. Their concern for the general public is nonexistent. It isn't that the Democrats actually care all that much...their neglect is simply more benign as opposed to the unvarnished viciousness of the right. Well perhaps the public hasn't suffered enough yet to wake up to the fact they've been completely taken for fools. As for me, I won't dignify the lies we tell ourselves by bothering to vote at all.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-08-13 02:49
We should be appreciative of an administration that thinks things through. Yes, there will be mistakes, but come one, we expect Obama to solve some of the problems we brought on ourselves. My God, let's get real!!!
 
 
-9 # Guest 2010-08-13 02:57
If the "Professional Left" hadn't done such a good job of eviscerating Hillary in the primaries, and going into the tank for "Hope", we might be enjoying the things that Obama couldn't or wouldn't accomplish TODAY. He's a compromiser, and she's a pro fighter. In a fight with the kind of opposition WE have, give me the experienced pro fighter every time.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-08-13 03:25
Hillary is just another Clinton Blue Dog Southern Democrat. No difference!
 
 
-1 # Guest 2010-08-13 09:39
Bla, bla, blaaaaaaaaaaaaa
 
 
+13 # Guest 2010-08-13 04:29
Are you serious? Hillary would have compromised just as much or more. Bill got through the two terms by compromising all the way through. She would, as any politician would, have done the same.
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-08-13 09:17
Maybe we would've if she hadn't been so quick to jump on the illegal war bandwagon. She voted to support the farce of the invasion of Iraq solely b/c she thought it would get her right leaning votes. So maybe, if she'd demonstrated the slightest concern for what her base actually wanted instead of sucking up to the right (which gee seems to be exactly what Obama is doing but we should all march in lockstep I guess) - she might be sitting in the Oval Office right now.
 
 
-5 # Guest 2010-08-13 04:03
The men and women in the Obama admin. are fighting. They are up against the complaining far left and the unmoving right. There is no dream team that could be doing better. Hillary? What do you think the Republican white-male cartel would be up to there? Washington is all about compromise and dance. I trust Obama, Rahm, and the entire team. STOP complaining!
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-08-13 04:07
I keep remembering all what Obama promised during the campaign and get angry when he got in and didn't fight enough for singer payer, he ran after the Repubs. to much trying to be nice. he is not doing enough for the unemploted because he is out of touch . He said he is not far removed from the American people, give us a break! I don't wear $500 dollar sneakers like his wife does. How many of us can afford to send our kids to private school. He just doesn't get it that people are losing their homes, where does he think those people are going to bed now. CHANGE be damned!
 
 
+18 # Guest 2010-08-13 04:20
First, the facts. George W. Bush left one tremendous package of dung on the American public. Republicans want to perpetuate that dung as long as possible by voting against any attempt to clean it up. Obama, Pelosi and Reid have tried to advance an agenda that would improve some of the mess that includes two wars, destroyed economy, no healthcare reform, no regulation of Wall Street. The party of NO is solidly opposed to anything the Progressives try to do. If McCain and Palin had won the election, the nation and the world would be in a worse condition than it is now. Considering all of the above, we should be thankful for the brilliant team in office doing its best to make this world a better place. Quit bellyaching or the next election will put the no-nothings back in command. And those who threaten to be absent from voting are playing right into Conservative hands. Wake up!!
 
 
+7 # Guest 2010-08-13 09:22
Pelosi and Reid will impress me when they start demanding the prosecution of the Bush war criminals - period, dot. Pelosi lost me the moment the words "impeachment is off the table" escaped her slimy lips. If illegal war and illegal spying that amount to treason are not enough to start impeachment proceedings, what is? OH RIGHT - lying about consensual sex with another adult, of course, my bad. 'Cause we reserve impeachment for only the most serious offenses, wink-wink, nudge-nudge.
 
 
+8 # Guest 2010-08-13 10:41
Must agree MASSIVELY here.

Without accountability, criminals and their agenda remain "reasonable" rather than discredited.

If Bush/Cheney and 1000 others had been indicted, tried, and jailed (when convicted) without any pardons or clemency, then each time one of their policies was mentioned, the Democrats could simply say... "You mean the one that convicted felon xxx put in place? Yeah, we're working on fixing that."

But no, it was all about NON-ACCOUNTABILITY for acts that were beyond the pale of politics.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-08-13 17:08
Quoting
Pelosi and Reid will impress me when they start demanding the prosecution of the Bush war criminals - period, dot. Pelosi lost me the moment the words "impeachment is off the table" escaped her slimy lips. If illegal war and illegal spying that amount to treason are not enough to start impeachment proceedings, what is? OH RIGHT - lying about consensual sex with another adult, of course, my bad. 'Cause we reserve impeachment for only the most serious offenses, wink-wink, nudge-nudge.


Spot on. I am not sufficiently convinced that the Democratic Party stands for anything at all when it won't even consider prosecuting the most egregious historical crimes in our country's lifetime. They don't have the decency to be ashamed and are willing to overlook everything in favor of promoting an agenda that they are willing to compromise before even taking on the opposition who will vote no anyhow. I'm not voting. The argument for anarchy is obvious and compelling.
 
 
+10 # Guest 2010-08-13 06:52
The republicans have chosen to act like provocative bullies. The way to deal with bully's, one learns, is to out bully them. Caving in to a bullies will only encourage them further. Obama and the Democrats, by announcing virtually on the day they took power that they would not hold The Bush administration responsible for their criminal acts against our constitution announced their own weakness. That opened the door for the extreme elements in the republican party and our citizenry that the administration was cowardly and they attacked. OUr country is now closer to destruction of our rule of law than I have ever seen it. And I have lived through it all. Bill WWII veteran, survivor of the Great Depression.
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-08-13 07:28
The President isn't just fighting the party of nope, he's up against the corporate mainstream media and the entrenched and extremely wealthy power-elite. Under the circumstances, and considering the horrendous economy he inherited, what he's accomplished is impressive, if far short of ideal. I'd simply like to see him do a better job of making his case to the American people. That's the best way to drown out the incessant drumbeat of lies, slander and hatred he endures daily. He should, for example, be repeating daily that he oversaw the largest middle-class tax cut in history.
 
 
-1 # Guest 2010-08-13 17:12
Quoting
The President isn't just fighting the party of nope, he's up against the corporate mainstream media and the entrenched and extremely wealthy power-elite. Under the circumstances, and considering the horrendous economy he inherited, what he's accomplished is impressive, if far short of ideal. I'd simply like to see him do a better job of making his case to the American people. That's the best way to drown out the incessant drumbeat of lies, slander and hatred he endures daily. He should, for example, be repeating daily that he oversaw the largest middle-class tax cut in history.


Not even remotely good enough. I'm sorry that you are unwilling to call him a coward so I'll do it for you. Obama is a coward and the Democrats are sissies. I'm not going to vote for sissies just like I won't vote for Rethugliecons. If he only had some stones I'd reconsider, but heck, the fact that he's an ideological eunich makes that rather unlikely.
 
 
-5 # Guest 2010-08-13 07:40
I certainly agree with C. Price! The griping, critical, left (this includes Moore and Olberman!) need to think about the alternatives! Do we really want Boehner and McConnell leading the way? Face reality people! Staying home and pouting is not only juvenile, but counter-productive! I'm getting fed up with Olbermann and much prefer Rachel Maddow!
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-08-13 09:24
So we should just settle? Yeah, that's the American way.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-08-13 07:40
How patient should one be expected to be?! Clear through the prez's whole term? Obama appears, to me, to be more of a Hollywood celebrity type and persona than a "follow through for the people" type. He knows, instinctively, how to play his audience. I feel so saddened that he can so seldom follow through.
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-08-13 10:42
According to most, we must be patient until after the 2012 elections, but only for a few weeks, because then, Obama can't do anything as a "lame duck" and would be "risking the Democratic candidate's ability to compete in 2016."
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-08-13 07:51
What has Progressives so disillusioned is the fact that Obama has betrayed his "Hope & Change Mantra", and far too many liberal/progressives in the Democratic Party have given him a pass on backtracking on Gitmo and Domestic Surveillance, expanding wars in Afghanistan and Pakistan with Bush's Military Team, waffling on "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and Same Sex Marriage, hiring the very same economists who caused our economic collapse in the first place, not fighting for Single Payer and giving the store to the Pharaceuticals, and bailing out Wall Street instead of Main Street. It's as if all this is okay because it is Obama doing it and not Bush!
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-08-13 07:56
Mr "UH" Gibbs "UH" needs "UH" speech therapy.
I know, he only "UHS" between each sentence.
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-08-13 08:12
I guess I'm what they'd call a hardcore base. I've voted 99% of the time since 1972 and am a reliable D voter but Gibbs remarks were the final straw, I'm staying home this year. I have voted for social, environmental and economic justice but that is happening less and less every year in the USA. Yes, I know it would be worse with Rs in charge but in many ways Obama has let the Rs control what has or has not happened. He throws cookies to the right while telling the left no and to shut up. I have doubted that my vote really counts because the electronic voting machines are so easily hacked and manipulated but continued to think that voting mattered on principal. Gibbs destroyed the energy I was clinging to that got me to the polls since Bush was selected in 2000. So, Dems have lost my vote, $ and energy spent making calls, going door to door and getting others to the polls.
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-08-13 09:30
I find myself wondering which is themore patriotic thing to do, vote for someone I don't really support, or not vote at all. To me this is huge as I actually bought into all that yay rah America stuff, I actually *believe* it (feel free to guffaw if you like) and I actually feel responsible for all the lives and limbs lost so that we all could exercise this precious right, I feel like we owe it to them to stay informed and make responsible choices, otherwise all that death and loss was for nothing. But whaddaya gonna do when it seems the only responsible choice is "None of the Above"?
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-08-13 17:18
Quoting
I find myself wondering which is themore patriotic thing to do, vote for someone I don't really support, or not vote at all. To me this is huge as I actually bought into all that yay rah America stuff, I actually *believe* it (feel free to guffaw if you like) and I actually feel responsible for all the lives and limbs lost so that we all could exercise this precious right, I feel like we owe it to them to stay informed and make responsible choices, otherwise all that death and loss was for nothing. But whaddaya gonna do when it seems the only responsible choice is "None of the Above"?


A responsible decision is not to humor the beast by voting for it at all. I'm tired of choosing the lesser of stupendous evils. Give me someone worth voting for or I won't vote at all. NO ONE currently in power is anything but a bought and paid for toady. I won't play games in a place where the tables are rigged. Plain and simple. Stop voting.
 
 
-1 # Guest 2010-08-14 08:45
Quoting
[quote name="MK Canada"] Stop voting.


Yeah, that's the ticket. Drop out all together. Quit.

It's the Patriotic thing to do.

What drivel. This is exactly the reaction the financial "Wizards of OZ" (aka money, the corporate banksters) pulling the levers behind the scenes want us all to do. They want us so frustrated that we let those who DO SHOW UP at the polls determine the fate of all of the rest of us. Non-voters already outnumber voters by 3-to-1 so I fail to see how increasing the ratio of non-voters makes anything better. It sounds like a recipe for defeat and more frustration to me.
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-08-13 17:15
Quoting
I guess I'm what they'd call a hardcore base. I've voted 99% of the time since 1972 and am a reliable D voter but Gibbs remarks were the final straw, I'm staying home this year. I have voted for social, environmental and economic justice but that is happening less and less every year in the USA. Yes, I know it would be worse with Rs in charge but in many ways Obama has let the Rs control what has or has not happened. He throws cookies to the right while telling the left no and to shut up. I have doubted that my vote really counts because the electronic voting machines are so easily hacked and manipulated but continued to think that voting mattered on principal. Gibbs destroyed the energy I was clinging to that got me to the polls since Bush was selected in 2000. So, Dems have lost my vote, $ and energy spent making calls, going door to door and getting others to the polls.


I'm with you 100%. Obama and the Dems are not going to change. To heck with them.
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-08-13 08:17
The in-fighting amongst Dems/Libs/Progs is music to the ears of the conservative opposition.I recently left a Peace and Justice group in Calif. because the moderator of the e-mail list was demanding of ideological purity I felt to be counterproducti ve. Has Obama lived up to all expectations?Hell no!Is he preferable to McCain or the next spawn of Satan that will no doubt replace him?I think so. America is entering into its own,unique brand of the Dark Ages.People will look back twenty years from now and call these "the good old days."If fairness and justice for all were what was expected of Obama,a lot of people are ignorant of our country's history.Tell me,which f*****g President delivered those euphemistic pipe dreams to all the groups clamoring for them? We are empire.Empire's become empire's by being ruthless.Which one hasn't? Obama is the big chief of empire at the moment.We're probably lucky we're seeing ANY change. So while we all piss and moan,remember, total eclipse is around the corner.
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-08-13 17:23
DaveW. Maybe we desperately need that total eclipse. Maybe we need to suffer the consequences of our collective irresponsibilit y to the fullest before we finally learn. It's like a drug addict needing to hit bottom before they are likely to ask for help. Maybe suffering of manifestly greater scale is necessary to wake up the people and get them to act as if their freedoms actually meant something. You are completely correct to say we get pipe dreams. Reality is going to be such a b**ch when it finally bites.
 
 
-3 # Guest 2010-08-13 08:19
It appears as if the liberal-left and its first cousin the extreme-right are a bunch of "smelling-r----g eggs" placed on both parties' baskets wanting, demanding and blasting...

What a bunch of unappreciative ungratefuls, they there "entertained while vilified" under bush and now they dare to snarl and conspire against the only one who helped them, more than they deserve?

DE-FACTO FORMER PRESIDENT CHENEY'S daughter was a frequent Air Force One passenger parlaying to the cheney-bush cabal lots of manure and they keep their mouths shoot and their comments underground.

What else can President Obama do, that he has not already done for this bunch?

God save America SHOULD MORE OF THEM be elected to any influential position on this or any other administration.

As much as most decent law-abiding citizens hated the cheney-bush dictatorship, it SHOULD be resurrected to see where these malcontents are going to go with their BARKING woof, hoof, woof!
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-08-13 17:25
No disrespect intended Joseph Q but if that's the best you can do, you're missing the point entirely.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-08-13 08:26
Gibbs and the rest of the Obama apologists are deliberately misrepresenting the unhappiness of those who expected a lot more. As they well know, it isn't that he didn't get a Canadian style health care or eliminate the Pentagon. Blaming insurmountable opposition by the Republicans is a total copout. It is that there are so many things that he could have done by executive order that he refused to do that frustrates those who expected better. He could have recess appointed a lot of excellent candidates who have since quit trying. He allowed the right to roll him to often. He could have instituted some sort of requirement that banks lend their rescue money and to actually do something to relieve people with mortgage foreclosure. He didn't have to negotiate with himself before proposing legislation on health, stimulus, bank reform, etc. He could have required churches receiving government aid to refrain from using that money in a discriminatory manner. The list of similar actions is long.
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-08-13 09:24
Yeah, they'll catch a break when they stop kowtowing to the obstructionist Republicans and put up some REAL legislation like climate change to a vote to show how bad the Reps are to the American public! What if it passed by some odd chance?? Now thats what we worked and voted for! A President that takes risks for the public good! Not to coddle the Reps!! Stop your whining Gibbs and get some real work done up there!!
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-08-13 09:27
WHY DOESN'T ANYONE EVER MENTION THE GREEN PARTY AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO STAYING HOME AND NOT VOTING ? AFRAID THAT REAL PROGRESSIVES (FOR THE PEOPLE , BY THE PEOPLE , TO THE PEOPLE ) MIGHT CAUSE THE SINKING SHIP TO FLOUNDER ?
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-08-13 17:29
Anyone with any concern for the future of this country who stays home and doesn't vote is an idiot. No politician or anyone else is perfect. If you want a taste of reality, go get elected to your local governing body, and see how difficult it is to get anything done. Everyone who is elected plans to do all sorts of things, but it isn't easy. And blaming the President for not accomplishing things by executive fiat is absurd, if you consider all the issues that have to be done by working with the opposition. PLEASE VOTE this fall, and give the President some hope of continuing his heartfelt agenda.
 
 
-1 # Guest 2010-08-15 13:57
Oh....Michael you're breaking my heart here...If you don't know what Gibbs is talking about....Please.....just stay out of it.
He's talking about the Ariana Huffingtons and others who make a living claiming to be progressives...and NEVER do anything but slam our president. LOOK...it's one thing to not always agree with the man but this lack of respect and distorted messages that they send out there week after week...just to create traffic on their sites....they're click whores.
Please....do some research ....before you go off...please
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-08-15 14:00
Liberal? What kind of dumb...a z s article is this ?
Gibbs speak of liberals ?....he refereed to professional progressives.
HUGE difference.
What have we become? Oh my!!
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-08-15 17:27
Nobody is saying he hasn't accomplished anything. But everything he has accomplished is half-assed. Quantity seems to have surpassed quality in his case. He would have earned more points by doing at least one thing really well without rolling over for the GOP. Take a stand on something man or you will go down as a hard working but mediocre leader.
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-08-17 13:45
Don't decline to vote. Vote Green Party instead.

GO GREEN!!!
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.