Share
Email This Page
add comment

Why the Economy Is So Out of Whack

Print
Monday, 05 April 2010 08:57
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)

Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)


Greenspan, Summers, and Why the Economy Is So Out of Whack

'm in the "green room" at ABC News, waiting to join a roundtable panel discussion on ABC's weekly Sunday news program, This Week.

Alan Greenspan is now being interviewed. He says he bore no responsibility for the housing bubble that catapulted the nation into a financial crisis in 2008 because no one could have known about the bubble when he chaired the Fed in the years before it burst. Larry Summers was interviewed just before Greenspan. He said the economy is expanding, that the Administration is doing everything it can to bring jobs back, and that the regulatory reform bills moving on the Hill will prevent another financial crisis.

What?

If any single person is most responsible for the financial crisis, it's Alan Greenspan. He presided over a Fed that lowered interest rates to zero (adjusted for inflation) but failed to prevent banks from using essentially free money to speculate wildly. You do not have to be a brain surgeon to understand that if money is free, banks will take it and lend it out. And if oversight is inadequate, the banks will lend the money to anyone who can stand up straight and to many who cannot. The result will be a giant subprime lending bubble that will burst.

If any three people are most responsible for the failure of financial regulation, they are Greenspan, Larry Summers, and my former colleague, Bob Rubin. In 1999 they advised Congress to repeal the Glass-Steagall Act, which since 1933 had separated commercial from investment banking. By 1999, Wall Street was salivating over such a repeal because it wanted to create financial supermarkets that could use commercial deposits to place bets in the financial casino. That would yield the Street trillions.

At the same time, Greenspan, Summers, and Rubin also quashed the efforts of the Commodity Futures Trading Corporation to regulate derivatives, when its director began to worry that derivative trading already was getting out of control.

Yet Greenspan continues to take no responsibility for what occurred. In the interview he just completed he avoiding saying anything about the failure of the Fed under his watch to adequately oversee the banks, and the absence of sufficient financial regulation to begin with.

I dislike singling out individuals for blame or praise in a political system as complex as that of the United States but I worry the nation is not on the right economic road, and that these individuals - one of whom advises the President directly and the others who continue to exert substantial influence among policy makers - still don't get it.

The direction financial reform is taking is not encouraging. Both the bill that emerged from the House and the one emerging from the Senate are filled with loopholes that continue to allow reckless trading of derivatives. Neither bill adequately prevents banks from becoming insolvent because of their reckless trades. Neither limits the size of banks or busts up the big ones. Neither resurrects the Glass-Steagall Act. Neither adequately regulates hedge funds.

More fundamentally, neither bill begins to rectify the basic distortion in the national economy whose rewards and incentives are grotesquely tipped toward Wall Street and financial entrepreneurialism, and away from Main Street and real entrepreneurialism. It was just reported, for example, that America's top 25 hedge fund managers last year earned an average of $3 billion each. They continue to pay a federal income tax of 15 percent on most of that, by the way, because their lobbying efforts have been so successful.

Meanwhile, the so-called jobs bills emerging from Congress and the White House are puny relative to the challenge of restoring jobs in America. Last Friday's jobs report, read most positively, showed 112,000 private-sector jobs added to the economy in March. But that's below the number needed simply to keep up with an expanding population. In other words, we're actually worse off now than we were a month ago. At the same time, the median wage of Americans with jobs keep dropping.

The American economy is seriously out of whack. The two people interviewed this morning don't seem to understand how far.


Open Article On Originating Site


Robert Reich is Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written twelve books, including "The Work of Nations," "Locked in the Cabinet," and his most recent book, "Supercapitalism." His "Marketplace" commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.

 

Comments  

 
+8 # Guest 2010-04-05 08:50
Finally, someone has the honesty to name names. The "system" is an abstract term; people did this. Thank you, Bob.
 
 
+7 # Guest 2010-04-05 09:36
The reason for the "out of whack" economy is more profound and structural. The credit bust was simply a manifestation of the underlying structural problem. That problem is the botched transition from a manufacturing to a service economy. The economic wizards who were/are blinded by the "free market will resolve all inefficienties" ideology/theory, failed to build in a indicators and a monitoring system to evaluate if the transition was leading to a more prosperous and stable US economy. The result, since 1970, but really exacerbated in the 1990s has been a massive decline in employment, wages, and the balance of payments has been negative.
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-04-05 09:37
Services other net "export" sectors could not keep up with the massive consumer demand for imported manufactured goods.

Because of the botched transition the economic multipliers have shrunk and the "system" has had massive leakage , i.e., outflow but little inflow. For the last decade the consumer, business, local and national government have been liquidating equity (borrowing) because the structure of the economy has been destroyed.

It reminds me of what I saw in the Ukraine and Tajikistan after the fall of the manufacturing sector in the Soviet Union - they went free market without a plan.

I wish that Robert Reich would examine the input-output tables and the multipliers. Then report back.
 
 
+12 # Guest 2010-04-05 10:40
The housing bubble was created to bail us out of the high-tech bubble and let go too long in order to make G. Bush look better. Now they are trying to resurrect the housing bubble to get the economy pumping again. This is a smoke and mirrors country now. No realism from Washington is starting to show up on the street. One cannot export jobs forever in order to produce goods cheaply to sell to the same country you're taking the jobs from forever without it biting you in a private place. The business of American business IS stealing from the tax payers...that's almost all they do but make war...the other big business!
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-04-05 10:50
Talk about market insanity, at least as I see it. The most recent new Wall Street investment opportunity I saw discussed on CNN was to bet on the gross receipts of newly released movies. Now what the hell do movies and their box office take have to do with investments. It's not an investment in the moves itself, it's just a bet on its popularity. What next?
 
 
+11 # Guest 2010-04-05 10:59
Why doesn't anyone trumpet the vast economic distortion sometimes called "military-industrial complex"? What is the nation's ROI on over 700 foreign military bases? On huge contracts for incredibly expensive weapons systems that we can't afford to use? On military adventures that end in defeat or ongoing quagmire? We starve the teaching profession and we burden future generations with both ignorance and debt. That's our ruinous national investment strategy, and both Democrats and Republicans have followed it for most of my 61 years. And yet economists like Mr. Reich don't even mention it when they talk about how distorted our economy is. The very first step in fixing a problem is to acknowledge its existence. And this is one very BIG problem.
 
 
+13 # Guest 2010-04-05 11:03
...and the beat goes on. Anybody indicted for the crimes committed by the Banking Industry? No? Oh. No changes made to the way they do business? No? Oh. Any of the banks who were saved by the Bail-out, lending money to anybody? No? Oh. Americans, I guess, are just sheep to to be shorn by the powers that be. Hey, Mr. President, THIS is the next big issue you need to address so our economy can get moving again. WHERE is the CHANGE we voted for, Sir?
 
 
+6 # Guest 2010-04-05 13:43
Nice jab, Nancy. I too want my campaign contribution back. He brought in a gang of creeps who had a major role in causing the meltdown; Summers, Geithner et al. expecting 'change'? Wow, did we all get hustled, Chicago-style.
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-04-07 11:28
Hey Nancy.. catch my comment a little bit lower on the thread here. HUD's Andrew Cuomo ordered up and started the major relaxing of requirements - and pushed the banks to play. HUD created the bubble - simple supply and demand economics. And a follow up question for you? Anybody at HUD, Fannie, or Freddie indicted for crimes yet?
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-04-05 11:31
Thanks for reminding me that I have to write my central thesis about why I believe our government is dysfunctional and attach it to my blog space, Dr. Reich.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-04-05 12:40
There is a cancer at the very heart of this country, a Randian perversion of capitalism that Summers and Greenspan are very much responsible for promoting. Till that cancer is removed,nothing will change.

This isn't a matter of economics, but of morality. The "family values" crowd pays lip service to morality -- as does the present administrations , but to date no one has been charged with torturing human beings -- so why does anyone imagine politicians or banksters will be called to task for merely robbing human beings?

Until someone has the guts to connect these dots and start punishing the privileged, nothing will change.
 
 
-5 # Guest 2010-04-05 12:44
Without discrediting Reich's points about Greenspan's role (See Frontline's "The Warning") in creating the environment where the housing bubble went to the moon, but in offering that Greenspan only added more dangerous fuel to the fire (but for a reason) which ultimately allowed the dangerous housing bubble to develop into a mortgage/credit crisis.

First. The housing bubble was born of HUD. In Oct. of 2000, HUD Sec Andrew Cuomo ordered Fannie/Freddie to loosen up rules for lower and moderate income folks (targeting minorities) and to provide $2.4 trillion in mortgages for affordable housing (boy did that turn out to be a laugh) to 28.1 million Americans.

Note: Fannie and Countrywide had entered into a strategic marketing alliance in 1999. By late 2000, CWFinancial was the nation's leading lender to minorities.

Greenspan kept rates low to help get the stuck in slow motion recession Bush inherited back into gear - by the way.
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-04-05 14:04
For Wall Street and there (mostly Republican) political servants Greed is become not just good but it has become God.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-04-05 16:29
....bet Bob won`t touch the real parasites at the central bank....there are no statesmen anymore.....economic problems are all by design and right on time.....
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-04-06 04:07
I agree!!
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-04-06 05:06
More fundamentally, the irrationality that lends itself to fluctuations of this kind, or the less catastrophic in the interim, is inherent in a system that also thrives on non-zero unemployment, namely crapitalism. Something is needed to check these irrationalities , namely socialism. You can't, in all practicality, have one without the other.
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-04-06 05:07
More fundamentally, the irrationality that lends itself to fluctuations of this kind, or the less catastrophic in the interim, is inherent in a system that also thrives on non-zero unemployment, namely crapitalism. Something is needed to check these irrationalities , namely socialism. You can't, in all practicality, have one without the other.
 
 
+6 # Guest 2010-04-06 06:02
It sickens me to hear Greenspan talk about not seeing that bubble coming down the pike.
It didn't take rocket science for my husband and I to see that the price of houses was way beyond what people were making in order to buy and live in those houses.
We still feel that houses are way overpriced relative to wages.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-04-06 11:06
Amen to that, GsMom! I keep feeling I must be in some kind of different universe, where at least some shred of common sense still lives. How can the people who presided over all things financial in the years leading up to this mess not "get it"? Any idiot knows that housing prices could not keep going up forever and ever, or NOBODY would be able to afford to buy them. And any idiot should know that lending too much money to people who obviously did not earn enough to repay would eventually lead to disaster. Don't get it? Then what the h*** are they doing running any part of my government?????
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-04-08 04:29
Reich is one of the few public voices that are willing to challenge the "conventional wisdom" of the Beltway crowd. It is indeed time to name names. Without the official naming of names, the US government will continue to be a government of politicians sans accountability and who, unlike the less privileged citizens of the country, need not operate within the restraints of the civil and criminal codes of the US. Quite simply, US laws no longer apply to elected officials in the United States.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.