Share
Email This Page
add comment

Closing Tax Loopholes for Billionaires

Print
Sunday, 23 May 2010 18:28
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)

Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)

 

 

ho could be opposed to closing a tax loophole that allows hedge-fund and private equity managers to treat their earnings as capital gains - and pay a rate of only 15 percent rather than the 35 percent applied to ordinary income?

Answer: Some of the nation's most prominent and wealthiest private asset managers, such as Paul Allen and Henry Kravis, who, along with hordes of lobbyists, are determined to keep the loophole wide open.

The House has already tried three times to close it only to have the Senate cave in because of campaign donations from these and other financiers who benefit from it.

But the measure will be brought up again in the next few weeks, and this time the result could be different. Few senators want to be overtly seen as favoring Wall Street. And tax revenues are needed to help pay for extensions of popular tax cuts, such as the college tax credit that reduces college costs for tens of thousands of poor and middle class families. Closing this particular loophole would net some $20 billion.

It's not as if these investment fund managers are worth a $20 billion subsidy. Nonetheless they argue that if they have to pay at the normal rate they'll be discouraged from investing in innovative companies and startups. But if such investments are worthwhile they shouldn't need to be subsidized. Besides, in the years leading up to the crash of 2008, hedge-fund and private equity fund managers weren't exactly models of public service. Many speculated in ways that destabilized the whole financial system.

Nor are these fund managers especially deserving, as compared to poor and middle-class families that need a tax break to send their kids to college. Nor are they particularly needy. Last year, the 25 most successful hedge-fund managers earned a billion dollars each. One of them earned 4 billion dollars. (Paul Allen's personal yacht holds two luxury submarines and a helicopter. Henry Kravis is one of the wealthiest people in the world.)

Several of these private investment fund managers, by the way, have taken a lead in the national drive to cut the federal budget deficit. The senior chairman and co-founder of the Blackstone Group, one of the largest private equity funds, is Peter G. Peterson, who never tires of telling the nation it faces economic ruin if deficits aren't brought under control. Curiously, I have not heard Peterson advocate closing this tax loophole as one way to further the cause of fiscal responsibility.

Closing tax loopholes for billionaires may seem like a no-brainer, especially at a time when the nation is cutting back spending on the middle class - slashing budgets that fund child care, public schools, and public universities. Tens of thousands of teachers are getting pink slips.

But you can expect a huge fight.

There is also a moral issue here. Call me old fashioned but I just think it's wrong that a single hedge fund manager earns a billion dollars, when a billion dollars would pay the salaries of about 20,000 teachers.

 

Open Article On Originating Site

Robert Reich is Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written twelve books, including "The Work of Nations," "Locked in the Cabinet," and his most recent book, "Supercapitalism." His "Marketplace" commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.

 

Comments  

 
+16 # Guest 2010-05-23 20:25
The Senate protects the Wealthy and themselves..
The House Protects ALL THAT IS CORPORATE FROM REGULATION...
They BOTH Protect the flow of Corporate Money into OUR Elections...

Just as a bootstrap thought... REGULATIONS are how WE THE PEOPLE protect OURSELVES and decide, among many things, what Corporations can and cannot do within OUR BORDERS...

The whole CONservative relentless drive for ''LESS GOVERNMENT'' through ''LESS REGULATION'' is the biggest HOODWINKING in history and has done nothing for 99% of Americans except DIS-EMPOWER US and EMPOWER CORPORATE DOMINION OVER US..!!!
 
 
-2 # Guest 2010-05-24 08:11
That's fine. But I looked carefully at hundreds of cars in my drive to work this morning and not a single one had a hood that winked at me. I will keep looking.
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-05-24 09:04
Maybe it would be safer for you and other drivers if you keep your eyes on the road... :-D
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-05-24 10:17
I'm Confused. If Corporations are considered individuals before the law in America how is it that they are permitted to murder and dismember and digest each other. If i'm not mistaken, Jeffrey Dahmer was arrested and tried for doing to other "individuals" exactly what we are told by Wall Street to applaud when Blackstone or GE does it to some other corporate "individual"
 
 
+9 # Guest 2010-05-23 21:45
In fighting closure of the tax loophole, conservatives and business interests are just following the golden rule: The one that has the gold makes the rule.
 
 
+8 # Guest 2010-05-23 22:36
Funny -- these bloated plutocrats (in their plush skyboxes) wouldn't demand football games without "zebras" or baseball games without umps, and both sets of officials have big rule books backing them up with "regulations" that are enforced without exemptions. But they demand the "freedom" to run amok (and amuck) with no regulations for their financial games, which aren't subject to any rulebook.. And now the Supreme Court has "ruled" that their corporations have free speech rights with money substituting for actual speech, so they can continue, and even expand, their malpractice of buying elections. Just a few wrinkles in our national fabric that the Founders never foresaw.
 
 
+20 # Guest 2010-05-24 00:48
Question: Just who in the Senate is blocking the closing of these loopholes? Please name names. Voters deserve to know!
 
 
+21 # Guest 2010-05-24 01:00
Names. Names. Names. Voters need to know who in Congress is protecting the tax loopholes for the wealthy. Tell us who the hell they are.
 
 
+13 # Guest 2010-05-24 01:11
There should be limits on income and wealth. Nobody, and I mean nobody, is worth $1 billion a year. Money is power and nobody should be that powerful with no electoral control; especially financial mgrs who create nothing, produce nothing, invent nothing.
What is even more galling is that no Social Security tax is paid after the first $85,000 of income. that tax, as well as income tax, should be progressive to the point that attaining wealth such as Paul Allen's or Bill Gates and all the rest of the multi-billioaires would be impossible.
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-05-24 09:15
Who is more powerful than a multi-Billion Dollar Global Corporate ''Person''...?
Under US Law, a Corporation is a 'Person'...
A Recent Supreme Court Decision now allows for GLOBAL Corporate ''Persons'' to use their vast wealth and power to influence OUR Elections...
I wonder... Does a GLOBAL Corporate ''Person'' think of ITSELF as an American..?
I would also like to ask, with money aside and only with thoughts of ''POWER AND INFLUENCE' in mind..., Is it a healthy thing for Our Democratic Republic to have the current situation continue to exist where almost all Media Enterprises in OUR Country are now owned, operated and easily exploited by just a very few GLOBAL CORPORATE '''PERSONS'''...?
 
 
+13 # Guest 2010-05-24 02:23
Loopholes? There are no loopholes, they were deliberate.
 
 
+12 # Guest 2010-05-24 02:31
Everybody should keep writing your Senators anddemanding a fair shake.
I do it every week...the same with Congress people....

I can't wait until November to speak in the voting booth as well.

We need to protect ourselves...they aint going to do any favors unless....

Phone calls count as a hundred e-mails...so all avenues to keep them on their toes, not ours.

But...you know what?
That's our JOB...we have to do our job better than they do!

Your choice.
 
 
+7 # Guest 2010-05-24 02:46
The insistence for the "need" for de-regulation was one Bush mantra that continues to echo through my head. It was supposed to solve all our problems. Such misguidance was nearly our economic demise.
 
 
+10 # Guest 2010-05-24 06:04
It goes back further than Bush... Its been the Corporate CONservative Republican Mantra ever since Ronald Reagan declared that 'Government Is The Problem'...
Ever since Reagan, NeoCONservative s have been on a relentless drive to completely De-Tax and DeRegulate all Responsibility, Accountability and any possibility of Judicial Sanction away from everything Corporate in America...
Its gotta be the biggest Hoodwinking in history...
 
 
+10 # Guest 2010-05-24 04:47
This hedge fund manager made a billion. Tax should be $350 million. He plays instead $150 million. The manager might have sent $200,000 to the senator. He got a thousandfold return on his investment. THE SENATOR SOLD HIMSELF CHEAP!
 
 
+8 # Guest 2010-05-24 04:56
This fund manager made 1 billion last year. He should have paid a tax of $350 million. Instead he pays $150 million. Suppose the manager sent $200,000 for the Senator's campaign. He saved $200 milllion on his taxes. A THOUSAND FOLD RETURN! THE SENATOR SOLD HIMSELF CHEAP!!!
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-05-24 07:08
BP/Amoco have invested huge funds to recover oil from the hole which is now spilling into the gulf floor, etc. They have no incentive to stop-up this hole, except their public reputation, which has been permanently damaged. Whatever amount of oil they are/may be able to recover now or in the forseeable future from this particular disaster, will just go toward their coffers and be our loss in/on our coastal waters and beaches. Again, greed triumphs mightily, and to hell with the people! Of course the longer this spill continues, the more grief can be heaped on Obama. What a total shame this country has to be jerked around by big business - -to the detrement of the people. Political games per usual. I hope every American is disgusted and will express their displeasure.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-05-24 08:19
BP would be more incentivised if they had to pay royalties on EVERY drop of oil from that well, including the oil lost to the sea. Perhaps their contract actually does require this, which would explain their desire to grossly underestimate the volume gushing forth.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-05-24 07:37
What I do not understand is how people still stop at a BP for gas....there should be a HUGE BOYCOTT against them....TELL YOUR FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS....DO NOT BUY BP GAS...EVER AGAIN.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-05-24 09:17
I have to go along with names, names , names. Give me names.I am neither a Democatic nor a Republican. I am what is called by our boy Rush as a fence sitter, which is exactly where I want to be. Give me names to help me vote for the right person. Us fence sitters have NO real heroes.
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-05-24 11:25
Why now, with two very expensive wars, an economic depression, and a record deficit, would anyone think about ending the estate tax? Do the richest Americans really need yet another break? Our nation is on the precipice of a grave fiscal decline, yet some politicians want to lower an estate tax that only applies to millionaires – less than one percent of all estates. The estate tax raises tens of billions of dollars in revenue every year from those Americans who benefit the most from the prosperity and opportunity this nation represents.

The wealthy provide much for our economy, but lowering or repealing the estate tax in order to shift their fair share of our national burden onto the middle class is entirely irresponsible. Nobody should be loosening their belt when our national debt is in the tens of trillions, particularly not people whose fortunes provide them lifetimes of financial comfort.

Check out United for a Fair Economy at http://www.faireconomy.org/estatetax/
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.