Share
Email This Page
add comment

Who's Killing Financial Reform?

Print
Friday, 05 February 2010 09:09
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)

Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)


Who's Killing Financial Reform?


enator Chris Dodd, the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, scolded Wall Street representatives at a hearing Thursday for sending "an army of lobbyists whose only mission is to kill the common-sense financial reforms" needed by the public. "The fact is," Dodd said, "I am frustrated, and so are the American people." He charged that Wall Street's intransigence was the reason for Congress's failure to pass any bill to regulate the Street. "The refusal of large financial firms to work constructively with Congress on this effort borders on insulting to the American people who have lost so much in this crisis."

In other words, it isn't Congress's fault. It isn't the Senate Banking Committee's fault. It certainly isn't Dodd's fault. The reason more than a year has passed since the biggest bailout in the history of the world and nothing has been done to prevent a repeat performance - even as the biggest banks are doling out more than $30 billion of bonuses, even as Goldman Sachs is awarding its big traders $16 billion in bonuses (more than the $13 billion Goldman collected from taxpayers via the bailout of AIG), even as AIG itself is handing out bonuses - the reason is ... what, exactly, Senator? Because the Street has sent an army of lobbyists to Capitol Hill?

Call me old fashioned, but I thought Congress was in charge of passing legislation, not Wall Street.

Dodd left out the most telling detail, of course. Wall Street is where the campaign money is. Dodd of all people knows that. He's been on the receiving end of lots of it over the years.

Wall Street firms and their executives have been uniquely generous to both political parties, emerging recently as one of the largest benefactors of the Democratic Party. Between November 2008 and November 2009, Wall Street firms and executives handed out $42 million to lawmakers, mostly to members of the House and Senate banking committees and House and Senate leaders. During the 2008 elections, Wall Street showered Democratic candidates with well over $88 million and Republicans with over $67 million, putting the Street right up there with the insurance industry as among the nation's largest equal-opportunity donors.

Some Democrats are quietly grumbling that all the tough talk emanating from the White House in recent weeks - the President calling the Street's denizens "fat cats" and threatening them with limits on their size and the risks they can take, even waiving a watered-down version of Glass-Steagall in their faces - is making it harder to collect money from the Street this mid-term election year. And the Street is quietly threatening that it may well give Republicans more, if the saber-rattling doesn't stop.

Congress isn't doing a thing about Wall Street because it's in the pocket of Wall Street. Dodd's outburst at the Street is like the alcoholic who screams at a bartender "how dare you give me another drink when all I've done is pleaded with you for one!"

Dodd is right about one thing. The American people are frustrated, and the failure of Congress to pass real financial reform is insulting. But in trying to place responsibility for this appalling failure on Wall Street, Dodd insults us even more.


Robert Reich is Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written twelve books, including "The Work of Nations," "Locked in the Cabinet," and his most recent book, "Supercapitalism." His "Marketplace" commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.

 

Comments  

 
+18 # Guest 2010-02-05 10:33
Reich hits the nail on the head. Congress is completely bought and sold by wall street. The public will stupidly respond by voting out the Democrats, and we will have a bunch of Republicans who give even less than a damn.

We are looking at the end, folks.....
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-02-05 14:07
You are so so right! Gratifying to read a comment that's not a nut case.
 
 
+10 # Guest 2010-02-05 10:54
Sadly, the big bonuses on Wall Street serve as a not so subtle reminder to congress and to all of us who is really in charge here.

Now more than ever we need transparency with campaign financing if we are ever going to have a chance at electing leaders who are not beholden to such special well-heeled special interests.
 
 
+8 # Guest 2010-02-05 11:46
Thank you, Robert Reich. Truer words were never spoken.
 
 
+9 # Guest 2010-02-05 12:04
....congress shrugged that responsibility many years ago...now men who serve only themselves control our currency...no allegiance to country....only to wealth and control
 
 
+9 # Guest 2010-02-05 12:38
Dr. Reich: You need to re-print the essay you wrote in 1996 about corporate welfare that got you fired by Bill Clinton. That piece is even more relevant than it was at that time.
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-02-05 12:59
Amazing how these duplicitous SOBs in congress play good cope bad cop all by themselves. Consternation for public consumption, cashing the checks from the black hats to stay in power. The country is a joke. Jefferson said we needed...all institutions needed....little revolutions to keep them on track. This one is a 150 years overdue.
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-02-08 19:10
I hope that everyone reading these analyses, by thoughtful and angry Americans, will send their Congress people angry letters. Time has run out and the situation is desperate! Unemployment is at 17%, that's the truth.
This is a CRISIS!! Write them now!
 
 
+3 # ProfPeteB 2010-02-05 13:15
Rockefeller and his banking interests which own Big Pharma and the new and cowardly president, who displays no effective movement away from the fascist Bush plans. Obama is no FDR, unfortunately. His goals have little to do with improving the lives of American working poor and middle class citizens. Obama has ignored; the doubling of gas prices from $1.44 in December 2008 to over $3.03 three times since, nor has he offered to do as did Jimmy Carter, by framing a Windfall Profits Tax on Big Oil, and a cap on gas/oil prices
He has also left the Patriot Act intact as well as The Military Commission's Act of 2006, which former gutted the Constitution, and the latter destroyed the Bill of Rights.
Nor has he tried to tax corporations which outsource jobs overseas, nor has he attempted to add Federal standards on Housing insulation and grants for Geothermal HVAC and metal roofs/ Solar Shingles.
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-02-06 09:06
You're absolutely right. Just to add to your list a little: American citizens are still being spied upon by AT&T. And he continues the Democratic pattern of selling out traditional Democratic values (as you say here) aka trying to 'out-Republican' the Republicans. He does this by hiring Emmanuel, Giethner & Summers, thereby continuing Clinton's strategy of refusing to regulate business in any way. Paradoxically, he does THAT even while talking about 'the people who have got us here for the last few decades (the Reagan years).
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-02-05 13:44
Enough! If Congress (mostly on the part of the Senate) will not do their jobs, ie. representing the people, then off with their heads. What these jokers have to do is reclaim their balls and take a risk. It doesn't matter whether the corporate masters give more money to the Republicans. Voters intuitively know when their representatives are working for them or not. I say intuitively, because a large percentage of voters are not what you would call 'intelligent' thinkers or have been trained in rationale criticism and they believe everything they hear from the media propaganda that is bought and paid for by the corporations that are controlling us all. Educate the masses on how to think clearly and perhaps America will start living up to the potential she has to be a truly great nation.
 
 
+5 # Guest 2010-02-05 16:07
Robert Reich is right on target. But the biggest blow to the future of our democracy recently is the Supreme Court decision that will now allow corporations to not only broker our elections but to buy them lock, stock, and barrel. That decision fits neatly in hand with these all too familiar failures of our representatives to represent us voters. We are merely pawns that they must suck up to every two to four years for our votes in what has become nothing more than a quaint formality; then they go back to serving their real masters. All very sickening to say the least. Moving to another country is looking more and more attractive by the day.
 
 
+2 # jlohman 2010-02-05 16:13
It's called posturing. Even though Dodd knows he's going to work for Wall Street, he has to make them look like bad guys.

Jack Lohman
http://MoneyedPoliticians.net
 
 
-3 # Guest 2010-02-06 05:56
Let's call it what it is: bribery. Corruption at the highest levels of gov't; pols bought and paid for by Wall Street. For example, Robert Rubin was an Obama fund-raiser. Wall Street generated some 10% to 12% of Obama's campaign funds. In other words, Obama is simply a House Niggah for vested interests. And the idiotic Democrats are equally to blame, though the do-nothing, treasonous Republicans have taken sabotage to a new level.
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-02-06 10:23
Lets not sink into name-calling, shall we? It's so...tea-partyish. The fact is, we as an electorate need to send a clear signal that we want campaign finance form. Otherwise, any politician, no matter how well-intentioned, needs to play the old games in order to win. I put Obama in this category. And I generally believe he's trying to change things for the better in this and many other regards, despite opposition from both sides of the aisle in Congress.
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-02-07 18:58
Please note that Obama is half white. It would be good to avoid racial slurs, if you would have your remarks received seriously.
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-02-06 07:17
So long as it remains legal to bribe legislators this nation will continue its headlong slide into becoming a 3rd world nation. Congress will be paid to assure the rich and powerful an unfair advantage in all matters so that democracy will become a euphemism for indentured servitude.
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-02-06 08:53
But Professor Reich, what is the solution to the problem you state?

My solution is federal financing of federal elections. Nothing original with me, but also a seemingly hopeless goal, since congress must vote on it.

Is it hopeless?
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-02-06 10:19
Congress will not pass real financial reform until the issue of campaign finance reform is resolved. Campaign finance reform is the key - and if any set of politicians ever gets the kahunas to make it happen, it will be the single most effective move to return the power to the people in recent history. His/her face should be carved on Mt. Rushmore, because it will be a truly heroic accomplishment. Either through public funding or equalized spending limits or some other method, until the people know that their politicians are not being bought, we will not see meaningful change in this country. Of course, a change like this would also mean that the electorate would have to become informed. So we've got a lot of work to do in both camps.
 
 
-1 # Guest 2010-02-06 11:20
Tony Gronner: I think it is hopeless. The people in the position to change anything depend on the largess of corporate America.
Joe Six-pack and Patsy Public refuse to accept, deep down, that the American political system is totally corrupt and that there is little or no hope that that will change.
 
 
+1 # tom2000 2010-02-06 12:13
Godspeed to you Dr. Reich,

Thank you for remaining a principed economist when so many in your profession have "sold-out to America inc.
 
 
-1 # Guest 2010-02-06 14:42
My it seems to me that many people now know the extent of the corruption in Washington, however , when those charged with making and enforcing the laws are the largest violaters of the system, what can you do? Rant on theser blogs thats what. The best thing you can say about Obama is that he's like Woodrow Wilson at Versailles he "that he brought a bible to a poker game." And I think that being kind.
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-02-07 14:01
The fact is an understanding of the hallmarks of addiction is a better start to understanding Wall Street than is all the econo-babble that we hear from expert commentators on these so-called expert capitalists. (You are an exception Dr. Reich.)
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.