Share
Email This Page
add comment

Wall Street's Not So Free Market

Print
Saturday, 13 February 2010 08:53
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)

Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)


Open Article On Originating Site

One Free Market System for Wall Street, Another Free Market System for Main Street

ashington is paralyzed by snow and partisanship. Nothing is getting done - even as the Great Recession pulls more Americans into its maw.

In the midst of this paralysis, the President was asked about the giant pay packages of Jamie Dimon, CEO of JP Morgan Chase & Co. ($17 mullion for 2009) and Lloyd Blankfein, CEO of Goldman Sachs ($9 million). "First of all, I know both those guys," Obama said. "They're very savvy businessmen. And I, like most of the American people, don't begrudge people success or wealth. That's part of the free market system."

Free market system? As I remember it, American taxpayers forked out hundreds of billions to keep JPMorgan, Goldman, and other big Wall Street banks afloat through most of 2009. Had we not done so, Dimon, Blankfein, and most other top executives on Wall Street would not have earned a dime last year. In fact, some would be out on the street, reather than sitting pretty on the Street.

The free market system has been unleashed instead on average Americans. According to real-estate data firm First American CoreLogic, about one-fourth of American households with a mortgage are under water - owing more on their homes than their homes are worth. Mortgage-bond trader Amherst Securities estimates that 7.1 million of the 7.9 households now behind on their mortgage payments will lose their homes to foreclosure if nothing is done to modify their loans. Already cities and towns are littered with foreclosure sales, pulling down the values of all homes in the area.

Jamie Dimon, Lloyd Blankfein, and most of the rest of Wall Street don't worry about what's happening to homes on Main Street because their savings are invested in stocks and bonds. But most middle-class Americans do worry because most (if not all) of their savings are in their homes. As home values continue to slip, average Americans' one big asset is shrinking.

The best way to help reverse this downward slide would be to let bankruptcy judges restructure shaky home mortgages, reducing what borrowers owe. The problem is, the big banks hate this. If mortgages could be restructured this way, the banks would take big hits. They'd be forced to cut the amounts owed by borrowers. They figure they do better by squeezing as much as they can out of distressed homeowners, then collecting as much as they can on foreclosed properties.

So, not surprisingly, the big banks have been mounting a major lobbying campaign to block legislation that would allow homeowners to use bankruptcy.

Bankruptcy has been part of the "free market system" for hundreds of years, but its details are determined through politics - the same politics that arranged the $700 billion bailout of Wall Street. In fact, you might say that during 2009, Wall Street went through its own kind of bankruptcy restructuring, with the generous aid of American taxpayers. JP Morgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Citigroup and Wells Fargo, along with their top executives, traders, and major investors, have benefited handsomely.

Now, a quarter of American homeowners need help restructuring their loans, but Wall Street is blocking the way.

Rather than defending the outsized paychecks of Dimon, Blankfein, and the rest of Wall Street as part of the free market system, the President needs to demand that Wall Street help homeowners on Main Street. The Obama White House should have made this a condition of getting the giant bailouts in the first place. The least it can do now is to is to make the free market system work for everyone.


Robert Reich is Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written twelve books, including "The Work of Nations," "Locked in the Cabinet," and his most recent book, "Supercapitalism." His "Marketplace" commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.

 

Comments  

 
0 # Infokronea 2010-02-13 11:37
I think your right, but I think we can no longer trust the banks, but must dial direct. I run a non-profit and my home is my biz location. The bank (BoA) has stopped me at every turn from saving my home. The behavior is irrational. Since my field is the study of extremism, I can't help but observe that my exchanges with BoA have more in common with a hostage negotiation than dealing with a legitimate biz. It's as if BoA is bankrupt and the rats are stripping the ship of everything...tax-payer money, insurance money to repair homes (my case involves an element of that - I did the repairs, passed inspection, and now they won't apply the funds to my mortgage, thus saving my home), etc. In other words, they don't care what happens to BoA, its customers, clients, or stockholders. It's every man at BoA for himself. I vote that we deny them all any more tax-payer cheese and let the chips fall where they may. If I must lose my home, why should I, a tax-payer, pay to keep theirs?
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-02-13 12:57
First I heard the speech referred to in this article and the statement used was taken totally out of context. There was a But at the end of the statement about knowing them saying they were going to have to suffer along with the rest of America. Bankruptcy is not a solution because
the Republicans under Bush changed the law while in power so that some debts do not fall under the law. The other problem with that is the terrible credit that stays on your Credit report 10 years rather than 7. If you are wanting to let free market system work it out you have to go somewhere that has free market system which we have not had for 50 years.
The continous lobby and purchace of politicians got us where we are now. Letting anyone in the top tier of management stay one the job after the bailout is a crime in itself. Yes there are many off Wallstreet that could run those companies.
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-02-14 14:51
thanks JD.
"bankruptcy is not a solution because they changed it"
well, change it again!
not a solution. huh. what's not a solution is teh Sherman Anti-trust act. that one is wasted paper for even being on the books. some laws are enforced, others aren't.
remember, in this world, the Prez can declare martial law and/or kill anyone he likes. our genius congress again. Directives 50, 51 and the Patriot Act.
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-02-13 14:46
Since the Obama administration and Congress (meaning most of BOTH parties) have been continuing 85% + of what was going on under the George W. Bush administration at home and abroad (it's far more than the economy, bad as the real "Main Street" economy is), no one should be surprised at any of what results at home or abroad.
 
 
+2 # Guest 2010-02-13 15:14
I live on Main Street but I am not about to lose my house. However, it has lost $100,000 at least in value. I want to sell it to move nearer to my children. That isn't going to happen in this nightmare. I am wondering what would happen to JPMorgan Chase (who holds my mortgage) and to BofA if we all just pulled our retirement money out of the stock market and paid off our houses. I would save $80,000 if I did that. Only I would pay about $30,000 in taxes. It would be nice if Congress would encourage a lot of us to reduce our debt by not taxing us on the dollars we use to reduce the debt. Still, I would save $50,000 paying off my house.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-02-13 15:29
Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch and others
engaged in accounting fraud and were never prosecuted. Neither were the rating agencies that rated shaky mortgage
securities AAA.
It's called the free market because they are above the law?
 
 
+1 # Guest 2010-02-13 16:42
Never, ever, under any circumstances, ever trust any Congressperson, any president, any lawyer, any corporate executive or any corporate executive wannabee (such as tea-baggers) for anything. Never buy anything you can't afford to pay cash for. Pay off all your debts as soon as you can, then burn your credit cards. Banks have outlived their usefulness. There's plenty of cheap land in Africa and Asia... and lots of business opportunities for people too decent to become whining lying little back-stabbing spineless corporate filth.
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-02-13 18:12
Where's Homeless Street? Isn't Homeless Street downtown Main Street? Know some realtors and businesses on Main Street, but don't know any home owners on Main Street. We need help for Family Street, Home Street and Back Street, along with Main Street, because usually Main Street is short and only includes businesses, NOT homes for families.
 
 
-2 # Guest 2010-02-14 10:59
Most of these posts are crud. Anyone with a lick of sense knew the market was headed south when the TV was blaring ads for interest only loans..... and the nice guy you met at a dinner party with a factory job was talking about his spec house. Real estate is ALWAYS cyclical. It seems we just can't get our heads aroound that. But there are signs, for those who care to observe them.
 
 
-2 # Guest 2010-02-15 07:01
Reich, the author of this article is the same guy I heard and watched telling his students at Berkley that it was time for grandpa and grandma to get out of the way for all the young and his audience was yelling and applauding and this same man was testifying to Charlie Rangel on C-Span about the stimilus that no funds go to whites and no experienced carpenters would be used on infrastructure but they'd have to figure out a way to go over the states' heads. We simply can't afford to pay down peoples' mortgages-my mother in law lost over a $100,000 in Texas during the last house meltdown-no one bailed her out..We should have stopped Clinton, Franks and others when they took the regulations and allowed people who couldn't afford houses buy them-accorn and Obama sued Citigroup and forced them to do this so who's fault is this mess anyway????
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-02-15 10:02
We should have stopped Clinton, Franks and others when they took the regulations and allowed people who couldn't afford houses buy them-accorn and Obama sued Citigroup and forced them to do this so who's fault is this mess anyway????

This is blowback!
 
 
0 # Bob 2010-02-19 14:01
It wasn't Clinton and Franks, it was Gramm-Leach-Bliley, Republican deregulation and their refusal to prosecute under the Sherman anti-trust act since Reagan that caused it. The Acorn measure you referred to didn't force them to make bad loans, ir made them quit redlining and those mortgages have the lowest default rate in the country.

The problem with folks like you is that you take to heart the right wing talking points which never have any relationship with the truth.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.