Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Tim Dickinson begins: "Invoking the sunny idealism of a slain nine-year-old girl and the unlikely image of rain puddles in heaven? It wasn't textbook political rhetoric, but President Obama's memorial address for the victims of gunman Jared Lee Loughner was the most powerful speech of his presidency."

President Barack Obama attends the memorial service in Tucson, Arizona, for victims of the shooting there, 01/12/11. (photo: Getty Images)
President Barack Obama attends the memorial service in Tucson, Arizona, for victims of the shooting there, 01/12/11. (photo: Getty Images)



The Most Powerful Speech of Obama's Presidency

By Tim Dickinson, Rolling Stone

16 January 11



Petition: Congressional Action on Political Violence Advocacy



nvoking the sunny idealism of a slain nine-year-old girl and the unlikely image of rain puddles in heaven?

It wasn't textbook political rhetoric, but President Obama's memorial address for the victims of gunman Jared Lee Loughner was the most powerful speech of his presidency.

My own political instinct in anticipation of Obama's address was to write about how the 2012 campaign was beginning in earnest: To contrast Sarah Palin's flag-draped, hearth-side chat (and accusations of "blood libel") with the Democratic president's man-in-the arena eulogy. And by the time the history of the next presidential campaign is written, we may very well recast these dueling speeches in that political frame. But as I sit here Wednesday night, I'm led in a different, less partisan, direction - by a president whose moral suasion I'd come to doubt. (After all, the last time Obama addressed the nation in a crisis, during the darkest moments of the BP oil spill last summer, he'd seemed cold, timid, out of his depth - a far cry from the electrifying politician of the 2008 campaign.)

Obama wasn't in campaign mode in Arizona. He was better than that. The man criticized for his Vulcan detachment in governance suddenly found a deeper groove; with higher fidelity; and affecting compassion. It was as though Obama had finally found his voice - not as a politician but as president.

In confronting the evil of Loughner's actions, the president asked us to aspire to the goodness of those senselessly gunned down in a Safeway parking lot. "If this tragedy prompts reflection and debate - as it should," Obama said, "let's make sure it's worthy of those we have lost." Then, in a rhetorically risky move, he invoked the most innocent of the victims, nine year old Christina Taylor Green, to summon America's better angels: "I want to live up to her expectations. I want our democracy to be as good as Christina imagined it," Obama said. "All of us – we should do everything we can to make sure this country lives up to our children's expectations."

Obama succeeded last night by using his pulpit not to bully, but to lead a polarized nation past finger pointing and toward a higher purpose.

Sure: It was good night for Obama, politically. But it was a better night, by far, for America.


To watch President Obama's speech or read the transcript click here.

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+36 # soularddave 2011-01-16 21:54
I found a television and watched the speech. It restored something in me and made me proud of our President. I learned some salient facts about each of the victims, and was proud of each one of them.

Hopefully this whole sordid incident can be where we rise as a nation and resolve to be less foolish in how we approach our lives and conduct our politics.
 
 
-22 # rf 2011-01-17 04:48
He was talking the talk as he simultaneously reditioned for torture several in Afganistan!
 
 
-33 # Rick Levy 2011-01-16 23:11
"rain puddles in heaven". How mawkish. Too bad that Obama has to pander to Americans' belief in the myth of an afterlife. Surely he's too intelligent to believe that rubbish himself (isn't he?)
 
 
-20 # doctoretty 2011-01-17 06:37
the fact that two members of his cabinet chose to read directly from scripture in a public arena as if they were preachers, not government offcials, shows that this administration knows as little about the separation of church and state as the last one did.
 
 
-39 # Paul Brown 2011-01-16 23:22
When will we learn that talk is cheap, in this post-Orwellian world? Emperor Obama has no clothes.
 
 
+22 # Dick C. 2011-01-16 23:47
The president is a great orator but not much will change. This was a safe easy speech to make, no opposition to Wall Street banksters, the MIC, Big Oil, Big Pharma/Insurance. His actions are more important.....continuing winless wars, allowing torture/Gitmo, giving those tax cuts to the powerful oligarchs, letting lobbyists write the laws, etc. How about ending these wars, invest in American jobs/infrastructure/education, restore the Fairness Doctrine, provide universal Single-Payer Health Care, stop the foreclosures, protect our safety nets (Medicare, Social Security, unemployment insurance, etc.)? Will Obama push for a ban on assault weapons, set up facilities to help the mentally ill? No, not likely, we need those funds for more wars. Peace.
 
 
-28 # End Endless Wars 2011-01-17 02:32
Nonesense... Obama accomplished nothing except helping to keep the average American asleep while the house is on fire.
See: http://readersupportednews.org/pm-section/25-25/4586-obama-is-palin-without-the-lipstick
 
 
-18 # mediasavy 2011-01-17 04:58
Actually, he's worse than that. He's destroying the working middle class. A fine followup to Clinton's assault on the poor. But what can you expect from a 'Third Way' politician?

The man is a moderate Republican and the banking industry's best friend.
 
 
+26 # cappy 2011-01-17 05:21
Our president gave us back our humanity with his speech. He used the right words, as kind people do when consoling those who have lost a loved one. What's wrong with that? He did away with harsh rhetoric at a time when all of us needed to hear words of comfort and healing. He asked us ALL, Paul Brown, to stop the negative and hurtful name calling, so stop. Just stop.
 
 
+36 # Kate Kahn 2011-01-17 06:44
These previous posters are incredibly cynical. Dick C. is right in all that he said has to be done. But what does that have to do with this incredible speech? It was moving, it was elegant and it was American. It was even more, it was human. If we on the left want the right to be civil, we have to show the way. They don't know how. President Obama is a grown up, and after W. aren't we grateful for that?
 
 
+17 # historywriter 2011-01-17 08:41
Cappy and Kate: You are both absolutely right. Let's just accept--and praise--this speech for what it is and quit trying to set it against Obama's failures.
Let's try for a while to quit being cynical. Let's try to quit personalizing our comments.
 
 
+9 # DaveW. 2011-01-17 09:37
To historywriter,C appy and Kate, Yes, it was a moving speech. Yes,I'm grateful W. is gone and Obama is a grown up. We do need to be less cynical. But cynicism doesn't manifest itself without cause. Many of us have been "cynical" because we basically have gotten "lofty speeches" accompanied by "empty promises." Kate says "Dick C. is right in all that he said has to be done, but what does that have to do with this incredible speech?" Pardon a slight foray into cynicism but it has "everything" to do with it. Why? Because basically that's all lower and middle America has gotten from this President and Democrats who convinced us (with lofty speeches) of all the things they were going to do for us. Though obviously cliched,"actions DO speak louder than words." The speech was great because this is what this man absolutely excels in. There's an "American" young man sitting in the "torture" of solitary confinement for making a "speech" of sorts. His crime is that he "spoke truth to power." Do grandiose speeches and tear inducing oratory excuse inexcusable actions? Perhaps we can ask Bradley Manning that question if he EVER sees the light of day again. Millions are worn out with politicians kissing babies,shaking hands,making speeches and then returning to "business as usual." Cynicism "dries up" when the sun comes out. We've been living under a dark cloud for a long time now.
 
 
+2 # Jorge 2011-01-17 11:21
Yes, Dave W., we have had enough of Obama's empty rhetoric. Talk is cheap. If MLK were alive today he would be protesting Obama's wars and the disconnects from his campaign promises to the realty (helping Wall Street at the expense of Main Street, inadequate health care, huge unemployment numbers, underfunded schools at the expense of the military budget, etc., etc.).
 
 
+4 # DaveW. 2011-01-17 17:06
Jorge, You and I and many others understand the nature of Obama "using" this horrific event to "appear" to be a consolidating leader. The reality is in the policies he's pursued. All the things you mentioned and more. Do any progressive/liberals honestly believe the Boehner/McConnell/Palin acolytes will behave any differently because of that speech? Faux News is "spinning" so fast they're about to come off their "axis of evil." More importantly, will OBAMA take them all on. A lot of us are still waiting. No disrespect to those weary of the endless and acrimonious cynicism. Unfortunately, in this world, "results" are eventually forged in blood, sinew and bone. I'm as Pacifist as any. But we're at war with an ideology that will stop at nothing to destroy what's left of the egalitarian legacy left us by FDR, LBJ,and MLK. Somehow, we have to fight back and Obama is "our" leader. So I say to him: What now?
 
 
+1 # Jorge 2011-01-17 19:16
Granted, it was a good speech, sounded heart-felt. Maybe it comforted his indomitable believers. But we can expect little based on his track record (hey, we are half-way through his term and have seen many disappointments with Obama). In California, Arnold has just left after some huge campaign promises but it was business (corrupt) as usual as soon as he got in. Arnold loved the PR photo-op, would show up at any fire in the state for a photo-op (near the end of his term he would even show up if you have a fire in your fireplace). Another all talk, no-action politician (no good actions, anyway). Let's look forward in 2011 to Progressive activities to change our government and help the lower 98%.
 
 
-7 # mediasavy 2011-01-17 07:00
Nobody care about Obama's 'eloquence', when his words stand in sharp contrast to his banker-friendly economic policies, in the middle of a bloody depression.

I, too, have a gift for words. But my words would mean nothing, if my deeds did not match them. Obama sold us out to his buddies on Wall Street.

This is not the change I voted for. It is, in fact, the policies I thought I was voting against in 2008.

I won't be fooled again.
 
 
+21 # Procyon_Lotor 2011-01-17 07:16
"I won't be fooled again"? Does that mean, if you had it to do over again, you'd vote for McCain/Palin? Because that was the only other choice available in the last election.m & it may be far worse than that in the next.
 
 
0 # Mike K 2011-01-17 15:29
So you think Obama is to big to fail?
I'd consider voteing R since it might have meant near open political warfair on the part of Democrats agaist the radical right and them forceing McCain to do what is right. Also there is always voteing for a third party like the Green party, the more the two main parties disapoint voters the more third parties become a viable option.
 
 
+4 # DaveW. 2011-01-17 17:18
Procyon_Lotor, I,for one, would NOT have voted for McCain/Palin. Of course, at the time, I THOUGHT my vote was helping to elect an honest-to-goodness progressive/liberal who would do the things he stated in his campaign speeches. He has decidedly not lived up to the hype. Given the choice between Obama and whatever pseudo/Fascist runs against him in 2012 I'll no doubt vote for him again. And exactly where does that leave us. It leaves us the choice of basically voting for what would be considered a liberal/moderate REPUBLICAN as late as the 1970's and a further descent into madness. I'm too thrilled for words!
 
 
+21 # DougS 2011-01-17 07:43
I am deeply saddened by the cynicism this thread has taken. Our President has shown that he can be PRESEDENTIAL, not just political. I kind of like the presidential Obama. He needs to continue leading from the heart and head. The key word - LEAD - not political expediency.
 
 
+23 # KarenE 2011-01-17 08:17
What interests me is the general attitude that seems to go hand in hand with the cynicism: e.g., "why isn't (fill in the blank) doing something about this?" As if we were all spectators in some kind of national ball game, angry at the guys on the field for failing to make the play. However, we are all on the field.

I encourage all of us in this discussion to put this kind of intensity into actual service. Anger is healthy if it is motivation to positive action. We are adults, not children waiting to be led. If you see a mess, roll up your sleeves and get to work. "It is better to light a candle than to curse the darkness."
 
 
+13 # historywriter 2011-01-17 08:45
Karen
All of you are in this whether you know it or not.
Go out and do something. Go help someone. Contribute or work in a food bank. Or in a shelter. Or run for office. If you're not doing anything, quit bitching. If you're not doing anything, find something else to complain about. Like snow plowing or something. Quit messing up the world with all your negativity and blaming everyone else.
Yes, light a candle. If you do, and I do and everyone else does, think of the light we can shed to see our way clearly to what needs to be done.
 
 
+5 # wfalco 2011-01-17 08:34
Quoting
I am deeply saddened by the cynicism this thread has taken. Our President has shown that he can be PRESEDENTIAL, not just political. I kind of like the presidential Obama. He needs to continue leading from the heart and head. The key word - LEAD - not political expediency.

I agree with you DougS. It's why I go my own way politically, although I am pragmatically radical philospohically and am in general agreement with most of the writers here. The "pure radicals" who write on these threads will never give the President credit. He may be as pragmatically radical in his heart as any of us but he is profoundly aware he has to deal with a srong streak of moderate conservatism in the majority of citizens. Also it seems apparent these "pure" radicals don't know any African Americans. I am good friends with several and I can assure you President Obama is their hero and they will vote for him en masse in 2012. What other democrat will have that "base" in his pocket?
 
 
+6 # Mike K 2011-01-17 15:36
He preemtively surrendered on the public options and the Tax cuts for villionairs. Also he settled for a Stimules package that was far to small and larded with Tax cuts.
That's not pragmatism, it's weakness and timidity.
 
 
+5 # Mike K 2011-01-17 15:37
He has not only refused to hold the Bush administration acountable for there crimes, his administration has worked to keep them from being going to court. They have also continued many of there illegal policies.
That's not pragmatism.
 
 
+6 # Mike K 2011-01-17 15:41
Almost all his economic advisers have been from wallstreet. His new chief of staff worked for JP Morgan and has been openly against "Obamacare" (saying the basicly center right bill was to far left) and the new consumer protection agency.
 
 
+12 # dejaiz 2011-01-17 08:57
It was a eulogy, a speech that praises, a tribute to the slain and survivors of the attack. This was not something to be rated or to further an agenda. It was a way of recognizing the people who were senselessly attacked while exercising their rights to meet and communicate with their representative. The President delivering the eulogy adds to the tribute.
 
 
+12 # vdelgoriosr 2011-01-17 09:09
After reading all of these comments I can only come to one conclusion. Those of you who found fault with the Presidents sincere reflection on the events in Tucson must reexamine your own sensitivity to human suffering. Obama was genuine in his eulogy honoring the fallen and deceased. There were no motivations on his part and if there was one it was to bring back civility to the national discourse.
 
 
+11 # propsguy 2011-01-17 09:19
actually, speech or no speech, until we have a progressive income tax with the wealthiest paying their share, universal health care so that no one goes bankrupt because of their medical expenses, until the government stops using our tax dollars to bail out banks and fight wars of energy aggression, until we stop polluting the planet as part of our energy policy, this will not be a country in which that little girl, or any of us for that matter, can afford to live
 
 
+8 # Procyon_Lotor 2011-01-17 10:03
You are exactly right. When will Americans stop regarding their political parties in the same way they regard their favorite sports team? "My team MUST win, and damn the consequences!" That dynamic does not fit the circumstances.
 
 
+5 # Harold R. Mencher 2011-01-17 10:21
I've noticed that those people who speak the truth about Obama in this thread have gotten beaten down, and it's okay for those people to remain naive and want to continue to believe in Obama's words but not his deeds, and maintain their heads buried in the sand like Ostriches. I voted for the man, but he let me down and he let his voting base down, and that's the truth.

Barack Obama is a great orator. I will give him that much. He makes great and wonderful speeches that help to inspire people, but words don't change reality. It's one's actions and deeds that change reality. There were many people in history who were great orators, but whose actions, or lack thereof, led to great tragedies.

For all intents and purposes, we are still living to a very large degree in an atmosphere that is more like the Bush administration than what Obama had promised us. The illegal wars of aggression not only continue, but are being expanded with more innocent indigenous people being murdered today than ever. Torture, extrajudicial killings, extraordinary rendition, indefinite detention of mostly innocent victims, illegal spying on U.S. citizens, and so many other Bush era practices continue today under Barack Obama.

So, if you want to hit me with your negative points, go right ahead. It will not change the truth about who Obama really is.
 
 
+10 # Bill Simpich 2011-01-17 12:07
Both sides have a lot of it right in this discussion.

While war rages in Afghanistan, rendition continues, Bradley Manning sits in jail for telling the truth, and the President doesn't stand with the economically oppressed, he deserves every bit of criticism voiced on this page.

At the same time, Obama is a man on the left hand side of the spectrum who actually got elected President of the United States while the American empire is in full regressive mode. He has done some good things and will do some more. He is constrained by political realities and the need to get re-elected by a right-of-center electorate.

Those of us on the left should pay attention to the reaction to Oswald and his most recent speech. Vision inspires people to move beyond their comfort zone. Reaching out to people who see the world differently is a good thing. Criticism without vision doesn't move the discussion forward.
 
 
+6 # Harold R. Mencher 2011-01-17 13:22
Bill, I wasn't the one who selected the hands-down symbol. I don't know who it was, but, to be perfectly honest, I have a difficult time in deciding which one to select because, as you stated early-on in your posting, you seem to cover both sides of the spectrum.

You state that "Obama is a man on the left hand side of the spectrum." I have no idea what you mean by that. From Obama's actions & deeds, & not from his great oratory, which would make you think that he's on the left, he appears to be much more to the right, & not even close to the center.

He continues to try to fool & deceive his voting base with his great words, that he's a man of honor & integrity speaking from the left, but, unfortunately, we are experiencing a president whose actual actions have substantially improved the lot on the right, starting with the banksters & his strong support of the TARP bailout Bill as written by Hank Paulson, as well as energy companies & weapon manufacturers.

You also state that the U.S. empire is in full regressive mode. It seems to me that our U.S. empire is succeeding beyond its widest dream in expanding its horizons by continuing to take control over more & more countries each year, and, yes, at a great cost to the American people.

I know how to fix the problems here in the United States, but I don't have the power to do so.
 
 
+4 # Harold R. Mencher 2011-01-17 15:31
Quoting
He has done some good things and will do some more. He is constrained by political realities and the need to get re-elected by a right-of-center electorate.


You made the above statements. I would 1st like to point out to you that GW also had political realities, & yet that didn't stop him from steamrolling over the Dems when they got in his way or using fear tactics against the Dems in order to accomplish virtually everything that he set out to accomplish, most of which seriously hurt the average American. Bush threatened the Senate Dems with the nuclear option that would've completely nullified the filibuster requiring only a simple majority vote in the Senate in order to pass any Bill that Bush wanted to pass, or to select any candidate for any position.

The one big thing that Bush failed to do was destroy the entitlements, most especially Social Security (SS) by privatizing it. But, Obama, allegedly a Dem pres, along with the Repubs, appear well on their way in destroying SS & Medicare & Medicaid. The payroll tax cut that Obama passed in Dec was just the beginning in the overall effort to destroy SS.

You said that Obama has done some good things, but, in doing so, has appeared to give much more to the right wing extremists than he has accomplished for the average U.S. citizen.
 
 
+3 # DaveW. 2011-01-17 17:41
Bill Simpich, "He is constrained by political realities and the need to get re-elected by a right-of-center electorate." Why Bill, do you think we have a "right-of-center" electorate. I'll tell you, in my opinion, of course. The Democratic party, once the champion of LEFT-OF-CENTER policies that made the country the envy of the world began to be corrupted by the same forces that had debauched their opponents. Tax breaks for the wealthy. De-regulation of the financial industry. Free trade and NAFTA that decimated jobs in America. The perpetuation of the Military Industrial Complex. Obama being re-elected by a right-of-center electorate leaves my "vision" telling me "our comfort zone" will be mighty small. Still, you sound like someone who is trying to take in the whole picture and that is always a good thing.
 
 
+1 # genierae 2011-01-18 05:37
We will not survive as a nation, nor as a species, if we don't stop attacking each other. Its just that simple. We live in dangerous times. This world has much larger problems than you think, and being negative only makes it worse. Some on the left are allowing themselves to be brought down to the level of the far right, and they need to examine their words and actions. It is a legitimate thing to criticize the president, or any other office-holder, but we need to do it with respect, not contempt. We need to focus on the whole picture, not just on our own agenda, and tell the complete truth about Obama. I have always considered the left to be the ones who take the high road, but recently many progressives have fallen into the same bad habits exhibited by those on the right. Its time to step back and reflect on how we can turn back to the high road again. Republicans are immune to reason, we must accept that. We are wasting precious time in useless battles, its time to use our intelligence and compassion to solve problems, not create more. Its later than you think.
 
 
+1 # Gary Ray Pierson 2011-01-18 06:22
A lot of people with negative responses just don't get it or are a part of it and it's not good.... Too bad mental help isn't available for them and all.. Some fat Russian said he will bury us.. I think we buried ourselves... With the help of the Right.. Hate names.. The Right is Wrong and they know it.. But, mental health is hard to get these days,or any health that doesn't bankrupt you for the sake of a war machine outta control.. Thanks to Congress and the GOP...garyray
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.