Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

JP Sottile begins: "Let the Birthers be silenced, let those who question the veracity of Obama's patriotism be damned. And put to rest any doubt about his commitment to the nation's ideals."

President Barack Obama, photographed during a Rolling Stone inteview, 09/28/10. (photo: Reuters)
President Barack Obama, photographed during a Rolling Stone inteview, 09/28/10. (photo: Reuters)



When Presidents Attack!

By JP Sottile, Reader Supported News

21 March 11


RSN Special Coverage: Egypt's Struggle for Democracy

 

et the Birthers be silenced, let those who question the veracity of Obama's patriotism be damned. And put to rest any doubt about his commitment to the nation's ideals.

By dropping bombs on an oil-producing country, he's kept alive a rich White House tradition of using military force to assist oil companies, to enrich the military-industrial complex and to buoy the chief executive's image as a forceful decision-maker.

Obama is now officially an American President.

Of course, he's ducking behind the cover of an international coalition. Like all coalitions, be they of "the willing" or merely the able, they diffuse possible guilt by expanding the association. And wasn't it amazing to see just how quickly after the UN vote those Tomahawks flew and those bombs fell? Only a cynic would consider the vote a fait accompli. Right?

To be fair, Obama and Co. had no choice. Libya's kooky dictator, the Qaddafi Duck of oil regimes, crossed an all-important line in the sand. The chaos caused by his loosening grip "disrupted" Halliburton's operations and "forced" them to evacuate personnel.

Now, that's some aggression we cannot stand.

It's not that oil companies dislike uncertainty. Quite to the contrary, "uncertainty" in the market is a boon to short term profits. How many times have you heard that the price of oil is spiking on "fears" of political turmoil or possible disruptions in the supply chain? Even if the supply never falters, these emotional reactions translate into windfalls for Saudi princes and well-heeled American investors. Fear is the mother's milk of short selling.

For Halliburton, though, this is an iffy battle between their long-time partner and people who've probably not gotten rich off of their homeland's oil. This creates the one type of uncertainty all oil companies work to avoid - the vacuum caused by the loss of a dictator.

Dictators are easy to deal with and predictable. One-stop shopping. You know exactly who to pay and what to pay them. A democracy or, god-forbid, a post-revolutionary morass, presents unique challenges to those accustomed to grasping a reliable set of greasy palms. New leadership may be harder to pay off and oil spigots harder to keep on, particularly if rebels hold true to some amorphous, market-shifting ideals about "the people" benefitting from the fruit of their own land.

Perhaps that is why Halliburton, for the better part of two decades, sold its extraction equipment and banquet of oil-related services to the reliable Colonel. Even after the Berlin Disco and Lockerbie bombings, his productive oil fields and dictatorial grip gleamed like a coveted prize throughout the executive offices of the ubiquitous, shadowy and strategically-diversified oil giant. In fact, they ignored laws against trading with and selling to Libya. They were even found guilty of illegally dealing with Qaddafi in 1995.

Despite the rebuke, they fought hard throughout the Cheney Years to change those restrictions. Just as they had with Iran and Iraq, Halliburton worked tirelessly to evade and remove legal obstacles. Squishy concepts of immorality or illegality do not apply to the world of petrodollars. Ultimately, who are they to determine the moral or ethical legitimacy of those regimes? As far as the oil industry is concerned, there is no judgment in money. They love it unconditionally.

And presidents must learn quickly to toe the bottom lines drawn in Middle Eastern sand.

This might explain President Carter's popular legacy as a "failed president." Forget about bombing oil-rich nations, jovial Jimmy never bombed anyone! Fool that he was, he actually worked on peace deals and went on TV to plead with the American people to divest themselves of the oil economy. Considering the "Windfall Profits tax” and those solar panels on the roof of the White House, Jimmy was obviously ill-suited for the Executive Branch. His short time in the Oval Office served as a real-time history lesson in geopolitics.

Not surprisingly, every president since Carter has dropped bombs on an oil-producing country. They've all proven their allegiance to the code words: "national interests." Words that actually mean corporate investment in the extraction of resources in far-off lands, and the use of their profitable, sometimes-affiliated investments in the defense industry to keep those resources secure.

Clinton did his part by continuously bombing Iraq and making certain that the UN inspectors got out before WMD compliance could be verified. It kept Iraq's oil in the ground and commodity prices from plummeting even lower than the 25 bucks per barrel we enjoyed during those economic glory days.

But, despite making bank on the Iraq Oil for Food program, Halliburton still couldn't openly do the deals they wanted with Libya and Iran, or maximize the potential of the Iraqi market. When Halliburton inserted Dick into the Oval orifice, their desires and, by extension, the desires of the entire industry were mapped out and methodically satisfied.

In 2004, it all came to a head in a remote Libyan turkey farm. It was there that Qaddafi stored his WMDs - supposedly ranging from mustard gas canisters to "centrifuge parts." The Great Quack of Libya renounced WMDs forever and, in rather quick succession, was dropped from the official list of terrorist nations and began striking deals with Halliburton and other oil industry partners.

It happened almost as quickly as the assault that followed the UN vote to protect Qaddafi's "own people" from his attacks. Luckily for the people of Libya, they cling to the surface of an oil rich land. This is something the people of Rwanda could not say…so we just watched as they ended up buried in their worthless soil.

Attacking your own people is no guarantee of US action.

We're still banking on the de facto dictators of Saudi Arabia and Bahrain. The military is not coiled to strike at those regimes and there are no votes pending in the UN, because they are too important to the corporations that profit from their power. No matter how greasy those palms might be, we will clench tightly until the bitter end.

Almost as tightly as Obama is trying to hold onto the Oval Office.

He's gone the extra mile. Gitmo is open for business. He's brought Guantanamo's naked, extra-legal imprisonment to American soil. He's kowtowed to Wall Street and extended tax relief to the rich. And he's dispelled any long-term speculation in the halls of Halliburton and their oily friends that his presidency is, like Carter before him, going to be a "failure." Not only did he bail them out on the Gulf Oil Spill, but he's also attacked an oil producing nation, thus positioning the White House to help determine who will need to be paid off once the bombing is over.

When it comes to the modern presidential checklist, no one can say he hasn't done his duty.


JP Sottile is a newsroom veteran. His credits include a stint on the Newshour news desk, C-SPAN, Executive Producer for ABC affiliate WJLA in Washington, and a two-time Washington Regional Emmy Award Winner. In addition, JP is a documentary filmmaker.

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+9 # X Dane 2011-03-21 21:14
WOW, that was one hell of a sarcastic rant.
The sarcasm is dripping and slurping all over the page. No matter what the president does he will be pummeled. If the citizens of Benghazi had been bombed into oblivion by Kadafi, Obama would be called a murderer.

With the bombing he is a stooge of the oil companies. Fox could not have done a better hatchet job than Mr. Sottile
 
 
+2 # buddy 2011-03-23 18:51
Agree 100% with X Dane. Any jackass can kick down a barn door, takes a carpenter to build one
 
 
+4 # Maggie 2011-03-21 21:17
Marvel-ous! I loved this! "They" are all so obvious, one can simply, easily state their game plainly....and then throw such satirical twists gave me quite a few laughs.

THank you
 
 
+10 # Activista 2011-03-21 22:30
excellent article - information overload - great facts and info.
"President Carter's popular legacy as a "failed president." Forget about bombing oil-rich nations, jovial Jimmy never bombed anyone! Fool that he was, he actually worked on peace ..." and had policy not to support dictators - and wanted just peace for Palestinians.
AIPAC did Carter in. And for Obama - impeach him - send him with Clintons to exile (but who will take them?)
 
 
+8 # KittatinyHawk 2011-03-22 13:08
Jimmy Carter was A Good Man, being a Good President doesnot seem to be a key matter.
 
 
+12 # hms 2011-03-22 00:26
Excellent piece--to be ignored by most in Washington--and the American public. Sad.
 
 
+14 # Heartbeatt 2011-03-22 02:52
Even worse, Obama has shown the voters who believed in him and trusted him that their dreams can be smashed to smithereens. That betrayal is a very painful thing to bear.
Who is Obama representing now?
 
 
+16 # in deo veritas 2011-03-22 05:38
WHO THE HELL IS CONGRESS REPRESENTING? certainly not us!
 
 
+12 # Observer 47 2011-03-22 06:02
Oh, that's an easy one. Obama is representing the oil companies, the banksters, and various other greedy corporations. And, as he has either caved on or actively supported many neocon policies, I'd say he represents all the Friends of Bush as well.
 
 
+3 # Doctoretty 2011-03-22 09:33
Some of you worshipped him as some kind of god...you should have known better. He is a man with flaws too. but I'll take him any day over what could have been!
 
 
+1 # Alison 2011-03-22 15:52
absolutely Doctoretty. devisive sarcasim does nothing to help on any issues you care about.
 
 
+4 # KittatinyHawk 2011-03-22 13:09
Who ever pays him. He is a GOP...no doubt about it
 
 
+8 # rm 2011-03-22 03:17
Yes, good point. Obama is now a REAL president -- that is, a war criminal who -- if we just had a justice system -- would spend the rest of his life in prison, right along side of Bush, Cheney, and all the rest of the neo-con crew.

How can people call Qaddafi "odd" or "strange" but never see that bombing one nation after is really odd, strange, criminal, sociopathic, and all the rest.
 
 
+7 # J.Lind 2011-03-22 05:03
And, if Kucinich were president would it be a different story?
I doubt it.

If anything, this piece makes it crystal clear where the real power is in this country.

OIL.

UNTIL IT IS ALL GONE, OIL THAT IS,NOTHING WILL CHANGE.

Then maybe alternatives will be brought to bear. A totally new bubble of engery systems until one or two shake out and be come a force of "nature".

It's the "nature" of things, don't you know?
 
 
+18 # BishopAndrew 2011-03-22 06:29
There are those who will defend Obama and claim as did Rachel Maddow on her wonderful programme last night that unlike all those who preceeded him Obama did not engage in "chest thumping". Rachel I rarely disagree with you but on this one you missed the bucket. I agree with Sottile on this one. Obama's may be a "kinder and gentler" capitulation to the oil companies but it is a capitulation nonetheless just like his wonderful "stomping his foot" against Wall Street, or his insistance in his campaign rhectoric that he would revise Bush era JD polocies which of course he not only did not revise or reverse but rather defended!
 
 
+6 # lnason@umassd.edu 2011-03-22 07:37
Congratulations -- more progressives need to see past Obama's charisma and style and soaring rhetoric to find the politician beneath.

Lee Nason
 
 
+2 # Alturn 2011-03-22 08:01
It is good to see that the motives for our overseas escapades are finally being seen. When you can joke about such truths, the power of those making the lies is nearing the end.

"“Oil is for prosperity, the good of the people. It is evil to use God’s gifts to destroy one another.”
"Where are the Europeans, the Americans and the Soviets now? Not in Africa or the Third World, because these areas have nothing to offer in oil or revenue. They call themselves the defenders of democracy and peace. But Maitreya calls them the Pretenders."
- World Teacher Maitreya through an associate as reported by Share International
 
 
+4 # genierae 2011-03-22 14:15
Alturn: To me oil is not good for the people, nor is it good for wildlife or the environment. Another oil spill was just discovered in the Gulf of Mexico, and I can't see any way that oil can be used safely. How can it be God's gift when it causes pollution that harms all living things?
 
 
+4 # lionsdenmother 2011-03-22 16:49
i worry if Obama doesn't play it their way they will take him out like they did the kennedy's, MLK , anyone that seemed like they cared more about America then about greedy millionaires now gazillioniers. JOkes on them hahaha the dollar isnt worth that much anymore. sad.
 
 
+3 # GarnTurner 2011-03-22 17:09
Gee, guys, don't you see how it works? The Army and the Marines have their wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, but what is the Navy and Air Force supposed to do, sit on their thumbs? They need a war, too, or else when it's time for budgetary considerations they might get left behind. No military force left behind! Who should the Coast Guard attack?
 
 
+3 # tomo 2011-03-23 10:10
Three comments:
1) The most original observation is "Carter didn't bomb anyone," and so became a "failed presidency." That gives one a lot to think about.
2) The motivations for our bombing of Libya parallel issues over Cuba in the war against Spain. That war was sold to Americans as a way to protect the Cubans against the evil Spaniards. But before Cubans could ratify a constitution, we managed to insert into their constitution a clause guaranteeing our veto power over their affairs. Likewise now there may be genuine humanitarian concern for Libyan freedom fighters, but I feel confident Sottile is right: the stronger motive is to protect "national interests" (read: Haliburton and the oil gang)--something Qaddafi is no longer able to do for us.
3) The article stokes the debate about what we got when we elected Obama. Comments from both sides of the debate show up above. I'm with the side among whom the conviction is arising that when we Democrats elected Obama, we LOST the White House. There were two servants of the corporatocracy running against each other in 2008. One told us he was a Republican, albeit a rather quirky, independent, unpredictable one. The other presented himself as a spirited advocate of reform. Electing the far more deceptive of the two, many of us are reluctant to acknowledge how badly we've been betrayed.
 
 
+4 # mtnview 2011-03-24 18:41
This is not a defense of Obama. However, there is a pattern of capitulation that progressives need to acknowledge-- so that we can understand how to counteract. When the Supreme Court inserted itself into the 2000 election and handed the election to Bush2, Gore vowed to fight. This lasted 3 weeks, and then Gore became very quiet and all but disappeared for a few years. When Kerry lost via fraud in 2004, he vowed to fight, and was silenced within 3 days. Obama claimed to repressent the progressive cause, but his early appointments of Berneke and Geithner were huge clues that he, too, had sucumbed. We need to learn what the threat is to any leader? Is it threats to family and children? Why are all 3 of this men, so quickly brought to heel? and how do we change this?
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.