Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Lisa P. Jackson writes: "Americans must once again stand up for their right to clean air and clean water. Since the beginning of this year, Republicans in the House have averaged roughly a vote every day the chamber has been in session to undermine the Environmental Protection Agency and our nation's environmental laws."

The Los Angeles Basin is far from meeting federal pollution standards. (photo: Francine Orr /Los Angeles Times)
The Los Angeles Basin is far from meeting federal pollution standards. (photo: Francine Orr /Los Angeles Times)



Too Dirty to Fail

By Lisa P. Jackson, Los Angeles Times

21 October 11

 

mericans must once again stand up for their right to clean air and clean water.

Since the beginning of this year, Republicans in the House have averaged roughly a vote every day the chamber has been in session to undermine the Environmental Protection Agency and our nation's environmental laws. They have picked up the pace recently — just last week they voted to stop the EPA's efforts to limit mercury and other hazardous pollutants from cement plants, boilers and incinerators — and it appears their campaign will continue for the foreseeable future.

Using the economy as cover, and repeating unfounded claims that "regulations kill jobs," they have pushed through an unprecedented rollback of the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act and our nation's waste-disposal laws, all of which have successfully protected our families for decades. We all remember "too big to fail"; this pseudo jobs plan to protect polluters might well be called "too dirty to fail."

The House has voted on provisions that, if they became law, would give big polluters a pass in complying with the standards that more than half of the power plants across the country already meet. The measures would indefinitely delay sensible upgrades to reduce air pollution from industrial boilers located in highly populated areas. And they would remove vital federal water protections, exposing treasured resources such as the Gulf of Mexico, Lake Erie, the Chesapeake Bay and the Los Angeles River to pollution.

How we respond to this assault on our environmental and public health protections will mean the difference between sickness and health — in some cases, life and death — for hundreds of thousands of citizens.

This is not hyperbole. The link between health issues and pollution is irrefutable. Mercury is a neurotoxin that affects brain development in unborn children and young people. Lead has similar effects in our bodies. Soot, composed of particles smaller across than a human hair, is formed when fuels are burned and is a direct cause of premature death. Nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds contribute to the ozone alert days when seniors, asthmatics and others with respiratory problems are at serious risk if they do nothing more dangerous than step outside and breathe the air.

"Too dirty to fail" tries to convince Americans that they must choose between their health and the economy, a choice that's been proved wrong for the four decades that the EPA has been in existence. No credible economist links our current economic crisis — or any economic crisis — to tough clean-air and clean-water standards.

A better approach is the president's call for federal agencies to ensure that regulations don't overburden American businesses. The EPA has already put that into effect by repealing or revising several unnecessary rules, while ensuring that essential health protections remain intact.

We can put Americans to work retrofitting outdated, dirty plants with updated pollution control technology. There are about 1,100 coal-fired units at about 500 power plants in this country. About half of these units are more than 40 years old, and about three-quarters of them are more than 30 years old. Of these 1,100 units, 44% do not use pollution controls such as scrubbers or catalysts to limit emissions, and they pour unlimited amounts of mercury, lead, arsenic and acid gases into our air. Despite requirements in the bipartisan 1990 Clean Air Act amendments, these facilities have largely refused to control their emissions — creating an uneven playing field for companies who play by the rules and gaming the system at the expense of our health.

If these plants continue to operate without pollution limits, as a legislative wish list from House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) would allow, there will be more cases of asthma, respiratory illness and premature deaths — with no clear path to new jobs.

By contrast, the nation's first-ever standards for mercury and other air toxic pollutants which the EPA will finalize this fall — and which the Republican leadership aims to block — are estimated to create 31,000 short-term construction jobs and 9,000 long-term jobs in the utility sector through modernizing power plants. And the savings in health benefits are estimated to be up to $140 billion per year by 2016.

Contrary to industry lobbying, this overhaul can be accomplished without affecting the reliability of our power grid.

Our country has a long tradition of treating environmental and public health protections as nonpartisan matters. It was the case when President Nixon created the EPA and signed into law the historic Clean Air Act, when President Ford signed into law the Safe Drinking Water Act and when President George H.W. Bush oversaw important improvements to the Clean Air Act and enacted the trading program that dramatically reduced acid rain pollution.

Our environment affects red states and blue states alike. It is time for House Republicans to stop politicizing our air and water. Let's end "too dirty to fail."

Lisa P. Jackson is the administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

 

Comments  

 
-23 # MidwestTom 2011-10-21 19:58
Nobody is against clean air and water, however, many are against the EPA as it now exists. Several years ago I was involved in a processing plant that utilized three very large compressors. During maintenance there always was some oil spillage. The plant drains all went to a sump which overflowed into a series of oil/water separating subs. The system worked perfectly, and had for over ten years. however, the EPA inspector did not approve of the design and force the company to tear it out and put bales of straw in the stream next to the plant to collect any spilled oil. When the water got high water flowed around and over the straw and small amounts oil passed on down the stream. The company was then fined for polluting the stream. Idiots in the field is the largest problem with the EPA, and why industry hates them.
 
 
+23 # tomo 2011-10-22 05:55
Midwest: Somehow I think your negative incident is disproportionat ely influencing your judgment. "Mrs. Jones gets up at 5 every morning, cleans the house, prepares meals for her husband and three children, gets the kids off to school in a timely and cheerful way, sews clothes, volunteers as a cross-walk guard, visits her elderly mother, works diligently at fund-raising for cancer research; but she tends to over cook the vegetables. This is why many are against Mrs. Jones."
 
 
+3 # KittatinyHawk 2011-10-22 18:57
Perhaps you should sit down with yur family and drink the oil and show us all how safe it is.
I have seen the bs maintenance not done esp filters in stacks. I live near a superfund site where animals and people died. Too bad the creeps in charge didnot

When i woreked in sheet metal we had spillage and grease also come out...know what we did, we applied sand, cleaned up the sand, put it in special barrels that went to special landfills that were no bargain but we didnot let it go into the local wells, streams Guess us North Easterners have a conscience
 
 
-1 # noitall 2011-10-24 12:29
MidwestTom continues to show who butters his bread. Any more industrial talking points? Take them someplace else, you're writing to some informed people on this site.
 
 
+26 # BLBreck 2011-10-21 20:19
These dirty corporations have two choices on this issue: they can spend millions upon millions to hire lobbyists and buy off our representatives to fight against regulations, or they can spend those same millions to comply with regulations, create jobs, save people's lives and bring down the nation's healthcare costs (and their own if they have the largess in them, or have somehow been forced to include health insurance for their workers.)
The choice they have made is obvious. Do they wonder why there are people protesting against them all over the world?!!! I not only think they are heartless and devoid of any social ethics whatsoever, I think they are legally insane.
 
 
+1 # KittatinyHawk 2011-10-22 19:02
If most of them would just clean up after each shift. Maintenance like they tell the IRS perhaps their costs would be less.

I live near an area where the main problems were they refused in cement industry to change their filters/baghouses, fined constantly. It would have been cheaper, safer to change the bags.
I know people whose family worked at quick tan Corporations. Their family bled orange thru sweat at night. Poor quality of life...company blamed cigarettes. This was a half a century ago...long time we have been poisoned, then we cleaned it up, water just coming back in streams Well, guess the fisherman and hunters just do not care again

Let them drink the Monsanto GE GMO by Products, the Fracking compounds Let them prove how safe their products are
 
 
-1 # noitall 2011-10-24 12:35
They do not look to the future. They plan and spend for the quarter, the boss is rewarded for profits, the people stay on the job, stockholders sock away more $, all is "well" with the world. It doesn't matter if their sin today causes them $ next quarter. They are sweating bullets for this quarter; next quarter will be considered then and only then. By then, they will have bought the legislation needed to sweep this quarter's sins under the table. Its the American way, the New World Order. All the world is our trash can.
 
 
+23 # usedtobesupermom 2011-10-21 20:21
Those bastards have no right to poison us. They have no right to INTENTIONALLY make us sick. They have no right to kill us!
They need to be forced to suffer themselves what they are forcing on us.

They need to be forced along with their families to bathe,swim & drink toxic water they want to force us to use. They should be made to live next door to the polluters and breath the air 24/7.
And they should be made to eat the contaminated food they allow to sicken the people of this country.

What they need is to do their job working for US- not killing us and robbing us blind in behalf of their pimps!
 
 
+8 # Futilitarian 2011-10-21 20:56
Simply stated... "Friggin' idiots!" What else can be said that could be more efficient or concise?
 
 
+21 # Regina 2011-10-21 21:09
The cheater tycoons wouldn't demand a football game without referees, a baseball game without umpires, or a tennis match without line judges. Their fetishist objection to "regulation" is a put-on to hide detrimental practices that feed them huge net profits, for the simple reason that they have not made needed investments into humanly decent operating methods. They're hooked on getting something for nothing, and the human tolls aren't entered into their books. It's time for Clean Up Or Clean Out.
 
 
+15 # Vardoz 2011-10-21 21:47
I called the Obama comment line ad said his failure to pass the jobs act only shows how powerful the congress is under its current majority. It is clear why the prize they want the most is a majority in the house and senate and while the nation is distracted by the presidential race the GOP is working hard to steal the house and congress. WE MUST NOT LET THAT HAPPEN!
 
 
+12 # Andrew 2011-10-21 21:55
Welcome to the third world!
 
 
+17 # X Dane 2011-10-21 22:21
What??.... The republicans no longer need to breathe??... I know they don't give a damn about the middle class and poor,... so we get killed by the bad air and polluted water...so what,

NEWSFLASH! It will kill you too. and Mercury will also affect YOUR babies. We are having enough trouble. We can't handle having a lot of babies born with defect brains because you republicans do not want power plants and cement factories cleaning up their acts.

It is unbelievable the EPA that NIXON started, for heaven's sake. a Republican president did SOMETHING right.
And now the republicans want to eliminate the EPA???? and destroy our health. Killing thousands and overwhelm our already strained healthcare system.
 
 
+13 # Holyone 2011-10-22 05:10
Thank you Lisa. This is a very informative article and one that needed to be out there.
 
 
+14 # jcstilley2003@yahoo.com 2011-10-22 07:51
@MidwestTom. If we need better training for EPA field reps, then let's work for that. Let's not destroy 40 years of hard-won progress. Let's tweak what we have for the better. I agree with Regina. This is about PROFIT. If we reduce regulation, they make more money. And there is no doubt -- that money will not trickle down. It will go to the richest few people in each business. When Americans get sicker from more pollution the health care companies profit. Is that a noble and honorable plan – to make Americans sick so we can profit from it? Vardoz, Andrew, and XDane are on the right track. We, the people, must turn out in massive numbers to vote this current batch of Republicans out of office. Every election will be crucial, from your state house to the Federal Congress. Right now I sincerely believe these Republicans will continue selling the middle class down the drain. We, the 99%, must work a two-track agenda: first we find Americans who will run for office and support the middle class, and second to get Democrats elected until we have better candidates. Otherwise the middle class will continue to shrink.
 
 
0 # KittatinyHawk 2011-10-22 19:03
My feet are tired, my fingers...we did work hard to get where we are...so easy to sign a piece of paper and kill
So much for these Christians and other Faiths who can destroy in one swipe of a Pen what the Creator gave us.
 
 
0 # KittatinyHawk 2011-10-22 18:52
I would like to watch them drink Round Up with their Families...OB down the line.
they want to force it on us, then let us see them go first. Perhaps a Christmas or New Years Toast! Media included to join with them...come on Monsanto and GE let us all watch you Drink UP

I do wonder just where they will live, what they will be breathing. They absolutely do not even care about their family, so how can you trust them?

The water will be poisoned, even organic farms will be poisoned within 5 years, The Animals will go first...Enjoy that NRA no more hunting... Game Commissions and wildlife will be on that unemployment line also. Zoos, Parks...they do not care and never have. We have been experiments for decades people. Why do you think there is disease...their labs love experimenting and we are the experiments

Time we turn that table around...Get people registered to Vote and get them to the Polls
 
 
-1 # fredboy 2011-10-24 05:00
It's fascinating: the Rethugs and Teanatics seem hellbent on choking and poisoning their grandkids to death.
 
 
+2 # larry, dfh 2011-10-24 18:03
This is from the same EPA administrator who blessed the dumping of a million gallons of butyl cellosolve in the Gulf of Mexico. This is from the head of the EPA who went along with weakening the Clean Air Act so her President could claim that he was doing something about 'jobs'. The article is a political hit-job. I'm sorry, but Lisa Jackson is nothing but a self-promoting political hack.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.