Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Wall Street Journal CEO Les Hinton has resigned. Matt Wells of the Guardian UK writes, "Every time Murdoch ditches a key executive, the flames of scandal flick ever closer to him."

Les Hinton and Rupert Murdoch in 2002. Hinton headed News International when the News of the World phone-hacking allegations first arose. (photo: PA)
Les Hinton and Rupert Murdoch in 2002. Hinton headed News International when the News of the World phone-hacking allegations first arose. (photo: PA)



Worst Is Yet to Come for News Corp.

By Matt Wells, Guardian UK

16 July 11

 

Les Hinton sacrificed, but the worst is yet to come for News Corp. Every time Murdoch ditches a key executive, the flames of scandal flick ever closer to him.

o relationship is safe, no loyal bond strong enough for Rupert Murdoch who - looking more than the sum of his 80 years - is mounting a final battle to save the company he built from nothing.

His decision to throw Les Hinton to the wolves is his most dramatic move yet. For more than 50 years, as a journalist and then an executive, Hinton loyally served the Murdoch empire from its roots in Australia to the height of its power in New York.

Now, in a desperate effort to save News Corporation's most valuable assets - its 27 US broadcast licences and the 20th Century Fox movie studio - Murdoch is prepared to sacrifice one of his closest allies.

The problem for Murdoch is that every time he ditches a key executive, the flames of scandal flick ever closer to him.

Hinton was ditched because he was the crucial link between Murdoch's valuable US businesses and the tainted operation in Britain. He was at the helm of NI - the holding company for his UK newspapers including the News of the World and the Times - when it seemed that everyone who was in sniffing distance of a significant news story found their phones being hacked.

Questions were being raised about what Hinton knew about corrupt payments to London police officers: if he was shown to have been aware of them, that would be a felony in the US under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

The problem for News Corp now is that, at every stage, its attempts to contain this story have failed. The decision to close the News of the World was motivated in part to save the chief executive of NI, Rebekah Brooks: that decision bombed and Brooks resigned on Friday.

But the departure of Brooks was not enough to contain the scandal in Britain, so Hinton, who has been more significant to the company's fortunes and to Murdoch personally for far longer than Brooks, also left.

The inevitable next move for Murdoch is prolicide. His son James, appointed in 2007 as chairman and chief executive of News Corporation's operations in Europe and Asia, based at News International's headquarters in Wapping, east London, clings on - but only for now.

In London, James Murdoch oversaw the response to the hacking scandal. He approved the £700,000 hush money paid to Gordon Taylor, the former chief executive of the Professional Footballers' Association - a decision he has blamed on poor advice. (The legal director of News International, Tom Crone, was one of the executives of News International to leave this week.)

The departure of Hinton suggests that News Corporation has finally got to grips with the global significance of this story, but the worst is yet to come. The FBI has launched an investigation into accusations that News of the World journalists asked a former New York police officer for the phone records of relatives of 9/11 victims. If that toxic allegation is shown to have been true, one thing is certain: Fox News is finished, along with the rest of News Corporation as we know it.

The emotional supercharge of 9/11 in the US is many times greater than Milly Dowler in the UK - and look what happened here.

Commentators have compared the crisis to Watergate; Carl Bernstein, the former Washington Post reporter whose revelations helped depose a US president, says it is evident to him the events of the past week "are the beginning, not the end, of the seismic event".

To coin a famous Murdoch newspaper headline: will the last person to leave News Corporation turn off the lights?

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+61 # ER444 2011-07-16 08:10
Fox News might be finished? A day to celebrate!!!
 
 
+14 # lark3650 2011-07-16 08:28
The law of reaction is a mighty power for good and bad in the lives of all living creatures. Good actions lead to good reactions. Bad actions lead to bad reactions. As you give, so you receive.
 
 
+3 # Texas Aggie 2011-07-17 19:48
In other words, what goes around, comes around. karma is a bitch.
 
 
+24 # doggone 2011-07-16 09:04
So, James Murdoch was given poor advice? I bet that will hold up in court, he's an adult right?, the head of this multinational business and the poor guy didn't know better ? I'll believe it when pigs can fly!
 
 
+7 # Merschrod 2011-07-16 10:35
I think that most youth and petty crook should try to cop that plea. Remonds me of West Side Story - remember the fellow who claimed that he had a social disease? Well, these klepto-conservative mongers seem to have a class disease - poor upringing leads to this?
 
 
+41 # Archie1954 2011-07-16 09:16
Oh please let it be true, no more Faux "News" to slander and obfuscate, lie and spin. I'll be ready to crack the champagne if it comes true.
 
 
+9 # SouthBrun 2011-07-16 10:11
Praise be to the Hounds to stay in the hunt for the elusive Fox for the scent is strong.
 
 
+22 # jon 2011-07-16 10:56
If the Republicans had any presence of mind they would join the Democrats in a unified front to expose the most powerful non-elected person in the world, Murdoch.

Because the Republicans are each, individually, prey to his machine. To paraphrase Ben Franklin - I think it was - who said: "Gentlemen, unless we all hang together, we will surely hang individually".
 
 
+8 # humanmancalvin 2011-07-16 14:57
Jon...Great thought & it makes logical sense, that is why it will never happen. One generally does not bite the hand that is feeding it. Imagine the dirt Murdoch has on his much ballyhooed Republican party members?

The very thought of this Goebells-like Faux-News being legally banned from the airwaves is way too much to hope for. I may see Santa Claus come shooting down my chimney first, and I live in Florida & do not even have a chimney.

The almighty dollar is just that, almighty. Apparently the British Pound although quite coveted may not have the same feeding frenzy affect on British politicos as it does on this side of the pond.

Perchance to dream, the largest source of American propaganda & creator of hate gone? Ahhhh...what a Merry Christmas that would be!
 
 
0 # minmouse 2011-07-19 06:03
Isn't it questionable that the whistleblower is dead? ummm, interesting. crooks like Murdock always get off but I wonder where all those clowns on Fox will get a job now???
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.