Jesse Jackson writes: "Madison, like Selma, is not a major city. It isn't Chicago or New York or Los Angeles. And it isn't Cairo. It is the epicenter of the battle for America's democracy, and it is as American as Lexington, Concord, Gettysburg, Montgomery and Selma."
Protestors shout outside the office of Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, 02/22/11. (photo: Darren Hauck/Reuters)
Assault on Unions Is Attack on Civil Rights
23 February 11
t looks like "Cairo has moved to Madison," said conservative Republican Rep. Paul Ryan, as 50,000 citizens took over the state's Capitol building. He got the spirit right, but the location wrong. In Madison, folks wearing Packers jerseys stand together with folks wearing Bears colors. Madison is this generation's Selma, the epicenter for the modern battle for basic human rights.
In 1965, the drive for basic voting rights was stalled in the U.S. Senate. President Johnson pushed Martin Luther King to stop demonstrating. Instead, Dr. King went to Selma. Selma was not a big city, but it held a mirror to the nation. There, on Bloody Sunday, peaceful demonstrators were met with dogs, clubs and hoses, and touched the conscience of a nation. Two days later, Johnson, invoking the famous words, "We shall overcome," introduced the Voting Rights Act. Five months later it was signed into law.
Today, the assault on basic rights is accelerating. The economic collapse caused by the gambols of Wall Street destabilizes public budgets at every level, as tax receipts plummet and expenses caused by unemployment rise. Yet Wall Street gets bailed out, and working and poor people are squeezed to pay to clean up their mess.
In states across the country, conservatives have used this occasion to assail public workers and their unions. They demand not only rollback of pay and benefits, but push laws to cripple - if not ban - public employee unions, destroying the right of workers to organize and bargain collectively.
Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin, a self-described "Tea Party governor," leads the most egregious of these efforts. Upon election, he signed into law millions in tax breaks for business. Then, pointing to the budget crisis, he demanded not only harsh concessions from public workers - dramatic hikes in what they pay for pensions and health care - but crippling limits on their right to negotiate, limits on any pay increases and an annual vote to see if the union survives. As if to flaunt his power grab, he exempted the unions - police and firefighters - that endorsed him in the election.
The right to organize, to bargain collectively and to strike are basic human rights enshrined in international law. To this day, the U.S. champions independent free trade unions across the world - even as Walker and his ilk seek to crush them at home. With the U.S. suffering more extreme inequality than Egypt, and the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United giving corporations and billionaires a free pass to distort our elections, unions are virtually the only counter that workers have. That's why the right has targeted unions; that is why every citizen has a stake in their survival.
In Wisconsin, the public employees accepted the harsh concessions demanded by the governor, but rejected the attack on their basic rights. Teachers, nurses and other public workers stood up. Democratic state legislators left the state, blocking the effort to ram the legislation through. Students, ministers and progressives rallied to their side. The demonstrations are now entering their second week. Across the country, just as in the civil rights movement, people of conscience are holding vigils and protests in support. This is a Martin Luther King moment.
The effort by the governor and his right-wing allies to divide private sector workers from public sector workers is an old trick. In the South, race was used to divide. The tricks perfected in the South - right-to-work laws, barriers to unions - are now coming north.
Madison, like Selma, is not a major city. It isn't Chicago or New York or Los Angeles. And it isn't Cairo. It is the epicenter of the battle for America's democracy, and it is as American as Lexington, Concord, Gettysburg, Montgomery and Selma.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |












Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
STOP MAKING THINGS UP!
Show me one example where a person on the left has ever, EVER, made such statements. I don't want hearsay. I want a real quote.
You will not find it.
You guys (and gals) keep saying the left makes all these wild accusations. We don't and we won't.
STOP MAKING THINGS UP!
If you watch the news coverage you will see printed posters of Walker cum Hitlerian mustache or Walker with gun crosshairs superimposed on his head.
The instances where leftists have accused conservatives of "fascism" or "dementia" or "authoritarianis m" or acts of violence are too numerous to cite.
This country has a long history of political hyperbole starting with our founding fathers and continuing nearly continuously to the present day. I personally find this sort of speech to be OK for both conservatives and progressives but if you wish to criticize the right for such language, you must also criticize the left lest you be charged with hypocrisy.
Lee Nason
New Bedford, Massachusetts
"One of the most elemental human rights [is] the right to belong to a free trade union." -Ronald Reagan
In suppressing trade unionism and collective bargaining, threatening to use the national guard to suppress the tens of thousands trade union protesters in Wisconsin, in sending out the state police to pursue Democrats who are standing up for Regan's words in defense of trade unionism and threatening to fire workers if the unions don't agree to give up collective bargaining - among other betrayals to Reagan's words - Walker is committing the No. 1 unforgivable Republican crime: He's defiling the legacy of Reagan.
In fact, in his 1982 statement, Reagan even discussed how the Solidarity Union sought God-given rights.
So, is Walker not only throwing mud at Reagan, but also defying God?
The American dream was achieved by giving workers a decent salary and share in the growth and prosperity of the country and the Union were instrumental in achieving those results.
If I were rich, I would be ashamed of myself for not putting in a good share of dollars into the system so that the country I want to live in doesn't become another Mexico, where there is a miniscule middle class, and where the money is still mostly in the hands of the original families that were given land grants and became wealthy, and who remain to this day very condescending to their poor.
The entitlements and birthrights benefitters are not in the middle class or the poor.
Walker may not be a Hitler but he is also not as well educated or as smart as any of those teachers that are standing strong to retain some dignity. He is a purchased Governor of the Koch Bros and other corporatists though, and he needs to be recalled.
Food is a birthright. nobody can survive very long without it.
Water is a birthright. You'll die even sooner without water than you will without food.
Shelter is a birthright. Most places in this country it is very difficult to survive the cold months without shelter. And in some areas one won't survive very long in the heat without shelter.
Social contact is a birthright. It is proven that depriving humans contact with others drives them insane.
These are all things that corporate greed wants to deny to human beings who make less than a Million dollars a year.
Let's start in Wisconsin and roll across the entire nation.
Walker and his pimp (fake Koch) talk - this is there agenda - great guerrilla move.
The states that have the strongest Union presence in their schools are the one that achieve the highest.
I think we should emulate success. Unless of course, your hatred of Unions is so deep that you would rather our children get a lesser education than have to actually negotiate with teachers. The choice is clear every time, and yet so many do not seem to care.
http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ617440
http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ617440
I tried to look the reference up (since the claim is not compatible with the studies I've seen on the issue) but it was removed from the site. But I gather from hints that the study only considered public schools. If that is true, than you can arguable make that claim that regular unionized public schools do about as well as non-union charter schools. But you are looking at the bottom of the barrel to make this comparison. You also to need to look at the non-union private, parochial, and homeschool arrangements which all lead to much better educational outcomes.
Lee Nason
New Bedford, Massachusetts
"Comparison of standardized test scores and degree of teacher unionization in states found a statistically significant and positive relationship between the presence of teacher unions and stronger state performance on tests. Taking into account the percentage of students taking the tests, states with greater percentages of teachers in unions reported higher test performance. (Contains 95 references.) (SK)"
An old friend was extremely disappointed with the Catholic schools in Los Angeles when her children were being (un)educated (while I was attending public school in the same area).
I have been very satisfied with _my_ public school education (1960-1972), and did not find most of _my_ teachers to be 'bottom of the barrel'.
Be Well,
Bob Griffin
Since Reagan's first tax cuts for the rich (which he partially reversed the next year because, even with his failing mind, he realized that they were too deep) we started a downward slide, and it's been getting worse ever since.
I believe that your claim that unionized public schools have the highest achievement levels, in inaccurate. From everything I have read, private schools and home schooling produce the highest achievement levels with parochial schools coming in next and with charter schools and unionized public schools coming in dead last in a virtual dead heat. Since private schools, home school parents, and parochial school teachers are not unionized, I think your claim is false.
Lee Nason
Home Schooling is sufficienitly uneven that my brother, who had taken his children out of the public schools in a blue collar neighborhood in Hawaii, was tempted to return them to the schools on finding that the students in the local home schooling group _must_ learn Creationist biology. (He got his degree in Bio-chem).
Be Well,
Bob Griffin
Be Well,
Bob Griffin
It is good to see Americans standing up for principles when there is truly something on the line far more significant than joining a scheduled march featuring people dressed in Revolutionary War costume. A line is being drawn. Let us hope that the citizens of the United States have what it takes to say to our increasingly intrusive government: this much, and no more.
The difficulty arrives when unions form in the public sector. Because they have a "monopoly" (whether for garbage collection or teaching or roadwork) and because they can often "elect" their own bosses and labor agreement negotiators, there is a tendency for them to get more than they would if there were competition. Their monopoly position is strengthened in the public sector because
any worker unrest can disrupt the whole population (whether we are talking schooling the kids or removing the snow) so various government administrations simply give them what they ask for rather than face of the adverse social impacts that the unions could cause.
I'm not sure that I have a good answer to this dilemma but it is not constructive to claim that one side or the other is completely correct. This is one of the issues that we need adult conversation about if we are to achieve good public services at equitable costs.
Lee Nason
New Bedford, Massachusetts
Your rant was based on phony logic and I think you know it! What about Sanitation workers; would you do their job?
The only end of the road is the end of people paying their fair share. We have an income problem, and I think you know it.
Unions have sat down (as they are trying to do in WI) to negotiate every time there is an issue that threatens their jobs. But you ignore that fact?
Bad management almost killed Detroit. Sorry, VERY BAD management almost destroyed Detroit. The workers didn't build outdated factories, overspend on developing cars nobody wanted or spent more time & $$ fighting CAFE requirements when they could have made a difference. And I still think you that.
Notice in the article, it points out that "Upon election, he signed into law millions in tax breaks for business." Okay, it's like the unwise continuation of the Bush tax cuts. Give the revenue away and then complain 'cause there's no money?
That's simply irresponsible, and the Governor thinks he can get away with this? We're here to say NO! We get it, and aren't going to stand for it.
What is it that you don't understand? Government exists at the pleasure of the electorate - not the other way 'round. The public is NOT happy!
Who's being asked to sacrifice in Wisconsin? Management or the Unions?
Why not BUST MANAGEMENT instead??
If both federal and state income tax rates returned to those under Reagan (YES, Reagan, although under Ike would be fairer) there would be no problem. But the propaganda spewed unrelentingly by the Koch heads seems to have convinced the gullible that someone else, usually a poor working guy like themselves, is unfairly taking too much at their expense.
Thus do the Walkers, Kasiches, Daniels, plus the tea baggers in service to their own further impoverishment, practice the ancient art of divide and conquer. It's pretty clear that Davie, Chuckie and their coddled, spoiled, rich kid buddies really believe they are entitled to rule over the undeserving rabble. And they seem to be imposing that belief on a lot of the people whom they're hurting.
Yes, the five states that do not have collective bargaining are the ones that have the lowest SAT/ACT scores. We are on our way to the bottom helped along by people who too centered to try to help anyone.
The amount of money spent on schools does not necessarily mean the kids are smarter. I lived in a town in Connecticut years ago that spent less per student than any of the 24 school districts around them, but their students scored higher on the SATs than the other districts.
RSS feed for comments to this post.