Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Dana Milbank begins: "On Friday, the unemployment rate dropped to 8.8 percent, as businesses added jobs for the 13th straight month. On Wednesday, Fox News announced that it was ending Glenn Beck's daily cable-TV show. These are not unrelated events."

Glen Beck whipping up the FOX News crowd, 03/29/09. (image: Fox News)
Glen Beck whipping up the FOX News crowd, 03/29/09. (image: Fox News)



Why Glenn Beck Lost It

By Dana Milbank, The Washington Post

10 April 11

 

n Friday, the unemployment rate dropped to 8.8 percent, as businesses added jobs for the 13th straight month.

On Wednesday, Fox News announced that it was ending Glenn Beck's daily cable-TV show.

These are not unrelated events.

When Beck's show made its debut on Fox News Channel in January 2009, the nation was in the throes of an economic collapse the likes of which had not been seen since the 1930s. Beck's angry broadcasts about the nation's imminent doom perfectly rode the wave of fear that had washed across the nation, and the relatively unknown entertainer suddenly had 3 million viewers a night - and tens of thousands answering his call to rally at the Lincoln Memorial.

But as the recession began to ease, Beck's apocalyptic forecasts and ominous conspiracies became less persuasive, and his audience began to drift away. Beck responded with a doubling-down that ultimately brought about his demise on Fox.

He pushed further into dark conspiracies, urging his viewers to hoard food in their homes and to buy freeze-dried meals for sustenance when civilization breaks down. He spun a conspiracy theory in which the American left was in cahoots with an emerging caliphate in the Middle East. And, most ominously, he began to traffic regularly in anti-Semitic themes.

This vile turn for Beck reached its logical extreme two weeks ago, when he devoted his entire show to a conspiracy theory about various bankers, including the Rothschilds, to create the Federal Reserve. To make this case, Beck hosted the conspiracy theorist G. Edward Griffin, who has publicly argued that the anti-Semitic tract "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" "accurately describes much of what is happening in our world today."

Griffin's Web site dabbles in a variety of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, including his view that "present-day political Zionists are promoting the New World Order."

A month earlier, Beck, on his radio program, had described Reform rabbis as "generally political in nature," adding: "It's almost like Islam, radicalized Islam in a way."

A few months before that, he had attacked the Jewish billionaire George Soros, a Holocaust survivor, as a "puppet master" and read descriptions of him as an "unscrupulous profiteer" who "sucks the blood from people." Beck falsely called Soros "a collaborator" with Nazis who "saw people into the gas chambers."

Fox deserves credit for finally putting an end to this. Its joint statement with Beck's production company, claiming that they will "work together to develop and produce a variety of television projects," is almost certainly window-dressing; you can be confident Fox won't have Beck reopening what his Fox News colleague Shepard Smith dubbed the "fear chamber."

In banishing Beck, about whom I wrote a critical book last year, Fox has made an important distinction: It's one thing to promote partisan journalism, but it's entirely different to engage in race baiting and fringe conspiracy claims. Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity may have their excesses, but their mainstream conservatism is in an entirely different category from Beck.

Fox has rightly, if belatedly, declared that there is no place for Beck's messages on its airwaves, and Beck will return to the fringes, where such ideas have always existed. Because his end-of-the-world themes will no longer be broadcast by a mainstream outlet, there will be less of a chance for him to inspire off-balance characters to violence.

There are, happily, signs that the influences that undermined Beck are doing the same to other purveyors of fear. The March Washington Post-ABC News poll found that Sarah Palin's favorability rating among Republicans and Republican-leaning independents had dropped to 58 percent from 70 percent in October and 88 percent in 2008. Her negative ratings among Republicans are higher than those of other prospective Republican presidential candidates.

In another indication of abating anger, a CNN poll released last week found that the percentage of the public viewing the Tea Party unfavorably had increased to 47 percent, from 26 percent in January 2010. Thirty-two percent have a favorable view.

Beck, in losing his mass-media perch, is repeating the history of Father Charles Coughlin, the radio priest of the Great Depression. Economic hardship gave him an audience even greater than Beck's, but as his calls to drive "the money changers from the temple" became more vitriolic, his broadcast sponsors dropped him. He gradually faded from relevance as his angry themes lost their hold on Americans and his anti-Semitism became more pronounced.

It is a sign of the nation's health and resilience that Beck, after 27 months at Fox, is meeting a similar end.

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+104 # muskokajpm 2011-04-10 17:55
The question remains, why did they have him in the first place? Surely, just a brief scan of his manufactured blackboard diagrams leading nowhere except to completely unfounded tirades against respected social analysts-Frances Fox Piven and R.A Cloward, for one example. The George Soros attacks were ridiculous. Beck was too unhinged even for Fox.
 
 
+21 # Peter J. Nickitas 2011-04-10 21:37
Beck runs aground finally on anti-Semitism. But why was he able to sail so long with foul, racist following winds in his sails?

Critique of the Federal Reserve merits long discussion. Mr. Soros and Jim Rogers profited handsomely in crashing the British pound in 1992. Mr. Soros has no discernible moral revulsion at HaShoah. Beck was not off-base.

Beck leaves the military-industrial-financial complex alone, by and large.

He comes unhinged because of the absence of integrity, or moral consistency, in his analysis. His pro-business politics wears thin and shows an anti-Jewish streak. He loses his job because of poor ratings. He was, however, spared the fate of the Peter Finch character in Network who lost his life live on television, on account of poor ratings.

He loses his splendid megaphone. Others will take his place. Will the public give them the hearing they do not deserve?
 
 
+5 # PJ Nickitas 2011-04-12 20:01
Good critique.

He loses his job because he loses money for FOX.
 
 
+57 # bcmarshall 2011-04-10 21:45
Does anyone think it's strange that he accused Obama of racism and...no reaction? He speaks of Muslims in ugly terms. No reaction.

But he makes comments about Jews and suddenly he's racist?

Coincidence? I don't think so.
 
 
+46 # genierae 2011-04-11 06:43
I don't watch Glenn Beck, so I don't know what his remarks were concerning Jews. But what does anti-Semitic really mean? If I am outraged by the murderous actions of the Israeli government, and I speak from that outrage, does that make me anti-Semitic? If so, that kind of charge is a gag order which keeps people quiet while Israel continues its rampage against the Palestinians.
 
 
+1 # AndreM5 2011-04-11 07:02
The Palestinians are also Semites. How does that fit your theory?
 
 
+40 # DaveW 2011-04-11 08:12
AndreM5, Palestinians have been on the short end of a long whacking stick, primarily provided by the U.S., since 1947. Israel does the whacking. Its wrong now and was wrong to displace 700+ thousand people from their homes and livelihoods. Israel controls 80 to 90% of arable land and water. They've essentially imprisoned Palestinians in squalid encampments and demanded they accept their fate because they are not "the chosen people." If Native Americans in this country developed super weapon and threatened to use it if they did not get THEIR country back, what do think the reaction of American citizens would be? I harbor no animosity towards most Isralei citizens. It's not their fault they were born where they were. But their government has been disingenous at best and criminal at worst in their treatment of their "captives." In point of fact, the country we now call Israel should NEVER have been implemented at gunpoint back in '47. Many succesive generations of Palestinians had lived on that land before being imprisoned and then forced to watch their homes being bulldozed. It makes no difference if Palestinians are "Semites" or not. Israel is wrong, has taken even more land than oiginal deal called for, and should not be getting continued U.S. aid until they honor Palestinians with a deal that divides territory in much more equitable fashion. As for Beck...bye fool.
 
 
+9 # des 2011-04-11 16:42
After WW2 the holocaust survivors were NOT welcomed with open arms by the Allies, nor welcome in their devastated former homelands, where neighbours had turned a blind eye to their arrest, and in many cases seized their property .... SO the Allies sought a solution ... Africa?, South America? ... LO ... Israel! .. that would sell ... and wealthy Jews would underwrite it ... It created a problem for the UK, but it wasn't in a position to reverse its Balfour deal ... the native Palestinians? Who's asking? Who's worrying?
And a BIG military base was needed in the Middle East ....
 
 
+9 # AndreM5 2011-04-12 07:10
You got me completely wrong. I support the Palestinians in this and I have visited there recently. I made one single point that "Semite" does not refer only to Israeli Jews. OK?
 
 
+7 # genierae 2011-04-11 08:51
It wasn't a theory, AndreM5, it was an honest question. Is legitimate criticism of Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories anti-Semitic? I do know that Palestinians are also Semites, but I don't see that its relevant to my comment.
 
 
+3 # AndreM5 2011-04-12 07:11
How can being in support of Palestinians, who are Semite, make you anti-Semite?
 
 
+1 # serz4u 2011-04-12 09:06
This is semantics. In practice, Antisemitism refers to anti-Jewish bigotry. Discrimination against Palestinians and Arabs is certainly widespread, but we're going to have to find an alternative term.
 
 
-3 # rm 2011-04-12 17:17
Who cares about anti-semitism anymore. It is not the issue. Israel's policies of GENOCIDE against the Palestinians is the issue and the reason no one in the USG or the mainstream media like Dana Millbank will mention it is because of the Israeli lobby in the US or more properly the Zionist lobby. Who cares about the Protocols of Zion. I've never read it and don't care to, but I know what the Israeli lobby has done to the USG and the USG is the main proponent of the "new world order." Why bring up these stinking red herrings like anti-semitism or the Protocols -- unless you are a well-paid member of the MSM and are paid to load in these distractions so we don't focus on Israeli slow motion genocide.
 
 
+68 # Liberal_Lady 2011-04-10 22:26
This news that Beck is going away, has "made my week"! It's just too bad it was so long in coming about! We'll never know, but I will always wonder if he hadn't been on TV nightly, spewing his venom, the shootings in AZ. in January may never have occurred! And Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, and the other victims might alive and well, and be fine today! That wild-eyed assassin, Jared Loughner, might not have gotten worked up to such a pitch that he decided to go on his 'killing spree'! Between Beck's poison tongue, and stupid fear mongering rants, Sarah Palin's vitriolic hatred and smear campaign she's been on for almost 3 years now, and of course, the "daddy of 'em all"...Rush Limbaugh and his sarcastic pot-boiling up of anti-everything, almost daily for years now...all of it has been just too much for too long! It's no wonder our country is in such a violent, suspicious mood that just keeps festering on and on, with not much let-up! I often wonder where we (and the rest of the world would be) if we heard more talk of peace and good will towards everyone and praise for our elected officials (especially the President) on a daily basis?! I could go on, but this is too long now! I'll just end by saying; "Goodbye, Beck, and I wish we had NEVER known ye"!
 
 
+74 # CHFels 2011-04-10 22:42
I hope Dana Milbank is right in thinking that Fox dropped Beck because he finally got too crazy even for them. The truth is probably less flattering: they dropped Beck because advertisers were dropping Beck by the dozens; and the advertisers dropped Beck, by and large, because of grassroots campaigns and petitions. I've seen as yet no evidence that Fox's bosses possess a minimal conscience, so I suspect that it's not that Beck got too odious in his messages for them; the odious message just stopped selling soap.

I also doubt the analysis of the first three lines of the article. The shaky economic recovery has not buoyed consumer confidence (much less the prospects of real working-class people) enough to put fear-mongers out of business. The fear and despair are still there, and Fox will continue to exploit it.
 
 
+29 # Intuitone 2011-04-11 06:02
I completely agree with this...Beck stopped selling the soap...Perfect!
 
 
+24 # AndreM5 2011-04-11 07:07
I don't understand the Millbank conclusion either. Not at all. Beck was unhinged from the beginning but his fiction and rants brought viewers. When the viewers left so did Beck. Even Millbank acknowledges this, so on what grounds does Faux get any credit?
 
 
+15 # banichi 2011-04-11 00:53
So glad he's gone (for a while at least!)

Does anyone remember the guy who was taken over by a super cockroach in "Men In Black"? Glenn Beck's pictures are startlingly like his.....
 
 
+33 # hms 2011-04-11 00:55
I believe the tactic of the Republicans and especially the radical right of their kind, in fine rovian style, simply want a whole lot of chickens in the barnyard to peck away at the feet, toes and ankles of anyone who opposes and disagrees with their goals. Thus it's "death by a hundred hen pecks" as a tactic to contribute to the disorder in the Democrats' world. This scheming is directed from all quarters and should always be viewed on the basis of it's overall scale (and, of course, overall effect), not by it's individual elements. In the Carl Rove world, it's simply good aggressive politicking! Oh, and for sure ethics be damned!
 
 
+2 # Deep Blue 2011-04-11 00:58
The question was posed and answered in the fourth paragraph.
 
 
+35 # Heartbeatt 2011-04-11 01:04
I agree with muskokajpm.
Why have Beck in the first place? It was absolutely inexcusable and has caused untold damage to the USA, both within the country and outside the country - just imagine what the citizens of foreign countries think when they see that the US has TV stations that allows this kind of lying and defamation. More like Goebbels than news and opinion.
I don't even give Fox credit for letting Beck go. It was self-serving and they don't deserve any praise at all.
 
 
+35 # Frosty46 2011-04-11 02:06
Do not make the mistake of thinking the Fox Syndicate has reformed in any way.
They, as in lock, stock and barrel, are traitors to truth and traitors to America!
 
 
+15 # Gary Pierson 2011-04-11 02:48
I leave a Beck in my toilet every day.. And it stinks the same as he.. Bye jerkoff! grp
 
 
+22 # RSJ 2011-04-11 03:22
I think Milbank is off-base here. Beck's 'innovation' was to bring the schlock of the world of rock DJ shock jocks to the political arena. (Beck was once an uncaged member of some radio embarrassment called 'The Morning Zoo.')

Much of Beck's audience, I'm convinced, weren't there for the politics; like a Jerry Springer crowd, they were there for the outrage and craziness and. most of all, for the full-blown on-air psychotic meltdown. For a while, Beck kept upping the 'weird' ante, but he eventually reached the point where he had to top himself to hang onto the drive-by gadflies. That basically meant he either had to shoot himself or someone else live on the air, or come out and advocate armed rebellion against Obama's government in plain terms, and appoint himself to lead the troops, to boot. Since any of those choices would have sent Beck to jail, he instead hid behind goofy conspiracy theories and his poor-pupil's blackboard. He just, in the words of the fictional Howard Beale, ran out of bullsh*t, and bullsh*t was all he had to sell. In five years the media will be asking 'whatever happened to Glenn Beck?' and the public won't have the faintest idea.
 
 
+3 # csteiner 2011-04-12 09:03
absolutely! no credit to fox, beck just ran out of bullsh*t and could not sell any more soap.
 
 
+32 # stonecutter 2011-04-11 03:37
It's vitally important to distinguish between the "partisan journalism" that is practiced by the few putatively conservative news reporters at FOX, and the inflammatory right-wing "punditry" spewed by the likes of Hannity and O'Reilly and Kelly and the FOX morning show crew, that is actually a steady stream of skewed, corrosive, often fact-challenged propaganda.

Milbank may see some journalistic merit in FOX finally dumping the obvious racist demogogue Beck, but frankly, he's trying to put lipstick on a pig. FOX tossed this nutjob because he lost 300 sponsors along the way, leaving him with a bunch of low-revenue bottom-feeding advertisers and geezer demographics, both results the tried and true recipe for cancellation in the TV biz. To suggest FOX had an attack of moral conscience due to Beck's flaming anti-semitism and Hitler fetish is the height of disingenuousnes s on Milbank's part. Perhaps so because the Wash Post, like the NY Times, is trying hard in the shrinking print market to emulate the winning neocon formula Old Rupert has introduced at the newly unrecognizable but profitable Wall St. Journal he now calls his flagship paper.

Bedbugs make strange bedfellows, but at least Beck will be off the air...thank Nielsen for small favors. Good riddance to putrid garbage.
 
 
0 # dmh 2011-04-11 08:43
Good comments, stonecutter, but I'll add a tiny proviso re. Milbank. (By the way, disingenuousnes s is lying, right? Have I got that right? Why do we love that euphemism?) I don't think of this guy as a liar. But I do take note of his book on Beck. I have not read it and will keep that habit up. But it's probably worked out along some ideo- or socio- logical line and it's being advertised here. I think he probably believes in anything he has said in the essay. That makes his comments in the essay complementary with his theses (that's complementary with an e). He's worked himself up to a theoretical view of Beck that comports with this crap about a reborn Faux News. It's hard when your mind is in the higher realms of a cultural critique to remember that the creatures who run Faux News are there for two things only: right wing slime and the cash it brings in. Hard to admit that the Beck cash cow simply dropped dead for the advertisers. Thanks for the insight and the tone. dmh
 
 
+31 # LiberalLibertarian 2011-04-11 04:39
Maybe the momentum is starting to shift. On the same day Beck was fired, Boston's top paid radio talk show guy; rabid Right Winger, Jay Severin, was also fired.
In both cases the root cause was shrinking audiences leading to lower revenues.

Now, if only the Dems could see the obvious instead playing against the last election.
 
 
+19 # Homer Peters 2011-04-11 04:44
I only wish Keith Olbermann was still on the air to roll Beck in a little Shake n Bake and pop him in the oven!
 
 
+24 # nelnan 2011-04-11 04:54
This is the best news I've had in a long time. The streak of insanity that Glenn Beck represents is frightening. My question is, why have so many people followed him?
 
 
+22 # Chip Berlet 2011-04-11 05:03
It is really important to understand the role of spreading "apocalyptic forecasts and ominous conspiracies" in fomenting bigotry. Milibank nails this with the comparision to Coughlin. Beck may be going, but conspiracy theories about Jews, Muslims, Mexicans, and leftist organizers continue to circulate daily on AM talk radio across the country. There are millions of our fellow citizens who still are enmeshed in this dangerous worldview.
 
 
+11 # consuelo 2011-04-11 05:08
pretty much the answer to any questions these days is: the bottom line.
 
 
+17 # fhunter 2011-04-11 05:29
The very first time I have seen Beck, my first reaction was: this guy is deranged. Unfortunately, it took much longer for Fox to reach the same conclusion, and he had plenty of time to do a lot of damage.
 
 
+20 # Walter Fivd 2011-04-11 05:33
There's nothing too "unhinged" for Fox Pseudo-News Network-- Rupert Murdoch is worse than William Randloph Hearst. Unfortunately, Headline News and CNN are little better.
 
 
-21 # in deo veritas 2011-04-11 05:33
If it is a false accusation, then why did Soros confess to collaboration on the Larry King program? Religion has nothing to do with that as Beck doesn't like anyone. Soros funds the Dems, Koches fund the Repugs, we are the losers.
 
 
+28 # in deo veritas 2011-04-11 05:35
Now it's Rust Limbueger's turn to go! The sooner the better!
 
 
+22 # in deo veritas 2011-04-11 05:42
Beck is just a symptom of how sick a society we are living in. The cure is to go after the puppeteers pulling the strings not only of his ilk but those in government as well. Otherwise his exit is welcome but irrelevant. Attacking religion, regardless of who does it and who is attacked is also pointless and counterproducti ve. Greed is common to all and there is the issue: it is antithetical to all religions.
 
 
+2 # thunder4ever 2011-04-12 08:19
Fox & Co. simply used and encouraged Beck to spread his poison often in a cartoon like and deranged manner to attack anything that they disagreed with. As bad as this was, what's even scarier is the crazies who actually believed and reveled in his lunatic and dangerous antics and sometimes acted on his bizarre ideas. Good riddance to bad rubbish.
 
 
+11 # Linda 2011-04-11 05:58
He's not leaving entirely . Fox is still keeping him on the payroll as a reward for his job well done.
He did their dirty work selling his soul for a few pieces of silver stiring up the Tea Party crazies with this crazy nonesense . Now that the crazies sit in Congress to complete the demise of our democracy by handing over the keys to our government to the money changers, his crazy theories and fear tactics served the purpose it was intended to do and aren't needed any more .
 
 
+16 # minmouse 2011-04-11 06:11
Fox doesn't deserve any credit for getting rid of Beck, the sponsors did the job, sponsors were leaving the show like flies. Fox will have another nut case in Beck's place before you know it.
 
 
+7 # GeorgeNJ 2011-04-11 06:13
bcmarshall, up above, understands what is going on. Beck assails other races. Nothing. Beck assails Jews. All hell breaks loose.
 
 
+9 # coach777b 2011-04-11 06:59
I don't believe our President is Jewish, yet Beck spent as much time hating on him as he did on Soros. Beck is an equal opportunity hater. Anyone not like him or or LimBalls is a target. Fox deserves no credit. It's like I let my pit bull rage thru the neighborhood for years snarling, biting and creating havoc. Now that he has the Latino, Black and Jewish neighbors scared, I agree publicly to keep him in our kennel.
 
 
+8 # Roo 2011-04-11 07:12
He was fired for lowered ratings- no more, no less.
George Soros a Nazi sympathizer? He was born 1930, do the math.
 
 
+10 # cycleman60 2011-04-11 07:32
For Fox to use Beck for dishing out all the BS about racial, Obama and you got it, places Fox at the helm of idocy. Why anyone would spend 10 seconds listening to that air wave is to question their sanity. Beck is just an ex alcoholic, drug abuser and plain loser. He sold his mush mouth ideas to executives no smarter than he is.
 
 
+9 # mwd4Hope 2011-04-11 07:47
"Too unhinged even for Fox"? doubtful; he'll probably be replaced by another bigoted fear and hate monger. Dropped more likely due to sponsors pulling away after public pressure on them to do so. Sickening that he was given a podium so long; encouraging that people power helped force change Fox otherwise wouldn't have made.
 
 
+9 # alice indigo 2011-04-11 08:03
Fox and the sponsors that left deserve no credit - they should not have supported Beck from the beginning. My concern is our education system. We somehow have produced folks who have not been trained to seek the facts. We should be strengthening our education system - not cutting resources and basing teachers' pay on tests dreamed up by folks and endorsed by elected officials who have no idea what they are doing.
 
 
+9 # todd williams 2011-04-11 08:20
Dear HMS, your analogy to chickens offends me! I have 20 hens and they are gentle, loving creatures. To compare a hen to Beck and company hurts my feelings. As a matter of fact, my hens are a lot smarter than Beck, El Rusho and the others. In fact, during the election, my hens cried out "braaaaaackobama ." Please apologize!
 
 
+9 # frank67 2011-04-11 08:36
Beck is just a symtom of the FOX disease!
 
 
+7 # unclearte 2011-04-11 08:43
What Mr. Beck was ranting was dangerous enough, but the hatred and separation of the American people was his true goal and
his tragic legacy...We as a people united,
have much to do. The fighting and ignorance
stand in Our collective best interest..
 
 
+5 # charsjcca 2011-04-11 12:31
Americans need to have respect for one another. That is, in my view, the missing link.
 
 
+2 # thunder4ever 2011-04-12 08:27
Unclearte: I totally agree. Much of the damage has been done. He may very well have accomplished his goal. It behooves the democrats to keep putting out the truth and making sure that it reaches the uninformed, misinformed, and brainwashed kool-aid drinking masses who are dragging our country backward and downward.
 
 
-1 # tahoevalleylines 2011-04-11 09:15
Storing food was attributable to the Mormon upbringing.

Comments about the Palestinians in the popular dialogue are on false premise the "Palestinians" are original inhabitants when the record of Israeli land legacy goes back to B.C. And, Israeli plurality in Palestine until Muslims murdered their way in, circa 700 AD. -Begs the question of "where's the oilpatch money" when it comes to helping the Muslim Bros ...

Gold buying and hoarding strays from even the Mormons, who cannot get James Chapter 5 out of the way. Maybe the Baptists can help Glenn on the futility of putting faith in Gold & Silver. Thieves kill for precious metal, and governments call up the metals when the bond ratings dip ...

Beck would achieve good purpose by dialing in on the oil depletion phenomenon, and study Richard Heinberg; have Rep Roscoe Bartlett (R-MD)on the show for a detailed conversation on Peaking Oil.

It would be a test of resiliency, a true "Come-Back-Kid" rebirth to hear Glenn Beck and one or more Republican hopefuls present their case for a rehab of the American railway freight & passenger network so methodically dismantled on the premise of cheap imported motor fuel...

If Richard Heinberg declines try reading "ELECTRIC WATER" (New Society Press 2007) for EIOER primer. With some authority, try Heinberg again!
 
 
+3 # tcatt57 2011-04-11 12:08
It is good news Glen Barks never ending audition for the lead role of, "Charlie" with the Manson Family of Media, the Pure Propaganda Network provides that percentage of population susceptible to their hypnotic techniques. The bigger problem is that the family is intact and that a perfectly capable Fat Fascist in Florida is ready to fill the role of Charlie. The even larger problem are the other so-called mainstream media, where the mere mention of any derogatory judgment of Israel or an Israeli is automatic banishment to anti-Semite land. What little media that remained prior to Bush, vanished after the 9/11 coupe, the other topic with automatic banishment to the land of Conspiracy Theory. If Americans continue to let this media dictate those few thousand voices of Tea party billionaires and suppress the 95% citizens who want Justice over these idiots and greedy political parties who have traded Justice for Just Us, this country is doomed. We can still save this country, but must return to that horrible day and face our demons, apply real justice to the guilty parties and their main enable, mainstream media. Senator Gravel has an interesting proposal for The National Initiative for Democracy for a way citizens could intervene; http://ni4d.us/en/national_initiative. Dear God, America, seek Justice for All, once again!
 
 
+4 # toonthenews 2011-04-11 12:15
As happy as many are to see Glenn Beck go, most humorist are also disappointed as they will have to find another wingnut for a source of political humor. To be sure though we have not heard the last of Glenn Beck. In looking for an appropriate way to send him off and going through audio from a few of his shows it became apparent that Glenn Beck has been singing his own version of the Beatle Revolution all along!
So for you viewing pleasure...
A must see!
Glenn Beck Beatles Revolution Parody
The Revolting Glenn Beck! His Farewell Song!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Or1aukq5DJI
 
 
+5 # charsjcca 2011-04-11 12:30
The issues facing America were boiling long before Glenn Beck was born and if we do not have the will to go to work on them they will be around after Glenn Beck has been called home. It never was about Glenn Beck.
 
 
+2 # Mary Lou Morrison 2011-04-11 17:31
I have never watched Fox...but once in a great while I would catch a tiny bit of glenn beck and actually thought he had a "hate screw" loose. Thank goodness Fox wised up. Enough hate is enough!!!! TJ
 
 
+3 # vexac 2011-04-12 06:55
He can probably get a radio job in St.George, Utah
 
 
+1 # Ellyn 2011-04-12 23:13
Oh, please. If Glenn Beck hadn't lost all his advertisers thanks to "Color of Change", et al., he wouldn't be exiting. And what Hannity and O'lielly do is not "journalism".
 
 
0 # JayMagoo 2011-04-15 09:37
Becks sin was that he lost money. Not that he was crazy, which he admittedly is, nor that he offended intelligent, sensible people, which he did, but that he lost it. He will be replaced by someone else who is just as untruthful, and irresponsible and anti-intellectual and anti-democratic as he is. As long as Roger Ailes, who was "tricky-dick" Nixon's campaign strategist is in charge of news at the Fox Network, they will continue to seek people like Back, O'Reilly, Hannity, et all who lie as part of their contract and nature and whose sole purpose is to destroy Democrats, to slander Obama, and to promote the welfare of Billionaires like the Koch brothers who founded and pay for the Tea Party movement. There will be another Beck, I'd bet they're out looking for abitger Becj now.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.