Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Robert Kuttner writes: "Let us face the momentous truth: The United States has been rendered ungovernable except on the extortionate terms of the far-right. For the first time in modern history, one of the two major parties is in the hands of a faction so extreme that it is willing to destroy the economy if it doesn't get its way."

Speaker of the House John Boehner speaks to a television crew at the Capitol, 07/25/11. (photo: Nicolas Kamm/Getty Images)
Speaker of the House John Boehner speaks to a television crew at the Capitol, 07/25/11. (photo: Nicolas Kamm/Getty Images)



The Goons of August

By Robert Kuttner, The American Prospect

02 July 11

 

et us face the momentous truth: The United States has been rendered ungovernable except on the extortionate terms of the far-right.

For the first time in modern history, one of the two major parties is in the hands of a faction so extreme that it is willing to destroy the economy if it doesn't get its way.

And the Tea Party Republicans have a perfect foil in President Barack Obama. The budget deal is the logical conclusion of Obama's premise that the way to make governing partners of the far right is to keep appeasing them. He is the perfect punching bag. He can be blasted both as a far-left liberal and as a weakling.

We did not have to reach this pass. At any of several points in the past two years, a Democratic president could have called out the Republicans on the sheer perversity of the policies they are demanding. Most voters do not want cuts in Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid. The Paul Ryan "Roadmap for America's Future" alone, in the hands of a politically competent Democratic president, should have been enough to destroy Republican credibility.

If you want to see what an eloquent, and politically persuasive Democratic leader looks like, listen to Nancy Pelosi's floor speech from Saturday.

Had Obama spoken with this clarity, the Republican program and politics could have been exposed and quarantined.

But this week it was Pelosi who was isolated by the game the White House was playing. Tactically, House Democrats were opposing the Boehner bill and supporting Sen. Harry Reid's plan to get a debt extension without sacrificing Medicare, Medicaid, or Social Security. But as the weekend wore on, the Reid Plan came to look more and more like the Boehner plan.

Democrats, from Obama on down, never should have accepted the premise that economic policy in 2011 was about deficit reduction. Once that became the game, Republicans were able to play chicken with the national debt.

For the most part, the mainstream media - with the exception of much of the New York Times coverage and its intelligent editorials - have been in the role of enablers, treating the debt ceiling as if it were the main story. Assuming the deal is finalized, the headlines and talking-head commentary will trumpet the narrow avoidance of a default, missing the point entirely.

The politics of default were always an artificial creation by Republicans. The real story is that Republicans played President Obama like a violin; and that the deal is terrible economics.

Economically, the budget deal will further weaken a fragile economy. Politically, the deal is a time bomb. It locks in a path to deeper cuts in programs that Democrats should be defending. Under the deal, the same scenario of default versus massive budget cutting that worked so well for the Republicans this time will be repeated next year.

The United States is now reminiscent of countries that at various periods of their history have been either been paralyzed by minority extremist groups; or worse, have elected them to office.

The rise of the Tea Party right is a classic case of how a small, extremist faction seizes control when the political mainstream fails to solve deep national problems. It is an amalgam of a far-right that has always hovered around one-fifth of the electorate, swollen by the frustrations of previously apolitical people.

In much of Europe today, far-right populist parties now typically get 20 or 25 percent of the vote. With Europe's parliamentary and multiparty system, however, they don't get to govern, but in several countries they are now the second of third most popular party.

These parties represent about the same share of public opinion as the Tea Party in the US. But in America, with our two-party system and our constitutional machinery of blockage, if a determined minority gains control of one party it can bring responsible government to a halt. That is what has now occurred, and it will color our politics between now and the 2012 election, and quite possibly beyond.

As political scientist Andrew Hacker points out in an important piece in the current New York Review of Books, current House Republicans received a total of 30,799,391 votes in the 2010 midterm election. Barack Obama received more than twice that many, 69,498,215, in the 2008 presidential.

The falloff between 2008 and 2010 was only slightly worse than usual. However in 2010 the people who turned out most intensely were Obama's rightwing opposition. Many of the young and working class voters who came out to cast ballots for Obama in 2008 didn't see any reason to vote in the 2010 mid-term. So Republicans are behaving as if they have a radical mandate that far outstrips the actual support for their tactics and policies - and Obama is failing to contest them.

How do you invite the radical right to take power? Start with thirty years of stagnant of declining living standards for most people. Then add a financial crisis made on Wall Street. Next, elect a Democratic president who raises hopes, but who turns out to be a close ally of the same forces that caused the collapse. Give that president a temperament that refuses to blame the right, and is mainly about seeking accommodation. The right then gets to put Washington and Wall Street in the same bucket, and blame the Democrats.

So you end up with a weak center unable to deliver recovery or reform, an angry, passionate right, and an enfeebled left reluctant to challenge their president until it is too late.

It is a fearsome time in the history of our Republic. And the politics of extortion by the Tea Party Republicans will not end with this deal. On the contrary, the deal will encourage more of the same.

What are the choices now for progressives?

Progressives in the House should vote to kill this deal. They were sold out by the White House. The President might then be forced to invoke the 14th Amendment, which he should have done along.

Progressives need to build a mass movement of their own. The pocketbook frustrations that animated the Tea Party will not be remedied by the Republican program. There needs to be a left alternative. And the Democratic Party base needs to make it clear that Obama cannot take their support for granted, and that deals such as this one will lead activists to work to elect House and Senate progressives.

Until this happens, the Republican right, with a majority of seats in one legislative house and speaking for the views of a small minority, will continue to rule.


Robert Kuttner is co-editor of The American Prospect and a Senior Fellow at Demos. His latest book is "A Presidency in Peril."

 

Comments  

 
+18 # Larry Jost 2011-08-02 08:32
Robert Kuttner has been on the mark all along during this terrible exercise of concession after concession being made by President Obama. Now we have locked ourselves into an impossible situation in which "Republicrites" will call all the shots by asking the T-Party "know-nothings" what to do next. It is a great pity that the President has failed so badly in not even trying to become the "transformtive" executive he might have become that Mr. Kuttner called for in his 2008 book. Of course we on the left will have little choice but to try to "have his back" next year while he sold out this year! LJ
 
 
+21 # mitchell donian 2011-08-02 09:28
Quoting
Robert Kuttner has been on the mark all along during this terrible exercise of concession after concession being made by President Obama. Now we have locked ourselves into an impossible situation in which "Republicrites" will call all the shots by asking the T-Party "know-nothings" what to do next. It is a great pity that the President has failed so badly in not even trying to become the "transformtive" executive he might have become that Mr. Kuttner called for in his 2008 book. Of course we on the left will have little choice but to try to "have his back" next year while he sold out this year! LJ

OUR OTHER CHOICE IS TO CHALLENGE OBAMA IN A PRIMARY WITH A TICKET INCLUDING RUSS FEINGOLD, ELIZABETH WARREN, HOWARD DEAN, DENNIS KUCCINICH, DICK DURBIN...LET'S GET IT ROLIING!
 
 
+6 # Texas Aggie 2011-08-02 10:23
I would add Nancy Pelosi to that list.
 
 
+7 # phrixus 2011-08-02 10:58
Great idea, seriously. Just one caveat: Whom do I contact about that notion? Who's in charge of driving the machinery that sets those wheels spinning? It sure as hell isn't the Democratic Party. They're as spineless as our current Placater-in-Chief. Whom do I call to draft Feingold, Sanders, Warren, Dean or Kucinich?
 
 
+3 # Gary E. 2011-08-02 11:58
phrixus: Do you live in a caucus state or a primary state? If you live in a caucus state you and your friends should attend your neighborhood caucus meeting and vote for a candidate you like best. If you live in a primary state vote for the candidate you like best. If in either case there is no candidate that you like, go ahead and write in the name of a person you would like for president of the United States.
 
 
+4 # heraldmage 2011-08-02 14:44
Our only choice is to unite all the Progressive leaning independent parties for use by "We the People" to replace both corrupt parties. They have to much to gain in the current system & campaign contribution. They will never change for the good of the people.
If Dems want to join "We the People" and sign the platform indicating they will enact the peoples platform including public funding of political campaigns with absolutely no private funds allowed,reinsta te Fairness Doctrine & free news by requiring it broadcast as public service than that's great.
 
 
+1 # Kurt 2011-08-03 05:24
But how do we begin - how do we get someone else on the ballot - someone who is on our side, and who is willing to spend and risk to fight both the republicans and obama?
 
 
+1 # ER444 2011-08-03 13:01
AMEN.I am am onboard and willing to make a donation. Get Alan Grayson to join the camp!!!
 
 
0 # ER444 2011-08-03 13:06
Oh yeah, let's not forget Bernie Sanders!!!
 
 
+3 # Texan 4 Peace 2011-08-02 11:02
How do your good points lead to this conclusion?
Quoting
Of course we on the left will have little choice but to try to "have his back" next year while he sold out this year! LJ

Why should we "have his back" when he doesn't have ours? If an actual Republican (instead of a stealth one) takes the presidency, at least the grassroots left will be on its toes. IMO, the WORSE situation is a DINO president who passes Republican policies while the left gives him a pass. Think where we'd be today if McCain had been elected -- probably better than we are now, because the Democratic base and Congress would have marshaled an actual opposition!
 
 
+29 # Stanley Hall 2011-08-02 09:50
As a Texan, I'm used to right wing politicians using government to enrich and protect their wealthy bosses---millionaires, billionaires and large corporations---but I'm at a new low now that it's clear to me Obama does not share my liberalism. Republicans call him a socialist or a Marxist. He is, in fact. more of a moderate conservative. When he endorsed the most favorable estate tax change in our history last December, I knew he will not be the change we voted for. He needs to listen to Sen. Bernie Sanders verbally defend the interests of the average person. Maybe get a clue.
 
 
+11 # Texas Aggie 2011-08-02 10:25
Molly, where are you when we need you???!!!
 
 
+2 # jon 2011-08-02 15:16
Quoting
Molly, where are you when we need you???!!!


Just imagine what Molly Ivins would be saying right now !?!? Jim Hightower - my other favorite Texan - where are you?
 
 
+12 # angelfish 2011-08-02 10:30
I'd like to know WHY the Justice Department isn't looking into the reasons WHY these FOOLS would put us in such dire straits and if there isn't some nefarious reason WHY they've ALL been in such a Sweat to bring our Nation to it's collective knees on the whim of a few Freshmen Newbies in the House whose heads are so far up their Alimentary Canals that they may NEVER see daylight again! WHERE is Justice? HOW can this kind of behavior in a FREE Society be allowed to stand? They are NOT Imperial, no matter what they THINK, they are still in Congress at the PUBLIC'S invitation. They can ALL be Impeached for their concerted efforts to Over-Throw our Country and bring down the duly elected Administration of Barak Obama! They are NOT Republicans or even ReTHUGlicans, they are the K.N.F.P., the Koch/Norquist Fascist Party, and need to be reined in before they WRECK our entire Political System! Learn about them, prepare yourselves intellectually to fight them at the Polls. Be prepared for their concerted effort to make us a Third World Gulag!
 
 
-5 # Gary E. 2011-08-02 12:05
angelfish: It sounds to me like you never graduated from high school because your remarks show no understanding of how our system is supposed to work. The Justice Department cannot meddle in the politics of duly elected congressmen and, furthermore, congressmen cannot be impeached. Your ignorance is unbecoming!
 
 
+6 # angelfish 2011-08-02 19:34
Even when their behaviors are damaging us? I thought that NO man was above the Law, be he President, Congressman or Senator. I thought that our elected Officials were held to the same Laws as those they serve. Surely the Justice Department can "meddle" if one or some of these Fascists are breaking Laws to get their Agendas passed? I know "dirty tricks" have been a part of Washington Politics for ages, but when they are caught with their hands in the Cookie Jar, ala Watergate, they should be made to pay as was Nixon and his Cabal of conservative henchmen. As for my ignorance, forgive me, but you have no need to be condescending or nasty. Your superiority is is as unbecoming as my ignorance!
 
 
-22 # Hot Doggie 2011-08-02 10:36
This is a double-speak article. It appears that Robert Kuttner is attempting to downgrade the Tea Party. Everyone knows that the GOP invaded the Tea Party: not the other way around. There is a movement starting whereby the Tea Party is being slandered. Keep in mind that the Tea Party was started to bring honesty into politics. Although it is not succeeding, it remains an endeavor of it.

The real culprit is a tyranical alleged defacto president and a tyranical congress. This committee of 13 is unconstitutiona l and tyranical. But the double-speak people want to divert the people's attention to the supposed wrongs fo the Tea Party instead of the actual wrongs of the tyranicals.
 
 
+8 # Gary E. 2011-08-02 13:14
Hot Doggie: I think you're mistaken to say the GOP invaded the Tea Party. If the Tea Party had set itself up as an independent party then they would have had considerable difficulty getting their candidates on the ballots of many states and – like all previous third parties – would have elected probably nobody. What the Tea Party did was act like a parasite of the GOP. That is to say they acted like a biological organism that lives inside another organism from which it obtains benefits like – in this case – getting easy access to the ballot. Progressive Democrats might consider acting inside the Democratic Party in a like manner in order to get that coveted access to the primary ballot.
 
 
+13 # phrixus 2011-08-02 10:46
Obama just gave away the ranch. It's obvious there's no depth he will not descend to in order to appease his corporate handlers and the other monied interests he's so obviously in bed with. Compared to our current President, Neville Chamberlain was a man of backbone, courage and conviction. That such a despicable fraud currently occupies the White House is a stain on democracy.
 
 
+7 # tomo 2011-08-02 10:52
Kuttner's analysis is very accurate and clear. While agreeing with him, I have a strange take on our current paralysis. People of my ilk have long complained of "Imperial America." There has been, in fact, the making of an "American Century" at least from the entry of America into the Second World War up to the present moment. Our immense economic and military power has often had very adverse effects on Latin America and Asia--including the Middle East. Many of us have wondered what might curtail that power to render it less of a threat to the emergence of human rights and justice abroad, and to a sustainable lifestyle throughout the world.

An adage from pagan times says: "Whom the gods would destroy they first make mad." America seems ready--for almost inscrutable reasons--to take itself out; we seem to have entered a track of slow-motion self-mutilation. It is almost inexplicable, but there it is. The silver lining here is that perhaps the rest of the world will breathe easier (and the planet itself will suffer less) once we have reduced ourselves to a second-rate power.
 
 
+14 # SteveM 2011-08-02 11:40
The late, great Sen. Edward M. Kennedy probably began rolling over in his grave when President Obama did the first of his great above-ground tea-sipper rollovers late last year. Now, Teddy may very well be doing back-over flips after what transpired yesterday!

Given how he ardently and tirelessly he defended the needs of those among us who have the least, I seriously doubt that Ted Kennedy would be in favor of what the man he supported in '08, Barack Obama, has said and done re: this latest capitulation, all for the sake of compromising with those who feel no need to compromise with him.
I also doubt that Ted Kennedy, if he was still alive, would today support a 2012 Barack Obama presidential run.

I've said it before and I'll say it again: please don't run in 2012, President Barack Obama. It is all-too-apparent that you don't have the backbone or the intestinal fortitude for the tasks at hand, and both your friends and your enemies know it.
 
 
+6 # tomo 2011-08-02 12:34
Steve: I'm with you. Just as Obama has been unwilling to confront the oligarchy of rich people who run America today, so the rank-and-file of Democrats have been unwilling to confront Obama. And so we blame him for capitulating, and then turn around and capitulate to him. We need not do so. The case of LBJ is instructive.

LBJ was elected on a laudable project of ending poverty in America. He betrayed that project by whoring after the role of warrior in Vietnam. When he was challenged by Eugene McCarthy in New Hampshire, LBJ retired from the scene.

Let's hope we can do something like that in the primary process that is coming soon. And let's hope, this time, we can somehow restrain the corporatocracy from murdering the person we attempt to put in Obama's place.
 
 
0 # jeang287 2011-08-02 13:11
IMO it's sad that all President O's fair-weather friends have turned on him because he has not single-handedly slain the Repuglosaurus. I wish any of these wise folk could have traded places with President O, to show how _they_ would have handled a rabid Republican party whose leaders admitted two years ago that their main goal was to "make Obama fail." And then there is his own party, for the most part "summer soldiers and sunshine patriots" who have anything but his back.
Okay, maybe he wasn't perfect. Who is?
Go ahead, tear into me. I don't care -- I still think President O is a great man and a great president.
You don't have to agree.
 
 
+5 # MainStreetMentor 2011-08-02 14:55
These issues are all of import ... but not now. What's important now is: American Jobs. That needs to be followed by a complete, legal, gutting of Wall Street and the dissolution of the Federal banking system. President Andrew Jackson did it - and, it worked. But first we gott'a have jobs, people. Jobs!
 
 
+3 # nmceachron 2011-08-02 17:47
If first we must have jobs, then the right-wing counteraction to what's being suggested here is all too obvious--continue the policy of austerity and poverty already begun under this obscene capitulation. So that's exactly what will happen--no change. There must be another way. What is the other way besides bullets and bombs?
 
 
+5 # BLBreck 2011-08-02 17:53
My 2 cents. I feel it is more important to get rid of the new TP Republicans that were voted into office as Reps and Senators and Governors during the progressive sloth in 2010 by getting out there and not only voting in 2012, but organizing to get good candidates on the ballot, get voters registered and to the polls. If the House was not so stacked with ideologues this wouldn't have happened. It's them we definitely need to get out of politics! Not that it wouldn't be nice to have a strong liberal in the White House, but that could end in disaster by splitting the vote so a Republican like, eek!, Perry gets there AND we have his minions still in the House and Senate! Then I shudder to think!
 
 
+5 # mmeppie 2011-08-02 18:58
The Democrats have set themselves and the country up for disaster. The Republicans now have proof that blackmail works, and the ink has not yet dried on Obama's signature when the next shoe is already falling: the Republicans are refusing to extending funding for the FAA to force Democrats to give up union rights for the employees. Nothing is safe anymore. The social safety net will be systematically shredded because the Democrats blinked. Just watch! It will be one thing after another, downhill all the way for the people and for the country.
 
 
+4 # ericlipps 2011-08-03 05:37
Quoting
angelfish: It sounds to me like you never graduated from high school because your remarks show no understanding of how our system is supposed to work. The Justice Department cannot meddle in the politics of duly elected congressmen and, furthermore, congressmen cannot be impeached. Your ignorance is unbecoming!


Ahem. It may be yours which is showing. As far back as 1797, Tennessee Sen. Richard Blounbt was impeached (source: The Infoplease Perpetual Calendar entry for Aug. 2).
 
 
0 # MidwestTom 2011-08-04 06:50
This is far from the first time, the vast majority of Americans were opposed to entering WW I, and it took our government over a year to finally enter, and the dirty dealing that resulted in that entry is well documented.
 
 
0 # Hugh A 2011-08-07 06:31
Why wasn't Pelosi's speech pushed everywhere? Dem's should have bought time on TV all over the country. I bet not 1 in 10 people in the country have seen this speech. The fact that the right hates her with a passion should be a plus, but it seems to be a minus in publicizing what she says.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.