Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Will Durst begins: "And now, another installment in the continuing saga that is The Herman Cain Sexual Harassment Soap Opera. When last we left him, the candidate was praising his main backers: 'The Koch Brothers are my brothers from another mother.' Guess we should be grateful he hasn't dismissed his accusers with an offhand: 'Bros before hoes.'"

Political satirist Will Durst. (photo: WillDurst.com)
Political satirist Will Durst. (photo: WillDurst.com)



Grope and Change

By Will Durst, Reader Supported News

12 November 11

 

nd now, another installment in the continuing saga that is The Herman Cain Sexual Harassment Soap Opera. When last we left him, the candidate was praising his main backers: "The Koch Brothers are my brothers from another mother." Guess we should be grateful he hasn't dismissed his accusers with an offhand: "Bros before hoes."

You could say the situation is fluid, or more precisely glutinous. It's hard to tell who or what to believe. Conservative talk shows pound home the theory this is all a put-up job while the liberal media remains incredulous the Cain Train hasn't derailed into a fiery pileup. Right now it all boils down to a classic case of He Said. She Said. She Said. She Said. She Said. She Said. She Said.

The good news for the first-ever, serious black Republican Presidential candidate is a new CBS poll reveals 61% of potential GOP primary participants don't consider the charges serious. Apparently there's a large contingent of voters who either believe girls lie or boys will be boys. In three short years this country has gone from Hope and Change to Grope and Change. Ain't life odd?

In his defense, Cain maintains he's never engaged in any inappropriate behavior. Ever. Really? Ever? Hell, if this Presidency thing doesn't work out, the guy should run for Pope. Or maybe he's better equipped to replace Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi. Of course, the term "inappropriate" is subjective. Fashionistas might call his cowboy hat highly inappropriate.

Cain's staff went so far as to say the sexual harassment allegations have actually helped the campaign. Helped! Wow. All he needs is a false imprisonment charge, he could sew this thing right up.

Cain has changed his story almost as often as Mitt Romney changes positions. And his memory problems draw right up to Rick Perry's Energy Department. Again, almost. First he couldn't remember anything, then admitted a charge may have been investigated, but there was no settlement, then maybe there was An Agreement, but now he refuses to comment on any of the cases, relentlessly retreating to his stuttering German "nein, nein, nein."

The oddly self-proclaimed anti-Washington corporate lobbyist declines any responsibility for keeping this narrative alive, first blaming the Perry campaign, then the Democratic Machine (?); and that old standby, the media, not yet getting around to the evil dominion that is Pizza Hut, but soon. Makes you wonder who's in charge of his damage control team? Lindsay Lohan? Anthony Weiner? Charley Sheen? Erica Kane?

He might be better off remembering the very advice he gave the Occupy Movement, "don't blame Wall Street, blame yourself." Yourself, Herman. Yourself. Besides, in most Democratic quarters, the prospect of a Barack Obama/Herman Cain match-up in the general election has elicited so much salivation, drool bibs and phlegm gutters are standard issue.

Another problem is the former CEO of Godfather's Pizza has demonstrated the sensitivity of a drunken bear. In a recent Detroit debate, he called House Minority Leader Pelosi, "Princess Nancy," which for a guy ensnared in sexual harassment assertions is like trying to light a cigar by sticking your face in a Tiki torch on a windy beach.

We're entering Daytime Emmy Award territory here, featuring a plot with more twists than a 300 foot telephone cord stuffed into a cardboard box and a cast of characters changing faster than a chameleon on a plaid tablecloth. I'm surprised neither Procter & Gamble or the makers of Slinky have jumped on the bandwagon offering to sponsor this candidacy, but stay tuned.


The New York Times says Emmy-nominated comedian and writer Will Durst "is quite possibly the best political satirist working in the country today." Check out the website: Redroom.com to find out more about upcoming stand-up performances or to buy his book, "The All American Sport of Bipartisan Bashing."

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+64 # chick 2011-11-12 14:36
Cain is another Thomas. Hope they do put him up against Obama.

Vote Democratic. Be in league with OWS those proud and brave young people fighting for us.
 
 
+22 # jwb110 2011-11-12 15:36
Quoting
Cain is another Thomas. Hope they do put him up against Obama.

Vote Democratic. Be in league with OWS those proud and brave young people fighting for us.


Cain and Thomas are also both guilty of having sexually harassed.
I don't get any TV news so can anybody answer me: How many of the women who complained were white?
 
 
+1 # AMLLLLL 2011-11-15 11:12
Cain and Thomas seem alike to me to; and the Koch's? Brothers from another gutter.
 
 
+54 # Barbara K 2011-11-12 15:21
Cain is a serial sexual predator. Apparently so many women involved that he can't remember them. He should be out of the race and is definitely not what we want in the White House. He was a buffoon in the first place and now this. He doesn't know anything about running the government, much less about being the President of the United States. What a disaster he is and the desperation of the Greedy Old Pigs who keep supporting him is sickening. He shows he has no respect for women every time he opens his mouth and the sneery way he said "Princess Nancy" about the first female Leader of the House is more telling about him than about her. Time to put this snake out to pasture.

NEVER VOTE REPUBLICAN !!
 
 
+40 # pernsey 2011-11-12 15:25
If it ends up being Cain and Obama (which I dont think it will) who will the prejudice south vote for? That could be interesting.

NEVER EVER VOTE REPUBLICAN!
 
 
+16 # jon 2011-11-12 17:37
"who will the prejudice south vote for?"

Just imagine the consternation, south of the Mason-Dixon Line.
 
 
+20 # fotografx 2011-11-12 15:49
When will you dense political pundits get it, Herman Cain as righttly revealed by Rachel Maddow is putting everyone on with theatricals. Have you not heard where "brothers from another mother" came from and what its comedic implications were in that context? Every one of Cain's quotes have poetic implications making fun of the entire process. Now that his campaign is not seen through for the theater it represents, he is in a different venue; but is he anymore the serious candidate he never was in the beginning. If the political thinkers believe Cain is real, the joke is not on Cain, it is on the media and all of the Republican non-thinkers Cain is spoofing.
 
 
0 # AMLLLLL 2011-11-15 11:15
Everyone from the Donald to Cain has been bankrolled by the itchy Koch brothers, enemies of democracy. The agenda here is to make Mitt look good. How's that working for them?...
 
 
+21 # Richard Raznikov 2011-11-12 15:58
How about a Cain-Paterno All-Predator ticket?
 
 
-53 # chomper2 2011-11-12 16:02
What a waste of time reading this. It's absolutely devoid of any content. I won't read anything else under his byline.
 
 
+9 # juliajayne 2011-11-13 08:00
Will is a satirist! Oh boy...
 
 
+41 # Glen 2011-11-12 16:13
Cain is not a serious candidate. Neither is Perry. Their behavior is despicable and when I heard Cain and his supporters making fun of Anita Hill it was even more obvious that we should all ignore these so called candidates and begin to demand more in any forum available. Entertainment is not what we need from those who seek even more power than they already have.
 
 
+50 # allie 2011-11-12 16:30
61% of republicans don't see his indiscretions as a problem??? This coming from the party of ill repute whose whores are ruining the country. One can imagine what they would be screaming if it was a Democrat running for President.
 
 
+27 # jon 2011-11-12 17:32
"One can imagine what they would be screaming if it was a Democrat running for President."

There is very little that can exceed Republican hypocrisy.

What a riot!
 
 
+4 # Cassandra2012 2011-11-13 14:12
Quoting
"One can imagine what they would be screaming if it was a Democrat running for President."

There is very little that can exceed Republican hypocrisy.

What a riot!

Yes, and now they are touting that colossal hypocrite, Newt Gingrich --- remember him? the 'family values' czar who served his wife DIVORCE PAPERS as she came out of anesthesia for a mastectomy??
Disgusting sexist hypocrite!
 
 
+1 # jon 2011-11-13 19:20
"who served his wife DIVORCE PAPERS as she came out of anesthesia for a mastectomy??"

I can not imagine a more mean-spirited act than that.

How could anybody with a heart that pumps anything warmer than anti-freeze and ice-water vote for such a clearly non-human as Newt.
 
 
+1 # boudreaux 2011-11-14 09:02
Quoting
"who served his wife DIVORCE PAPERS as she came out of anesthesia for a mastectomy??"

I can not imagine a more mean-spirited act than that.

How could anybody with a heart that pumps anything warmer than anti-freeze and ice-water vote for such a clearly non-human as Newt.


I will never forget to ugly things that he has done!!!
 
 
+5 # Glen 2011-11-14 08:34
Gingrich is worse than Cain or Perry. His warrior attitude far surpasses any support for waterboarding. His morals are corrupt and his methods heinous. I'm glad you brought him into this discussion. He hangs on like a wart.
 
 
+15 # Capn Canard 2011-11-12 17:33
Amen allie... the MSM would be busy 24/7 and bending over backward trying to crucify a so-called Liberal.
 
 
-1 # vitobonespur 2011-11-12 18:53
I hear ya, CC. The MSM would be TTL anyone who might have a SITC, but only if they are LRFO. They seem to be IB with the MIC and only do their bidding if it is TTOB, and as long as it's NARC. Fer sure! TAFN.
 
 
+19 # pernsey 2011-11-12 17:42
Quoting
61% of republicans don't see his indiscretions as a problem??? This coming from the party of ill repute whose whores are ruining the country. One can imagine what they would be screaming if it was a Democrat running for President.



Oh you betcha!! If Cain was a dem they would be mocking him and crying about morals LOL!
 
 
+24 # vitobonespur 2011-11-12 18:48
And these are the "good old boys" who tried to oust Bill Clinton...??? Amazing how the boulevard has become a one-way street.
 
 
0 # Carbonman1950 2011-11-14 18:18
Actually we don't near to imagine it.

You can't have forgotten all the Right Wing screaming and gnashing of teeth over Clinton? And of course there was all that noise they made about "restoring dignity to the office president".

At least the Clinton circus had only one ring. This "conservative" circus seems to have eight.
 
 
+39 # GeeRob 2011-11-12 16:41
Republicans don't even believe there's such a thing as sexual harassment. In "Republican Speak" sexual harassment is paying a woman a compliment.
They've authored 44 bills on abortion, 99 bills on religion, 71 bills on family relationships, 36 bills on marriage and ZERO bills on jobs.
 
 
+24 # PABLO DIABLO 2011-11-12 17:15
Anita Hill was a convenient distraction from the fact that Clarence Thomas was not qualified to be a Supreme (what would this world be like without Bush V. Gore or Citizens United). Are these women diverting the media from realizing that Cain is not qualified to run for President?
 
 
-4 # Merschrod 2011-11-13 03:38
I like it, that is a neat conspiracy theory Paul - go for it :>) It is sort of like the Kennedy assasination being the distraction from the real conspiracy!
 
 
+6 # Glen 2011-11-13 06:58
Paul, you do have a point. The agenda and amazing strategy of both parties actually is used as a diversionary tactic. Anita Hill did not come forward with her information, she was sought out to testify. Monica Lewinsky was a drop in the bucket of Bill Clinton's lasciviousness, and I will always believe she helped set him up. The impeachment, in spite of the 2000 election being fraudulent, helped guarantee no democrat would be elected. Consider what that impeachment overshadowed at the time, also. Attacking Iraq in the Bush Sr. years certainly took attention away from the Savings and Loan criminals, including his son.

The heinous motives of these two parties render them defunct as serious government organizations. Too bad there will never be serious reform.
 
 
+1 # Carbonman1950 2011-11-14 19:15
Lewinsky, well actually her mother, DID set Clinton up.

Who stores a semen stained dress in her freezer for, what was it, a year or two unless they've got a plan that motivates them to preserve the evidence?
 
 
0 # Glen 2011-11-17 13:45
Had not seen your post. You got the story too. Consider the results of that refrigeration and George W. inheriting the power.
 
 
0 # Carbonman1950 2011-11-14 18:24
I agree... sort of.
Anita Hill was not the distraction. She had a serious purpose and an apparently valid complaint.

What distracted us was Thomas' assertion that it was "a high-tech lynching." A black man claiming to be a victim of a lynching, caused virtually all of those with legitimate concerns about his judicial philosophy and moral and ethical fitness for that bench, to hide out of fear they would be called racists.

It seems to me Cain's use of the word lynching was also an intentional attempt to get his critics to flee in fear.

I hope that we learned our lesson with Thomas. Unfit is unfit. We should have stood our ground then and we should definitely stand our ground now.
 
 
+16 # Hexalpa 2011-11-12 17:24
True,
we don't want Cain in the WHITE HOUSE,
But I sure HOPE he is on the Republican ticket!!!
Dems who are taking pot-shots against him NOW are trigger-happy and short-sighted. It's not our job to help the GOP choose their most-electable candidate. Let them choose Cain (Fat Chance!)...Electable he ain't!!!
 
 
+32 # jon 2011-11-12 19:11
I do have one nagging fear.

I will not be surprised if this next election has an election fraud that will make the election of a central american generalissimo seem fair and above board.

We should start preparing for this. I am sure that the Rove team is working on it.

We need systems to counter this eventuality,
 
 
+10 # jcdav 2011-11-12 19:38
No suprize there- the whole process is easily sent off the rails...voting machines that can be hacked easily (designed by--tada republican run companies) and if it can be brought (bought?) to the SC well we all know where that goes now don't we.. one of the election reforms I would like to see is doing away with the electorial college-- popular vote only.
 
 
+21 # Pufferly 2011-11-12 19:42
I thought Koch-Cain was illegal.
 
 
+1 # David Starr 2011-11-13 12:06
Beautiful play on words on plays.
 
 
+13 # charsjcca 2011-11-12 20:05
Herman Cain is a card. If he had been manufactured in some machine shop from salvaged materials he would be discarded as not marketable. If I had been a civil rights advocate I would be disappointed. Being a Black Power advocate I am clear that what you see is a copy of several generations of Black/Colored/Negro/African-Americans who never understood the cultural history of America. Hence, all the bad information has been embraced. Scholar Ashley Montagu made the case decades ago that R-A-C-E was a non-concept, totally meaningless. Yet we hear so-called educated folks talking about humankind in terms of the bankrupt concept. Herman Cain has not shown that he knows the difference.
 
 
+9 # Merschrod 2011-11-13 03:34
Brothers...! Right on - in this case Cain bellies up to the Koch brother's table for campaign gluttonry, or is it that the Koch Brothers like the Pie at the Godfather's? Or are the Koch brothers the Godfathers?

But, let's face it - Arnie was a known groper and he was elected in CA. When it comes to keeping a grasp on privilage, some guys just do not know the difference.
 
 
+11 # lin96 2011-11-13 06:16
He's clearly taken his damage control from the Clarence Thomas handbook. It's to the point where people have called "racist" so many times that it's expected. The first rule of running as a Republican is lie, lie, lie. His ego is such that he actually believes the Democrats are paying that much attention to Mr. Pizza. He doesn't respect women...including his wife of 43 years. One does not have to argue about the truth....it proves itself. All this publicity he claims helps him, so why help him? I think it's time they thin the field of Republicans running for President. It's become trite and embarassing.
 
 
+11 # humanmancalvin 2011-11-13 08:39
The same 61% that would still vote for Cain the molester (despite their strong moral christian standards)are the same 61% that would cast a ballot for the serial adulterer Gingrich if lightening were to strike & he ended up on the slate. Yes Virginia, these are the very same hypocrites that screamed for President Clinton's head on a pike for engaging in CONSENSUAL sex. Republicans have less than zero sense of shame;they are the party of bend, twist, crumple, manipulate, & lie. Why do Republicans hate America & wish to see her destroyed?
 
 
+3 # jon 2011-11-13 19:27
"Why do Republicans hate America & wish to see her destroyed?"

For piles of money.
 
 
+1 # boudreaux 2011-11-14 09:10
Quoting
The same 61% that would still vote for Cain the molester (despite their strong moral christian standards)are the same 61% that would cast a ballot for the serial adulterer Gingrich if lightening were to strike & he ended up on the slate. Yes Virginia, these are the very same hypocrites that screamed for President Clinton's head on a pike for engaging in CONSENSUAL sex. Republicans have less than zero sense of shame;they are the party of bend, twist, crumple, manipulate, & lie. Why do Republicans hate America & wish to see her destroyed?



So the rich can keep getting richer and the poor will keep getting poorer, thats it in a nutshell.
I'll never forget the graph that Rachel Maddow showed us on TV before the repugs were voted back in that showed how when the repugs take the floor back that the repugs only concern was to keep the rich rich, and the one for the democratics showed how the scale worked out to the poors advantage....
 
 
+5 # barbie 2011-11-13 09:54
Herman Cain stinks
 
 
-8 # Robt Eagle 2011-11-13 13:07
Can't handle a successful Conservative? What is going to happen when the information comes out showing that these few anynomous women are all making up their accusations? Oh, no, Cain is a Conservative Republican so it is OK to crucify him without corroberation. Did you do the same for Bill Clinton?
 
 
+5 # Cassandra2012 2011-11-13 14:18
Stop calling these jokers 'conservative' they are conserving nothing. What they are is really Right Wing Radical Extremists masquerading as 'conservatives'.
And every time you hear them spit out 'Democrat Party' you know they are being deliberately obnoxious and ignorant. The DemocraTIC party has many flaws but it doesn't go around calling their opponents Repugnicans... or Rethugs, or what they really are---fascists.
 
 
+3 # jon 2011-11-13 19:35
Conservative, they are NOT.

Dwight Eisenhower is spinning in his grave!

These people are fascist money-grubbing opportunists that were enabled by Reagan doing away with the fairness in broadcasting act.

We would NOT be having this conversation today were it not for the great Nazi propaganda machine - lead by the primary owner, Murdoch, and his prostitutes, FOX news, Limbaugh, Hannity, O'Reily, Beck, etc., ad nauseum.

Conservatative = to conserve, or save, or harbor. NOT rip-off!
 
 
+2 # Sallyport 2011-11-13 19:35
Any time I feel somewhat comforted by the notion of Cain as the Republican nominee (by the thought that such a dope couldn't POSSIBLY win), I remember Ronald Reagan. Woops!

The KochCain gag is a winner, should really Crack people up.
 
 
+1 # boudreaux 2011-11-14 09:14
Who dresses like Cain, for the start of his campaion he looked like a player to me...He looks like a wanna be pimp and his words are just slogans that he learned while working at Godfathers....He is a liar just like the rest of them are....I would never consider him to be in the white house much less trying to run this country....heis a disgrace..
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.