Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Chapman writes: "Why is Rick Santorum running for president? Because America is in trouble and he knows why. Faith and family are under attack. 'Moral relativism' he warns, is breeding 'aberrant behavior.' Gay rights advocates are bent on 'secularization.' Liberals have brought about a 'decaying culture.'"

Rick Santorum, during a Republican presidential candidates' debate, 1/8/12. (photo: Reuters)
Rick Santorum, during a Republican presidential candidates' debate, 1/8/12. (photo: Reuters)



Rick Santorum's Moral Delusions

By Steve Chapman, The Chicago Tribune

08 January 12

 

Where's the evidence of a 'decaying culture'?

hy is Rick Santorum running for president? Because America is in trouble and he knows why.

Faith and family are under attack. "Moral relativism," he warns, is breeding "aberrant behavior." Gay rights advocates are bent on "secularization." Liberals have brought about a "decaying culture."

Santorum insists that gay marriage will destroy the family, "the very foundation of our country." Lamenting the scandal of pedophile priests, he wrote in a Catholic publication: "When the culture is sick, every element in it becomes infected. While it is no excuse for this scandal, it is no surprise that Boston, a seat of academic, political and cultural liberalism in America, lies at the center of the storm."

It's a familiar line of argument among religious conservatives, and it has the virtues of clarity, simplicity and plausibility. But there is one notable weakness in his case: a mass of evidence that amounts to a thunderous refutation.

Santorum takes it for granted that religious belief, at least of the Christian variety, is a powerful force for moral behavior. That's not apparent from looking at this country.

He thinks America has been on a downhill slide for many years, thanks to feminism, gay rights, pornography and other vile intruders. But where is the evidence that the developments cited by Santorum are producing harmful side effects?

In the past couple of decades, most indicators of moral and social health have gotten better, not worse. Crime has plummeted. Teen pregnancy has declined by 39 percent. Abortion rates among adolescents are less than half of what they were.

The incidence of divorce is down. As of 2007, 48 percent of high school students had engaged in sex, compared to 54 percent in 1991. What decaying culture is he talking about?

It sounds obvious that when people practice a religion that preaches strong morality and responsible conduct, they will behave better than people who follow their own inclinations. But what is obvious is not always true.

America is a good place to judge the value of faith in promoting virtue. There is a great deal of variation among the 50 states in religious observance - and a great deal of variation in social ills. It turns out that religiosity does not translate into good behavior, and disregard for religion does not go hand-in-hand with vice. Quite the contrary.

Consider homicide, which is not only socially harmful but a violation of one of the Ten Commandments. Mississippi has the highest rate of church attendance in America, according to a Gallup survey, with 63 percent of people saying they go to church "weekly or almost weekly." But Mississippians are far more likely to be murdered than other Americans.

On the other hand, we have Vermont, where people are the most likely to skip church. Its murder rate is only about one-fourth as high as the rest of the country. New Hampshire, the second-least religious state, has the lowest murder rate.

These are no flukes. Of the 10 states with the most worshippers, all but one have higher than average homicide rates. Of the 11 states with the lowest church attendance, by contrast, 10 have low homicide rates.

Teen pregnancy also tends to follow a course precisely the opposite of what Santorum preaches. Almost every one of the most religious states suffers from more teen pregnancy than the norm - while the least religious ones enjoy less.

What impact does gay marriage have on how kids handle sex? Massachusetts, the first state to legalize it, has less teen pregnancy than the country as a whole. Connecticut, Iowa, New Hampshire and Vermont, which have also sanctioned same-sex unions, are also far better than average.

Does gay marriage undermine the health and stability of heterosexual marriage? Not so you can tell. Massachusetts has the nation's lowest divorce rate. Iowa and Connecticut are also better than most. Vermont and New Hampshire are about average. In the Bible Belt, by contrast, marriages are generally more prone to break up.

Santorum presents himself as a man of faith who insists on confronting stark facts that many people would rather ignore. In fact, in his indictment of tolerance, individual conscience, sexual freedom and secular morality, he is not telling truths but spinning sanctimonious fairy tales. American culture is not sick, and Santorum is no healer.

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+94 # Tippitc 2012-01-08 14:05
What Santorum 'preaches' strikes me as self-righteous BS - who died and left him the throne?! Most religious conservatives strike me as VERY judgemental - doesn't it say something in that book they like to wave around about "judge not that you be not judged". Keep your religion out of politics and don't even start with 'family values' - I'll throw up!!
 
 
+2 # mwd870 2012-01-10 04:07
I hope Santorum's judgmental attitude leads him right out of the primary race and the limelight. He's polling pretty low New Hampshire. I'd rather none of them "won" the primary tonight, but a good scenario would be Gingrich and Santorum tied for last.
 
 
+40 # psadave 2012-01-08 22:32
Hey, these darn facts are getting in the way again! Santorum knows how things are "supposed to be!"
 
 
+32 # Joan Manning 2012-01-08 22:55
It's not just the Christians that haven't done so well in the morals department. Look at the Middle East. The Jews and Muslims haven't done very well, either. Seems to me religion restricts people and keeps them adhering to ancient ideas and rejecting current wisdom. There are a few exceptions, of course, but only a few.
 
 
+18 # RLF 2012-01-09 05:12
Is what you're trying to say that it appears that the quickest way to be immoral and evil is to be self righteously religious? That is how it appears.
 
 
+5 # kelly 2012-01-09 12:57
Got any proof otherwise? Spanish inquisition, the crusades, 9/11, then there is the Old Testament, the Catholic church helping Nazis escape into S.America after WWII, if I went on I'd run out of space. Suffice it to say, the answer is yes. Unless of course you're simply being sarcastic. In which case, I'm still glad to provide these as ways to make the case.
 
 
+2 # Texas Aggie 2012-01-09 15:41
"With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things, and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion." - Steven Weinberg

Mexico is one of the most religious countries that there is, but immoral and evil behavior are endemic in the society. They even have a word for those who wear their religion on their sleeve but practice the opposite in private, "mocho". It describes Santorum to a t because he was the senator go-to person for Delay's K St. project and he was the one who introduced legislation attempting to privatize weather forecasting for the benefit of AccuWeather, a private company who donated $5,000 to his cause.
 
 
+28 # gentle 2012-01-08 23:34
Another GOP candidate sent by God. You would think that God was smarter than that, picking a man like Cain and then going with Rick? (Sorry can not even use his last name)
 
 
+39 # m... 2012-01-09 00:38
NOTHING but NOTHING has brought about the moral decay, decline and 'greedification' of America more than the Business Modeling of American Government on all levels through relentless deregulation and detaxation schemes on behalf of Gigantic Global Corporate Want and Greed and the Corporate Contracting out of OUR Government Functions into a million bits and corporate-profitable, we-the-people useless pieces as if ALL Americans exist as Corporate Cash Cows here to serve the Global Corporate Agenda and the simple legal mandate to increase shareholder wealth as 'Constitution'.., with the Bill of Rights reduced to devolving Consumer Rights.
Mitt Romney and the Republicans and Conservatives are still selling this 'Business Model Government'.., aka, 'SMALLER GOVERNMENT'.., aka, 'Less Government' as if it is the uncontested, unquestioned gospel-paved road to Salvation, Liberty, Freedom and Prosperity for All even when we now have a 30 year history of DISMANTLED Government turned Corporate Government by Corporate Lobby screaming another reality--> A CORRUPTABLE FAILURE! FAILURE! FAILURE! for ALL except the now super dooper wealthy and powerful 1% who reaped the largest transfer of wealth and power in history without firing a shot--> from the 99% unto the 1%.., which is what the whole damn Business Model-Smaller-Less-Government flim flam, ConJob Corporate CONservative Endeavor has been all about from day one of the foisted Reagan Revolution.
 
 
+27 # Barbara K 2012-01-09 05:02
Amen to you! The Republicans have brought about the decay of America and you say it well.


NEVER VOTE REPUBLICAN !!

our future and liveliehoods are at stake
 
 
+16 # marthooo 2012-01-09 07:52
Thank you for bringing in economics--money is god in this culture, really, ...lip service to morals and values. We all know that, right? So, when it's about religion-it's sadly, so frequently, really not about religion, but about power and $. (...the unco-opted teachings of Christ, for instance, were all about tolerance, listening, stewardship of creations, and being equal at the table...not conducive to the 1% or to using up our entire planet.)
 
 
+42 # Critic46 2012-01-09 04:13
The religion truly practiced by Santorum and other destructive regressives is 'Hypocrisy.' That religion is far more destructive of morality and ethics than the lack of devotion by others.
 
 
+29 # wsh 2012-01-09 04:40
Facts, facts, facts...that's all you have, Chapman; while Santorum has faith.

Hey, how 'bout we elect Santorum Pope (seems to be what he's running for anyway), and leave the Presidency to Obama?
 
 
+40 # corallady 2012-01-09 04:43
Not too long ago the Republican House of Representatives wasted time reaffirming the national motto "In God We Trust" instead of dealing with what needed to be taken care of. The motto is utter nonsense since this country does not trust in God--nor should it; the motto should not be on our money, and "under God," more untruth and pious nonsense, should not be part of the Pledge of Allegiance. Religion may have a part to play in culture, but it should not be part of politics and government. And the truth is that America doesn't really trust in God anyway; America really trusts in guns and money, so why pretend that we trust in God? And pretense is exactly what it is. If Santorum should by some chance become the Republican nominee, voters should take a good look into his "closet," where many skeletons hang that give the lie to his sanctimonious utterances. Don't listen to what overly religious people say; take a good look at what they do. If religious belief really matters, a person doesn't have to talk about it.
Santorum said that Iran should not be allowed to develop the bomb because that country is a theocracy and their religion makes martyrdom a goal, so mutually assured destruction would not be a deterrant to using the bomb. Now,he would like nothing better than to make America a theocracy; and, while the goal would not be martyrdom, a theocratic government would destroy the country in other ways. America, take a close look at this man before voting for him.
 
 
+31 # head out the window 2012-01-09 05:18
the biggest sign of cultural destruction is that this guy is seriously considered for the office of the presidency.
 
 
+18 # universlman 2012-01-09 05:19
apparently they are unhappy with a system allowing the exercise of individual freedoms by others that make them uncomfortable

the endless stream of religious judgment from the mouths of all of the republican candidates exposes a longing for a system of force that is the opposite of their worn capitalist rant - they are blind to how silly this makes them look
 
 
+25 # humanmancalvin 2012-01-09 06:33
This man suffers from religious delusion. The delusion being: if you do not subscribe to the same rigid dogma as I, then you are sinful, will go to hell & take the rest of the world down below with you. All of the scientific advances in modern history do not convince these delusionist's of any point contrary to their divine belief system. Use birth control of ANY form? Plague, locusts and floods. And right on down the crazy lane. America is in enough of a tizzy without ever electing a witch-doctor like Santorum as its president. help me Rhonda!
 
 
+3 # marthooo 2012-01-09 07:32
Yes, many facts here, but I appreciate the comments that bring economics into the picture. The states and commonwealths Mr. Chapman holds up as models tend to be on the upper end of average income states; Mississippi-dead last, Texas. for all of it's industry probably demonstrates some of the worst "gap" and comes in around 25th. There are facts that also show the correlation between stress/poverty and violence/access to health care.
I'm not refuting at all Mr. Chapman's points, just saying sometimes facts can be used as rhetoric, too, and violence and ignorance can be the result of complex equations.
 
 
+4 # Texas Aggie 2012-01-09 15:50
The problem here is do whackjob religious people cause the dysfunctional social system in places like TX, or does a social system like we have here in TX make people turn to some sort of Daliesque religion in order to make sense of the world around them? The increase in fundamentalism during times of social strife seem to indicate the latter. However, when things have been settled for a while, as occurred prior to W, then it could be argued that whackjob religions are responsible for the social situation.
 
 
+1 # kelly 2012-01-09 16:32
Hey, Gig 'em! You could goo back to any time in history with that chicken-and-egg analogy couldn't you? From times of the plague in Europe and so on, uninformed or undereducated people usually cling to religion when confronted with the tragically inexplicable. However, one of the recent, ridiculous examples I've seen is when Rick Perry(there's no brain up there I think it's some sort of growth pressing outward on his "do") called for a day of prayer to bring rain for our drought-ridden state. Which came first? Whackjob religions, whackjob situations or whackjob politicians?
 
 
+15 # elmont 2012-01-09 07:46
These facts have obviously been around for a while, but occasional repetition doesn't hurt. The Red states have higher levels of social dysfuntion--by just about every measure--than do the Blue states. One of those inconvenient truths buried under a tsunami of posturing religious self-righteousness.
 
 
+2 # marthooo 2012-01-09 08:23
I'm a disenchanted Blue living in a Red state; I would love to see the measures you mention. Can you expound?
Wall Street is in a Blue State...Hmmm. I guess that's functional, just not the way I'd like it to be. :-)
 
 
+4 # Texas Aggie 2012-01-09 15:52
Check out divorce rate, teen pregnancy rate, violent crime, use of internet pornography, rape, etc. The Bible Belt leads in all of those categories.
 
 
+2 # normosca 2012-01-09 08:54
Right! The churchgoing (leading!) priests of Santorum's moral abiding church are perfect examples of how religion keeps us morally observant!
 
 
+2 # kelly 2012-01-09 15:26
Observant or subservient? Other words might include servile, slavish or obsequious but I can't see observant.
 
 
+3 # fotografx 2012-01-09 09:16
What Steve says is all true, but the culture is still sick and not working for people irrelevant as religion is, because in many parts of America there is no community. You can thank urbanization and particularly suburbs for that, what corporations have built and sold America on is a loss of the positive values and influence a community provides. The place cited that have the best social records of behavior are those which have not grown, and been suburbanized. Take a look at the Los Angels area which is labyrinth of suburbs and lacks and kind of community. The result is not so good socially. You need both self sufficient , free thinking people and a community that supports people working and living together . Family is important but now less than half the adult population are married, part of a family. They need to be part of something that works with and for them, a community.
David B. Brooks
 
 
+5 # kelly 2012-01-09 13:13
Suburbs...didn't suburbs really begin to pop-up when I was a kid? And why was that? Oh yeah, I remember...because all the people were scared to send their kids to schools that might be less efficient because they were gonna be "mixed". No more black school/white school. This was not the case when someone like Paul was growing up and I'm sure Santorum never dealt with it. Isolationism within the our daily lives is killing us from the inside out and is beginning to affect us on the world-wide level. Community is a good idea. As Hillary said, it takes a village and if it is a city, state, nation or world wide effort so be it if it can bring peace and health to us all.
 
 
+8 # Feral Dogz 2012-01-09 10:39
Sure signs of a decaying culture can be seen in a broken health care system, decaying infrastructure, de-funding of the arts, the near collapse of the economy and rampant corruption among elected officials and business leaders. These problems were not brought about by liberals or the social safety nets most Americans benefit by that conservatives would destroy. I fear for a nation where the other Rick seems like a good choice for flavor of the week. Shame on the media for giving this nutcase any credibility.
 
 
+5 # MJnevetS 2012-01-09 11:11
I take (minor) exception with the comments of corallady:

"the Republican House of Representatives wasted time reaffirming the national motto "In God We Trust" instead of dealing with what needed to be taken care of." This was actually a necessary step, regarding the American currency. They needed to have people put their faith in god regarding our currency/system of banking, because only an idiot would have faith in our government regulating the banking system. Also, (on a more serious note), as to "under God," as part of the Pledge of Allegiance. It is of recent origin. The "pledge of allegiance" was written in 1892 by a Baptist, socialist minister. It originally read "I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." It first appeared in The Youth's Companion, a magazine for school children to PROMOTE SALES OF THE MAGAZINE! The words 'under God' were first suggested in 1952 and amended in 1954 after Eisenhower was implored during a sermon by a Presbyterian minister. It was then introduced as a bill on February 8, 1954, by Rep. Charles Oakman (R-Mich.). Congress passed the necessary legislation and Eisenhower signed the bill into law on Flag Day, June 14, 1954. So, people who use that as an example of 'proof' of what our forefathers intended have their heads up their collective arses! (Cont'd)
 
 
+6 # jwb110 2012-01-09 11:29
The Boston Diocese had the biggest coverup of the pedophile scandal. The largest number of cases and the greatest dollar payouts happened in Dallas, Texas, hardly a bastion of liberal thought.
 
 
+8 # MJnevetS 2012-01-09 12:07
Cont'd.:
Also, you note "Santorum said that Iran should not be allowed to develop the bomb because that country is a theocracy and their religion makes martyrdom a goal...and, while the goal would not be martyrdom", I take exception with that comment too. Their are too many evangelicals wetting themselves with orgasmic glee over the though of 'end times'. They would like nothing more than the destruction of the earth so they can 'rise up' and be with their savior. It is what makes the religious right as scary as any jihadist. Santorum was (unfortunately) my and I was only too happy to see him go. Considering his prior behavior on the national stage, I am shocked he has made a run for president which anyone takes seriously. He is one of the most dangerous G.O.P. candidates in a collection which displays the Republican party's complete disregard of the needs and well-being of the citizens of this country.
 
 
+3 # Texas Aggie 2012-01-09 16:01
I had left PA before Santorum came along, but my family remained, so I had heard about him. Maybe you could expound a bit on his activities as senator beyond the K St. project and his advocacy for privatizing weather reporting at the behest of a PA based private weather company.
 
 
+12 # angelfish 2012-01-09 12:41
Santorum would do better in Iraq, Iran or Afghanistan where he could run for Ayatollah. THERE, he would be elected in a heartbeat! He is a sad and sorry excuse for an American Presidential Candidate.
 
 
+4 # Texas Aggie 2012-01-09 15:58
There is a lot of truth in your statement. If Santorum had been born into a fundamentalist Islamic family, he, too, would be a jihadist. It isn't his particular faith that makes him what he is. He would be the same no matter what faith he followed, just using different words to say the same thing.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.