Chapman writes: "Why is Rick Santorum running for president? Because America is in trouble and he knows why. Faith and family are under attack. 'Moral relativism' he warns, is breeding 'aberrant behavior.' Gay rights advocates are bent on 'secularization.' Liberals have brought about a 'decaying culture.'"
Rick Santorum, during a Republican presidential candidates' debate, 1/8/12. (photo: Reuters)
Rick Santorum's Moral Delusions
08 January 12
Where's the evidence of a 'decaying culture'?
hy is Rick Santorum running for president? Because America is in trouble and he knows why.
Faith and family are under attack. "Moral relativism," he warns, is breeding "aberrant behavior." Gay rights advocates are bent on "secularization." Liberals have brought about a "decaying culture."
Santorum insists that gay marriage will destroy the family, "the very foundation of our country." Lamenting the scandal of pedophile priests, he wrote in a Catholic publication: "When the culture is sick, every element in it becomes infected. While it is no excuse for this scandal, it is no surprise that Boston, a seat of academic, political and cultural liberalism in America, lies at the center of the storm."
It's a familiar line of argument among religious conservatives, and it has the virtues of clarity, simplicity and plausibility. But there is one notable weakness in his case: a mass of evidence that amounts to a thunderous refutation.
Santorum takes it for granted that religious belief, at least of the Christian variety, is a powerful force for moral behavior. That's not apparent from looking at this country.
He thinks America has been on a downhill slide for many years, thanks to feminism, gay rights, pornography and other vile intruders. But where is the evidence that the developments cited by Santorum are producing harmful side effects?
In the past couple of decades, most indicators of moral and social health have gotten better, not worse. Crime has plummeted. Teen pregnancy has declined by 39 percent. Abortion rates among adolescents are less than half of what they were.
The incidence of divorce is down. As of 2007, 48 percent of high school students had engaged in sex, compared to 54 percent in 1991. What decaying culture is he talking about?
It sounds obvious that when people practice a religion that preaches strong morality and responsible conduct, they will behave better than people who follow their own inclinations. But what is obvious is not always true.
America is a good place to judge the value of faith in promoting virtue. There is a great deal of variation among the 50 states in religious observance - and a great deal of variation in social ills. It turns out that religiosity does not translate into good behavior, and disregard for religion does not go hand-in-hand with vice. Quite the contrary.
Consider homicide, which is not only socially harmful but a violation of one of the Ten Commandments. Mississippi has the highest rate of church attendance in America, according to a Gallup survey, with 63 percent of people saying they go to church "weekly or almost weekly." But Mississippians are far more likely to be murdered than other Americans.
On the other hand, we have Vermont, where people are the most likely to skip church. Its murder rate is only about one-fourth as high as the rest of the country. New Hampshire, the second-least religious state, has the lowest murder rate.
These are no flukes. Of the 10 states with the most worshippers, all but one have higher than average homicide rates. Of the 11 states with the lowest church attendance, by contrast, 10 have low homicide rates.
Teen pregnancy also tends to follow a course precisely the opposite of what Santorum preaches. Almost every one of the most religious states suffers from more teen pregnancy than the norm - while the least religious ones enjoy less.
What impact does gay marriage have on how kids handle sex? Massachusetts, the first state to legalize it, has less teen pregnancy than the country as a whole. Connecticut, Iowa, New Hampshire and Vermont, which have also sanctioned same-sex unions, are also far better than average.
Does gay marriage undermine the health and stability of heterosexual marriage? Not so you can tell. Massachusetts has the nation's lowest divorce rate. Iowa and Connecticut are also better than most. Vermont and New Hampshire are about average. In the Bible Belt, by contrast, marriages are generally more prone to break up.
Santorum presents himself as a man of faith who insists on confronting stark facts that many people would rather ignore. In fact, in his indictment of tolerance, individual conscience, sexual freedom and secular morality, he is not telling truths but spinning sanctimonious fairy tales. American culture is not sick, and Santorum is no healer.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |











Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Mexico is one of the most religious countries that there is, but immoral and evil behavior are endemic in the society. They even have a word for those who wear their religion on their sleeve but practice the opposite in private, "mocho". It describes Santorum to a t because he was the senator go-to person for Delay's K St. project and he was the one who introduced legislation attempting to privatize weather forecasting for the benefit of AccuWeather, a private company who donated $5,000 to his cause.
Mitt Romney and the Republicans and Conservatives are still selling this 'Business Model Government'.., aka, 'SMALLER GOVERNMENT'.., aka, 'Less Government' as if it is the uncontested, unquestioned gospel-paved road to Salvation, Liberty, Freedom and Prosperity for All even when we now have a 30 year history of DISMANTLED Government turned Corporate Government by Corporate Lobby screaming another reality--> A CORRUPTABLE FAILURE! FAILURE! FAILURE! for ALL except the now super dooper wealthy and powerful 1% who reaped the largest transfer of wealth and power in history without firing a shot--> from the 99% unto the 1%.., which is what the whole damn Business Model-Smaller-Less-Government flim flam, ConJob Corporate CONservative Endeavor has been all about from day one of the foisted Reagan Revolution.
NEVER VOTE REPUBLICAN !!
our future and liveliehoods are at stake
Hey, how 'bout we elect Santorum Pope (seems to be what he's running for anyway), and leave the Presidency to Obama?
Santorum said that Iran should not be allowed to develop the bomb because that country is a theocracy and their religion makes martyrdom a goal, so mutually assured destruction would not be a deterrant to using the bomb. Now,he would like nothing better than to make America a theocracy; and, while the goal would not be martyrdom, a theocratic government would destroy the country in other ways. America, take a close look at this man before voting for him.
the endless stream of religious judgment from the mouths of all of the republican candidates exposes a longing for a system of force that is the opposite of their worn capitalist rant - they are blind to how silly this makes them look
I'm not refuting at all Mr. Chapman's points, just saying sometimes facts can be used as rhetoric, too, and violence and ignorance can be the result of complex equations.
Wall Street is in a Blue State...Hmmm. I guess that's functional, just not the way I'd like it to be. :-)
David B. Brooks
"the Republican House of Representatives wasted time reaffirming the national motto "In God We Trust" instead of dealing with what needed to be taken care of." This was actually a necessary step, regarding the American currency. They needed to have people put their faith in god regarding our currency/system of banking, because only an idiot would have faith in our government regulating the banking system. Also, (on a more serious note), as to "under God," as part of the Pledge of Allegiance. It is of recent origin. The "pledge of allegiance" was written in 1892 by a Baptist, socialist minister. It originally read "I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." It first appeared in The Youth's Companion, a magazine for school children to PROMOTE SALES OF THE MAGAZINE! The words 'under God' were first suggested in 1952 and amended in 1954 after Eisenhower was implored during a sermon by a Presbyterian minister. It was then introduced as a bill on February 8, 1954, by Rep. Charles Oakman (R-Mich.). Congress passed the necessary legislation and Eisenhower signed the bill into law on Flag Day, June 14, 1954. So, people who use that as an example of 'proof' of what our forefathers intended have their heads up their collective arses! (Cont'd)
Also, you note "Santorum said that Iran should not be allowed to develop the bomb because that country is a theocracy and their religion makes martyrdom a goal...and, while the goal would not be martyrdom", I take exception with that comment too. Their are too many evangelicals wetting themselves with orgasmic glee over the though of 'end times'. They would like nothing more than the destruction of the earth so they can 'rise up' and be with their savior. It is what makes the religious right as scary as any jihadist. Santorum was (unfortunately) my and I was only too happy to see him go. Considering his prior behavior on the national stage, I am shocked he has made a run for president which anyone takes seriously. He is one of the most dangerous G.O.P. candidates in a collection which displays the Republican party's complete disregard of the needs and well-being of the citizens of this country.
RSS feed for comments to this post.