Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Intro: "The grades for the president's State of the Union are in and the critics have been kind. In fact, it's chilling to see just how few hits the president takes for couching his entire address in unqualified celebration of the US military."

President Barack Obama delivers his State of the Union address on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 24, 2012, as Vice President Joe Biden and House Speaker John Boehner, right, listen. (photo: Saul Loeb/AP)
President Barack Obama delivers his State of the Union address on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 24, 2012, as Vice President Joe Biden and House Speaker John Boehner, right, listen. (photo: Saul Loeb/AP)



Not A Peep About President's Praise for War

By Laura Flanders, The Nation

27 January 12

 

he grades for the president's State of the Union are in and the critics have been kind. In fact, it's chilling to see just how few hits the president takes for couching his entire address in unqualified celebration of the US military.

Speaking of the troops, President Obama began: "At a time when too many of our institutions have let us down, they exceed all expectations."

Post-show pundits on cable news praised the president's comfort with his commander-in-chief role but none saw fit to mention recent news - of marines urinating on Afghan corpses, say, or Staff Sgt Wuterich walking free after participating in the killing of 24 unarmed men, women and children in Haditha, Iraq. Accompanying Obama's next phrase, "Imagine what we could accomplish if we followed their example," no one thus far has played vile viral video. The critics have been kind.

The president chose to celebrate the US military; the press chose not to raise a peep about the spread of US militarism. Yet US targets proliferate - abroad - with unmanned drones assassinating unconvicted suspects in innumerable undeclared wars. And militarism spreads at home. The 2012 National Defense Authorization Act makes indefinite military detention without charge or trial a permanent feature of the American legal system.  It's kind of the critics not to mention that - or the president's four-year-old pledge to close Guantanamo, and to restore the "rule of law."

"They're not consumed with personal ambition… They work together," continued the president (again, speaking of the troops.) There are surely plenty of troops who would disagree. The tally is long of commanders and pigeon hawk commanders-of-commanders who've dodged responsibility, fingered underlings and permitted rank-and-file "bad-apples" to take the heat for US war crimes.

"Those of us who've been sent here to serve can learn a thing or two from the service of our troops," the president concluded.

There are indeed things we can learn; things that many US troops have begged us to learn. That war dehumanizes the killer and the killed, and that war tactics have a habit of spreading from the war zone to the home. Successive generations have told us that military recruiters lie, and that "rules of war" exist only in legal minds. (Ninety percent of casualties in the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were civilians.) Troops have begged us to learn just what we are celebrating when we celebrate "winning" and war.

As far as I can see, Ralph Nader on Democracy Now was the lone voice of disgust on national TV.

Clearly we have a lot to learn.

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+35 # jlohman 2012-01-27 08:27
Follow the money, Laura. The defense industry drives our wars and are major campaign contributors. "Bribes" is more accurate. It would be pure political suicide to attack wars.

Jack Lohman
http://MoneyedPoliticians.net
 
 
+21 # John Locke 2012-01-27 09:58
jlohman: Follow the money even further, Wall Street banks are the largest block of investors in the defense industry, The Picture gets ever bigger...
 
 
+6 # jlohman 2012-01-27 13:01
Thanks John. I'd not even thought of that. The corruption is even deeper. These politicians are not so dumb after all.
 
 
+12 # MidwestTom 2012-01-27 08:59
Nothing shows how disconnected our elected officials are from the general population than their continuous support of more and more wars. What would happen if we told the Middle East that we are out of here. The crazys would not have anybody to hate, and the citizens may then start looking at their own governments and demand improvements. Every Dictator needs an enemy, and inmost cases, that is us.
 
 
+19 # walt 2012-01-27 09:04
Thankfully someone else feels the same.

Obama has proven to be a war-monger and not a man of peace. His use of drone attacks shows this well. He continually patronizes the US military and caters to the neocons who love to use our military for their battles and not real defense of the USA.

The line in his speech that shocked me was when he claimed his most prized possession was the signed flag carried on the mission to kill Bin Laden. That's a sad commentary, especially when Bin Laden was unarmed!
 
 
+12 # Richard Raznikov 2012-01-27 09:53
Now the sucker’s dead and the President’s got a flag commemorating the occasion. I’m so proud I could just puke.
 
 
-9 # AlWight 2012-01-27 10:47
So were the 3,000 plus Americans who died in the twin towers.
 
 
-2 # AlWight 2012-01-27 10:58
Laura and the commentors probably have never served in the military. We need to make a distinction between wars politicians get us into and the patriotic citizens who fight and die in these wars. The grunts who do the fighting are no different from other human beings, and will make mistakes, some even criminal mistakes, but what about the senseless wars like Afghanistan and Iraq which have resulted in countless deaths and destroyed or disrupted an untold number of lives? I don't defend Obama. I think he means well, but is influenced too much by right wing warmongers and seeking the Jewish vote. We need more negotiation and less bullying and dictating. I served nine years in WWII and the Korean War, by the way, wars that I felt were justified.
 
 
+1 # Glen 2012-01-28 07:38
Al, I can't figure out why you received thumbs down. Your comments are pertinent and to the point, both about the Jewish vote and war mongers causing "countless deaths", etc. Also same with politicians vs. soldiers. War is always debatable and we need to protest them mightily, but as you say, the war guys cannot be stopped.
 
 
+12 # John Locke 2012-01-27 12:03
walt: Why do you think Bin Laden was murdered...and yes it was a homocide... the real reason the US could not afford for him to appear in any trial here, and what would have been exposed. Many of the families of 9-11 that lost relatives in the Trade Center still believe it was an inside job and our government was implicated... It was...AND there is No evidence Bin Ladin was involved.... we only have the "statemets" from government interpeters...In fact Bin Ladin claimed he had nothing to do with the attack...see more below
 
 
+8 # John Locke 2012-01-27 12:06
CNN reported on September 21, 2001,

The Taliban … refused to hand over bin Laden without proof or evidence that he was involved in last week’s attacks on the United States. … The Taliban ambassador to Pakistan … said Friday that deporting him without proof would amount to an “insult to Islam.”

CNN also provided an explanation for the Taliban’s “refusal,” reporting: “Bin Laden himself has already denied he had anything to do with the attacks, and Taliban officials repeatedly said he could not have been involved in the attacks.”

So the Taliban were not really refusing to turn him over but rather were demanding certain conditions be satisfied before they did so. That is not unusual. Governments routinely have evidentiary standards that must be met before they grant an extradition request. Bush, however, was not in a diplomatic mood, and he told the Taliban “the demands were not open to negotiation or discussion.”

The refusal by the Bush administration to put any evidence on the table made it extremely difficult, if not impossible, for the Taliban to turn bin Laden over.

The Washington Post ran a story in October 2001 that quoted Milton Bearden, a former CIA official, who said the Taliban needed a “face-saving formula.” While the Bush administration was saying, “Give up bin Laden,” the Taliban were saying, “Do something to help us give him up.”
 
 
+7 # John Locke 2012-01-27 12:09
The Bush administration had NO evidence Bin Ladin was implicated in the 9-11 attack... they could NOT produce one shread of evidence...However Unicol wanted the pipeline and that was the excuse....and the Trade center was an inside job accordingly (3) passports of three of the alleged hijackers suddenly appeared in perfect condition on top of all the debris (intact and not even scorched ...
 
 
+11 # Glen 2012-01-27 09:17
And how about the cheering after Obama's comments on everything still on the table for Iran? Nobody even blinked but John Stewart.
 
 
+8 # Jim Rocket 2012-01-27 11:56
The massive cheering for military action against Iran was disturbing but the lonely 12 people that clapped when Obama said that a peaceful resolution was still possible really frightened me.
Guess I should invest in some arms manufacturers because it looks like they got another good year coming.
 
 
+1 # Glen 2012-01-27 16:24
If you read certain investment publications, who do not see investments in certain industries as a moral choice, then yes, you just might be tempted due to the profits to be had. It's the name of the game in today's immoral world.

We live in a time of showmanship and games only. Many of us grieve for the loss of anything resembling decent statesmanship and international cooperation.
 
 
+1 # John Gill 2012-01-28 02:09
and Ralph Nader. He blinked a lot :)
 
 
+11 # Buddha 2012-01-27 09:41
The Military Industrial Complex is alive and well in Obama's administration, for a few reasons. First is of course the huge campaign donations they give that cements their hold on our politicians. Second is the dynamic that the Dems do not want to appear "weak on national defense", and want to take that avenue of attack away from the GOP. And third and relatedly, WHEN then next terrorist attack occurs, any serious cuts in military spending or deployment will in knee-jerk fashion be blamed as the cause, and no President or Party wants to take that blame. So...other nations will get great nationalized health care...and we'll get F-22 flyovers at the SuperBowl and our youth dying in Middle-East deserts to bullets bought with our petrodollars.
 
 
+6 # spiritcallsus 2012-01-27 09:47
The COMMANDER IN CHEAP SPEECH has done it again.
 
 
+6 # Richard Raznikov 2012-01-27 09:50
Although my voice reaches a lot fewer people, I did not let Obama's bizarre militarism go by without comment. See my column here:

http://lookingglass.blog.co.uk/2012/01/26/i-m-so-proud-12528363/
 
 
+6 # John Locke 2012-01-27 11:48
Richard Raznikov: I did read your blog. It was truthful...And I for one appreciate anyone who is trying to bring light into this darkness.
 
 
+6 # davidhp 2012-01-27 12:13
While the president if busy starting and continuing wars of aggression, his secretary of defense called for limits on pay raises for military members and an increase in health insurance cost for military retirees. While I served for 22 years on active duty, I was promised free medical for myself and my dependents for the rest of my life - so quickly the government forgets those who serve the people. Obama never wore a uniform but is quick to send military off to die for corporate profits.
 
 
+3 # panhead49 2012-01-27 14:56
Aside from the other physical maladies I suffer from I now also have to deal with the Presidential knife in my back. When he ran, he said he'd bring in Cat 8 veterans all into the system at a rate of 25% per year. He moved that time frame up by just eliminating that entire category of Veterans. I even begged to be allowed to pay a premium to the VA as I've been shut out of the private insurance market. Uh, Thanks Prez?

Tis true that 'how do you know a politico is lying - their lips are moving'.
 
 
+4 # Susan W 2012-01-27 13:43
This is just one more example of how people are unable to care about anyone other than themselves and are also too ignorant to connect the dots between the bloated, out of control military and the economic troubles at home.

This works out very well for O and his handlers; they can keep the dumb citizens busy worrying about the economy and in the meantime blithly go about their business murdering innocents around the globe for the enrichment of the corporations. Nary a word is ever said about military spending being the cause of the deficit because that would be political suicide for anyone brave enough to do anything about it.

What a sick, inhumane country this has become and anyone who thinks it will get better if O is reelected need only look at his shameful record.
 
 
+4 # futhark 2012-01-27 15:41
The evils of an active policy of military interventionism far outweigh any good that Barack Obama may be doing or planning on the economic or environmental fronts. I cannot support a candidate who is in the pocket of the military industrial complex and who blithely celebrates assassination as a political or "diplomatic" tool.
 
 
+1 # RMDC 2012-01-28 06:29
Thanks Laura. You are right. "Speaking of the troops, President Obama began: "At a time when too many of our institutions have let us down, they exceed all expectations."

Does Obama include the marines who were caught filming themselves pissing on Afghans they had murdered. I guess if it is murder and terrorism, the troops do exceed all expectations -- and all bounds of law and humanity.

I did not watch the speech. I did not want to throw up for the night. I heard that he never mentioned OWS. It appears that Obama is still pandering to the right wing and the fascists in the neo-cons and imperialists. What an asshole. And yet he is still better than Newt. Just try to imagine Newt giving this speech.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.