Pierce writes: "You were the smiling face of unimaginable bigotry, the sunny spokesman for greed and selfishness, the friendly game-show host handing out cruelty as a lovely parting gift, the chuckling ringmaster summoning up the worse angels of our nature. You richly deserve in posterity every crazy thing that people now say they are doing in your name, in service to your legacy, and as a perfect statement of everything for which you once stood."
President Reagan at a rally for Texas Republican candidates in Irving, Texas, 10/11/82. (photo: Reagan Library)
Dear Ronald Reagan: Thanks for Wrecking America
08 February 12
urns out yesterday would have been Ronald Reagan's 101st birthday. In all the excitement over the tsunami of Santorum that engulfed the country, it plumb got right by me. So, let me say, in my own belated way, and because behind-the-times was the basis for Reagan's entire career, happy birthday, ya silly old coot.
How do you like your party now, Ronnie? A Mormon everyone hates, a world-historical balloon animal 10 years past his sell-by date, a survivalist crank from Texas, and a guy who is pretty much a dick. That's the party you and your boys created. That's the end product of the "conservative movement" of which you were the amiable and occasionally coherent figurehead, a prop in your own life. You know how you know that's the case, Ronnie? Look how hard they're trying to memorialize you in concrete and marble. They stuck your name on National Airport, and on the biggest and ugliest building in Washington, D.C., to celebrate your devotion to smaller government. What was it that Bogart said in that detective movie?
The cheaper the crook, the gaudier the patter.
You taught us that "deficits don't matter." (Dick Cheney himself reminded us of that.) You sold missiles to the terrorist-sponsoring mullahs in Iran so you could sponsor our own priest-slaughtering terrorists in Central America, thereby laying the groundwork for all the secret deceptions in foreign policy that led to the Iraq war, which was designed and launched by some of your own old Iran-Contra hands, and thereby also laying the groundwork for the destructive increase in presidential power that continues (alas) to this day, under a Democratic president.
You did more than anyone else to demolish the notion of a political commonwealth, the principle that "government" is a common enterprise that must be undertaken by all citizens, and not some foreign entity to be whipped and controlled. You brought "states' rights" back from the historical ignominy where it richly deserved to have been sunk. You showed how The Other can get you elected, how elections are really simply magic shows of pretty images and soft music. You ruled for an entire second term as a symptomatic Alzheimer's patient and dared anyone to act in a patriotic manner and suggest you step down. Nobody did. You robbed the system of its confidence. You broke down important constitutional barriers that have yet to be reconstructed. You were the first among vandals.
You unleashed the stubborn archetypes that still stalk the process. The young bucks buying steaks. The welfare queen in her Cadillac. Today it's "illegals" flooding our streets, and poor people with their gout and their flatscreen TV's. And yet, at the end, when you did some genuine work with Gorbachev on defusing the Cold War, or when you raised taxes in 1983 to get us out of the recession caused by your first Crayola-sketched budget, they turned on you in a big way. Howard Phillips called you a "useful idiot," and even George Will was forced to put down his sherry, shake his head sadly, and pronounce that he found in your foreign policy "little delight." (Oh, George. You're so ... rugged.) In 1987, when the Soviet Union was falling to pieces, Will wrote:
"Reagan seems to accept the core of the catechism of the anti-nuclear left - the notion that the threat is the existence of nuclear weapons, not the nature of the Soviet regime."
That's gratitude for you right there, Ronnie. And thus was established yet another principle held dear by the political movement you championed - anything a beloved leader does of which the hardbars do not approve is simply Not Conservative. Thus did you help dig the memory hole in which is now deeply entombed the entire presidency of George W. Bush. Thus did you create the mechanism by which your younger acolytes can now turn you into a tin god to be worshiped by a party in which your actual policies might well now be considered too liberal for discussion.
You were the smiling face of unimaginable bigotry, the sunny spokesman for greed and selfishness, the friendly game-show host handing out cruelty as a lovely parting gift, the chuckling ringmaster summoning up the worse angels of our nature. You richly deserve in posterity every crazy thing that people now say they are doing in your name, in service to your legacy, and as a perfect statement of everything for which you once stood. Enjoy it, wherever you are and, like I said, happy birthday.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |











Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Reagan was a bad governor, and a terrible president, even if Bush may have been the "power behind the throne"
As we know he was also an informant in the Mc Carthy era. And he messed up California on his own.
It's real irony that the things he did do good are the things that are all too liberal to be considered republican.
I believe everyone has said the truth here. I have a book called "THe house of Bush House of Saud" I just got it but expect it to reveal a whole lot.
www.whatnowtoons.com
it's up now. Left of center Independent political cartoons
Nothing has ever trickled down economically.
Ronald Reagan was enabler of the Haters that became the Conservative movement, he was ignorant of the issues that faced America, such as Race, Energy, Economics. His actual policies have been distorted over time to ignore the non conservative compromises he made, to the point where most Right Wing Idiots don't know that Reagan actually raised taxes sometimes. This type of ignorance is his true Legacy: "Ignore the facts, disregard history, lets implement voodoo economics, calculated using fuzzy math and decide policy while wearing ideological straight jackets."
But that's OK because Ronald Reagan made us forget about the 60's and 70's.
Thanks Ronnie! We are grateful all your followers have brought down upon us. NOT!
NEVER VOTE REPUBLICAN!!
They all want to imitate Ronald Reagan.
You are SOOO wrong about Reagan not hating. He hated the poor, ("I was poor once and now ---!" or words to that effect), he hated the left and was a tattle-tale and fink for McCarthy, he hated the environment -otherwise why would he have turned the appalling James Watt loose on the land? And he was no lover of peace.
And don't forget that his V.P.-to-be daddy Bush did a deal with the hostage-takers and Mullahs to keep the Iran hostages back until R' was elected.
He was NOT a people person either -just a consummate actor and not a good one either. He just played the amiable buffoon to lull the more-easily-swayed into the "Aw-shucks" comfort zone. Ergo, his main contribution to US politics was plunging it into the age of infotainment from which it has never recovered and is in fact getting worse. I remember his barf-making ads using "Nancy, I couldn't do it without Nancy" (-and her psychic decision-makers, what?)
And he has the distinction of massively increasing the government he claimed to be "The problem" by 189%,
Nice eh?
How many of you were "Reagan Democrats" b.t.w.?
I have no idea how many were Reagan Democrats. I do know that I was not one of them. I have never ever been a fan of, or a voter for Ronald Reagan.
If you read my second paragraph you will see what I called his legacy, not much different from what you said. And I stand by what I said, he was an enabler of those that were haters. He is still responsible for his actions that allowed the decline of the Middle Class to take root, strong environmental laws to stagnate, anti-trust legislation to wither away, Racism to fester, and energy policy to become more hazardous to our health and safety. Oh and you are right, he loved war, but not to a larger degree than other Presidents.
Please do not assume that when someone says something slightly positive about somebody that they are in love with them.
No assumption made -just not taken in by his play-acting (including the "Nancy" ad) but don't take my word for it; look at his pre-pres' record from credible sources. And when I wondered how many were Reagan Democrats I was not suggesting for a minute that you were one so don't take it so personally. Just asking a fair question.
I may have been over sensitive about the Reagan Democrat, but it came across to me as an accusation. No matter.
I think we may have to agree to disagree about whether or not RR was a hater. In the end we agree about two major points. First, RR, intentionally or not, set the US on a path into ignorance. And second, The Right Wing blogs really suck because they don't allow any dissension to be heard. (more ignorance)
It doesn't matter to me what he might have believed personally, he embraced the politics of division and hate that has created the toxic and stagnant climate we live in today.
He made it much worse for it gave the illnes time to spread, before warnings and information could help some to take precautions.
"They stuck your name on National Airport, and on the biggest and ugliest building in Washington, D.C., to celebrate your devotion to smaller government."
By the way, Reagan was already exhibiting signs of dementia when he was governor of California. But no one paid attention--except his handlers who saw an oppy to turn a Hollywood prop into a presidential prop whom they could manipulate to the max. Boy did they ever.
writer as well. So much of what is true
has been dumbed down and down and down.
What was good (and sometimes necessary) in 1980 does not apply anymore, although some people are clinging to the illusion of "one size fits all" politics and try to freeze us in a time that doesn't exist anymore.
But the way GOPers try to deify Reagan is ludicrous and counterproducti ve.
The guy that drove us into deep deficits after 200 years or virtually no debt)
Or was Reagan the real Chauncey Gardner? Hmmmm
Reagan Blurts- 'GOVERNMENT IS THE PROBLEM.'
The 30 year long Corporate CONservative FLIM FLAM begins to disassemble the greatest, most envied Government System in World History at the behest of Global Corporate Interests under the umbrella Talking Point of 'Getting Government Off Our Backs.'
It's all sold as the pathway to greater Freedom, Liberty and Prosperity for ALL!
Relentless Deregulation and De-Taxation Schemes on behalf of Global Corporate Interests occur year after year.
Global Corporate Wealth, Power, Size and Influence snowballs as their Want and Greed is unshackled.
Government is bought and paid for.
The expanding power and wealth of the 1% Global Corporate Class accelerates.
Almost all Media Enterprises are bought and exploited by a very few Global Conglomerates beholden only to their Global Shareholders.
The snowballing of Corporate power and influence becomes exponential.
The Talking Point is now- 'SMALLER GOVERNMENT' (aka, Less Government) in the name of LIBERTY FOR ALL!
Corporate Contracting of Government Functions into a million bits and useless pieces for the sake of Corporate Coffers spreads to all levels of Government.
We the People become known as We the Consumers.
Corporate Dominion over everything expands to 'Brave New Orwellian World' size.
WELCOME TO THE OUTCOME OF THE REAGAN CONSERVATIVE REVOLUTION, Government run by Global Corporate Lobby.
"There" is the public world that once made sense, with hundreds of competitive media outlets that actually investigated wrong-doing and helped promote "common" justice and fairness, Murrow and Cronkite and Woodward & Bernstein, actual privacy, the seminal Watergate Hearings, proving "No one, not even the president, is above the law" (at least until Bush/Cheney), at least 20% down required to buy any home, your credit and ability to pay investigated up the wazoo before you got a mortgage held by the lender, guys like Boesky, Keating, Milken and Ebbers sent to prison for stuff that today gets you a multi-million dollar retention bonus (Bill Moyers interviews former Citicorp CEO John Reed online...jaw-dropping).
"Here" is THIS: the giant, steaming pile of fraudulent, unaccountable, corrupt, bought, lying, greedy, did I mention corrupt, shit we call the ravaged American economy and political clown circus, where the Super PAC is the new "citizen", and the citizen schmo is a squashed sugar ant under Sheldon Adelson's spa slipper. Mike Deaver and Don Regan had Ronnie sewed up tight; they were the Buffalo Bob twins to Reagan's Howdy Doody. The presidential lips moved, but whose voice came out? Show Biz.
"Gather 'round, children. Once upon a time...."
The more who can tell the story the better, they will find it harder to get rid of many than few.
One does wonder about people who admire the likes of Reagan and Thatcher.
Because the 1% have so much of the f-ing money and the bottom 50% have way too little is the reason for the disparity.
How about implementing policies to spread the wealth (Oh my! Is LL a COMMIE?) then your problem goes away.
Get it?
Most moguls did something shady and got away with it. Wasn't that Robt's exception to his wealth goes to the worthy speech?
Most of the uber-wealthy either won the gene pool lottery or stole something. Except maybe for entertainers, especially Giselle; looking at her is very entertaining! (Something for my super sensitive female friends to get upset about)
I am stopping now, because your simplistic thinking that somehow the market distributes wealth with any kind of fairness. You are naive. The Giants won the game, they get the trophy. Period. The market worked in that case and in the field of sports usually does.
But does Giselle or Tom deserve the extraordinary pay they make? Is that fair to the teacher, the nurse, the garbage collector, the help desk person that really does help you, the waiter that makes sure you are treated as well as the multi millionaire at the tablenext you.
STOP BLAMING VICTIMS!
It is ruder than shouting. And it is also disgustingly wrong.
O Great Platitudinous One - basically you are suggesting that the American jobless move to China or Korea perhaps? Kind of 'follow your leaders'? And maybe Americans would be smarter if teachers were paid a better salary, rather than (deliberately?) keeping US education at such a low standard that in 2009 by International standards the US came 37th in Maths? Communist China came first. Perhaps it was this lack of Maths talent that caused the global economic crisis? Not just greed, but sheer stupidity? I'm only asking.
You are full of self-generated swamp-gas and assumption as usual Mr Robot-Eagle. I'm one of the "New Poor" yet I support RSN with as much or little as I can manage and it's pretty little most of the time, spread the word as suggested. Like other non-commercial media such as our local radio KBOO, the real news is worth a little every month for the privilege of calling or writing in and sharing sometimes unique points of view. It is pretty typical for any truly free media (And I exclude the milquetoast PBS in this) that relies on it's supporters to keep going, that only about 10% of the readers/listeners in their demographic actually donate and/or volunteer. And they always allow free, unfiltered access to gasbags like you but it doesn't work the other way round -you still haven't pointed me at a right-wing anything where I can butt in like you do; go on, make a liar out of me!
Yep; and many of them came home to the School of the Americas -or came out of there in the first place.
Of course, you folk HATE facts. You would rather wallow around in your own stupid fantacies and self- imposed deceptions..
Facts, as spelled out in this article, can fix a lot of problems , but it can't fix stupid, in the PRESENT nor in the FUTURE.
Hack out some more FACTS. We can use all we can get.
- Bankrupted the now former soviet union ( a trick big government welfare state liberals and big government warfare neocons are doing here) Got us out of the double digit Cartertarian inflation malaze (we are now repeating that by volume of cash to low friends in high places - AUDIT THE FED) and restored the notion that we can be the shining city on the hill.
Lets not forget that :
-Carter inheirted inflation from nixon / Ford. Remenber WIP –whip inflation Now bottons
_Carter Appointed Volker
-the Repubs totally sandbagged Carter at every turn and sabatodged every bill t omake carter look bad
-the oil embargos were the result of the blowback of failed mdeast policy..look at the price of oil and inflation and they are the same chart
-much of that inflation was the result of the debt encountered during the vietman war
-much of Carter policies were startng to work as reagan stole the election with the, behind the scenes , arms for hostage deal with the enemy
–all reagan did was increase military spending on the arms race/cold war to make to economy after inflaton was undre control
although regan has been cannonized by the tea party, his administration was extreeemly corrupt where Carter played by the rules
Carter before him started with inflation at 5.2%
http://www.usinflationcalculator.com/inflation/historical-inflation-rates/
Carter appointed Volker as the Fedhead and he kept raising interests rates until inflation subsided. The high interest rate policys were just starting to work when RayGun stole the office.
The main problem was the high oil prices and the OPEC fake oil shortages .
- Bankrupted the now former soviet union quote]
I was in the Soviet Union 3 months after their invasion of Afghanistan and it was obvious, even then, that their economy would collapse. The CIA knew it and let the White House know but Reagan and Bush didn't find that information to be to their liking because they wouldn't be able to justify their massive increase in military/industrial spending if that were the case.
They decided to punish the Russia hands at the CIA and set up something they called TEAM B which would come up with the fear mongering data that they needed to be able to rob the American people and transfer wealth to their friends in the defense industries. Just like Baby Bush did when Rumsfeld/Cheney did the same thing to the CIA again prior to the Iraq war with his Defense Intelligence Agency which cooked up lies with Ahmed Chalabi an his goons.
As I said during the Iraq war- "I never thought I'd feel nostalgic for the good old days of Nixon and the CIA."
Militaristic empire USA is probably in the worst situation today - "10 years after their invasion of Afghanistan"
GM (Government Motors)AIG, Fanny Mae, Freddi Mack .. Goldman Sacs ... The FED. Those who look only at republican cronyism and ignore democratic cronyism are just as stupid as those who only look at democrat cronyism and ignore republican's. We are getting screwed by both party elites.
Quoting
Aye -tripping over his own shoe laces most of the time, protected by his handlers.
That is the voodoo economics tenat of repug/tea party that "deficits don't matter." Unless there is a Democratic president
You mean to say that you don't think Reagan should replace Jefferson on Mount Rushmore?
How unkind of you, and on his birthday too!
So it was Reagan that was personally spreading it ... Gees And I thought it was largely a symptom of a behavioral choice.
And it came to pass that they all got it in the end.
In his regime,many died in Central and South America in order that the Doles etc. could benefit from cheap labor and exploit
the general populations.I have no fond memories of Ronald Reagan,although things have gotten so much out of hand today with covert actions all over the world,in the efforts of regime change,that it does make him look good by today's standards.
But haven't you all noticed that modern Republicans ALWAYS propose the stupidest person they can find to be president. Reagan was just the first in a string of malleable, ethics-free figureheads that TPTB use to be the front-man for their diabolical policies.
They always make sure that there are plenty of wars so they can launder public money and turn it into private profit and kill off a sufficient number of the 99% at the same time. Two birds with one stone.
And the American people fall for it over and over as long as it's disguised in enough fear.
http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorialopinion/article/1038961--apocalyptic-crisis-budgeting .
If not available here's an excerpt:
QUOTE:
During the Reagan era, a friend and former colleague, a professor of American history, was invited to the deliberations of a Washington think-tank that provided policy direction for the Republican Party. As they discussed growing the debt and increasing the deficit, he was flabbergasted: “Are you not the party of balanced budgets and debt elimination?” The reply was unequivocal, “Our goal is to grow the deficit as much as possible in order to create political space to eliminate government-funded programming. Until then, we want high deficits while lobbying for a balanced budget — and promoting social program cuts as the only solution.”
To create this useful deficit, tax cuts to wealthy individuals and corporate sectors would be dramatically increased, especially to the banking, energy and military segments. In short, one would implement a transfer of the state’s revenue supply obligations from the wealthiest to the poor and middle classes in order to permit an even greater transfer of wealth from the middle classes to the rich thereafter.
The only trick was to convince the poor and middle classes to “buy in” via a mixture of patriotism and structural necessity so that they would vote in favour of cutting the very programs that benefited them.
It wasn't long after Bonzo's reign began that we began to see more and more homeless people in our state, home to no military contractors. Federal money was taken out of almost everything but military spending.
Ronald Reagan was one thing and one thing only, and he had only one purpose: a shill for the military industrial complex charged with funneling the nation's wealth into the coffers of the military contractors. The rest was tasteless window dressing.
"and (Reagan) restored the notion that we can be the shining city on the hill."
R U still here, trolling around with your right-wing talking points blather. Yeah, we're really a "shining city"--in DEATH VALLEY, way below sea level, Ronnie's old backdrop when he was pitching 20-Mule Team Borax. Thanks to your hero and his spawn, 41 and 43, the "shining city", a rotten piece of Hollywood dialogue if I ever heard one, might as well be Fukishima after the earthquake.
Are you one of the dimwits that showed up in that recent scientific study about conservatives being morons, or is it morons being conservative?
Sadly he compromised with the democrats on government spending and it grew even faster -- tis nice to be liberal with other peoples money.
Tear Down that WALL!
I bet my $50,000,000,000 ,000 Zimbabwe note that we can't do it much longer.
Between the two "Great" World Wars the 1% financial community offered us the gambling con that most Americans know as "public ownership of the means of production", the Stock Market (place your bets! the House will always win! and your "vote" as a shareholder" will NEVER counts - gotcha!!).
Big Government, with a human face, was the emergency solution to the Great Depression nightmare that investing on 'credit' allowed.
The 1%, by any mean-from buying the government and media to propagandizing emotional divisions between citizens-monopolizes everything. What you still own, they can take from you if you stray from a very narrow path. If they don't have enough of YOUR money, THEIR FED will print more for them.
Whether you are right or not, Reagan had about as much of a sense or knowledge of history as Pinnochio.
First: Carter had strengthen the 10% IRS investment tax credit for capital purchasers (equipment, facilities). It produced significant economic growth as small business and farmers could shelter TAXES rather than income while improving productivity. Just like big business, the little guy could come away with new and better stuff and not have to pay near as much tax.
Second: As a housing stimulus 'double declining depreciation' was allowed as a policy to increase new and renovated housing stock for lower income wage earners. Increased housing investments by middle income wage earners, enhanced renovation in blighted neighborhoods, provided more livable housing AND lowered taxes by increasing middle class tax deductions by more than expenditures.
BOTH were killed by the "reform", transferring the tax burden BACK to the middle class.
NO HERO, just some movie poster president .. two dimensions, lacking both heart and brain, waiting for makeup and a script.
Oh, yes, Ganymede...may it be so!
What's great is that, by defending him, they're being pounced on by people with better memories. It's good for all of us to have them challenge us by repeating the phony history the MSM wants us to buy. It gives us an opening to point out how full of b.s. they are.
Thanks for furthering the point of the article "marty the freedom lover", and "the robbed eagle".
Actually, I quite enjoy "Martinfire's" fairly combative and occasionally pungently instructive posts. At least he is a freedom seeker like me albeit by a different route. I've decided to ignore the Rob-ot as a hopeless case and perhaps a plant by FOX (I've yet to receive a reply to my two-way press-access street or pretty much else). Perhaps he doth presume from his lofty but o'-so-predictable blinkered peak, to instruct us on the progressive end how HIS world works for he alone, without any justification nor rationale. ("Greed is good" is a very revealing phrase). Pretty miserably-constricted cipher methinks who should go to his room and remove the truss.
Now for all I read, hear, I ask where were you all at voting time? Where were you all when he was closing down jobs and Unions? I know I was marching against him.
I know who voted for him...the parents of asses who voted in GW. We had a chance to clean house with first a term ReaGun but no let's not. then got Pappa CIA WMD DRUG/ARMS Dealer in. Years later GW???? Now look at the pickins..do you realize what we look like and do not care. The hierarchy everywhere is laughing at us. They allow cute wars of independence so you all believe in OB again.(no bodies to prove anyone is dead) Amazing rescues by our Military when they please to do so. Think of how many people could have been saved
I am reckoning that many are twenty or less because otherwise with all your Political Prowess I would like to know how the USA got this way. I know thousands of people in NE that were fighting to keep them out, doing more than that for Environment, Social and Animal rights, we still are.
All I see here are words, lots of them. No Action, like I said Believe 1% of all who sign in ever even sent a dollar to OWS no less walked with them.
ReaGun was brain dead, I would love those medical records but AMA burned them. Time to cut the strings. Not gonna happen while sitting on a computer. Join or die, that will be World's choice.
My dopey sister-in-law voted for him because she felt that he was a fatherly figure.. He was also one of the first of the Jerry Falwell social conservative politicans to talk the anti-choice agenda
And again, will you please cease the rants about "all words and no actions." You have no idea what any other poster on this forum does, in terms of actions. If you are busy marching, protesting, walking with OWS, and so on, and still have time to read and write posts, perhaps others do, too. OWS, while one of the best things that's happened in this country in years, is nevertheless not the only vehicle for change.
The author somehow thinks distinguishing between citizens and non-citizens is illegitimate. That is just what the Reaganites want people to believe - that an endless number of illegal aliens should be allowed to pour into this country, and drive down wages and the rest for US citizens while remitting money to prop up the corrupt oligarchies to the south. When is the left going to remove its head from its rectum about this issue? You cannot have a viable welfare state and a unionized workforce at home with porous borders, across which millions of illegal aliens are pouring. It is just plain economics, and plain common sense.
On the other hand, when NAFTA was passed, people like Clinton and Gore promised US citizens that the treaty would REDUCE illegal immigration by raising living standards in Mexico. We can see in retrospect what a callous lie that was.
Bottom line: Every country in the world, Mexico included, enforces its borders. It does so because its citizens want and expect it, and it is part and parcel of international law. And US citizens have every right to expect that the our borders will be enforced too. People on the left like to call this racism, but it is just one more sign of how the left is completely out of touch with popular sentiment in this country, and resorts in knee-jerk fashion to bad faith charges like racism (like the author of the above article), whose only purpose is to end debate and discussion.
Also, you're a bit behind the times-there was NO NET IMMIGRATION this year.
I've been saying for years that "we'll know the Republicans have gotten their way when the border patrol is on the Mexican side shooting at us as we try to go south."
We're almost there!
Older Americans are leaving - can NOT afford US doctors.
Another thing - We get about 3 million people coming here on tourist visas each year. And 30% of them do not go home. That has not changed one bit in recent years. And that means almost 1 million more people are coming in illegally through visa overstays, each and every year.
As for calling Mexico and Guatemala and the rest corrupt oligarchies, it is just a fact. 95% of the wealth of those countries is owned by less than 1% of the population. And they are solving their domestic poverty problem by dumping it on us.
The left is a wonder to me. You people talk about how the US cannot be the world's policeman, but you seem to think that it can be the world's welfare agency. Well, have a look at a public opinion poll. 65% of Americans say "Enforce current law" and "No more amnesties". And it is not racist to say it. The majority does not want to import more poverty, period.
HE got it right that government is the problem not the solution - but then he turned around a fueled the same problem to massively new heights of deficit and ultimately debt - only in Reagan's first year was the deficit less then all 4 years of Carter combined.
The debt tripped over the trillion mark during his administration and has never looked back.
The problem with compromise's like Reagan and essentially the rest is
both sides have bad ideas that won't and should not pass on their own - dems pushing the welfare state - repubs pushing the war fare state. We can't afford either one - yet they compromise and we get both. What is the debt now? 15+ trillion.
We can't fund all of our promises now.
How sound Are the untouchable programs like Social security Medicare Medicaid that Reagan 'fixed'-- they are not.
The political process has been turned into a Friday Night "Winner Take All" football title game with cheerleaders, steroid enhanced athletes and bribed umpires and field judges. Our interests and needs have been hyped by those who promote the game, lease us the field, sell us the tickets and concessions and, then, ask us for donations for the "team". Our "welfare" rests on whether we consider only ourselves or whether we consider US to mean ALL of us, you, me and ALL of 'them'. That debate is where each of us need to address our own personal wishes, feelings and true beliefs.
What Reagan ment to me was college assistance being slashed and minimun wage not keeping up with inflation thus disabling a vital means of social mobility . Also the very conservatives who mock an adult for living with their folks applauded the cutting of section eight housing .
It is true conservatism can not blamed for everything such as what sabotaged education was not just conservative idealogy such as slashing funds and creationism but social promotion and the evils of PMA(posistive mental atttitude). Unlike conservatives however most liberals learn from their mistakes and acknowledge them . Funding for tutoring and summer school should be restored along incresed standards for educational . Tax cuts deregulation gutting the safety net has only put this nation deeper into third world status and has not even produced anyone of a higher intellectual ability as promised by the social darwinist
What Reagan ment to me was college assistance being slashed and minimun wage not keeping up with inflation thus disabling a vital means of social mobility . Also the very conservatives who mock an adult for living with their folks applauded the cutting of section eight housing .
It is true conservatism can not blamed for everything such as what sabotaged education was not just conservative idealogy such as slashing funds and creationism but social promotion and the evils of PMA(posistive mental atttitude). Unlike conservatives however most liberals learn from their mistakes and acknowledge them . Funding for tutoring and summer school should be restored along incresed standards for educational . Tax cuts deregulation gutting the safety net has only put this nation deeper into third world status and has not even produced anyone of a higher intellectual ability as promised by the social darwinist . Idealism and elitism are bad enough alone but when combined equal calamity with compound interest .Reagan's idealism of the elites has brought nothing but calamity with compond interest by the second since his disasterous adminstration
thank you Ronnie Stupid
RSS feed for comments to this post.