Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Robert Reich excerpt: "The economy needs two whopping corporate tax cuts right now as much as someone with a serious heart condition needs Botox."

Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)


Why Obama's Corporate Tax Cuts Are Wrong

By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog

07 September 10

 

Why Obama is proposing whopping corporate tax cuts, and why he's wrong.

resident Obama reportedly will propose two big corporate tax cuts this week.

One would expand and make permanent the research and experimentation tax credit, at a cost of about $100 billion over the next ten years. The other would allow companies to write off 100 percent of their new investments in plant and equipment between now and the end of 2011 at a cost next year of substantially more than $100 billion (but a ten-year cost of about $30 billion since those write-offs wouldn't be taken over the longer-term).

The economy needs two whopping corporate tax cuts right now as much as someone with a serious heart condition needs Botox.

The reason businesses aren't investing in new plant and equipment has nothing to do with the cost of capital. It's because they don't need the additional capacity. There isn't enough demand for their goods and services to justify it. Consumers aren't buying because they're trying to come out from under a huge debt load, including mortgage debt; they have to start saving because their nest eggs are worth substantially less; and they've lost or are worried about losing jobs and pay.

In any event, small businesses don't have enough profits against which to use these tax credits and deductions, and large corporations are sitting on over a trillion dollars of profits and don't need them.

Republicans and corporate lobbyists have been demanding tax cuts on corporate investments for one reason: Big corporations are investing in automated equipment, robotics, numerically-controlled machine tools, and software. These investments are designed to boost profits by permanently replacing workers and cutting payrolls. The tax breaks Obama is proposing would make such investments all the more profitable.

In sum, Obama's proposed corporate tax cuts (1) won't generate more jobs because they don't put any cash in worker's pockets (as would, for example, exempting the first $20,000 of income from the payroll tax and making up the difference by applying the payroll tax to incomes over $250,000); (2) will subsidize companies to cut even more jobs; and (3) will cost $130 billion - money that could better be spent helping states and locales avoid laying off thousands of teachers, fire fighters, and police.

So why is Obama proposing them? To put Republicans in a bind. If they refuse to go along he can justifiably say they have no agenda other than obstruction. After all, the only thing they've been arguing for is lower taxes. On the other hand, if Republicans agree to support these corporate tax cuts, Obama can claim a legislative victory that will help Democrats neutralize their opponents in the upcoming elections.

The proposals also make it harder for Republicans to argue the Bush income tax cuts should be extended for the richest 3 percent of taxpayers because small businesses need it. Obama's corporate tax cuts would appear to do the trick.

The White House probably figures even if Republicans agree to the proposed tax cuts, nothing will come of it. Congress will be in session for only about two weeks between now and the midterm elections so it's doubtful these proposals would be enacted in any event.

But this cynical exercise could backfire if Republicans call Obama's bluff and demand the corporate tax cuts be put on a fast track and get signed into legislation before the midterms.

More troubling, Obama's whopping proposed corporate tax cuts help legitimize the supply-side dogma that the economy's biggest obstacle to growth is the cost of capital, rather than the plight of ordinary working people.

 

Robert Reich is Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written twelve books, including "The Work of Nations," "Locked in the Cabinet" and "Supercapitalism." His upcoming book, "AFTERSHOCK: The Next Economy and America's Future," is due out in mid-September. His "Marketplace" commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.

 

Comments  

 
-4 # Guest 2010-09-07 21:27
Your full of crap! Not taxing the middle class and taxing the rich will put more money into the system and you know it! The only way to get this country back on its feet is to start spending. And the only way for spending to start is through the middle classes! Hey professor get a grip on reality!
 
 
-1 # Guest 2010-09-08 03:18
I'm starting to think the corruption of Chicago has moved in to the White House! This is unbelievable! All to hurt Republicans...I don't think so! What does Obama think it will do to his left...I don't like him now but he will become my sworn enemy if he does this!
 
 
+12 # Guest 2010-09-08 04:03
At some point I'd like to see Robert Reich tell it like it really is. Our economy crashed because the elites bought off our politicians and they passed NAFTA, CAFTA, GATT, and repealed the Glass-Steagall banking regulations and passed the Bush tax cuts and subsidies for companies who outsourced jobs to India and China... all because they were paid to do these stupid things with campaign contributions. Our corrupt political system is going to destroy our democracy, and the only way to fix it is to pass public funding of campaigns. If politicians are going to be beholden to their funders, those funders must be the taxpayers who pay their salaries.

Jack Lohman ...
http://MoneyedPoliticians.net
 
 
+6 # Guest 2010-09-08 05:29
I think Prof. Reich is correct on this one. We can never recover if we don't have jobs for the people that pay a living wage. We've allowed corporations to ship those all overseas. There is no demand because people can't afford to buy, and they'll never start spending until they have decent jobs.
 
 
+4 # Guest 2010-09-08 10:45
The investment in labor REPLACING technology is what the corporations must do in order to maximize profits, which they must do in order to survive. That is the underlying dilemma facing this government and all governments now. The needs of the working masses (includes unemployed, part-timers, contingency workers, undocumented, etc., those who have only their labor power to bargain with) are being sacrificed to save a class of people that are literally parasites on society, the global rich. "We the people" need to turn the pyramid upside down and make the common "wealth" work for us.
 
 
+3 # Guest 2010-09-08 11:16
Regarding the personal (not corporate tax),I think Obama (and Congress) would get a lot less flack about letting the tax cuts expire if the top bracket started at $500k or $1M, rather than the current $200-$250k. $250k simply is no longer "rich" in America.

Does anybody have any data as to what it would cost the treasury to change the top bracket to $500k or $1M ?

My guess is that America would support an even higher tax rate (45%) for income's over $1M or $5M. That would be very tough for anyone to argue with
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-09-08 21:31
Re: Robert.... the MSNBC talking heads say of those whose taxable income is greater than $250,000 , 80% of that groups taxable income is greater than $1,000,000. Policically, it would be an easier sell if the Dems only went after the 80%.... Watch and see the republicans squirm defending that group...
 
 
0 # Guest 2010-09-11 19:23
Companies would be able to write off 100 percent of their new investments in plant and equipment between now and the end of 2011? So once again the tax payers are subsidizing the for-profit sector. The savings would go directly into profits and shareholders, not into hiring people (and probably training them adequately on the new equipment/technology). How much of that equipment is manufactured in the U.S.? How many of those companies are foreign owned and controlled?
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.