Robert Reich begins: "It's a perfect storm. And I'm not talking about the impending dangers facing Democrats. I'm talking about the dangers facing our democracy."
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)
The Perfect Storm
18 October 10
t's a perfect storm. And I'm not talking about the impending dangers facing Democrats. I'm talking about the dangers facing our democracy.
First, income in America is now more concentrated in fewer hands than it's been in 80 years. Almost a quarter of total income generated in the United States is going to the top 1 percent of Americans.
The top one-tenth of one percent of Americans now earn as much as the bottom 120 million of us.
Who are these people? With the exception of a few entrepreneurs like Bill Gates, they're top executives of big corporations and Wall Street, hedge-fund managers, and private equity managers. They include the Koch brothers, whose wealth increased by billions last year, and who are now funding tea party candidates across the nation.
Which gets us to the second part of the perfect storm. A relatively few Americans are buying our democracy as never before. And they're doing it completely in secret.
Hundreds of millions of dollars are pouring into advertisements for and against candidates - without a trace of where the dollars are coming from. They're laundered through a handful of groups. Fred Maleck, whom you may remember as deputy director of Richard Nixon's notorious Committee to Reelect the President (dubbed Creep in the Watergate scandal), is running one of them. Republican operative Karl Rove runs another. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, a third.
The Supreme Court's Citizens United vs. the Federal Election Commission made it possible. The Federal Election Commission says only 32 percent of groups paying for election ads are disclosing the names of their donors. By comparison, in the 2006 midterm, 97 percent disclosed; in 2008, almost half disclosed.
We're back to the late 19th century when the lackeys of robber barons literally deposited sacks of cash on the desks of friendly legislators. The public never knew who was bribing whom.
Just before it recessed the House passed a bill that would require that the names of all such donors be publicly disclosed. But it couldn't get through the Senate. Every Republican voted against it. (To see how far the GOP has come, nearly ten years ago campaign disclosure was supported by 48 of 54 Republican senators.)
Here's the third part of the perfect storm. Most Americans are in trouble. Their jobs, incomes, savings, and even homes are on the line. They need a government that's working for them, not for the privileged and the powerful.
Yet their state and local taxes are rising. And their services are being cut. Teachers and firefighters are being laid off. The roads and bridges they count on are crumbling, pipelines are leaking, schools are dilapidated, and public libraries are being shut.
There's no jobs bill to speak of. No WPA to hire those who can't find jobs in the private sector. Unemployment insurance doesn't reach half of the unemployed.
Washington says nothing can be done. There's no money left.
No money? The marginal income tax rate on the very rich is the lowest it's been in more than 80 years. Under President Dwight Eisenhower (who no one would have accused of being a radical) it was 91 percent. Now it's 36 percent. Congress is even fighting over whether to end the temporary Bush tax cut for the rich and return them to the Clinton top tax of 39 percent.
Much of the income of the highest earners is treated as capital gains, anyway - subject to a 15 percent tax. The typical hedge-fund and private-equity manager paid only 17 percent last year. Their earnings were not exactly modest. The top 15 hedge-fund managers earned an average of $1 billion.
Congress won't even return to the estate tax in place during the Clinton administration – which applied only to those in the top 2 percent of incomes.
It won't limit the tax deductions of the very rich, which include interest payments on multi-million dollar mortgages. (Yet Wall Street refuses to allow homeowners who can't meet mortgage payments to include their primary residence in personal bankruptcy.)
There's plenty of money to help stranded Americans, just not the political will to raise it. And at the rate secret money is flooding our political system, even less political will in the future.
The perfect storm: An unprecedented concentration of income and wealth at the top; a record amount of secret money flooding our democracy; and a public becoming increasingly angry and cynical about a government that's raising its taxes, reducing its services, and unable to get it back to work.
We're losing our democracy to a different system. It's called plutocracy.
Robert Reich is Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written twelve books, including "The Work of Nations," "Locked in the Cabinet," "Supercapitalism" and his latest book, "AFTERSHOCK: The Next Economy and America's Future." His 'Marketplace' commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |











Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Plutocracy perhaps. But we are surely losing our Republic to a new phenomenon for sure-- a COROPORATACRACY OF THE CORPORATE BY THE CORPORATE AND FOR THE CORPORATE supported by the narrowly owned Global Corporate Media which now own almost all Media Enterprises in America-- Soon to probably become completely consolidated under one Global Corporate Roof and become the New Propaganda Ministry-or- The Center for Spoken 'Truth' and Social Calm or something like that.
There are three branches of Corpor-governation...
1. The Executive Back Patter in Chief who has been deregulated into the back seat.
2. The US(urped) Congress of Corporate Facilitations.
3. The Supreme Court of Corporate Considerations.
Elections are still held so as to keep the Consumers happy that they can pull the lever against somebody in order to vent their corporate media driven anger every two years.
Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.
-- Benito Mussolini
_______________ ______________
"I hope we shall crush ... in its birth the aristocracy of our moneyed corporations, which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength and bid defiance to the laws of our country."
--Thomas Jefferson
"I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. . . . corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed."
-- U.S. President Abraham Lincoln, Nov. 21, 1864
Now Ron D, in all fairness Robert Reich has opined on these many times before. In the context of his article it really is sufficient to say that the rich are not paying their fare share, arguably 91%. Perhaps if they were the waste you mentioned might actually be quite affordable after all...and that IS the point. We are paying more for less because the wealthy are paying way too little and of course it is an irony that those who benefit the most pay proportional the very least.
In Dwight Eisenhower's farewell speech in chapter 5 (V) he said:
Another factor in maintaining balance involves the element of time. As we peer into society's future, we -- you and I, and our government -- must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering, for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow". Insolvency... indeed!
Big Wave Dave, Ventura, Calif.
I'd say ignorance by far, and willful ignorance at that.
"Which is worse now in this country, ignorance or apathy?"and unfortunately the average citizen answers "I don't know, and I don't care!"
You could not be more wrong. It matters a great deal who is elected this November. You are woefully misinformed and another one of those who think cynicism is smart and chic. Because of people with your attitude loony tea baggers have gained credibility.
Read Naomi Klein's the Shock Doctrine.
I have to wonder if their program doesn't have a weak link, however. They are using people like Beck, Bachmann and Palin to push their agenda, but these people are also pushing so-called second amendment solutions which may erupt in the sort of solution that the wealthy want no part of.
My own feeling is that instead of an armed insurrection, their program will result in a massive violent criminal eruption similar to what Mexico is now facing. The rich in Mexico are getting out as fast as they can, but what happens to the uberwealthy in the US when their lives in the US are threatened? Where do they go to be safe then?
PRECISELY!
You say, "The first time around the Robber Barons were just seeing how the game is played, and they lost."
Think that one through again. Morgan, Carnegie, Rockefeller and the boys certainly did not loose. Their money continues to fund Progressive reform in America and more importantly in the other continents of our planet. Through education and research and foundation and many an intrusive institution, their schemes drive modernity. I doubt you studied under a single Aggie Prof whose foundational ideas were not grounded in the notions of those men. Shucks, Henry Ford benefited from association with their works and it was his expertise in mass production that laid an industrial foundation under the Soviet Union back in the 20s and 30s.
May the Council on Foreign Relations and the UN Charter continue to bless you.
Good point Klare, except for one thing--we don't need to storm Washington, that's a distraction. We need to storm New York City. Wall Street. Big Banks headquarters. Corporate headquarters. Where the real action is.
But still use your remaining power. Vote. You'd be surprised how our collective votes makes a difference. Just make sure it is counted, use paper.
Ventura, Calif.
While I watched the rescue of the miners in Chile, I was thinking: This country used to do things like that, but we can't anymore. We lurch from one disaster to another due to ineptitude and corruption.
I suggest we not think "never" Paul. There must be a better way that can yet be invented.
Dear Robert Reich,
Your assessment is correct, and it has been that way for decades. It is the nature of power to continually fall to fewer hands. But, what is to be done about it; have elections? The political apparatus is completely dysfunctional in that regard. The situation can not be altered within its own context.
So, again, what the heck do you think can be done about it?
Please, let me know.
Sincerely yours, Reed Kinney
Yes, we must tax the rich. Yes, we need a new WPA. Real healthcare, public option.
But lets stop the wars and the worship of the military, and spend that money at home.
Sad! This was such great place at one time. Now we have pulp TV and the dumbing down of the populace is complete.
We sat back and watched the whole thing.
That fire power hasn't even put down Afghanistan--never really subdued Iraq.
Don't Americans have as much spirit is those two peoples?
Like most mainstream commentary Riech is way behind the curve. We lost the republic in 1947 with the imposition of the national security state. The people have been used--and now used up--they are through with us...trash time.\\ll//
Never give up your power. All of history and all of science indicates the that balance is what prevails. Your vote is part of the collective power of the masses that provides that balance. Just make sure it is counted, use paper.
I wish you were right. I'm going to vote but please don't tell me it has anything to do with changing anything AT ALL. People who think that they are doing their patriotic duty by voting...and are actually participating in representationa l democracy, need to have their heads examined. It just isn't so. Joseph, your say on who even gets to run in the first place (unless you're extremely wealthy) is zip, zero, nada...just plain nothing. If you believe in participatory democracy and are confused enough into believing that voting at this time matters, you have my pity.
"I think I saw a real estate agent."
-- Alice Sheldon, "The Screwfly Solution"
"[T]he ideal would be to train cattle to make butcher knives and take turns cutting each other up at a convenient location. [...] Which leaves only one more basic attribute of my people: we are very, very hungry."
-- Broodseven-sub-two Raksha of the Krundai, in "Unnatural Causes" by Spider Robinson
"I think we're fished for."
-- Charles Hoy Fort
I lived in Argentina in 1978 & there wasn't a damn thing anyone could do about being "disappeared". If they want you, (even if your NOT in a cell) you will be theirs! All the military might & power we have created to fight these terrorists can easily be turned in our direction!
I even suspect that it has already begun. You're right. If it hasn't it will. This is standard operating procedure for our intelligence forces outside of our boarders and has been for decades. With the Patriot Act for one thing, it seems simply inevitable.
For the love of God...I am so sick of hearing this utterly inane point repeated ad nauseum...as if it were clever and meaningful. Well, Ron Paul 2012, we may live in a REPUBLIC simply because you say so, but a DEMOCRACY? What a load of vomit! And your comment somehow suggests that since we live in a REPUBLIC, it's not a democracy and democracy doesn't matter. Perhaps YOU are the problem. Perhaps YOU are a fascist. My guess is that you are.
And come on now...come up with some other talking point that doesn't sound so stupid.
What is the difference between a democracy and a republic? In a democracy, the majority rules on any issue. In a republic, the basic precepts are strictly beyond limits to any vote. Changes can only be made by amendment.
As the founding fathers knew, Democracy is the worst form of government. In fact, it is so bad that there has never been a true democracy.
Democracy has a simple definition:
Mob Rule... It's what brought Hitler to power... and we are supposed to live in a Democratic Republic, but we have devolved into a Democracy.
With Republi-crats firmly entrenched as a professional political class, in absolute servitude to their constituents... Wall Street Banks and Corporations, we are losing the whole country.
Democrats don't get it...neither do Republicans. Once Republicans get past November 2nd, they are in for a rude awakening... people are P*SSED OFF, and tired of the BS of the Professional Politicians!
When are Americans going to wake up, and just flush ALL the political grifters down the toilet?
By 2012... we could end up having a revolution...
Republicans don't understand the sentiment of Americans any better than the Democrats.
Look, fascism has a simple definition too. Totalitarian rule of the monied elite, very small in size, over the rest of us. It's what brings modern politicians into power. And you think you understand the sentiment of Americans? Gee, I think they'd like a real democracy just fine!
Sigh...you very likely are correct. I wouldn't argue against this. I guess the choices are complete acquiescence, revolution and anarchy. I think the choice will be forced on each individual though. Even passiveness while your way of life, economic stability and your basic human rights crumble away from you, involves a very individual and personal choice. As for me, going quietly into that good night is nonsense. I believe in revolution, even if I am the only one engaging in it. I happen to be optimistic though. Call me crazy, but I believe coalitions of energy, talent, goals, are still possible.
(Smile) I'm so glad you ask! I apologize for having to be cryptic but I believe, in a counterintuitiv e way perhaps, that the best is yet to be. And there's two of us, then four, then eight, then sixteen, then thirty two....etc. It ain't over until we've all given up.
The best is yet to be. Trust and believe, and when the time comes, ACT!!!
Amanda, you are right, of course, and nay sayers are, shall I be charitable and say, ignorant.
I believe it was Winston Churchill who added the clause "...except for all the others that have ever been tried."
Nice to know that cash will rule over the majority... NOT!
All it takes is one look or a quick read of the Federalist Papers number 10
to realize how adamant the FF were against a democracy
The Bill of Rights was written to expressly limit the power of the Federal Government
(see the SCOTUS ruling Barron versus Baltimore)
It was not written to legislate rights
I blame education
NO ONE is taught this information due to the usurping of our God Given rights thanks to the 14th Amendment
People want to label this kind of talk as super right wing
But is the way our US Constitution is written
BTW
technically we are a democratic-republic
That is why Thomas Jefferson ran as a democratic republican
Your faux history lesson seems to suggest Franklin was refering to a republican government. It absolutely was not. It refered to an elected...DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED...government. I rather think B. Franklin was fond of democracy and was cautioning that we might not be good enough, strong enough or capable enough to keep it. Maybe he was right. We'll see. Meanwhile, kindly contribute to piping down on the the bs that "we're a republic and not a democracy". Did I say bs? Oops! I meant bull shit.
The Public is afraid, ignorant, and confused. The Public is easily misled and believes anyone that promises hope.
There is no hope to correct this meltdown. The meltdown, like a nuclear meltdown, burned through the containment building and headed to the center of the Earth. No one can stop it because, there was no plan in case such an event ever happened! Same as the destruction of America. ALL the checks and balances in government were turned to the "OFF" position.
Now, we are just waiting to see how much damage will occur as the core of the Society burns through every country in the World. No one, no human that is can alter the extinction-level event we are part of!
Well written article but, it just identifies the problems and traitors but, it doesn't rally people and doesn't call to arms a movement that can rid us of ALL career politicians. Politicians that historically, make lying a career goal!
It is the ability of the indiders to print off unlimited dark pools of cash that allow these mega banks consolidate everything and leave nothing for the rest of us.
Oh...whoops...Soros and MoveOn support the Dems' side of the aisle. I guess it's no wonder you didn't mention them, then.
We also have to do something about the inequality of representation in the Senate and Electoral College. I would like to see blue voters colonize a few sparsely populated red leaning states. That is the fastest way to disempower the Party of No.
Interesting to note that one of the key individuals heading the fight to keep the estate tax in place is the father of Bill Gates. Why is that? The answer lies in your statement, "Congress won't even return to the estate tax . . . which applied only to those in the top 2 percent of incomes."
The problem is in the word "incomes." For the super rich, i.e., the Bill Gates and Warren Buffets of the world, keeping their wealth is never about their incomes or capital gains.
That is why foundations were invented when the income tax was imposed upon the American people: to help the super rich from paying taxes
This is fact - and I will vote for taxing incomes over $200K - it is the infrastructure that helps them be rich.
A lynch mob is a democracy....the group as long as the majority uses their might to bring it about can put all sorts of poorly conceived ideas into being whereas a republic delegates a smaller group of representatives to convene and study the value of a law before they hang it on the tree....
Every once in a while a lynch mob is exactly what is necessary and that time seems to be rapidly approaching, but until then we need to understand the difference of collectivism and individualism and no one has ever explained it better than G Edward Griffin.
Read this and learn....
http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/deception.html
?????????
...Completely asinine comment
How can we protect the individual from the group? That is precisely what a Republic accomplishes. A Republic is simply a limited Democracy - a Democracy with limits on what the group can do, with limits on what the majority can do.
G Edward Griffin is one of the greatest educators in America....read his essay so you understand the comment instead of being a typical reactionary....you have been brainwashed for knee jerk reactions and intellectual laziness...the point is you can easily be out voted whatever your opinion is and a republic helps to protect your opinion...get it? If not follow the link and read the essay....
I am astonished that you are getting negatives on your comment. You are completely correct. To say that democracy is a lynch mob is as stupid as saying that our country, since it's a republic, isn't a democracy...as if by definition "repulic" and "democracy" were seperable. I guess some people like being stupid.
Because we are an alleged democracy, we'd darn well better be a republic! That's what we'd have to be by definition!
But when people do not know the differences between collectivism and individualism then they will never understand how corruption achieves its ends. The Creedence Clearwater song, "I'm no senators son, I'm not the fortunate one." Is a perfect example of collectivism in action...The elite senators and bankers and University funders don't send their sons to die in a war....because their collective looks out for themselves while all other collectives and individuals are divided and conquered.
I love your mention of Creedence Clearwater. Their lyrics to that song should be carved in granite and displayed in the National Gallery.
So what, Rand Paul 2012? Do you also worship the "Aqua Buddha" like your namesake?
Ventura, Calif.
BOTH parties are fully owned and controlled. People still shouting the 'other' party is to blame are playing the game exactly as intended.
There is one party in this country and regardless of its rhetoric, it represents the top 2%. The rest is window dressing.
Wake up!
I think they're called "Republicrats" and their mascot is an elephant's ass. Works for me any way.
Yes ... it is the Extreme Court (probably also taking some of those bags of cash).
Yes ... it is the selling off of America, lock, stock and barrel.
BUT ... the real problem is the ELEPHANT in the room. To paraphrase Mr. Reich's former boss:
"IT IS THE PENTAGON BUDGET, STUPID!"
Do any of you actually believe there is any difference between the last 6 administrations ? Or more?
We lost this battle when we lost Kennedy, and Johnson set the dogs out.
The real quaetsion, is 'what do we do about it?'.
You are absolutely correct. Everything
that is happening now can be directly linked back to the assassination of JFK.
When the American public refused to stand
up and demand the truth of JFK's murder
at the hands of the Military Industrial
Complex, the fix was in and it has been
down hill ever since. There is only ONE
solution: It is time for a REAL third
party that can take back the Govt. from
the jackals that control it now. And it has to happen in 2012...!!
Revolution.
The opportunity to choose is utterly meaningless and irrelevant when the supposed choices that are offered are fundamentally the same ones with different packaging.
If people would accept that our government is corrupt and run by criminals, perhaps we could finally move forward. The Americans people have been lied to more than the Russians in the Soviet Union. Our news is similar to TASS.
Revolution.
http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/deception.html
But the real substance of the group is the individual within it. It’s like a forest. Forest doesn’t exist. It’s a word concept. There are only trees." So the individualist sees that, if you sacrifice the individual for the group, you have made a huge mistake. The individual is the essence of the group. He is the core of the group. The group has no claim to sacrifice its own essence.
Collectivists are often critics of religious and family values, because collectivism demands unquestioning obedience to the state. Since loyalty to family or religious codes often conflict with the concept of group supremacy, they cannot be tolerated in a collectivist system.
More reason to maintain your individual power, your ability to reason in the face of rage, your ability to seek balance as Nature does. Vote, the single, most powerful tool in this Constitutional Republic of ours, remains sacred, so that even those scoundrels, who would desecrate it by fixing the machine vote count, fear its power. Vote and use paper ballots for accountablity.
I used to parrot all the same liberal soundbites until I read his work and he explained a hundred years worth of clever psychological deceptions that cleverly had me and billions of others screaming for even more government to run our lives...which is exactly what the elite wants.
Read the essay to understand Cecil Rhodes the blood for diamonds guy funded the teachings that the elite were smarter and should lead the lesser beings....the rest of us....Our forefathers may have been flawed but they escaped tyranny and attempted to set up a check and balance system to keep what they escaped from happening here...I understand some of them committed the same crimes against blacks and Indians but no one gets smarter by being afraid to look at all the evidence...however ugly....
http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/deception.html
http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/deception.html
folks read the essay it will clear up so many questions and arguments....please....
And to Robert Reich, I know your essay has its heart in the right place but that first sentence of America being a democracy is at the heart of the confusion we all argue about on a daily basis...
The evident hazards of being half educated are...
Wether you accept it or not, I apologize. Perhaps I was misdirecting my frustrations. Given G. Edward Griffins education, and that I am just as educated as he I should probably limit myself to opining that he is a pompous windbag whom I'd love to take the stage and debate with. You can call me names, like windbag, or worse if it pleases you. It really doesn't matter to me.
(Sigh)...this activity falls under entertainment so it doesn't carry any high priority with me. None the less, if you can figure out a way for RSN to communicate contact information to me so I can reach you or whomever for this purpose I will gladly check my calendar and consider. I will endeavor to read Griffins to depth to make sure that I am clear on the distinctions between hisarguments and your conclusions/arguments. Who knows? Maybe I really should be debating you? Will I get to promote the book I am working on that challenges some of the views? Can we time this closer to my publishing date next year? A little quid pro quo wouldn't hurt a thing!
Wow, you managed to lose my interest in your third sentence. You know very well, Robert, that our nation is a constitutional republic. It has NEVER been a democracy. Why would you spout such an inaccurate statement?
What an absurd excuse for not bothering to listen. "republic" is synonymous with "democracy". Check your dictionary and think for yourself for a change.
What about the undocumented TARP spending? or a word about Federal Government spending period?
Maybe these are just another storm front you missed AGAIN on the radar.
"A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.”
deciding whats for dinner..."
Benjamin Franklin (?)
Clever. I wonder what we should call fascism? Totalitarianism ? Plutocracy? I mean, democracy can mean lots of bad things I'm sure. So what better form would you propose? Any ideas?
Nope. Read your democracy. The Constitution also doesn't utter the word corporation either.
Uh...the word "republic" is synonimous with "democracy"....at least it is in my Oxford American College Dictionary. I think your point is deliberately misleading...distracting and wrong.
The Clinton admin, of which RR was a member of gave us the Subprime loan by opening up borrowing to the so called poor and less fortunate. The Bush admin gave us TARP, and Obama has spent 3 Trillion dollars in two years and has absolutly nothing to show for it, but unemployment going up to 10% this month.
Economists have put the actual "real unemployment" numbers in the neighborhood of 16-27%. The government cooks the books on the unemployment numbers and other economic numbers and has for many years and many Presidents of both parties.
As long as the propaganda machine keeps the middle class turning its anger in on its own people, there will be no change in direction. Unions should be buying up radio stations and local newspaper while they still have some clout. Local communities should be doing the same. Losing the small town independent newspapers has been an immeasurable loss to a sense of community.
But someone wanted to take the monks' Guinness beer out of the fridge without permission; and everybody knows, bad things happen when you mess with the monks- be it medieval (early 14thc France), early modern (latter 18thc France), or "even" the thoroughly money-dependent world of today.
Slavers usually don't like it when the labor seems like they're having a better time on this Earth than the masters. And Joe Friar in the 2nd Estate monastery-univ-media has to listen to them complain all day, too- not just the wage serfs & contract laborers of the 3rd estate.
Wake up people, wake up. This is lightweight distraction from an academic and an insider. That is a double whammy.
We'll all do much better to go inwards now, inwards, deeply, even if painfully.
The outside is just more of the same sex, lies and DVDs.
Anadianant
http:///aadivaahan.wordpress.com
If what Reich says is a puff piece because he said it, on what foundation do you claim any conceivable credibility yourself? I don't mean to be rude. I'm just curious.
Gee, thumbs down and I'm still not getting an answer. I wonder why.
plutocracy is not catchy enuf.
The Republicans know this so they put Relitgious Right religion on their sleves.
In either case, these blocke of voters will turn out in droves and swing a mediocre 30% voter turnout into a Republican victory. Just look at the Bush elections. The man was a monkey's arce, yet he won 2 terms.
So, don't let this happen again. Vote. The collective intelligence can only win when your vote and the vote is properly counted. Vote on paper ballots.
What's going on in America is not random-by chance. It's completely calculated and going according to plan.
And not to mention what bankrupts US - military spending - where the profits are - is not solving anything - start with the root cause - get of this defense spending bandwagon - cut it to zero.
Revolution.
I say that the revolution has already been born in the hearts of enough people, and growing, such that even so large an obstacle is surmountable. For one, we have the internet. If not that, is it so inconcievable that a vigorous and dynamic underground press could come into being? Patience bjw...it isn't over until everyone has given up, and that ain't gonna' happen. You'll see. Time will tell.
So, while you are all debating the various intellectualiti tes of the case, what is your action plan for your future? Being swept along with the masses into social impotence and financial graves? Non-apathetic and educated does not change things does it? So my question is seriously asked : what country are you going to emigrate to in order to have a better life for your family?
Fascinating. I'm the last of my generation that hasn't migrated away from this country to a better country (there really are a good number of them). Me? I'd rather stay and fight. Oh, and my children have left as well but promise to come back when the revolution begins.
Revolution
"A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.” Thomas Jefferson
Use it to drive the ticks out of NY...
There is also legislation in Congress called S.752 The Fair Elections Now Act which would be a start to enable ordinary people to run for office and more importantly to have their voices heard. Call, write, visit your elected representatives and ask, urge, demand that the pass this legislation ASAP.
The work is not done with the passage of legislation then people have to actually USE THE OPPORTUNITY to run for office.
It's called citizenship. Unfortunately most of us either never learned or have forgotten how to do this. It's never too late to learn.
We are living through a shift in technological platforms as earth-shaking as that wrought by the steam engine and industrial organization. This time we have no undoubted moral foundation to sustain us. The scientific heresies of establishment match establishment spirituality and establishment government. It is time to stop calling everyone you disagree with a fool or a traitor, or a loonie, or whatever evil name most easily rolls from you tongue.
It is time to find common ground with one another, to rediscover your moral foundation, to seek the formula that led to American exceptionalism in the past and that led Western Civilization to share its gifts with the world. Snicker? Did you snicker? Name the nations that brought you antibiotics, fllight, the end of slavery, the end of barbarism, and all manner of evil that not so long ago dominated the planet.
If there are folks who claim allegiance to an ideal and fail to live up to the ideal, does that mean the ideal is false? Like it or not, Western Civilization built on a Christian foundation has led the world to where it is. In 1808 America and Britain stopped the Atlantic Slave trade. Among the nations that ended slavery, a universal institution until the 19th century, America under Lincoln was the only one to end it by war. Among the nations that championed representative government, America stands at the head. Among the nations that fostered technological development, Britain and America stand at the head. The very notions you have of fairness derive from your impoverished understanding of that history. Enrich yourself. If you want to know where you are, look at where your country has been.
Freedom from enslavement to emotional turmoil is a great freedom.
Christ offers that freedom.
Like you, I rather admire a kind of hypocracy. It is indeed good to believe in things greater than what we might achieve. But your Eurocentric/anglocentric take on history defeats you. Ending slavery was almost incidental to Lincoln. The Civil War was NOT about slavery. Heck, read Sanburg's Lincoln Library for that. As for Western Civilization (a highly questioned bit of rhetoric) being built on a Christian foundation, I profoundly beg to differ. So much to argue, so little space! Look, western civilization could destroy the world, a world still almost brand new to the very notion of civilization.
Californians HAD an initiative to elect their Secretary of State with taxpayer funding. She's the one who keeps our elections clean. The initiative was voted down -- the opposition said it would "cost too much."
Believe it or not, hypnosis is real. Repetitive messages (of gloom and doom or whatever) infect one's subconscious with the dominant program/paradigm. remember even Buddha is quoted as saying, "What we think about, we become."
Please focus upon solutions rather than problems.
When we think our own thoughts and create our own visions, we create our own economy....more people got rich during the Great Depression of the late 20's and 30's because they thought thoughts which countered the dominant [paradigm.
WHen we think independent thoughts, we create independent realities...
We can overcome the dominant paradigm by thinking and connecting independently.
Fighting the power donates energy to the power the best retaliation is to ignore the power and create one's own game...
Peace be to all beings!
JohnSea
Up with G*d;
down with Satan!
His ridiculous claim it's the Republicans you idiots is disgusting.
Divide the people. Mr. Reich and his friends only fear that we understand what they are attempting to do.
It is one thing to be uniformed, however too tell others the truth is a lie is criminal.
oh pppuuullleeeeee zzzzz...and I'm supposed to cut off name calling. Okay. I won't do any name calling. I think this comments speaks for itself. Never mind me. I'm just groaning a bit.
YOU, who would create peace in your heart and urge others to do the same in order to change the status quo which you rightly refer to as the tragic human condition, ARE A REVOLUTIONARY. Don't discredit yourself. If our ambition is to a world responsive to the common good, the common ground that we need to find, to make change will require revolution, an ultimately all encompassing revolution. If your goal is to participate in making the world a better place, a peaceful place, this is going to simply have to go beyond creating this in our hearts. It will take action and not just a state of inner being. That's what a revolution is.
I suggest Reich (re) examines the realities of socialism, start with the USSR...
As for the realities of socialism, as our country goes down the toilet, the strongest economies on earth, at least ten stroner than ours, are socialist. Never mind the USSR. We spent them into economic self destruction in the Cold War...much like our military budget is destroying us now.
Ironically, socialist countries have corporations and they don't rape their employees nearly as bad as ours does. Odd you should think we should be grateful for a lifestyle the corporations gave us. It's WE who gave THEM their wealth through our undercompensate d labor, for one thing.
Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.
-- Benito Mussolini
_______________ ______________
"I hope we shall crush ... in its birth the aristocracy of our moneyed corporations, which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength and bid defiance to the laws of our country."
--Thomas Jefferson
"I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. . . . corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed."
-- U.S. President Abraham Lincoln, Nov. 21, 1864
Plutocracy and permanent war.
I think our generation will start to see terrible changes to the world that Americans in our generation and our own generation have taken for granted. Many of us have become too complacent and distracted to even notice. Others feel so overwhelmed that we don't know what to do. And the rest are portrayed as outsiders, or as nut cases who are unpatriotic and seek to destroy our nation. When in actuality nothing is more patriotic than expressing your point of view with the intentions to improve life for your fellow citizens.
The second part is people. People do things based on integrity and money. If we could fix the integrity problem, we would not need money.
Imagine; Go to the store, get the food, go to the checkout and scan them in. Then, instead of paying, stop. Go home. Your lights are on, the furniture is there, but no money. Go to work, do your job & at the end of the week, no paycheck.
See a cashless society. The hard part is fixing people. We have millions of great minds in the world. Let’s find real solutions to greed & arrogance. No more governments purchased by the wealthy and the religious fanatics. It’s time to evolve to the next intellectual level. Treat the person next to you with respect and integrity. History repeats itself; change or die. It’s happened to every civilization so far.
RSS feed for comments to this post.